Assault and attack parts of the Russian army in the First World War. Part of 3

21
As already noted, as an annex to the order of the Special Army, an instruction was developed which provided for the creation of shock battalions. In addition, the processes taking place in the Russian army after the February 1917 coup led to the emergence of new shock units and the so-called “death” units. They became shock weapons command, while the main part of the army, gradually decomposing, lost its combat capability.

Under the conditions of 1917, the shock battalions had to act not only at the tip of the breakthrough (ie, perform assault missions), but also to be a stronghold of order, carriers of high morale and fidelity to duty — the core around which troops could unite during the decomposition of the army loyal oath



Thus, the technical tasks (breakthrough of the positional front) gave way to the moral-fighting (an example of the valiant discharge of duty). Accordingly, special tactics and training of shock battalions began to be lost, and over time, a number of conventional units and formations fell into the category of "shock". It was enough for the personnel of the unit to decide on assigning to it the status of the “death” part, as it fell into the category of “shock”. Many volunteer units formed in the revolutionary 1917 year fell into this category.

The “oath promise” of the “death” volunteer has been preserved, in which he promised with his life, honor and freedom without question and, following the first order of the commander, execute the order and fight until victory [RGVIA. F. 2620. Op. 2. D. 67. L. 362].

The command of the current army tried to restore order in the matter of structuring the shock parts. Thus, the order No. 547 of the General Commander of the cavalry A. A. Brusilov from 27. 06. 1917 required no mix of shock and revolutionary battalions. The order clarified that the shock units (which now also included companies and “death” battalions) are formed in infantry and cavalry regiments from volunteers of these regiments and are included in the structure of the corresponding regiment. It was noted that in the infantry regiment a shock unit with the size of a battalion company was created (if the entire regiment did not wish to become a shock). The strike part was to serve as an example for the rest and go for a breakthrough in the vanguard of the regiment. The revolutionary battalions must be formed in accordance with the order of 13. 06. 1917 d. No. 439 of volunteers, junkers, soldiers of spare and other rear units.

The first shock battalions were formed mainly from the composition of the so-called "third divisions" (1916 appeared in October - February 1917). The newly formed, without any spikes and combat experience, they began to decompose faster than others, and for patriotic soldiers and officers who served in them, going into special shock units became, firstly, an opportunity to avoid humiliation and attacks from the degrading soldiers. -second, the ability to actually continue to fight with the enemy.

Lieutenant-General A. I. Denikin, during this period, the Chief of Staff of the Supreme Commander, recalled that those soldiers and officers who had a conscience or tired sad, full of profanity, laziness and mischief in army infantry left the formed attack companies and battalions shelves. In the regiments, according to the testimony of the general, the percussionists were reserved and often vicious. When the time came to attack, they went on the enemy's barbed wire, under a deadly fire - often under a hail of not only enemy bullets, but also evil ridicule from their former comrades. Considering the reliability of the shock units, they were used to reconnoitre, guard and pacify the rioters - and they "took the rap" for their entire regiment, the personnel of which gradually got out of control [Denikin A. I. Essays on Russian distemper. The collapse of power and the army February-September 1917g. Plural 2002 C. 347].

The immediate initiator of the formation of front-line attack units of the new type was (at that time) the commander-in-chief of the armies of the South-Western Front, cavalry general A. A. Brusilov, who acted with the support of the front committee. He also approved a special distinctive badge for shock battalions (“death”) - a red-black chevron downward on the right sleeve of the tunic (tunic).

Assault and attack parts of the Russian army in the First World War. Part of 3


10, 11. Variants of the emblems on the headgear of the fighters of the shock and assault units of 1917 (Adam's head).


12. The banner of the "death" part.

There were a lot of volunteers among the "drummers" - the core of the shock units was young people, ready to sacrifice themselves in the name of the Motherland. Some battalions were nominal: the Kornilov shock battalion (initially called the Shock or 1 Assault Squad), the “death” battalion of the 2 rank Shishko (the Revel naval battalion “death”), etc.

The shock movement from the end of spring 1917 went "from the bottom" - and in this sense, the command only tried to take it under control.

