Belarusian "Polonaise" entered the top three systems in the world

43
The rocket fire system “Polonez” this year entered the top three in the world according to the Internet video channel “Army of the World”, reports the publication Military-political review.

Belarusian "Polonaise" entered the top three systems in the world


“The Internet video channel has made the world's top 10 multiple rocket launcher systems. Belarusian MLRS in third place after the Chinese AR3 and WS-2D, located on the second and first line, respectively, “- said in a statement.

The top ten also includes MLRS produced by Israel, Russia, the USA, Turkey and other countries.



Edition reference: “Polonaise multiple launch rocket system is designed to destroy openly located and concealed manpower, unarmored and armored military and military special equipment, artillery, missile and anti-aircraft missile systems, aviation "equipment at airfields and other facilities at ranges from 50 km to 200-300 km with high accuracy."
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 August 2017 12: 43
    Rephrase the joke:
    That’s what, comrades, do not curry favor and eat Polonaise
    1. +5
      17 August 2017 12: 44
      The first battery came on duty not at the border with NATO Poland and Lithuania, but near Russia. The Polonaise is firing at 200 km so far and will soon start firing at 300.
      1. +6
        17 August 2017 12: 48
        Apparently hiding from the adversaries.
        1. +7
          17 August 2017 12: 53
          Glad for the Belarusians! good
          The top ten also included MLRS made in Israel, Russia, the USA, Turkey and other countries

          Turkey?!! belay Not expected. And who actually owns this "Internet video channel" and in general, how objective is its assessment?
          1. +5
            17 August 2017 12: 59
            Quote: Shurik70
            In general, how objective is his assessment?

            Judging by the fact that the first places are Chinese, it is very objective. If "Tornado" were in the first place, it would be worth considering the adequacy ...
            Although, of course, throwing everything in one pile is not entirely correct.
      2. +7
        17 August 2017 12: 51
        Tagiryan hi , this is serious? Throw off the link, I don’t possess such info, if the truth ... were stunned there in MO? !!! am
        1. +4
          17 August 2017 12: 55
          I repeat once again - they hide from the adversaries, if necessary, they will transfer them.
        2. +2
          17 August 2017 13: 05
          Hello Alexander hi Here is the link: http: //argumenti.ru/politics/n577/522811
          The latest Belarusian MLRS "Polonaise" deployed on the basis of the 336th artillery brigade in Osipovichi, which is less than 50 km from the border with a fraternal neighbor and more than 300 km from the border with the members of the insidious NATO! So where are the Polonaises actually looking?

          Read more at http://news.eizvestia.com/news_abroad/full/217-be
          lorusskie-ponty-ili-kuda-smotryat-polonezy-zloj-o
          dessit
          1. +19
            17 August 2017 13: 32
            Nonsense, Tagiryan! Osipovichi is my hometown, there used to be an artillery division, my father started as a snotty lieutenant, both Smerch and Hurricanes stood (and now stand), and a howitzer regiment, etc. There is preserved infrastructure (boxes, barracks, etc.), two military camps, so this is a point of constant deployment! After the 3rd year he was there on an internship. The division commander was at one time Marshal of Russia S. Gareev. And in the 50s and 60s Zhukov came to inspect a plaque on the cottage. So, this brother - PPD and no more !!! Phew, relieved, thought our swollen !!!
            1. +2
              17 August 2017 14: 07
              As I understand it, the Polessky training ground is located nearby. Somewhere after all it is necessary to carry out launches in the working order.
              1. +9
                17 August 2017 14: 18
                Yes, not very far. But they can also roll onto the "Dretun", there they shot from Tornadoes and Hurricanes. I already called my classmates (at the same time, I haven’t heard for a long time!), They told and said: Sanya, don’t fart, our brothers are there ... By the way, the Russians go on vacation home, and here they married, families .... good soldier
            2. 0
              17 August 2017 22: 57
              Gareev is not a marshal.
          2. +1
            17 August 2017 23: 12
            Well, finally, Osipovichi is not 50 km away. from an ally. I didn’t count, but about 200-300. Not far from Minsk ... wink
      3. +1
        17 August 2017 12: 55
        Quote: Zibelew
        The first battery came on duty not at the border with NATO Poland and Lithuania, but near Russia.
        China has moved its Strategic Rocket Forces to our borders. Why do you think?
        1. +5
          17 August 2017 13: 00
          So the maximum area of ​​the USA is captured. Their strategic missile forces are not particularly long-range. After all, before they were going to fight the USSR ...
          1. +2
            17 August 2017 13: 15
            Quote: Spade
            So the maximum area of ​​the USA is captured. Their strategic missile forces are not particularly long-range. After all, before they were going to fight with the USSR ..

            And now they are friends. And about range. China is the second power that makes manned launches and is now more netti
        2. 0
          18 August 2017 07: 08
          WHAT FOR?
          We urgently need to "dig up" all ballistic missiles and "dig" in Kamchatka there, they’re closer to America :)
      4. +4
        17 August 2017 13: 11
        in general, the polonaise can later hit 400 km, the Chinese have the maximum range, and the polonaise is essentially a Chinese MLRS.
      5. +6
        17 August 2017 15: 21
        Quote: Zibelew
        The Polonaise is firing at 200 km so far and will soon start firing at 300.

