ISIS fighters have been told not to shoot down American aircraft

68
Information agency journalists available Sputnik Arabic turned out to be a remarkable document. Its remarkable fact is related to the fact that it was mined in the region stormed by the American coalition and the Iraqi army of Mosul, and that it contains directives for militants of the Islamic State terrorist organization (prohibited in the Russian Federation).

The paper was signed by one of the leaders of ISIS named Abu Mu'awiya. It contains the text in the form of an appeal to representatives of a terrorist group, which explicitly states that the militants should not shoot down American aircraft, even if they have such an opportunity.






Paper with directives was found approximately 30 km from Mosul - in the city of Bahdida that was liberated from ISIS.

In fact, this is yet another proof that the operation in Mosul, with all its bloodshed, is like a terrible theatrical production, the main victims of which are peaceful Iraqis. The leaders of the IS long ago left Mosul and its environs just before the start of the operation, leaving “cannon fodder” in the city — ordinary militants. The United States, obviously having influence on the leaders of the terrorist structures, and sent out a directive that they support this bloody "theater", while not particularly zealous in the fighting against the American aviation.

A separate question is whether the militants of the IG have the necessary means of destruction for attacking American aircraft. After all, as is known, in Syria, terrorists against airplanes of the Russian Aerospace Forces from “Air Defense” funds tried to use inflated means of contraception with improvised self-made explosive devices attached to them ...
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    17 November 2016 06: 14
    Arabists ... please translate what is written on the papers in the photo.
    1. +13
      17 November 2016 06: 17
      I don’t particularly trust journalists, but I won’t be surprised at this fact!
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 09: 57
        In pursuit of sensations, journalists can concoct anything they want, including a piece of paper with the signature from the leader to his own - "Do not shoot down planes."
      2. +1
        17 November 2016 10: 24
        Quote: Finches
        I don’t particularly trust journalists

        Especially when they write like this ....

        A separate question is whether the IS fighters have the necessary means of destruction to strike at American aircraft. After all, as you know, in Syria, terrorists against the aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces tried to use inflated contraceptives with improvised explosive devices attached to them from air defense systems ...

        I understand that for the author, the helicopters are from the armored "Kantemirovskaya" ... although the forum users have already noticed.

        Quote: Temples
        My partner at the desk would remind him that the terrorists destroyed our helicopters. Does the writer think that they shot down helicopters with condoms?
    2. +10
      17 November 2016 06: 20
      The paper was signed by one of the leaders of ISIS named Abu Muawiyah. It contains a text in the form of an appeal to representatives of a terrorist group, which explicitly states that militants should not shoot down American planes, even if they have such an opportunity

      Yes, it is such a paper, it will tolerate everything, but if this is true, then there simply are no boundaries for the vileness and baseness of mattress covers: but here I join
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Arabists ... please translate what is written on the papers in the photo.
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 07: 46
        in Syria, terrorists against aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces tried to use inflated contraceptives using air defense equipment

        Some scribblers would be good to wake up or get off the glass. What are they sending themselves to the parallel world there?
        My partner at the desk would remind him that the terrorists destroyed our helicopters. Does the writer think that they shot down helicopters with condoms? Or does he have it on his head?
        Why are you happy scribbler? Already defeated everyone?
      2. +3
        17 November 2016 09: 07
        Set off ISIS survivors to shoot down? And the ovs have an order not to touch the little men in black, not to shoot at the brothers in pickup trucks, to feed and drink at a meeting)
        1. +4
          17 November 2016 09: 19
          The circus, arranged by mattresses in the form of an assault on Mosul, is impressive, their cynicism and double-dealing position are also impressive.
    3. +7
      17 November 2016 06: 26
      If this is true, this piece of paper can be sent (ridiculously of course) to the UN and its most .. The Hague. It is clear that they will wipe off, but still, poke ..
      Quote: The same Lech
      Arabists ... please translate what is written on the papers in the photo.
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 07: 44
        Quote: 210ox
        If this is true, this piece of paper can be sent (ridiculously of course) to the UN and its most .. The Hague. It is clear that they will wipe off, but still, poke ..

        Hmm and acc a terrorist on earth determines which country a plane flying in the sky belongs to? by transponder, flag?
        the document looks like a fake
        1. +4
          17 November 2016 07: 59
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          by transponder, flag?

