Tu-22М3 caused a group airstrike on the objects of terrorists in the province of Deir ez-Zor

145
Long-range bombers Tu-22М3 of the Russian Aerospace Forces inflicted a group airstrike on terrorist objects of the Islamic State * (IG *, organization banned in the Russian Federation) in Syria, near the town of Abu Kemal, Deir-ez-Zor province. This was reported on Saturday in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

Tu-22М3 caused a group airstrike on the objects of terrorists in the province of Deir ez-Zor




On November 4, 2017, long-range Tu-22M3 bombers, taking off from the territory of Russia and flying over the territory of Iraq and Iran, inflicted a group aviation strike on terrorist targets in the area of ​​Abu Kemal city of Deir ez-Zor province
- Said in the department.

As specified in the Ministry of Defense, the targets for destruction were warehouses of weapons and ammunition of terrorists, as well as command posts of IG gangs *.

The targets for destruction were warehouses of weapons and ammunition of terrorists, as well as command posts of IG gangs *. Objective control data confirms the defeat of all designated objects.
- noted in the department.

Over the territory of Syria, long-range aircraft were accompanied by crews of Su-30CM fighters from Hmeimim airfield. After the combat mission was completed, all Russian aircraft returned to their home airfields.

"Islamic State *" (IG *) is a terrorist organization banned in Russia
145 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    4 November 2017 16: 15
    Isn’t it time to bomb and “calibrate” the Defenders?
    1. +28
      4 November 2017 16: 43
      Tu-22М3 caused a group airstrike on the objects of terrorists in the province of Deir ez-Zor

      The fifth day we fry kebab from barmaley. wink
      1. +16
        4 November 2017 16: 46
        Quote: 79807420129
        The fifth day we fry kebab from barmaley.

        wah! you have a net of conscience! saliva a lot laughing hi drinks
        1. +26
          4 November 2017 17: 25
          Comrades, this is our VKS so celebrate the holiday!
          With a twinkle, so to speak ...
          1. +11
            4 November 2017 17: 30
            Quote: Logall
            With a twinkle, so to speak ...

            where do they celebrate? I also want to go there, as in the photo laughing drinks
          2. +9
            4 November 2017 19: 26
            The most accurate photo for this holiday ... all all violet ....
            1. 0
              5 November 2017 14: 28
              It is you, sir, so decided. For all, please do not speak. There are other color schemes.
          3. +2
            5 November 2017 14: 42
            I, this! Where? I want! The car is warming up. Address? bully
            1. +1
              5 November 2017 14: 46
              If the red color worries you so much ............)) Warm up, already, the car, and get down to business. You already know the address.
              1. +2
                5 November 2017 14: 52
                The question is not for you.
                1. +1
                  5 November 2017 14: 54
                  Accepted. But then ask questions more precisely and "more specifically" ...)
                  1. +2
                    5 November 2017 15: 13
                    And you yourself could not understand? Although, no offense to you. The comment was for a photo.Logall . Well, it's okay. Sorry if I offended. Everything is normal, I hope? While the weekend, you can and for friendship. If something in PM! Good luck, colleague! A little help. hi Let's blow a little? drinks
    2. +4
      4 November 2017 16: 43
      World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
      With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.
      1. +28
        4 November 2017 17: 00
        Quote: Chestnut
        World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
        With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

        What a fresh thought! These are actually missile carriers. At the moment, they just bomb the savages with freely falling bombs. Anestend?
      2. +18
        4 November 2017 17: 21
        Quote: Chestnut
        ... It will pass with the Papuans, but they will not reach a serious enemy ...

        You about your concept to the Papuans, who are currently multiplied by zero in the Syrian desert, explain laughing
        At the same time, tell the preoccupied exceptional warriors that the bombs are not for them, but for the Papuans. And then once again the Pentagon-NATO talking head will come out and will sculpt that the bombs hit the right terrorists laughing
      3. +12
        4 November 2017 17: 22
        Quote: Chestnut
        With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

        For a serious enemy, they have other weapons: X-15 and X-22 (this is from the old, we can and newer is). And with Tu-22 bombs they were still flying to Afghanistan. Muffled by the fathers of the current barmaley.
      4. +2
        4 November 2017 17: 29
        Quote: Chestnut
        World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
        With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

        Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century? request
        1. +10
          4 November 2017 18: 10
          Quote: professor
          to convince the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the XXI century?

          Actually, carpet bombing is a little different.
          “Carpet bombing” is a continuous, intensive, consistent bombing over large areas, usually settlements. At the same time, a large number of bombs are used (often in combination with incendiary bombs) to completely destroy the selected area, or to destroy the enemy’s personnel and equipment, or to demoralize them.
          However, Daesh and this is enough.
        2. +4
          4 November 2017 18: 12
          Professor, they are still effective when there is a lot of cast iron - why not?
          1. +3
            4 November 2017 20: 06
            Quote: novel xnumx
            Professor, they are still effective when there is a lot of cast iron - why not?

