The legend of the Don Cossacks Kharlampy Ermakov and "Quiet Don" Sholokhov

7
The legend of the Don Cossacks Kharlampy Ermakov and "Quiet Don" SholokhovAccording to Mikhail Sholokhov - the author of the epic novel “The Quiet Don”, his favorite hero in the book was Grigory Melekhov. The image of this hero, his fate and even his appearance were written off from a real person - Kharlampiy Vasilyevich Ermakov.

Sholokhov was personally acquainted with the prototype of the main character of his novel, they often met and talked in 1926, when the writer was collecting materials for his work. The author came to the village of Veshenskaya, and he and Yermakov spent long nights talking, smoking and arguing. A letter is kept in one of the archives in which the writer asks Ermakov to meet. Sholokhov was then very interested in the events of the 1919 of the year related to the fate of the Don Cossacks during the Veshensky Uprising.

It is not by chance that the author turned to Harlampy Yermakov. The fate of this legendary man was not easy. He was born on the farm Antipovskoy Veshenskaya stanitsa, now it is the Rostov region. He grew up in an ordinary Cossack family, graduated from a local parish school. The childhood and youth of Yermakov were not distinguished by something special, they passed like the majority of his countrymen.

Kharlampy began his military service in 1913, at the age of 22. Faithfully served the Tsar and the Fatherland. Then he was sent to the Russian-German front, where he proved himself a hero. Exist historical Information about the mastery of Ermakov’s saber. Eyewitnesses of those events called Ermakova "a brave grunt." His blow was of tremendous power, and he could cut with a saber from both hands. Harlampy repeatedly used this advantage in battle, approaching the enemy from the opposite side, which made him by surprise. Grigory Melekhov was awarded the perfection of mastery of this technique by Mikhail Sholokhov in the novel "Quiet Don".

The young Cossack took part in the First World War. Bravely fought, had more than a dozen wounds, contusion. He showed himself only from a decent side, was awarded the St. George Medal “For Bravery” four times, received four St. George crosses (Grigory Melekhov had the same awards in the Quiet Don). As a result, he was awarded the honorary title of cornet, which was equal to the officer's rank. In the autumn of 1916, Harlampy Yermakov was seriously wounded and demobilized.

Soon the 1917 year comes - a year of great changes both in the fate of Russia, and in the fate of the entire Don Cossacks. This year was a turning point for the Cossacks - many were faced with a difficult choice. Initially, Yermakov chose the Soviet authorities, fought in the Podtelkov detachment, and fought against Kaledin. In one of the battles near the village of Likhoy he was wounded and went home for treatment. At this time, his detachment was captured by the rebels, Podtelkova and his loyal soldiers were executed.

In 1919, the Cossack uprising erupts in the Veshenskaya Uprising. Historians claim that the hatred of Lenin and Trotsky for the Cossacks was the cause of mass uprisings. The Central Committee of the RCP (B.) Issues a secret Directive in which it calls for waging a merciless struggle against the upper classes of the Cossacks by means of their total extermination. As a means - mass terror against the rich Cossacks, the confiscation of property and complete disarmament. When retested, if detected weapons - shooting.

After a short period of time, another Directive, no less bloodthirsty, signed by the Donburo of the RCP (b), is issued. This document ordered the arrest of prominent representatives of the villages and farms, to keep them as hostages. In case of detection of weapons from any resident of a village or a farm, shoot the hostages along with the guilty. The red commissars killed everyone. In some places, there was a genuine genocide of the Cossack population. The Cossacks could not stand it, they took up arms, the quiet Don began to stir.

Kharlampy Ermakov elected commander of the rebels, takes an active part in the battles. He fiercely fights for his people, his homeland.

At the same time, a civil war begins in the country. Soon, the Veshensk rebels were united by the White Army. Don General Bogaevsky produces Ermakova, first in the centurions, and a month later - in the captains. In early March, 1920, Yermakov was captured, but numerous eyewitnesses stand up for his beloved saula. The time in the country was “dashing”, good commanders were worth their weight in gold. The command of the Red Army offered Harlampy to form a separate brigade of the remaining White Cossacks. Later this brigade joined the 1-th Cavalry Army of Budyonny. Only in 1923, Yermakov demobilized and returned home.

Approximately the same end and the novel Sholokhov: Gregory Melekhov returns home and on the banks of the Don meets his son. But the fate of Harlampy Yermakov was much more complicated. Just a year he lived with his family. In February, 1924, he was arrested for participating in a counter-revolutionary uprising. The Cossack hero does not deny his participation even under the threat of execution of the whole family. Countrymen Yermakov collected in testimony of his words testimony. In May 1925, the court ruled that the accused was not a voluntary participant in the riots, but was called upon by the district atamanism.

