NATO invasion of Russia - what are the hamsters silent about?

Recently, there have been many rumors on the Internet that Putin allowed the invasion of NATO troops into Russia during popular unrest and man-made disasters. At the same time, the Federal Law 99-FZ of 7 June 2007 g “On ratification of the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces 19 June 1995 g of the Additional Protocol to him. " People who do not know the real facts, can believe in all this nonsense. Let's try to figure out where the truth is, and where the fiction is, using official documents. Immediately make some important reservations:

- all documents that were used in this article are taken from media sites and are in common access;

- I will not quote fully the "Agreement between the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces" from 19 June 1951 g due to the large size of this document, limiting it to individual quotes without breaking context;

- links to documents will be given at the end of the article.

So, let me start from the very beginning, namely, what is the Partnership for Peace program? According to the NATO website:

Partnership for Peace (PfP) is a program of practical bilateral cooperation between individual Euro-Atlantic partner countries and NATO countries. This allows partners to build individual relations with NATO, based on the choice of their own priorities for cooperation.

Based on the commitment to democratic principles that underlie the alliance itself, the Partnership for Peace program aims to increase stability, reduce threats to peace and build strong security relationships between individual Euro-Atlantic partners and NATO, as well as between partner countries .

PfP activities affect almost all areas of NATO activities, including defense, military reform, defense policy and planning, civil-military relations, education and training, military cooperation between military and joint exercises, civil emergency planning and disaster response, as well as scientific and environmental cooperation.

The essence of the PfP program is the partnership created individually between the Euro-Atlantic partner and NATO, taking into account individual needs and jointly implemented level and pace, which the participating States have chosen.

Over the years, the PFP range, tools and mechanisms have been developed to support collaboration through policies, programs, action plans and activities. At the Lisbon meeting in November 2010, as part of a focused reform effort to develop a more efficient and flexible partnership policy, the leaders of the NATO countries decided to take measures to streamline partnership tools with NATO in order to open all joint activities and exercises for partners and harmonization of partnership programs. In the policy of new partnerships, approved by the NATO foreign ministers in Berlin in April, all joint activities and exercises offered by PfP to partners, some programs offered by PfP, a “toolkit” for all partners, be it Euro-Atlantic partners, countries participating in the Mediterranean Dialogue and the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative or global partners.

The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council provides a common political framework for NATO's cooperation with Euro-Atlantic partners and in the framework of bilateral relations between NATO and individual partner countries in the framework of the Partnership for Peace program.

Currently, the Partnership for Peace program consists of 22 countries.

That is, this program is aimed at cooperation on a wide range of issues with individual countries of the Alliance. As an example, you can use the Russian-Norwegian naval exercises, the purchase of "Mistral" in France, etc.

Later, the question arose of how to deal with the status of troops stationed on the territory of another country during, for example, exercises. If with the countries of the Alliance the status of their Forces is regulated by the 19 Agreement of June 1951, then what about those states that are not members of NATO? Thus, the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace Program on the status of their Forces and the Additional Protocol dated 19 June 1995 g. Appeared Below are the full ones:

19 June 1995 г
Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces

States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington 4 on April 1949, and States accepting an invitation to the Partnership for Peace program, issued and signed by the heads of state and government of the Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty in Brussels on January 10, 1994, and which have signed Partnership for Peace Framework Document;

Constituent states participating in the Partnership for Peace program;

Considering that the Forces of one State Party to this Agreement cannot be sent and received by agreement to the territory of another State Party;

Bearing in mind that decisions to send and receive forces will continue to be the subject of separate agreements between the participating States concerned;

Desiring, however, to determine the status of these Forces located in the territory of another participating State;

Referring to the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces, signed in London on June 19 1951;

Agreed on the following:

Article I:
Except as provided for in this Agreement and any Additional Protocol in relation to its own party, all States Parties to this Agreement apply the provisions of the Agreement between the parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces signed in London on June 19 of 1951, hereinafter referred to as SOFA. as if all member states have signed this agreement to the nato SOFA.

Article II:
In addition to this area, to which SOFA NATO applies this Agreement will apply on the territory of all the States Parties to this Agreement that are not parties to NATO SOFA.
For the purposes of this Agreement, references to NATO SOFA and the North Atlantic Treaty are also considered to include the territories referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and references to the North Atlantic Treaty should be considered as including the Partnership for Peace program.

Article III:
In order to implement this Agreement in relation to issues involving Parties that are not Parties to the NATO SOFA, the provisions of the NATO SOFA that are submitted for requests to be submitted and disputes are submitted to the North Atlantic Council, the chairperson of the North Atlantic Council of Deputies or the arbitrator should be interpreted as requiring the parties to be able to agree among themselves, without resorting to external jurisdiction.

Article IV:
This Agreement may be supplemented or modified in accordance with international law.

Article V:
This Agreement will be open for signature by any state that is either a contracting party to NATO SOFA or who has accepted an invitation to participate in the Partnership for Peace program and has signed the Partnership for Peace Framework Document.
This Agreement is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval. Instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all signatory States.
Thirty days later by the three states that signed it, at least one of which is a participant in NATO SOFA and one that accepted the invitation to the Partnership for Peace program and signed the Partnership for Peace Framework Document, which deposited its instruments of ratification , acceptance or approval, this Agreement enters into force in respect of these States. It shall enter into force in respect of each other state that has signed thirty days after the date of the deposit of its ratification.

Article VI:
This Treaty may be denounced by any Party to this Agreement by written notification of denunciation, so that the government of the United States of America will notify all signatories to such notification. Denunciation shall take effect one year after receipt of the notification from the Government of the United States of America. After the expiration of this period of one year, this Agreement shall become null and void with respect to this state, except for settlement of claims arising prior to the day on which denunciation takes effect, but must remain valid for other states.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, duly authorized by their respective governments, have signed this Agreement.