            Well, in principle, "to whom Gd will send" is also a method. True, it has been deprecated for years on 50-60. However, get me right. I am not at all against the bombing of Syria. The more you bomb, the less we have to bomb.

            Quote: Stilett_71
            Professor, if purely theoretically you are pierced by a spear with a flint tip, will this be proof of its effectiveness?

            Purely theoretically, a Papuan with a silicon tip on a spear will not have a single chance when I am armed and equipped as befits the 21 century. Purely theoretically. bully

            Quote: Stilett_71
            There are no more or less effective or dangerous weapons, there are more effective and dangerous people

            I absolutely disagree with you. Here is an example of an "effective" weapon in 2008 (4 Tu-22) and an "not effective" weapon in 2006 (one Ф-16).

            1. 0
              4 November 2017 20: 53
              20.06/XNUMX. Professor! And what from the point of view of a specialist is more effective in this struggle? Gauges launched at distant lands? Aircraft with bombs and rockets? Artillery? Guided missiles from turntables or launchers? How to conduct such a war more militarily and economically? Why does Russia bullet with gauges and send planes? From a small mind or is it more economical and efficient? Why can't these depots and command posts be hit by ground delivery vehicles or turntables? Does Russia simply have no such weapons?
              1. +1
                4 November 2017 22: 09
                Quote: Region 34
                And what from the point of view of a specialist is more effective in this struggle?

                Elementary. The Russian Defense Ministry said that the Tu-22 was accompanied by fighters taking off from a base in Syria. Religion did not allow the fighters themselves to bombard with these three tons? Since we started talking about efficiency ...
                1. +2
                  4 November 2017 22: 13
                  Quote: professor
                  The Russian Defense Ministry said that the Tu-22 was accompanied by fighters taking off from a base in Syria. Religion did not allow the fighters themselves to bombard with these three tons? Since we started talking about efficiency ...

                  Likely that the Israeli air force would not be shot down by chance, like the Turks ..... what
                  1. 0
                    4 November 2017 22: 16
                    Quote: XXXIII
                    Quote: professor
                    The Russian Defense Ministry said that the Tu-22 was accompanied by fighters taking off from a base in Syria. Religion did not allow the fighters themselves to bombard with these three tons? Since we started talking about efficiency ...

                    Likely that the Israeli air force would not be shot down by chance, like the Turks ..... what

                    1. Bibi and Vova are friends.
                    2. Tu-22 flew from the east through the Islamic State of Iran, and not through Israel. From the Islamists and need an escort.
                    1. +2
                      4 November 2017 22: 19
                      Quote: professor
                      not through Israel
                      you also fly wherever you want, so it is better to have protection just in case from the rude ..... laughing
                      1. +1
                        4 November 2017 22: 26
                        Quote: XXXIII
                        you also fly wherever you want, so it is better to have protection just in case from the rude .....

                        1. Bibi and Vova are friends.
                        2. We do not fly there. All this is slander. wink
                    2. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                5 November 2017 14: 29
                Where are our Tulips and Peonies ?!
            2. +5
              5 November 2017 03: 28
              Quote: professor
              There are no more or less effective or dangerous weapons, there are more effective and dangerous people
              I absolutely disagree with you.

              And still I will insist. A weapon is a tool with a specific set of technical characteristics; its effectiveness or inefficiency depends on the method and results of the application chosen by the contractor.
              What is preferable to use in battle, an Abrams tank or a rusty rattle hung with iron? The answer seems obvious, however ...
              Everything is decided by the method of application, and in the end the human factor hi
              PS Yes, by the way, your disagreement with my thesis is confirmed by one of my old observations related to different approaches to the so-called "Western" and domestic schools for the development and production of weapons and military equipment. In the west, weapons are made to sell, and in Russia, to fight.
              1. 0
                5 November 2017 10: 04
                Quote: Stilett_71
                What is preferable to use in battle, an Abrams tank or a rusty rattle hung with iron? The answer seems obvious, however ...

                Do you claim that jihad mobilized on the videos you quoted are more effective than the Abrams tank? That is, if instead of these suicide bombers there was an ordinary tank Abrams with what crew should it be, then would the suicide bombers be more effective? I can not agree with you.

                Quote: Stilett_71
                PS Yes, by the way, your disagreement with my thesis is confirmed by one of my old observations related to different approaches to the so-called "Western" and domestic schools for the development and production of weapons and military equipment. In the west, weapons are made to sell, and in Russia, to fight.

                Well then, Russia should not at all strain about the deployment of weapons produced “to sell” at its borders, since Russia itself produced weapons “to fight”. wink
                1. 0
                  6 November 2017 03: 26
                  Quote: professor
                  That is, if instead of these suicide bombers there was an ordinary tank Abrams with what crew should it be, then would the suicide bombers be more effective?

