Manufacturer: Tayfun-K armored car successfully passed the tests for bombing and shelling

28
Armored car K63968 "Typhoon-K", made in 2013 g for preliminary tests successfully passed tests for explosions and shelling, reports bmpd with reference to the deputy director of OJSC “Plant of Special Automobiles” (ZSA, Naberezhnye Chelny) Alexander Matveyev





Now the car is restored and used to test new units.

It is noted that the car depicted in the photo “successfully withstood a full cycle of life tests, driving on roads with different 30 coverage, thousands of kilometers (equal to 50 thousands of kilometers in normal operation).”

Manufacturer: Tayfun-K armored car successfully passed the tests for bombing and shelling


After running tests the car was fired from small weapons and tested to undermine, incl. “Charge 6 kg trotyl equivalent under the wheel, proving full compliance with the stated characteristics,” said Matveyev.

According to him, at present, “a transfer case of its own production is being tested by a car, the mileage has already reached 5 thousand kilometers.” This box will be installed on the promising models of equipment developed by the plant.



To date, the Ministry of Defense has already received about 70-t "Tayfunov-K."
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    12 October 2016 12: 39
    Wunderwaffe ukrokaklia and Typhoon-K! What is called "feel the difference"!
    1. +3
      12 October 2016 13: 04
      Quote: aszzz888
      What is called "feel the difference"!

      The machine was built from scratch, we have such an opportunity, and they have no choice but to make fun of what is. Glad that the Defense Ministry took care of such machines, it is better than carrying the relatives of a soldier later. Those who get such an honor will understand.
      1. PAM
        +2
        12 October 2016 13: 51
        testing 6kg of TNT under the wheel is not relevant today (the likelihood of an MPI encountering anti-tank mines when looking at the latest armed conflicts is very small) it would be much more useful to make improvised explosive devices ((or simulate them) under the car and side) such as plastic canisters 10,20, 40 120l. filled with explosives or a pair of landmines from (XNUMXmm) in a bunch.
        1. +3
          13 October 2016 00: 25
          by mercy, such a landmine will lift the tank.
          1. PAM
            0
            13 October 2016 08: 51
            so it is necessary to design all the same taking into account more likely threats. The tank’s bottom is flat and the ground clearance is less, but here it’s a streamlined body (like fellow ) Yes, and is higher.
  2. +9
    12 October 2016 12: 39
    Beautiful car!
    According to him, at present “the transfer case of our own production is being tested on a car
    That is, before there was a box of foreign production? That's right, you have to do everything yourself.
    1. +3
      12 October 2016 13: 26
      Quote: Trevis
      That is, before there was a box of foreign production? That's right, you have to do everything yourself.

      Previously, there was another plant, but now they will do it themselves.
  3. +6
    12 October 2016 12: 43
    I think it would be "fun" inside. But the corps held out. Excellent.
    1. +4
      12 October 2016 12: 52
      it is not clear, tests are still being conducted, and 70 pcs. already entered the Ministry of Defense recourse
      1. +2
        12 October 2016 13: 28
        Quote: DMoroz
        it is not clear, tests are still being conducted, and 70 pcs. already entered the Ministry of Defense

        The equipment is brought and modernized even after adoption. Each party has something new.
      2. +2
        12 October 2016 13: 29
        it was needed back in 1995. It is correct that 70 pieces are already in operation

  4. +3
    12 October 2016 12: 44
    The K63968 Typhoon-K armored car, manufactured in 2013 for preliminary tests, has successfully passed detonation and shelling tests, bmpd reports with reference to Alexander Matveev, deputy director of the Special Vehicles Plant (ZSA, Naberezhnye Chelny).

    Yes! Judging by the photos went to the poor fellow. Well, in principle, a test sample serves for this. Better to identify flaws at the training grounds than in a real battle.
  5. +3
    12 October 2016 12: 45
    Apparently BSh turned out. Well, now we should expect the emergence on its base of new air defense systems, reconnaissance, medical vehicles and something else useful.
  6. +10
    12 October 2016 12: 47
    wheelbarrow in appearance FIRE, handsome. You practice GUT.
  7. +4
    12 October 2016 12: 48
    Typhoon-U must also be tested. Comparative tests have shown that it is easier to maintain and the cross-country ability is better than that of Typhoon-K
    1. 0
      13 October 2016 00: 27
      the same more for the Urals, impressed by "a couple of meters of life" in front of the cabin
  8. +1
    12 October 2016 13: 35
    Research institutes of Steel have worked wonderfully on the reservation.
  9. 0
    12 October 2016 13: 44
    I do not quite understand why upload information about 6kg, so that those who lay put 8
  10. +3
    12 October 2016 13: 46
    6 kilos TNT sheduzha !!! Pleases. You read, it happened that they experience 0,5 kilos and 600 grams each, and erysipelas twists. Six kilos after all ... not sickly.
  11. +3
    12 October 2016 14: 17
    Not bad, but undermining protection should be brought up to 10 kg. In homemade products used now in conflict zones, such power is commonplace.
  12. +1
    12 October 2016 14: 27
    all is well, sorry the video of the explosion was not posted soldier
  13. +4
    12 October 2016 14: 53
    You look and immediately see the "thoroughbred" power.
  14. 0
    12 October 2016 16: 25
    6 kg? Seriously? This is about nothing. An ordinary armored personnel carrier and infantry fighting vehicle can withstand exactly the same. There were plenty of cases in Chechnya.
    A minimum of 8 kg is needed.
    1. +4
      12 October 2016 18: 02
      Nonsense. Never BTR80 can not withstand 6kg of TNT under the wheel - Bronb breaks like cardboard. An infantry fighting vehicle is not much more secure, but it will not survive these 6kg.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        13 October 2016 00: 35
        The BTR-80 in Chechnya fully withstood the TM-62. There was evidence of this. And this is 8 kg.
        Go to google this here http://twower.livejournal.com/616624.html
        1. +1
          13 October 2016 02: 11
          I bullshit over Internet experts who deny the obvious. According to your descent, a googled link shows a BTR80, minced in meat, blown up by a 150mm IED mine. There, from the explosion, in addition to the bottom, he also turned the roof.
  15. 0
    12 October 2016 18: 15
    All the same, I thought that he had been tested for a long time.
  16. 0
    15 October 2016 13: 41
    The car is cool!