The last attempt to save the empire of the Romanovs

109
The last attempt to save the empire of the Romanovs The program of P. A. Stolypin was not exhausted by the fundamental reforms of the Russian countryside. Of great importance were measures aimed at improving the living standards of workers and the introduction of state insurance. For Stolypin it was very important that when he got from the village to the city, the worker would immediately fall into a normal environment and settle in it. Therefore, much attention was paid to measures aimed at improving the welfare of workers, to protect their rights, so that there would be no harassment from employers.

As a result, many skilled workers then recalled the years before the war as blessed times. Thus arose the myth of the wonderful life of the working class “with the king” (it concerned the skilled, small number of this class).



Pyotr Arkadyevich also worked on the reform of local self-government, the reform of the judicial system, the development of the zemstvos in the western provinces. All of them were aimed at protecting the personal rights of citizens, their property. Citizens of the Russian Empire received the right to defend their opinions, their rights, property. These reforms included laws on freedom of religion and personal integrity, on the abolition of restrictions on rights for certain categories of citizens. In fact, freedom of faith was proclaimed, which was of great importance for Russia, where the Old Believers were oppressed and Jews were restricted.

Stolypin understood that these two separate "worlds" - the Old Believers and the Jews, threaten to blow up the country. In particular, many young Jews who were infringed on their rights went to revolutionary parties, and their percentage among the revolutionaries was very high. As Stolypin himself noted: “... it is necessary to raise the question of the abolition in law of some almost unnecessary restrictions on Jews, who particularly annoy the Jewish population of Russia and, without making any real benefit to the Russian population, [...] only nourish the Jewish revolutionary mood masses ”(Kokovtsov V.N. From my past. Memoirs of 1903 — 1919. Kn. 1. - M .: Nauka, 1992). The Old Believers were in a similar situation, who with hard work created national capital and financed the revolutionary movement in the country.

Thus, Stolypin wanted to “pacify” two social groups that were revolutionary in their attitude towards the Romanov empire. To direct their enormous energy, accumulated over a long time, to a constructive, peaceful course, and not to the revolution, as happened in reality.

In addition, Stolypin tried to destroy the "springboard of the revolution" in Finland and Russify the Grand Duchy, to make part of a single empire. The Grand Duchy of Finland was a special region of the Russian Empire and had a wide autonomy from the central government, which was used by revolutionaries. Stolypin marked 5 in May 1908: “revolutionaries who crossed the border found themselves in Finland, in the territory of the Russian empire, the most reliable shelter, much more reliable than in neighboring states, which willingly come to the aid of our Russian the police. ” In 1908, he ensured that Finnish matters affecting the interests of Russia were dealt with in the Council of Ministers. 17 June 1910, Tsar Nicholas II approved the law “On the procedure for issuing laws and decrees of national importance relating to Finland” developed by the Stolypin government, which significantly reduced the Finnish autonomy and strengthened the role of the central government in Finland.

Thus, the most important affairs of Stolypin in domestic policy became the agrarian reform, a complex of reforms that were supposed to remove internal social and national contradictions, establish civil peace, strengthen the Russification of national suburbs. In the center of all reforms was the agrarian reform, which was supposed to solve the main and old problem of Russia - the peasant question. Stolypin understood that without a radical revolution in the peasant mass (the main part of the empire's population), mainly the carrier of the Russian “matrix” culture, the Romanov empire could not be saved, it could not be returned to its own civilizational path (the project of Holy Russia, Grada Kitezh). Peasants should be interested in the development of the empire, which will give Russia a new impetus in politics, culture and economy.

Stolypin also showed an understanding of the Great Game. He was the main opponent of the union of Russia with France, and especially England, our long-time enemy. Peter Arkadyevich understood that the interests of Russia and England diverged in the most fundamental way. The British were our main geopolitical adversaries both in Europe and in Asia, constantly setting neighbors on us. They often used the Russians as "cannon fodder", solving their strategic tasks. In particular, during the wars with Napoleon. At the beginning of the XX century, the British tried to pit the Russians with the Germans. The German Empire, showing amazing results in the development of the economy and the armed forces (especially fleet), challenged the British Empire. German goods were crowded with English around the world, and the German fleet in the future could become stronger than the British. In London, they feared that Germany would lead Europe. Therefore, England began to support the anti-German attitude of France, which longed for revenge for the defeat of 1870-1871. And France had an alliance agreement with Russia. With the alliance of the Russians with the British and French, the collapse of Europe into two hostile blocs and a serious clash between them became inevitable. Thus, Western Europe quickly went to a big war.

Russia in its condition to get involved in such a war was categorically impossible. It was much more reasonable to find a common language with Germany. The German Empire was our most important trading partner, the market for agricultural products and the source of technology, equipment and machinery. In addition, Berlin during the clash between Russia and Japan clearly showed signs of attention, showed readiness for friendship and a strategic alliance. This axis, Berlin - Petersburg, solved the most important strategic tasks. Firstly, it was more difficult for Britain and France to unleash a big war. Having lost the Russian “cannon fodder”, French and British strategists thought a hundred times whether it was worth starting a war with a powerful Second Reich?

Secondly, Russia received a powerful rear in Western Europe and could take on internal problems and affairs in the East. If the Russian Empire had avoided the trap of a big war, it would have won the time Stolypin talked about: “Give the 20 state years of peace, both internal and external, and you will not recognize present-day Russia.”

Thus, Peter Arkadyevich was a tough supporter of the peaceful line in foreign policy. Russia should have avoided getting involved in big conflicts, gaining time for internal strengthening and transformation, engaging in the suppression of the virus of the revolution, its economy and population. Considering the burden of the problems accumulated during the reign of the Romanovs, a big war for the empire was suicide. Stolypin understood this very well. As well as the desire of the masters of the West at any price to draw Russia into such a war, confront the German Empire, and solve their problems at the expense of the Russians and Germans, destroy the main geopolitical rivals.