                  Exactly! Think about it, in besieged Mosul (the video was shot there), with the coalition aviation completely dominating, such mobility and power-hungry equipment, and even without the possibility of normal maintenance ... Yes, Abrams would not have lived an hour, and the jihadmobile was quietly waiting in the wings and when the time came he did his crazy and dirty deed. But again, it all depends on the decision of the person, maybe there is such an unexpected way to use a tank, which I don’t know about fellow
                  Quote: professor
                  Well then, Russia should not strain at all

                  And we don’t strain, we just honestly warn everyone, otherwise history doesn’t teach anyone hi
        3. +5
          4 November 2017 18: 35
          Quote: professor
          Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century?

          Professor, if purely theoretically you are pierced by a spear with a flint tip, will this be proof of its effectiveness? what
          There are no more or less effective or dangerous weapons, there are more effective and dangerous people hi
          1. +5
            4 November 2017 20: 16
            Quote: Stilett_71
            ... Professor, if purely theoretically you are pierced by a spear with a flint tip, will this be proof of its effectiveness? what

            what ...It's not the same for everybody... recourse
        4. +12
          4 November 2017 19: 58
          Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century?

          You would ask bearded boys about efficiency laughing
          But I’m afraid you won’t ask and they won’t answer.
          On a canopy and a hat. Will need a device more efficient - there will be more efficient.
          It is the guys from behind the puddles who always want to convince someone of something. But Russia is not trying. She cherachit bearded man and rightly so.
          Or are you against it?
        5. +1
          4 November 2017 20: 29
          Quote: professor
          Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century?
          Yes, we do not have enough cruelty, we need to see who does it better .... wink
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. +2
          5 November 2017 00: 12
          Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the XNUMXst century? request
          Professor, do you really consider yourself an “expert” in all areas ?, or is it a beginning age problem?
        8. +5
          5 November 2017 00: 12
          Question to you dear professor. With Russian bombers and tactics, everything is clear. It is not clear with the high-tech aviation coalition led by the United States. They have how it happened with Mosul and Cancer. The same high-precision weapons were not enough. Something they did not bother to convince anyone at all. They cut the cities like a turtle god and do not give a damn about the accuracy and selectivity of airstrikes.
          1. 0
            5 November 2017 10: 06
            Quote: Theseus
            Question to you dear professor. With Russian bombers and tactics, everything is clear. It is not clear with the high-tech aviation coalition led by the United States. They have how it happened with Mosul and Cancer. The same high-precision weapons were not enough. Something they did not bother to convince anyone at all. They cut the cities like a turtle god and do not give a damn about the accuracy and selectivity of airstrikes.

            Of course, you have the data and you are not just throwing slogans about "They cut the cities like a turtle and don’t give a damn about the accuracy and selectivity of airstrikes."
      5. +1
        4 November 2017 18: 35
        in fact, all modern electronic warfare technologies, missiles, and anti-missiles were created in order to clear the field for bringing bombers to direct carpet bombing
      6. +3
        4 November 2017 19: 28
        Quote: Chestnut
        With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

        Each vegetable has its own bed ... For the "civilized" and there are rockets. And so, in this way, the “Second World War” and the Americans in those parts do not disdain ...
      7. +4
        4 November 2017 22: 46
        Quote: Chestnut
        With the Papuans will pass

        recourse recourse recourse actually on igilists and pour gifts in this way for this reason !!! wassat wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing tongue tongue
      8. +2
        5 November 2017 14: 13
        With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.
        You (Germans) are an absolutely serious enemy for us now. So ... indulge only.
    3. +18
      4 November 2017 16: 49
      Video to the news
      1. +8
        4 November 2017 18: 48
        Sergei hi . The third day I drink for the videoconferencing. After this news, my liver looked sadly at my beer supply (7 days, maximum 10), muttered: "I have to bomb."
        1. +4
          4 November 2017 19: 04
          But they work much more. We started five days from the salvo of the boat and have been bombing for four days now)
      2. 0
        4 November 2017 20: 44
        6 free bombs per plane? And all 6 on one object.
        1. +3
          4 November 2017 20: 52
          Six 500kg per plane, but can carry four times as much.
        2. +4
          4 November 2017 23: 00
          They fly from Mozdok without refueling, but I think 6 bombs are 500m-62 because they are attacking the same target with SVP-24-22. The second apparently lacks fuel and the length of the targets is not such as to drop 15-20 bombs in one series. In 2015, they worked as a rule with 12 ty of OFAB-250-270, but it became clear that the second six were not really needed and then they began to take 10 of the same bombs 6 + 4 or 6x500 m-62 or even Betab-500 alone once seen in the summer of 2016
          1. 0
            5 November 2017 18: 02
            Petio

            maybe all the same threw FAB-1500 on 6 pieces from the board?
    4. +3
      4 November 2017 20: 48
      Quote: 210ox
      Isn’t it time to bomb and “calibrate” the Defenders?

