Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO

76
The Romanian armed forces today cannot boast of high combat capability, with the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, Bucharest successfully buried a fairly powerful defense industry and left the troops without a modern weapons, says the material channel RT.



In the USSR, Romania was publicly called the “main dissident.” Bucharest was flirting with nationalism and trying to balance between Moscow and the West. At the same time, on the basis of Soviet technology, a developed defense complex appeared in Romania.

“Now the army is experiencing serious equipment problems: still outdated analogues of Soviet equipment are still in service. The country's defense budget is currently just over $ 2 billion (according to this indicator, Bucharest is in the 62-m place in the world), ”the publication says.

About 177 thousand people serve in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Romania.

The Romanian Armed Forces include ground, naval and air force. All types are characterized by weak financing and insufficient technical equipment. Land forces are considered the most combat-ready. Since the time when the country joined NATO (1994), the USA, Switzerland, Germany, France, Spain and Israel began to supply it with armored vehicles.

The MiG-23 and MiG-29 fighters, which until now were considered modern in Romania, were removed from service because of the lack of spare parts and money to acquire them. The Romanian Air Force is based on the Soviet 3-generation fighters of the MiG-21, which were decommissioned in the Russian Federation and other countries.

The Romanian Navy includes 3 frigates, 7 corvettes, 5 minesweepers, 6 rocket boats and 20 patrol vessels. The fleet also has two naval bases, an 4 logistics and logistics center and a technical support center.
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    14 July 2017 10: 27
    Where did you see the “gypsy army"? How where? In it itself, in Romania ..
    1. +19
      14 July 2017 10: 30
      "Gypsies roam a noisy crowd in Bessarabia ...!" - You listened to the broadcast about the military maneuvers of the Romanian army laughing
      1. +3
        14 July 2017 10: 35
        I thought they had already soviet things there for a long time fused to the races ... wink
        1. +3
          14 July 2017 10: 55
          NATO just doesn’t use them correctly .... Romanians need to be used as fortune tellers wassat.... the soldiers of them are NO, but the looters of wow! They can give anyone a head start ... laughing
          1. +6
            14 July 2017 10: 58
            In 1942, the Romanians "mistreated" in the Kuban. Old people remember this with horror, they were worse than the Nazis ..
            Quote: Black
            NATO just doesn’t use them correctly .... Romanians need to be used as fortune tellers wassat.... the soldiers of them are NO, but the looters of wow! They can give anyone a head start ... laughing
            1. +5
              14 July 2017 11: 07
              Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO

              It seemed: "The Romanian army is one of the most combat-ready in NATO" belay
              Quote: 210ox
              worse than the Nazis were ..

              The less cowardly and worthless the fighter, the better the punisher from him; they will avenge normal people for their inferiority. am
          2. +2
            14 July 2017 10: 59
            hi
            Quote: Black
            the soldiers of them are NO, but the looters of wow! They can give anyone a head start ...

            So what kind of wasabi do the Romanians of NATO need. And I’m racking my brains - because everything they can is stolen. lol
      2. 0
        14 July 2017 13: 29
        “With the collapse of the Warsaw Treaty Organization, Bucharest safely buried a fairly powerful defense industry”
        Did Romania enter the Warsaw Pact? Mistake
        1. +1
          14 July 2017 17: 19
          Didn’t you come in?
        2. 0
          14 July 2017 19: 35
          Kanesh came in ...
      3. 0
        14 July 2017 16: 17
        Bessarabia is Odessa region. And here is what Kirkorov-Romanian is for sure
      4. +1
        15 July 2017 04: 12
        And in what times and times of war was she combat ready? In the First, they barely pulled it out, in the Second, they fought well near Stalingrad, thanks!
    2. +17
      14 July 2017 10: 58
      Dmitry you are wrong
  2. +22
    14 July 2017 10: 28
    Romanians? Why would the gypsies have an army? Vlad Dracula will protect ...
    1. +6
      14 July 2017 10: 54
      Quote: Anarchist
      Why would the gypsies have an army? Vlad Dracula will protect ...

      Vladik will most likely serve as a generator of free electricity, because from what is happening now in Romania, he should spin in his grave like a decent dynamo ...
  3. +1
    14 July 2017 10: 28
    I would take the British there too. Especially the fleet of Her Majesty.
    1. +1
      14 July 2017 10: 43
      Quote: RESEARCHER
      I would take the British there too. Especially the fleet of Her Majesty.

