Great commanders. Alexander the Great

27
Alexander of Macedon (356-323 BC) received an excellent education for his era - from 13 years Aristotle himself was engaged in his education. Alexander was fond of reading the heroic poems of Homer, he was inspired by the exploits of the great heroes of ancient Hellas. His father Philip II independently supervised son’s military training. Even in his youth, Alexander demonstrated his amazing abilities in military art. And in 338, Alexander’s personal participation in the Battle of Heronei greatly influenced the outcome of the battle, in which the Macedonians won.

The early years of the heir to the Macedonian throne were overshadowed by the divorce of parents. And after the second marriage of his father to another woman, Alexander fell out with Philip. In 336 BC er shortly after the mysterious death of Tsar Philip Alexander, who at that time turned 20 years old, ascended the throne, and the Greeks called him the hegemon of the Hellenic League.

Alexander the Great on a fragment of an ancient Roman mosaic from Pompeii, a copy of an ancient Greek painting


The young king considered the confrontation with Persia as the main competitor for influence in Asia Minor to be one of the main directions of the foreign policy of his state; therefore, great attention was paid to preparations for a military campaign against this country. Despite the fact that he inherited from his father the strongest army of ancient Greece, Alexander understood well that it was impossible to defeat the great power of the Achaemenids without the combined efforts of the whole of Hellas. Therefore, Alexander took care of the creation of a pan-Greek alliance and the formation of a combined Greek-Macedonian army. The elite part of the army consisted of the bodyguards of the king and the Macedonian royal guards, and the basis of the cavalry were horsemen from Thessaly. Marines were protected by heavy bronze armor, and their main weapons there was a sarissa - the famous Macedonian spear. Alexander significantly changed the tactics of the so-called Macedonian phalanx, developed by his father, using the angular construction, which allowed him to concentrate forces during the attack on the enemy’s right flank, which is traditionally weaker in the armies of that period. In addition to heavy infantry in the army of Alexander the Great, there were numerous lightly armed auxiliary units from various Greek cities. In general, the number of infantry reached 30 thousand people, the cavalry consisted of 5 thousand people. Despite the relatively small number of troops, the Greek-Macedonian army consisted of well-trained and armed fighters.

Before the start of the long-awaited campaign to the East, in the spring of 335, the young king made a throw to Thrace, suppressing the outbreak of the uprising. In Greece, the long absence of the ruler caused the spread of rumors about his death, and rebels from Boeotia surrounded the Macedonian garrison in Thebes. Upon learning of this, in the fall of 335, the young king struck the Thebans with a sudden blow, seizing and destroying their city. These measures had a frightening effect on the Greeks; as a result, they implicitly recognized his authority, adding to the army of Alexander recruits for the campaign against Persia.

In the 334 year, after Alexander's troops crossed the Hellespont, a war began, the purpose of which was to vengeance on the Persians for their reproach over the Greek shrines of Asia Minor.

Initially, Alexander had to fight with the Persian satraps who ruled Asia Minor. In 333, in the battle of the river Granic, the Macedonian army defeated the 60-thousandth Persian army, then Alexander went south, moving along the coast of Ionia. After a long siege, the Macedonians conquered the Persian garrisons in the cities of Miletus and Halicarnassus, other cities voluntarily surrendered to the victor’s mercy. In the spring of 333, Alexander's army occupied Lykia and Pamphylia, in July the Macedonians conquered Paphlagonia and Cappadocia, and in September Cilicia. But the Achaemenid Power possessed colossal human and material potential. And Darius III, having connected the best military units from different parts of his state, set off to meet the Macedonian king. But, despite careful preparation, in the decisive battle of Issus his 100-thousandth army suffered a crushing defeat, Darius himself barely managed to escape, fleeing from the battlefield, and his mother, wife and children were captured. At the beginning of winter 332, the Macedonian army entered Phenicia, besieging Tire. A long siege and bitter assault did their job, and eventually they took the city. A similar fate awaited the people of Gaza.