          For example, in terms of silhouette, a thunderbolt is never similar to a rook., Or on TV, where they say that only a coalition led by the United States works on Mosul.
          1. +1
            17 November 2016 08: 02
            Quote: colonel
            For example, in silhouette

            Probably joked?
            1. +2
              17 November 2016 10: 37
              Quote: atalef
              Quote: colonel
              For example, in silhouette

              Probably joked?

              Ahem .. and what's wrong? those planes that we fly are quietly determined by eye, especially if they are at altitudes on which attack aircraft operate.
            2. +2
              17 November 2016 12: 29
              Quote: atalef
              Probably joked?

              How did you guess?
              1. 0
                17 November 2016 15: 14
                Quote: colonel
                How did you guess?


                That is, the Arabs will soar near the planes and stare at them intently. understandably...
          2. 0
            17 November 2016 10: 01
            Quote: colonel
            For example, in terms of silhouette, a thunderbolt is never similar to a rook., Or on TV, where they say that only a coalition led by the United States works on Mosul.


            according to the silhouette, the ships in the sea determine ...
        2. +3
          17 November 2016 08: 16
          Are there Russian planes near Mosul? What is there to define? After the "victorious march" of American troops in France in 1945, for some reason the theater near Mosul is not perceived as a fake.
          1. +2
            17 November 2016 09: 39
            Quote: Vlad.by
            Are there Russian planes near Mosul? What is there to define? After the "victorious march" of American troops in France in 1945, for some reason the theater near Mosul is not perceived as a fake.

            Well, Iraqi fly too, and also French and Australian - and not just shoot down American laughing just enchanting nonsense, the Americans probably hang over ISIS positions so that the stars can see or there they wave their wings - 3 times quickly and 3 times slowly fellow
        3. +1
          17 November 2016 09: 37
          Above Mosul, only coalition aviation flies.
        4. +2
          17 November 2016 10: 30
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          Hmm and acc a terrorist on earth determines which country a plane flying in the sky belongs to?

          Really how? )))
          Well, at least not helicopters))
        5. 0
          17 November 2016 10: 50
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          Hmm and acc a terrorist on earth determines which country a plane flying in the sky belongs to? by transponder, flag?

          Why mattresses painted their planes in the color of Russian? Now probably repaint)))
        6. +1
          17 November 2016 14: 04
          As I understand it, the MANPADS have a scope, and for sure you can see the plane into it considering that the height of the defeat from it is not higher than 3.5 km
    4. 0
      17 November 2016 07: 52
      And if they bring down, then what will happen? And who said that there were IS fighters in Bahdid?
    5. +1
      17 November 2016 08: 38
      And where is this black ... monkey from the international criminal court?
      With which banana is she not interested in THIS?
      It was not in vain that during the times of the USSR they taught to hate racism and blacks, oh no wonder ...
  2. +1
    17 November 2016 06: 15
    What an abomination .....
    1. +5
      17 November 2016 06: 17
      The same LESHA Today, 06:14 New
      Arabists ... please translate what is written on the papers in the photo.
      Same lech
      0 Aleksander Today, 06:15 New
      What an abomination ...
      is not an exact translation ... fellow
    2. +3
      17 November 2016 06: 28
      This is not an abomination, a pattern ...
  3. +7
    17 November 2016 06: 17
    Kirby as usual will say that they have nothing to do with it, and it’s just that the Barmalei are aware of the democratic values ​​of the exceptional, and therefore they don’t bring down the coalition that carries humanism and peace laughing
    who will shoot down carrier pigeons? and the parcels can not wait))))
  4. +1
    17 November 2016 06: 18
    And the Americans will start making "mistakes" when hitting over and over again ... am
  5. +6
    17 November 2016 06: 21
    So they have mutual love ... Some do not shoot down, others bomb anything, just not the IG ...
  6. +1
    17 November 2016 06: 22
    The invention of the United States atomic weapons is no less evil than if they had come up with one in Nazi Germany. Germany would use it for its intended purpose, and the United States allows it to pursue a policy of any meanness under the cover of it, the consequences are the same.
  7. KOH
    +2
    17 November 2016 06: 22
    I wonder how the bearded will recognize whose plane it is?)))
    1. +6
      17 November 2016 06: 32
      how will the bearded recognize whose plane it is?

