Daily Star: Vladimir Putin boasts Russia's military strength, revealing plans for a promising warship

62
New designs of weapons and military equipment always attract the attention of the media. In various publications regularly appear on new developments in various fields. The press monitors the development of projects, and also tries to anticipate the consequences of their development and bringing to operation. Mostly such work is done by serious specialized publications, whose task is to monitor the situation. However, sometimes new projects are considered by less reputable media, which is also of particular interest.

4 August, the British Star Star tabloid published an article written by Henry Holloway with the loud title “Vladimir Putin’s new destroyer equipped with laser guns will be more powerful than any NATO ship.” There is also an equally interesting subtitle: "Vladimir Putin is bragging about Russia's military power, revealing plans for a promising warship".



Such bold theses, as well as subsequent statements by a foreign author, are primarily related to the nature of the publication, which should be classified as tabloid. Nevertheless, the publication of even such newspapers may be of interest from certain points of view. First of all, for the reason that the tabloid press seeks loud statements that meet the needs of its readers in one way or another.



Mr. Holloway writes that the president of Russia wants to rule the seas. Therefore, plans were published concerning the construction of a new, inconspicuous destroyer with a nuclear power plant. The new ship received the designation "Leader". A ship with a nuclear reactor on board will have a displacement of 17,5 thousand tons, literally bristling with various missiles, and also be able to move around the entire World Ocean quickly and unnoticed.

Referring to the Russian news agency TASS, the author of the publication Daily Star writes that a completely new will be installed on the promising "Leader" weapon in the form of laser installations or electromagnetic tools. The use of such systems will help the use of a nuclear reactor that generates enough electricity.

With the mention of some unnamed military analysts, it is argued that the newest Russian warship of the "space age" in terms of weapons and firepower will be superior to any competitors from NATO countries.

Mr. Holloway recalls that the rearmament of the Russian army should cost the country the equivalent of 244 billion pounds. In addition, V. Putin is investing 1,4 trillion pounds in advanced research and development of new technologies. A ship and submarine construction program for the Navy is also being developed and implemented. fleet. According to the Russian Minister of Defense, Sergei Shoigu, during 2016, the shipbuilding industry must transfer to the Navy ships, ships and submarines of various classes and types in the amount of 43 units.

As a confirmation of his words about the Leader project, the British journalist cites the words of American military analyst Dave Majumdar, who is famous for his publications in various publications. The American expert suggests that the ability of the Russian industry to build ships of the type “Leader” in the current economic situation will have unpleasant consequences. In this case, we should expect that the new Russian destroyers will be armed better than any large surface ship of the US Navy.

According to G. Holloway, by the year 2019 the Russian Ministry of Defense intends to complete the development of the project, after which the industry will start building a new type of ship.

The British author calls the “new destroyer of the Kremlin” just the latest and latest development at the moment, which appeared during the new arms race. The latter, in his opinion, takes place against the backdrop of a deteriorating international situation and in anticipation of a hypothetical Third World War. The starting point of current events, manifested in the deterioration of relations between NATO and Russia, the author Daily Star calls the "annexation of the Crimea."

It is noted that there are already some factors that warn of possible risks. Thus, Russia has an almost imperceptible, albeit small, fleet of modern submarines. The appearance of data on such a component of the Navy was a cause for concern for the NATO command. It turned out that the anti-submarine defense systems of the North Atlantic alliance no longer correspond to the existing threats.

Also, foreign experts, not named by G. Holloway, declare that the Kremlin has the means and the will to start a full-scale conflict at any time, literally the next night. It will take only a few hours to deploy a full-fledged attack on Eastern Europe.

***

Like other editions of its category, the Daily Star newspaper has a number of special features. First of all, it is indomitable craving for a wide variety of sensations in various fields. As a result, the authors of the publication pay special attention to the lives of celebrities, various scandals and other "fried topics". For some time now, the events in the international arena have become relevant to the latter.



At present, there is a shaft of publications devoted to a certain “Russian threat” in the foreign press. In some states, such assumptions and fears even reach the point of discussion by the authorities with corresponding consequences. It is quite clear that the tabloid press can not stand aside and also tries to take advantage of current topics that enjoy a certain popularity.

The result of such attempts to fight for the rating are publications like the recent “Putin Putin’s destroyer armed with LASER cannons will 'outgun every NATO vessel'”. In turn, the neighborhood of the military-political "analytics" with gossip, etc. Topical topics attached to new articles are very interesting, and also affects their perception.