Alexander decided not to stop at the achieved victory, continuing the campaign. After a successful siege of Tire, the path to Egypt was opened in front of him, and already in the winter of 332-331. Greco-Macedonian army arrived in the Nile Valley. The inhabitants of the states enslaved by the Persians treated the Macedonians as liberators. In order to preserve a stable power in the captured territory, Alexander announced that his father was the Egyptian god Ammon, whom the Greeks identified with Zeus, thanks to which Alexander, in the eyes of the Egyptians, acquired the right to power and the title of Pharaoh by the law. Another method of strengthening power in the conquered countries was the settlement of these territories by the Greeks and Macedonians, thus the Greek language and culture were spread over vast territories. Migrants usually settled in specially built new cities, most often called the name of Alexander. The most famous is based in Egypt, the city of Alexandria. The successful actions of Alexander’s army in Egypt deprived the Persian fleet of the only remaining support base.

To fight the Persians and Spartans who landed on Crete, Alexander sent a squadron led by Amphoter. Antipater, Alexander's vicar in Macedonia, was at that time busy suppressing the uprising of the Spartans in the Peloponnese. After the victory over the Spartans, Antipater sent significant reinforcements to Egypt, which joined the main body of the Macedonian expedition. In the spring of 331, Alexander left Egypt, going to Syria. In September, having crossed the Euphrates, his army crossed Mesopotamia and, sticking to the left bank of the Tigris, reached the village of Gavgamely. At this place they were to meet with the huge army of Darius III, who was waiting for them, which, according to ancient historians, reached a million people.



The decisive battle took place on 1 on October 331, near Gaugamela. After a crushing defeat, Darius III, once again fleeing, went to Ecbatana. In the meantime, Alexander did not encounter any resistance in his way and managed to occupy Babylon, Persepolis, Susa and Ecbatana without a fight. Briefly staying at Ecbatans, Alexander allowed all the Greek allies who wished this to go home. His plans included the creation of a new ruling class of Persians and Macedonians, he also paid attention to the local nobility, causing discontent of his comrades.
Having a little rested, Alexander's army again set out on the march. Passing Suzianu, the Macedonian warriors captured Persia, burned the palace of Darius in Persepolis, and in July the Macedonians entered the Media. Frightened by the approach of the Macedonian army, Darius III, accompanied by a small detachment of horsemen, went to Bactria. By the order of the satrap of Bactria Bess, Darius III was killed, after which Bess, who proclaimed himself Persian king, was forced to go on the run, avoiding persecution. By decree of Alexander, the last Persian king was buried in Persepolis with the appropriate pomp to the king. Thus, the Achaemenid power ceased to exist, and Alexander was proclaimed "the king of Asia." After that, the Macedonians occupied Parthia and Hyrcania. After the victory over the satrap Areia Satibarzan, the territories of Drangiana, Gedrosia and Arachosia were attached to the empire of Alexander.

In the 329 year, after crossing the Eastern Iranian areas, Alexander's army arrived in Central Asia, whose inhabitants, under the command of Spitamen, fiercely resisted; this rebellion was suppressed only after the death of Spitamen in 328. Bess was given his closest and he was executed. Sughd resistance was desperate. After the first successes that allowed Alexander to force the Yaksart river to meet with the nomadic tribes of the Saks, the Macedonian led back - there began new performances that lasted until 327.

Alexander tried to pursue a delicate cultural policy, trying to observe the traditions of the local people, put on the Persian royal robes, and also took Bactrika Roxana as his wife. But his desire to adopt the Persian court ceremonial (especially the fall before the king) was rejected by the proud freedom-loving Greeks, despite the fact that Alexander dealt harshly with the objectors. So, he ordered the killing of his own milk brother Klit, who dared to disobey once.

