North Korea has a bomb - South will have one!

34
Nuclear scientists and DPRK rocket engineers are making amazingly quick successes. Against the background of their tests and progress in technology about the nuclear bomb, they were also thinking in South Korea. The pillow has three options.





In South Korea, they are seriously talking about creating their own nuclear arsenal. Too dangerous neighbor is nearby. And no UN sanctions and angry statements from the “world community” led by the United States are not intimidating. Even the threats of Mr. Trump on Twitter are not terrible. Smiling Kim Jong-un Know yourself rocket launches before smokes. He is thinking about uniting the two Koreas and spreading the Juche ideology to Seoul.

But in South Korea, the Juche is not believed in a bright future. And talk in Seoul and go about developing your own nuclear weaponsand about the deployment of American weapons in the country. However, the latter idea in the Republic of Korea is not officially approved.

The Presidential Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan recently stated that the United States is not considering the issue of deploying nuclear weapons in the country. “We never thought that we should host US nuclear assets,” the administration’s official quotes "Lenta.ru". “We respect the global non-proliferation regime and continue to build our policies within this framework.”

But not so simple.

First, the South Korean media wrote that the issue of deploying American nuclear weapons was discussed during the visit of Defense Minister Son Yong Moon to Washington, where he met by James Mattis (head of the Pentagon). And flashed messages that Mr. Moon allegedly himself hinted at a similar opportunity (about accommodation).

Secondly, it was from here that the information came that Seoul was still considering the issue of deploying the American nuclear shield in opposition to the weapons of North Korea. Consideration of the "issue" contributes to the difficult situation in Northeast Asia. This was confirmed by scientists.

“We can say with great precision that this issue [of the deployment of American nuclear weapons in Kazakhstan] was discussed at a meeting of two ministers [Son Yong Moon and D. Mattis],” said "RT" Russian Korean studies professor, Kukmin University in Seoul Andrei Lankov.

Lankov also knows the reason why the administration of the South Korean president publicly denies such a possibility: “Such negotiations may irritate some supporters of the current government, although not even the majority. It is not excluded that now President Moon Zhe Ying and his advisers simply do not want to reveal all the cards. ”

According to the scientist, the situation in northeast Asia is such that Seoul is seriously considering the idea of ​​deploying an American nuclear shield on its territory as opposed to North Korea’s nuclear weapons.

There is another expert opinion. “We already know that the South Korean military can do such things behind their backs, because in May of this year they lied to the newly elected president that they have not six PRO THAAD launchers, but six. Part of the South Korean generals have a servile admiration for the Americans, ”Yevgeny Kim, a leading researcher at the Center for Korean Studies at the Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told RT. At the same time, "at the political level, there can be no talk about the deployment of American tactical missiles in South Korea for the simple reason that then it fully justifies in the eyes of even the South Korean and American public all the actions of this country in building its own nuclear weapons."

The return of the US nuclear arsenal to the land of Kazakhstan in 2017 was raised by the leadership of the leading opposition party, the Korean Freedom Party. The current president of South Korea, Moon Jae Ying, represents the Toburo left-liberal Democratic Party, and she has a negative attitude to such ideas.

But this does not mean that Seoul will be deaf to nuclear initiatives. The current president fears that in a conflict with the DPRK, the Americans will not come to the defense of an ally. “Now in South Korea, there is great concern about whether the country can count on a military alliance with the United States, which has been the basis of the entire South Korean military strategy for more than half a century,” emphasizes Andrey Lankov. “There are fears that when North Korea gets an opportunity to deliver nuclear strikes on American cities, the Americans will decide not to exchange Seoul for San Francisco.”

Such an assumption, we note, has every reason. As long as Mr. Trump rolls empty sentences in the net, the young energetic DPRK leader is building missiles, conducting tests, spitting on UN sanctions and threatening to turn to ashes not only San Francisco, but also Washington. So much so that Southern California is afraid of a “catastrophic” nuclear strike by North Koreans: officials are even thinking about evacuation! Already plans compiled by.

Noting the threats to North Korea, the United States Regional Intelligence Center in Los Angeles issued a sixteen-page bulletin warning that a nuclear attack on Southern California would be "catastrophic." The bulletin calls on officials to take action against the nuclear threat.

The paper said that the intercontinental ballistic missile produced by the DPRK could reach the west coast of the United States. “The propaganda spots of North Korea show the ruins of San Francisco and Washington,” the report provides a strong argument.

