Tu-95MS "ogofeshat"

55
According to the online editionNews", The company" Gefest and T "with the support of the Ministry of Defense is developing a special computing subsystem of SVP, which will allow strategic rocket carriers Tu-95MS "Bear" receive in real time from ground positions the coordinates of the targets and immediately destroy them with a missile strike.



Currently, the coordinates of the targets are laid down in the memory of the rockets at the aerodrome even before the rocket carrier’s takeoff. The new system will work as follows. From the ground, using a special terminal, transmit the coordinates of the target on the plane. The onboard SVP system calculates all the parameters and lays down the flight mission in the head of the missile guidance. Its launch carries the crew of the aircraft.

As explained in the military department, the development of the SVP for the Tu-95MS was carried out by Hephaestus and T as part of the initiative work. Recently, she entered the long-term development plan of the Russian far aviation.

Currently, the SVP is part of the equipment of the Russian Su-24М front-line bombers, the Su-33 carrier-based fighters, and Tu-22М3 long-range bombers. In the army, the renewed planes are called "fires." They demonstrated their unique capabilities in the framework of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Force in Syria. The SVP makes it possible to eliminate terrorist objects with unguided high-explosive bombs with an accuracy that is not inferior to guided missiles. On the ground, targets are discovered by special operations forces. On the electronic map, they indicate the point to be hit, as well as the target parameters, after which the information is transmitted on board the aircraft.

As an independent military expert, Anton Lavrov, believes, the widespread opinion about the SVP as a normal sight is wrong, because in fact it is a network-centric automated control system that provides for the unification of all participants into a single information space.

At present, Russian VKS use cruise missiles only for previously detected targets. The SVP seriously increases the capabilities of the Russian military aviation in search and destruction of targets in real time. Tu-95MS with SVP can be in the air up to 30 hours and conduct combat patrols. At any time, his crew, at the request of the ground forces, will deliver high-precision strikes at a distance of up to 1,5 thousand km.


In his opinion, the Tu-95MS with SVPs capable of operating at a considerable distance from home airfields will significantly expand the range of operations, including special operations raids.

The Tu-95MS is an updated version of the Soviet strategic bomber Tu-95, which was put into service at the end of the 1950s. The car received a new wing, as well as more economical turboprop engines NK-12MP. The first flight of the MC made in 1979 year. And two years later their serial production began.

Tu-95MS "ogofeshat"


Before 1992, about a hundred updated strategic missile carriers were launched. At present, the 60 Tu-95MS is in service with the VKS of Russia. The flight range of the Bear without refueling in the air is more than 10 thousand km. The machine’s ammunition is eight X-555 or X-101 cruise missiles.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    28 June 2017 09: 14
    nothing is sorry for our western and middle eastern partners
    1. +1
      28 June 2017 11: 26
      Quote: Tolstoevsky
      and middle eastern partners

      maybe "burned"?
  2. +4
    28 June 2017 09: 23
    Handsome Misha =)
  3. 0
    28 June 2017 09: 27
    another question: are we ready for such costs? for the flight hour of 95th is not cheap, but the Kyrgyz Republic is not worth a penny ...
    1. +3
      28 June 2017 09: 41
      Quote: tchoni
      another question: are we ready for such costs?

      well yes. we assume. country security by drum. an adult, isn’t everything calculated? or only in the internet "specialists" sit on all issues? you consider your budget
    2. +9
      28 June 2017 09: 42
      1 hour of operation of the Tu-95 times 2 times less than that of the TU-22M3. Rocket 55 and 555 we have left in reserve more than 2000 pieces. Barmaley can arrange such a weakness%)))) and even with conventional landmines - you can hang FABs in clusters of it ... Watch the video on the network how the B-52 pours .... So the teddy bear can.
      By the way, if you just heard how he "bass" in the sky, then you can never confuse him with any plane ...
      1. 0
        28 June 2017 10: 08
        An-22 also bass. Although, the NK-12 engines will not bash in another way.
        1. 0
          28 June 2017 18: 44
          Quote: samoletil18
          An-22 also bass. Although, the NK-12 engines will not bash in another way.

          on AN 22 there is Nk 12 MA, the difference with 12MP is in the body kit of the engine, and on AN 22 there are longer screws, for lifting capacity, the Tu 95 is shorter, it seems 70cm, the sounds are different in speed
          1. +7
            29 June 2017 00: 39
            The reason for the difference in power and sound (with authentic control systems) lies not in the length of the blade, but in the design of the screw. On the An-22 there is a coaxial four-blade twin propeller AB-90. On the “club-footed” (Tu-95) -AV-60, four-bladed feathering screw of opposite rotation with variable pitch and hydrocentrifugal rotation mechanism of the blades with the blades in the vane position and at an intermediate angle stop.
            Simply put, the feathering angle of the blade affects the power of the aircraft SU, respectively, on the "clubfoot roar."