In this case, it is necessary to note that the “Leader” project in the case of the recent publication of the Daily Star publication was just another reason for a relevant article that meets the current requirements of the time. Some information about the technical side of the project is given, then suggestions are made, and in the final of the article there are frightening foreign readers theses about the evil plans of the Russian leadership, which at any time can start a war.

Unfortunately, articles with similar theses are currently the norm for foreign media. The press in pursuit of ratings seeks not only to simply touch on “hot” topics, but also to do it by appropriate methods. For example, the situation is viewed from the most frightening point of view, and in the end it leads to terrible conclusions about the reality of the threat and the risks associated with it. As a result, new publications frighten the reader, as well as promote opinions that are popular among the authorities. At the same time, one can hardly expect that when pursuing such goals, newspapers will maintain objectivity.

And yet it should be noted that the title of the article by G. Holloway has a realistic thesis. According to reports, the promising Russian destroyer project 23560 "Leader" can really be at least one of the most powerful warships in the world. It is known that the destroyer will have a displacement of 17,5 thousand tons and in this regard will receive a nuclear power plant capable of providing high performance. The Leader’s armament complex will consist of universal launchers that will allow it to transport several types of missiles up to 60, designed to solve various combat missions. It is expected to use an advanced air defense system, which will include several systems for various purposes.

Thus, a promising Russian ship in its main characteristics can indeed surpass the main competitors of foreign production. This means that in the article for the Daily Star newspaper, there were still realistic assessments of the current situation. At the same time, the expected superiority of the Russian ship over the foreign ones is considered not in the context of the development of technologies and the navy, but as one of the factors that reinforce the hypothetical Russian threat. Nevertheless, for the tabloid press this is a variant of the norm and it is hardly worth expecting anything else from it.


The article "Vladimir Putin's new destroyer armed with LASER cannons will 'outgun every NATO vessel'":
http://dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/535227/Russia-Vladimir-Putin-Navy-Leader-Destroyer-Laser-Guns-NATO-Outgunned-World-War-3
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    5 September 2016 14: 59
    Everyone is worried about the loss of their dominant role in the world, sleep well, we are just updating our Army and Navy ... and the "Leader" is handsome even in the layout.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +14
        5 September 2016 15: 26
        Quote from rudolf
        rudolff Today, 15:07 ↑ New
        Firstly, not beautiful.

        First ugly. Together.
        And then they don’t argue about tastes.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +9
            5 September 2016 18: 28
            If it were "not beautiful, but scary," it would be separate. And in this case, "ugly" is written as one hi
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            6 September 2016 11: 11
            First: beautiful. Second: ours. Third: not yours. Fourthly: this is how it is spelled correctly. PS "punctuation" ...
    2. 0
      6 September 2016 05: 51
      and "Leader" is handsome even in the layout.

      That’s how they will remember him ...
  2. +7
    5 September 2016 15: 04
    It is necessary to correctly emphasize the title of the article: it does not boast, but is proud.
    1. +5
      5 September 2016 20: 09
      hard to be proud of plans
  3. +6
    5 September 2016 15: 08
    Foreign readers, read and sweat in yellow sweat.
  4. +14
    5 September 2016 15: 12
    We are the ones who will make such ships out of shreds of a torn economy! laughing
    1. 0
      6 September 2016 05: 55
      Undoubtedly, more blah blah blah, and there you look and everyone will forget ...
  5. +2
    5 September 2016 16: 39
    I just do not understand one where the GDP is showing off? They sucked "NEWS" from their finger and rejoice.
  6. 0
    5 September 2016 16: 53
    Why do we learn about this from the foreign press?
  7. +25
    5 September 2016 16: 55
    All is correct !!! Yes the ship will move on an air cushion at a speed of Mach 5, carry on board 10 squadrons of 6th generation aircraft, each of which carries two 2nd generation aircraft. The head dreadnought battlecruiser, named "Vladimir Putin", will be launched yesterday and is already preparing to leave the Belarusian Sea. The goal of the campaign will be to destroy democracy in the orphanages of the Baltic countries! wassat
    Typical jaundice from the Yankees! Fuuuuu damn it ...
    In general, those rumors that we had 2-3 years with us now get to them!
    1. 0
      7 September 2016 16: 19
      Have you noticed the indicated amounts? And if you still translate the pounds into dollars? How much is this? Although a sober journalist wrote that?
  8. cap
    +2
    5 September 2016 16: 56
    "Thus, the promising Russian ship in its main characteristics will indeed be able to surpass the main competitors of foreign production. This means that the Daily Star article still contained realistic assessments of the current situation. At the same time, the expected superiority of the Russian ship over foreign ones is not considered in in the context of technological and naval developments, and as one of the factors that reinforce the hypothetical Russian threat.However, for the tabloid press, this is a variant of the norm and could hardly be expected from it.
    Author: Ryabov Kirill "



    This means that the Daily Star article still had realistic assessments of the situation.

