Military Review

The first Russian anti-dron gun "STUPOR"

54
Blog altyn73 posted information about the Russian antidron gun "STUPOR".


The portable complex of electromagnetic and optoelectronic suppression of civilian unmanned aerial vehicles (PKP UAV) "STUPOR" LNPA.464214.001, being the first Russian anti-drone, is serially produced from 2016 of the year at the Moscow enterprise Locational Workshop.

The first Russian anti-dron gun "STUPOR"


Its tasks include the suppression of remotely controlled aircraft, as well as drones located on the ground and water surface.

Reportedly, transportation and application are carried out by one person, from whom special skills and experience are not required. The range of the gun is limited to the visibility of the operator. As indicated, it is 500 m.
Electromagnetic and optoelectronic suppression of drones emanating from a gun, is based on the interruption of the control channels, data transmission and navigation. In addition, the complex is equipped with a laser emitter of the visible range, which allows you to partially or completely disorganize the process of video filming, carried out with the drone (if the central area of ​​video filming coincides with the direction of the operator).



According to the results of the impact of the antidron, the flight task is disrupted, the control of the operator is discontinued, navigation disorientation and shooting is disrupted. Depending on the specific variant, the UAV stops moving along the route (loses control), returns to the starting point of the route or lands safely in the impact area (the variant of the drone's behavior depends on the model, the presence of the flight task). The drone regains its working capacity upon termination of the suppression and / or its own reload. Material damage to the owner of the drone is not applied.

From the VO side, we note that, in all likelihood, the release of the considered anti-rifle is conducted exclusively for civilian needs. At the same time, as indicated, the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation is conducting tests of the product at subordinate landfills.

Protivodronovoe weapon already demonstrated in Taiwan (cm.), in Belarus (cm.) and in Syria (cm.)
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 22
    +3
    The range of the gun is limited by the visibility of the operator. As indicated, it is 500 m.
    The operator sees only 500 meters? I do not understand, they are recruiting operators from the society of the blind?
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 2 May 2017 09: 27
      19
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      I do not understand, they are recruiting operators from the society of the blind?

      What glasses do you wear?
      Can you see a copter the size of a soup plate, meters with at least 300 tons? lol
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 28
        +3
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Can you see a copter the size of a soup plate, meters with at least 300 tons?

        And if we are talking about this, what points should I give you to see it?
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 2 May 2017 09: 30
          18
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And if we are talking about this?

          You can’t dump him with such nonsense, it’s easier to shoot him - humane methods are not suitable here.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 41
            +1
            Quote: Gray Brother
            You can’t bring him down like that

            And if you read the article
            According to the results of the antidron impact, the flight mission is disrupted, the operator ceases to control, navigational disorientation and shooting failure. Depending on the particular variant, the UAV stops moving along the route (loses control), returns to the starting point of the route, or lands in safe mode at the impact site (the behavior of the drone depends on the model and the presence of the flight mission
            1. NIKNN
              NIKNN 2 May 2017 10: 06
              14
              You do not confuse DRON and UAV ...
            2. alean245
              alean245 2 May 2017 10: 46
              +8
              And if you read the article

              You wouldn’t hurt either.
              Portable complex of electromagnetic and optical-electronic suppression of unmanned aerial vehicles civilian use! (PKP UAV) "STUPOR" LNPA.464214.001, being the first Russian antidron, has been mass-produced since 2016 at the Moscow-based enterprise Lokatsionnaya Masterskaya LLC.
            3. Gray brother
              Gray brother 2 May 2017 11: 07
              +6
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              And if you read the article

              The article about inertial navigation systems does not say anything, and such a layba will not go down to 500m. - she has nothing to do there
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 11: 09
                +2
                Quote: Gray Brother
                The article about inertial navigation systems does not say anything, and such a layba will not go down to 500m. - she has nothing to do there

                So, and why throw money on such developments? Or is there a lot of unsaid in the article?
                1. Gray brother
                  Gray brother 2 May 2017 11: 34
                  +1
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  So, and why throw money on such developments?

                  The vast majority of drones do not have such a system.
                2. opus
                  opus 2 May 2017 12: 49
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  So, and why throw money on such developments?

                  it's against swarm


                  RQ-4 Global Hawk has a level in 10000m (up to 18000 in my opinion).
                  he "STUPOR" himself can stun his radar with SA from Hughes
        2. Ayratelinsion
          Ayratelinsion 2 May 2017 09: 30
          +9
          And when did IT become a civilian UAV?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 42
            +1
            Quote: Ayratelinsion
            And when did IT become a civilian UAV?

            Is it all about civilian UAVs?
            1. Ayratelinsion
              Ayratelinsion 2 May 2017 09: 53
              +6
              Oh, the comments above all?
              "First" often used before?
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 57
                +1
                Quote: Ayratelinsion
                "First" often used before?