            AB-60


            AB-90
            1. +1
              30 June 2017 12: 57
              Quote: Solomon Kane
              The reason for the difference in power and sound (with authentic control systems) lies not in the length of the blade, but in the design of the screw. On the An-22 there is a coaxial four-blade twin propeller AB-90. On the “club-footed” (Tu-95) -AV-60, four-bladed feathering screw of opposite rotation with variable pitch and hydrocentrifugal rotation mechanism of the blades with the blades in the vane position and at an intermediate angle stop.
              Simply put, the feathering angle of the blade affects the power of the aircraft SU, respectively, on the "clubfoot roar."

              AB-60

              AB-90

              only screws with TU 95 were repaired in our workshop, so I don’t say that the engines are the same
              1. +5
                30 June 2017 13: 33
                Was the repair complex, along with the bushings? In which city can they intersect?
                1. 0
                  30 June 2017 14: 46
                  Quote: Solomon Kane
                  Was the repair complex, along with the bushings? In which city can they intersect?

                  Ukraine Konotop, we have been repairing NK 12 engines since the beginning of their production, I was a mechanic assembler of the NK12 engine, Assembled KMA, KSA, TS drive, compressor column, and central gearbox, YES and before that it was in / part21653
                  1. +5
                    30 June 2017 16: 26
                    Clear. And I'm in OKB-150, where these screws AB-60 and AV-90 were developed and regulators for them .....
                    1. 0
                      30 June 2017 17: 50
                      Quote: Solomon Kane
                      Clear. And I'm in OKB-150, where these screws AB-60 and AV-90 were developed and regulators for them .....

                      maybe only our business travelers dropped in on you, I just went to Uzen, Kiev, Nikolaev
                      1. +5
                        30 June 2017 23: 04
                        It’s still nice to meet a like-minded person, or rather a colleague from far away.
      2. FID
        +1
        28 June 2017 10: 17
        Quote: Gogia
        Watch the video on the network as the B-52 pours .... So the teddy bear can.

        Where did you read (or find out, or something else ...) that the Tu-95MS can be used as a free-fall? Do not share the secret?
        1. +2
          28 June 2017 11: 32
          Yes, and 6 missiles, not 8, before it was possible to hang 16 and then the agreement was signed by the START and the suspension systems were removed from the wing. The author before writing an article even went to Wikipedia or something ...
          1. 0
            28 June 2017 13: 38
            Quote: mixei
            Yes, and 6 missiles, not 8,

            6 missiles of the type X-55 (X-555). Eight X-101 (X-102) on modified aircraft on external sling. Just look on the Internet for fresh photos of these aircraft
      3. +4
        28 June 2017 11: 50
        Quote: Gogia
        Barmaley can arrange such a weakness%)))) and with conventional landmines - you can hang fabs in clusters in it ...

        1. Tu-95MS strategic missile carrier;
        2. In service, he has only strategic cruise missiles;
        Now tell me: what kind of strategic goals do these “barmaley” have for these aircraft? A couple of times the opponents were shown more serious possibilities of such a bundle of weapons, and this can calm down. Frontline aviation works well with the proposed system - this is its topic.
        But the use of such equipment for strategists is good for accelerating preparation for a combat mission, at least one technological operation, but crashes. And the ability to change flight information for missiles in flight due to various circumstances is an old dream. Plus, in this form, you can direct missiles at the carrier formations of a potential enemy, even during their movement. This also expands the combat potential of such aircraft and is expensive.
        Something like that.
        1. +1
          28 June 2017 12: 38
          I agree. But this is the second stage of the process. And it is more relevant for ground-based systems like MLRS with a range of about 150 km and even MSTA - up to 30 km or more, helicopters and SU-34 ... But first, ask the author. and who will produce these target coordinates? And immediately comes .. STUPOR. We do not have simple Combat Information Systems that carry out the function of such target designation, although they were supposed to appear in 2010 ... In addition to detecting targets, determining coordinates and transmitting information in real time, you need to identify the target .. We need to confirm. that it’s a combat goal, to determine the significance, to eliminate the error ... It’s impossible to include the operator in the chain, the real-time criterion will not be fulfilled, automatic analyzers - to develop for a long time and errors are possible ... It’s necessary to put the operator, or rather the officer conducting the operation with the functions of taking responsibility solutions and complete management ....
          Now the question is for the author and those sheep who promote such harmful ideas: why sculpt such a system on the strategist if you, did not, make such bundles on earth for simple systems? We have nothing of the sort. Alas, no ... Instead, suicide bombers are scouts and spotters of fire. Will they transmit the coordinates of TU-95? When will such systems be made using information from UAVs, TU-214R reconnaissance aircraft and others? You failed to portray idiotic attempts to portray something similar in the systems of ESU TK "Constellation" and ASU "Andromnda-D". Why build troop control systems if you don’t know where the enemy is and which one. What a foolish person automates the second without automating the first, without arranging the collection of information and its processing. Result: our army does not know how to wage a modern war using OSV. And, judging by such articles, this will have to wait a long time !!!
          1. +1
            28 June 2017 13: 01
            And now the question for everyone?
            What then is being worked out on our teachings and why are they being held?
            I do not want to answer, they can ban for obscene language ....
            All our teachings are window dressing and complete nonsense, and Syria has shown it. First, train to find the enemy, and then how to destroy it. We have no first ....
            1. +1
              28 June 2017 16: 51
              Okko, you are 80% right unfortunately, but about the show, there is generally 100% to the point. I’m constantly writing about it myself
          2. +1
            29 June 2017 16: 56
            And you are not yet in the General Staff? This is an omission ...
  4. +4
    28 June 2017 09: 28
    The "old man" will also serve, even as it will. The main thing - he really does not like all of our "friends and partners." The Britons already believe that the Russians will follow their largest aircraft carrier. They will, of course, through the scope.
    1. +1
      28 June 2017 09: 44
      Quote: Old military instructor
      The Britons already believe that the Russians will follow their largest aircraft carrier

