Military Review

Su-30SM delivers a ship with an accurate hit: spectacular shots from the Black Sea

26
Fighters Su-30SM marine aviation Black Sea fleet practiced practical actions to destroy the ships of the conditional enemy.


26 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 20 October 2017 00: 33 New
    +6
    carries the ship

    I wildly apologize, but where does it "carry" can be seen? That the airplane didn’t miss - I saw that there were already two bombs or missiles. You can see a huge cloud from the explosions .... And the vessel as it stood and still probably stands.
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 20 October 2017 00: 41 New
      +3
      Quote: kunstkammer
      And the vessel as it stood and still stands probably.

      And, in my opinion, almost in half. Bow and stern at an angle, sort of.
    2. VIN34
      VIN34 20 October 2017 00: 46 New
      +8
      I will wildly apologize if after this on the vessel someone remains alive ... And without control, even an unmanned ship is a piece of metal, even floating. Gomno does not sink ...
    3. svp67
      svp67 20 October 2017 07: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: kunstkammer
      And the vessel as it stood and still stands probably.

      Such a target is "weight in gold", more than one "Putin's falcon" on it will work out its skill ... And no one paid attention to the dimensions of this "vessel", which seems to me to be a direct hint at how they will manage a kind of "wolf pack" ...
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 20 October 2017 08: 00 New
        0
        something it seems to me that this is a direct allusion to how they will manage a certain “wolf pack”

        It is unlikely to be so reduced. The target is small, nimble, will not stand. And why substitute for a gun? Everything will cost 4 homing missiles or adjustable bombs from high altitude.
      2. kunstkammer
        kunstkammer 20 October 2017 20: 11 New
        0
        You do not quite understand me ... the bowl cracked, and God be with her.
        The main thing is that for the sake of a red word, the current councilors will slander even their mother. Know, vile, that catchy headline is already half of happiness.
        And then what? Yes, even get enough sleep on them! Or in Russian: ... all God's dew.
        Sometimes more solid magazines also suffer from such kookies.
        Like, the headline says: "Putin's falcons destroyed a bunker with dozens of militants!" In fact, they show from above how no more than five or six militants entered, went out, or entered the “bunker” within an hour ... Then there was a huge explosion ... half of the arsenal, you see, the Khmeinim base pulnuli ... the smoke cleared from " bunkers ”, shaking themselves and quietly swearing, the same five militants crawl out. The sixth gunman, at best, went crazy and decided to wait for the next tram to return to his homeland in Tatarstan.
        Therefore, it is clear that all broadcasts of victorious strikes end before the dispersion of the explosion cloud.
        1. Valery Saitov
          Valery Saitov 24 October 2017 08: 04 New
          0
          And when the words are scattered, the bottom line is: -Deputy Minister Anatoly Antonov, speaking at a briefing to reporters, said that during the operation in the Syrian Arab Republic, "killed about 35 thousand terrorists, including more than 2700 immigrants from Russia and CIS countries "
    4. Redfox3k
      Redfox3k 20 October 2017 09: 43 New
      0
      well, there’s definitely no one left alive
    5. max702
      max702 20 October 2017 15: 19 New
      0
      Apparently bombarded with "iron" accuracy megazachet good , but the fact that the boat survived surprised ...
    6. The poor man
      The poor man 20 October 2017 16: 02 New
      0
      These are probably thermobaric bombs.
      1. yeskela4018
        yeskela4018 20 October 2017 17: 58 New
        0
        So it is - they flashed the board and fell to the left of the side.
  2. pupsik
    pupsik 20 October 2017 01: 18 New
    0
    Well, the mirnyak will go to drown, but if there are at least stingers on the vessel? What for so close to the goal to approach?
  3. skazochnik
    skazochnik 20 October 2017 01: 22 New
    +3
    It seemed that it was bombed with about 500 meters. In a word, another window dressing.
    1. Molot1979
      Molot1979 20 October 2017 05: 58 New
      +3
      Quote: skazochnik
      It seemed that it was bombed with about 500 meters. In a word, another window dressing.


      And then what is NOT window dressing? Bombed from three meters? Or from three thousand? And all that is not a window dressing?
  4. garx
    garx 20 October 2017 08: 05 New
    +1
    This video, as I understand it, shows how Ukraine will "destroy" our fleet with its unique Wolf Pack tactics
  5. gromoboj
    gromoboj 20 October 2017 15: 33 New
    0
    Quote: svp67
    it’s a direct hint at how they will manage a certain “wolf pack” ...