    Anecdote in the topic:
    "-Uncle Yasha, I sprayed all the potatoes with dust, and an hour later it rained.
    Do you think the bugs die or not?
    “Sho tell you, Syoma .... they will die or not, I don’t know for sure.”
    But the health they had, they will no longer have ... "
    hi
  9. 0
    5 September 2016 17: 30
    I already wrote about this earlier to Andrey from Chelyabinsk in com. to its part.5 and then a number of experts doubted the veracity of "information from USC about 17,5 thousand tons)?" Now the adversary has confirmed the veracity of my (and the President's) source - HEAVY ATOMIC MISSION CRUISERS OF RUSSIA TO BE OCEAN ZONE !!! Hurray, comrades!
    1. +9
      5 September 2016 22: 04
      Hurray will scream when these ships go into operation.
  10. +13
    5 September 2016 17: 31
    In the depths of the Ural mountains and deep underground in the Siberian tundra, the Death Star is being built secretly with an ionic protoplasm engine and energy and physical shields, which cannot be pierced by existing weapons systems on the planet, weapons mounted on ships have incredible power, the action of which has been recently observed the whole world, and which the Reds disguised as a meteorite fall near Chelyabinsk. According to analysts' assumptions, large-caliber ship shells are capable of inflicting damage on a scale similar to the damage from nuclear weapons of several tens of megatons, but without radioactive contamination of the area.


    wassat I can also write news like this.
  11. 0
    5 September 2016 17: 49
    FEAR EVERYTHING !!! am am am
  12. +4
    5 September 2016 18: 50
    At the moment, there are 15 comments about the article. ... half is clowning, only one efficient one. .... that's all the consequences of canceling the "minuses" .... everyone can now write sheer stupidity. .... and not be afraid to lose in the ranking on the site. .... and that everyone was demoted, well, do not worry, gentlemen admins. .... they will write even more stupidity. .. :-) and get the coveted shoulder straps. .. :-)
    1. 0
      5 September 2016 20: 11
      earlier there would have been 50 stupid comments, and the pluses in the form of a pyramid - the sooner the score by tens
  13. +2
    5 September 2016 18: 51
    Of course, I don’t understand anything in the ships, but please tell me, is it possible that a displacement of 17,5 thousand tons does not pull a cruiser? And by what criteria are ships now divided into destroyers, corvettes, frigates?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        5 September 2016 23: 28
        Single Raiders showed themselves well. ...but. ... yes. .... and what not to build such? Just do not understand how many ties go?
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      5 September 2016 20: 39
      There are some differences (more precisely, they were) and they are not related to the displacement.
      The destroyer is a destroyer squadron, from the name itself it is clear that it should operate with the squadron, group.
      A cruiser is a ship that can carry out missions both as part of a squadron, in a group, and alone, anywhere in the world (the Eagles were conceived of just that).