Thus, the proposal for the formation of the shock battalion of the 8 Army came from the assistant to the senior adjutant of the Intelligence Division of the army headquarters, Captain M. O. Nezhentsev. Lieutenant General L. G. Kornilov, appointed in May by the army commander, supported this initiative. Order on the army from 19. 05. 1917 was commanded by the commander to form the 1 Shock Squad. Although MO Nezhentsev attracted experienced volunteer officers to this 6 case, freshly baked ensigns became the core of the officer corps. The first in the detachment was formed machine-gun team, and only then she "overgrown" infantry companies. L. G. Kornilov gave parts of his patronage, and in June a detachment was formed: it consisted of 2 battalions of 1 thousands of bayonets each, 3 of machine-gun commands, teams of foot reconnaissance (it included captured volunteers - Czechs) and hundreds of Cossack cavalry scouts. The detachment was entered not only one by one, but also by subunits, such as the hundreds of 38 Don Cossack Regiment and the gunners of the 3 Siberian Mining Artillery Division. The Kornilov detachment received its military baptism 25 June from the village. Pavelche, during the offensive 8 th army. In this battle, the detachment proved to be excellent and captured trophies, among which are 2 light and 4 heavy weapons [Kornilovsky Shock Regiment. Paris, 1936. C. 23]. The detachment was sent to the most dangerous sectors of the front.


13. Drummers Kornilov on the front. Summer 1917


14. The banner of the Kornilov shock regiment.

Similarly, at the initiative of the officers, the “death” battalion of the 38 Infantry Division was created: in spring 1917, the staff captain of the 152 Infantry Regiment of Vladikavkaz General Yermolov, V.P. Egorov, sent the “death” battalion to the Minister of War and, having received approval , appealed to the troops to join the movement - and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief from cavalry A. A. Brusilov and Commander-in-Chief of the armies of the Northern front, cavalry general A. M. Dragomirov supported this initiative. The battalion was recruited not by a separate battalion from the volunteers of the 19 Army Corps: mainly (for the 3 officer and 40 soldiers from each regiment) parts of the 38 infantry division. Drummers got a special form: the sleeves and the side of the tunic were trimmed with black and white ribbon, buttons and cockade, “as a sign of civil liberty” - red matter; encryption on shoulder straps consisted of a skull with bones and the number "38". On 28 June 1917, the unit consisted of 4 infantry companies and 2 special teams (machine-gun and communications) and consisted of 26 officers and about 1100 drummers [Fomin M. The death battalion of the 38th Infantry Division // Military Story. No. 8 (137). 1996. C. 27].

Only six months after the decision of A. A. Brusilov, more than three dozen shock (“death”, assault) battalions were created. New battalions were seen joining their ranks as a symbol of loyalty to the Motherland.

The realization of the political function of the strike units came to light when they were successfully used by the command to eliminate several serious military rebellions. In particular, on the Romanian front, drummers neutralized the rioting units of the 163rd Infantry Division, and on the Southwestern Front, the rebellion of the 7th Siberian Army Corps was liquidated. In addition, they fought with ever-increasing desertion: for example, the battalion of “death” of the 11th army only detained 11 people in Volochisk only during the night of July 12000 (after the failure of the June offensive of the South-Western Front] [Kavtaradze A. G. The June offensive of the Russian army in 1917 // Militaryhistorical magazine. 1967. No. 5. P. 27].

But the shock units were for the most part destroyed in the June offensive and subsequently could not contribute to the restoration of order in Russia.

At the same time, the isolation of the most healthy elements from the army, with their presence in special units, accelerated the process of the collapse of the current army.

In general, the shock battalions stood out for their high fighting spirit and good technical equipment. Special attention was paid to the formation of adhesions between the fighters of the unit, the development of a sense of mutual gain, strength of character, physical and moral endurance, education in the spirit of sacrificial service to the revolutionary Motherland. Close attention was paid to the material support of the fighters. For example, the Military Log of the 279 Infantry Lokhvitsky Regiment (the “death” regiment), when describing daily events, specifically mentions that meat soup was issued twice a day - for lunch and dinner [RGVIA. F. 2890. Op. 1. D. 65].