Signed in Brussels, 19 June 1995 of the year,

In English and French, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy, which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. The government of the United States of America sends certified copies to all signatories.


Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace Program on the status of their Forces.

The States Parties to this Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace Program, on the status of their Forces, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement;

Considering that the death penalty is not provided for in accordance with the national legislation of certain parties to the Agreement;

Agreed as follows:

Article I:
Insofar as he has jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, each State Party to this Additional Protocol does not impose the death penalty on any member of the group and its civilian component, and their dependents from any other State Party to this Additional Protocol.

Article II:
This protocol will be open for signature by any of the signatories to the Agreement.

This protocol is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval. Instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all signatories of each such deposit.
This protocol enters into force 30 days after the date of deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval by the three signatories, of which at least one is a member of NATO SOFA, one of which is accepting an invitation to join the program Partnership for Peace, and connected to the Partnership for Peace Program Framework Document.
This Protocol enters into force in respect of each other State that has signed since the date of the deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval to the Government of the United States of America.

Signed in Brussels, 19 June 1995 of the year,

In English and French, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy, which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. The government of the United States of America sends certified copies to all signatories.

Carefully reviewing these documents, you can easily make sure that no NATO invasion in the case of riots and man-made disasters and does not smell. The truth may be objected to me: "And this is stipulated in the Agreement of 19 June 1951 g!". So that there is no doubt, I quote part of this agreement:

Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces

Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington 4 on April 1949,
Considering that the forces of one of the parties can be sent by agreement, to serve, on the territory of the other side;
Considering that the decision to send them and the conditions under which they will be sent, to the extent that conditions are not provided for in this Agreement, continue to be the subject of separate agreements between the parties concerned;
Desiring, however, to determine the status of these forces while in the territory of the other side;
Agreed on the following:

then comes the text of the Agreement itself. As can be seen from the quotation, the direction of troops to another country is determined by agreements. And it will not be Baba Masha from the neighboring entrance, but the top leaders of the countries will agree.

And, as a conclusion, the Federal Law 99-FZ itself. By the way, about the cleanup, which allegedly was conducted on Putin’s orders, is nonsense. I managed to find this document on the legal site “Consultant Plus”. I am sure that if you dig, the document will be on many sites. So:

Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 7 June 2007 g. N 99-FZ "On ratification of the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces from 19 June 1995 and the Additional Protocol to him

Ratify the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated 19 June 1995 of the year, signed on behalf of the Russian Federation in Vilnius 21 April 2005, and the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between States parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated 19 on June 1995, signed on behalf of the Russian Federation in Sofia 28 on April 2006, with the following statement:

in order to implement the Agreement between the States parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces from 19 June 1995, the Russian Federation proceeds from the following understanding of the following provisions of the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces from 19 June 1951 of the Year (hereinafter the Agreement):

1) The provision of paragraph 4 of Article III of the Agreement, which obliges the authorities of the sending state to immediately inform the authorities of the receiving state about cases of non-return to their homeland after the dismissal of a soldier or civilian component, applies to the cases of unauthorized abandonment of the sending state by have them weapons;

2) under the words “possess arms” used in Article VI of the Agreement, the Russian Federation on the basis of reciprocity will understand the use and use of weapons, and the words “supportively consider the requests of the receiving state” means the obligation of the authorities of the sending state to take into account the requirements of the receiving state regarding carrying, transporting, transportation, use and use of weapons;

3) the list of offenses referred to in subsection "c" of paragraph 2 of Article VII of the Agreement is not exhaustive and includes, in addition to those listed for the Russian Federation, other offenses against the foundations of its constitutional structure and security and provided for by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;

4) The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article VII of the Agreement, proceeds from the fact that the authorities of the sending state have the right to exercise their jurisdiction if unidentified persons commit crimes against this state, members of its Forces, civilian component or their families. When establishing the perpetrator, the procedure determined by the Agreement is in force;

5) the assistance referred to in subsection a of paragraph 6 of Article VII of the Agreement is provided in accordance with the law of the requested State. When rendering legal assistance, the competent authorities of the States Parties to the Agreement interact directly, and if necessary, through the relevant higher authorities;

6) The Russian Federation admits the importation of goods and vehicles named in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of Article XI of the Agreement, equipment and material items referred to in paragraph 4 of Article XI of the Agreement, intended for the needs of the Forces, in accordance with the terms of the customs regime of temporary admission, established by the customs legislation of the Russian Federation. Moreover, such importation is carried out with full conditional exemption from payment of customs duties, taxes, fees, with the exception of customs fees for storage, customs clearance of goods and services of this kind outside the designated places or hours of work of customs authorities, and for the time provided for by the Agreement if such dates are expressly specified in the Agreement.

The Russian Federation assumes that the procedure and conditions for the importation of goods referred to in Article XI of paragraph 4 of the Agreement and intended for the needs of the Force will be governed by separate agreements on the direction and acceptance of the Force between the Russian Federation and the sending state.

No provisions of Article XI, including paragraphs 3 and 8, limit the right of the customs authorities of the Russian Federation to take all necessary measures to monitor compliance with the conditions for the importation of goods and vehicles provided for in Article XI of the Agreement, if such measures are necessary in accordance with customs legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation proceeds from the fact that the sending state submits to the customs authorities of the Russian Federation confirmation that all goods and vehicles imported into the Russian Federation in accordance with the provisions of Article XI of the Agreement and separate agreements on the direction and acceptance of the Force between the Russian Federation and the sending state, may be used exclusively for the purpose for which they were imported. If they are used for other purposes with respect to such goods and vehicles, all customs payments stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation must be paid, as well as other requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation must be observed.