      Yes, very simple. Before striking, they will be informed that they are bombing you today in such and such an area. And the wolves are full and the sheep are whole. And American cynicism really knows no boundaries.
      1. +2
        17 November 2016 07: 48
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Yes, very simple. Before striking, they will be informed that they are bombing you today in such and such an area. And the wolves are full and the sheep are whole. And American cynicism really knows no boundaries.


        how do you imagine that? The Americans planned a secret muck, and then these plans are brought to the terra with leaflets. contingent?

        strange however the way to hide such not good things
        1. +2
          17 November 2016 07: 53
          And how do you imagine the coalition struggle in two years? Destroyed tractors, weddings, funeral processions, hospitals, schools. And at the same time, the fighters have mountains of weapons (including new anti-tank weapons and MANPADS), a sea of ​​ammunition. Americans are not shy, and why shy to those whom they support.
      2. +1
        17 November 2016 07: 54
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Yes, very simple. Before striking, they will be informed that they are bombing you today in such and such an area.

        those. Americans will notify. Turks. Belgians. Jordanians and Iraqis - all of them individually notify -or all through amers?
        Quote: rotmistr60
        today we are bombing you in such and such an area. And the wolves are fed and the whole sheep.

        Goals? yesterday destroyed the head of ISIS in Raqqa.
        Well, this nonsense does not fit. request
        1. +5
          17 November 2016 07: 56
          That's who often raves especially about the events in Syria, so this is your citizen. You’d better not defend the bandits, but stop attacking the Syrian troops.
          1. 0
            17 November 2016 07: 57
            Quote: rotmistr60
            That's who often raves especially about the events in Syria, so this is your citizen.

            details, please wink
        2. 0
          17 November 2016 09: 46
          Why nonsense? This is the dialectic of the foreign policy of the world hegemon. A certain Osama has long been a great friend of the big white people from DC.
  8. +1
    17 November 2016 06: 30
    They are doing something with people there, in their secret prisons, that they come out completely reforged, as they changed - rabid dogs.
  9. +4
    17 November 2016 06: 33
    The Anglo-Saxons know how to "fight"! Remember the second front in the Second World War. Some kind of treaty war.
  10. +1
    17 November 2016 06: 56
    So for a downed plane coalition barmalei will be deprived?
  11. +2
    17 November 2016 07: 13
    The representative of the State Department lost his temper over the question of Russia's actions in Syria
    Kirby surprised journalists with his briefing behavior Kirby surprised journalists with his briefing behavior

    John Kirby could not name the organizations that reported Washington about the air strikes of the air forces of hospitals [video]
    The journalist’s request to clarify which organizations reported to the United States that the Russian Aerospace Forces allegedly attacked five hospitals in Syrian Aleppo, unbalanced the representative of the US State Department John Kirby.

    During the press conference, the diplomat said that Washington had read "information from trustworthy humanitarian organizations." Then the correspondent of the RT TV channel asked to name these sources.
  12. 0
    17 November 2016 07: 16
    It turns out the leaders of ISIS bought. I did not know that they were selling their religious ideas and holy jihads so easily. It turns out that whatever the terrorists do, it is a soap bubble inflated to enrich their leaders. Well then, it should not be so difficult to destroy them.
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 07: 36
      Leonid Khar ...... It turns out that the leaders of ISIS were bought.

      That is why Obama, pathetically, openly through the media, gave the command to eliminate the leadership of ISIS. Elementary sweep of witnesses.
      1. +1
        17 November 2016 07: 55
        Quote: askort154
        That is why Obama, pathetically, openly through the media, gave the command to eliminate the leadership of ISIS. Elementary sweep of witnesses.

        that is, we will bomb you, but do not shoot us down? So understand this?
        1. 0
          17 November 2016 09: 46
          Quote: atalef
          that is, we will bomb you, but do not shoot us down? So understand this?

          which at the same time does not stop them from shooting down the drones of the same Americans
      2. 0
        17 November 2016 10: 02
        In this case, these leaders would be sung by nightingales - in front of the cameras - about who finances them and gives instructions along with all the proofs - they have nothing to lose.
    2. 0
      17 November 2016 08: 04
      Quote: Leonid Khar
      Well then, it should not be so difficult to destroy them.

