"Kalashnikov" proposed a project of a robotic vessel with drones on board

39
The Kalashnikov Concern presented to the Russian military a draft of an unmanned catamaran capable of carrying several tactical UAVs on board, according to News.

"Kalashnikov" proposed a project of a robotic vessel with drones on board




A new vessel is supposed to be developed within the framework of the target program “Creating advanced military robotics up to 2025 of the year” approved by the RF Ministry of Defense.

“The fully autonomous Triton system, the concept of which was proposed by the ZALA AeroGroup enterprise (part of the Kalashnikov concern), will be capable of conducting air, surface and underwater reconnaissance, as well as destroying targets using a remotely controlled weapon station equipped with a PKT caliber 7,62 machine gun, 750 mm. The ship will receive two XNUMX horsepower marine diesel engines and will have a range of XNUMX nautical miles. UAVs add another thirty kilometers to this radius, ”the newspaper writes, citing the developers.

“We are actively developing competencies in the field of creating unmanned vehicles. Our goal is to integrate them into systems, parts of which can interact with each other. In particular, the idea of ​​an unmanned boat system based on which an unmanned aviation, lies in the fact that this system will be able to patrol the coastline and participate in search and rescue operations in a fully autonomous mode, " - said the general director of the concern Alexey Krivoruchko.

Judging by the engine power, the catamaran will be small - a few tens of meters. On board "will be placed an impressive arsenal of television, radio and sonar detection equipment of the enemy, which will not only monitor the surface, air and underwater situation in the patrol area, but also independently direct the enemy combat swimmers, helicopters and coast guard boats of the water area ", Noted in the article.

As for the UAVs (such as the quadrocopters of the ZALA 421-21 UAV), they belong to the class of tactical reconnaissance aircraft. Because of their small size, BLAH remain practically indistinguishable to the enemy and can carry out hidden radar or video surveillance.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    17 November 2016 09: 59
    "... On board" will be placed an impressive arsenal of television, radio and sonar detection of the enemy ... "
    The enemy, poachers, isn’t quite clear, or what?
    1. +1
      17 November 2016 10: 34
      From the proposal to the implementation of the project in metal, there is a lot of time, and even state tests must be well passed, so before the drones come into service, a lot of water will leak. And the Defense Ministry still has to say whether they need such an apparatus or not, but for now the military’s opinion has not yet been voiced.
    2. +1
      17 November 2016 10: 35
      Something annoying news from the concern, just like a cornucopia. It is necessary to send the Accounting Chamber there for revision.
    3. +3
      17 November 2016 10: 45
      "Kalashnikov" proposed a project of a robotic vessel with drones on board

      Damn, if it goes on like this, then soon our pilots will fly on Kalash laughing
      Where did the "Kalashnikov" take it ??? fool The machine is normal, modern can’t make, but they climbed into the fleet and aviation! Where is the new military machine? AEK is still leading. Or until all Soviet reserves are erased, will we sit on * opera exactly?
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 11: 30
        So Kalashnikov who you know - and is engaged in shooting.

        It’s like the work of AK Bars - to equalize the profile work of Zelenodolsk Shipyard.

        After Kalashnikov became a Concern, he bought up a bunch of assets, including:
        Rybinsky Zavod - which rivets cutters for customs, fish storage, craft and now the localized Raptor (on Italian energy and German seats), clones of American semi-rigid boats BK-8-9-10-12.

        UAV is engaged in HALL - which is also included in Kalashnikov.

        They had worked with all this before, but they wrote their name in the news, but now Kalashnikov wink . But on earth, nothing much has changed.
      2. +3
        17 November 2016 11: 35
        Quote: GSH-18
        Damn, if it goes on like this, then soon our pilots will fly on Kalash
        Where did the "Kalashnikov" take it ???

        So "Kalashnikov" is not only the Arms Factory, but several other enterprises of which machines are made only at one. Earlier, even cars with motorcycles were produced at Izhmash.
    4. 0
      17 November 2016 12: 44
      Quote: Jovanni
      The enemy, poachers, isn’t quite clear, or what?

