How did the Lebanese war of the year 1982 begin

32
How did the Lebanese war of the year 1982 begin

The current war in Syria and Iraq (the “Middle East Front”) makes us recall the relatively recent historical by the standards, the USSR’s confrontation with the USA and Israel, where Syria also acted as a battlefield. Damascus was then an ally of Moscow in the struggle against the establishment of American order in the Middle East. During the Lebanon War of 1982, Israel and Syria waged a high-tech war in Lebanon. The battle was land, air and partly naval. The USSR then confidently won in one of the battles of the so-called. Cold War (more precisely, the Third World War).

The confrontation began with the civil war in Lebanon. The Lebanese civil war was caused by three major factors. First, it is a strong religious and ethnic heterogeneity of Lebanese society, which caused opposition to the Christian and Muslim parts of the country. The Christian civilization in the Middle East experienced a sunset, and the Muslim and Arab, on the contrary, a surge of passionarity. However, in Lebanon, Christians historically had some advantage, therefore Muslims, with the growth of their number and military-political power, decided to turn the tide in their favor.



Secondly, it is the Palestinian factor. Palestinians-Arabs lost in the fight against the Jews, who did not create an Arab Palestinian state and seized the lands that had long been settled by Arabs. Jews believed that the Palestinian Arabs already have their own state - Jordan. Palestinians fled en masse to Jordan, then to Lebanon. The Palestinian radical militarized organizations, realizing their goals in the struggle against Israel, for which they needed a base and resources, destabilized Jordan and Lebanon. However, in Jordan there was a strong army, created with the help of Western states, which was able to maintain order. There was no strong army in Lebanon. The Palestinians strengthened the Muslim community in Lebanon, destroyed order in the state.

Thirdly, it is the intervention of external forces that had their interest in Lebanon and in the region as a whole. These are the actions of Israel, the USA, Syria (supported by the Soviet Union), and other Arab countries. Thus, the conflict between Arab countries and Israel over water and resources led to a series of wars that destabilized the entire region, in particular, Lebanon.

Lebanon sought to avoid intervention in the 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars. However, after 1967, Palestinian guerrillas repeatedly attacked Israel from refugee camps in Lebanon. Armed actions in return followed, and the Lebanese government attempted to limit Palestinian attacks from its territory. The situation was finally destabilized by the civil war in Jordan, during which King Hussein expelled the armed forces of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from Jordan. The influx of Palestinian Arabs into the country has placed Lebanon at the center of the confrontation between Israel, Syria and the Palestinians. It also split Lebanese society over the PLO’s stay in Lebanon and the participation of Palestinians in the country's political life, and destroyed the confessional balance in the country.

Lebanon

Lebanon is a small country in the Middle East, located in a mountainous area on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean. In the east and north it borders with Syria, in the south - with Israel. State formations in Lebanon originated in ancient times, but they are not related to the modern Arab state. Lebanon is known for having established the famous trading state of Phenicia on its territory. Phenicia flourished in the 1200-800 years. BC e. In the VI century BC. e. Phenicia came under the rule of the Persians, led by Cyrus the Great, becoming part of the Persian Empire. In 332 BC. e. Alexander of Macedon made a trip to Phenicia, destroying its largest city - Tire. With the collapse of the Macedonian empire, Lebanon became part of the Seleucid Kingdom, and at the end of the 1st century BC. e. - Roman Empire. In the period of the Arab conquests and the formation of the Caliphate, Lebanon became part of the Islamic and Arab world. In the XII century during the crusades, Lebanon became part of the kingdom of Jerusalem Crusaders. In 1261, the crusaders were expelled from Lebanon by the Egyptians, and Lebanon was part of Egypt until the 1516 year. In 1517, the Turkish Sultan Selim I annexed this territory to the Ottoman Empire.

