Techmash demonstrated self-aiming ammunition

41
Concern "Techmash" presented at the Army-2017 forum a unified planning bomb cassette of SPBE-K PBC-500U.

The new cluster munition is high-tech and contains sub-elements that are made according to the principle of high-precision weapons. The striking elements are programmed for specific types of targets - armored vehicles, rocket and artillery installations - and completely exclude targeting civilian objects.
- noted the first deputy general director of the concern "Techmash" Vladimir Tikhonov.

Techmash demonstrated self-aiming ammunition


One such cartridge can stop the firing battery or tank enemy column. At the same time, when it is dropped, the aircraft does not need to go into the affected area of ​​the enemy’s air defense means, because due to the aerodynamic characteristics, the ammunition, depending on the height of the discharge, can plan for tens of kilometers.

Improved accuracy characteristics achieved through a unique combination of new millimeter radar and infrared ranges in the target search and identification system
- Vladimir Tikhonov reported.

At the same time almost 100-percent reliability class was achieved. Only the domestic electronic component base is used. Also, in the development of ammunition, the requirement of minimizing the terrain is taken into account.

We have all cluster elements programmed to self-destruct after a certain period of time, so that after the end of hostilities the civilian population is not undermined by these munitions. If the striking element did not work for a given target, it simply self-destructs and becomes absolutely safe.
- explained Tikhonov.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    31 August 2017 13: 59
    completely exclude guidance on civilian objects

    They handed over military secrets - now the enemy will disguise armored vehicles as civilian buses.
    1. +14
      31 August 2017 14: 34
      Quote: grandfather_Kostya
      now the enemy will disguise armored vehicles as civilian buses

      I imagined a tank disguised as a "civilian bus." Laughed a lot laughing
      1. +2
        31 August 2017 14: 55
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        I imagined a tank disguised as a "civilian bus." Laughed a lot

        And about the "peaceful Russian tractors ...." did not hear? It will be even funnier. laughing
      2. +7
        31 August 2017 15: 19
        You can also disguise as a picnic arbor ...
      3. aiw
        0
        31 August 2017 20: 48
        They disguised themselves as trucks in the times of WWII in Africa - there was an article on VO.
    2. 0
      31 August 2017 14: 34
      "At the same time, when it is dropped, the aircraft does not need to enter the zone of destruction of air defense systems"
      This is who are going to fight with? Who has air defense with a range of tens of kilometers? Do the Papuans?
      Ponte, Ponte, Ponte ...
      1. 0
        31 August 2017 20: 42
        Are you and I on the same planet?
      2. 0
        31 August 2017 20: 47
        The striking elements are programmed for specific types of targets - armored vehicles, missile and artillery mounts - and completely exclude pointing at civilian targets


        One such cartridge can stop the firing battery or tank column of the enemy.


        If the striking element did not work for the intended purpose, it simply self-destructs and becomes absolutely safe


        I wonder how ammunition that strikes with a continuous sea of ​​fire entire areas can be high-precision and separate the fighter from the tank ??? No other miracle. And ours taught the bombs to ask people: "Is a bearded man just like that or an action movie?" "No, I'm not an action movie." "Well, then I'll go blow your neighbor a meter away from you - he is silent." Somehow very fantastic. I believe that the cassettes are disconnected, but the fact that they directly distinguish between them and are not induced in civilian ways is rubbish.
    3. 0
      1 September 2017 13: 23
      Only domestic electronic component base is used.


      He laughed even more.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      31 August 2017 14: 29
      Work on the planning of the bomb cluster was begun by specialists of the Bazalt GNPP in order to increase the efficiency and combat readiness of the Air Force back in the mid-90s.
      State tests were planned to be completed in 2009.
      A year ago, in a similar report from the Army 2016 forum, they were going to finish the tests in 2016.
      And this year, the sample is presented once again. Twelfth. The first was at "Max 2005". Although there are rumors that it is already the seventeenth. But I have not seen.
      It is a functional analogue of the American corrected cluster bombshell JSOW.
  3. +6
    31 August 2017 14: 06
    very interesting bombs. by itself arose (in fact), and they will try in Syria, I wonder?
    1. +3
      31 August 2017 14: 22
      Quote: newbie
      very interesting bombs

      Such comments are more pleasing to the eye ... goodFor me, this news is also pleasant and surprising. The most amazing and joyful that they managed with their own resources ...
      1. +4
        31 August 2017 14: 47
        eh, with the help of the SK completed the s350, maybe the 3rd generation PTRK like something we farm.
    2. 0
      31 August 2017 20: 34
      Do you really wait for the answer to this question from MO ???? laughing lol
      1. +4
        31 August 2017 21: 03
        Stoler, I am certainly glad that I was able to add fun to you with my comments, but for the full beauty of the picture there is not enough appeal to you. but the essence of your question, I'm not waiting for an answer, I just allowed myself a valid version.
  4. +2
    31 August 2017 14: 24
    The striking elements are programmed for specific types of targets - armored vehicles, missile and artillery mounts - and completely exclude pointing at civilian targets