Alexander the Great's campaign in Asia


After leaving the territory of Bactria in April 327, Alexander set off on a campaign against India. In a continuous struggle with resisting local residents, overcoming the passes of the Hindu Kush, Alexander's army came to Indus, where they were awaited by the king of the principality of Taksila, who voluntarily submitted to Alexander. In May, Alexander 326, the army came out against King Pora. After winning the battle on the Hydasp River, the Macedonians moved further south. The Indus Valley was also annexed to Alexander's empire. In continuous battles, his army reached the Gifasis River, but here the exhaustion of the forces of soldiers and the need to periodically suppress riots in the army forced Alexander to abandon the campaign, turning to the west.

In the first half of 325 of the year, moving along Hydasp and Indus, in one and the battles Alexander was seriously wounded, but this did not prevent the Macedonians to go to the ocean, where they built ships, on which parts of the troops led by Nearhom should reach the Persian Gulf. The commander Crater set off through Drangiana and Arachosia to suppress the rebellions that broke out again, and Alexander, with the rest of the army, went through the desert of Gedrosia. The union of Alexander the Great's army happened only in January 324, and in February the Macedonians reached the city of Susa. On the way to Babylon, Alexander conquered the tribes who did not submit to him.

In 323, Alexander entered the Babylon with triumph. In this city he received ambassadors from different nations, here he was considering plans for new conquests. After returning to Babylon, Alexander did not forget about the policy of uniting the multi-lingual peoples of his state, rapprochement with the Persian aristocrats involved in government. At the request of Alexander, mass weddings of Macedonians and Persians were arranged, he himself took as his wives two Persians at the same time - Statir and Parisatide, who were the daughters of Darius.

Alexander of Macedon in the helmet of Hercules (lion's head) on the sarcophagus of Sidon


Alexander planned to conquer Arabia and North Africa, but the realization of these plans was prevented by his unexpected death from the bite of the anopheles mosquito. However, among historians there is no consensus about the causes of the death of Alexander the Great. The version of his poisoning is quite common, although she did not find either a confirmation or a refutation.

After Alexander's death, power over a huge state passed to his newborn son and stepbrother Arridea. But the actual power over the empire was in the hands of Alexander's commanders, the Diadochi, who soon began to fight each other, trying to divide the state among themselves.

The great commander of all times and peoples, Alexander the Great, conquered almost the whole world known to him, which, however, turned out to be too big even for him. The empire created by Alexander, the first superpower in the world, proved to be fragile, since the political and economic side of Alexander's gains was weak — for his short life, Alexander still failed to embrace the immense. What can not be said about the enormous influence that Greek culture had on the countries of the East. Hellenism was the first example of global cultural expansion, the results of which determined the entire future course of the world stories. The personality of Alexander of Macedon continues to be the subject of numerous disputes and conjectures, as well as serious scientific research. Only one truth is obvious: Alexander of Macedon is glorified through the ages as a symbol of courage, bravery and a commander's genius.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. raptor_fallout
    +6
    27 March 2012 10: 13
    A lesson to some of the currently militant countries and empires, you cannot live on seizures alone.
    1. +5
      27 March 2012 18: 13
      If I am not mistaken, then even Aristotle (the same one that taught Alexander Filippovich in childhood) remarked: "States created according to the military principle are alive while they are waging wars. During the period of peace, they cease to exist" ...
      Apparently, young Sasha skipped this lesson ...
  2. Makhalych
    +16
    27 March 2012 10: 26
    A small correction. Alexander NEVER minted his portrait on coins. These are inventions of dealers for the best sales thereof. :-)) This is a picture of Hercules and not Alexander. After his death, his portrait was minted by Lysimachus on his tetras (second row, in the middle in the photo) and Ptolemy being still a satrap of Egypt (second row, right in the photo). And then, it was not an exact portrait only his image. True, there is a version that a certain part of the coinage of Lysimachus with a portrait of A.M. it was cut by masters from the cast of the death mask, but what kind of coins (and Lysimachus minted them in HUGE runs) is not known for certain.
    So here is a mistake, intravital portrait coins with A.M. - NO, with some types of posthumous - a question.
    By the way, according to the first four coins presented (the entire first row and the left from the second), the big question is where are the lifetime ones and where are the death ones ?? !! Since for this you need to at least, in addition to the obverse, also see the reverse, in order to try to understand. Because of the similar type of coins were minted throughout Oikumen for another years and 150 after the death of Alexander.
    Okay, this is where I finish the brief excursion into the Ancient Numismatics. :-)
    1. +2
      27 March 2012 20: 04
      Thanks, very interesting. Plus
  3. +4
    27 March 2012 10: 39
    Makhalych plus cognitively ... this is his tourism ... in those days there was no other way to see the world ...
    1. raptor_fallout
      +1
      27 March 2012 10: 43
      Quote: ward
      Makhalych plus cognitively ... this is his tourism ... in those days there was no other way to see the world ...