Some financial calculations have been made. Americans can count money. According to Rand, only one nuclear explosion in the port of Long Beach can cause damage of more than a trillion dollars, not to mention the massive loss of life and destruction of infrastructure. “Rand” warns of panic among the population, environmental pollution, problems with transport and so on.

And Donald Trump, the president of the superpower, can do absolutely nothing with the leader of little North Korea!

That is why they do not trust Americans in South Korea. The expert is right: the Americans would not “trade” Seoul for San Francisco.

In addition to the return of American nuclear weapons to the peninsula in the form of a security guarantee of Kazakhstan, another idea is being considered: the development of the Seoul missile program.

Public opinion polls in Kazakhstan show that more than half of South Korean citizens want nuclear weapons at their disposal. In early September, 2017, this opinion was expressed by 60% of respondents (Gallup Institute survey data). And there is no doubt that South Korea will have enough financial and technical capabilities to take a place in the club of nuclear powers. In addition, the first to develop nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula began not at all northerners, but southerners, said the above-mentioned Andrei Lankov in the newspaper "News".

It was in 1970's. In secrecy, scientists and engineers worked to build a nuclear bomb. They managed to make good progress, but the Americans stopped the project. Today, other South Koreans still believe that the assassination of General Pak Chon Hee in 1979 was organized by the Americans. True, these same Koreans are firmly convinced that the ancient Chinese, as well as the Sumerian civilizations were created by Koreans.

In the current situation, when it may be a question of “exchanging” Seoul for San Francisco, it seems to be a logical step for Southerners to develop their own nuclear weapons. Appropriate weapons will allow the RK to create an independent defense system.

Lankov does not think that it is so simple. As soon as the nuclear program is launched, the country "will be under international sanctions." Sanctions will cause a severe economic crisis. Beijing is a separate danger for Seoul here: China will not accept the entry of South Korea into the "nuclear club". For the Republic of Kazakhstan, Japan, Taiwan and Vietnam, who have not the best relations with China, will break out into the “club”. At present, China accounts for about a quarter of South Korean foreign trade, the expert reminds, and the introduction of restrictive measures by Beijing may cause a large-scale economic crisis in South Korea.

There is, we note, another option - intermediate, with some reliance on the international community. More precisely, based on the United States, which in global politics quite often replaces the “global community”.

Anthony Cordesman, a staff member at the Center for Strategic and Defense Studies (Washington), assumes that the United States should not only think about deploying nuclear weapons in South Korea, but also give Seoul the opportunity to get its own nuclear bomb. "They [the United States] must expand nuclear deterrence in order to close South Korea and Japan, and can also decide to either re-deploy modern tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea, or agree to the creation of South Korean nuclear forces," the television channel quoted the American expert. "RT".

Finally, the timing of the development of nuclear weapons. It will not be fast, but very fast!

According to the experts of the newspaper “Chosun Ilbo”, to which the same “RT” refers, in case of need, Seoul can create nuclear weapons in eighteen months.

But what will Comrade Kim from a neighboring country say to this? Only he will answer this question.

* * *


The conclusion is obvious: it is impossible not to take into account the possibility of Seoul developing its own nuclear weapons, but most likely, the Americans will deliver their own weapons to South Korea, thereby achieving two goals: sending an ultimatum "signal" to Kim Jong-un and assuring Seoul of strong allied relations. In the end, after his ominous statements at the UN General Assembly and on Twitter to North Korea, Mr. Trump will have to take some obvious actions: otherwise the allies on the planet will no longer understand him.

If Trump does nothing, and Seoul in one and a half years, despite the danger of UN sanctions, creates its own nuclear weapons, Japan and other regional states will follow the example of South Koreans. The baton will be picked up, of course, in Iran and Saudi Arabia. And the global nuclear arms race will begin ...

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    6 October 2017 07: 01
    ... another smut for us in the Far East ... we should "influence" the southerners ... angry
    1. +4
      6 October 2017 13: 51
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... another smut for us in the Far East ... we should "influence" the southerners ... angry

      That is, you can fuck the vigorous bonbu northerners, but you must "influence" the southerners? What double standards ?! angry
      1. +9
        6 October 2017 13: 59
        Quote: And Us Rat
        That is, you can fuck the vigorous bonbu northerners, but you must "influence" the southerners? What double standards ?!

        I agree! there the Jews have so let the Palestinians give! good
        or maybe not worth it? stop
        and this by chance will not be double standards? wink
        1. +5
          6 October 2017 14: 23
          Quote: SanichSan
          there the Jews have so let the Palestinians give! good
          or maybe not worth it?