    I believe. There are no third-generation ATGMs (fired-forgotten), but here are submunitions with artificial intelligence. wassat
    1. +2
      31 August 2017 15: 00
      Quote: professor
      There are no third-generation ATGMs (fired-forgotten), but here are submunitions with artificial intelligence

      Here we are "funny animals" ... and not only you are surprised at this ...
    2. aiw
      0
      31 August 2017 20: 28
      Well, given that your GPS works on its own, without satellites, your reaction is understandable ...
  5. +1
    31 August 2017 14: 27
    what is the news here? with what exactly was the cassette unified?
    Well, yes there are such things, and for a long time already, the news is what?
  6. +10
    31 August 2017 14: 31
    PBC-500U. Application in ATS
    1. +5
      31 August 2017 14: 33
      thanks, good thing.
      1. +9
        31 August 2017 14: 36
        ... Here's another video ... I did not have time to add
  7. +4
    31 August 2017 14: 35
    and they will try in Syria, interesting?
    Already tried on columns of coilers. There were photos of unexploded submunitions.
    The striking elements are programmed for specific types of targets - armored vehicles, missile and artillery mounts - and completely exclude pointing at civilian targets
    Interesting. I believed that only reacts to infrared radiation, i.e. the heat of tanks, cars, armored personnel carriers. And here is for you - it can work on art, ignoring tanks (depending on the program)
    Recently I read about such imported submunitions. I liked the fact that if the submunition did not find a target, it is detonated at a height of 10 m, working as a fragmentation bomb of an air blast. The truth in this case is an expensive mine. But better than on earth, after some time.
    1. +4
      31 August 2017 14: 41
      apparently pushed into the "intellect" new "meanders".
      1. +1
        31 August 2017 15: 00
        Quote: newbie
        apparently pushed into the "intellect" new "meanders".

    2. 0
      31 August 2017 14: 58
      Quote: Black Colonel
      he is blown up at a height of 10 m, working as a fragmentation bomb of an air blast. The truth in this case is an expensive mine. But better than on earth, after some time.
      It is better just on the ground, only immediately when touched, since the probability of being hit by fragments during an explosion above the ground is greater than during an explosion on the ground.
      1. 0
        31 August 2017 15: 46
        Even I did not understand you, you contradict yourself: Better just on earth, only immediately when touched, since the probability of being hit by fragments more than an explosion above the earth. (highlighted in bold)
        Touch is already on the earth.
        1. 0
          31 August 2017 18: 26
          Well why. I was based on the phrase
          Quote: Black Colonel
          if the submunition does not find a target, it is blown up at a height of 10 m, working as a fragmentation bomb of an air blast

          That is, if the projectile did not find a target, it is better for it to explode so as to cause the least damage because it is not clear who the projectile can hook on in this case. That is, it is better for him to explode at the moment of touching the ground (like a mine or a bomb) where he will do less damage than exploding in the air (for manpower at least).
  8. 0
    31 August 2017 16: 43
    I completely did not understand how it affects tanks.
    Inside the bomb there are 15 cumulative bombs. Let's say a planning bomb
    successfully exploded on a tank column.
    How will each bomb find its own tank? They parachute or something lower.
    while looking for a target?
    1. +4
      31 August 2017 17: 18
      The basis of the SPBE-K element is a copper impact core. The characteristics of the destruction of SPBE-K are not yet available in the media, but the ammunition is the development of the SPBE-D ammunition, the elements of which had a core accelerated to 2000 m / s and pierced up to 70 mm equivalent of homogeneous armor. Therefore, we will see SPBE-D.

      SPBE-D was developed at the NGO Basalt. This ammunition is completely self-contained, which is provided by a dual-mode infrared guidance system operating in the ranges of 3-5 μm and 8-14 μm (in the RKB-500 SPBE a separate command module is used for guidance). Each element is equipped with three small parachutes, providing a descent rate of 15-17 m / s. Weighing 14,9 kg, SPBE-D has dimensions of 280 x 255 x 186 mm. After the striking element is ejected from the RBC-500 and the release of parachutes, the IR coordinator and the inclined rectangular wings, which provide rotation, are released. The viewing angle of the IR coordinator is 30 ° and scans the target area at a speed of 6-9 rpm. After the target is detected and the warhead detonation point is determined using the on-board computer (approximately at a height of 150 m), the target is hit. A copper impact core with a diameter of 173 mm and a weight of 1 kg accelerates to a speed of 2000 m / s, is able to penetrate up to 70 mm of armor at an angle of 30 ° to the normal.
      If you are interested more - http://www.dogswar.ru/boepripasy/snariady-rakety/
      7602-bombovaia-kasseta-s-.html
      1. 0
        31 August 2017 17: 46
        Thanks for the explanation. drinks
  9. 0
    31 August 2017 18: 22
    When will he be tested in the country 404? It would be interesting to see the application statistics!
  10. +5
    31 August 2017 18: 39
    Quote: professor
    The striking elements are programmed for specific types of targets - armored vehicles, missile and artillery mounts - and completely exclude pointing at civilian targets

