Soviet occupation plan about. Hokkaido and Japan's post-war projects

39
Soviet occupation plan about. Hokkaido and Japan's post-war projectsOne of the little-known pages of the military stories - the planned landing of Soviet troops on the island of Hokkaido. What led to the cancellation of this already begun operation?

The US administration began to develop the issues of occupation of Japan after 10 months after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Department of Post-War Programs was set up in the State Department under the leadership of Secretary of State Hella. One of the central issues of a rather heated discussion among committee members was the attitude towards the imperial system of government in Japan.

Hot disputes went on for a long time. In May 1944, the committee decided that the imperial system should be preserved, the territory of Japan should not dismember, the Japanese government would independently manage the country. However, this was the opinion of the diplomats. The American military, who strengthened their influence during the war, had their own views on the future occupation policy in Japan.

Soon after Germany’s surrender, the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff began to tackle this problem. For the consideration of issues related to the occupation, the so-called "White team" was created. The generals and colonels assigned to this team were concerned not so much with the problems of the future of Japan as with current issues of troop use.

Planning the landing of southern Kyushu in November 1945 (Operation Olympic), and then in March of the following year on the east coast of the main Japanese island of Honshu (Operation Coronet), the developers of these operations proceeded from the likely prospect of losing up to one million American half a million British soldiers and officers.

However, according to the calculations made, after Japan’s capitulation, 23 divisions or 800 thousand people would be required for its occupation. Answering the question whether this is not a lot, members of the White Team cited the following arguments: “Japan’s peculiarity is that even after the central government’s surrender, local resistance in various parts of the country can be continued. There are reports that Japan has been announced mobilization of volunteers, and therefore must be prepared for a worse situation. " Without the participation of the USSR, the war would take a protracted nature and would have stretched 2 of the year! Japanese losses could be up to 10 millions of people.

Although at the beginning of 45, the Allied Command firmly retained the initiative in the Pacific theater of military operations, Japan did not think about ending the war. She launched preparations for repelling the offensive by the US-British troops on the Japanese islands, as well as for defense in Korea and northeastern China, deciding to turn the area into an "impregnable fortress."

The entry into the war of the Soviet Union was beneficial for the United States, England, China and other countries that fought against Japan.

From a military point of view, the allocation of 800 thousand troops for the occupation of Japan hardly created a big problem. The problem was different. After the capitulation of Germany and the end of the war in Europe, public opinion in the United States intensified expectations of the speedy return of American soldiers to their homeland. How will the Americans perceive the continuation of the war?

Taking care of public opinion, President Truman’s inner circle began to speak out in favor of occupying Japan together with allied states. Admiral Leahie believed that the number of American occupying units should be reduced as much as possible and that the United States should not take primary responsibility in governing Japan. It must be assumed that the note “On reducing the participation of the US military in the occupation of Japan and the early demobilization of military personnel” compiled by Lehi reflected Truman’s sentiments.

Having received this note, the headquarters accelerated the development of a plan for the dismemberment of Japan into the occupation zones. Its creators proceeded from the fact that the United States, China, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines and a number of other countries should participate in the war against Japan, except for the United States. In addition to Britain, which, as the closest ally of the United States, was considered a natural participant in the occupation of Japan, it was also planned to attract China. It was taken into account that Japan, justifying its aggression, led propaganda about the struggle of the yellow race against "white imperialism". The occupation by the Chinese army of part of Japan’s territory would have undermined this propaganda and weakened the “racial character” of the occupation.

The prospect of Soviet participation in the war against Japan created the preconditions for the wide use of Soviet forces for the subsequent occupation of part of the Japanese islands. However, American politicians worried that in this case the Soviet Union would receive greater rights in the management of Japan.

Meanwhile, military considerations forced the American command to insist on the obligatory involvement of the USSR in defeating Japan. US Secretary of War Stimson wrote a memorandum to Truman from 2 on July 1945 d: “Having started the invasion, we will have, in my opinion, to end it with even more fierce battles than those that took place in Germany. As a result, we will suffer huge losses and we will be forced to leave Japan. " Therefore, during the Berlin conference, despite the information received about the successful testing of the atomic bomb in America, Truman emphasized that "the United States expects help from the USSR." In response, Stalin assured that "the Soviet Union will be ready to take action by mid-August and that it will keep its word."

