Raid on Constanza

17
In the famous raid of a detachment of ships of the Soviet Black Sea fleet On June 26, 1941, the destroyers of Moscow and Kharkov took part in the Romanian port city of Constanta.

By the beginning of the war, the Black Sea Fleet in terms of the number of warships was significantly superior to the naval forces of Germany’s allies - Romania and Bulgaria. It consisted of ships of all classes: 1 battleship, 5 cruisers, 3 leader, 13 destroyers, 4 gunboats, 12 sentry ships, 15 minesweepers, 21 small hunter, 81 torpedo boat, 44 submarines.

Raid on Constanza


The Romanian naval forces opposing the Soviet Black Sea Fleet numbered 4 destroyers, 3 destroyers, 1 submarines and 10 minesweeper boats. Bulgaria had 4 destroyer, 2 patrol ship and 5 patrol boats. Germany, before 1942, did not have its own ships on the Black Sea.

On June 25, 1941, the People's Commissar of the Navy N. Kuznetsov approved the raid plan presented to him by the command of the Black Sea Fleet, with the goal of destroying oil tanks in Constanta and reconnaissance of the enemy’s naval base. To achieve the goals indicated in the plan, an attack group of ships was created consisting of the leaders Moscow and Kharkov and three groups aviation Black Sea Fleet. To assist the strike group was a ship support group, consisting of the cruiser Voroshilov and the destroyers Soobrazitelny and Smyshlenny.

In the evening of June 25 1941 of the year, the strike group of ships left Sevastopol. The transition to the area of ​​hostilities passed without interference. In 5 hours of the morning, the leaders went to the combat course and from the distance 130 cable (24 km.) Opened fire on oil storage facilities in the port of Constanta.

The silhouettes of the ships of the shock group very clearly loomed against the bright background of the horizon and soon the return fire of the German coastal 280-mm Tirpitz battery was covered by the leading Moscow leader, and the Kharkov had damaged the close shells of the projectiles. bringing the ship to 6 nodes. At the signal of the group commander, the ships, hiding behind a smoke screen, began to depart. And at this time the torpedo fired by the Soviet submarine Shch-206 gets into the left side of the boiler compartment of Moscow.

The commander of the U-206 submarine, Captain Karakai, from the first day of the war carried out patrol service in a given area, but the command did not inform him of the forthcoming operation of his surface fleet. Karakai took the "Moscow" for the Romanian destroyer "Regina Maria", very similar in its silhouette to the Soviet leader and dealt him a mortal blow.

As a result of the explosion "Moscow" broke into two parts and quickly went to the bottom. However, Karakai did not stop there, but went on a new attack, already on Kharkov. "U-206" launched two torpedoes, but the leader managed to deviate from them. Meanwhile, the destroyer "Smart" approached and his commander A. Vorkov showed himself in this situation from the most flawless side. The destroyer attacked, as he believed, the enemy boat, passing over the place of the volley and dropped two series of depth charges. After their rupture, black oil spots appeared on the surface. A few minutes later, near the destroyer, the feed and part of the cabin of the Soviet submarine Shch-206 quickly surfaced and quickly sank. This was evident from the "smart" and "Kharkov".
The boat quickly sank, and both ships lay on the opposite course.

As for the results of the shelling of Constanta, the tank farms in the port remained intact. The railway track and the station building were slightly damaged.

The Romanian boats and seaplanes saved 69 crew members, including the commander of the leader "Moscow".

For obvious reasons, none of the eyewitnesses could say anything about the details of this fatal raid. Among other things, these details could have a demoralizing effect on the personnel of the fleet. After all, it was only the fifth day of the war ...
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Brother Sarych
    +4
    29 March 2012 09: 17
    The bitter page of our history is the senseless death of people and valuable ships ...
    In general, the leadership of the Black Sea Fleet woke up a lot, to put it mildly ...
    1. 0
      9 February 2017 15: 35
      to put it mildly a pretty non-professional article! belay most likely the leader was blown up at a minefield, and about the Shch-206 submarine in general a fairy tale! fool
  2. Rodver
    +2
    29 March 2012 09: 51
    Damn it, this is a binding! It’s good that the whole fleet didn’t go, and that would be the case ... In general, the recognizable Soviet style - stupid and without much imagination - the main order should be executed. They didn’t even bother to save their comrades - the gentlemen of the Romanians took care ...
  3. 755962
    +2
    29 March 2012 10: 00
    Karakai mistook "Moscow" for the Romanian destroyer "Regina Maria"