        And we can’t teach our Tornado-S at 200 km. It’s a shame to say, a range of 90-120 km ...
    2. +10
      17 August 2017 12: 49
      To paraphrase the headline, "you will not praise yourself, no one will praise." Probably “Polonaise” entered this imaginary “troika” according to the Belarusian edition. laughing
      1. +7
        17 August 2017 13: 25
        Quote: juborg
        To paraphrase the headline, "you will not praise yourself, no one will praise." Probably “Polonaise” entered this imaginary “troika” according to the Belarusian edition.

        What makes you think that our squabs cannot do this? Pine on our tanks, their handiwork. Belaz are quoted very high. Kamaz so far. Even Dasha Domrocheva put the three-time Olympic champion under the heel of the Great and Horrible, but how did she start? Laughter
    3. +4
      17 August 2017 15: 18
      Quote: Tusv
      That’s what, comrades, do not curry favor and eat Polonaise

      We would finally finish off our Tornado-S, so as not to be ashamed. Russia has always been a leader in the creation of the RZSO. But the brothers are great. Although they support the creed of Russian weapons in this matter.
      But with what fright did the Chinese come out on second place? Vague doubts shake me.
      1. 0
        17 August 2017 15: 33
        Quote: NEXUS
        We would finally finish off our Tornado-S, so as not to be ashamed. Russia has always been a leader in the creation of the RZSO
        .
        I am not ashamed of Russia when our Rockets travel on Belaz belly. I am ashamed of Russia when it does not recognize hi
  2. +3
    17 August 2017 12: 44
    Publication certificate: “Polonez multiple rocket launcher system is designed to destroy openly located and sheltered manpower, unarmored and armored military and military-special equipment, artillery, missile and anti-aircraft missile systems, aviation equipment on home-based airfields and other objects at a distance from 50 km to 200-300 km with high accuracy. "


    Impressive, well done brothers.
    1. +6
      17 August 2017 12: 53
      The remnants of the Soviet military-industrial complex and their achievements ... with the Chinese!
      1. +7
        17 August 2017 12: 56
        Who does anyone work for you from the Chinese, or do you have Chinese?
        1. +8
          17 August 2017 12: 59
          Chassis native, Victor, electronics, too, it seems for the most part, but the rocket ... with the help of Chinese comrades! bully
          1. +2
            17 August 2017 13: 14
            And they do not want to buy them from you?
      2. +3
        17 August 2017 16: 11
        drinks Polonaise for Polonaise hi
      3. 0
        17 August 2017 23: 16
        And with the Ukrainians ??? Who left for Belarus from Dnepropetrovsk ??
    2. +2
      17 August 2017 13: 12
      with what? read who created this MLRS.
      1. +2
        17 August 2017 13: 17
        The fact that at least something is being done - chassis, electronics ...
  3. +5
    17 August 2017 12: 53
    Quote: cniza
    Publication certificate: “Polonez multiple rocket launcher system is designed to destroy openly located and sheltered manpower, unarmored and armored military and military-special equipment, artillery, missile and anti-aircraft missile systems, aviation equipment on home-based airfields and other objects at a distance from 50 km to 200-300 km with high accuracy. "


    Impressive, well done brothers.

    Today, brothers, and tomorrow, orange scumbags. The old man is not there forever, and the West does not sleep, it nurtures the "democrats" slowly ...
    1. +6
      17 August 2017 12: 57
      Maybe, but for this we need to be closer and work with Belarusians, and not be blissful, as with Ukraine.
  4. +9
    17 August 2017 12: 57
    Very strange rating. By what parameters was this list compiled? Without saying anything about Polonaise (a good system), I just don’t understand how Chinese copies could become better than the original? Or was this rating made by the Chinese? Dofiga questions and no answers. hi
    1. +8
      17 August 2017 13: 04
      Quote: major071
      I just don’t understand how Chinese copies could become better than the original?

      Ok, what is the original?
      The Chinese in this area have long overtaken us. Moreover, for all types, starting with turbojet babies, and ending with ultra-long-range monsters.
  5. 0
    17 August 2017 13: 15
    Congratulations, good technique. good
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +2
    17 August 2017 17: 26
    Quote: Spade
    Quote: major071
    I just don’t understand how Chinese copies could become better than the original?

    Ok, what is the original?
    The Chinese in this area have long overtaken us. Moreover, for all types, starting with turbojet babies, and ending with ultra-long-range monsters.

    Overtaken? The overtaking parameter there is only one: range. We do not produce systems of this range not because we cannot, but because accuracy is becoming unacceptable. The Chinese have problems creating modern OTRK, which they are trying to solve by increasing the range of multiple launch rocket systems for use in scenarios similar to the use of OTRK.
    1. 0
      19 August 2017 16: 54
      But we don’t need further and we are building for the defense of the system and not for flooding, the main thing will fly to the enemy’s rear
  8. 0
    17 August 2017 18: 38
    Belarusians are great, but if you look at the video, the Chinese are at 10,2,, 1 places .... they bargained for technologies
  9. 0
    18 August 2017 10: 43
    The author forgot to mention that the rating was compiled by the Army of the World video blogger.
  10. +1
    18 August 2017 17: 41
    Quote: Spade
    Quote: Shurik70
    In general, how objective is his assessment?

    Judging by the fact that the first places are Chinese, it is very objective. If "Tornado" were in the first place, it would be worth considering the adequacy ...
    Although, of course, throwing everything in one pile is not entirely correct.

    A tornado is a good system, but it loses to the Chinese in firing range, ours has a range of only 75 km.
    1. 0
      19 August 2017 16: 56
      But the zone of complete destruction is larger