      Watching what drones. Although they wrote that tactical (and what, RCC under the belly, and destroyers winked ), but if you imagine that reconnaissance, with an exhaust HAK, then a very convenient thing will turn out to track enemy submarines.
  2. +3
    17 November 2016 09: 59
    Still, the Kalashnikov concern was not badly modernized .. Constantly presents some new developments, etc. And three years ago, I remember here they were sneering and indignant (including myself) that the reorganization of the Kalashnikov enterprise had begun! I wonder how they got the Kalash patent, even though they pressed someone, especially Poland (they were stamped serially there)?
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 10: 54
      Quote: STARPER
      I wonder how they got the Kalash patent, even though they pressed someone, especially Poland (they were stamped serially there)?

      How fast? Are they pinned down? What are you talking about? There, the Americans have recently begun to stamp our AK-47s without any licenses, in a brazen one with the inscription "made in usa", you see there is a great civil demand for Kalash, but because of the sanctions from the Russian Federation, Kalash is not supplied! The same thing happened in America with our RPG-7, but for the American army. Such things, STARPER.
      1. 0
        17 November 2016 11: 11
        Quote: GSH-18
        Quote: STARPER
        I wonder how they got the Kalash patent, even though they pressed someone, especially Poland (they were stamped serially there)?

        How fast? Are they pinned down? What are you talking about? There, the Americans have recently begun to stamp our AK-47s without any licenses, in a brazen one with the inscription "made in usa", you see there is a great civil demand for Kalash, but because of the sanctions from the Russian Federation, Kalash is not supplied! The same thing happened in America with our RPG-7, but for the American army. Such things, STARPER.

        Well, I'm talking about that, they value Russian weapons and arm themselves, even unlicensed! But no one can make a real Russian Kalash ... Our souls are being put into it! Outwardly, not handsome, but in his hands lies like a glove .. Especially if a wooden forend and butt!
        These are the things the GSh-18, in the landing troops ...
        1. 0
          17 November 2016 11: 28
          Quote: STARPER
          Quote: GSH-18
          Quote: STARPER
          I wonder how they got the Kalash patent, even though they pressed someone, especially Poland (they were stamped serially there)?

          How fast? Are they pinned down? What are you talking about? There, the Americans have recently begun to stamp our AK-47s without any licenses, in a brazen one with the inscription "made in usa", you see there is a great civil demand for Kalash, but because of the sanctions from the Russian Federation, Kalash is not supplied! The same thing happened in America with our RPG-7, but for the American army. Such things, STARPER.

          Well, I'm talking about that, they value Russian weapons and arm themselves, even unlicensed! But no one can make a real Russian Kalash ... Our souls are being put into it! Outwardly, not handsome, but in his hands lies like a glove .. Especially if a wooden forend and butt!
          These are the things the GSh-18, in the landing troops ...

          You are probably a poet or artist, all your comments are very emotional - either some slogans, bragging, or patriotism rolls over - I still do not understand.
          Usually they do ours, you don’t have to attribute soul / love everywhere, just qualitatively on equipment according to the classical scheme, with sufficient automation of production, which is possible and significant because managers with optimizations and replacing with Chinese ones can kill quality.
          1. 0
            17 November 2016 11: 57
            Quote: Corsair
            You are probably a poet or artist, all your comments are very emotional - either some slogans, bragging, or patriotism rolls over - I still do not understand.

            But you still will never understand ... I love Russia, I just love everything, although it doesn’t stroke us on the head, but this is not the main thing ... It’s all hidden deep in your soul! And you’re not picking a dirty finger there ...

            I’m so ... And then I won’t let you go at once! soldier
    2. +2
      17 November 2016 11: 32
      HALES entered Kalashnikov - which before that sawed its concept of unmanned combined systems (that is, an uninhabited boat + an air UAV - a large air UAV + a small air UAV, etc.)