The increase in the number of shock troops led to the inevitable decline in their quality. So, gradually 4 corps (Guards Horse, 2 Guards, 6 and 7 Horse, 5 divisions, 32 regiment, and 53 battalion, several artillery brigades and divisions, and a number of companies, squadrons and batteries. In accordance with the order number 759 from 05. 08. 1917 of the shock regiments, artillery brigades and divisions numbered 73, and battalions, companies, squadrons and batteries - 168.

The main combat task of the shock units was to inspire with their example the soldiers mass in the name of the successful end of the war - during the last offensive of the Russian army in the field.

Despite all the efforts of the command to structure the shock units, in particular, by delimiting the shock, assault and "death" units from the revolutionary battalions, this was not fully accomplished. Thus, in the list of shock battalions of the South-Western Front, the proportion of the latter is very high.

List of shock battalions of the South-Western Front:
The 1 Revolutionary Shock Battalion, Freedom, Equality and Brotherhood;
1-th Orenburg Revolutionary Battalion;
1 Vuchachsky Lyson Heights battalion;
1 th Revolutionary Shock Regiment;
1-th Consolidated March Battalion;
1-th Omsk revolutionary battalion;
2-th Orenburg Revolutionary Battalion;
4-th revolutionary shock guerrilla battalion;
5-th revolutionary shock guerrilla battalion;
6-th Mariupol Revolutionary Shock Battalion;
7 Novonikolaevsky Revolutionary Shock Battalion;
8 Amur Revolutionary Shock Battalion;
9-th Zaamursky revolutionary shock battalion;
10 Siberian Revolutionary Shock Battalion
[RGVIA. F. 2992. Op. 1. D. 42. L. 152 about; RGVIA. F. 2620. Op. 2. D. 68. L. 323 Rev.].

As a result, structural confusion led to the fact that in accordance with the Order of the Chief Executive Officer No. 547 from 27. 06. The 1917, along with the shock formations, had separate shock battalions, as well as battalions and companies of “death” in the structure of infantry regiments and divisions (if the latter were not entirely shock). Moreover, in special cases, companies could temporarily be reduced to battalions in their divisions, but it was allowed to single out no more than a company from each regiment.


15. Petrograd. Record volunteers in the shock battalion.

Thus, in the spring of 1917, the term “shock” was synonymous with “assault”, combining the tactical features of the actions of the respective units, then the concept of “shock” was later understood as the honorary name of the unit, since actions that were not assault (that is, not specifically intended to break through and capture enemy lines and fortified areas). Officially, as already noted, the shock parts and parts of the "death" were equated. Moreover, sometimes assault battalions (for example, the assault battalion of the 28 Infantry Division) also declared themselves to be parts of "death."

By October, there were 313 different formations of "death", which included more than 600 thousand people - and the formation of the "death army" was discussed in military circles [Solntseva S. A. Decree. cit. C. 50]. This could actually be a successful prerequisite for the struggle of Russia together with the Allies in the Entente to the bitter end, even in the conditions of demobilization of the main part of the Army in the field.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    16 March 2017 06: 40
    The further fate of the people who served in the shock battalions, those who survived the June offensive, of course, is interesting. Did everyone go to the Volunteer Army?
  2. +19
    16 March 2017 07: 38
    “In fact, this could have been a successful prerequisite for the struggle of Russia together with the Allies on the Entente to a victorious end, even in conditions of the demobilization of the bulk of the army.”
    That’s the answer Russia could fight to the end
  3. +3
    16 March 2017 07: 50
    First, it was necessary to decompose the army, by order No. 1, and then having the deployed units, form "shock battalions" ...
  4. +18
    16 March 2017 08: 10
    What to do if such power came to Russia at this time. But Barcid is probably theoretically right: the army of death, cavalry, artillery, part of the infantry are normal troops of the veil. Even having dismissed the main crowds home, it was possible to keep the front on November 18. Although - with the preservation of the Eastern Front, the war would have ended even earlier.
  5. +14
    16 March 2017 08: 49
    By October, there were 313 different formations of "death", which included more than 600 thousand people - and in military circles the formation of the “army of death” was discussed


    For these normal citizens of Russia, there was no question of an "imperialist" war and its transformation into a "civil war."