The transit of these goods and vehicles is carried out in accordance with the customs legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 11 of Article XI, declares that it allows the import into the customs territory of the Russian Federation of petroleum products intended for use in the operation of service vehicles, aircraft and ships belonging to the Force or the civilian component, with exemption from customs duties and taxes in accordance with the requirements and restrictions established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation permits the importation of vehicles named in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of Article XI of the Agreement and intended for personal use by civilians and their family members in accordance with the conditions of temporary importation, established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation assumes that customs clearance of goods imported (exported) by persons from the civilian component and members of their families intended exclusively for their personal use, including goods for initial acquisition, is free of customs duties, with the exception of customs duties for storage, customs clearance of goods and services of this kind outside of the designated places or hours of work of customs authorities;

7) The Russian Federation also assumes that the documents sent to its competent authorities under the Agreement and the materials attached to them will be accompanied by their certified translations into Russian.

President
Russian Federation
Putin

So, after reading all the documents, we can conclude: the notorious Tanks NATO near Moscow is another myth aimed at destabilizing Russia. No doubt, the authors of this plan hoped that an angry people, without trying to figure it out, would demolish the power in the country. We can assume that this plan has failed.

PS

The agreement was ratified almost 5 years ago, but the hysteria about this issue was raised not by chance. Suffice it to recall how the situation was diligently injected before the presidential election. There is something to think about.

Links to documents:

Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 7 June 2007 g. N 99-FZ "On ratification of the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces from 19 June 1995 and the Additional Protocol to him "- http://www.rg.ru/2007/06/16/partnesrstvo-doc.html

About the Partnership for Peace Program - http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_50349.htm?selectedLocale=en

"Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace Program on the status of their Forces" dated 19 June 1995 g. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_24742.htm

Additional protocol from 19 June 1995 g - http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_24743.htm

"Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Status of their Forces" dated 19 June 1951 g - http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17265.htm

Comments

[domokl]

A wonderful article .. The documents are very interesting and it’s worth reading for the sake of it ... Only in the comments on the documents I don’t really agree ... I’m used to seeing the results, and the results are such that NATO cannot be treated as a neighbor friend ....
But our people are not so stupid as to start a civil war for the sake of NATO .. ​​We remember the blood .. We are not afraid to shed our own (and not someone else's) but we do not forget ...

[Dmitriy69]

NATO’s attempt to change power in Russia using the hostile attitude of Russians towards NATO itself is their cleverest thought in recent times. I can’t believe that she could come into their heads, rather our rats tried.

[older]

The article is useful, but it still smells somehow wrong ... NATO and a friend and an enemy .. It doesn’t happen .. I agree with the domocle, NATO’s results are not in our favor ... So attention to this organization needs to be increased ...

[DYMITRY]

As far as I understand, hamsters expect to take revenge during the inauguration of the GDP, for this they will now remember and twist absolutely any document. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if tomorrow some very clever pseudo-patriot unearths the agreement signed by Svyatoslav Igorevich with the Byzantine Caesar, and from it he will conclude that "Putin is surrendering the country" (tm). So such articles, even possibly more detailed, explaining each point are very much needed. Unconditionally plus.

[Sergh]

The little nurse is dragging a healthy man from the battlefield, is torn. He tells her:
- Come on, save yourself.
- I will not give up.
- Come on, it's hard.
“I have nothing to grab.”
- Stop talking.
- No.
- Well then, at least take off the horse.

[Churchill]

The number of such stuffing will only increase! But the greater the effort to discredit Putin, the higher will be the degree of hatred of NATO and the United States!

[755962]

Another stuffing before the inauguration, .Nothing new.

[Lord of the Sith]

I have already explained to Belolentochny the more they crap on Putin, the more I respect him. But if they begin to praise him as Gorbachev, then write is gone ...

[Grease monkey]

Poorly this author fulfills his "thirty pieces of silver". FZ-99 is just part of the high treason of Putin and his team. The part does not allow us to understand the whole. Here is an article - about the whole https://pravorub.ru/viewpoint/16752.html - this time.
The very question of the status of foreign troops on our land was to be decided by the people themselves, and not by their well-fed and thieves' leadership in the person of the patria "edro" in the Duma and the tandem in the Kremlin and the government house. Do not put everything upside down and push the hysteria about hamsters here. People like Evgeny Nikishov are more like well-fed nerdy hamsters. The very fact that there is a legitimate possibility of a foreign military presence on our soil is that good and should not be a concern? This is cynicism ... We had, are and will have our own forces and our own army, and we do not need this globalization and the WTO. They only need our natural resources from us.
Pe Xie you ponder on the hypocrisy and deception of the very name - "Partnership for Peace". Maybe someone will remember when NATO brought peace to someone? You can also talk about UN peacekeeping missions (my friend came with this one and the Russian base was already removed there), but not as NATO as a "partner for peace" - this is ridiculous.

[Sarus]

It is incomprehensible of course all this ...
What is the point of signing and what is the point of fanning hysteria if all type is top ...
Although all the elections have passed .. Maybe it’s just the excitement to raise against V.V. Putin, or everything is much worse ...
It would be easier to write ... Either NATO in Russia, or NATO can do everything in Russia ..

[YARY]

I know one thing; as soon as they begin to write "explanations" of "additions" to a simple concept, it means they are fooling us!
How many such deceptions were there? Scary to remember! So why are we catching again? Probably because we do not demand an answer from the authorities ?!

[Churchill]

I wonder what kind of reaction will follow when the Americans begin to praise Putin, with and without reason. Praise in order to praise!

[Jaromir]

The reaction will follow hysterical: Well, here! What did we tell you! Putin is a traitor, tyrant and enemy of democracy! .. Unfortunately, Russia is a country of extremes! And someone, I even guess who, will definitely play on this!

[Igarr]

Useful article.

I will say one thing. Whatever beautiful documents are accepted - the state as long as the state - so far can reinforce its arguments with brute force.
Army, aviation, navy. Reliable economy.
We know an example of this.
So let Russia become so - powerful, strong, toothy.
And Russia has always honored treaties.

[older]

Now I’ll bring you a red flag in my hand so that I can stand as a warrant officer of imperial times on the battlefield ... The army is always needed, we’re even tired of talking about it ... Only the army of the army is different ...