In the summer of 1911, Stolypin propitiously remarked: “... England ... considering itself the first power of the world and striving to always play the first violin in an international concert, no doubt, fears that Russia, constantly improving its economic and military situation, does not prevent to her in her colonial politics. Most of all, Britain fears that Russia does not penetrate into India, although Russia has no desire to seize India ... England cannot but feel that the exploitation of countries like India and others may end sooner or later, and then it will not only not will play the first violin ... but will cease to be the great empire that is at this time. therefore England hates Russia more than anyone and will sincerely rejoice if the monarchy falls in Russia some day, and Russia itself will no longer be a great state and will fall into a whole number of independent republics ... There is neither love, nor respect in France for Russia, but at the same time France, hating and fearing Germany, quite naturally seeks to be associated with Russia by military alliances and treaties ”(S. Rybas. Stolypin. M., 2009) .

Everything will happen, as Peter Arkadyevich suggested. In the First World War, our "partners" - the British and French, will use the Russians as "cannon fodder", fight the Germans "until the last Russian soldier." When there is a strategic turnaround in the war, the French and British, who from the very beginning were not going to share the fruits of the common victory with Russia, will support the revolutionary impulse of the top of the Russian Empire (the “feminists”), who will overthrow the autocracy. Then the Western "allies" will support the collapse of the Russian state to the mass of the new "independent" states in 1917-1918, and only the Bolsheviks will thwart the plans of the Western masters for the complete disintegration and destruction of Russian civilization.

Therefore, Stolypin advocated a sensible alliance with Germany, so that Russia, keeping its position in the West, would internally strengthen and go to the East, where they could sell their goods. The scope for activity was enormous - Persia, Mongolia, Korea, China, Japan, etc. Stolypin was a supporter of the Russian national policy on the world stage. He did not want the Russians to be used as “cannon fodder”.

However, the last attempt to save the Romanov empire failed. Stolypin had no historical time, he was disturbed by both revolutionaries, liberals, masons, and conservatives. And most importantly - Peter Arkadyevich spoke out against the very logic of the development of the “Third Rome” project. He tried to save a society that could not, and did not want to be saved. Moreover, the main driving forces of the empire - the pro-Western ruling elite (political, military, administrative, financial and industrial elite), the Russian bourgeoisie, both pro-Western and national (Old Believers), the liberal intelligentsia, the peasantry, revolutionaries and nationalists of all stripes, opposed autocracy. Stolypin in Russia acted as "one soldier in the field." He did a lot, but could not save the empire.

Peter Stolypin could still delay the inevitable for some time. For this it was necessary to keep the Russian Empire from entering the war against Germany. It was a chance. However, the masters of the West also saw and understood everything perfectly. Stolypin eliminated. They tried to kill him more than once, but fate kept the great Russian statesman. 1 September 1911 of the year, a mortal terrorist wounded Stolypin. September 4 Peter Arkadevich died.

To be continued ...
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 November 2016 07: 09
    Everything is so inevitable that even hang yourself.
    1. +3
      22 November 2016 07: 28
      If he didn’t go to Kuev, he would live, but live.
      1. +7
        22 November 2016 09: 06
        Quote: siberalt
        If he didn’t go to Kuev, he would live, but live.

        Not a fact, read how many attempts have been on him before (number). Not a single dignitary of RI attempted to kill so many times. Moreover, in terms of his status, he was obliged to attend there! Where the king is, there is the boyars.
        1. Cat
          +5
          22 November 2016 20: 12
          It is rare that anyone from the entourage of Nicholas II feels sorry, but Stolypin is sincerely sorry. What was his unwillingness to war worth!
      2. +10
        22 November 2016 10: 06
        Quote: siberalt
        If he didn’t go to Kuev, he would live, but live.

        Well, it would happen later. It is generally accepted that the Bolsheviks are to blame for the death of Stolypin, but this is not so. Against him were people from higher noble circles. Lenin once said that if Stolypin carried out the reform, the revolution would not be needed. He had too many enemies, in all walks of life.
        1. 0
          22 November 2016 17: 13
          And who have these enemies?
          In the article “Plagiarism or recognition? The Israelis are preparing a coup d'etat in Russia, ”the newspaper“ President ”wrote about how the founder and first chief editor of the newspaper Kommersant, Vladimir Yakovlev, published on his Facebook page an entry in which he prophesied that a large-scale state crisis would happen in Russia in the fall:
          “WITHOUT JOKING ... I am sure that in the very near future - weeks, months - one of two scenarios is ahead. Or - a change of power with completely unpredictable and dangerous consequences. Or - the worst social crisis with street crime, lack of the most necessary and real danger to the life and health of citizens. Therefore, without any jokes: If you can, LEAVE AND, MOST IMPORTANT, ABOUT CHILDREN ".http: //politobzor.net/show-113589-vtoroy-r
          az-za-osen-sion-provociruet-gosperevorot-v-rossii
          .html
          1. +1
            22 November 2016 17: 52
            And why write it? For a long time all sorts of messages on this subject. Well, about 5 years, probably.
        2. +4
          22 November 2016 23: 21
          Quote: Wend
          Lenin once said that if Stolypin carried out the reform, the revolution would not be needed.