The plans of the Soviet command in the Far East envisaged the conduct of the Manchurian offensive, the South Sakhalin offensive and the Kuril landing operations, as well as the landing of a large landing force on the island of Hokkaido.

The landing operation on this island was to begin from the territory of South Sakhalin after its release.

On August 1945, 87, Stalin confirmed the order to prepare the 1th Rifle Corps for participation in the landing operation on Hokkaido Island. Marshal Vasilevsky, following the instructions of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, ordered the commander of the troops of the 2st and XNUMXnd Far Eastern fronts, the Pacific fleet and the Air Force in the Far East to be ready for an operation in Hokkaido by the end of August 23, 1945.

By this time, the leadership of the United States already had a concrete plan for the occupation of the Japanese metropolis by the armed forces of four states - the USA, Great Britain, the USSR and China.

In determining the occupation zones, the Americans proceeded from the fact that the central region of the main Japanese island of Honshu with a developed infrastructure should be controlled by the United States. Kyushu Island was supposed to highlight the UK. The backward agrarian regions of the island of Shikoku were intended for Chinese troops.

The assumed Soviet occupation zone by area even exceeded the American one. The USSR was supposed to deploy its military units not only on the whole island of Hokkaido (the second largest among the Japanese islands), but also to occupy the north-eastern part of Honshu.

However, the possession of the atomic bomb prompted Truman to completely abandon the plan for the allocation for the USSR of the occupation zone on the Japanese islands. Truman admitted in his memoirs: “Although I fervently wanted to involve the USSR in the war with Japan, then, based on the difficult experience of Potsdam, I became firmly convinced not to allow the Soviet Union to take part in governing Japan. In my heart I decided that after defeating Japan, all power in this country will be handed over to General MacArthur. "

Moreover, in the general order No. 15 sent to Stalin by 1 on August of the surrender of the Japanese armed forces, Truman “forgot” to indicate that the Japanese garrisons in the Kuril Islands should surrender to the Soviet troops. This was a signal that Truman might violate the Yalta agreement on the transition of the Kuriles to the Soviet Union.

Stalin responded with restraint, but firmly, proposing to make the following amendments to General Order No. 1: "Include all Kuril Islands in the area of ​​surrender of the Japanese armed forces to the Soviet troops, which, according to the decision of the three powers in Crimea, should come into the possession of the Soviet Union.

Include in the area of ​​the surrender of the Japanese armed forces to the Soviet troops the northern half of the island of Hokkaido, adjacent to the La Perouse Strait, located between Sakhalin Island and Hokkaido.

The demarcation line between the northern and southern half of the island of Hokkaido should be drawn along the line running from the city of Kushiro along the eastern shore of the island to the city of Rumoe on the western shore of the island, with the inclusion of these cities in the northern half of the island. "

Explaining the desirability of obtaining the occupation area in the territory of Japan itself, Stalin pointed out that "this ... is of particular importance for Russian public opinion. As you know, the Japanese in 1919-1921 kept the entire Soviet Far East under occupation of their troops. Russian public opinion was would be seriously offended if the Russian troops did not have an area of ​​occupation in any part of the actual Japanese territory "(Impcommiss: And here the Leader of all Nations is always right - me, as an individual part of Russian public opinion," t "and resent the absence of a Soviet occupation of Japanese islands!). Stalin called his proposals modest and expressed the hope that they would not meet objections.

Truman agreed "to include all the Kuril Islands in the area, which should surrender to Soviet troops in the Far East." As for the second proposal for the occupation of the northern part of Hokkaido, it was rejected by Truman. Moreover, on behalf of the American government, he expressed a desire "to have rights to aviation bases for land and sea aircraft on one of the Kuril Islands, preferably in the central group. "

Not concealing his displeasure with Truman’s response, Stalin rather sharply refused to provide the United States with bases in the Kuril Islands, stating that “requirements of this kind are usually made either to a defeated state or to such a federal state that is itself unable to protect“ part of its territory. ” it was given to understand that, in accordance with the Yalta agreements, the USSR has the right to dispose of the Kuril Islands at its discretion.