      Here the Navy is just very strong, EMNIP, the fourth in NATO after the Americans, the Turks and the Greeks. Plus, nuclear weapons
    2. BVS
      0
      14 July 2017 10: 47
      I was not dismissively writing about Her Majesty's fleet. After all, some analysts say the following:
      1 location - US Navy
      2 place - Her Majesty's fleet
      3 Place - Japan's Self-Defense Forces
      4 location - Navy People's Liberation Army of China
      5 place - Indian Navy
      6 location - Navy of the Russian Federation
      1. +8
        14 July 2017 10: 57
        And I write for three reasons.
        1. The degree of degradation rolls over (both in historical and moral aspects).
        2. Readiness and morale are a big question.
        3. I DO NOT BELIEVE THESE RATINGS. These ratings are based on the "38 parrots" system. Namely, if you always count in parrots, you will certainly get more.
        Yes, and even if I’m wrong, I’ll write badly about Great Britain. I do not perceive them as a civilization.
        1. +10
          14 July 2017 11: 29
          Plus to you! These ratings are based on the presence of aircraft carriers and universal landing ships (light aircraft carriers). Therefore, Britain and Japan are so high in the ranking, and India too.
          And the fact that the British can put a couple of destroyers in and one submarine is of little interest to anyone. Because of this, by the way, there were already scandals in the British Parliament.
          1. +2
            14 July 2017 11: 54
            Thank you for your support and a brilliant understanding of the features, accuracy and subtleties of the Russian language. The article that is commented here is called: Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO. Keyword "problematic", not about Romanians. There, more than half of the NATO armies fits this word. And my comment was received as if I wrote about the obvious weakness of the UK fleet. I wrote about his PROBLEMS.
            1. +1
              14 July 2017 12: 49
              Quote: RESEARCHER
              The key word is "problematic", not about Romanians

              Actually, it’s about the Romanians. The very phrase “Romanian army”, in itself, causes a smile. Both in historical and in modern presentation. lol
              1. +1
                14 July 2017 13: 50
                I bet with you. For NATO, it is not the Romanian army that is interesting, but Romania as the territory for the deployment of missile defense. And for the United States, this is a potential buyer of American weapons. And what is there to procrastinate about the power of the Romanian army.
                1. 0
                  14 July 2017 14: 06
                  Quote: RESEARCHER
                  I bet you

                  Why argue, and what? The question in the article is not about the territory of Romania as a NATO bridgehead, but as far as I understand, it is about the problematic Romanian army.
            2. +1
              14 July 2017 13: 42
              There are all the armies in this state, more or less French, English and German. And the rest are even weaker than in the DPR and LPR in the quantity and quality of equipment.
          2. +1
            15 July 2017 19: 14
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            Plus to you! These ratings are based on the presence of aircraft carriers and universal landing ships (light aircraft carriers). Therefore, Britain and Japan are so high in the ranking, and India too.
            And the fact that the British can put a couple of destroyers in and one submarine is of little interest to anyone. Because of this, by the way, there were already scandals in the British Parliament.

            The British Navy takes the 2-th place in terms of total tonnage, and tasks to be solved, I think the rating is correct ....
        2. BVS
          +1
          14 July 2017 13: 55
          “Well, even if I’m not right, then I’ll write badly about Great Britain. I don’t perceive them as a civilization.”
          This is chauvinism.
          1. 0
            14 July 2017 17: 35
            If you do not like my attitude to the state, whose centuries-old goal is the destruction of my people, then I advise you to listen to the Beatles, read Shakespeare and re-study Newton’s laws. This raises the ratings of the UK. And I will remain in my opinion.
            1. +1
              15 July 2017 19: 19
              Quote: RESEARCHER
              If you do not like my attitude to the state, whose centuries-old goal is the destruction of my people, then I advise you to listen to the Beatles, read Shakespeare and re-study Newton’s laws. This raises the ratings of the UK. And I will remain in my opinion.

              The article is actually about the Romanian Army ....
              He knew well English (including Old English), would love to read Shakespeare in the original source ...
              Why do you need to visit this site, the armed forces of foreign states are often discussed here, you will read an article about them and be nervous ....
              For a long time, for example, I have been interested in the IDF and the British Army, this does not mean that I am an enemy of the Russian Federation ....
    3. +1
      15 July 2017 19: 10
      Quote: RESEARCHER
      I would take the British there too. Especially the fleet of Her Majesty.