          Do not tell people, Lenin could not say that, because the society that Stolypin wanted to build can be described with the words "Cain XVIII" (there was such a film in Soviet times): "In my society, everyone will be rich, except the poor." Stolypin just contributed to the destruction of the peasant community, relying on the kulaks, he contributed to the enrichment of the rich and the ruin of the poor.
          1. 0
            23 November 2016 09: 15
            Quote: Alexander Green
            Stolypin just contributed to the destruction of the peasant community, betting on kulaks, he contributed to the enrichment of the rich and the ruin of the poor.
            ... and agricultural productivity growth ...
            The development of productive forces and, as a consequence, the change of production relations. More efficient management in one word.
            1. Lem
              +2
              23 November 2016 12: 48
              Pyotr Arkadievich, belonged to the type of leaders who, according to the figurative expression of Yu.V. Andropova: "They don't know the country in which they live." For some reason, he believed that "Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism" would take root on Russian soil. But no:
              “It was not for nothing that the Germans were indignant at the lack of culture of our peasant, the impossibility of instilling in him the aforementioned bourgeois virtues by any means. is it not the same in the end hides under the skin of every Russian intellectual and in general a Russian person "(Metropolitan Sergius)

              Here is his ignorance of the country in which he lives and led to the demolition of the monarchy in the 17th.

              Well, the Stalinist mobilization based on "nationalized land, nationalized industry and nationalized credit" showed a more effective economic system in Russia.
              1. +1
                23 November 2016 13: 33
                Quote: Lem
                Stalin’s mobilization based on

                Stalin himself. He was gone and the system slowly, but went downhill.
                1. Lem
                  +2
                  23 November 2016 15: 47
                  In fact, it (industrialization) relied on Ilyich, because. "nationalized land ... industry ..." - this is his parting word. And although the system went downhill (in fact, how it is gritting, regardless of the reasons), however, the ideas of freedom, equality and brotherhood have not disappeared, and the re-Sovietization of society, as they say, is a medical fact.
                  1. 0
                    23 November 2016 16: 06
                    Quote: Lem
                    this is his parting word

                    Parting words and implementation are not the same thing.
                    Quote: Lem
                    re-Sovietization of society, as they say - a medical fact

                    What is the fact? Yes, now they began to recall that in the USSR there was not continuous darkness and horror, this is really a fact, but one more attempt to build a utopia - thanks is not necessary.
      3. +1
        22 November 2016 10: 47
        If he didn’t go to Kuev, he would live, but live.

        No chance. PEOPLE WORKED, UNDERSTANDING!
  2. +6
    22 November 2016 07: 37
    Stolypin tried to save a society that did not want to be saved.
    1. +4
      22 November 2016 09: 40
      I’d even strengthen it - I wanted to save the king, who didn’t want to be saved, but simply killed the rescuer
      1. +10
        22 November 2016 09: 46
        Unproven accusation. Tsar Stolypin was needed; there was no reason to organize the murder.
        1. +8
          22 November 2016 11: 59
          Nikolashka was a rag and henpecked. And Stolypin was not needed for his entourage; he took the reforms too abruptly.
      2. +2
        22 November 2016 20: 51
        Roman66, did you see how Nikolai killed Stolypin? One must read the documents and D
  3. +2
    22 November 2016 07: 40
    Therefore, Stolypin advocated a sensible alliance with Germany,

    I’m afraid such an alliance would be fragile anyway. Really very Germans need resources ...
    1. +6
      22 November 2016 11: 31
      Quote: Moore
      I'm afraid such an alliance would be unstable anyway.


      He was impossible in principle.
      The Germans followed living space in the East already in 1914 year.
      The author would get out of his parallel reality about reading WHAT they write the Germans themselves about his plans for the WWI. And by growing economically and demographically (approximately 10 million overpopulation), they were the most ambitious.

      By the way, Friedrich Ratzel (1844-1904) coined this term about space "back in his scientific works" Political Geography "(1897) and" Living Space "(1901) long before Hitler.

      The term was taken up by the "Popular Movement" (Völkische Bevegung) and the All-German Union (German Alldeutscher Verband). Deemed necessary space for “all-German” oriented “settlement policy on a large scale". For this, it was not the extra-European colonies that were considered, but “the East directly bordering the German Fatherland. Fate leads us there. The German compass points to the east! ”

      But the fact that the GERMANS write about their plans in Russia in the PRC:
      In the "September program of the German Reichskanler Bethmann-Hollweg" August Thyssen, the owner of the steel works, demanded the expansion of the German sphere of influence in the east to the Crimea and to the Caucasus in order to "be able by land to reach Asia Minor and Persia" . It is the Caucasus that "with regard to its significant reserves of iron ore, is necessary for Germany." Heinrich Klass, influential chairman of the right-wing extremist "Pan-German Union": "Cast aside Russia to the borders of the times of Peter the Great." The local population must leave the annexed areas and give way to German settlers. http://www.zeit.de/zeit-geschichte/2015/03/erster
      -weltkrieg-krim-ostexpansion-paul-von-hindenburg /
      komplettansicht
      It was meant to throw 7 millon for the Dnieper, part Germanize. In the Baltics, they managed to start it.

      In May, 1914, the head of the General Staff Helmut von Moltke, said that in two or three years Russia would arm, And then Germany would no longer be able to resist a triple alliance consisting of France, the United Kingdom and Russia. Therefore, nothing else remains "How to start a preventive war and smash the enemy, while we are still able to withstand this fight to a certain extent».

      The Reich Chancellor Theobald von Betman-Golweg on the Serbian ultimaum: "Actions against Serbia could lead to a world war." But "The future belongs to Russia, which is growing and growing, and which is putting more and more pressure on us, like some kind of dark spirit».

      And they decided to go to war while they had (they thought) chances.

      The author would still familiarize himself with the Schlieffen Plan, destroyed by Russia, which thereby saved itself from the situation of 1941.

      There was no chance to avoid war.