    I believe. There are no third-generation ATGMs (fired-forgotten), but here are submunitions with artificial intelligence. wassat

    What are you gullible. But dull. A signature sufficient for the minimum necessary recognition of an object of a certain type, rather than a specific instance of this type, can be obtained much cheaper than using a thermal imager. The cost of error in the case of cluster munitions is also low, unlike.
    I think it’s slowly reaching you, but to admit that someone has already implemented it, and you cannot, it breaks and wrinkles to you.
    1. aiw
      +1
      31 August 2017 20: 43
      I'm not talking about the fact that one thing is a top view from a distance of 150m for a submunition that is slowly flying on a parachute, and another ATGM at high speed on a low-flying flight is its target in profile, and the requirements for distance and recognition time are much tougher.

      But he is such a Professor ... an atypical Israeli. feel
    2. +1
      1 September 2017 12: 40
      "Signature sufficient for the minimum necessary recognition of an object defined" ////

      Let's talk easier. You want to say that for EVERY bomb, descending by parachute in the search for a target, an infrared video camera is installed? Which determine the type of target: tank, bus, etc. And gives a signal (through a computer installed in EVERY bomb)
      attack (or self-detonation). And there are 15 such bombs (!).
      How much will all this cost?
      Hence the skepticism of the "professor." "Golden" ammunition, and with a dubious result.
      After all, the entire planning bomb may not be detonated above the tank column, but to the side.
      Or the wind will carry parachutes. In general, a dubious idea.
      Isn’t it easier to copy the ancient Hellfire rocket and craft an aiming container?
    3. 0
      1 September 2017 14: 39
      Quote: Mentat
      What are you gullible. But dull. A signature sufficient for the minimum necessary recognition of an object of a certain type, rather than a specific instance of this type, can be obtained much cheaper than using a thermal imager. The cost of error in the case of cluster munitions is also low, unlike.
      I think it’s slowly reaching you, but to admit that someone has already implemented it, and you cannot, it breaks and wrinkles to you.

      I love science fiction, but you (in your comment) do not even have this. Today there are no systems capable of this. The company that created the product capable of distinguishing a pedestrian from a car was acquired by Intel for ~16 BILLIONS OF US RUB, and you have cheap penny ammunition on the "Hurray." laughing

      Quote: aiw
      I'm not talking about the fact that one thing is a top view from a distance of 150m for a submunition that is slowly flying on a parachute, and another ATGM at high speed on a low-flying flight is its target in profile, and the requirements for distance and recognition time are much tougher.
      But he is such a Professor ... an atypical Israeli.

      Explain to me who has a degree in pattern recognition of one of the leading universities in the world, what's the difference in target recognition from above or in profile? wink
      1. 0
        2 September 2017 16: 33
        There is no difference for a black box! laughing lol hi
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    1 September 2017 03: 23
    Americans have long been using these weapons.
  13. 0
    1 September 2017 07: 52
    Let's experience in the Donbass. Dill cover themselves with civilian objects and shoot directly from the courtyards of the houses. Such ammunition will be very popular.
  14. +1
    1 September 2017 20: 54
    Quote: professor
    I love science fiction, but you (in your comment) do not even have this. Today there are no systems capable of this. The company that created the product capable of distinguishing a pedestrian from a car was acquired by Intel for ~ 16 BILLION US dollars, and you have cheap penny ammunition on Hurray.

    What a cheerful, gullible, with a degree. But depicting lethargy.
    I even admit that you specially arrange clowning, and compare the orientation in real-time in space and rather primitive pattern recognition in statics in one projection. Why are you arranging this clowning, you titled ours, is another question.
    But for your information (why you do not know this, being an allegedly titled specialist in this field - this is unscientific fiction), already in the distant 70s of the last century, Soviet-made missile-based computers were capable of performing much more complex operations. In the meantime, new ways of obtaining data are available, and miniaturization has taken a very long step forward.
    So stop your ridiculous pseudoscientific cries and shocks with papers, all this looks strange, to say the least.
    If you hope to get some information in this way about how these signatures are specifically created, this is extremely naive :)
  15. 0
    1 September 2017 20: 58
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Let's talk easier. You want to say that for EVERY bomb, descending by parachute in the search for a target, an infrared video camera is installed? Which determine the type of target: tank, bus, etc. And gives a signal (through a computer installed in EVERY bomb)

    I do not want to say anything about what is installed there, I only notice that the message does not contradict the possibility of creating such systems.
    Naturally, there is no thermal imager in each element: D