      laughing +
  4. Makhalych
    +3
    27 March 2012 10: 52
    Quote: ward
    it’s his tourism ... in those days there was no other way to see the world ...


    Hmm ... Yes, the tour operator "Alexander & Co". laughing
    In fact, of course, the idea of ​​a single people, a single kingdom, cosmopolitanism and so on is possible, maybe not bad, but ... But Alexander turned out to be just a man, with all human weaknesses. It turned out to be incomprehensible by his comrades-in-arms, convicted of accepting the whole of the East (clothing, proskinesis, etc.) and replacing it with his own, indigenous Greco-Macedonian, and as a result ... As a result, the BIG business did not reach its final. The East dissolved in him his and his intentions, but what he won was torn to pieces and as a result, his closest associates, friends, relatives .... But the man was certainly GREAT.
    1. +2
      27 March 2012 11: 54
      Makhalych,. The East dissolved in him and his intentions, and what he won was torn to pieces and, as a result, the closest comrades-in-arms, friends, and relatives fell apart .--- Why did the states based on the ruins of his empire existed happily ever after !!! wink until the more angry tourists came, ROMANS, so they buried all his achievements !!!
  5. +1
    27 March 2012 11: 45
    PATRIOTS enough for this freak (you are emptiness is out of date) praises to sing ... "Avesta" was destroyed by Alexander the Great at the instigation of the Egyptian priests "Avesta" this text was written by the Mokosh runes on 12 cowhides 000 7 years ago with the history of the war of the Slovenian peoples with the Chinese (Arimians) and the conclusion of peace between the warring parties was called the Creation of the World in the Star Temple.
    PS (SLOVENS - Ivan the Terrible for the first time ordered the pioneer printer Ivan Fedorov to print "Slavs" instead of "words" or "Slovenes", for which the fugitive prince Andrei Kurbsky then reproached the formidable tsar from his refuge in Ostrog: Ioans, in my opinion, will forgive you by this word of your accursed sins and bear this word perfectly, like a banner. ”)
    1. Sniper 1968
      0
      27 March 2012 15: 47
      Petrol,
      + from a like-minded person. He went to India after the Indian Vedas in order to destroy them as well. Praise to Dazhdbog, he did not reach ...
    2. predator
      0
      27 March 2012 18: 29
      and what is the Star Temple? where is ?
      1. Sniper 1968
        -1
        28 March 2012 01: 37
        predator,
        Quote: predator
        what star temple