      It is difficult to say how it is now determined how a cruiser differs from a destroyer.
  14. +1
    5 September 2016 19: 12
    Not passing constipation, enema is required. laughing
    1. +2
      5 September 2016 22: 08
      It is our brake shipbuilding that needs an "enema" to accelerate - with such a rate of construction of ships, we will never have a fleet, but there will be flotillas.
  15. +4
    5 September 2016 19: 20
    Peace be to your home. Gentlemen, why are there such negative comments about this project? I recall the debate about the Armata project, too, many shouted here in the comments that these were all rumors, and RUSSIA was not able to create a completely new battle tank! ( Loudest of all, by the way, the MECHANIC tank specialist proved it! It's been a while since you heard him.) So, don't make any sudden conclusions!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      6 September 2016 05: 58
      Vitaliy-46 Yesterday, 19:20
      Peace be to your home. Gentlemen, why are there such negative comments about this project? I recall the debate about the Armata project, too, many shouted here in the comments that these were all rumors, and RUSSIA was not able to create a completely new battle tank! ( Loudest of all, by the way, the MECHANIC tank specialist proved it! It's been a while since you heard him.) So, don't make any sudden conclusions!
      The mechanic himself at UVZ does not work on the project. He is supposed to deny everything due to the secrecy of the project. And the negative to the "news", because the "leader" is absent even on paper, he exists only in the imagination, for how many a year ...
  16. 0
    5 September 2016 19: 28
    Firstly, a lot can be "hung" on Putin, but you can’t reproach for boasting. Here he boasted about his Volga-21, and only that. But this was enough for all the bosses to sneakily rush to buy this rarity ... : =)
    And secondly, does Russia need a kind of wunderwaffle, a kind of white elephant, over which then everyone will shake, and if something happens it will inadvertently be like "Tirpitz" throughout the war "to defend in the skerries." It will not turn out that "all the eggs are put in one basket"?
    1. 0
      5 September 2016 20: 12
      Before you dream about waffles, you need to at least bring frigates 22350 to your mind, and this is the Leader’s predecessor in the line of ships, starting with the corvette 22380
      1. +1
        5 September 2016 21: 10
        The main problem with new projects is the shipborne air defense system "Polyment-Redut". If the air defense system is brought to the required parameters, then there should be no problems with the construction of a nuclear destroyer. Russia knows how to do nuclear power plants well, but with the production of ship-borne gas turbines, things are bad.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            6 September 2016 17: 19
            So it is necessary to use already proven systems, if there is no confidence in new ones. It was possible to install the Fort-M air defense system and the AK-130 AU on the first ships of the series. The main difference between the new generation air defense system is the use of missiles with an active seeker, which makes it possible to abandon the target illumination radar, but has its drawbacks. The country needs new ships yesterday, not ten years later. In ten years the range of weapons planned for installation will have time to become outdated.
  17. +2
    5 September 2016 20: 29
    Quote: vsoltan
    At the moment, there are 15 comments about the article. ... half is clowning, only one efficient one. .... that's all the consequences of canceling the "minuses" .... everyone can now write sheer stupidity. .... and not be afraid to lose in the ranking on the site. .... and that everyone was demoted, well, do not worry, gentlemen admins. .... they will write even more stupidity. .. :-) and get the coveted shoulder straps. .. :-)


    What did you expect? What clown articles will react seriously?
    Why clown? For example:
    “The new destroyer of Vladimir Putin, equipped with laser guns, will be more powerful than any NATO ship”
    What is it like? Putin’s personal destroyer?
    What kind of laser tool? Where did such a miracle come from? Conclude a supply contract with the green men?
    The article is a set of crazy ideas and assumptions and it is simply silly to treat them seriously, that’s where the clowning comes from.
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    5 September 2016 21: 30
    well, the heart for the Leader is RHYTHM 200 quite compact left for small build
    1. +2
      5 September 2016 22: 31
      Yeah, we should build a house ...
      Personally, it annoys me greatly that the concept of a promising destroyer, its vision and performance characteristics have been changing regularly for the past five years. From a 9-11 kiloton destroyer, it gradually turns into a 17-18 kiloton prodigy. In addition, bookmark terms are constantly shifting. Well, we would have built the frigates of pr.22350 in series so that we could update the fleet at least a bit, but no, the series got up.

      I'm afraid that in a couple of years, at the next naval show, we will be presented with a 25-30 kiloton monster, as always "unparalleled in the world." They will also shout, they say, he will "beat" all the Zamvolts, sink all the Nimtsy and Fords. Only now the bookmark will be planned for 2025-2027 request
  20. 0
    5 September 2016 22: 00
    How pleasant it is to read the Western press lately. Russia and its President are so powerful. They either organize Brexit or plan to occupy Europe. And now here is the "most powerful ship" Lepota :)
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        6 September 2016 12: 45
        Ponamarev announced the start of discussion of the technical design of the ship and the final selection of the power plant