      The Russian leadership has acted extremely wisely in this situation.by securing yourself allies on the eve of imminent war, while saving France in August 1914, provided a situation when the first German strike on France did not become an intermediate one before a strike on Russia (as in 1940-1941). He remained in the West. The brunt of the war and the losses now fell on the shoulders of the Allies. Thereby were saved millions of lives of Russian soldiers

      The Second World War.
      President of Russia: "How the Second World War differs from the First is, in fact, not clear. [b] There really is NO difference "[/ b]
      With what I agree.
      1. +1
        22 November 2016 14: 45
        Yes, very wisely acted, entered the war and ravaged the empire because of Nikolas and his camarilla! And all countries worked out strategic plans! World War I could have been avoided
        topwar.ru ›1455-pervoj-mirovoj-vojny ... izbezhat.html
      2. 0
        22 November 2016 15: 07
        Quote: Aleksander
        In the "September program of the German Reichskanler Bethmann-Hollweg" August Thyssen, the owner of steel enterprises, demanded the expansion of the German sphere of influence in the east to the Crimea and the Caucasus in order to "be able to get by land to Asia Minor and Persia." its significant reserves of iron ore are essential for Germany. "

        Khm ... that is, the railway Berlin-Vienna-Istanbul-Baghdad-Basra-Kuwait (with all its charms such as improving the infrastructure of Turkey in the Caucasian theater of operations) was not enough for them?
        In its future finished form, the road will enable German industry to flood Asia Minor, Syria and Mesopotamia with its products, and, at the end of the Baghdad - Khanekin - Tehran line, also Persia. The political significance of the road for Germany lies in the strengthening and revival of Turkey, which inevitably should entail the passage of a railway line across the country from Constantinople to the Persian Gulf with branches in all directions. Strengthening Turkey and especially its military power is one of the main tasks of German policy in recent years, aimed at attracting the Ottoman Empire to the Triple Alliance.

        But Russia even in the end agreed to its construction (Potsdam Agreement).
        1. +2
          22 November 2016 20: 09
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Khm ... that is, the railway Berlin-Vienna-Istanbul-Baghdad-Basra-Kuwait (with all its charms such as improving the infrastructure of Turkey in the Caucasian theater of operations) was not enough for them?


          Of course, a little! That's what they write about it the Germans themselves today (http://www.zeit.de/zeit-geschichte/2015/03/erste
          r
          -weltkrieg-krim-ostexpansion-paul-von-hindenburg /
          komplettansicht :)

          German expansion in the east during World War I and also imposed Brest-Litovsk Treaty turned out to be just separate episodes, but they had far-reaching consequences. “In a certain sense,” as Sebastian Haffner rightly noted in his book From Bismarck to Hitler (Von Bismarck zu Hitler), “it was that eastern empireto the creation of which later sought Hitler, and she already once was within reach of the Germans. "

          Therefore, the National Socialists could easily use those negative clichés regarding the barbaric, uncivilized East, which with the help of military propaganda since 1914, were driven into the heads of German officers and soldiers. From Ludendorff’s plans for domination in the occupied territories and the racist "selection" of the population, there is a straight line to the program formulated by Hitler in the middle of the 20-s conquest of "living space in the east" and to try to realize these plans during the war of extermination against the Soviet Union, which began in June 1941.
          [/B]

          So the Second World War, only the continuation of the fact that the Germans started in the PRC ......
          1. +2
            23 November 2016 10: 14
            Quote: Aleksander
            So the Second World War, only the continuation of the fact that the Germans started in the PRC ......

            So WWII as a whole - too ... Marshal Foch was right.
      3. Alf
        +1
        22 November 2016 19: 36
        Quote: Aleksander
        President of Russia: "How the Second World War differs from the First is, in fact, incomprehensible. There really is NO difference "

        The First World War was a fight between the capitalists on the subject-Who will take the territory from whom and the opportunity to "master" it. The Second World War was a war of all the capitalists of the world against the first socialist state. The president is ashamed not to know this and blurt out like that!
        1. +2
          22 November 2016 23: 04
          Quote: Alf
          The Second World War was the war of all the capitalists of the world against the first socialist state.

          Any war is a war for resources. But socialism or what’s the matter of the tenth.
        2. +1
          23 November 2016 06: 22
          Quote: Alf
          The First World War was a fight between the capitalists on the subject-Who will take the territory from whom and the opportunity to "master it

          Yes, but the Patriotic War of the 1812 of the year was a fight of feudal lords on the subject-Who will squeeze the territory from whom and the opportunity to "master it". Yes?
          And the battle of Poltava, too, on the subject-Who will squeeze the territory from whom and the opportunity to "master it"
          Quote: Alf
          It’s a shame for the president not to know this and blurt out like that!


          It's a shame to blurt out like your opus. You are given plans the German invaders themselves on WWII and WWII in relation to Russia, not much different from each other.

          Read not the tales of Samsonov, but the real primary sources of the Germans themselves
        3. +2
          23 November 2016 10: 42
          Quote: Alf
          The Second World War was the war of all the capitalists of the world against the first socialist state.

          And what socialist state was subjected to aggression at the beginning of World War II? wink
          World War II was a "continuation war."
          This is not the world. This is a truce for 20 years.
          © Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in France, Marshal Foch
        4. 0
          25 November 2016 00: 22
          DO NOT SPEED THE PRESIDENT AND DO NOT SIMPLIFY THE HISTORY, DEAR!
    2. +1
      22 November 2016 12: 59
      Quote: Moore
      I’m afraid such an alliance would be fragile anyway. Really very Germans need resources ...