The territory of Lebanon as part of Greater Syria has been part of Turkey for more than 400 years. After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I and the collapse of the empire, the territory of Greater Syria was occupied in 1918 by British troops. By agreement of Sykes-Picot from 1916 between the countries of the Entente, the territory of Syria was transferred to France. The French received a management mandate from the League of Nations. In 1926, the territory of Lebanon was separated from Syria, and Lebanon became a separate territorial unit, however, managed by the French administration. In 1940, France was occupied by the Third Reich. In Lebanon, formed a national government. In 1943, Lebanon officially gained independence.

Thus, due to its convenient geographical location (which was appreciated by the ancient Phoenician traders, as well as their predecessors and heirs), Lebanon became the place of intersection of many ancient and modern cultures, religions and civilizations. The country stood out among other Arab states for religious and national diversity, while from the early Middle Ages the Christian community prevailed, which received some privileges during the rule of the French. Both Christianity and Islam in Lebanon are presented in the form of a wide variety of confessions. The largest communities are: Sunni, Shia, and Maronite (Maronite Catholic Church). Therefore, the unwritten “National Pact” in 1944 established a rule according to which a Maronite Christian should be president of the country, a Sunni Muslim should be prime minister, and a Shiite Muslim should be the speaker of parliament. The constitution adopted on the basis of the National Pact reinforced the religious fragmentation that existed in Lebanon. Parliament seats were divided into 6 / 5 proportions, where 6 are Christians and 5 are Muslims.

However, gradually the balance of power began to shift in favor of the Muslims, which happened with the growth of their numbers. In 1948, Lebanon took part in the first Arab-Israeli war. Tens of thousands of Arab refugees who had strengthened the Muslim community moved to Lebanon. As a result, controversies between Christians and Muslims began to intensify in the 1950s. During the Suez crisis, the pro-Western President Camille Chamoun (Maronite by religion) did not break off diplomatic relations with the Western powers that attacked Egypt, which led to a diplomatic conflict with Cairo. In response to the President’s actions, the Muslim community formed the National Front, demanding a policy of “positive neutrality” and friendship with Arab countries. Mass political demonstrations took the form of a Muslim uprising in May 1958, led by former prime ministers Rashid Karame and Abdullah Yafi and chairman of parliament Hamade. It quickly grew into a civil war. She managed to stop only with the help of American intervention (operation "Blue bat"). American troops were able to quickly take control of the situation. President Chamoun was persuaded to resign, moderate Fuad Shehab took his place. One of the rebel leaders, Rashid Karame, became prime minister. Conflict between religious communities was temporarily stabilized.

It is worth noting that at this time Lebanon was a prosperous state, the financial and banking capital of the Arab world. Lebanon remained aloof from the Arab-Israeli conflicts, maintained neutrality, trying to maintain good relations with both its Arab neighbors and the countries of the West. For which he received the unofficial name "Middle Eastern Switzerland". Lebanon was also popular with tourists. The mild Mediterranean climate in the narrow seaside valley, the most beautiful cedar groves, the cleanest sea and the monuments of ancient cultures seemed to secure for this country the reputation of a tourist paradise. Beirut was considered the “pearl” of the Middle East. However, it was not possible to preserve this status due to the religious split in the country, the intensification of Arab nationalism and the absence of a strong army that could preserve the existing situation in the conditions of the influx of Palestinian refugees.


US forces in Beirut in 1958

The confrontation of the Arab countries and Israel. "Black September"

The six-day 1967 war ended with Israel’s victory over the Arab coalition. Arab countries had multiple numerical superiority over the armed forces of Israel. The technical level of weapons of Arab countries and Israel was about equal. However, the Arabs overestimated their strength. Israel hit first, and by concentrating forces in one direction, it consistently defeated opponents. The war cost the Arabs the loss of control over East Jerusalem, the loss of the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, Sinai and the Golan Heights on the Israeli-Syrian border. This provided the Israeli armed forces with strategic superiority over their neighbors, even in terms of their numerical superiority.