    They knew that they were fighting with the invaders and the terrible mortal enemy of Russia: it was NECESSARY to defeat him in order to end the world wars forever.

    They fought to ensure that June 22, 1941 never happened. And they did everything they could. Honor and glory to them.

    And those who scoffed at them and thought that he had been saved and would now heal, then received in full.
    1. +5
      16 March 2017 15: 54
      Quote: Olgovich
      And those who scoffed at them and thought that he had been saved and would now heal, then received in full.

      Considering that the bulk of the army was from peasants, you are right. Then began dispossession, collectivization, the suppression of peasant riots, famines ..... in general sipped from the Bolsheviks in full. How not to remember Lyuba’s song "Kazan Orphan" "... grandfather died in civilian life - lucky!"
  6. 0
    16 March 2017 12: 42
    Quote: Olgovich
    They fought to ensure that June 22, 1941 never happened. And they did everything they could. Honor and glory to them.

    How does the date 22.06.41 depend on whether Russia would participate in the WWII until the end, or not?
    What if Russia was present at Versailles, Germany would be less humiliated and, accordingly, a food base for ghouls like Hitler would not have formed?
    1. +7
      16 March 2017 13: 06
      Quote: Moore
      How does the date 22.06.41 depend on whether Russia would participate in the WWII until the end, or not?

      The most direct: it was FORBIDDEN ARMED by Germany to arm themselves, and the victorious powers were the guarantors of this decision. . In fact, France alone tried to do this (to no avail). The Bolsheviks made Russia an outcast country and deprived of her right participation in the development and implementation of a system of peace and the right to control the armament of Germany and prevent it. Russia would never allow it. And without Russia, there is no peace in Europe. The result is WWII.

      The evidence is there: after WWII, Russia (USSR) participated in the development and implementation of the system of peace and the Third MV no.

      So, fighting against Germany in 1917, the drummers fought against WWII.
      1. 0
        16 March 2017 15: 40
        For your information, a conference at which representatives of the Entente countries agreed to delimit zones of influence on the territory of their former ally of the Russian Empire was held even before the negotiations in Brest. That is, the intervention would happen regardless of the position of the Republic of Ingushetia in relation to its responsibilities in the bloc.
        1. +1
          16 March 2017 16: 05
          Quote: strannik1985
          For your information, a conference at which representatives of the Entente countries agreed to delimit zones of influence on the territory of their former ally of the Russian Empire was held even before the negotiations in Brest.

          but more precisely the date can not be called? It seems to me that this happened much later than the abdication of the king and the coming to power of the EaP.
        2. +3
          16 March 2017 20: 11
          Quote: strannik1985
          For your information, a conference at which representatives of the Entente countries agreed on the demarcation of zones of influence on the territory of their former ally of the Russian Empire was carried out before the negotiations in Brest.


          For reference, AFTER the arrival of the Bolsheviks and a stupid decree on peace, the Allies had to think something.
          1. 0
            17 March 2017 06: 57
            The reasons for this or that action can be objective or biased. Regardless of the wishes of the Bolsheviks, the Republic of Ingushetia no longer has the army, it is ruined by the actions of the Provisional Government and the Petrosoviet, the Red Guard is just being created, the Bolsheviks simply have nothing to fight. It is trite that the soldiers and peasants, dissatisfied with the decisions of the authorities, do not dare to have a new, not yet strengthened power, they have to flow, decrees on peace and land.
            To negotiate with the Bolsheviks, to provide assistance, assistance? What for? The war is already drawing to a close, the former ally is no longer needed, you do not need to fulfill these promises, you can rob, or even divide a potential rival into several warring countries.
            1. +4
              17 March 2017 08: 47
              Quote: strannik1985
              The reasons for this or that action can be objective or biased. Regardless of the wishes of the Bolsheviks, RI no longer has an army; it is ruined by the actions of the Provisional Government and the Petrosoviet


              Have you read the article? Hundreds of thousands of normal soldiers and officers and not all died.
              The army still WAS, and there was a veil, it was the Bolsheviks who committed themselves to demobilizing the army in Brest.