      Along the way, they bombed there. Their instructors, as in the Abu Kemal region, were hanging and screeching towards the Kurds. They probably ran, since the State Department is silent about the fact that again the Russian Aerospace Forces have fallen for the "peaceful people."
    5. +4
      4 November 2017 22: 28
      Quote: 210ox
      Isn’t it time to bomb and “calibrate” the Defenders?

      so maybe they are constantly being shredded !!! As practice has shown, the Americans do not tell us about their losses in Syria ... but finally it would be interesting to look at these statistics !!! wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
      1. +1
        5 November 2017 13: 01
        Why don't they tell? In Raqqah, they died alone
        Marine. They do not take part in hostilities in Syria, unlike Russia,
        therefore, there are almost no losses. But in Iraq they have two dozen killed. In a few episodes.
        1. +2
          5 November 2017 15: 40
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Why don't they tell? In Raqqah, they died alone
          Marine. They do not take part in hostilities in Syria, unlike Russia,
          therefore, there are almost no losses. But in Iraq they have two dozen killed. In a few episodes.

          we know how Americans love to hang noodles on their ears !!! wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing at such a pace they will soon have, like Svidmya - there are no losses, there are resurrected !!! lol lol lol but your right to believe in it .... although it’s a pity you if you really think that for all the time they committed war crimes in Syria, only one died in Raqqa !!! request request wassat wassat laughing laughing laughingand about Iraq, it’s finally from the realm of science fiction, so that for a decade of bringing chaos there while being there, they had two dozen killed ... especially given their "skill" in military affairs !!!! they have current as a result of 2 collisions of two ships, 2 dozen corpses ... and then the war on earth !!! wassat wassat wassat
          1. 0
            5 November 2017 18: 19
            "and about Iraq - it's finally from the realm of fiction, to a decade" ///.

            I had in mind - since the operation against ISIS in 2014.
            The actual defeat of the army of Saddam Hussein in 2003 (before the end of the assault on Baghdad) cost the Americans, of course, more expensive - already in 139 killed soldiers.
            Losses began later in the partisan war. In total, Americans lost 4,424 troops in Iraq from 2003 to 2017, including combat and non-combat losses.
            Always happy to help hi
  2. +14
    4 November 2017 16: 18
    The targets for the defeat were the weapons and ammunition depots of terrorists, as well as command posts of the IS gangs

    I hope the NATO advisers did not have time to dump
    1. +14
      4 November 2017 16: 32
      Quote: pvv113
      I hope the NATO advisers did not have time to dump

      namesake hello hi ah well done good this garden is well plowed - the weed, I hope, will not be able to climb drinks
      1. +9
        4 November 2017 16: 41
        Hello! So I hope that our agricultural technology will not fail! wink
        1. +11
          4 November 2017 16: 43
          Quote: pvv113
          that our agricultural technology will not let you down!

          michurinsk school good
          1. +7
            4 November 2017 16: 54
            That's it - the best in the world!
            1. +6
              4 November 2017 17: 26
              Quote: pvv113
              The targets for the defeat were the weapons and ammunition depots of terrorists, as well as command posts of the IS gangs

              I hope the NATO advisers did not have time to dump


              These are primarily dumped, we are warning the "partners". Hi Vladimir! hi
              1. +5
                4 November 2017 17: 33
                Hello Victor! Or maybe in vain we warn?
                1. +5
                  4 November 2017 17: 35
                  The paper is signed and we are honest.
                  1. +5
                    4 November 2017 17: 41
                    On this arrogant Saxons and count
                    1. +5
                      4 November 2017 17: 44
                      They are constantly surprised that we are even at our own expense, but we will abide by the agreement.
                      1. +4
                        4 November 2017 17: 53
                        I sometimes wonder too
                      2. +8
                        4 November 2017 18: 04
                        Quote: cniza
                        They are constantly surprised that we are even at our own expense, but we will abide by the agreement.