From 1967 to 1970, there was a war of "exhaustion" between Egypt and Israel. The ideologist of this war was Egyptian President Nasser. He believed that continuous artillery shelling and aviation strikes will force the Jewish state to constantly keep the armed forces on alert, which will lead to major economic problems. This, in his opinion, should have forced the Israeli leadership to comply with UN Security Council resolution No. 242 on the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the occupied territories. However, Israel has withstood the mobilization regime. At this time, Egypt, with the help of the USSR, built a powerful air defense system, step by step bringing the S-75 and S-125 batteries to the Suez Canal, and Israel mercilessly bombed the enemy. The Soviet air defense specialists, who caused heavy damage to the Israeli air force, were directly involved in the hostilities. As a result, on August 7, a truce was concluded between Israel and Egypt.

After the end of the Six Day War 1967 and the establishment of Israeli control over the West Bank, a large number of Palestinian refugees settled in the Kingdom of Jordan, and the territory of the country became a logistical base for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Also in Jordan, most of the radical groups of Palestinian Arabs were founded. This caused the external and internal destabilization of Jordan: the conflict with Israel, the attempts of the Palestinians to gain autonomy in the kingdom, which led to clashes of Palestinians with the Jordanian security officials. In the 1969 year, when under the auspices of the United States, it came to concluding a separate peace between Israel and Jordan, leftist radical groups of Palestinians, worried about this prospect, which clearly did not envisage the creation of an independent Palestinian state, force military actions against Israelis. King Hussein’s power swayed.

At the end of July 1970, Egypt and Jordan unexpectedly announced that they support the American Middle East settlement plan (Rogers plan). This was the formal end to the “war of attrition”. Palestinian leftist organizations have decided to fail this plan. Palestinian radicals planned to overthrow the Jordanian King Hussein and create a new state entity on the "east bank of the Jordan River." As a result, September 1970 of the year went down in history as “Black September”. On 1 of September 1970, Palestinian militants attempted the assassination of the king, which failed. At the same time, the militants made several hijackings of aircraft. This has led to increased outrage among Palestinians in the world. Hussein decided that the time for a tough answer had come.

On September 16, Hussein announced the introduction of martial law, and in the evening Tanks The 60th Armored Brigade entered Amman from all sides and, with the support of motorized infantry, began storming the camps and the fortified positions of the Palestinians. Palestinians fought stubbornly. Moreover, the Palestine Liberation Army (led by Yasser Arafat), the PLO military wing, was actively supported by Syria. A division of the Syrian army invaded Jordan, but it was stopped by Jordanian forces. In addition, Israel and the United States expressed their willingness to support Jordan. Damascus withdrew troops. Without the support of the Syrians, the Palestinians could not stand it. Royal artillery and aviation consistently destroyed Palestinian camps in Amman and the surrounding area. The army was advancing on all the strongholds of the Palestinians. Palestinians agreed to a ceasefire.

Arafat and Hussein went to the summit of Arab leaders in Cairo. And there 27 September 1970, the recent winner King Hussein was forced to sign an agreement leaving the Palestinian militant organizations the right to act in Jordan. It seemed that Arafat won a full diplomatic victory. However, September 28 at the age of just 52 years suddenly died Egyptian President Nasser. And in Syria, just two months later, a military coup occurred. Syrian Defense Minister Hafez Assad became president of the country. For a while, the Syrians had no time for Jordan. Hussein had the opportunity to add the situation in his favor. Arafat realized that he had lost and signed an agreement with Hussein, which fully recognized the sovereignty of the Jordanian king. However, this agreement was not accepted by left-radical groups, which continued to resist until the summer of 1971. Their defeat was complete. PLO militants led by Yasir Arafat and representatives of other factions were forced to flee to Lebanon. Tens of thousands of Palestinian refugees poured into Lebanon.

Thus, Lebanon received a “gift” from Jordan - tens of thousands of refugees, among whom was a radical core, armed and ready for action. At the same time, Lebanon, unlike Jordan, did not have a strong army that would be able to “reassure” the Palestinian militants. And within the country there was already a conflict between Christians and Muslims, a split into the Christian and Arab elites. The arrival of the "army" of Palestinian refugees intensified the internal conflict in Lebanon.