On August 22, in the first half of the day, Stalin ordered Marshal Vasilevsky to suspend preparations for the landing on Hokkaido. And 27 August 45, Chief of Staff of the High Command of the Soviet Forces in the Far East, Colonel-General Ivanov sent a Supreme order "To avoid creating conflicts and misunderstandings regarding the Allies, categorically prohibit sending any ships and planes to Hokkaido island."

So it was decided to "make the occupation of Japan exclusively an American enterprise."

PS Among the further possibilities were the creation of the Japanese People’s Democratic Republic from the Soviet occupation zone along the lines of the GDR and the DPRK while dividing Germany and Korea occupied by the allies, respectively, and leaving Japan united along the lines of post-occupied Austria.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. YARY
    +10
    26 March 2012 08: 08
    The article mistakenly discusses the concept- "Russian society", more correctly "Soviet"-and this is another calico.
    Although Stalin was right-Now there would be less squeak about the mythical rights of Japan to our islands! And in general, everything would have turned out differently.
    This is a missed opportunity.
    1. +10
      26 March 2012 09: 36
      How to say, Stalin considered himself Russian, of Georgian origin! And a toast after the victory, he delivered for the Russian people. And for the Anglo-Saxons, we are all Russian, regardless of nationality.
      1. recitatorus
        +3
        26 March 2012 18: 23
        Yesterday I watched an interview with Ruud Gullit, where he recalled the 88th European Championship, and so, Gullit recalls in English: -That game with the Russians began for us ... etc. And the host translates: That game with the USSR team! ..
        So you are right, we are all Russian to them!
  2. Slayer
    +10
    26 March 2012 08: 10
    It was necessary to send Americans and together with China to occupy it)))) there would be less problems with it right now
    1. Sergh
      +15
      26 March 2012 08: 21
      This is another fundamental meaning in the Kuril Islands. No handouts either to the amers, nor to the more Yap in their nagging islands. The islands are for them a conversation-magila, forget forever that there are such somewhere!
      And if some Japanese sees with binoculars, let him think that this is a mirage.
  3. predator
    +16
    26 March 2012 08: 11
    The Group of Soviet Forces in Japan would sound nice.
    1. Sniper 1968
      +5
      26 March 2012 09: 06
      predator,
      GSVIA. +. good lol
  4. +9
    26 March 2012 08: 12
    The article once again convinced that politics takes into account the opinion of the strong and capable of doing good in response. This was successfully demonstrated by the states then, they are demonstrating to this day. If they feel impunity, they go to pieces, putting on all the norms of international law, and as soon as they see an opportunity to take a pill, in response to their actions, they begin to "remember" and "listen".
    1. YARY
      +8
      26 March 2012 08: 41
      Uv. esaul. You rightly said about "nakostlyat" and in this regard, I recall the dispute about the AUG, and why the United States is fighting around the world, and that's why they are fighting. They support the "Fear Me!" And AUG is their face of a strong power capable of nagging at any moment.
      So we need aircraft carriers like air.
      Sorry distracted from the topic.
      1. +6
        26 March 2012 09: 01
        Quote: Ardent
        Sorry distracted from the topic.

        Salute, buddy. Well, I was distracted, but, as one of the commanders said - "You did not fulfill my order! But ... you did not fulfill it well. Well done!" So here too - well distracted! Today, no one denies that Russian aircraft carriers are needed as elements of "power projection." The plans have already been laid, and while there are no aircraft carriers, Russia is acquiring Mistrals, which is also not bad.
        1. +2
          26 March 2012 11: 50
          Whatever they say, the two Mistral bought to which fleet they will be assigned, but it seems to me they will go exclusively to the Black Sea Fleet and there they will control the situation near the coasts of Georgia and Turkey.
          1. +1
            26 March 2012 15: 42
            Quote: Sith Lord
            Whatever they say, the two Mistral bought to which fleet they will be assigned, but it seems to me they will go exclusively to the Black Sea Fleet and there they will control the situation near the coasts of Georgia and Turkey.