        The ancient name of the year according to the Flight of Chislobog (the ancient calendar of the Slavs). On March 22, the day of the vernal equinox, 7520 years ago the World was Created in the year Z.X. From our side is Prince ASUR, from Arimia is Ruler Ariman. Petka Romanov, introducing new chronology, took 5508 years of our history from us ... Ancient sections of the Wall (not those where tourists are transported, those remade) were built by loopholes in the South. So who defended from whom? China-we call only the rest, the tea-house, rank. There is Moscow-China-city. What did the Chinese live in ancient Moscow? No. It was just that the Kremlin was originally fenced, in case of an attack, it could not accommodate everyone. And therefore, at the request of the townspeople, additional territory was fenced: CHINA-city, fenced city, and China is a fenced country. Good luck.
        1. Sniper 1968
          0
          28 March 2012 09: 08
          CHINA - a few sharpened stakes tied and dug into the ground.
    3. Pessimist
      +1
      April 5 2012 03: 27
      Actually, dear, "Avesta" was destroyed by the roots of Muslims in the 7-8 centuries! The remnants of the priests of this cult fled to India from Iran, their remnants are the so-called "Parsis". And I would like to believe in your information, but ... So it is possible to agree to the point that the Egyptian Sphinx is the first Cossack chieftain! Moreover, the Macedonian was quite tolerant of someone else's faith, a single case of burning scrolls could not destroy the entire "Avesta" (in Marakanda)
  6. Makhalych
    +5
    27 March 2012 13: 38
    Quote: Benzin
    "Avesta" was destroyed by Alexander the Great at the instigation of Egyptian priests. "Avesta" is a text written by runes of mokos on 12 cowhides 000 7 years ago with the history of the war of the Slavic peoples with the Chinese (Arymians) and the conclusion of peace between the warring parties was called the Creation of the World in Star The temple.


    Oh, what a bad man, radish. laughing
    Right on 12 skins were recorded, right? ah-ah-ah ... laughing
    And that he, burned all the skins, or chopped down with a sword-hoarder. Oh yes, not with a sword, sorry, he had the same Mahaira of Macedonia. laughing
    But still, what an insolence, did he destroy the text about the war between the Slavs and the Arymians, or maybe ... the Limurians or ... generally with Darth Vader? laughing

    In general, if without fun, then this ... this is a complete star. And sad ...
  7. +2
    27 March 2012 13: 53
    And if we hypothetically assume that Alexander would not move to the East, but to the West - would the world see the rise of Rome and Carthage?
    And yet - why did Alexander so easily pass through almost all of Asia to India, and the Romans, having an army more numerous and professional, could not even go to the Persian Gulf for a short time?
    1. +2
      27 March 2012 18: 08
      Rome was more occupied with Europe (Gaul, Iberia) and North Africa (Carthage) and began its expansion to the East in the last turn ...
      Alexander, on the contrary, threw all his forces at Persia ...
  8. Makhalych
    +2
    27 March 2012 14: 23
    Quote: Prometey
    And if we hypothetically assume that Alexander would not move to the East, but to the West - would the world see the rise of Rome and Carthage?


    I think yes. Alexander was not eternal.
    Rome was all one, and Carthage too. Plans for a march to the West were also, but A.M. just did not have time ...


    Quote: Prometey
    And yet - why did Alexander so easily pass through almost all of Asia to India, and the Romans, having an army more numerous and professional, could not even go to the Persian Gulf for a short time?