Civil war in lebanon

The status of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon was determined by the provisions of the Cairo Agreement between the Chairman of the PLO Executive Committee Y. Arafat and the Commander-in-Chief of the Lebanese Army, General Bustani. The agreement was signed on November 3 1969 of the year through the mediation of Egypt and Syria and the active support of the League of Arab States (LAS). Palestinians had the right in Lebanon to work, reside and participate in the resistance movement, to participate in the Palestinian revolution while respecting the sovereignty and security of Lebanon. Lebanon agreed to be present in the refugee camps of Palestinian armed forces.

Palestinian militants in Lebanon acted as in Jordan. The PLO, with the active assistance of a number of Arab countries, turned South Lebanon into a stronghold in its actions against Israel, into an operational and training base for militants and a number of radical organizations. The territory adjacent to the northern border of Israel was completely controlled by the PLO and even received the name Fathland. Palestinian militants launched attacks against Israeli territory from Lebanese territory. In turn, Israel conducted military operations in the border areas of southern Lebanon before the start of the civil war in Lebanon.

As a result, the Palestinians created their "state within a state" in Lebanon. Palestinian camps and settlements have become pockets of crime and terrorism. In 1973, the Palestinians won the right to have their own armed forces in Lebanon. Especially from the arbitrariness of the Palestinians the population of South Lebanon suffered, where mostly Maronite Christians and Shiite Muslims lived. The aggressive actions of Palestinian militants led to the complete destabilization of the country and finally split the country on religious grounds. The Muslim elite of Lebanon decided to use the presence of a large number of Palestinian militants, mostly Sunni Muslims, to redistribute power in the country to their advantage, limiting the rights of the Christian community. The Lebanese army was traditionally weak and could not crush the Palestinian radicals, as happened in Jordan. Therefore, the Christians took the path of organizing their own self-defense units (militia). Their armed detachments also formed in other religious communities and parties, both in solidarity with the Palestinians and those who opposed the Palestinian presence.

Thus, in the end, in 1975, a full-scale civil war began in the country. Lebanon has split along political and confessional lines: right-wing Christians against left-wing Muslims, including Palestinians.



To be continued ...
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    29 March 2017 07: 24
    The agreement was signed on November 3, 1969, with the mediation of Egypt and Syria and the active support of the League of Arab States (LAS) .- Water sharpens the stone. How the role of the LAS under the influence of money has changed- "life-giving dollar"
    a lot of the United States gave to achieve its goal.
    And we?
    rot your line Vovka.
  2. +2
    29 March 2017 07: 47
    The Lebanese war of 1982, was covered in great detail in the magazine "New Time" ... Photo collages on the cover, interview ..
    1. +1
      29 March 2017 08: 30
      There were wars on this territory since ancient times. As far back as the XNUMXth century BC, Egypt fought with the peoples of the sea, he lost his possessions in Syria and Palestine. Previously, he gained these possessions under Ramses II during the war against the Hittites. Under Ramses III ----- the war with the peoples of the sea generally threatened the loss of Egypt's independence! In II – III centuries of our era, there was a war between Rome and the Sassanid Empire, ending with the capture of Queen Zenobia and the liquidation of Antioch Despotia and Palmyra (present Syria).
      1. +4
        29 March 2017 10: 28
        On the territory of Lebanon once lived the Phoenicians. The same people that
        founded and Carthage. The Jews were friends with the Phoenicians: they were sailors,
        and the "land" Judea (the Greeks lived on the coast) exported
        agricultural. products: olive oil, wine.
        The Phoenicians sold it throughout the Mediterranean.
        Even the language of the two peoples invented a joint: Aramito-Phoenician letter -
        it is believed that this is one of the oldest alphabetic (non-hieroglyphic languages).
        1. +5
          29 March 2017 19: 06
          In fact, phonetic writing is not a criterion for progress.
          Firstly, there is no sharp border between ideomatic, syllabic and phonetic writing. An example of this is the hieroglyphs of Egypt and the Cretan linear letter "" B ".
          Secondly, many ancient and modern distinctive peoples have preserved syllabic alphabets for millennia. Examples are Ancient Persia, Modern India, Korea, Myanmar, Indonesia, Tibet, and + another Cherokee tribe in the states.
          Thirdly, the Chinese entered the 2st century and became a superpower with one of the oldest types of writing! And the Japanese, although they created XNUMX alphabets, but --- only for the press (Katakama and Hiragama), are also syllabic! And they preserved the traditional hieroglyphs.
          And for example, the Gauls BC there was already a phonetic ogamic letter! And where are the Gauls now?
          1. +3
            30 March 2017 08: 55
            "In fact, phonetic writing is not a criterion for progress" ///