In 1927, Harlampia was arrested again. This time, investigators found eyewitnesses who testified to Yermakov’s personal participation in the execution of the Red Army and anti-Soviet propaganda in the village. Then there was general collectivization throughout the country, the Bolsheviks were afraid of a new uprising, so the court decided to shoot the hero, despite the protest of the regional prosecutor. In June of that year, the sentence was carried out. Thus ended the short but vibrant life of the Don Cossack, which left a deep furrow in history. Harlampy Ermakov was rehabilitated only in the 1989 year, posthumously.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dmb
    0
    22 March 2012 10: 47
    Even if there are no decent words for evaluating the next historical "opus", you should not swear on the site. However, there are clearly grounds for abuse. I'll make a reservation right away. I absolutely agree with V. Pikul in Trotsky's assessment: "The reptile was the most harmful." But the phrase "The hatred of Lenin and Trotsky towards the Cossacks caused the mass uprisings" must at least somehow be justified. Delirium about a worldwide Masonic conspiracy, we will discard this topic of developing people due to the obvious idiocy. And the Cossack gentlemen somehow do not fit in with the ideological opponents of Freemasonry, if only because they hardly knew about its existence in their overwhelming majority. Does not contain history and facts about whipping of any of the above politicians with a whip. So we are talking about an ordinary class struggle, which is not actually denied by the author of the article. For referring to the documents, she writes that they talked about the Cossack elite, which did not suit not only Lenin and Trotsky, but also the same Cossack Podtelkov. And it was not the manner of the persecuted dress that suited them, but their concrete struggle against the new government. So if you write articles about history, and not just another agitation "for" or "against", then it is desirable to support your own assessments of what is happening with something.
    1. Sergio
      +1
      22 March 2012 12: 28
      So about the class struggle is understandable. But this does not justify genocide in relation to the Cossacks.
      Indeed, at the time of the outbreak of the Civil War, the bulk of the people quietly and peacefully sat along the villages.
      With the right approach, the Cossacks themselves would have cut out the provocateurs, agitators and frostbitten.
      And for the most part the Cossacks would not support their chieftains — generals at that very moment, for they had been fighting.
      Yes, in the Quiet Don everything is normally described.
    2. +3
      22 March 2012 15: 02
      dmb, study history carefully and thoughtfully. Pay special attention to the circular letter of the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) dated January 24, 1919. signed by comrade Ya.M. Sverdlov. It was this document that served as the starting point for the beginning of the so-called. "decossackization". And in many places it turned into a real genocide ...
      And it would not hurt to remind you of the phrase of another Bolshevik leader, "Comrade Sergo": "Burn the village of Kalinovskaya!" ... Kalinovskaya was not really burned. They burned down another village - Field Marshal ...
      And as for Comrade Podtelkov ... Well, unfortunately, every nation has its own Judas ...
    3. +3
      22 March 2012 15: 20
      And how do the ideas of Freemasonry differ from the "ordinary class struggle"? The slogans are the same. The goals and methods are the same. The class struggle is one of the forms of Freemasonry's struggle for its goals. Or do you think that the "oppressed classes" act exclusively independently and are not directed by anyone? That for this struggle they self-organize, nominate their own leaders, form their own ideology, etc.? Then at least a couple of examples in the studio. Yes, but the Cossacks were not refined fighters with Freemasonry on the ideological front. But they were opponents MENTALLY. That caused the opposition of the Cossacks to Trotskyist Bolshevism. The partisans of the Second World War were not ideological opponents of fascism and Nazism either. Because the. most of them had no idea about these ideologies. However, this did not prevent them from taking their place in the fight against these ideologies. Arguments such as "the obvious idiocy of this topic developing" are primitive and untenable. IMHO.
      1. dmb
        -1
        22 March 2012 21: 30
        "I, mom, am ready to share your grief, but point by point." Read what constitutes genocide and, if possible, objectively evaluate the use of this term in the comments. and article. Again, if possible. Decide at what moment the "mentality" of the hero of the publication manifested itself so strongly: in Podtelkov's detachment, at General Bogaevsky's, or at the time of commanding a brigade. (of course, it consisted entirely of Jewish commissars, and there was only one Cossack in it - commander Ermakov). And if without mockery, do you seriously think that the Bolsheviks needed extra enemies so much to engage in genocide of the Cossacks peacefully sitting in their homes?
  2. Georg Shep
    +7
    22 March 2012 11: 40
    Glory to the valiant Russian Cossacks, the defenders of the Russian land!
  3. Comrade
    +4
    22 March 2012 13: 51
    And in the title photo, is it Ermakov? Etozh like Kozma Kryuchkov, the hero of World War I ?!
    1. Sergio
      +1
      22 March 2012 17: 35
      He himself is, Kryuchkov.
  4. +15
    4 November 2017 18: 54
    In the photo - Kozma Kryuchkov