      but who needs this floating target. just "scare" some Papuans
      1. +1
        28 June 2017 11: 48
        Bullshit ... he (Tu-95) doesn’t have such a goal to scare someone, the only task is to arrive in a given square without entering the enemy’s air defense strike zone, launch missiles, and the target can be located beyond 2000 and 3000 km, but this is another conversation.
  5. +5
    28 June 2017 09: 31
    The “oldies” still comb the enemies. No wonder they called them "bears". He is still a beast in nature, he is not afraid of anyone.
    In vain does not kill anyone.
    1. +1
      28 June 2017 10: 49
      only in winter paw sucks
      1. 0
        28 June 2017 21: 06
        Quote: Walanin
        only in winter paw sucks


        And what is this said to? Paw, you know, sucks. He warms his nose, actually. Because the temperature balance of the body must be observed during hibernation. However, instinct. I didn’t climb into Wikipedia, purely guess. hi
  6. +4
    28 June 2017 09: 31
    chasing terrorists or tracking individual objects online is by no means the function of that 95, it is not in vain that he was called a strategic one — a cruise missile strike with a nuclear warhead — that’s his “hobbyhorse” and not bombers
    1. +3
      28 June 2017 09: 37
      work out systems !!! or them what to test on you ??
    2. +1
      28 June 2017 09: 40
      On Warblers, there is conventional front-line aviation
      SVP allows you to liquidate terrorist objects with conventional unguided high-explosive bombs with an accuracy not inferior to guided shells
      An order of magnitude cheaper. But the "clubfoot" old man, such a system will not hurt the same. Just in case.
    3. 0
      28 June 2017 09: 53
      The little horse, of course, is strongly said, because only 8 missiles takes. When the Americans did ALCM under the B-52, 8 were put in a drum and 8 on an external sling. Shorter than 30 tons in the B-52. And the B-1b already carries 24 AGM-158 JASSM with a range of about 1100 km.
    4. +1
      28 June 2017 10: 17
      Quote: anjey
      chasing terrorists or tracking individual objects online is by no means the function of that 95, it is not in vain that he was called a strategic one — a cruise missile strike with a nuclear warhead — that’s his “hobbyhorse” and not bombers

      ========
      And no one seemed to say that his ("Bear") function was to "drive camels" ...... Or do you think the air defense / missile defense systems are mobile, and the goal is "not worthy" already ???
      This time, secondly, if earlier for launching the CR - he had to go to a DETERMINED, SPECIFIC point, then the presence of SVP - allows you to launch from almost anywhere (if the reach of the KR allows) .... And this is already EXPENSIVE !! !!!
    5. +4
      28 June 2017 11: 27
      Tu-95 60 years waiting. Syria is its first real use, so you need to check everything you can, including the possibility of dispersing camels wink
  7. +4
    28 June 2017 09: 37
    On the electronic map, they indicate the point that must be hit, as well as the parameters of the target, after which the information is transmitted on board the aircraft.