            And I did not write about progress smile .
            He wrote that the Phoenicians from Lebanon and the Jews from Judea once traded and were friends drinks .
        2. 0
          30 March 2017 14: 02
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Even the language of the two peoples invented a joint: Aramito-Phoenician letter -
          it is believed that this is one of the oldest alphabetic (non-hieroglyphic languages).

          Many scholars generally justifiably argue that the Phoenicians and Jews are one people, or at least people from one root, only the first are pagans, the second professed monotheism. And in the days of the beginning, and the heyday of Phenicia, Judaism in general has not yet formed as a separate religion.
          1. 0
            30 March 2017 14: 59
            There is evidence that the Phoenician king Hiram was a friend of King Solomon and sent him workers to build the Temple.
            And the Jews always traded with everyone. And who was friends with whom? You can find out if you look at the plot about the February Revolution in Moscow in the PHOTO AND VIDEO section. Yiddish, Hebrew, Sephardic, Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic.
  3. +5
    29 March 2017 10: 37
    Participants also told me about the 1982 war:
    "... We crawl, we run across, and on karachki (we are afraid of snipers) along the street of Beirut, dirty, sweaty.
    Near the cafe: French music, ladies in beautiful dresses, a neckline, elegant decorations,
    European hairstyles. Drink wine from glasses ...
    Lady (in good English, but French among themselves): "soldiers, what are you crawling there?
    sit down, tell us about yourself, have a snack ... " smile
    1. +1
      29 March 2017 15: 19
      Waltz with Bashir !!!
    2. +6
      29 March 2017 15: 48
      Quote: voyaka uh
      We crawl, run across, and on karachki (we are afraid of snipers) along the street of Beirut, dirty, sweaty.

      And nearby Merkava burns out lol


      Palestinian fighters Valid Jumblatt on the background of the burnt Israeli Merkava. Beirut, 1982
      1. +7
        29 March 2017 20: 01
        Therefore, they lost because they look like monkeys - primitive creatures like people jump around a fire with beads.
      2. +5
        30 March 2017 14: 11
        Quote: quilted jacket
        Palestinian fighters Valid Jumblatt on the background of the burnt Israeli Merkava. Beirut, 1982

        Valida Jumblata? recourse What side is he here?
        Walid Jumblath - Lebanese politician, leader of the Progressive Socialist Party, has repeatedly held government posts, one of the secular leaders Druze communities.

        He is not a Muslim at all, but friends! The Druze enjoyed the support of the USSR - after all, the Progressive Socialist Party! bully -, but they fought only for their interests, not particularly supporting the Sunni Palestinians. Jumblath joined the pro-Syrian Front nat. salvation because Israel supported the Maronites, with whom the Druze had constant conflicts. But at the same time, the Druze fought against the Shiites, who were supported by Syria, and very fiercely.
        But to the so-called Walid Jumblath has nothing to do with the Palestinians. stop From the word "absolutely"! bully
        1. 0
          April 5 2017 20: 48
          Quote: andj61
          He is not a Muslim at all, but friends!