    Here it is not necessary to prompt. And then they will put anti-tank anti-aircraft missiles on their boats
  6. Pavlyuk Vladimir
    Pavlyuk Vladimir 20 October 2017 17: 16 New
    0
    Would fly even closer. What distance did he shoot from? Maybe from this distance he himself would be smashed to pieces.
  7. Vladimir SHajkin
    Vladimir SHajkin 20 October 2017 17: 48 New
    0
    Well done pilot, sniper
  8. Eflintuk
    Eflintuk 20 October 2017 18: 57 New
    0
    There was a speed of at least 10 knots at the trough - a sniper in life would not have hit
  9. misti1973
    misti1973 20 October 2017 22: 16 New
    +1
    It’s not difficult to hit anything in the absence of opposition. You need to understand that in real combat conditions, any destroyer will tear it to shreds before he even decides to shoot. What do we have in real life with the R-37? The maximum is 130 km., But actually 30-40. And all the performance characteristics of all missiles are exaggerated. The S-400 can not shoot down low-flying Tomogavki. And the Shell also if it is not part of the layered missile defense. Let down even one. Or the F-35 will catch on :) :) And then there’s only one talk about how cool we are and what Americans are suckers. They even honestly write their technical characteristics on their products. Perhaps that’s why we are ready to sell our technologies left and right, if only we bought it! Go to the US so demand-why quickly send.
  10. Den nn
    Den nn 22 October 2017 11: 45 New
    +1
    Quote: misti1973
    It’s not difficult to hit anything in the absence of opposition. You need to understand that in real combat conditions, any destroyer will tear it to shreds before he even decides to shoot. What do we have in real life with the R-37? The maximum is 130 km., But actually 30-40. And all the performance characteristics of all missiles are exaggerated. The S-400 can not shoot down low-flying Tomogavki. And the Shell also if it is not part of the layered missile defense. Let down even one. Or the F-35 will catch on :) :) And then there’s only one talk about how cool we are and what Americans are suckers. They even honestly write their technical characteristics on their products. Perhaps that’s why we are ready to sell our technologies left and right, if only we bought it! Go to the US so demand-why quickly send.

    what are you carrying, miserable? With what x .., you decided that the Americans are truer than us ???!
  11. multipulti
    multipulti 22 October 2017 16: 22 New
    0
    note to note !!!
  12. iouris
    iouris 23 October 2017 17: 45 New
    0
    Aircraft conditionally shot down.
    1. freejack
      freejack 24 October 2017 21: 34 New
      +1
      Exactly?) And I think ... turned on the electronic warfare and all the stingers flew home! yes

      PS Why is everyone so tense? The pilot simply worked out one of the elements - bombing on a small-sized sea basin. And he did it brilliantly! good And do not equate this to a real battle - what would happen - if ....
  13. asr55
    asr55 26 October 2017 21: 07 New
    0
    Quote: kunstkammer
    carries the ship

    I wildly apologize, but where does it "carry" can be seen? That the airplane didn’t miss - I saw that there were already two bombs or missiles. You can see a huge cloud from the explosions .... And the vessel as it stood and still probably stands.

    Look at the media at the pan-and-panheads, where a rocket from a ship ricochets off and hits an airplane.
  14. asr55
    asr55 26 October 2017 21: 34 New
    0
    Quote: misti1973
    It’s not difficult to hit anything in the absence of opposition. You need to understand that in real combat conditions, any destroyer will tear it to shreds before he even decides to shoot. What do we have in real life with the R-37? The maximum is 130 km., But actually 30-40. And all the performance characteristics of all missiles are exaggerated. The S-400 can not shoot down low-flying Tomogavki. And the Shell also if it is not part of the layered missile defense. Let down even one. Or the F-35 will catch on :) :) And then there’s only one talk about how cool we are and what Americans are suckers. They even honestly write their technical characteristics on their products. Perhaps that’s why we are ready to sell our technologies left and right, if only we bought it! Go to the US so demand-why quickly send.

    Most likely, it is useless for you to write the way you are repulsed very much, but it’s better to read how to build a layered missile defense and so on. And at the expense of air-based anti-ship missiles, you can choose at least the x-32 speed of 3.5–4.6 m with a maximum range of up to 1000 km, with a multi-mode engine. If such a rocket flew to the target, then the end. And your beloved Americans have not yet learned how to shoot down RCC MOSKIT.