The trump card is again in the sleeve of the United States. Consequences of the "de-escalation memorandum", or the test for "softness"
Despite the very productive outcome of the first extended meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, as well as between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the position of the current US administration on key geo-strategic issues remains almost unchanged. Naturally, it would be naive to assume that a two-hour meeting at the Hamburg exhibition center, within the framework of the G20 summit, is capable of bringing progress in the relations between the two superpowers, which have diametrically opposed visions of the geopolitical structure of the world in the 21st century. In particular, during his visit to Warsaw, 6 on June 2017, the head of the White House decided not to refrain from the classic US aggressively destructive rhetoric towards Russia, and accused Moscow of “destabilizing the situation” in the “independent”. Syrian government forces and the LDNR People’s Militia Corps were classified as “hostile regimes”, posing a threat to the “democratic cell” of the world. Therefore, it is hardly worth expecting any “gaps”. Neither the number of handshakes between the leaders of the two leading powers, nor the degree of “theatricality” and hypocrisy, performed by the American side on the margins of the G20 summit, will affect the future alignment.
What is even more interesting, two days before the "promising" meeting in Hamburg, on July 5, 2017, US Secretary of State R. Tillerson unexpectedly announced that the American administration was considering the possibility of jointly forming unmanned zones in the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic with the Russian Aerospace Forces. With a high degree of probability, Tillerson's statement is a prepared speech, the purpose of which may be an attempt to quickly "switch" Moscow's attention to the distribution and consolidation of airspace over the Syrian theater of operations between the parties to the conflict (it is logical that a detailed "debriefing" was on the G20 agenda ). Obviously, the end result of the US Secretary of State's statement was to ensure the complete security of the US ILC and MTR units, as well as the "moderate opposition" forces from possible missileaviation strikes from the tactical aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, after all, the warning about the "take on escort" of all the aircraft of the OVS of the coalition along the Euphrates River by Russian air defense forces forced the Pentagon to significantly reduce the number of sorties, and also think three times before launching AIM-9X at Syrian fighters ...
At the same time, it is understood in Washington that the division of the airspace of Syria with the united coalition air forces to Moscow is absolutely disadvantageous, because sooner or later the tactical “boilers” around the ISIS enclaves will narrow down and the caliphate on the territory of the SAR will be suppressed, after which the main the American-backed Syrian opposition in the person of the VTS and other militant formations will become the enemy of the CAA and the VKS of Russia. And this means that Russia, in order to maintain its presence in Syria and regional influence in the Middle East, has yet to participate in a direct clash with militants supported by the Americans, and possibly the US Air Force. From the need to cover the Syrian army from the Western coalition to our air defenses, does not "wriggle out", otherwise the main ally of Russia will be methodically and efficiently destroyed by Tomahawks and deck aircraft of the US Navy, after which we can be politely (or maybe not quite) , ask to leave the territory of Syria, relying on the "legitimized democratic government", consisting of opposition fighters.
Now it is quite clear that the “division” of the airspace on American terms is the final and irreversible trampling of Moscow’s military-strategic interests in the Middle East into the mud, and hardly anyone would agree to such an insane step. There is a “fable” by Tillerson on the joint establishment of no-fly zones over Syria and an additional sub-goal, consisting in checking the Russian departments for the so-called “foreign policy” softness. Take a look, after the plans sounded by R. Tillerson on July 5, official Washington took a kind of pause and “shut up”. Our Foreign Ministry immediately sent to the United States to provide more detailed data on the scheme proposed by Tillerson, and then also sent the Russian “formula” of the settlement. And what about Washington? And Washington continued to be silent, pulling out the information “bricks” of our settlement strategy in Syria from our Foreign Ministry and other departments! A very indicative situation, in which Moscow, unfortunately, is again positioning itself as an interested and driven side, partially “revealing the cards” to our main opponent. No good, as a rule, it can not lead.
The Americans clearly continue to follow their previously developed algorithm for gradually establishing control over the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic, with minor amendments to the rapidly changing operational-tactical situation. At the same time, a rather large stakes are being made on the mixed “bridgehead” erected in the Syrian At-Tanf, represented by the Marine Corps, the Special Operations Forces of the USA and the VTS opposition cell. In one of our works, we have already considered the deployment targets of M142 “HIMARS” high-precision multiple-launch rocket systems in the area, capable of firing 227-mm unguided rockets M26A1 / A2, corrected by M / XM30 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / M / XM140 / / / / / / / / / / / / / /. MGM-164 / 300B "ATACMS Block IA / IIA" tactical ballistic missiles with a range of XNUMX km. And the point here is not in the IG. “HIMARSy” are intended exclusively for pinpoint massive strikes on the units of the Syrian army immediately after the ISIS “leaves the game” and the VTS will face the Syrian armed forces face to face.