                        And achieve your goals. And they violate all that they can and one stump they do not work. crying
        2. +2
          4 November 2017 20: 34
          Quote: pvv113
          Hello! So I hope that our agricultural technology will not fail! wink


          good "flowers" are already tired - "Chrysanthemum", "Acacia", "Peony" ... Our country is becoming a leader in agriculture, because it is time for military "agronomists" to update the names - well, for example, what is Tu22, somehow impersonal but the Sower already sounds meaningfully! feel

          It would be necessary to announce a competition among barmaleys - for the best name of Russian bombs, and the winner of the competition - the main prize with an autograph, delivery at the expense of the VKS wassat
          1. +2
            4 November 2017 20: 55
            Dushmans Tu-22M3 shaitan-arba called wink
            1. +1
              4 November 2017 23: 14
              Dushmans Tu-22M3 shaitan-arba called

              It seems like Shilka was called a shaitan-arba.
              1. +2
                4 November 2017 23: 18
                I served on the Tu-22M3, I can’t say anything about Shilka
    2. +5
      4 November 2017 16: 40
      These nits zugunder far smell. They are except in a bag and drown ..
      Quote: pvv113
      The targets for the defeat were the weapons and ammunition depots of terrorists, as well as command posts of the IS gangs

      I hope the NATO advisers did not have time to dump
      1. +5
        4 November 2017 16: 43
        That's for sure - be healthy!
  3. +4
    4 November 2017 16: 19
    Stocked up something.
    1. +5
      4 November 2017 16: 26
      So they are driven there with a load of 30 percent of the maximum !!! belay This is more of a political game, and training of crews than a real combat mission.
      1. +2
        4 November 2017 16: 36
        They just do not have enough fuel, on the way back, at maximum load.
      2. +20
        4 November 2017 16: 37
        Six bombs of 500 kg each - three tons from each Tu-22M3 political game? Only 18 tons with six Tu-22M3.

        And they’re being chased for the fifth time, since the militants are used to it, then a “Caliber” strike is made, and then for weeks they do not strike. And here they are not given the head to raise the fifth day.
        1. +4
          4 November 2017 17: 39
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Six bombs of 500 kg each - three tons from each Tu-22M3 political game? Only 18 tons with six Tu-22M3.

          If Iran provided its airfields, they could take more. It is not clear only why refueling in the air is not used?
          1. +2
            4 November 2017 18: 28
            The Tu 22 does not have refueling rods in the air.
          2. +1
            4 November 2017 18: 29
            They fly six hours, I think closer to the Caspian refuel.
            1. +6
              4 November 2017 18: 53
              Sergei, someone here wrote that in the 90s, for the sake of mattresses, the refueling system from TU-22 was removed.
              1. +1
                4 November 2017 18: 59
                It's simple, you need to look at what distance they can fly without refueling, and how much they flew this time. Immediately find out with refueling in the air or with an intermittent landing and refueling at the airport.
                1. +4
                  4 November 2017 19: 03
                  I don’t know how this time, in the past, we flew through Iran and Iraq from Mozdok.
                  1. +3
                    4 November 2017 19: 05
                    And so now.
              2. +8
                4 November 2017 19: 12
                Quote: sabakina
                Sergei, someone here wrote that in the 90s, for the sake of mattresses, the refueling system from TU-22 was removed.

                Yes, the Tu-22M3 does not have a refueling system, although it was provided. "Thank you" to the "peace initiatives" of the Democrats of the 80-90s. Mate is not enough when I remember them.
          3. +4
            4 November 2017 20: 58
            The Tu-22M3 came under OSV-2, and with the light hand of Gorbachev in the mid-80s they gave the command to dismantle the air refueling system
  4. 0
    4 November 2017 16: 25
    yes skok there still these warehouses and points should like it’s all over
  5. +5
    4 November 2017 16: 26
    Finish off. Morally and physically. That's right. To write in pants, just thinking about Russia.
  6. +14
    4 November 2017 16: 31
    “The targets for the defeat were the weapons and ammunition depots of the terrorists, as well as the command posts of the IG gang *


    Ours are in a hurry, so soon the denouement will be.
  7. +6
    4 November 2017 16: 35
    every day they beat the bearded .. they’re just gathered together in a bunch, you won’t miss it ....
  8. +1
    4 November 2017 16: 37
    In the photo, it seems, concrete.
  9. +11
    4 November 2017 16: 38
    What's again? Something we seriously took up the pursuit of terrorists, apparently not in vain. Israel is preparing an aggression against Bashar al-Assad in the Golan Heights under the pretext of protecting the Druze, but in fact, in order to at least somehow help their proteges the Syrian killer bandits who are defeated in an attempt to pull back Syrian troops from Deir-ez-Zor province where, in addition to American advisers, Israeli instructors are also hiding to assist ISIS terrorists.
    “The end of the IG is near”
    1. +1
      4 November 2017 16: 43
      yes it's pathetic attempts, our everyone sees and knows
      1. +1
        4 November 2017 16: 47
        Quote: shans2
        yes it's pathetic attempts, our everyone sees and knows