      Duc ... in 1913, a "rye war" began with Germany.
      An explanatory note to the report of the State Audit Office on the execution of the 1912 painting noted an increase in the import of rye to us from Germany.
      ... over the past year, the import of rye almost doubled the import of 1912 and the average for 1908-1912. This phenomenon is due to our lack of taxation of this bread, as well as the establishment by Germany of export bonuses for bread in the form of a refund of duties. Importing bread from abroad with sufficient growth within the Empire seems all the more undesirable because the vast majority of it is ground in mills located in border areas, and bran is exported back to Germany, while flour is sold to consumer markets inside the country. Thus, the import of grain from Germany is essentially the import of flour in a form that allows the German importer to avoid paying a high duty on flour. In order to eliminate these undesirable phenomena, the Highest Law was approved on May 1, 1914 on the imposition of customs duties on imported bread.
  4. +2
    22 November 2016 07: 57
    Stolypin wanted to "pacify" two social groups
    ... Well, yes, two social groups, Jews and Old Believers, kicked the "community" to revolution, the "community" did not want it, but they kicked it .. they say, get up, working people .. And people: I am satisfied with the ransom payments since 1861. .and everything else .. Do not embarrass me Jews and Old Believers .., otherwise I’ll rise .. According to the author, there are cookies, there is a revolution, there are no cookies, there is no revolution ... And the main thing in this must be someone to blame .. what social groups .. And so, judging by the articles, the author throws in different directions, rushes .. tries to figure out who is to blame and what to do ..
    1. +4
      22 November 2016 08: 36
      According to the studies of V. Zhuravlev, as of the 1907 year, among the Bolsheviks there were up to 78% of Russians and Ukrainians, 11% of Jews, as of the 1917 year, about 50% of Russians, 20% of Ukrainians, 20% of Jews and 10% of others. a large percentage of Jews was also characteristic of a number of other opposition parties. Among the Mensheviks for 1907, there were 34% of Russians, 29% of Georgians, 23% of Jews. Researcher Krivenky V.V. counts among anarchists as of 1905 — 1907 years 50% of Jews and 41% of Russians (see also Political Parties of Russia in the 1917 year). At the same time, among the Cadets, Russians made up 88%, Jews - 6%.
      1. +5
        22 November 2016 08: 53
        Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
        as of 1907, among the Bolsheviks, there were up to 78% of Russians and Ukrainians, 11% of Jews,

        Google the ethnic composition of the delegates to the 1st Congress of the RSDLP (Minsk, 1898). There seemed to be only two Russian delegates, the rest were "the chosen people." Ie the proportion was like the opposite.
        1. +5
          22 November 2016 09: 15
          The 1st Congress of the RSDLP generally organized and paid for the Jewish Workers' Union-Bund, so nothing strange.
        2. +4
          22 November 2016 10: 57
          Which passed illegally and where there were as many as 9 (NINE, CARL!) People. The congress worked out neither the program nor the rules of the party. A few weeks later, all but one of the participants in the congress were arrested - thus, no real party was created at this congress. That is, in fact, the first congress was the one that took place in London. And the second is there. And this does not in the least confuse those Bolsheviks who shout here "LENIN SPAS RUSSIA !! 1"
          1. +1
            22 November 2016 14: 32
            Zmicerz well, if the mediocre Nikolashka, while the raven shot, dragged out Russia, someone had to save lol !
            1. +4
              22 November 2016 14: 48
              Quote: Uncle Murzik
              while the raven shot it trailed Russia, someone had to save lol!

              Only Jews with Georgians can save Russia .... And how it existed for centuries without bronchteins and dzhugashvili is incomprehensible!
              1. 0
                22 November 2016 17: 21
                Well, tell me about the "Russian" Tsars of the Romanovs, the dominance of the Germans at court!
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              22 November 2016 23: 07
              Quote: Uncle Murzik
              someone had to save

              Did they save her? Most of the then revolutionaries were subsequently tried and shot.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  25 November 2016 00: 24
                  That's for sure !...
          2. 0
            22 November 2016 21: 33
            Quote: Zmicerz
            really the first congress was the one that took place in London. And the second there. And this does not bother a bit those Bolsheviks
            Edward's nestlings. laughing
        3. +1
          22 November 2016 13: 02
          It was a "constituent congress", there was no party as such.
      2. +4
        22 November 2016 10: 37
        Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
        According to the studies of V. Zhuravlev, as of the 1907 year, among the Bolsheviks there were up to 78% of Russians and Ukrainians, 11% of Jews, as of the 1917 year, about 50% of Russians, 20% of Ukrainians, 20% of Jews and 10% of others. a large percentage of Jews was also characteristic of a number of other opposition parties. Among the Mensheviks for 1907, there were 34% of Russians, 29% of Georgians, 23% of Jews. Researcher Krivenky V.V. counts among anarchists as of 1905 — 1907 years 50% of Jews and 41% of Russians (see also Political Parties of Russia in the 1917 year). At the same time, among the Cadets, Russians made up 88%, Jews - 6%.

        Well, of course...
        Well then, the SNK CEC for the most part consisted of 90% of your Jewish brothers?
        And in the Cheka, the OGPU in the leadership, they are mainly dear ...
        1. +2
          22 November 2016 13: 02
          Quote: Donhapa
          And in the Cheka, the OGPU in the leadership, they are mainly dear ...

          Not only the general percentage matters, the percentage may not be large, it just sits and rules above) 10% of the God's demons are controlled by 90% of ardent revolutionaries.
        2. +3
          22 November 2016 21: 11
          The lists are not subject to rehabilitation for the big terror-Jews!
      3. +2
        22 November 2016 20: 59
        Read Shulgin and find out that in the Cheka 2/3 of the leaders were false. By the way, the lists are not subject to rehabilitation for terror 30, all Jews
  5. +4
    22 November 2016 08: 17
    It is clear that the only one who at least somehow clearly formulated the policy of the RUSSIAN EMPIRE was Stolypin, so they are still trying to * PR * him. Imagine the squalor of the tsarist government? After all, there is nothing beyond the clever or revolutionary in domestic politics, just the observance of the rights of the owner and allowing the peasants, of course not all, but very few, to get rich. In foreign policy, only comply with the interests of RUSSIA. And that’s it. And for this he was killed. And they killed him, albeit * behind the scenes * but by * order * of the highest nobility and the king.
    This is a description of the king himself and his entourage, and of course, at least some explanation for the fact that the king was thrown off by the noble and rich, and no one wanted to protect the * autocrat *. This later, a smart lawyer with accomplices, relying on the Entente, became the head of the * temporary * and generously distributed sovereignty to all nationalists, destroying the country along the way.
    1. +1
      22 November 2016 11: 17
      I liked the fact that the article plans, actions of Stolypin.
  6. +2
    22 November 2016 08: 40
    Quote: Vasily50
    And they killed him, albeit * behind the scenes * but by * order * of the highest nobility and the king.