    The Romans and Alexander had different ways, behavior and goals. Therefore, what happened is what happened.
  9. wk
    -5
    27 March 2012 15: 53
    Alexander the Great - the leader of the army of "militant homosexuals" - I don't think that's what one should take an example from! .... and all the churches will subject him to anaphim .... probably his appearance inspires his faded followers - organizers of gay parades!
    1. wk
      0
      April 2 2012 02: 06
      .... yes, I wonder who minus me ... fagots who want to legalize such a relationship in the Russian army, like the United States .... she is also a great army of "fighting homosexuals" and gay relations are commonplace there.
      1. Pessimist
        +3
        April 5 2012 03: 39
        yes, you watch more Hollywood historical films !!! and learn history from them !!! very true everything !!!! For information: about fagots all fiction. The Macedonian had only one favorite, Rokshanek. At Chaeronea, where A.M. commanded the cavalry, it was his detachment that destroyed the "Theban Sacred Squad", consisting just of fagots! And Thebes were then wiped out after their revolt. Arrian has evidence that A.M. hated violence against women. Rare case! ALTHOUGH PROBABLY AMERS KNOW EVERYTHING BETTER ARRIANA !!!!
  10. -2
    27 March 2012 16: 36
    This topic, as well as almost all historical topics, is full of questions, ambiguities and late rewritings by the powers that be of this past tense.
    It is noteworthy: the Macedonians are Slavs, but world history credits the campaigns of Alexander the Great with ancient Greek history. Here the author took advantage of sources that claim that A.M. "Received an excellent education for his era - from 13 years, Aristotle himself was engaged in his education."
    I previously read the works of scientists, which stated that Aristotle was assigned to AM only immediately before his campaign in Persia to describe this campaign and, in addition, to teach AM Greek. But Alexander, until the end of his days never learned it.
    Another interesting point.
    AM’s plan to conquer Asia envisaged the division of the army into 2 units, which were supposed to go along the southern and northern shores of the Black Sea and, after the successful completion of the campaign, unite along the Tanais (Don) - Yaksart (Syr-Darya) river. The then geographical science believed that modern Don and Syr Darya are one river. (Apparently because the same people lived on their shores, which the Greeks called Scythians - Saki, which is mentioned in the article - one of the Scythian tribes).
    As you know, Alexander himself reached Syr-Darya by taking Maracanda (Samarkand). He led an army of 34,5 thousand people. The second part of such a Macedonian army numbering 30 thousand people, led by the best general Alexander, Zopirion, entered the northern Black Sea region and perished there, to the last man, without a trace.
    To defeat such an army, the inhabitants of the then southern Russia had to have their own, no less in number, no worse organized and armed. But who exactly then lived there? World history calls them Scythians and already appeared cleaved.
    By the way, Alexander himself, after several skirmishes with the Scythians in Central Asia, did not dare to conquer them. Wikipedia writes: "Further to the north, the Macedonian troops did not go deep, the places there were deserted and, according to the ideas of the Greeks, uninhabited."
    A variant similar to that shown in the “White Desert Suns” is not ruled out, when it turned out that “the grenades of the Scythians are of the wrong system”.

    P.S. Now, offhand, I can’t remember where, but I read that the third photo from the top is an intravital sculptural image of AM. The difference with others is visible to the naked eye. Although the portrait has no nose, everything is clear early on - how much AM Greek or northern type.
    1. Pessimist
      +2
      April 5 2012 03: 48
      The ethnicity of the Macedonians is not known for certain! Their writing was Greek, their self-name is unknown, "Makedos" is a Greek name meaning "tall, tall". And even more so they are not Slavs !!! The Slavs settled in the Balkans in the 6-7 centuries, Antes! AND THE NAME OF MACEDONIA IS GEOGRAPHICAL! And the problem of self-identification of modern Macedonians-Slavs comes from here. A branch of one of the Serbian tribes, just like the Montenegrins!
  11. Makhalych
    +3
    27 March 2012 17: 09
    Quote: kosopuz
    It is noteworthy: the Macedonians are Slavs, but world history credits the campaigns of Alexander the Great with ancient Greek history. Here the author took advantage of sources that claim that A.M. "Received an excellent education for his era - from 13 years, Aristotle himself was engaged in his education."
    I previously read the works of scientists, which stated that Aristotle was assigned to AM only immediately before his campaign in Persia to describe this campaign and, in addition, to teach AM Greek. But Alexander, until the end of his days never learned it.


    The Macedonians for the Greeks were barbarians from the north, just as for the same Macedonians their neighbors - molosets were considered barbarians. However, this did not prevent them from cooperating, to marry princesses (like Philip) and the like.
    It is interesting which scholars say that Aristotle was "assigned to AM" just before the hike?
    I have never met anyone like this.