        Yes, of course this is true, but Israel and the United States will now do everything possible to save the ISIS and Al-Nusra terrorists taking advantage of the fact that we and Iran are far away and the Syrian army is extremely weakened by a six-year war, so the direct aggression of the Israeli regime against Syria is now quite likely.
        Humanitarian aid in Hama.
    2. +5
      4 November 2017 16: 49
      Quote: quilted jacket
      What's again? Something we seriously took up the pursuit of terrorists, apparently not in vain. Israel is preparing an aggression against Bashar al-Assad in the Golan Heights under the pretext of protecting the Druze, but in fact, in order to at least somehow help their proteges the Syrian killer bandits who are defeated in an attempt to pull back Syrian troops from Deir-ez-Zor province where, in addition to American advisers, Israeli instructors are also hiding to assist ISIS terrorists.
      “The end of the IG is near”

      read wai - toru, they can't do that laughing drinks
      1. +5
        4 November 2017 17: 00
        Quote: pjastolov
        read wai - toru, they can't do that

        The Israeli regime "without blood" can not live?
        Convoy with humanitarian aid from the Russian Federation arrived in Aleppo
        1. +5
          4 November 2017 17: 11
          Quote: quilted jacket
          The Israeli regime "without blood" can not live?

          and how to water the altar? Yes? laughing
          1. +2
            4 November 2017 17: 15
            Quote: pjastolov
            and how to water the altar? Yes? laughing

            They say they not only water the "monumental architecture" of their religious cult smile
            1. +6
              4 November 2017 17: 20
              Quote: quilted jacket
              They speak her not only

              so etozh - gods request
              1. +3
                4 November 2017 17: 32
                Quote: pjastolov
                so etozh - gods

                Can they? smile
                1. +6
                  4 November 2017 17: 35
                  don't know - I'm not even a god laughing
    3. +1
      4 November 2017 17: 26
      Quote: quilted jacket
      de apparently besides the American advisers are hiding and Israeli instructors dedicated to assist ISIS terrorists.

      Today you won’t be surprised at anything, but still it seems too much even for the Jews. With their enmity with the Muslims.
      1. +3
        4 November 2017 17: 49
        Quote: unwillingly
        Today you won’t be surprised at anything, but still it seems too much even for the Jews. With their enmity with the Muslims.

        Nevertheless, they successfully treat bandits and no hostility prevents them
        The Syrian army advances to the border with Iraq.
      2. +1
        4 November 2017 20: 48
        Such fakes appear regularly. Now from Iran, now from Russia, then from Syria. They never
        not confirmed. There have never been names, bodies, or documents.
        1. +4
          4 November 2017 21: 10
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Such fakes appear regularly ....... There have never been any names, no bodies, or documents.

          What Israeli instructors who are in the ranks of ISIS terrorists with documents confirming their identity go? lol
          And how to distinguish you purely outwardly? Most Jews, like Arabs, are black nosed and circumcised smile
          1. +1
            5 November 2017 13: 12
            Since there are no Israeli instructors in any Arab countries
            doesn’t exist, then you can find them, destroy them with Caliber and Tu-22
            anywhere and in any quantities. No limits, even for a division per day laughing .
            The Iranian embassy transfers money for any such post, why not
            earn? wink
            1. 0
              5 November 2017 17: 20
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Since there are no Israeli instructors in any Arab countries
              There is no

              In the Arab countries, there may not be Israeli instructors, but among various gangster fanatics they clearly exist.
  10. +2
    4 November 2017 16: 48
    good --- Fine, having finished with ISIS, the next stage will begin, by reconciling the parties. But how long it will take depends on the meeting of all parties.
    1. +4
      4 November 2017 17: 28
      It seems that the barmalei will have to drive along BV for a long time , and in Africa.
      1. +1
        4 November 2017 17: 56
        That's for sure. But sometimes we forget about Africa. But without Russia there the issue will not be resolved.
  11. 0
    4 November 2017 17: 27
    This time in the photo I look, parachute bombs are used and with a rocket accelerator ...
    1. PN
      0
      4 November 2017 17: 42
      A photo can be just a photo from the Internet.
  12. +2
    4 November 2017 17: 38
    Quote: professor
    Quote: Chestnut
    World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
    With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

    Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century? request

    Carpet is your favorite pastime patron friend! laughing
    1. 0
      4 November 2017 17: 43
      Quote: Vlad5307
      Quote: professor
      Quote: Chestnut
      World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
      With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

      Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century? request

      Carpet is your favorite pastime patron friend! laughing

      Well, at least one example of bourgeois carpet bombing over the past quarter century? Huh? wink
      1. +3
        4 November 2017 19: 22
        Well, Mosul and Raqqa were destroyed almost completely. And all this confirms.
      2. +2
        4 November 2017 20: 01
        Quote: professor
        bourgeois carpet bombing over the past quarter century?

        Yugoslavia.
        1. 0
          4 November 2017 20: 10
          Quote: Dart2027
          Quote: professor
          bourgeois carpet bombing over the past quarter century?

          Yugoslavia.

          Do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner.


          Quote: Deniska999
          Well, Mosul and Raqqa were destroyed almost completely. And all this confirms.