      You can also attribute the American one there, only the British (the most efficient in Europe) and American, they will not become worse than the Russian ...
  4. +12
    14 July 2017 10: 35
    Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO

    NATO! you are responsible for those whom you tamed ... wink
  5. +5
    14 July 2017 10: 38
    Well what are you! This is the most victorious army: with Hitler to Stalingrad and with Stalin to Vienna and Prague! Tin and not the army.
  6. +4
    14 July 2017 10: 41
    Well, Romanian has always been a problem.
  7. +7
    14 July 2017 10: 43
    What is characteristic
    As for the Navy, it includes 3 frigates, 7 corvettes, 5 mine minesweepers, 6 missile boats and 20 patrol vessels. Romania also has two naval bases, four logistics facilities and a technical support center.
    all the most valuable fit in two sentences. Yes
  8. +2
    14 July 2017 10: 44
    Quote: 210ox
    Where did you see the “gypsy army"? How where? In it itself, in Romania ..

    -------------------------
    By the way, the Gypsies have a very strict hierarchy and there are the initial beginnings of subordination. I saw how the Gypsy team divided the proceeds for the commissioned ferrous metal and how much each was supposed to. But at the same time, an adult young man came up to me in the store and asked me to choose “Cahors” on the wine counter, he simply could not read at all. I think the Romanian army presents a similar sight. And at the same time, Romanians are considered one of the most beautiful women in Europe and this is true.
    1. +1
      14 July 2017 10: 56
      [media = http: // https: //youtu.be/rUHm-E1ny28? t = 74] e
      what is considered to be? like Slavs were still recourse
    2. +1
      14 July 2017 11: 02
      What does the woman have to do ????))
      1. +1
        14 July 2017 14: 55
        And what does the Romanian army have to do with it. Here, after all, Military Review
        1. +1
          14 July 2017 14: 58
          Full hussar. Everything in topic
    3. +1
      14 July 2017 11: 03
      I'm afraid even an organized gang remains a gang in which at the very first signs of an approaching kirdyk it runs up.

      PS
      “Romanian dogs squealed out of the gateway. They capitulated with their masters and were mortally afraid of the Red Army. It was enough to clap on the holster so that the huge dog rushed off wherever eyes look ”Boris Slutsky. Notes on the war. Poems and ballads
  9. +3
    14 July 2017 10: 50
    Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO

    If only the Romanian army were problematic, then NATO would be happy. As a result, they scored so many problematic that normal commanders would have already moved off the roof. But the main thing here is as close to the borders of Russia as possible. But these underdeveloped people cannot understand that they are a bargaining chip.
  10. +5
    14 July 2017 10: 53
    The Romanian army is the strongest in the world! With Hitler came to Moscow, and with Stalin - to Berlin
    1. +1
      14 July 2017 11: 02
      Volodya, hello! hi
      Quote: pvv113
      The Romanian army is the strongest in the world! With Hitler came to Moscow, and with Stalin - to Berlin

      Reinforced concrete argument! good In the 404th they will not let you in now, for what you said about the Romanians. Will you survive? wink
      1. +2
        14 July 2017 11: 04
        Hello Pasha! I’m chewing something laughing
        1. +1
          14 July 2017 11: 06
          I, in general, did not doubt you. wink
      2. +2
        14 July 2017 11: 06
        By the status of the most powerful army, the 404th so far claims only Europe
    2. +3
      14 July 2017 11: 08
      Quote: pvv113
      The Romanian army is the strongest in the world!