    Are you kidding me? Nicholas II, in your opinion, this is Dzhugashvili: "and I'll kill Kirov, that is, Stolypin!" ?! The prime minister of the empire could be removed at any time by imperial decree.
    1. +5
      22 November 2016 09: 00
      Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
      The Prime Minister of the empire could be removed at any time by imperial decree.

      "Are you kidding me?" What a joke here, my dear! Not to your liking VS Pikul with the novel "Unclean Power", with a chapter about the murder of Stolypin? Then read the corresponding chapters from the opupea "The Red Wheel" of your unforgettable red sun AI Solzhenitsin! And then give yourself, beloved, the answer: "cui prodest?"
      1. 0
        22 November 2016 11: 03
        That's exactly what I wanted to ask a question on the topic of "Unclean power", the relationship of the tsar to Stolypin. I love Pikul very much, although I read him much less than I would like. As I understand it, the personal relationship of the tsar to Stolypin was not very much .... ???
        1. Alf
          0
          22 November 2016 20: 50
          Quote: Reptiloid
          As I understand it, the king’s personal relationship with Stolypin was not very .... .... ???

          And nicholas
          personal relationships were not very
          to everyone who objected to him and had his opinion.
        2. +1
          22 November 2016 21: 01
          Dear Pikul, he had the right to fiction and then at that time they wouldn’t have published another
    2. +2
      22 November 2016 13: 05
      Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
      Are you kidding me? Nicholas II, in your opinion, this is Dzhugashvili: "and I'll kill Kirov, that is, Stolypin!" ?!

      Pffff ... in those days, secluded, now almost epic, sovereign people, employees of the Security Department, in fact, killed the Minister of Internal Affairs and the chief of the gendarmes corps V.K. Pleve, the Governor-General of Moscow Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, the Petersburg Mayor V.F. von der Launitz, the Chief Military Prosecutor V.P. Pavlov . Why is there some kind of prime minister ...
      1. +4
        22 November 2016 20: 34
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Pfff ... in those days, secluded, now almost epic, sovereign people, employees of the Security Department, actually killed the Minister of the Interior and the chief of the gendarmes corps V.K. Pleve, the Governor-General of Moscow Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, the St. Petersburg mayor V.F. von der Launitz, chief military prosecutor V.P. Pavlov. Why is there some kind of prime minister ...


        Hehe ..... Old Bolshevik tales ....
        1. +1
          22 November 2016 21: 47
          In history (and in life) it often happens that the higher ones are unbearable if clever thoughts are from the lower ones. Pride clogs the voice of reason
          .And for socialist time, that the king, that Stolypin- (or others) are all class enemies. There is no sense in raising one at the expense of the other.
        2. +2
          23 November 2016 10: 44
          Quote: Aleksander
          Old Bolshevik tales ....

          Was the director of the police department a real state councilor Lopukhin a Bolshevik? Didn't know, didn't know ... smile
  7. +3
    22 November 2016 09: 24
    Not to your liking VS Pikul with the novel "Unclean Power", with a chapter about the murder of Stolypin? Then read the corresponding chapters from the opupea "The Red Wheel" of your unforgettable red sun AI Solzhenitsin! And then give yourself, beloved, the answer: "cui prodest?"
    If you study the history of Pikul, then .... everything is very sad. From February 1916 to March 1917, the emperor appointed and removed the THREE Presidents of the Council of Ministers. Http: //rusplt.ru/sub/ratings/vitte.html
    1. +4
      22 November 2016 09: 43
      Yes, it was painfully serious force was Stolypin - not to take off at once. easier to kill. Pikul is not so bad - mistakes may have happened, but the accents are always correctly set
      1. +3
        22 November 2016 10: 04
        Pikul was a Soviet propagandist and wrote "Unclean Power" by order of the CPSU. During this period, Andropov and Yakovlev were concerned about the defeat of the so-called "Russian Party" and led an agitation campaign against it. http://www.ctvr.ru/lentad/2005/10/31/2.htm A.I. Baigushev "The Russian Party within the CPSU"
        1. +3
          22 November 2016 10: 14
          that is, you completely reject the gendarme trace in this story?
          1. +3
            22 November 2016 10: 38
            I reject the opinion of V. Pikul, whom P. Stolypin's son considered a deceitful ignorant. "..According to Pikul, when he was the governor of Grodno (1902-1903), my father's right hand was shot by a terrorist Socialist-Revolutionary. Wrong. Stolypin's right hand had a bad effect from early youth (rheumatism) ... ".http: //ldn-knigi.lib.ru/R/StolPikl.htm
            1. +2
              22 November 2016 11: 25
              Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
              I reject the opinion of V. Pikul

              Loudly and proudly declared! Did you sprinkle a lot yourself? It is in the modern era of "His Majesty of the Internet" with a high probability of "hitting" one can even talk about the number of acne in the summer of 1915 on the priest of Nicholas # 2. In the 60s-70s of the last century, the available amount of historical materials was much less, but something of the historians-fiction writers of scale B, C, Pikul is not observed on the modern literary horizon.
              1. +4
                22 November 2016 12: 52
                Quote: V.ic
                fiction historians of scale B, C, Pikul are not observed on the contemporary literary horizon.

                One fact: Pikul in the novel "amputated" the leg of Stolypin's daughter, but in reality this lady walked on two legs until her death.
                1. 0
                  22 November 2016 13: 03
                  Quote: ALEXEY VLADIMIROVICH
                  Pikul in the novel "amputated" the leg of Stolypin's daughter,

                  Yes, at least three, is that a documentary novel or is it fiction?
        2. +2
          22 November 2016 10: 52
          Well, judging by the last unfinished book of "Barborossa" I would not say that Pikul is a Soviet propagandist! hi
          1. +1
            22 November 2016 11: 15
            Quote: Uncle Murzik
            judging by the last unfinished book of "Barborossa" I would not say that Pikul was a Soviet propagandist!