      In fact, nothing has changed. Previously, this news was written by HALL presented .... Now Kalashnikov introduced.
  3. +1
    17 November 2016 10: 16
    My dream is an unmanned catamaran for fishing. I went out to sea to catch fish places with information on SMS and only then you are going to fish. And then you go to the training camp for half a day and hang out in the sea and then suck your paw. Think Kalashnikov.
    1. +1
      17 November 2016 11: 59
      I have come up with such a catamaran for a long time - only sailing, so that fuel is not wasted, it was safe and with high autonomy. Three years ago he sent his description to Kalashnikov - so they were born this monster with two ICEs and turrets! No Maritime Register will let him in the sea!
      Pure water - drank the budget.
      And I have RPBC and thought about a massive series of hundreds of thousands of copies for hundreds of different use cases, including and fishing for small industrial fishing for the peoples of the North and the Far East: went to sea, echo sounder found a school of fish - dropped the net, circled - and to the shore, where it and the net are pulled out and empty. Then again - at sea, and so - around the clock hundreds of catamarans. Yes, the catch from one is small, but no one needs to freeze in water - safety! And for the small villages 10-20 my catamarans will be given food, or the military in the Kuril Islands.
      This is not counting anti-submarine defense, cargo transportation (to the Kuril Islands - now they carry a bag of potatoes by helicopter, it turns out 1kg - 10tys rub), a meteorological emergency rescue raft on sea routes and much more ...
    2. 0
      17 November 2016 12: 46
      It is necessary that he himself tossed the gear, he pulled out.
      And you watched all this in a fast-forward recording. Why waste time ...
      1. 0
        17 November 2016 13: 21
        He throws the gear himself, but to pull out - where? So he drags her to a place of basing, where people empty her. Or do you dumplings - in sour cream, and then - in your mouth ?! wassat
  4. +1
    17 November 2016 10: 20
    Over the past few years, all their statements have been zilch! Ah, 12 Kalash, - by the box, called a scam!
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 12: 41
      Quote: satelit24
      Ah, 12 Kalash, - by the box, called a scam!

      The box is a modern version of the fence. Do you believe everything written there?
      How do you live, because everything is so bad ...
  5. +2
    17 November 2016 10: 21
    That would not do if only not machines ...
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 12: 43
      Good for you, without cons?
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 13: 19
        Quote: Genry
        Good for you, without cons?

        I don’t care, but it’s bad for you. I don’t have anything against kalash for my time, a killer little thing, and now it can do a lot, but time dictates new requirements for small arms and Kalashnikov should do this instead of resting on his laurels. even refuses Kalash in favor of the Israeli rifleman you can put them cons.
        1. 0
          17 November 2016 16: 09
          Quote: activator
          I don’t care, but you feel bad.

          But I’m an optimist, it’s not bad for me.

          Quote: activator
          Vietnam even refuses Kalash in favor of the Israeli rifleman

          Well, TAR and its modern modification and I like it more than the angular and prickly-looking AK-12. And how he understands ... only in two parts.
          But the problem of modern infantry weapons is the loss of its effectiveness. If you look at statistics on combat losses, you will see that the role of personal weapons is so small that you will never notice the difference between the old AKM and modern models.
          Modern small arms have lost their effectiveness due to improved protection for fighters.
          Bullets with a caliber of up to 7,62 are unable to penetrate body armor of the 5th class. There is not enough energy.
          Need a cartridge with a bullet up to 4mm (thin but heavy, about 10g). The barrel should be smooth, 9mm caliber or more, for greater speed and energy of more than 5000 J .. This cartridge can even hurt. Yes, there will be a return, if they are afraid of it, then it is better not to fight at all. And it’s already ridiculous to see how, even on armored vehicles, they put PKT-7,62.
          The 12,7 gauge is too heavy for the infantry to move.
          And grenades! Grenades for all occasions!
          And a personal dog-like drone, so that all the "good" was dragged in battle and pulled out when injured.
  6. +3
    17 November 2016 10: 35
    And again this nonsense .... Uncles come up with a new useless toy with huge zeros in price. To create military robots you need an information environment. It must be created, otherwise all these robots turn into toys .... Watch our UAVs stupidly fly in Syria, neither profit nor harm. They make a movie, and only .... Well, then, then, the coordinates of fixed targets can be determined, but mobile groups can’t do it .... The principle was discovered, it was fantastic for our VSs. Between it, I discovered and destroyed the analysis in manual mode, being late for a few hours, and the bearded left. So the spotters of fire jump with the radio stations and die, and the toys just fly in the sky .... Why? To show you the movie in the news and admire the successes that are not there? ....
    1. +1
      17 November 2016 11: 01
      Quote: okko077
      For what? To show you the movie in the news and admire the successes that are not? ..