[Rashid]

In my opinion, hamsters just don't need this - to incite people against NATO. "Sensation" comes from our jingoistic patriots, such as the failed presidential candidate Ivashov.

[Ascetic]

Quote: Rashid

In my opinion, hamsters just don't need this - to incite people against NATO. "Sensation" comes from our jingoistic patriots, such as the failed presidential candidate Ivashov.

By the way, an interesting metamorphosis is happening with the "hamsters", if literally last year before the elections at all levels our "non-systemic opposition" literally persuaded the people not to be afraid of NATO because they are already weak and worthless fighters. Quoting the notorious "hamster"
I. Yashina
,

do not overestimate NATO's capabilities. In the eyes of the jingoistic patriots, the Alliance looks like an invincible military machine capable of crushing any resistance in a matter of days. In practice, we see a completely different picture: NATO troops were bogged down in Afghanistan for many years, where they are opposed by ragamuffins with Kalash, only at the cost of tremendous efforts and significant losses control the situation in Iraq, barely fulfilling the assigned combat missions in Libya, periodically covering allied rebel troops with bombing. Given the economic difficulties of the United States and Europe, NATO is unlikely to be able to wage a serious military campaign anywhere in the next 10-15 years. And it’s all the more foolish to expect any kind of aggression against a country with nuclear weapons.

Now, if you believe the article, they have changed their colors in ardent patriots, the NATO base in Ulyanovsk, the training of future officials-colabrocyanists, Putin is preparing Russia for surrender, etc. What is it for? Why did they suddenly change tactics? The answer is simple. Do you remember their puppeteer McFaall was surprised at the huge level of anti-Americanism in Russia? Therefore, you cannot raise a protest wave among the broad masses on the basis of "love" for NATO and the values ​​of the liberal West as a whole and on blaming the current government, you can only embitter these masses against themselves. Now they have changed their tactics,
having repainted themselves as patriots of Russia, they began to accuse the Russian authorities of betraying the interests of the Motherland precisely by the facts of cooperation with NATO (America seems to have nothing to do with it, after all, accusing Putin of "love" for the United States is naive, but NATO may well fail). The goal is still the same - to "saddle" the patriotic feelings of the people, to sow distrust in the authorities, to overthrow the power in Russia that is undesirable to their overseas masters.
The "evolution" of the current ruling stratum towards state patriotism is very annoying for our friends from overseas. Therefore, the task of the "hamsters" is set to one - to prove by all means to the people that this is not patriotism, but a disguised plan to "surrender the country."

[Ascetic]

The technology of this business is as simple as an orange orange. The long-forgotten "technical" Law is brought into the light of day within the framework of the SNR (Russia-NATO Council) program, which has been in effect for decades, a convenient moment is chosen (the difficulties of amers with Pakistan) are presented in the right light through the media and the Internet, and all this is brought almost to the level of popular referendums.
I already gave an assessment in the article NATO, Putin, "prospects ..." who is interested
Here is the link
My webpage
I’m ashamed to admit, but still I’ll tell you how, using similar technologies of psychological warfare, we hooliganed or made fun of the people as young people say in the Gorbostroy era. In this store there was a periodically empty department that was used when importing a large batch of goods, so as not to create kilometer-long queues and unload other departments. The three of us stood silently near the counter and imitated a queue to an absolutely empty department without goods and a seller. Gradually people came up and asked: "What are you waiting for, guys ?;
-Yes, the sausage SHOULD be delivered here in the queue and occupied. (This is not a hoax, she really should be asked when). Gradually, an impressive queue formed behind us, and we quietly went one by one to "smoke." Then everything developed according to a revolutionary scenario under the slogan: "Give me some sausage!" with the angry outrageous mass of the people and the frightened manager and salespeople, shocked from an unknown source of excitement: "Who told you about the sausage?"
- We don't know anything. People have seen. They will not lie. The bastards got caught! Let's go to the warehouse! "In general, the noise scandal and wild screams.
In modern conditions, all this is filmed on a camera and laid out on the Internet. Here you have popular protests and dissatisfaction with the authorities.
And try to find fault with the "real culprits", about whom no one remembers.

[admiral]

Bravo, Ascetic! An example is more than indicative! Manipulation by the crowd is indeed a simple matter! And such nonsense tokmo will grow!

[Ruslan]

Quote: Ascetic

The technology of this case is simple.

If it were like you write it would be too easy. You analyze history and find patterns that the West uses against Russia - they are repeated. For example, the West - seeing that Russia cannot be defeated in the First World War - the current split society into successful people - tuned to pro-Western values ​​(today's hamsters) and people who were socially thrown (peasantry and people living in the outback). In February, who committed the revolution? - rightly, hamsters led by Kerensky (Navalny) - but it was a distracting maneuver (they knew that people would not support hamsters) immediately prepared their own group in a throwing camp led by Lenen, Trotsky and Sverdlov. And these heroes, allegedly fighting hamsters (in fact, Kerensky received instructions from the west to help Lenin) come to power. You see what a multi-way it doesn’t remind you of what? Who is Mr. Putin? analogue of Lenin and Trotsky or Stalin who was able to deceive everyone and return the country to the people? To give an answer to this question, you look at what Putin has done in 15 years of power, and what about Stalin? Stalin took away strategic enterprises from private hands so that capital would not pericate to the west, but Mr. Putin? Stalin eliminated social inequality and unified the country before the war, and Mr. Putin?
Stalin developed the hinterland of the country by building new enterprises for the hospital school - and Mr Putin? Well and so on ..

[Paratov]

If Putin does not want to be in the trash of history, he will have to study Joseph Vissarionovich’s strategy tightly!

[bashkort]

No, it’s better we’ll enter them - in the Netherlands itself. The joke is old, but I still like it.