            Chapters from "Barbarossa" were published in "KVS". When I read it in a book version, then ... the "taste and smell" became different, especially since the unfinished novel "The Square of the Fallen Fighters" (nee "Barbarossa" was edited by publishers like Chubais in the key they needed. Valentin Savvich by this time for a long time lay in the grave, eternal memory to him!
          2. +3
            22 November 2016 11: 57
            and indeed - propaganda is not his business. a writer based on historical facts gave his conclusions, if anyone doesn’t like them - go ahead to the desk and eclipse eclipse ...
    2. +1
      22 November 2016 10: 35
      in general, both picul and Solzhenitsyn of the same berry field are fiction writers. only the first as a writer was perhaps stronger ....
      1. +3
        22 November 2016 10: 47
        that is, a lone muzzle of Bogrov could go into a specially guarded room with weapons and calmly shoot? God have mercy, something was amiss in the Russian state!
        1. +3
          22 November 2016 11: 11
          Pikul ----- with a capital letter, and Solzhenitsyn ------ on the contrary !!!!!!!!
          1. +3
            22 November 2016 11: 31
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Pikul ----- with a capital letter, and Solzhenitsyn ------ on the contrary !!!!!!!!

            Can Salzhenitsina be called a writer?
            So, scribbler ...
        2. +1
          22 November 2016 21: 13
          And how did the loner Nikolaev enter Smolny and kill Kirov?
          1. +2
            22 November 2016 21: 43
            But Stalin ordered Kirova. And Nikolaev used blindly. This is according to Feldbin. winked
      2. +3
        22 November 2016 11: 17
        Quote: Geronimo73
        in general, then picul and Solzhenitsyn of one field of berries

        Well, "I compared my finger to .. him!" Yes, and should have written "Pikul and Solzhenitzer".
    3. The comment was deleted.
  8. +8
    22 November 2016 09: 36
    "and only the Bolsheviks will thwart the plans of the masters of the West for the complete fragmentation and destruction of Russian civilization." - sounds funny, taking into account how the Bolsheviks created and legally approved the "fraternal Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples." And now these crimes have to be corrected with blood.
  9. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 04
    If I correctly understood the idea of ​​A. Samsonov, Stolypin was killed for the implementation of the project of the City of Kitezh?
  10. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 33
    again the same snot .... how much can you already? his reforms were unsuccessful and in terms of failure. don't need this lyrics here ....
  11. +6
    22 November 2016 10: 39
    This time, Mr. Samsonov at least points to the real creators of the revolution in Russia (foreign intelligence services, Jewry and the Old Believers), and thanks for that.
    Although the comments will still start a Bolshevik howl about the "bloody rag tsar", "the outburst of the masses", "the Bolsheviks (spies and international terrorists) saved Russia", etc. etc.
    1. +3
      22 November 2016 10: 48
      well, the king is really a rag
      1. +1
        28 November 2016 20: 21
        Quote: novel xnumx
        well, the king is really a rag

        Yes, to hell with him, the king then, set the country of cancer ...
    2. +1
      22 November 2016 10: 54
      and the Bolsheviks are "shpiens"? Shaw again belay lol
      1. +2
        22 November 2016 11: 00
        And you prove that you are not spies.
        1. +3
          22 November 2016 12: 46
          I swear by my mother, an age of will not to be seen, honest pioneer, by golly ... enough is enough ??
  12. +3
    22 November 2016 10: 55
    His reforms were correct. But it was cosmetics.
    A redistribution of land was needed. Landowners became obsolete in the 20th century.
    What did they do in Western Europe after the revolutions of 1848? : do you want to own
    land - please ... just pay tax on each square meter.
    All counts, barons, monasteries immediately began to sell land (except the most
    profitable). Nothing prevented us from doing the same in Russia. Without any confiscation -
    they would have sold it themselves.
    1. +2
      22 November 2016 11: 58
      I hate Stolypin. Installation of a monument to him from the same series as the plaque to Mannerheim, Kolchak, Wrangel. His "deeds" are a great evil for the people of Russia. The destruction of the community that existed for thousands of years in Russia, an attempt that ended in complete failure, the settling of Siberia and the Far East by settlers, Stolypin "ties", extrajudicial "troikas". ! Gaidar of the Nikolaev time! Scum!
      1. +3
        22 November 2016 12: 49
        since a community has existed for a thousand years, so maybe it’s outdated already? there are new, more profitable forms of management? and so that the revolutionaries hung-well, maybe that was how it should have been?
      2. +1
        22 November 2016 13: 00
        Quote: user3970
        resettlement of Siberia and the Far East by immigrants

        This is just not bad, but on the contrary "gut". "Forever Alive" in one of his works wrote that only 40% of the settlers were entrenched. Now there is not a very large flow of people who want to take over the "Far Eastern hectares".
      3. +2
        22 November 2016 21: 35
        User3970, Apparently, according to the story, you did not have more than 3.?
        According to the law on state of emergency, terrorists were tried by a military tribunal and the accused had lawyers, they could count on calling witnesses, and the "troikas" appeared in 1935! The verdict is passed in absentia! And after that, will you still argue?
        Regarding the collective farm about: You judge them by books, and I was born in a collective farmer's family and talked with old people who remembered collectivizations and I will say: Peasants HATE Stalin for collective farms.
        I advise you to read the correspondence between Sholokhov and Stalin, and if you wish: look for the old collective farmers in the Kuban.
        Also, where have you seen the "live" collective farm now? Something like a fairy tale. Even in Belarus, they are not officially called collective farms and ate shkandybayut (friends were there in the summer and say: in today's state farms people live there, and collective farms only remember the past)
        1. +4
          22 November 2016 23: 33
          The kulaks are cursing the collective farms, and the poor were united into collective farms, because it was a real way to improve their hopeless lives. With collective farms, civilization came to the village.
        2. +1
          23 November 2016 10: 35
          Monarchist. The former collective farms survived, although, of course, not all of them survived. Many have managed to adapt to market conditions. Among them are the Frunze collective farm in the Belgorod region, the Krasnoarmeisky state breeding plant in the Krasnodar Territory, the Kazminsky collective farm in the Stavropol Territory, the Lenin's Way in the Kirov region ... The latter, for example, already in Soviet times was a strong farm with a properly organized economy
    2. +3
      22 November 2016 12: 10
      Quote: voyaka uh
      . Nothing prevented us from doing the same in Russia.