          Yes, of course I was mistaken - just the fighters of Valid Jumblatt amid the burnt Merkava.
          Quote: andj61
          Jumblath joined the pro-Syrian Front nat. salvation because Israel supported the Maronites, with whom the Druze had constant conflicts. But at the same time, the Druze fought against the Shiites, who were supported by Syria, and very fiercely

          And where does the Shiites? He is on the background of the burnt Merkava and not on the background of Shiite corpses lol
  4. +6
    29 March 2017 19: 55
    It was necessary to take away more territories to Israel, so as not to be disastrous. Israel was forced to return the Sinai Peninsula, and here is the result - the igil sits there.

    In any attack, the entire territory with which it came should be captured. Until the Arab world was reduced to Tehran. This is common sense.
    1. +2
      29 March 2017 20: 27
      Quote: Rabinovich
      It was necessary to take away more territories to Israel, so as not to be disastrous. Israel was forced to return the Sinai Peninsula, and here is the result - the igil sits there.
      In any attack, the entire territory with which it came should be captured. Until the Arab world was reduced to Tehran. This is common sense.
      Israel wouldn’t exist such a logic
      force the Israeli leadership to comply UN Security Council Resolution No. 242 on Withdrawal of Israeli Forces from Occupied Territories
      Although the law is not written for the “chosen ones” (by the way, I’m not talking about Jews. I have a Jewish friend and we have an excellent relationship). hi
    2. +4
      30 March 2017 05: 54
      Until the Arab world shrinks to Tehran
      Tehran is already the Persian world.
  5. +7
    30 March 2017 05: 53
    Secondly, this is the Palestinian factor. Palestinian Arabs lost in the fight against Jews who did not allow the creation of an Arab Palestinian state and seized lands that had long been settled by Arabs. Jews believed that the Palestinian Arabs already have their own state - Jordan.
    First of all. It was the Arabs who refused to recognize Israel. The question was to survive. Where did the Arabs come to these lands? Actually, there were lands of the Orthodox Byzantine Empire, largely populated by Jews. The Arabs simply slaughtered both.
    1. +4
      30 March 2017 06: 42
      aleks700 and that the Jews have already become Orthodox? laughing
      1. +1
        April 1 2017 16: 00
        Never before! What did not stop them from living on their lands as part of the Empire
        1. +1
          April 3 2017 13: 11
          Quote: aleks700
          did not stop them from living in their lands as part of the Empire

          And not in the empire - also, incl. over a millennium and a half before the formation of the Byzantine Empire, and over a millennium more than before the emergence of the Roman Empire, with the collapse of which the East Roman, later Byzantine, was formed.
          1. 0
            April 4 2017 12: 26
            Right. I just took the situation before the Arab conquest.
    2. +3
      30 March 2017 14: 23
      Quote: aleks700
      It was the Arabs who refused to recognize Israel. The question was to survive. Where did the Arabs come to these lands? Actually, there were lands of the Orthodox Byzantine Empire, largely populated by Jews. The Arabs simply slaughtered both.

      good It is also worth considering that 90% of Sunnis in the region — yes, the West Bank, Israel, Lebanon, up to 60% in Syria and Jordan — are Arabs brought from the Sudan, Egypt, Iraq by the British and the French. Then the region was under their protectorate under the mandate of the League of Nations - Palestine (present-day Israel, Jordan, West Bank, etc.) - England, Lebanon and Syria - France. At this time, England transferred from the Palestine to the Syria the Golan Heights - the mine fired later. A mine in the form of a significant number of newcomers of the Sunni population is now working. And the indigenous Bedouins living in the desert do not consider themselves to be one people with these Arabs, despite the fact that they themselves are Arabs, and mainly Sunnis.
      1. +2
        April 5 2017 11: 48
        like the Middle Eastern Christians (including the Israelis), they do not consider themselves to be the same people as the Arabs - as they say "we are descendants of the Crusaders, and we speak Arabic because it is a generally accepted language in this territory"
  6. +2
    30 March 2017 09: 40
    Quote: Rabinovich
    In any attack, the entire territory with which it came should be captured. Until the Arab world was reduced to Tehran. This is common sense.