[Dmitriy69]

NATO’s attempt to change power in Russia using the hostile attitude of Russians towards NATO itself is their cleverest thought in recent times. I can’t believe that she could come into their heads, rather our rats tried.

[older]

What an interesting thought ... We need to think ... The Orange Revolution in the wake of hatred of NATO .. ​​An interesting solution, the main thing is not standard ... The NATO leadership, by the way, considered the option of national-patriots coming to power .. The option for NATO is not quite bad...

[olegyurjewitch]

Quote: older

The Orange Revolution in the wake of hatred of NATO .. ​​An interesting decision, the main thing is not standard ... The NATO leadership, by the way, considered the option of national patriots coming to power .. The option for NATO is not entirely bad ...

Why not standard? Very predictable. Most of the villages of our country do not even know about the existence of these documents. We have long had a stereotype -NATO enemy! And if our forces, which are aimed at destabilization, have not rolled one option, it may turn out another. In this case, playing on patriotic feelings can give positive results. However, this did not work. The people learned to see in the actions of politicians what is needed and what is not.

[mind1954]

All these 34% and those that were given for EP and GDP show
only one thing: WHAT NUMBER OF PEOPLE DO WE HAVE IN THE COUNTRY?
stuck, more or less successfully, to the flows of stolen money !!!

They do not want to think about tomorrow and believe that for their time
and their children will be enough, and some dream that, and suddenly, succeed
steal yourself or children! So in dreams of possible
future profits, they are already selling the country today !!!

[Shohmansur]

I agree from and to!

[Vanek]

mind1954

So I think that the number 34 is taken from that top, beautiful picture. But what color - red or green?

[Z.A.M.]

mind1954

I agree ...

[Vanek]

Quote: mind1954

more or less successfully, to the flows of stolen money !!!

I work as a forwarder in a small office s / n 25000 - no flows of stolen money.

Quote: mind1954

They do not want to think about tomorrow

From day to day, the little son will go to kindergarten, his wife is pregnant, and plans a third child.

Quote: mind1954

So in dreams of possible
future profits

With his wife a month an average of 55-60000. Enough for everything, an apartment, two cars and every summer we go on vacation.

Quote: mind1954

they are already selling the country today

With all of the above, unlike some I don’t go to swamp and other areas. And I’m not going to.

I have two grandfathers from that war did not return. To whom will I sell the country? Granny is a labor veteran and home front worker. To whom will I sell the country?

[Shohmansur]

The author you are the hamster. NATO is already in Russia. The city of Ulyanovsk. But just recently, before the election, Dima threatened to answer the United States for deploying a missile defense system, while a howl rises in Russia when other people's ships enter Sevostopol.
While yelling and yelling, such yankees were written by the Yankees, we have created a base.
When it reaches you, in Russia there are no right and guilty, in Russia, CITIZENS of the Russian Federation live. And NATO is the enemy of the Democrats, the centrists, and the left. All who inhabit the territory from the Baltic Sea to the Pacific Ocean!

[alexng]

And where is the confirmation that NATO is already in Russia? Just do not bring Western media and liberal sites or blogs. Red sites also do not need to be cited, there are more lies than in the Western media.

[Shohmansur]

Why don’t you like liberal websites or blogs? Red sites than you do not like? What is the difference between CNN and 1TV?

[alexng]

They do not like the fact that there is not a single confirmation and links to documentary references on any issues laid out in the articles are not given. The complete haze and confusion. As a result, the Internet turns into a garbage dump and a garbage dump of someone else’s mind.

- There are many mysterious and incomprehensible things in the world!
And the more hamsters sit on the Internet and stir up something, the more mysterious and incomprehensible for everyone ...

[Shohmansur]

"You are an insect without a piece of paper." Live my friend on a piece of paper. And I prefer to live in reality (not virtual). NATO will drive us heroin from Afghanistan, and we will help them by creating a transshipment point in Ulyanovsk. And let the patriots shout "Hands off Sevastopol" at this time.

[kNow]

who about what, and pohmonsur about heroin

[CEO]

You're lying !!!!!! I have friends in Ulyanovsk, did not see NATO there)))))) Or are you just trolling ??

[Shohmansur]

Director, are you out of your mind? What nonsense are you talking about? And you and the author troll - a hamster!

[Cynic]

Quote: Shohmansur

And you and the author troll - a hamster!

The correct option is chosen when there is nothing to say in response:
To say more about

[olegyurjewitch]

Quote: Shohmansur

NATO is already in Russia. City Ulyanovsk

About Ulyanovsk have already explained enough, do not be lazy, re-read all the publications, they are on the site. Regarding Sevastopol. Unfortunately, Sevastopol is under the jurisdiction of Ukraine, and the fact that our base of the Black Sea Fleet is located there does not mean anything. Well, finally, RUSSIA did not raise a howl about the entry of NATO ships into ports belonging to another state, but expressed its concerns on this occasion.

[Art111]

Damn, again a tantrum.

[Uralm]

What nonsense. Not serious at all

[Artur09-75]

NATO is an enemy of Russia. And the point is, any documents would not be signed.

[DYMITRY]

Quote: Artur09-75

any documents would not be signed.

Fascist Germany was also an enemy of the USSR, however, the Molotov-Ribentrop Pact delayed the start of the war by almost 2 years. He also did not have to sign?

[AkzoNobel]

you and others are misleading out of your understanding ... Germany was not a fascist ... Social Democrats, yes, but not fascists ... all questions regarding fascism to the Duce ... however, it argues about the advisability of signing the Molotov-Ribentrop Pact I won’t be either ... because we only know what we decided to announce and nothing more ... nobody will ever voice the true reasons to you, let alone me ... those in power will not tell the truth, because responsibility must be held for the truth ...

[sergo0000]

The article is useful and timely. Thanks to the author for clarification.
Plus. But even here it’s hard to convince me that even one NATO warrior in Ulyanovsk is good!