              The Germans were in a much worse situation - 800 thousand bodies from starvation, America in the war is the end. They simply did not have the strength to occupy Russia.

              Concluding Brest, the Bolsheviks saved their usurped power, and not the country.
              1. 0
                17 March 2017 16: 41
                I read, but do you understand what you read? These are parts of qualitative reinforcement, they are scattered on all fronts, in the offensive they should be given to divisions and corps to support the attack. Sense of the battalion, if the division on its site refused to advance? Sense from the battalion, if during a counterattack the unit defending the front decides to make legs? Yes, what can I think, see the b / d move in the summer of 1917. This is the first.
                The second one. Who are the Bolsheviks to command these units? Anyone, but not a legitimate authority, and he is not obliged to obey it, he can decide as he wants.
      2. +2
        17 March 2017 07: 22
        Quote: Olgovich
        The Bolsheviks made Russia an outcast country and deprived it of the right to participate in the development and implementation of the peace system and the right to control German arms and prevent it. Russia would never allow it. And without Russia, there is no peace in Europe. The result is WWII.

        Strongly Russia- "outcast" was able to prevent the WWII?
        With its dependence on external loans and the king, which at that time God sent? Where would the dependence of RI on creditors after the victory go?
        Someone listened to our magnanimous Nicholas II, when in 1898 he proposed to convene a world conference to limit the growth of arms? Yeah, they were surprised at the insolence, frowned, threatened the elven monarch with a finger and began to arm themselves with double speed.
        Well, what would change after a victory?
        1. +4
          17 March 2017 08: 27
          Quote: Moore
          Strongly Russia- "outcast" was able to prevent the WWII?


          Before this war, there was no peace system.
          After this-was-read the documents of the League of Nations-the world at all times.

          BUT Russia was not there (initially), as in Versailles. The result is WWII.

          Russia participates in the system of world order-Third World-NO.

          this is a fact, dear ..

          Someone listened to our magnanimous Nicholas II, when in 1898 he proposed to convene a world conference to limit the growth of arms? Yeah, they were surprised at the insolence, frowned, threatened the elven monarch with a finger and began to arm themselves with double speed.

          ALL countries of the world gathered and listened and adopted a lot of conventions., Valid until now.
          And the wording was included in the UN Charter.
    2. +3
      16 March 2017 15: 59
      Quote: Moore
      What if Russia was present at Versailles, Germany would be less humiliated and, accordingly, a food base for ghouls like Hitler would not have formed?

      Yes you are right. The same thing happened in 1815, when Russia did not allow France to rip up and much later, in 1945, when the USSR tempered the appetites of the allies for ripping up Germany. Yes, and there would have been no co-operation between the USSR and Nazi Germany, against the background of the world isolation of our country by the captains.
      1. +1
        17 March 2017 07: 43
        Quote: veteran66
        Yes you are right. The same thing happened in 1815,

        IMHO, Russia in 1917 was somewhat different in its influence from Russia-1815, and even less so from the USSR-1945.
        Somewhere I came across the phrase of a French diplomat in WWI, now I can’t find it. Something like how French youth can be compared - the elite of the nation with the Russian uneducated cattle cattle. This is about the demand of the Russian side to bear the same military load.
        It seems that this was neither impossible in 1815, much less in 1945.
        1. +3
          17 March 2017 07: 50
          Quote: Moore
          Something like how French youth can be compared - the elite of the nation with the Russian uneducated cattle cattle.

          it’s hard to disagree with you, given the state of the Republic of Ingushetia at that time, but if it were a victory, then the opinion would be different.
  7. +5
    16 March 2017 14: 11
    always bitter from reading such materials and from the thought of how many quality people were wasted
  8. +8
    16 March 2017 16: 24
    That is, a normal army was formed in Russia, the soldiers of which fully realized their duty to the Motherland and were well trained and prepared for military operations.