    And there, well, on the map, is such a town called London, is there? No, I'm just interested in just ... request
    1. +2
      28 June 2017 10: 37
      Quote: perepilka
      And there, well, on the map, is such a town called London, is there? No, I'm just interested in just ...

      and you are by chance not a pilot of Tupolev brand aircraft? smile
      1. 0
        28 June 2017 12: 57
        Quote: Lukich
        and you are by chance not a pilot of Tupolev brand aircraft? smile

        Yes, what for belay . Scary! Somehow God had mercy, according to the army, what , in sappers defined
        1. +2
          29 June 2017 21: 27
          Quote: perepilka
          in sappers identified

          noooooo, the mine engineers alone cannot smile
          1. 0
            29 June 2017 22: 16
            Quote: Lukich
            noooo, sappers just one with lndon

            Yes, in a quiet, but it would be better to bring a panic, and there, pharmacies and household stores what
  8. +2
    28 June 2017 09: 48
    In general, this is the work of combat heavy drones, but so far they are not ...
  9. +4
    28 June 2017 09: 51
    ... someone here on the copper "barked" about quality and hurt Our Soviet past .... so here is one of the indicators Tacked-95-ka ..... and this is far from all .....
  10. +2
    28 June 2017 10: 05
    Quote: Gogia
    The little horse, of course, is strongly said, because only 8 missiles takes. When the Americans did ALCM under the B-52, 8 were put in a drum and 8 on an external sling. Shorter than 30 tons in the B-52. And the B-1b already carries 24 AGM-158 JASSM with a range of about 1100 km.

    I talked about nuclear warheads, in each Hiroshima missile or maybe more abruptly, and not 8 but 6 x55
    1. +1
      28 June 2017 10: 11
      maybe now they hang 8
      1. +1
        28 June 2017 10: 23
        then 8 Hiroshim, who will not find it enough?
  11. +1
    28 June 2017 10: 26
    And in my opinion, this system was developed for PAK DA, and since it was still a long time before its flight, we decided to adapt it to TU-95MS. At the same time and work it out. The principle of its application to LTH PAK YES is very suitable.
  12. 0
    28 June 2017 10: 35
    So he's on the propellers.
    1. +1
      29 June 2017 04: 02
      So the fact of the matter is that he does not need speed. Its range + missile range = he does not need to enter the enemy’s air defense and air force destruction zone. He can hang in the air for a long time, wearing a CR with special warheads. And with the ordinary, we saw their work in Syria.
      He wears only kp. For example, it may hang over the Center. Russia and keep under sight all the capitals of Z. Europe.
      PAK YES presumably also will be subsonic and probably ... propeller (my guess). hi
  13. 0
    28 June 2017 11: 17
    Quote: venik
    Quote: anjey
    chasing terrorists or tracking individual objects online is by no means the function of that 95, it is not in vain that he was called a strategic one — a cruise missile strike with a nuclear warhead — that’s his “hobbyhorse” and not bombers

    ========
    And no one seemed to say that his ("Bear") function was to "drive camels" ...... Or do you think the air defense / missile defense systems are mobile, and the goal is "not worthy" already ???
    This time, secondly, if earlier for launching the CR - he had to go to a DETERMINED, SPECIFIC point, then the presence of SVP - allows you to launch from almost anywhere (if the reach of the KR allows) .... And this is already EXPENSIVE !! !!!

    God forbid, as you say, I know that for Kr, flight route programs are written from a satellite, the terrain is read, laid down in the airplane’s comp and then on the rocket’s on-board comp and it goes completely independently along the terrain at a height of just over 50 m
  14. 0
    28 June 2017 11: 23
    But would it be possible for a hacker to transfer a false target aboard TU 95? It can more reliably transmit target designation to a central control point, where all operational and intelligence information flows, then target designation and a code for unlocking the rocket head are transmitted on board. Let it be 10 minutes longer, but less headache! recourse
  15. 0
    28 June 2017 12: 04
    Quote: da Vinci
    But would it be possible for a hacker to transfer a false target aboard TU 95? It can more reliably transmit target designation to a central control point, where all operational and intelligence information flows, then target designation and a code for unlocking the rocket head are transmitted on board. Let it be 10 minutes longer, but less headache! recourse

    what other hackers are autonomous on-board digital machines and of course without Internet access, so don’t worry
  16. 0
    28 June 2017 13: 06
    Why not drone Zenitsa about hephaestus?
  17. 0
    28 June 2017 14: 14
    Quote: New user
    So he's on the propellers.

    on carlson propellers
    1. +1
      28 June 2017 15: 39
      on that 95, turboprop engines
  18. 0
    30 June 2017 23: 25
    Solomon Kane,
    Solomon Kane,
    yes, it’s very nice, interestingly, according to NK 12, you still release screws or only repair, we only have ST blowers on the repair shop, and there were times, even the humidity in the workshop was observed, the street coolers worked