      Without a revolution? Oh well.
      1. +3
        22 November 2016 12: 50
        and the warrior wrote like that after the revolution: who would just give up his hard-earned money for nothing?
        1. +2
          22 November 2016 12: 57
          The warrior wrote how it was in Europe.
          Quote: voyaka uh
          His reforms were right

          Stolypin really didn’t want a revolution.
        2. +1
          22 November 2016 13: 08
          Actually, they gave ...
    3. 0
      22 November 2016 14: 07
      And many peasants would have bought it?
      1. +1
        22 November 2016 14: 46
        Roman 66 ... The community is the forerunner of the collective farms revived by Stalin. In a past life he lived in Leningrad. He dreamed of getting a job in one of the Leningrad fishing or Baltic collective farms. (I think "Baltika" is in the Nevsky district). So the salary there was 4 times higher than the average in the city + comfortable housing and luxurious social services. everyday life. Got a bummer, in spite of 4 higher working categories and higher tech. education. And even now, in the surviving collective farms, people live like Christ's in the bosom. And more ... The community - collective farm - kibbutz - (Jewish) - feeds all of Russia with vegetables from the Sinai desert.
        1. +3
          22 November 2016 14: 59
          Vic Regarding the Far Eastern hectare ... 100% convinced - this is another ... skill of the state. When in Russia there are about 30 million hectares of agricultural land in mortgages with banks (in other words, moneylenders) and are not cultivated, overgrown with weedy forest ... At the very site, on a river bank of 35 acres, only under a garden and berry bushes + house 200 m 2 per building (building) for the soul, and I don’t think it is excessive ... In order to live and develop at least to the East beyond the Urals, it is necessary to allocate 200 hectares of territory by the state and exemption from all taxes for 10 years. Then it will be good.
          1. +1
            22 November 2016 16: 17
            if we talk about the times of Stolypin, then still select tools and livestock.
        2. 0
          22 November 2016 22: 41
          Quote: user3970
          kibbutz - (Jewish) - feeds the whole of Russia with vegetables
          nifigase belay
          1. +1
            28 November 2016 20: 28
            Quote: Stanislav
            Quote: user3970
            kibbutz - (Jewish) - feeds the whole of Russia with vegetables
            nifigase belay

            More likely poison ...
            Probably nitrogen per square meter of soil shove a few kg. So much for nitrites with nitrates in fruits and vegetables, with MPC exceeded hundreds or even thousands of times ...
            Can you trust them?
  13. 0
    22 November 2016 19: 22
    All of them were aimed at protecting the personal rights of citizens, their property. Citizens of the Russian Empire received the right to defend their opinion, their rights, property. These reforms included laws on religious freedom and the inviolability of the person, on the abolition of restrictions on rights for certain categories of citizens. In fact, freedom of belief was proclaimed, which was of great importance for Russia, where the Old Believers were oppressed and Jews were restricted.
    did not have time
    F. Engels noted (for a long time) "the revolution in Russia is inevitable"
  14. +2
    22 November 2016 20: 28
    Author! You are absolutely right that Peter Arkadyevich Stolypin could at least delay the death of the empire.
    Fate twice sent Nikolay 2 SMART X assistants: 1) S.Yu. Witte (his resignation was sought by the "German" party) and 2STOLYPIN.
    By the way, about 8-10 years ago, the Central Committee held a vote: the great figure, or somehow and most, preferred Stolypin. Maybe you remember how many people voted for Lenin and Stolypin?
    1. 0
      23 November 2016 16: 08
      Quote: Monarchist
      S.Yu. Witte

      About Witte question.
  15. +1
    22 November 2016 20: 53
    To the author - "+". The topic is controversial from the point of view of worldview. And Mr. Samsonov identified the alignment of forces and enemies correctly. ... It is an exaggeration to look for the advance of Russian Protestant ethics among the dynasties of the Old Believers.

    And about the "inevitability" of history ... - Comrade Cartalon 07:09 very elegantly put it. Let the fans of determinism prophesy something inevitable to Russia for the next 20 years ... And heaven will have a reason to laugh ...
  16. +1
    23 November 2016 15: 53
    Without the reform of the autocracy into a constitutional monarchy, all these mriyas would have ended with what they ended up with. In principle, we still have a tradition of autocracy, where the government of the country is delegated to one person, who himself puts his people in power. Even at the elections to the Duma, our "monarch" saved the falling rating of the party of the constitutional majority with his appeal and was the first to come running to congratulate her an hour after the end of voting in the European part of the country.
  17. Ham
    0
    11 January 2017 13: 14
    Stolypin was 20 years late ... and at the same time, the ruling elite, who traditionally took care of Western interests, showed very strong resistance to his reforms ...
  18. 0
    2 November 2017 21: 25
    On June 17, 1910, Tsar Nicholas II approved the law “On the Procedure for Publishing Laws and Decisions of National Importance Regarding Finland” developed by the Stolypin government, which significantly curtailed Finnish autonomy and strengthened the role of central authority in Finland.
    THIS CONSIDERATIONS REMAINED THE USSR "UNCONDITIBLE WAR" 39-40GG