          There is a nuance (and purely applied):
          The "Palestinians" do not have a state, there is no discipline, there is no technology and there are no resources to simply keep nuclear weapons under control.
          There is no necessary minimum of parameters (as in North or South Korea) for the responsible possession of such "toys".
          In the Islamic world in general, with this strained, even Pakistan the lion spends a portion of the resources for the maintenance of nuclear weapons to protect it from own fanatics and religiously insane.
          1. +3
            6 October 2017 15: 20
            Dependent states cannot have nuclear weapons, so countries such as Japan, Germany, South Korea do not have them, and their owners will not allow this in the first place.
          2. +3
            6 October 2017 17: 46
            I agree, but ... as always there is BUT! wink
            and how will nuclear weapons help South Korea?
            Northerners spit on the United States, and they immediately respect South Korea? do not make me laugh laughing
            Yes, the desire of the southerners to get a vigorous missile in the background is understandable, but who were they going to influence with such a strong authority? certainly not to the northerners.

            By the way, as far as I remember a vigorous rocket, North Korea does not threaten South Korea at all. or am I missing something? and those who are threatened, and so in nuclear warheads at the very top Yes
            so why would South Korea get nuclear weapons?
            well, purely so .. logically .. you understand that the question is not whether they can create it, but whether they will be allowed to work on it.
          3. +1
            7 October 2017 01: 28
            Oh shaw, are you so worried? If you don’t want to give a nuclear bomb to the Palestinians, let’s give the Irns, they have the Country, the Army of technology and even resources.
            Sha you feel better already? tongue
      2. +1
        7 October 2017 06: 36
        And We Rat Yesterday, 13:51
        What double standards ?! angry

        ... who has doubles? ... among the Jews? ... so everyone knows what to run into again ... wassat
    2. ksp
      +1
      7 October 2017 09: 05
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... another smut for us in the Far East ... we should "influence" the southerners ... angry

      All this smut with Eun will bring nothing but the extra expenses of our budget.
      We will need to invest in leveling the US missile defense system in South Korea, and if the South Caucasus develops its own nuclear weapons (God forbid), then even more so since this could lead to the landslide desire of many countries to get hold of nuclear weapons.
      In the Far East, primarily Japan and the same Myanmar
      According to the Norwegian-based journalist organization Democratic Voice of Burma, its investigation revealed that the Myanmar military junta is taking steps to create an atomic bomb.

      The organization refers to a former military specialist, Say Thein Vin, who allegedly worked at secret Burmese enterprises to create prototypes for missile and nuclear programs. The defector engineer provided reporters with various documentation and photographs regarding the secret developments.

      Read more at RBC:
      http://www.rbc.ru/politics/04/06/2010/5703dad09a7
      9470ab5021675

      what's next ?
      The world and, above all, Russia, will be drawn into the spiral of a nuclear arms race and missile defense.
      And completely out of nowhere.
      And all because of Eun.
      We Russians will not live better from all this.
      This will not add security to us.
      I do not agree to pay Eun’s wish to measure a member with Trump.
      I don’t agree that my children and I would reach the standard of living of S. Korea.
      Who agrees - please - a suitcase, the station - North Korea.
      the living standards of Russians are more important to me than the ambitions of a fat baby doll.
      1. 0
        7 October 2017 19: 51
        Quote: ksp
        the living standards of Russians are more important to me than the ambitions of a fat bobblehead