    A tragedy that could have been avoided. You can’t call sloppiness ....- CRIME! How many such annoying, ridiculous disasters were during the whole war. History is silent.
  4. connect30
    +10
    29 March 2012 10: 43
    Romanians probably were puzzled. Soviet ships came, shot at each other, and those who remained intact went back.
  5. +1
    29 March 2012 12: 11
    Yes. A sad and insulting story. I first heard her. Black page in the history of our fleet. A cruel and bitter lesson. But without such lessons, apparently it is also impossible to do. I think the sailors need to be told about him. that would be remembered and thought.
  6. 0
    29 March 2012 14: 23
    Wood chopping - chips fly.
    Thunder Constance - lost 3 ship. There were also planes there. How many have not returned?
    Why are so many lost, burned, spent?
    To gain experience.
    Indirect confirmation - poor combat training before the war. Read after that V. Suvorov and the like. And believe them. Tread, tread ... Tread ... on Constanta.
    While they didn’t wash themselves with blood, they didn’t learn to fight.
    Eh, Atlon spoke correctly - a professional army must fight. Should. Receive the plumes, roll yourself.
    But must.
    Nowhere without constant practice.
    1. blood
      +1
      5 July 2012 17: 56
      And what three ships did we lose ???
      Of those who participated in the operation, only Moscow died. "Shch-206" died later: according to one version, it was sunk by the Romanians in the area of ​​the Portitsky arm of the Danube, according to the other, it died when returning from the campaign.
  7. Kostyan
    -10
    29 March 2012 23: 41
    ours, as always, in his role .... a bunch of senators gave the order and the suckers executed it as downs ...... and who is constantly talking about the experience ???? that's how they recruited .. like full downs .. and so the whole war ..... country of downs and senility .... fucking scoop ... they will always bring us down ... until we get to the mind ... and we’ll never get to the mind .. after all, until this happened .......
    1. freedom
      +5
      30 March 2012 00: 14
      And you don’t stick yourself to us. It looks like yours in Khatyn put things in order. Outcast is sir.
    2. +3
      30 March 2012 06: 54
      Yes, Kostyan, seriously ..
      Of the twelve phrases, only one can be read and understood normally.
      And all the rest will only understand ".. like full downs .."

      My post is about something else.
      It was the fourth day of the war.
      1. Kostyan
        -4
        30 March 2012 12: 55
        What's the difference???? after the "bagration" all the operations are just an assault on the lair of the beast .... they did not bother themselves with inventing maneuvers .... the apotheosis .... the death of 2 tank armies near Berlin ..... that the first day of the war .. that the last ... one hell ...
  8. shinsen
    +1
    30 March 2012 09: 57
    The story is completely unclear. Here is the exact opposite. For Sch-206 there is such a thing. "On the morning of June 28, the boat made the last contact, announcing its return to the position from which the boat left for the duration of the surface ships' operation at Constanta." sad Morozov, M. E., Kulagin, K. L. "Pike". Legends of the Soviet submarine fleet. - M .: Yauza, Eksmo, 2008 .-- S. 120 .-- 176 p. - (Arsenal collection). And according to the results of the raid. "With artillery fire the leaders" Moscow "and" Kharkov "completely destroyed the oil reserves of the port, destroyed several echelons with weapons and ammunition intended for the Romanian troops to invade Ukraine." Http://www.newsru.com/world/17may2011/moskva. html
    1. Brother Sarych
      +1
      30 March 2012 12: 29
      I'm afraid that all this is not entirely true - I really wanted to make excuses for the senseless death of ships and people ...
      It was written rather vaguely about this in the book "Soviet naval art in the Great Patriotic War" from 1973 ...
  9. +6
    30 March 2012 22: 47
    Quote: shinsen
    The story is not clear to the end.