[Yves762]

From the actions of NATO, instability in the world is only growing, which is a great basis for the development and growth of terrorism. The same Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria are now a clear confirmation of this. It is very doubtful that NATO assistance is in Russia's interests ...

[Charon]

Article minus.
But not because references to documents are unconvincing, but just for that, for documents.
There is no need to rustle with papers. As a minimum, because in addition to official documents there may be secret agreements.
If our leadership agrees to the intervention and orders the troops not to interfere, it will be too late to shake the agreements signed, and there will be no one. And especially for the meticulous, they will retroactively sign the new.

If we talk about the theoretical possibility of an invasion, then other questions must be posed:
1. Why do people think Putin can turn in the country? So, how didn’t they decide to do it with Gorbaty and Yeltsin?
2. Why do not warlike rhetoric and rearmament give people confidence in the trustworthiness of the popular elect?
3. Human rights defenders, in theory, such a democratic invasion should be welcomed in every possible way. Patriots must protest. How did it happen that both agents of foreign influence and patriots of the country oppose the government? Who are our rulers for us? How did they manage to get to this?

This is what should be discussed, and not about who and why escalates hysteria.

[Brother Sarych]

Very accurate comments on your part!
I completely and completely agree with you - how could this happen that power became an enemy for Westerners and for patriots? this, in principle, cannot be ...
And what kind of power is this?

[Shohmansur]

Carrier of the dead, sensible comment!

[UV58]

human rights defenders generally poher for democracy, they are not paid for it. they are paid to rock society and undermine confidence in government. and the reason for their activity is not important - even though the arrival of democracy in the form of NATO, even though its departure, everything is just an occasion.

they wave their flags with one hand against the alleged violation of the sovereignty of our lands near Ulyanovsk, and the other they sell the Kuril Islands to the Japs.

bidding and revelations about the State Department from ponamaryov did not bother? believe them?

for example, I don’t believe that Rogozin can betray the homeland.

[Z.A.M.]

Charon

Very true comments.
The more often, you ask yourself such questions, the more the idea of ​​venality and betrayal of the country's leadership is strengthened.
Why "to myself"? And to whom? The leaders “rule in silence,” “they don't give up their own people.” Even thieves and fools ....

[Jaromir]

Another game of politicians! Who signed what, and most importantly, why, it will become known only 50 years later, after declassification!

[Jaromir]

Who are these human rights defenders ?! In all my life I have never seen a single human rights defender! Human rights activists are a cartoon on TV! ..

[admiral]

I will report an unpleasant sight to you, Jaromir! Lizizrel of two. One, like Boris Moiseyev, the other, or rather the other - almost Novodvorskaya! ..

[Cynic]

Quote: Charon

are agents of foreign influence and patriots of the country opposing the authorities?

Who is this ? In the sense of patriots and akhenty?
And by the way, you as an intelligent person, understand perfectly well that what you wrote means that you, at a minimum, do not attribute power to patriots.
Hmm, it turns out to the akhents too. Then who is she our power?
In life, it now turns out that any indecency is created by shouting that power is bad, that’s good.
People forgot who Lucifer was.

[welder]

I really didn’t understand a damn thing (probably stupid, stupid but physically developed), but it seemed that there was a brainwashing of the minds covering the possible location of NATO cargo, etc. in the territory of the Russian Federation ...... As Yura Shevchuk-horn masmedia says, they will instill a new taste

[patriot2]

Just take appropriate measures around the Ulyanovsk base. Our landing in Ulyanovsk is already training, add a little air defense, and mine fields around the base will not hurt. In general, a matter of technology.
And the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, although it delayed the start of the war, but created the illusion for the entire USSR that there would be no war. The result is millions of dead.
Gunpowder must be kept dry and not be fooled by the sweet words of NATO!

[UV58]

what minefields ?? there will be no base in Ulyanovsk.

[CEO]

It seems that in the article the author laid out everything on the shelves. But no, there are still people who either can not read or think. All the same, they don’t give a damn to the tank with honey. Already shown that this is honey, but no, look, the color is not like that. About this base in Ulyanovsk, children already understand everything. Pay attention to some writers who take the discussion thread the other way. The main idea of ​​such scribblers is to inspire us with Russian people. To all Russians (Russians), as my tactics teacher Colonel Kim said, we need to be friends with Russians. I got distracted. So, to impress upon us that everything is bad with us, everything is lost, everyone has betrayed us, we are to blame for the fact that we are Russians. I put PLUS to the author of the article ... By the writer Troll MINUS.

[Shohmansur]

Before writing a text, what did you use? Or are they just so illiterate that they cannot express their thoughts clearly and evenly ?!
Russian (Russians) - how is this possible ?!
I got distracted. So, to impress upon us that everything is bad with us, everything is lost, everyone has betrayed us, we are to blame for the fact that we are Russians. You have an inferiority complex ?!
From your comment, I liked only one sentence: By the writer Troll MINUS. For which I’m minus you with great pleasure!

[Ruslan]

The real danger for Russia can only be posed by the Russians themselves - this was the conclusion reached by Western analysts in the course of numerous attempts to conquer this territory by force. The West needs to split society so that they become irreconcilable enemies. The first and the main one is the split of socio-economic. One side is people who have wealth at the level that allows them to use Western goods values ​​- and therefore are closely tied to them economically (bank accounts, child education, etc.) and morally. The second group - these are people on the outskirts of the dying regions and settlements who realize that the first group took the opportunity to fill their pockets and lives happily ever after. The main indicator of this split is the huge difference in the development of the social base in cities and its complete absence in the rest of the country, with the exception of very few districts. Try to leave your metropolis and you immediately find yourself in the Stone Age.
The socio-economic split will entail a national and religious split in the country. "ENOUGH TO FEED THE CAUCASUS", and the like. Read the latest news about the intensification of separatist movements in the regions of the country - there is something to think about.
All these rearmament of the army, patriotic rhetoric, is similar to the Potemkin villages - for this divided society will collide with each other. Any government that really wants to protect its people - begins with the nationalization of strategic enterprises - whose capital should work for the people of the country and not the West - those who own these enterprises bring the income from these enterprises to the shields of Western banks, and in the meantime, settlements throughout the country are simply dying out due to the lack of the necessary social base.