            Greetings buddy. Yes, it may be so. To me personally - it’s all the same, if only it would benefit Russia. And the Black Sea region is a very disturbing region and they are there, easily, come in handy.
            1. Sergh
              0
              26 March 2012 16: 25
              What are you, guys, some such Mistral on the Black Sea, what are you doing to this lake, and at worst, there is a land border with Georgia, and there is still a BDK on the Black. Probably remember 10.08.08g. a group of Russian ships came out ..., yes, I’ve found it, look:

              http://rutube.ru/tracks/1041447.html

              And here is the large landing ship "Saratov" of the Black Sea Fleet, which took a direct part in that campaign, it will be mentioned in the news.

          2. biglow
            0
            26 March 2012 18: 20
            for Georgians and one Mistar is enough. Especially with the name of Sevastopol
          3. -1
            26 March 2012 22: 00
            The purchase of Mistrals is a shame in my mind for Russia - there were very good Soviet helicopter carrier projects that needed to be developed and built up !!! Here, at the construction of such a large-scale project as a helicopter carrier, a generation of new young scientists and working specialists would be educated ... And if you just buy it, then why not buy a couple of aircraft carriers from Amer - they are already ready and you don’t need a lot more dough :)) )
            If Russia cannot even build a helicopter carrier, then what kind of talk can there be about aircraft carriers?
        2. 755962
          +1
          26 March 2012 12: 05
          Quote: esaul
          Russian aircraft carriers are needed,

          And not just necessary, but vital. "Who owns the sea - owns the land and all its wealth" Alfred Mahan: the battle for supremacy at sea, the marine economy.
          1. +1
            26 March 2012 22: 07
            In the days of the USSR, we ruled the sea without aircraft carriers - and with simple merchant ships we transported missiles to Cuba and took the whole West for tomatoes :))) The Soviet peace fleet was in every corner of the planet as a symbol of the peaceful presence of our country - this was our opposite policy amerskoy - but the enemy always knew that nearby invasive ships somewhere invisible and therefore especially terrible underwater Soviet bear :))))))))))))
        3. -1
          26 March 2012 21: 56
          It’s rather not plans, but a utopia if you can figure out what it will cost Russia ... Yes, and there are not enough people left who designed and built Soviet aircraft carriers - unfortunately ... But to create new scientific schools and educate top-notch specialists are thief officials know how ...
      2. -1
        26 March 2012 21: 53
        Who are you going to crutch in the Arctic? And who in the Far East? The USSR pursued a smarter policy - building a thunderous nuclear submarine fleet and at the same time a relatively small and "peace-loving" surface fleet ... And the amers knew our real capabilities very well and therefore and only therefore went to sign START-1 - equally !!!
  5. +9
    26 March 2012 08: 14
    A well-written article from the cycle The History of Diplomacy .. It will be useful for many hotheads on the Kuril Islands issue ... The only thing that bothers me is that the author was kind of afraid of the depth of the presentation and crumpled the end ... There is no logical conclusion ... But the article gets its plus
  6. Sergh
    0
    26 March 2012 08: 19
    Here in this is another important sense in the Kuril Islands. No handouts either to the amers, nor to the more Yap in their nagging islands. Islands for them are a conversation-magila, forget chpam, that there are such somewhere!
  7. +5
    26 March 2012 08: 34
    A good informative article in terms of history! Plus! And it’s good that we limited ourselves to the Kuril Islands! In the 90s we would have lost them due to the unification of Japan, as well as East Germany.
    1. recitatorus
      +3
      26 March 2012 18: 28
      And the trailer, Sergo, the Japanese would also have taken the Kuril Islands! And Gorbachev would give without looking! Think of the Kuril Islands! Yes, take it!
      1. +2
        26 March 2012 21: 40
        recitatorus,
        Here I am about the same!
  8. +11
    26 March 2012 08: 54
    Here is an example of how to defend our interests ... and a real look at the then political circumstances ... That is what Stalin was different from ... Roughly speaking, he always bit off as much as he could eat ... plus ...
  9. patriot2
    +5
    26 March 2012 08: 54
    Necessary and up-to-date information. Useful for hotheads who consider the USSR an invader of Japan. We took our toll, though not everything we wanted. And the Japanese next time will be thinking with whom and how to be friends. However, after Hiroshima, Nagasaki-Fukushima. And they have no correct conclusions. Give them the Kuril Islands !? And huh hu not ho ho! angry
    1. +1
      27 March 2012 09: 35
      Quote: patriot2
      Useful for hotheads who consider the USSR an invader of Japan