    That's it... Submarine Shch-206 was cut into a position near the port of Mangalia, about 30 miles from Constanta itself. She could not see the ships of the raid at such a distance, and even if she "rushed" to their location at 5 o'clock (the beginning of the artillery barrage), she would need more than 2 hours to cover this distance even by surface passage, while the "Moscow" exploded at 5.21, and "Kharkov" observed the first torpedo track at 6.43. In addition, the boat got in touch after 2 days - on June 28, indicating in the message that she did not see the enemy ships. According to the enemy, "Shch-206" was sunk by Romanian ships on July 9, 1941, 8 miles east of Mangalia. At the bottom 8,5 miles northeast of Mangalia at the point with coordinates 43 ° 53.006 'N / 28 ° 46.757' E, an object was discovered that may be the sunken "Shch-206".
    The most likely reason for the death of the leader "Moscow" is his detonation at the minefield S-10. The leader had lost his left paravan-guard by this time, however, as before - the leader of "Kharkov". The explosion occurred at the moment of a sharp turn of the ship at a speed of over 26 knots. At such a speed, with a sharp shift of the rudder (it must have been put on board), the leader's body experienced an enormous load, and of a rather complex nature. The explosion of a mine (even one with a BZO 200 kg) somewhere in the area of ​​the bow bulkhead of the boiler room could become the initiating beginning of the destruction of the ship's hull, and then the powerful pressure of water, combined with inertial forces and moments with broken rigid connections of the hull set, completed the transformation in a matter of seconds ship in two stumps.
    "Kharkov" at 6.43 noticed the trail of a torpedo, but managed to evade it. At about 7 o'clock the EM "Soobrazitelny" successively evaded one, then the second torpedo, and, reaching the point of the intended salvo, dropped 4 large and 6 small depth charges. After that, a large oil slick was observed and the stern of the submarine appeared for a moment and quickly plunged into the water. Over time, in the literature, these two torpedo attacks were transformed into one, which occurred at 06:53, and as a result of which there were signs of sinking of the submarine. Whose torpedoes they were, whose stern part was seen from the ships - to this day remains a mystery.
  10. +5
    April 2 2012 00: 36
    Auto RU... Before giving out "stunning" military-historical information to people, it must be checked for reliability three times, especially when considering such a sensitive topic for our people as the Great Patriotic War. You must not abuse the "blank spots" in the military history of Russia by putting forward your own (or someone else's) unconfirmed hypotheses under the guise of supposedly reliable information.
  11. Pessimist
    0
    April 5 2012 03: 10
    Very hard and straightforward data from the author. But where from? All sources are very contradictory to each other! Conclusions are problematic, but you can think of anything!
  12. blood
    +1
    5 July 2012 17: 52
    The usual distortion of events, pulled from similar opuses. I advise you to read the book B. Banshats, A. Lubyanov "The leader of the destroyers" Moscow ". The history of the ship", Sevastopol, 2006 Small circulation - 500 copies, but in the Internet. There are many publications on this topic. recently.
  13. 0
    1 September 2019 14: 21
    To put it mildly - a very strange description of events! After 4 minutes of shelling, the coastal battery of the Romanians opened fire back, targeting the leader "Moskva", as a result, when the shells began to fall in the immediate vicinity, it was decided to retreat, setting up a smoke screen. The shelling of Constanta lasted 12 minutes, the leader of "Kharkov" fired 154 high-explosive shells. A few minutes later, after the "Moscow" turned "Kharkov" (so as not to lose the wake jet). It was at this moment that the leader of "Moskva" was blown up by a mine (the survivors did not report about the hits of shells or torpedoes). Despite the fact that the ship broke into two parts and sank, from the anti-aircraft gun on the stern bridge they fired at the enemy aircraft that appeared. "Kharkov" tried to rescue sailors floating nearby, however, the Romanian battery had already been shot. Shells fell nearby again, and the planes successfully threw 2 bombs (one at the bow and the other at the stern). The stroke dropped to 14 knots. After that, it was decided to retreat further. However, the attack by the aircraft continued until one of them was shot down. The second enemy plane flew away, but not for long. Soon he returns, "Kharkov" manages to dodge the first bombs, however, the speed drops to 5 knots. It was at this moment that the leader was attacked by an enemy submarine. "Kharkov" dodged a torpedo, the boat was fired upon by diving shells. At this moment, the "Smart" came to the rescue, which sank the submarine. Together, the ships repelled another dive bomber attack, and soon they managed to repair one of the boilers and gain a speed of 29 knots. For the first and last time, Shch-206 contacted the base on June 28, which "had no contact with the enemy." How could the submarine get in touch on June 28, if it was sunk on June 26?
    According to our intelligence, a large fire broke out at an oil storage in Constanta, a train with ammunition was set on fire, a railway station was destroyed, communication between Constanta and Bucharest was interrupted, and there were difficulties in supplying fuel to the front. Fleet historian Colonel M. E. Morozov, based on the study of photographs of the destruction of an important Romanian port, noted: "The results of the shelling made a strong impression."
    69 sailors led by the commander of the "Moscow" managed to escape from the Romanian captivity.
    The operation was extremely poorly prepared, the victims could have been avoided, but everything was far from what was described in the article here.