At the moment, the combat potential of the “coalition assault fist” under At-Tanf is not yet strong enough to resist the entire Syrian Arab Army, supported by our videoconferencing forces, but the situation can change dramatically in a few months. In particular, at the end of the G20 summit, Russian, American and Jordanian experts in Amman had agreed on a so-called “de-escalation memorandum”, which extends to the south-western parts of the ATS - Essaouida, Dera'a and Quneitra. The entry into force of the "truce" is expected in 00: 00 9 July. A quite adequate question arises: what kind of truce can we talk about when in the area of Tafas, Tasila, and what's the big deal, is ISIL militants quietly operating in most parts of the Golan Heights? The Israel Defense Forces do not contribute to the "settling" of the threat of the caliphate, but only delivering blows at Syrian units in response to random artillery shells that have just flown in, which only aggravates the situation. What then is the purpose of this memorandum? We look at the map of the southwestern regions of Syria.
It is clearly seen here that, in addition to the IG enclave in the southern part of the Golan Heights, the vast 115-kilometer stretch from the cities of Samj and Bosra bordering Jordan to the city of Erna (northeast of the Golan Heights) is controlled by Syrian opposition forces that hold the Syrian-Jordan section of the border. This grouping of opposition forces is separated about the central southern group of SDS by the tactical "horn" of government troops, passing from the northern border of the governorate of Essaweida to the southern borders of the governorate of Damascus. This moment seriously impedes the operational and tactical capabilities of opposition forces before a future clash with Syrian government forces, even taking into account the fact that groups in the At-Tanfa and Deraa areas can act together (exchanging necessary military formations and material and technical support) due to the presence of friendly Jordanian boundaries.
Washington understands that the elimination of the above tactical "horns" of the CAA will require an offensive operation in the area of the "Um Hartein isthmus" controlled by the Syrian army. The width of the "isthmus" from the town of Um Hartein BC Al-Hukuf reaches 20 km, for the breakthrough of which will require significant forces of the VTS, supported by units of the American army; because this section, which also has a military airbase, is littered with the most powerful fortifications and CAA strongholds. So they needed the above-described memorandum on de-escalating the “triangle” of “Suwayda-Deraa-Kuneitra”. It’s already known by July 9 evening that one thing will be clear about how long the operational silence will last in this sector: during this pseudo-surrogation, the States will have time to maximize the use of modern armed armaments in two separate southern groups of the Syrian opposition Tanfu to the big war.
As for the large-scale conflict between the SAA and the so-called "democratic forces", which may "flare up" immediately after IS leaves the "Big Game", taking into account the above memorandum, a very unpleasant situation is developing. In the very first days of clashes, the SDF, with the support of those very American "HIMARS", will be able to crush the defense of the "isthmus" of Um Hartein "in a matter of days, and if at this stage Moscow again gives weakness, refraining from fully covering the Syrian army from the tactical aviation of Western coalition, then we will have to contemplate on the pages of all news departments "Suweid cauldron", in which the thousands-strong grouping of the Southern Front of the Syrian Armed Forces, which will be shamelessly finished off by Hel Haavir from the air, is at risk.
At the moment, there are many indirect signs indicating the inevitability of a direct clash between the Russian contingent and the US Armed Forces in the SAR. The priority operational areas in which the Western coalition with the VTS plans to begin the process of "shifting" the Syrian army are also clearly visible. It remains only to stop blithely flirting with Washington, going on about all sorts of cleverly planned memoranda and proposals for the creation of fly-by zones, which quite unexpectedly for everyone can turn for the US Air Force into completely “flyable” frontiers for rocket launches on our and Syrian military infrastructure.
Information sources:
https://ria.ru/syria/20170707/1498091656.html
https://ria.ru/syria/20170707/1498096377.html
https://ria.ru/syria/20170706/1497991297.html
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/himars/himars.shtml
http://zzaharr.livejournal.com/128053.html
Information