      The author himself provokes such an opinion. The name itself hints that the USSR had a plan for the occupation of Japan. But the USSR did not have such a plan. The United States had a plan for the occupation of Japan by international forces, which ultimately led to the unilateral occupation of the Japanese islands, only the United States.
      1. +1
        27 March 2012 20: 20
        Repeatedly met copies of Japanese maps on which the territories of the Soviet Union were indicated, which were to go to the Mikado possessions in the event of a Japanese victory. And this is Kamchatka, the Far Eastern regions, a significant part of Siberia (almost to the Urals) ...
        In comparison with these scales, the plans for the occupation of Japan (and even more so the Kuril Islands!) Look pale and painful ...
  10. Sniper 1968
    +7
    26 March 2012 09: 17
    The Japanese should kiss our hands, and they squint unkindly ... I liked how Stalin besieged Truman about the Kuril Islands. Clearly and clearly. Then, with the strongest army in the world, we could afford it ... Good luck to everyone.
  11. Bat1stuta
    +5
    26 March 2012 09: 48
    Americans in their style ...
    Caring about public opinion, the inner circle of President Truman began to speak out in favor of occupying Japan together with the allied states ...

    the warriors are bad, they care about public opinion, are there any lace on their uniforms, are there dry closets ... everyone understands that this so-called strongest army in the world is afraid of its knees trembling, a serious enemy where you really need to fight and not bomb women and children ... request
  12. +3
    26 March 2012 10: 23
    Add my ..
    The Russian Foreign Ministry nevertheless reacted to "Yaroslavna's cry" - the US ambassador to Tallinn about the bombing.
    It would be nice for our Foreign Ministry to react also on the topic of the atomic bombing of Japan by the United States.
    So that the Japanese don't forget ... who bombed them and who "rescued" them from further bombing.
    If the Kwantung Army had not surrendered, cut "alive", Japan would have resisted for a long time. Well, the Americans would have bombed.
    I think so.
  13. wax
    +3
    26 March 2012 10: 31
    It follows that as a result, the coast of Hokkaido became a border and no islands stuttered about any islands for the American zone (or the Japanese, which is the same in this context). Signed: I. Stalin, G. Trumen.
  14. +3
    26 March 2012 11: 32
    Yes .. it’s a shame that now Japan is completely deprived of independence .. and it is something like a colony of amers, I think it’s unlikely that the Americans will ever let them go, it’s very beneficial for them to have such a bridgehead near Russia .. And once again I repeat that even the upbringing of new generations in Japan goes under the control of amers with inciting hatred of the Russians .. already about half of the young population of Japan is sure that the Russians made him armageddon ..

    Here, by the way, is an interesting interview of Leontyev on Japan and the Kuril Islands:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phgw82t_Hys
  15. PabloMsk
    +1
    26 March 2012 14: 30
    Thank God that Japan was left to the Japanese after the war.
    And now there would not be such an amazing country on the map of the planet.
    1. 0
      26 March 2012 20: 26
      Yes, thank God that the Amers did not have enough atomic bombs.
  16. +4
    26 March 2012 19: 28
    The article focuses somewhat incorrectly. The operation to occupy Japan by a multinational force was developed under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It was he who wanted the most active participation of the USSR in the post-war structure of Japan. The draft State Department then stipulated: “a) Japan must return the territories captured by it as a result of aggressive wars; b) during the period of military occupation, the Japanese government will cease to exist as a political unit. Only ministries with administrative functions (internal affairs, finance, healthcare, etc.) are preserved, which will continue their activities under the leadership of the Allied administration; c) the allied powers that fought against Japan will participate in the occupation of Japan and its administration. The occupation service will also be carried out by contingents from Asian countries (China, India, the Philippines, etc.), so that there is no impression that the war against Japan was a war of the white race against the yellow ”(Source: History of Diplomacy, vol. IV, p. . 667.).
    However, the Truman administration began to deviate from these principles and began to actively implement measures to preserve in Japan the monopolies, imperial power and court bureaucracy on which the United States could rely in its policy in the Far East.