      My grandfather was a prisoner. I climbed into a hot plane, and took out a bag of bread from there. So Romania asked him for this bread. And the German guard, from lightly wounded, drove them ... laughing laughing Here, says, Ivan is the master feel feel
    3. +2
      14 July 2017 15: 04
      Normal army. He just wants to eat and go home
    4. 0
      14 July 2017 15: 27
      Are you so humorous? Sparklingly. Almost like Zadornov. But the theme of the photo is not funny. Unhappy people in fear for their lives. Here is the same picture for you. Find the difference.
      1. +1
        14 July 2017 18: 12
        The difference is very significant. When they take our prisoners - this is bad, and when ours - good.
        1. 0
          14 July 2017 18: 55
          I explain the difference. Most Romanian prisoners returned home. Our prisoners almost all died, especially the 1941 prisoners. It is a pity that they themselves did not understand this difference.
          1. +1
            14 July 2017 19: 03
            Pity the unfortunate army of Paulus in Stalingrad. And the prisoners of the Bandera who regretted these, as you say, the unfortunate with the prisoners did not stand on ceremony
          2. +1
            14 July 2017 20: 06
            Are you depressed about what you wrote about? When was it different? But the Russians do not spare each other.
            1. +1
              15 July 2017 19: 23
              Quote: Love is
              But the Russians do not spare each other.

              Would love, still would be RI ...
              In no country there are so many people who hate their people and state, this can be seen even in the comments from the site ...
              1. +1
                15 July 2017 20: 09
                I agree with you. Hard trials await us again. An example is the Jewish people. Rejected and crucified God. Holy Russia was not because it conquered all. And she won because she was a saint. Clean. Until materialism came. Window to Europe.
      2. 0
        14 July 2017 19: 06
        I love humor very much but you made me very angry
        1. +1
          14 July 2017 21: 42
          than, we, comrade, made you angry that you are wearing epaulettes, and I threw them away after the 90th
  11. +3
    14 July 2017 10: 59
    I remember one Russian general who said when he heard that Romania entered the war.
    G: Two divisions.
    S (lash): But you didn’t recognize which side!
    G: In any case, I will need two divisions. To defend Romania or to defeat its army.
    1. +1
      14 July 2017 18: 15
      This is not exactly about the First World phrase was. Indeed, from the entry of Romania into the war on the side of Russia, Russia only lost, as it soon had to lengthen the front and take on supplies the Romanian divisions defeated by the Germans.
      1. 0
        14 July 2017 20: 10
        And to keep 1/3 of the remaining from the territory of the country (Romania).
        those. actually a joke is only confirmed
  12. +6
    14 July 2017 11: 01
    Romanian army is one of the most problematic in NATO

    Well, thank God that these are now the problems of NATO, and not Russia, and NATO Romania is needed only under the platform for missile defense and as cannon fodder. Yes
    1. 0
      14 July 2017 21: 52
      here it is, gud, the next year I’ll take a ticket to Ust-Kachka - I’ll cure my nerves, and the corephans said - “they’ll cut off my legs”
  13. 0
    14 July 2017 11: 07
    Are there any other armies besides mattresses in NATO?)
    1. 0
      14 July 2017 15: 12
      I don’t know the army. But the generals are full
      1. +2
        14 July 2017 15: 25
        We have generals on every couch ...)
        1. 0
          14 July 2017 21: 55
          Boys, and there are, even the "Red Star" awarded, although we are not loyal
      2. 0
        14 July 2017 21: 46
        The army is sacred, if you still thought what to do with entim
  14. +1
    14 July 2017 11: 09
    Romanians need to do everything for Ukraine to join NATO. Then they will no longer be the most problematic army ... smile
    1. +1
      14 July 2017 13: 38
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Romanians need to do everything for Ukraine to join NATO. Then they will no longer be the most problematic army ... smile

      So Ukraine is in fourth place in the most powerful army in Europe. And then what will Romania do?
  15. 0
    14 July 2017 11: 18
    Gypsies traditionally drive horses (crossed out) equipment into the forest?
    1. 0
      14 July 2017 19: 11
      To the bazaar. They sell black horses (equipment)
      1. +1
        14 July 2017 21: 38
        I was sitting, I’m somehow with the head of the administration, they accused me of reselling the horses from Chechnya, each 100 pieces of gold
  16. +2
    14 July 2017 16: 09
    the last 3 years, romanians in Germany have come to shoponez, the men are all without a trace at the post office, women cleaners.
  17. 0
    14 July 2017 21: 33
    well, take from the madirs, if their Germans do not respect
  18. 0
    15 July 2017 09: 55
    I will say more of their army of gypsies and in Sweden creates a bunch of problems.
  19. 0
    15 July 2017 10: 53
    During the war, the Germans said that the Romanian tanks had five gears - one forward and four back. On the one hand, a bad ally is better than a good enemy, and on the other, a bad ally of a strong enemy is better. This is about rumunest.