      Or maybe try to outbid? wink
      Just the same.
      1. 0
        17 November 2016 08: 28
        Quote: atalef
        Or maybe try to outbid?


        Send them a price list of payments for downed Amerov planes, purely neigh wassat
  13. +4
    17 November 2016 07: 36
    It’s just that the amount of the penalty for each downed American plane exceeds the cash available on the ISL counts.
  14. 0
    17 November 2016 07: 58
    I tried to read the date, one is smeared, the other is not readable, there are no signatures at all ... It’s not clear what the Americans are, did they send them directives by pigeon mail or is it a linden? Inclined to the second. In the courtyard of the XXI century.
  15. 0
    17 November 2016 07: 59
    The paper was signed by one of the leaders of ISIS named Abu Muawiyah.

    Abumua?
  16. 0
    17 November 2016 08: 21
    Clear business, how to bring down the patrons and sponsors? Unheard of business!
  17. 0
    17 November 2016 08: 26
    "The operation in Mosul, for all its bloodshed, is like a terrible theatrical performance, the main victims of which are peaceful Iraqis."

    Who would doubt that. All their military activity lately has been a production for the media. Pay attention to the quality of filming of their military operations, "Titanic" was filmed worse.
  18. 0
    17 November 2016 08: 30
    It is strange that these documents are not in the form of comics ..
  19. +1
    17 November 2016 08: 53
    explicitly states that militants should not shoot down American planes

    Who would doubt that
  20. 3vs
    0
    17 November 2016 09: 16
    And what, someone doubted that there was no regret except for Naglo-Saxon Jewry.
    There will be Syrians, Iraqis, Iranians ..., Russians, Chinese, Ukrainians, for them, the less they will be, the better!
  21. 0
    17 November 2016 09: 20
    This is just awkward proof. What I like most is, for example. If it was written about our country on a piece of paper, it would be ridiculed like a fake, and since the Americans are here, this is clearly not the right bees. It's like on federal channels, when they say that, for example, the agency "Fitch" has lowered the rating of our companies .... at once everyone yells that this is a fake and how it raises the rating so immediately everyone cites it for granted.))))) Well done.
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 09: 43
      Russian planes are self-sustaining, didn’t you know? And watch less Kiselyovskoe TV.
      Personally, I prefer CNN, NBC, BBC, Fox New and Al Jazeera.
      1. 0
        17 November 2016 10: 25
        all the news is the same. There are no independent media. And all of you mentioned were repeatedly found to be lying. If I watch Kiselyov TV this does not mean that I believe him, I can read between the lines
  22. Mwg
    +1
    17 November 2016 09: 23
    Yes, that's not at all surprising. Why ISIS to bring down their own aircraft? )))
  23. 0
    17 November 2016 09: 39
    and what, ishilovites use a ruler when writing?

  24. 0
    17 November 2016 10: 57
    so they wrote ".. you can't bite the hand that feeds you"
  25. +2
    17 November 2016 11: 04
    I think the document is about war tactics.
    If you hit an American plane, there will be revenge: bombers
    demolish everything around indiscriminately. With the B-52, the jokes are bad.
    And so, Americans work precisely. With this ISIS, apparently, they cope,
    often changing positions.
    1. 0
      17 November 2016 15: 35
      Quote: voyaka uh
      I think the document is about war tactics.
      If you hit an American plane, there will be revenge: bombers
      demolish everything around indiscriminately. With the B-52, the jokes are bad.
      And so, Americans work precisely. With this ISIS, apparently, they cope,
      often changing positions.

      Spot on excavators? Or the MSF hospital in Afghanistan?
  26. 0
    17 November 2016 15: 33
    I can’t believe that in the beginning the Iraqis didn’t have a single American man-gun in the warehouses seized by the Ishilovites. Strange not true?
  27. 0
    19 November 2016 05: 49
    All the secret becomes clear, the mattress covers are burnt, I wonder what the representative of the State Department will hum at the briefing ??? Once again, “I don’t know the local business” or “damn Putin himself wrote and threw it up” laughing