          Destroyed by carpet bombing?
          1. +1
            4 November 2017 21: 28
            Quote: professor
            Do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner.

            That is, there were not involved about a thousand aircraft? And what is this if not carpet bombing?
            By the way:
            https://topwar.ru/128898-rossiya-osudila-ssha-za-
            nezhelanie-supported-rezolyuciyu-protiv-geroizac
            ii-nacisma.html
            Russia condemned the United States for its unwillingness to support a resolution against the glorification of Nazism. Do not know Israel is not going to condemn the United States?
            1. +3
              4 November 2017 21: 35
              Quote: Dart2027
              Do not know Israel is not going to condemn the United States?

              For good, Israel, as a real "democracy" and "implacable enemy" of any manifestation of Nazism, is simply obliged to impose sanctions against the United States and withdraw its ambassador from this country lol
            2. 0
              4 November 2017 22: 13
              Quote: Dart2027
              That is, there were not involved about a thousand aircraft? And what is this if not carpet bombing?

              Do not confuse warm with soft. The number of aircraft involved is not related to carpet bombing. An example I showed in the photo above. Now it's your turn.

              Quote: Dart2027
              Russia condemned the United States for its unwillingness to support a resolution against the glorification of Nazism. Do not know Israel is not going to condemn the United States?

              I do not know.
              1. 0
                5 November 2017 06: 41
                Quote: professor
                An example I showed in the photo above.
                That is, they didn’t bomb everything that could be bombed there?
                1. 0
                  5 November 2017 10: 43
                  Quote: Dart2027
                  Quote: professor
                  An example I showed in the photo above.
                  That is, they didn’t bomb everything that could be bombed there?

                  That is, they didn’t bomb everything there necessary was to bomb. Namely, 6 bombs, 6 hits and the airfield are disabled.
                  1. 0
                    5 November 2017 13: 29
                    Quote: professor
                    Namely, 6 bombs, 6 hits and the airfield are disabled.

                    And that these six bombs were the only ones? And where did 35000 sorties and more 23000 bombs go?
                    1. 0
                      5 November 2017 15: 11
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      And that these six bombs were the only ones? And where did 35000 sorties and more 23000 bombs go?

                      That's exactly what I ask you.

                      Quote: professor
                      The number of aircraft involved is not related to carpet bombing. An example I showed in the photo above. Now it's your turn

                      Now it's your turn hi
                      1. 0
                        5 November 2017 18: 24
                        Quote: professor
                        That's exactly what I ask you.

                        Actually, I answered you - carpet bombing. Now you.
          2. 0
            5 November 2017 10: 42
            But haven't they been ironed continuously by aviation?
      3. +5
        4 November 2017 20: 21
        Professor, over the past quarter century I will not speak, but over the past 17 years ... Putin is to blame?
  13. +1
    4 November 2017 17: 51
    Really more than these six bombs (500 kg each, only 3 tons) can not be taken on board? Can someone explain why such a colossus flies so far and only 3 tons.
    1. +1
      4 November 2017 18: 31
      In the "colossus" you also need to pour kerosene. And he also has weight.
    2. +1
      4 November 2017 19: 53
      why such a colossus flies so far and only 3 tons.
      - There is an autumn final check in parts of long-range aviation.
    3. +4
      4 November 2017 20: 29
      Well, why are you all so stupid? This is a long-range, crews need to train in combat, a path even without air defense countermeasures. I studied ICE for three years, but until I could make out the clutch with my own hands, I could not understand how it works!
  14. +2
    4 November 2017 17: 57
    Quote: pjastolov
    don't know - I'm not even a god laughing

    Well, Israeli Jews cannot answer this question either, or they just hide the truth
    1. +3
      4 November 2017 18: 09
      Tu-22M3 bombed terrorists in Deir ez-Zor

      Tu 22M3 sent to bomb terrorists training before flight


      TU-22 payload compartment
  15. +4
    4 November 2017 18: 27
    All barmaley and their owners with the hundredth anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution.
  16. 0
    4 November 2017 19: 43
    Perfectly. Toward the close of the war it is necessary to deliver such crushing blows to the militants so that not only the militants, but also our potential opponents are shocked. Resource areas of Syria should be freed as soon as possible. Moreover, the effectiveness and power of strikes should be such that those who plan to strike a terrible blow, for example in the Donbass, think about how dangerous it is for those who try to do it. By the way, it would be very nice to strike a cruise missile from a submarine at fighters not from a distance of 600 kilometers, but from a distance of 2000 kilometers. This is very important and would be a good hint to our enemies who are approaching the western borders of Russia.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +3
    4 November 2017 20: 00
    Quote: DMB_95
    Quote: sabakina
    Sergei, someone here wrote that in the 90s, for the sake of mattresses, the refueling system from TU-22 was removed.