      Not true. There are still successes, dear.
      Yes, while with the electronic and software part we are not so hot. But even without super-advanced new products, our army in Syria works, be healthy Yes
      1. 0
        17 November 2016 12: 03
        Quote: GSH-18
        our army in Syria is working - be healthy

        We compared: a first grader and Karelin - and this has been going on for more than a year! So something is wrong with the "Karelin", isn't it clear ?!
        We need UAVs - drums, I developed them 20 years ago, but we all chased quadrocopters - and here is the result: no UAVs, no army, no economy ...
        Now with the gliders is the same tramp ..
    2. +1
      17 November 2016 12: 34
      Quote: okko077
      To create military robots you need an information environment.

      Thursday Friday.... ???
      Everything is created, for this only sensible brains are needed, but not yours!

      Quote: okko077
      Watch our UAVs stupidly fly in Syria

      Show! Where are the links to the videos.
      Fantasy in your head is inaccessible to us!

      Quote: okko077
      Well, then, maybe, the coordinates of the stationary targets are determined, but the mobile groups can not ....

      What does "then" mean?
      Even your smartphone knocks its owners about your coordinates in order to shove you up-to-date advertising or the location of the types of points that interest you.
      Intelligence is not your specialty; who goes where is not so important compared to the statistics of such trips, which allows you to identify important objects.

      Quote: okko077
      The principle discovered, destroyed it is fantastic for our sun.

      Most of the time a drone is searching. To hit targets, there are strike weapons: artillery, aviation (from jump airfields or on duty flights), missile weapons.
      The drone only needs to lead the target and, if possible or necessary, highlight it.

      Quote: okko077
      So the spotters of fire jump with the radio stations and die, and the toys just fly in the sky .... Why? To show you the movie in the news and admire the successes that are not?

      Well, scold everyone in a row ... But that's what they themselves contributed to? Although this is visible in your comment.
  7. IVP
    +1
    17 November 2016 10: 42
    Quote: Jovanni
    The enemy is not quite clear

    An adversary is one who opposes someone-smth., Is hostile to someone-smth.
    This is how the explanatory dictionary interprets.
  8. +1
    17 November 2016 10: 48
    Are combat swimmers also robots? belay laughing
    Something often concern with robots, but where is the output?
  9. nnm
    0
    17 November 2016 10: 55
    As in that joke: everything that they try to collect, after processing with a file, will resemble AK-47
  10. +1
    17 November 2016 11: 04
    Many reproach me for exaggerating the colors and dramatizing the situation too much ... But we have an information catastrophe in the army, yes ... a catastrophe ... We do not know how to fight in a modern way. Our leadership shies away from the term "network-centric wars" like a black cat. The generals live in the past and are ready to lay down the entire army, only to obtain information about the enemy .. They do not understand that a paratrooper breaking a brick with his head and a tank going nowhere are not symbols of modern war. The symbol of modern war is the operator of the combat information system in the control center wearing glasses and in front of the monitor! Whether someone likes it or not, this is true, and we do not have such a system. Instead, they are disparate, lonely devices, incompatible and useless for modern technology. Moreover, this approach turns the most modern military equipment, and we have it, into useless toys, or rather, a target for the American army ... Generals plan to receive information about the enemy in the old way - sacrificing thousands of soldiers and hundreds of pieces of equipment in direct contact with the enemy. They do not introduce information technologies in the army, do not create information systems that allow finding and destroying the enemy at a great distance and without loss. Syria, like Finland at one time, has exposed deep flaws and lag in the army. And the consequences will be the same ...
    1. nnm
      +1
      17 November 2016 11: 23
      a comparison of the actions of the armed forces in Georgia in 2008. and MTR operations in Crimea, as it were, refute your assertion .... Yes, it’s impossible to make a half-starved army and navy, which has been deprived of financing for decades, with closed military schools in a couple of years more timely and change the world outlook of a higher com, but my comparison clearly indicates the reverse of your statement. It seems to me.
    2. 0
      17 November 2016 11: 30
      So in the Russian army, the most important thing is the great and mighty electronic warfare. According to the army religion, he puts an end to the term "network-centric wars". Amen.
    3. 0
      17 November 2016 13: 07
      Quote: okko077
      we have an information disaster in the army, yes ... a disaster ...