        It remains to bring it to the baby.
  2. +4
    6 October 2017 07: 06
    It is not for nothing that the United States so diligently escalates the situation and provokes the DPRK. To have your own (American) nuclear weapons and missile defense equipment at the side of Russia and China is not the goal of this entire company?
  3. +1
    6 October 2017 07: 16
    That's just the point, the UK does not have to do something there themselves, who is stopping the deployment of submarines with nuclear weapons on the territory of the UK ?!
  4. 0
    6 October 2017 08: 44
    Eun has completed 50% of his task, Japan remains to rearm the nuclear weapons and everything will be tip-top. good
    1. +1
      6 October 2017 08: 53
      yes so it looks
  5. +2
    6 October 2017 08: 53
    [/ quote] Today, other South Koreans still believe that the assassination of General Park Jung Hee in 1979 was organized by the Americans. True, these same Koreans are unshakably convinced that the ancient Chinese, as well as Sumerian civilizations were created by Koreans. [Quote]
    Something it reminds me very much of Ukraine today. And didn’t the ancient Koreans dig the Pacific Ocean? And the land in the Tibet region was piled up.
  6. +6
    6 October 2017 09: 19
    Southerners are clearly not doing what they need
    ---------
    For the first time in South Korea, there has been an excess of the elderly over the young. Reforms in childcare, housing and the labor market will be extremely difficult to remedy. Uh-huh, that's the opposite of the price of the "Korean miracle". One child in a family - in a generation the miracle will end. Comrade Kim smiles slyly - his birth rate is in order. 
    ---
    Even 25-30 years and southerners crawl to the northerners on their knees.
    1. +2
      6 October 2017 10: 07
      Then how do we live!
  7. +4
    6 October 2017 10: 10
    American nuclear weapons have always hit the territory of South Korea and the United States has always guaranteed nuclear deterrence for the South Caucasus, so for the DPRK, the American nuclear weapons in Korea do not change anything.
    If the South Caucasus itself makes its nuclear deterrent then the stay of the Americans in the South Caucasus is losing its meaning and the Yankees should go home, and the DPRK is not going to attack the South Caucasus anyway, so this option is even better for the DPRK. South Caucasus also does not dare to attack the DPRK so there will be peace on the peninsula which is the goal of the DPRK policy.
    South Korean and Japanese nuclear weapons will not succeed in frightening the DPRK, and even less so China, but the US must go home with its nuclear umbrella.
  8. +1
    6 October 2017 10: 20
    And the world nuclear arms race will begin ...

    There will be no race, but only normal exercise of the right to self-defense by states. Most importantly, nuclear weapons will bring world peace.
  9. +2
    6 October 2017 10: 22
    The USSR (now Russia) as opposed to the United States for nuclear weapons, India as opposed to Pakistan, England to France (well, if you look at the ears with a glance over history, and they’re about the same) ... So let the DPRK have RK - let it be measured there on the peninsula wassat .... So Israel needs to oppose Iran or select its nuclear weapons. It's no use scaring neighbors feel ..So China what And let America and China hold back - they’re exceptional, they can butt out with two fellow
    Everything, all settled down, you can relax wassat
    Happy Smile Day to all smile (Although in such a hemorrhoid with nuclear weapons it is not up to smiles)
  10. +15
    6 October 2017 11: 18
    Isn’t it easier to drop one bomb on both Koreas at once?
    Then she will immediately become one
    And the brains stop doing everything and everything
    1. +3
      6 October 2017 11: 45
      In this case, the Korean peninsula will become a bunch of small islands what
  11. 0
    6 October 2017 12: 01
    Yes, Kim has no bomb! Crap all this.
    1. +1
      6 October 2017 13: 00
      Quote: Echo
      Yes, Kim has no bomb! Crap all this.

      Correctly. He does not have a nuclear / hydrogen bomb. He has a nuclear / hydrogen mine, which can be laid in tunnels under the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
  12. +1
    6 October 2017 12: 59
    Any developed country (technologically and economically), having nuclear technologies (like nuclear power plant reactors), the theoretical ones have all the necessary technologies.
    1. 0
      6 October 2017 18: 10
      Especially a country that actively exports nuclear reactors and enriches uranium. In fact, they only need to collect the necessary materials and develop a fuse, and the bomb is ready. South Korea already has missiles.
      Naro [1] (box 나로 호, originally designated Korea Space Launch Vehicle # 1, KSLV-1) is a one-time two-stage South Korean launch vehicle, created in close collaboration with Russian experts. According to the project, it is capable of outputting more than 100 kg of payload to a height of up to 300 km with an inclination of 38o.
      1. 0
        6 October 2017 18: 27
        Quote: BlackMokona
        Especially a country that actively exports nuclear reactors and enriches uranium. In fact, they only need to collect the necessary materials and develop a fuse, and the bomb is ready. South Korea already has missiles.