                So it goes or not, I saw. What is written, but also saw about the characteristics. What is written. The drone returning to the base was recently described by the professor. And this is not about civilians, not about civilians at all.
                1. Ayratelinsion
                  Ayratelinsion 2 May 2017 10: 19
                  11
                  Sorry. I can’t completely help you. Porridge in my head, references to nowhere and a banal inability to read the article from beginning to end. It doesn't seem to be cured.
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 11: 09
                    +1
                    Quote: Ayratelinsion
                    It doesn't seem to be cured.

                    And you cross yourself
                    1. Ayratelinsion
                      Ayratelinsion 2 May 2017 12: 16
                      +3
                      I better spit
        3. JD1979
          JD1979 2 May 2017 09: 41
          +9
          And if it’s about this, what points should I give you to see it

          They got out of bed - their brains were not turned on. What does a heavy military drone have to do with a working flight altitude of kilometers? The gun was made for civilian and against the same civilian minidrons that fly low. You, as one opera said, do not confuse soft with warm.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 09: 45
            +1
            Quote: JD1979
            Shotgun made by dlc civil

            I read, but reading I wonder, and who the fuck is needed. Especially since the military is in the picture.
            1. Hagalaz
              Hagalaz 2 May 2017 10: 32
              +5
              The picture shows a man in a field uniform and a belly of the second laughing at least partially dressed in the same clothes. Whether they are military or not, it is impossible to conclude, to me anyway, from a smartphone.
            2. Kubik
              Kubik 2 May 2017 14: 54
              0
              it is necessary for the units of the MTR and reconnaissance, to train army UAVs that control the zone or fortify in a particular area. If the terrain is under the drone, you need to remove it with something before completing the task. Hollow out MANPADS - you will not stockpile shots. But this device is the most. Only judging by the photo - a serious infection, in the vole only in the "tiger" to transport.
        4. Santa bear
          Santa bear 2 May 2017 09: 41
          +1
          And such fly at an altitude of several kilometers. They are not visible from the ground, even to a person with excellent vision. And you won’t get it from such a gun
    2. RASKAT
      RASKAT 2 May 2017 10: 57
      +2
      The operator sees only 500 meters? I do not understand, they are recruiting operators from the society of the blind?

      I’ll tell you more, especially small reconnaissance drones are invisible beyond 100 meters.
      I would have added radar to the load of such a gun, but how will they be detected, separately assigned to look into the distance?
    3. rpek32
      rpek32 2 May 2017 11: 31
      +3
      a complex of electromagnetic and optoelectronic suppression civil unmanned aerial vehicles


      Quote: Alexander Romanov

      And if we are talking about this, what points should I give you to see it?


      about gentlemen, novels. this is a shotgun to bring down Chinese ji phantoms fool

      what do rippers / globalhawks have to do with it
  2. Gray brother
    Gray brother 2 May 2017 09: 23
    0
    Pollyama rubles and it is yours, only without a sight and a laser.
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 2 May 2017 10: 10
      +3
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Pollyama rubles and it is yours, only without a sight and a laser.

      Here's the question, how? Do you need a license for it?
      I'm not joking, only a boom with laser pointers on civilian aircraft passed ....
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 2 May 2017 10: 52
        +1
        Quote: NIKNN
        Here's the question, how? Do you need a license for it?

        You do not need a license; jammers are easily sold without a license, and this is a jammer.
  3. AID.S
    AID.S 2 May 2017 09: 24
    0
    “These are just such, only others” and not yellow, made earlier in Belarus and Taiwan. It would be interesting to compare the characteristics. And so, it’s scary to look at.
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 2 May 2017 09: 29
      +2
      Quote: AID.S
      It would be interesting to compare the characteristics. And so, it’s scary to look at.

      At the bottom of the article links, compare. hi
    2. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 2 May 2017 10: 53
      0
      Yes, exactly like that, but others, said great, agree hi But in appearance, in general, it’s not terrible. At least they showed copies with a butt antenna. lol
  4. Basarev
    Basarev 2 May 2017 09: 25
    +5
    What kind of fashion went to call Russian weapons Latin?
    1. Mikhail m
      Mikhail m 2 May 2017 10: 05
      +8
      I fully support. Who in the West needs something of ours, let them learn to read our letters. And even in the numbers of our cars we are embarrassed to put our letters. And for some reason we call our technique according to the NATO classification (more precisely, we often indicate their name next to ours). And the signs on the streets are such that you won’t immediately understand that you walk around the Russian city. And then we are surprised, we are indignant that the neighbors are switching to the Latin alphabet. It is time to declare war on the worship of the West.
    2. kolyhalovs
      kolyhalovs 2 May 2017 11: 19
      0
      I did not immediately understand what it was called - “stupor”.
  5. Delink
    Delink 2 May 2017 09: 27
    0
    Oh, the range is not enough just 500 meters!
    That would be manual, but at 20km!
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 2 May 2017 09: 55
      +1
      Quote: Delink
      That would be manual, but at 20km!

