The story of the motorcyclist and the driver of the car in the suburbs. Why did the federal TV channel need to be so one-sided to cover the events?
News It does not directly concern the military and military-technical sphere, is not related to geopolitical peripetias, economic and food security, but the Military Review decided to submit the material to the readers' court. We are talking about the incident, whose footage was shown on YouTube: probably a drunk driver of a car who did not have enough space on a country road, jumps out from behind the wheel and attacks a passing motorcyclist. The motorcyclist was not one of the timid and "provided" the attacker with a decent response.
It would seem that the incident is settled. The attacker got what he deserved. Thank you all, everyone is free ... But ... I was surprised not so much by the scene from the video as by the reaction of individual media to it, and the media are more than reputable. After it became clear that the driver of the car - a representative of the Moscow Region branch of "United Russia" Alexey Bolshedanov, the information was presented on the TV channel "Russia 1".
Moreover, they presented it in a very peculiar form, so much so that Mr. Bolshedanov was designated as the only victim. Yes, Bolshedanov did suffer, but for some reason only colleagues from the federal television channel did not show the video to the multi-million audience completely, cutting out the most “inconvenient” fragments for the representative of the authorities. Here is the very "cut" material from "Russia 1":
Such a presentation of information, to put it mildly, does not do credit to such a large television channel as Russia, and clearly gives the партн partners ’a reason and in case of publication of objective information by the channel, doubt it, using the video that was presented as“ proof of bias ” above. In strange attempts to whitewash the violator of the law and set information clearly from one side, the channel’s reputation is already undergoing serious tests.
It would seem that the incident is settled. The attacker got what he deserved. Thank you all, everyone is free ... But ... I was surprised not so much by the scene from the video as by the reaction of individual media to it, and the media are more than reputable. After it became clear that the driver of the car - a representative of the Moscow Region branch of "United Russia" Alexey Bolshedanov, the information was presented on the TV channel "Russia 1".
Moreover, they presented it in a very peculiar form, so much so that Mr. Bolshedanov was designated as the only victim. Yes, Bolshedanov did suffer, but for some reason only colleagues from the federal television channel did not show the video to the multi-million audience completely, cutting out the most “inconvenient” fragments for the representative of the authorities. Here is the very "cut" material from "Russia 1":
Such a presentation of information, to put it mildly, does not do credit to such a large television channel as Russia, and clearly gives the партн partners ’a reason and in case of publication of objective information by the channel, doubt it, using the video that was presented as“ proof of bias ” above. In strange attempts to whitewash the violator of the law and set information clearly from one side, the channel’s reputation is already undergoing serious tests.
Information