    ------------------------------
    This, my friend, already smacks of some kind of Hitlerism. To seize territory, and to drive people into a stall. You turn out to be a big anti-Semite. Let me remind you that Arabs are the same Semitic people as Jews (children of the Sim-biblical character). hi
  7. +2
    30 March 2017 09: 45
    Quote: aleks700
    Orthodox Byzantine Empire

    Quote: Uncle Murzik
    aleks700 and that the Jews have already become Orthodox?

    ----------------------
    As for the "Orthodox" Jews and the "Orthodox" Byzantine Empire, these are such strong passages. Let's stick to the term “orthodox,” that is, the original. "Orthodoxy" is the Russian designation of the original church, as it were, of course, a synonym for "orthodox", but purely Russian.
  8. +7
    31 March 2017 16: 12
    I never understood our fanatical love for the Palestinians.
    Rather, our top political leadership.
    For me it would be better to build relations with Israel. Moreover, there are about a million of our former compatriots, Russian Jews, so to speak. What about the Arabs? They blow up buses, shoot at residential neighborhoods, a terrorist attack for them is a normal way of relations with an opponent. And the reception of Hamas leaders in the Kremlin by Putin is generally a nonsense look. Not every leader of the countries will be honored with this, but here a terrorist organization .. I understand that there are all anti-Semites and my opinion does not fit. You can love Jews, you can not love, but how you can make friendship with Palestinian extremists for so many years - I don’t understand. Wherever they come, chaos and blood are everywhere ..
  9. +4
    April 3 2017 11: 40
    "During the Lebanon war of 1982, Israel and Syria waged a high-tech war in Lebanon. The battle was land, air and partly naval. The USSR then confidently won one of the battles of the so-called Cold War (more precisely, the Third World War)."

    What victory the USSR surely gained, if the war was fought by Syria and Israel, I did not understand. What is it about? One defeat of the Syrian air defense was worth it. In my opinion, the Syrians are still afraid to even include their air defense installations.
    1. 0
      April 3 2017 13: 14
      Quote: stone
      In my opinion, the Syrians are still afraid to even include their air defense installations.

      Well, they recently turned on, shot down an Israeli drone.
      On this occasion, Israel has many bays and demanded that the Syrians do not dare to attack Israeli planes over their territory, by the way, otherwise the Jews will be offended.
      1. +1
        April 3 2017 13: 37
        Che they shot down there? He most likely fell for technical reasons. Even if they shot down a skylark - a small cheap UAV, almost a consumable. And everything else, including fighters with pilots, flies quietly, and there are already dozens of attacks.
  10. 0
    12 October 2017 22: 35
    Quote: stone
    One defeat of the Syrian air defense that cost

    What a rout? There was no rout
    1. 0
      5 December 2017 13: 29
      But what happened in the Bekaa Valley in June 1982?
      Even Comrade Yashkin in 1988 was forced to write:
      "... I must admit, andZrailtyans managed to capture and maintain superiority in the air and over the battlefield. Many factors contributed to this, but I will name only a few, from my point of view, the main ones: a good airborne detection system, which relied on Hokai early warning aircraft and ground-based radars installed at dominant heights in the combat area; the presence of an electronic warfare system, which makes it possible to eavesdrop on the radio networks of the Syrian Air Force: intercepting orders coming from the ground to board the Syrian aircraft, the Israelis jammed their radio networks and radars. The "stunned" and "blinded" Syrian pilots fell under the sudden blows of the Israeli; the presence of air-to-air missiles of the Sayduinder, Python-3 (Israel) type, capable of hitting targets from long ranges and from various angles.
      The reader may ask, why didn’t we, Soviet specialists, help the Syrians achieve a reaction equal to that reached by the Israelis? My answer is: we could not do this."