      Manual is unlikely, but there are already such)))
    2. Shukshin
      Shukshin 2 May 2017 09: 59
      +1
      This is the first swallow, and soon will be like that.
  6. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 2 May 2017 10: 05
    +2
    Why this unknown bullshit? From small arms to bring down easier and cheaper.
    1. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 2 May 2017 11: 02
      +3
      Oh oh From the prone position, they do not immediately begin to enter the thoracic target. And up, on the drone, but from a distance of 50-100 meters? And higher? Do you really get it? From Kalash then?
      Already fully written to you about civilian use. What rifleman are you talking about?
      1. Sergeant71
        Sergeant71 2 May 2017 11: 18
        +2
        From 50-100 meters from the Kalash only the blind and armless will not get into it. And from the shotgun only the way. Moreover, it will be guaranteed damage, and not 50/50 of this mandala costing 20 Kalashi and certainly, like any other electronics, which is plugging.
        1. Hagalaz
          Hagalaz 2 May 2017 11: 36
          +2
          Who is it in him? Global Hawk mean? Have you met many shotguns in our army? A lot of shotguns made finishing up to 500 meters?
          But in something you are right, the craftsmen have enough of course. Recently, the film Elysium was repeated - he grabbed a piece of iron from the ground and knocked down a drone, Any Tom Cruise will be able to. Even if the enemy shoots or throws mines. wink
          1. Krabik
            Krabik 2 May 2017 14: 54
            0
            It's easier to throw a grenade and not to bathe ...
          2. Sergeant71
            Sergeant71 3 May 2017 04: 46
            +2
            When it is written that it is impossible to get into the drone flying 50-100 meters from the shooter from the Kalash, it becomes clear that you saw this same Kalash only in the movies and have no idea what it really is. Saiga is in service with the same Rosguard, where my son serves. I have no doubt that it is easier to buy 10 data carbines in full mincemeat than one difficult-to-use mandala with a controversial effect. Everything else, about Elysium and Tom Cruise - verbiage.
  7. Moore
    Moore 2 May 2017 10: 14
    +3
    Quote: Alexander Romanov

    I read, but reading I wonder, and who the fuck is needed. Especially since the military is in the picture.

    If you read the article, then the military - because everything happens at the MO training ground.
    About "fucking" - a drone of some zhurnalyug hanging over a sensitive facility, a drone of some idiots over the airport or over trenches in the DPR; an article by Svidomo volunteers - is this not the purpose for this device?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 2 May 2017 10: 18
      +1
      Quote: Moore
      About "fucking" - a drone of some zhurnalyug hanging over a sensitive facility, a drone of some idiots over the airport or over trenches in the DPR; an article by Svidomo volunteers - is this not the purpose for this device?

      All quadrocopters are shot down without such weapons.
      1. Hagalaz
        Hagalaz 2 May 2017 11: 41
        +1
        What, for example, over a civilian, nonetheless, a sensitive object? We agreed on civil in the application?
  8. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 2 May 2017 10: 23
    +1
    Rougeau "STUPOR" ..... Yes. All this is troublesome! Canal! Point ... turn on ... and wait: it works, it won’t work, when it works ... but what to do, since it doesn’t work? Yes, better take the "old" MANPADS "Kolos"! Mande ..... Mander him and you will have a successful hunt! If the chips from the downed drone are “pushed” in the market, then by the weekend it will be “drink and have a bite”! good
  9. Turgon
    Turgon 2 May 2017 10: 32
    +1
    In short, send to Syria to the front, against Israeli and American UAVs and then we'll see what they cost.
  10. spirit
    spirit 2 May 2017 10: 43
    +2

    Dima Approves))) I suppose I’ll buy 20 pieces right away) and even the slaves on the drones flew over dachas of the galley workers laughing
  11. shinobi
    shinobi 2 May 2017 10: 59
    +2
    Civilian model, paparazzi and voyeurists to drive. The military usually receive-receive channel electronics either burn out tries .. (portable versions) or take control (military electronic warfare)
  12. sa-ag
    sa-ag 2 May 2017 11: 38
    0
    These are the cheapest drones to drive, it’s good, for example, DJI Phantom drones can fly on a 3D map built by them, and jamming a GSM signal from the ground is very interesting fun :-) From the tower you can ...
  13. Pavlovsky
    Pavlovsky 2 May 2017 13: 17
    +3
    It vaguely reminds me ...

    Oh, the fifth element, well, almost
  14. Vlad Sergeevich
    Vlad Sergeevich 2 May 2017 18: 26
    0
    It seems that all people are smart, adults, but did not understand. It’s Dimon who ordered a gun to bring down drones
  15. Ruslan Schurov
    Ruslan Schurov 3 May 2017 16: 49
    0
    The drone can be of different sizes from a toy helicopter to a range of several meters. So the working range is quite sufficient.