    American politicians were negotiating with Japanese diplomats that Japan should capitulate before the USSR entered the war. It was on this basis that the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the review, “Attitude of Public Opinion of the United Nations towards Japan on the Eve of the Potsdam Declaration,” wrote: “Among Americans who maintain faith in the military goals of the United Nations, but who do not trust the Soviet Union, are afraid of it, their moods are quite strong in favor of reconciliation with Japan ”{1044}. The United States, Britain and China sought to achieve the same goals by preparing and publishing the text of the Potsdam Declaration on Japan without the participation of the USSR (History of Diplomacy, vol. IV, p. 689.).
    Be alive at that time, US President F. D. Roosevelt history went a completely different way. I am sure that there would be no atomic bombing of Japanese cities.
    "PS Among the further opportunities appeared as the creation of the Japanese People's Democratic Republic from the Soviet zone of occupation on the model of the GDR and the DPRK with the division of Germany and Korea, occupied by the allies, respectively, and the leaving of Japan as a united model of post-occupied Austria.

    The author, before writing PS, should have pointed out that the USSR and, in particular, Stalin, always stood for a single German state. Its section is the result of an undeclared cold war.
  17. LiRoy
    +1
    26 March 2012 21: 08
    Beauty, not a card. Yes, and the Americans are great, in their best traditions. Just as they hurried with their bomb, they really were eager to test and show the results to the whole world. Although they still achieved their goal, the Japanese are still wiping their soles and are afraid to sneeze again without permission, and they put us out as a scarecrow, which enslaved their northern territories.
    1. -1
      26 March 2012 22: 11
      I think that if it weren’t for their bomb and amers and our grandfathers, they would have died much more when the Japanese islands were taken ...
      That's just why it was necessary to bomb the city and not for example a military base - for me this is still inexplicable ... This of course is blood on their hands ...
      1. LiRoy
        0
        26 March 2012 22: 48
        It was necessary to squeeze out of the current situation with Japan at the end of the war all that was possible, following the example of the Americans.
  18. Ohrim
    +1
    30 March 2012 16: 50
    I propose to name the islands of Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu ..... right up to Okinawa the continuation of the Kuril archipelago (Still-more-southern Kuril Islands) and include them in the Russian Federation, which the Emperor and the Cabinet of ex-Japan should be informed of
  19. 0
    26 May 2012 12: 14
    It would be nice if Japan were divided.
    1. 0
      10 December 2013 16: 52
      Quote: Deniska999
      It would be nice if Japan were divided.


      Let me ask you, who is good? Korea ripped-you feel good, the Koreans are good? The Chinese, yes! -Good!
      Do not wish your neighbor what you do not want for yourself.
      But you are not alone. And not the first who wanted it.

      I.V. Stalin was apparently offended by the Japanese for the defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese war that the tsarist government suffered, and he came up with the idea of ​​Sovietizing part of Japan with joining the USSR and / or creating the Japanese People’s Island in Hokkaido and the northern part of Honshu Island Democratic Republic (YNDR). court historians prepared the leader an analytical note about the incident of Vasily Golovnin, that is, the Russian-Japanese conflict of 1811 - 1813, which put unsettled Russian-Japanese relations on the brink of war. The facts rigged so that the island of Matsmai (Japanese Hokkaido) allegedly became part of Japan only in 1869. Until that time, they say, the Japanese lived only on the southern tip of the island, where there was a small Japanese principality. The rest of the territory was inhabited by Ainu, which even outwardly differed sharply from the Japanese - white-faced, with a strong hairline, for which the Russians called them shaggy smokers. At the very end of the 18th century, Russians gathered yasak from the inhabitants of the northern coast of Hokkaido. All these fantasies gave Joseph Stalin an occasion during the negotiations of the Big Three on the post-war world order to indicate that Hokkaido is not primordially Japanese territory and demand his accession to the USSR.