        I read an article of some big lump that (in a number of translations it was written “even”, but this cannot be definitely said - alas, especially English) Ukraine, if she wants, can do this within 5-7 years. Another thing is what kind of reaction will follow.
        1. 0
          6 October 2017 18: 38
          Ukraine has too high a level of corruption, stealing the entire budget for nuclear weapons.
          1. 0
            6 October 2017 19: 29
            That's what I'm talking about. IF they want. Then they will cope with corruption.
  13. 0
    6 October 2017 14: 39
    Yeah ... Trump's politics seem to have come to a standstill. Complete and irrevocable. Any action or inaction will only make it worse. He just wanted to scare the Koreans and the Japanese a little, so that they would buy weapons faster and more in the states. But it turned out like that: on the horizon, there is a complete loss of state influence on both of these countries, which will catch up with Kimova Bonba. Instead of business, a simple geopolitical catastrophe of a nuclear scale threatens.
  14. BAI
    0
    6 October 2017 16: 07
    Between Seoul and Pyongyang - 198 km. What is the use of nuclear weapons on the peninsula? In the confrontation between the USA and the DPRK, it is needed. In the confrontation between the DPRK and the Republic of Kazakhstan, it makes no sense.
    1. 0
      6 October 2017 18: 39
      China restrain from sending millions of volunteers in the direction of the DPRK,
  15. 0
    7 October 2017 08: 48
    "And Donald Trump, president of the superpower, can do absolutely nothing with the leader of small North Korea!" ////

    Do not rush to conclusions. Preparing a war takes time.
  16. 0
    7 October 2017 10: 11
    Quote: Nix1986
    That's just the point, the UK does not have to do something there themselves, who is stopping the deployment of submarines with nuclear weapons on the territory of the UK ?!

    Nothing prevents, but there is no point. The boat can only be placed at a naval base (I apologize for saying common truths).
    About the quantity. Such bases in South Korea can be counted on the fingers of one hand. They are within reach of even the very old North Korean Hwason-5 missiles. Further. It does not make sense to place boats with ballistic missiles there. They will not be able to hit targets on the territory of North Korea, as Trident’s minimum firing range is almost double the distance to the northern borders of the DPRK
    It’s certainly possible to place “Ohio” with the Tomahawk CR there, then the range is redundant, and such a base will still be goal No. 1 for the DPRK. It’s easier to place the same boats in Okinawa.
    You can only place airborne weapons in the form of aviation nuclear bombs. And the minimum number of heavy bombers (for the same reasons as boats). According to the logic of TB, it’s generally not worth placing there. Well, nuclear warheads for tactical and operational tactical missiles are also possible (well, these are more likely weapons of the battlefield)

    Quote: Blue Cop
    Isn’t it easier to drop one bomb on both Koreas at once?

    Rubber?

    Quote: WarNoob
    Any developed country (technologically and economically), having nuclear technologies (like nuclear power plant reactors), the theoretical ones have all the necessary technologies.

    As far as I remember, about 15-20 years ago, either the South Caucasus or Japan (ring, I don’t remember, but it doesn’t matter. They are close in terms of economic potential) and tested the laser technology for isotope separation. The bottom line is that there is no need for a huge number of centrifuges. Several grams of highly enriched uranium were obtained. After that, the installation was placed under the control of the IAEA. What does it mean. And only that, if necessary, because of their industrial potential, these countries will be able to build up significantly more materials for nuclear bombs than Eun.

    Quote: BlackMokona
    Especially a country that actively exports nuclear reactors and enriches uranium. In fact, they only need to collect the necessary materials and develop a fuse, and the bomb is ready. South Korea already has missiles.
    Naro [1] (box 나로 호, originally designated Korea Space Launch Vehicle # 1, KSLV-1) is a one-time two-stage South Korean launch vehicle, created in close collaboration with Russian experts. According to the project, it is capable of outputting more than 100 kg of payload to a height of up to 300 km with an inclination of 38o.

    Southerners will not even need this missile. They have a large number of Henmu-type missiles with a reach of 500-800 km. And that's enough for the eyes. The total number of about 1700 pcs.

    Quote: WarNoob
    I read an article of some big lump that (in a number of translations it was written “even”, but this cannot be definitely said - alas, especially English) Ukraine, if she wants, can do this within 5-7 years. Another thing is what kind of reaction will follow.

    Ukraine could have done in the early 90s, when their industry was not destroyed. Now only a "dirty" bomb, such as a radiological one using nuclear waste

    Quote: voyaka uh
    "And Donald Trump, president of the superpower, can do absolutely nothing with the leader of small North Korea!" ////

    Do not rush to conclusions. Preparing a war takes time.

    Good idea. For some reason, no one wants to pay attention to it. Indeed, only the “delivery” of fuel and ammunition to advanced bases will require a sufficiently long time. Plus the redeployment of certain units, plus the concentration of ships and submarines with the strengthening of the existing infrastructure and, again, additional fuel and ammunition. Not to mention that it is necessary to adjust existing plans (or make new ones) to have a sufficiently large array of intelligence information. This is not done in a month.
    Suffice it to recall how much time it took to concentrate the coalition forces against Saddam in the First Gulf War