About why Russian weapons are the best in the world

15
Just because “everybody says so”, one can say Russia is now cursing the trend. With you channel military review and today we will talk about why the Russian weapon the best in the world.



15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    30 October 2016 13: 22
    If you want to show off in parades - buy American weapons, you have to fight - take the Soviet one. The principle that is valid now and it’s excellent that Russian weapons retained and increased the glory of Soviet weapons.
  2. +3
    30 October 2016 14: 03
    Yes, not such an American weapon to show off with him in parades. Nothing special.
  3. +3
    30 October 2016 14: 13
    Have money, buy American. No money, buy Chinese or Russian. And the fact that the Russian is better is Kiselev TV and Military Secret said? That’s all nonsense. Let them tell the children in kindergarten.
    1. +12
      30 October 2016 14: 42
      Quote: Force
      Have money, buy American. No money, buy Chinese or Russian
      Yeah ... So it is thought, until the moment when at the right moment the beautiful American "military toy" refuses and does not want to save your life. So, in addition to the price, there is also such a thing as reliability, a set of combat and operational qualities, price-quality ratio. And here our RUSSIAN WEAPON is very in high positions.
      Quote: Force
      That’s all nonsense. Let them tell the children in kindergarten.

      Nonsense, this is your story. Judging by the burning "Abrams", in the hands of non-Americans, they burn no worse than our T-72 ... So that you still grow and grow before kindergarten, start with a nursery.
    2. +10
      30 October 2016 14: 43
      Quote: Force
      Have money, buy American. No money, buy Chinese or Russian. And the fact that the Russian is better is Kiselev TV and Military Secret said? That’s all nonsense. Let them tell the children in kindergarten.

      Well, why is this nonsense? An example is an Armata automatic machine, PAK FA, TU-160, etc. ... yes, so far these are not serial samples, but so far. This is about samples. Or do you think that we invent cardboard weapons for our safety? And would countries buy our weapons if they were bad? You can argue that they buy because it’s cheap ... so there is a proverb so-mean pays twice. Sense of a tank that is cheaper than its competitors if it is easily burned in the first collision? And our tanks, helicopters, machine guns are the most fighting in the world and no one complains.
      Would the same Indians invest in the PAK FA project if they did not expect to receive the best IFI in the world? In general, your post that sperlivepolymers, to say the least about anything. Liberal chatter and nothing more.
    3. +1
      30 October 2016 21: 53
      Have money, buy American. No money, buy Chinese or Russian.
      It is noticeable that you have picked up the "truths" in kindergarten. Any thinking person knows that American weapons at exorbitant prices are imposed by the states on their allies and countries that are in direct economic and political dependence on the United States. As the saying goes, "if they don't take it, we'll turn off the gas." Countries that have at least a little bit of independence from the states will always buy Russian weapons. As cheaper, simpler, more reliable, and the best in its combat characteristics.
    4. +1
      30 October 2016 22: 12
      Why did you buy our bmp3, t90. We have air defense for 2 generations. C300 is a generation that is not yet in the United States. But we already have c400 and c500 is on the way. Hypersonic warheads tested. And what they write about the American M4, and the experience of their application can also be read.
  4. BAT
    +2
    30 October 2016 14: 44
    Once it was already. "The armor is strong, and our tanks are fast ...", we will defeat everyone with little blood and on foreign territory ... And at the expense of weapons, duc in skillful hands and a slingshot, a terrible weapon. Our tankers in the Great Patriotic War on their thirty-fours beat the vaunted "Tigers ". Personally, I have a very good attitude towards our weapons. I still remember my AK-74 N.547397. This is not to say that amers have bad and useless weapons altogether. And there are probably specialists too.
    1. 0
      30 October 2016 20: 58
      Why, what did our tankers beat there? You, my friend, would be a pest for such words during the war and under the tribunal. The orders of the Supreme High Command Headquarters must not be violated. Filmmakers have seen enough and books have been read. Military prose is much more modest.
      Order of the NPO of the USSR No. 325 of October 16, 1942
      “On the combat use of tank and mechanized units and formations”

      Study carefully.
  5. +4
    30 October 2016 14: 46
    There’s nothing to talk about! The best weapons of the Jews good Now they will contact and tell who paints the radish underground lol fellow
  6. +1
    30 October 2016 16: 14
    Damn what for the garbage with editing? phrases are repeated and bloopers in the text are terrible what is "Airborne Bomber" ???
    Doesn’t! the text is terribly clumsy!
    1. 0
      30 October 2016 21: 00
      Not. "Bomb Airborne". True. I barely finished reading. Well, you can't write in such a clumsy language!
  7. +2
    30 October 2016 17: 32
    Our enemies taught us to have the best, but only to protect our borders. There is something to break off teeth.
    1. 0
      30 October 2016 21: 01
      Yeah. Will we fight again in Ryazan?
  8. +5
    30 October 2016 17: 58
    Russian weapons are also better because they are in the hands of Russians.