The Russian Embassy responded to Haley about "intervening" in US affairs

21
Russia has never interfered in the internal affairs of the United States and is still ready to normalize bilateral relations. RIA News Statement by the Russian Embassy in Washington.





Earlier, the United States Permanent Representative to the UN, Nikki, said that intervening in the elections of other countries is weaponwhich Russia prefers, since it does not have a strong economy and “the country's armed forces are not large enough.” Such an intervention she called the "way of waging war."

We would like to remind colleague Nikki Haley that those who interfered in the US electoral processes, and in the most open and unceremonious manner, should be sought among officially announced allies and friends,
answered at the Russian embassy.

Diplomats recalled that all these years Russia “has consistently advocated a return to normal relations with the United States.”

We are ready to build them on an equal and mutually respectful basis. Open to the most frank dialogue with the United States on any issues of the bilateral and international agenda to find common approaches to solving common problems for all.
the statement said.

The embassy noted that in 2015, diplomats from the Russian Federation offered Washington to hold bilateral consultations on cyber threats, but they did not see reciprocal readiness for this from the American side.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    20 October 2017 09: 31
    No need to make excuses .. We must act. And do not be shy about their "complexes"
    1. +1
      20 October 2017 09: 39
      Quote: 210ox
      We must act.



      And how to act? Tell me. smile
      1. 0
        20 October 2017 09: 42
        He took out a gun - a shot!
      2. +18
        20 October 2017 09: 44
        Quote: Iskander Sh
        And how to act? Tell me.

        It is not necessary to mine the road, it can be said that the road is mined and the excuse for the monkeys has long bothered.
        1. 0
          20 October 2017 09: 55
          That is, you need to sit in silence or bang a shoe on the podium? smile
          1. +8
            20 October 2017 10: 14
            Quote: Iskander Sh
            That is, you need to sit in silence or bang a shoe on the podium? smile

            Lavrov is not Gromyko, this Gromyko could keep silent with a frown and half of the world under the bench immediately fluttered, and how to answer the boors who dump tons of dirt on us every day, any VO forum member can answer. feel hi
            1. +1
              20 October 2017 10: 39
              Quote: 79807420129
              half of the world beneath the bench immediately zakherivalsya


              Remind how it ended for the USSR?

              Quote: 79807420129
              and how to respond to the boors who dump tons of dirt on us daily



              Russia has already demanded evidence of interference. After conducting an investigation, the United States provided zero without a stick. This was not left without attention in the world. Germany said it could no longer rely on the United States, France said it needed to find ways out of the situation. Arab sheikhs do not get out of the Kremlin and so on and so forth. But you can continue to be led by gorlopans who only do what they shout: MUCH! HOW MUCH CAN YOU BE patient !!

              By the way, it was these slogans that were very popular in the late 80s and early 90s. Have you already forgotten?
        2. +8
          20 October 2017 11: 24
          Quote: 79807420129
          and justification for the monkeys has long bothered.

          it's time for us to make complaints
      3. +2
        20 October 2017 09: 47
        Katz offers to give up? Yes, you just don’t have to make excuses, they don’t say we .. They don’t understand the expression of weakness in our gaddy world, but it justifies it.
        Quote: Iskander Sh
        Quote: 210ox
        We must act.



        And how to act? Tell me. smile
        1. +2
          20 October 2017 09: 53
          Quote: 210ox
          Katz offers to surrender?


          No.

          Quote: 210ox
          Yes, you just don’t need to make excuses, they say, not we .. They don’t understand the expression of weakness in our gaddy world, but it justifies it.



          So what is needed? Just do not write "need to act" laughing I would still like to read some specifics. smile
          1. +4
            20 October 2017 10: 13
            And I suggest, DO NOT NEED TO BE VALIDATED? Read carefully. Article about what? About the fact that our diplomats make excuses to pigs by and large And don’t need to throw beads, they won’t.
            Quote: Iskander Sh
            Quote: 210ox
            Katz offers to surrender?


            No.

            Quote: 210ox
            Yes, you just don’t need to make excuses, they say, not we .. They don’t understand the expression of weakness in our gaddy world, but it justifies it.



            So what is needed? Just do not write "need to act" laughing I would still like to read some specifics. smile
            1. 0
              20 October 2017 10: 22
              Quote: 210ox
              DO NOT BE JUSTIFIED?



              That is, you must sit and be silent, so it turns out your way. Or maybe you offer to arrange a mahach, ala Ukraine style. laughing


              And where did you see the excuse? I see the usual diplomatic reply in the spirit: "Peace, friendship, chewing."
      4. +2
        20 October 2017 09: 48
        I would suggest lodging be called a lie, in response comments, rather than lace weaving. Diplomatic etiquette of course should be, but in moderation. And if Nikki lies freely or not freely, you have to answer like that: you're lying all .... dyed!
        1. +1
          20 October 2017 10: 56
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Diplomatic etiquette of course should be, but in moderation. And if Nikki lies freely or not freely, you have to answer like that: you're lying all .... dyed!

          I will support your opinion, I will only add from myself that a diplomat, demonstratively observing etiquette in the eyes of others, becomes a sort of D "Artagnan among ...
          But, if our big cones from the government and diplomacy begin at every opportunity in their speeches, speeches and interviews to insert phrases like: "... did you find this out at CNN?" , "... is this information from the State Department? Ah, then everything is clear ...", "... let's not go down to the level of Jane Psaki ...", "... You think so in vain about him. He far from McCain ... ", etc. then after some time the statements of Western figures, such as those discussed in this article, will cause a smile in the audience, and even after a while irritation and a bunch of negative emotions. And diplomatic etiquette will not be violated.
          No, in fairness, I must say that Putin and Lavrov slip sometimes, but too rarely and too softly.
          1. 0
            20 October 2017 11: 22
            I agree. In the framework of diplomatic ethics, you can also find ways to influence the subscriber. In this regard, I want to mention Zakharov. She is an intelligent person, of course, but I doubt that her words do not lose sarcasm after the translation.
    2. +3
      20 October 2017 10: 48
      Quote: 210ox
      And do not be shy about your "complexes"

      Especially such as the S-400 S-500, mobile TopolM, BZHRK .... smile
  2. +4
    20 October 2017 10: 16
    What a run in a circle ...
  3. +3
    20 October 2017 10: 19
    And that no one paid attention, including the media, to Hailey’s words that private individuals would pay for the actions of the Russian government, in my opinion this is a much more interesting topic than all these laces about interference or non-interference? February is getting closer ...
  4. +1
    20 October 2017 10: 25
    Our superiors need to learn just one short phrase for English-speaking geeks: It's not your dog business!
  5. 0
    20 October 2017 15: 49
    Sorry, I just don’t know, but is it absolutely necessary to answer any bubbly? (Does it just repent to me that it’s humiliating) Or are our diplomats just showing people like “We don’t translate the product for nothing”? Onizh did not ask us questions.
  6. 0
    20 October 2017 21: 21
    We play diplomacy again. The US Permanent Representative to the UN is openly rude and makes statements (even if not within the UN walls), which are usually followed by a declaration of war, or at least a break in diplomatic relations, and our embassy makes some unintelligible statements. In my humble opinion, we need to talk harder with them, gesture ...