    Yes, the Tu-22M3 does not have a refueling system, although it was provided. "Thank you" to the "peace initiatives" of the Democrats of the 80-90s. Mate is not enough when I remember them.

    If you put a refueling bar, then the Tu-22M3 will become a strategic bomber and will go into the START classification as a strategist, and so it is considered a long-range bomber.
    1. +3
      4 November 2017 20: 34
      As far as I know, a strategist without refueling must fly, launch a rocket and return.
  19. +2
    4 November 2017 21: 24
    To the topic of Syria:
    A year ago, Roida was a teacher at the University of Damascus and specialized in Arabic literature, now she is a militia soldier in the Syrian National Defense Forces.
  20. 0
    4 November 2017 21: 48
    Why do bombs need parachutes?
    To blow the wind further?
  21. +4
    4 November 2017 23: 10
    sabakina, about “Carcasses” without barbells I wrote a couple of days ago. He served as an urgent in Machulishchi near Minsk in 1983-84 after the ShMAS in Engels, served 121 guards Red Banner Sevastopol TBAP on Tu-22. Before Gorbachev, foul play with refueling rods was committed ...
    Professor, the aggression of NATO countries against Yugoslavia, after all, was? Or did the secretaries and assistants not bring you documents on this issue for familiarization and sightseeing?
    1. 0
      5 November 2017 03: 46
      hi What kind of people went, no one knows what, just jokes fool .And doesn’t read to get smarter. TU - 22M3 disassembled on the bones 1000 times and still jokes and banter ... drinks hi
  22. 0
    5 November 2017 00: 08
    And where is Europe? ------ Why doesn’t the ISIS and the USA help? ------- Why are the crazy Danish King “Seals” not bombing, as before, the Syrian government forces? ------- This what is happening? -------- Europe "keeps its nose in the wind"? -------- Did you feel the weakness and near end of the Hegemon? ------- And what will you do without "Hegemon"? ------- You without the USA are just --------- small fry! ------- Yes! ------ You are not some kind of "Civilization" ! ------ Are you just a third world country! --------- Do not agree? ------- Yes, all of you together will not be able to confront not only CHINA AND RUSSIA individually! - ----- You will not be able to withstand both INDIA and Iran and Pakistan and North Korea and Israel and South Africa! -------- CONCLUSION: -------- That's it! "Atlantic civilization" ------- The ERA of CHINA has arrived! --------- Learn Chinese! ------- Pins!
    turn
  23. +1
    5 November 2017 00: 41
    Quote: professor
    Quote: Chestnut
    World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
    With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.

    Who are you trying to convince of the effectiveness of carpet bombing in the 21st century? request

    You write to the mattresses! tongue
  24. 0
    5 November 2017 05: 04
    Quote: Chestnut
    World War II bomber concept. You need to fly over the point and drop bombs.
    With the Papuans it will pass, but they will not reach a serious enemy.
  25. 0
    5 November 2017 14: 35
    Quote: Stilett_71
    Quote: professor
    There are no more or less effective or dangerous weapons, there are more effective and dangerous people
    I absolutely disagree with you.

    And still I will insist. A weapon is a tool with a specific set of technical characteristics; its effectiveness or inefficiency depends on the method and results of the application chosen by the contractor.
    What is preferable to use in battle, an Abrams tank or a rusty rattle hung with iron? The answer seems obvious, however ...
    Everything is decided by the method of application, and in the end the human factor hi
    PS Yes, by the way, your disagreement with my thesis is confirmed by one of my old observations related to different approaches to the so-called "Western" and domestic schools for the development and production of weapons and military equipment. In the west, weapons are made to sell, and in Russia, to fight.

    The pun is not bad, but our weapons are also sold ALMOST EVERYTHING.
  26. 0
    5 November 2017 18: 41
    I apologize for the offtopic, but I noticed in the video of the tractor laid out here to quickly create earthen ramparts that protect equipment and soldiers. Russia also needs to adopt this tactic; for some reason I have not seen many tractors in the Russian Army.
  27. 0
    5 November 2017 19: 33
    The more barmales there perish. The easier it is for us. The less it will make it to us. Yes and less old bombs will destroy the airplanes at our landfills. We could hear the ammunition for more than six months in Shilov landfill. hi
  28. 0
    6 November 2017 01: 15
    Quote: Tests
    sabakina, about “Carcasses” without barbells I wrote a couple of days ago. He served as an urgent in Machulishchi near Minsk in 1983-84 after the ShMAS in Engels, served 121 guards Red Banner Sevastopol TBAP on Tu-22. Before Gorbachev, foul play with refueling rods was committed ...
    Professor, the aggression of NATO countries against Yugoslavia, after all, was? Or did the secretaries and assistants not bring you documents on this issue for familiarization and sightseeing?

    In vain do you refer to the "professor" in "them" (the children of Israel) wassat habit - do not answer uncomfortable questions, this has already been verified!