    Quote: kosopuz
    The second part of such a Macedonian army of 30 thousand, led by the best general Alexander, Zopirion, entered the northern Black Sea region and perished there, to the last man, without a trace.


    Zopirion was not the best commander. Viceroy of Pontus himself volunteered for this campaign. Of course, he received approval from the boss. He went not so much against the Scythians as against the Greek colonies in the northern Black Sea coast. He besieged Olbia, but the Scythian kings who came to the aid of the Greeks gouged him. Part of the army was saved and all died one thing, but a little later.

    Quote: kosopuz
    To defeat such an army, the inhabitants of the then southern Russia had to have their own, no less in number, no worse organized and armed. But who exactly then lived there? World history calls them Scythians and already appeared cleaved.


    There were many who lived there. Scythians periodically migrated, and then they came from Wed. Asian region at one time.

    Quote: kosopuz
    By the way, Alexander himself, after several skirmishes with the Scythians in Central Asia, did not dare to conquer them.


    But they did not fight. They beat us in weakness and scattered. In the open, once made, got on the neck and resolved on the steppe. laughing
    If he hadn't gone further and further, he would have found a way to pacify them. As the saying goes: "A donkey laden with gold will take any fortress."
  12. +1
    27 March 2012 23: 11
    It started .... the tetrarchs, Lysimachus ...
    Where did all this come from? ... You know for sure?
    Through the fifth hands ... from the third words ..... transmit ... reliable data.

    The conquest silhouette is one to one conquest of the Seljuk Turks.
    And the outline itself - conjures up strange associations ... near the Black Sea ..

    Coins ... and the non-coin period ... little to remember? how did they suddenly lose what they had been building up for centuries?
    Was there no nuclear war in those years? What has been brought up with amnesia so much?

    As an interesting parallel, it does.
    And no more.
  13. Makhalych
    +1
    28 March 2012 08: 20
    Quote: Igarr
    It started .... the tetrarchs, Lysimachus ...
    Where did all this come from? ... You know for sure?
    Through the fifth hands ... from the third words ..... transmit ... reliable data.


    We know from a historical source. And there are a lot of them.


    Quote: Igarr
    The conquest silhouette is one to one conquest of the Seljuk Turks.
    And the outline itself - conjures up strange associations ... near the Black Sea ..


    What does the "outline" bring you strange? That is only if that some of the conquests were moving along the same paths, so what?


    Quote: Igarr
    Coins ... and the non-coin period ... little to remember? how did they suddenly lose what they had been building up for centuries?
    Was there no nuclear war in those years? What has been brought up with amnesia so much?


    What "coinless period", more specifically, please? Where? In the world as a whole or only here, in Russia?
    In the World it was not in principle. In Russia, it was short-lived and explicable.

    Quote: Igarr
    As an interesting parallel, it does.
    And no more.


    And you can also draw a parallel between the Second World War and the Napoleonic invasion of 1812.
    Good parallels can be deduced.
    And there and there the enemy attacked on one side. He reached Moscow (although Napoleon entered) and was defeated near Moscow and began to retreat along almost the same path as the Germans. Both guerrillas acted there and there. And so on and so forth ... You can dial a lot of parallels. And what if you say that the war of 1812 was a specular reflection of the Second World War? laughing
    No, you will not say. You won’t be able to yet. But after 150 years, with such thoughts and such an approach to history - they will say.
    Read less nonsense like the scribble of Fomenko and similar pseudo-scientists read.
    1. Pessimist
      0
      April 5 2012 03: 53
      Plus to you !!! SO SOON AND THE BOB WILL TURN INTO WAR OF AMERICA AND ISRAEL AGAINST RUSSIAN AND GERMAN !!!
  14. lilit.193
    +1
    April 10 2013 18: 08
    Good commander. As an excellent tactician. But the strategist was very mediocre. And the politician from him is also in the C grade. True, on the C grade with a plus.
  15. +15
    4 November 2017 18: 52
    One of the galaxy of the greatest commanders of the world