[Vlaleks48]

I repeat! Words by Russian writer Valentin Rasputin:
The Russian people are no worse and no better than everyone else. HE IS OTHER.

And one more thing: There seems to be no reason for faith, but I believe that the West will not receive Russia ... I believe - we will remain an independent country, independent, living its own way, which is thousands of years old. However, Russia will never have an easy life. OUR WEALTH IS TOO TARGET.

On my own, the creation of a transshipment base in Ulyanovsk is only the beginning, then the motivation for making profit from trading in my native country can roll like a snowball. And the Kuril Islands and the Far East, but you can’t say everything.

[UV58]

+1, comrade!

[UV58]

and amid liberal cries about NATO bases, the Ponamarev trades islands with the Japanese ...

[Vanek]

Quote: Shohmansur

NATO will drive us heroin from Afghanistan, and we will help them by creating a transshipment point in Ulyanovsk. And let the patriots shout "Hands off Sevastopol" at this time.

How is it possible and who puts pluses for such?

[Shohmansur]

Do you also profit from the destruction of the population of Russia by "white death"? Put a minus, I don't care, I expressed my point of view!

[Vanek]

I won’t put anything to you

Quote: Vanek

from Afghanistan as well we we will help them

I already have an opinion about you.

[Shohmansur]

You stressed "WE". That is how WE, perhaps YOU do not live in Russia and YOU are not its citizen. But we now have what we have. We let the creatures who filled up the Fatherland with heroin to our home. WE go out in crowds on the square opposite each other. This is all WE, this is all OUR Russia. And you...

[Vanek]

Quote: Shohmansur

WE go out in droves in the square opposite each other

It is what it is.

And I live in Russia, in Novosibirsk, in my passport in black and white "RUSSIAN".
Your comment for heroin from Afghanistan did not understand correctly. (the Internet cannot convey the tone, the feelings, the emotions)

[Shohmansur]

Is it a matter of nationality? For example, I am Ukrainian, so what? I really did not like the article! I expressed my opinion! All that top that went out and went on strike (for or against it does not matter) will leave the country in case of what. We will remain to disentangle.
We live here, and I don’t understand what all these numerous people with billions of dollars in foreign banks do. One thing is clear, in which case they will call both NATO and sell their souls to the devil. As for the base in Ulyanovsk, it may not be built, but thanks to what? Awakened conscience? No, thanks to us raising the butch.
PS Novosibirsk is a great city. Whenever possible I go to you, and every time I go to the Opera and Ballet Theater!

[Vanek]

Quote: Shohmansur

PS Novosibirsk is a great city. Whenever possible I go to you, and every time I go to the Opera and Ballet Theater!

Thank you.

PS Do not forget about emotions, we are all people.

[kNow]

Oh, are you already Ukrainian? Tajiks so zealously defend

[Hleb]

in the passport in black and white "RUSSIAN".

I also want such a passport

[kNow]

Well, of course, the Russians are also to blame for letting you into your house. What arrogance .. Do you think this justifies your trade in heroin?

[Daka]

It is possible to write long and beautifully about European "universal" values ​​and principles of democracy, but, unfortunately, the fact remains: Almost all recent military conflicts (at least from the West) are conducted with the aim of gaining unhindered access to today or in the near future impoverished natural resources of our planet. Therefore, it is quite natural to expect that the contradictions and passions between different actors will only grow, and sooner or later (with high probability) will lead to a serious military conflict between key global players. A serious struggle for natural resources awaits us, in comparison with which today's "Middle East crisis" will seem like ordinary children's fun. In this regard, the richest country in the world in terms of the total level of natural resources (resources), and besides, with a virtually dilapidated army and a sluggishly recovering economy will be a very tasty morsel.
The whole question does not rest on the mentality of certain peoples or on political realities, but on banal human greed on the one hand and on the instinct of self-preservation on the other.
In short, NATO, in principle, cannot be an ally of Russia, as the aggressive intentions, supported by economic fears and ambitions, are hidden in the root of this alliance. The PRC can only be temporary to them, and then only until that moment until it is firmly on its feet.

[Lord of the Sith]

At the same time in "democratic" Japan

Execution in Japan: authorities hide what suicide bombers are guilty of

Three criminals were hanged in Japan on Thursday. For the Land of the Rising Sun, this is far from an ordinary event. The names of the suicide bombers were not disclosed. Like the reason they were executed. The last time the Japanese authorities resorted to capital punishment more than a year and a half ago, reports Reuters.

The execution of three people was personally approved by the Minister of Justice of Japan, Toshio Ogawa. Criminals were hanged in different prisons located in Tokyo, Hiroshima and Fukuoka. The names of the suicide bombers are unknown. Moreover, the authorities do not even report why each of them was sentenced to death. It is only known that in 1999, one of three attackers killed five people at a railway station in western Japan.

The last time the death penalty was applied in the Land of the Rising Sun in July 2010. Then two criminals were sentenced to be hanged. According to some reports, one of them killed two people, and the second - six. Currently, 132 people are languishing in Japanese death row cells. Among them are followers of the cult of the Apocalypse, who in 1995 sprayed deadly gas in the Tokyo subway. According to a sociological survey conducted in 2009, 86% of Japanese people support the death penalty.

Journalists find it difficult to explain why death sentences in Japan are carried out no more than once every one and a half to two years. Laws governing the frequency of executions do not exist in the country. Be that as it may, the number of such sentences worldwide has increased over the past year. According to the report of the international human rights organization Amnesty International, at least 676 people from 20 different countries were killed by the authorities in 2011. For comparison, in 2010, 527 criminals were executed around the world.