        Both on! But this is the first time I hear about it! Do I understand correctly that the destroyer will be a gas turbine? Hope so hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            6 September 2016 13: 30
            M-yes, there wasn’t such Santa Barbara even around Armata. request
  22. 0
    6 September 2016 01: 16
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br0ugju3BSg
    Another reason to brag!
  23. +1
    6 September 2016 06: 21
    The farther into the forest, the ....
    My resume:
    The Voennoye Obozreniye website is slipping into the status of a yellow press and a propaganda mouthpiece. Not only has the format changed not for the better (Wow! Now on mobile and tablet!), The publications are of a military nature in order to at least somehow justify the "Military" prefix. Articles by respected authors such as Sergei Linnik, Andrey from Chelyabinsk, Engineer technician, Ryabov Kirill, Oleg Kaptsov and others (if you have forgotten anyone) are few and their rating is low (if only the authors are forced to go to an outright scandal), much more interesting is disgusted already Ukraine and the "damned" ...
    I appeal to the site administrators! Think about it! Well, there are interesting articles, albeit with a patriotic tinge, why not publish an article from NVO NG "Su-30 starts and wins" about the experience of participation of the Su-30 in exercises with foreign vehicles? I am not as an advertisement of other resources, but the fact that in the field of weapons and equipment there is a lot of news and REAL analytical articles much higher than the level of the published scribble!
  24. 0
    6 September 2016 08: 53
    It sounds like science fiction, but before WWII, nuclear weapons were fantastic, and after the bombing of the peaceful city of Japan, science fiction became a reality. Therefore, as I said earlier, the choice of nuclear weapons is a strategically correct solution, aimed at concentrating on the ship great energy opportunities for new types of weapons. Yes, not everything will be right away, but the life of such a ship is several decades, and who knows what kind of guns they will put on ships in 20 years. In addition, it is worth considering that we do not have an alternative to YaSU for such a ship.
    1. +1
      6 September 2016 11: 21
      Not yet. Nikola Tesla was not in vain tinkering with electricity.
  25. +1
    6 September 2016 11: 17
    How can I not remember a couple of good sayings ... "The wind blows - the dog barks." "The dog barks - the caravan moves on."
  26. +1
    6 September 2016 11: 20
    It’s time to ignore it. As soon as we show something new, then immediately a rattling of weapons and an attempt to conquer all.
    As Americans rush about with their fifth-generation imperfections, this is a manifestation of peace and democracy.
    Yes, and do not care.
  27. +1
    6 September 2016 14: 15
    Quote: vsoltan
    Single Raiders showed themselves well. ...but. ... yes. .... and what not to build such? Just do not understand how many ties go?


    They didn’t show it, they refused them.
    According to the layout of the "Leader" (?). Such a makoyatka, of course, a cruiser. With the indicated displacement, the nose is long and narrow (there is no volume), and then, the entire volume is eaten by the power plant and the hangar. The ship will turn out to be cramped, complex, ... 5 years will serve as planned for the next 5 years - with the use of strong words and control from local posts, then nuclear safety will come and will issue Ban No. .. on the operation of nuclear power plants. Everything about(((
  28. 0
    6 September 2016 14: 45
    I don’t know how to use lasers, a good idea is a 152 mm long-barrel electrochemical gun with an adjustable projectile and a range of about 100 km .....
    1. 0
      6 September 2016 15: 04
      The railgun is needed. In our forum, as a rule, Urya-patriots are blaming this gun for what it’s worth, but only for the reason that the Americans want to put it on Zamvolt (or they don’t want to, I don’t remember). But in fact, in principle, the future of these weapons hi
      1. 0
        7 September 2016 10: 30
        Swedish weapons are already being put on Zamvolt. Which, God forgive me, is the railgun.
  29. 0
    6 September 2016 14: 58
    The article was not impressed. No specifics. In different ways, it repeats what could be put into one paragraph, and even then - blue dregs. I regret the lost "dislikes". And the fact that the "Leader" is beautiful in the layout is not the merit of the author of the empty article.
    1. 0
      6 September 2016 15: 02
      And the fact that the "Leader" is beautiful in the layout is not the merit of the author of the empty article.

      Beautiful, and in truth. Only for its displacement, it is weakly armed, as for me. Anyway, I'm 146% sure that this is far from the final version of it (if Project 23560 has at least something to do with the Leader) hi
  30. 0
    7 September 2016 10: 29
    They frightened our old men during the Soviet era. Now there is a revenge. We will frighten their "Leaders" with railguns and quantum destructors with matter disintegrators. Let them shake. Our desu was cooked incomparably better than before.
  31. 0
    7 September 2016 16: 21
    Citizens of the "former mistress of the seas" "drink ... boiling water" out of fear!