      "Sheff, the FSE is gone, everything is gone! ..."
      One could speak of a catastrophe when the army and navy collapsed. Now everything is being restored.
      Shoigu, he is so calm - a real fighter. And you are so ....
  11. 0
    17 November 2016 11: 28
    So here he is, the new Russian aircraft carrier! A worthy replacement for the decrepit Kuse.
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 12: 57
      Have you confused the sweet with the salty ... Or are you really doing this at the table?
  12. +2
    17 November 2016 11: 36
    I read this "article". Double opinion about the author. Either the idea of ​​this wunderwafe was taken from the technical circle of elementary school students, or the author, before writing this opus, swallowed "amusing" pills.
    I'll start in order.
    1. Who and from where will manage this wunderwolf with all this arsenal of hydroacoustics, ZALA drones and other technical means, as well as the navigation of this "ship"?
    2. Where will the UAVs be located? If on deck, is the author aware that the very first breeze of 10-12 m / s will carry all this "aviation" into the open sea?
    3. Have we already completed the autonomous landing of the ZALA UAV on a moving deck? (I have never heard of such achievements).
    4. Let's say the drone miraculously sat on the deck. Who and how will prepare it for the next flight (well, there to refuel it or change the battery for an electric motor) ???
    5. But the screw of the engine of this catamaran wraps some bit of a fishing net, then what to do?!? People on board are not net ...
    And I can dig up a dozen more such questions. But all of them will unequivocally lead to the conclusion that this wunderwaffe should be accompanied by a tugboat with a team of operators-managers of this entire technical arsenal located on the Kalashnikovskaya wunderwaffe. And here the most important question of this topic arises. Is it worth the dressing up in the way that is given in the article ??? [b] [/ b] After all, if you move the UAV to the same tug (subject to working out their landing on the deck), yes, install a remotely controlled turret on the roof of the bridge with a machine gun, and in addition to take with you a towed GAK or "Harpsichord", then such a tug will completely replace all these mrii Kalashnikovs.
    Well (alaverds) on horseradish goat button accordion (in the form in which we were painted in the article?!?
  13. 0
    17 November 2016 12: 05
    The appointment is not formulated. The concept of threats is not formulated. Detection and destruction tools are not linked.
  14. 0
    17 November 2016 22: 23
    Quote: Aviagr
    He throws the gear himself, but to pull out - where? So he drags her to a place of basing, where people empty her. Or do you dumplings - in sour cream, and then - in your mouth ?! wassat

    That is, for each catamaran, is it necessary to deepen the bottom for every village there, with a coastal battery or some other economic object, so that he can drag the net without clinging, and regularly light-climbers clean all approaches from fuel and other garbage?
    Or will he unhook the stuck and snagged network with manipulators?
    Or emergency reset? So then you will not stockpile networks.
    I'm not kidding, I'm just wondering ...
    Although ... Who am I kidding ... I'm kidding of course ...
    Are the sails big?
    Well, the sailing net with the fish, it’s such, not small ... But what if there is a headwind?
    The ebb there, a draft, or another event?
    Maybe all the same ICE is in place?
    And such a self-propelled fishing thing, it’s just not a sin to board, local fishermen, brakanery and other dashing people will be delighted. Especially if there are dozens and hundreds of them there ... If you don’t hack and reflash, then just sell it for spare parts. There is also an echo sounder and a computer, and cameras, and batteries, and a rag on a sail ... And all sorts of tricky motors that control the sail ... But the hull is generally a universal thing ... The structure of the internal combustion engine against the background of all this is already a penny in fact .
    I don’t know anything, citizen boss, after a storm on the shore I found ... Lying so sickly ... Nothing ...
    Maybe the machine gun is not in vain?
    In general, the idea in my opinion needs some refinement.