According to international human rights activists, the most bloodthirsty country in this regard is China. More people are executed there annually than in all other countries of the world combined.

[Prophet Alyosha]

I'm against! All these paper arguments are not worth a damn! I know firmly the one-leg of an enemy soldier for NO reason should not step on our land! NATO is a clear enemy and cooperation with the enemy is a betrayal!

[rate 60]

http://svoim.info/201212/?12_1_1

The betrayal of the motherland is already happening at the very top, and even with an open discussion of the cost of this action. Officials are ready to allow the creation of a NATO military base on the territory of Russia, hiding behind the words about possible benefits ...

According to the newspaper Kommersant, V. Putin is ready to approve a government decree on the creation in Ulyanovsk of a base for the transit of NATO military cargo from Afghanistan. Officials are eager to help their NATO colleagues - rampant peddlers of democracy - save on transportation costs and joyfully rub their hands, foreseeing the possibility of getting a “tip” for selling their homeland. Let's take a closer look at what trade in the sovereignty of a country can turn into.

Ulyanovsk is the country's most important transportation hub, the routes passing through it connect the European part of Russia with the Urals and Siberia. The central waterway of the country, the Volga River, passes through Ulyanovsk, there is a large port and the largest railway and automobile bridges. There are three large airports in the city, including military and international. Why NATO is interested in building a base here is just understandable, but why does our (or not our?) Government allow us to build an enemy military base on the territory of a large scientific and industrial center, in which a number of secret defense enterprises are located?

Ulyanovsk, despite the powerful production base of military weapons, is itself practically unarmed. At the moment, all military universities have been eliminated in the city. The 104th Guards Airborne Division was located in the city, but it was reduced to a brigade. But the brigade is in the city only in peacetime, that is, at any time it can be sent anywhere in the country, or rather, even the world - to extinguish another conflict. And then in Ulyanovsk there will be two McDonald's and an American base full of weapons. We still had a large arsenal, but even that “accidentally” exploded in 2009 ...

By the way, in the region is the Research Institute of Atomic Reactors (NIIAR), which conducts more than 80% of all complex Russian tests in research nuclear reactors. It would be useful to recall the high-profile election promises of American presidential candidates to kill Russian nuclear physicists without a twinge of conscience. One more reason for the creation of the base in Ulyanovsk looms here - annual international conferences, of course, are best held under the supervision of the NATO military with the timely shooting of the most talented scientists.

So why do we need an American base in this place - a center for sabotage, espionage and a springboard for the quartering of the country ??

In the case of its creation, the inevitable import of drugs from Afghanistan into our territory will be only the tip of the iceberg. Americans can bring any weapon, including nuclear weapons, into the country - in this case, the existence of a missile defense system makes no sense.

Let us recall the law N2007-ФЗ signed by Putin in 99, which allows NATO forces to occupy Russia without a fight.

Maybe this is the beginning of the occupation ?!

According to this law, NATO can introduce its contingent to our territory in the event of technological disasters or civil unrest. From this point of view, the base is being built right on time ...

The creation of an enemy base on the territory of a sovereign state is an undermining of national security, a betrayal, no matter what words they try to disguise. The concentration of enemy soldiers in a sovereign state can only be in the form of mass graves, and enemy weapons can only be in the form of trophies.

No need to stick a blade of an enemy base into a living body of the country! We are not dead! We just haven't woken up yet ...

Does the intervention begin?

The legend under which the deployment of the NATO base is justified is completely meaningless. When using air transportation of goods from Afghanistan, the base in Ulyanovsk is not needed. All this is much simpler and cheaper to do in the southern direction, transferring to the ports of Qatar, Oman, the Emirates with transshipment immediately to the ships and relying on the existing infrastructure.

This means that the tasks of the base are other than the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. Theoretically, there are two of them:

1. Organization of a NATO base in the area of ​​the Strategic Missile Forces base to take control of the Russian nuclear arsenal under certain conditions.

2. Participation in the war against Iran. In this case, NATO will act on the part of the Caspian Sea, relying on the infrastructure and reserves in Samara. Iran is practically defenseless from the Caspian side, and there is no simpler and more reliable way to get to Tehran. It is enough to land special forces units on the Caspian coast to completely disrupt all Persian defense plans.

Damir KYARIMOV, Ulyanovsk

[FiremanRS]

5+ article! Everything is clear, clear, understandable. I agree with the conclusions of the aftor. The comments are varied, but the trend is also clear. Guys, as I understand it, no one is going to lick NATO under the ass, this is all clearly indicated in the law, in the supplements. We are not in a state of war and in pre-war state with a bloc. Therefore, agreements take place and are valid in both directions. Nevertheless, I think it’s not a discovery for anyone that the pike in the lake would be awake. I suggest considering further speculations on this subject a troll and ignoring.

[dmitryg]

It’s time to get out of a 30-year-old coma. The Cold War is lost, and NATO is no longer the enemy. Ordinary Americans, by the way, according to polls do not consider Russia an enemy. And the Russians are spraying saliva and snot.
An ordinary American wanted to sneeze at some kind of Russia, he was worried about the news and problems of his city, state and country. And here - if only to look at others and find fault - it's easier for "offline hamsters" to distract from internal problems.

Better dead than Red!

[OilGas2011]

Igarr: And Russia has always honored treaties.,

[Aslan Isaevich Arsamekov]

Quote: domokl

A wonderful article .. The documents are very interesting and it’s worth reading for the sake of it ... Only in the comments on the documents I don’t really agree ... I’m used to seeing the results, and the results are such that NATO cannot be treated as a neighbor friend ....
But our people are not so stupid as to start a civil war for the sake of NATO .. ​​We remember the blood .. We are not afraid to shed our own (and not someone else's) but we do not forget ...

I completely agree with you. NATO was created only to combat the alleged "Russian aggression"

[Edelweiss_2]

General Ivashov about the agreement with NATO on the seizure of Russia