After filming a talk show on TVC, a Ukrainian "activist" was beaten up, justifying the burning of people in the House of Trade Unions of Odessa
The invitation of the Ukrainian "partners" to the Russian airs led to what should have resulted. Scandal, fists, abuse, etc. That is exactly what happened after the TVC channel broadcast, to which, among others, ex-deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Igor Markov, an activist of Novorossia Konstantin Dolgov, a representative of the maydanut Ukrainian segment, who got for speaking about the Odessa tragedy, and other political analysts who were current policies. On the air with the mentioned guest talk show on the TVC will be released on Monday. About the fight said a man who was also present on one of the TVC airs - Rostislav Ischenko. We give his post completely.
Ishchenko in Facebook writes:
In social networks there were reports that Igor Markov beat the head of the movement "Union of Ukrainians of Russia" Viktor Girzhov.
One of the leaders of Antimaydan, Yury Kot, who was present on the air, writes:
And for what purpose did Mr. Girzhov, knowing his position promoted, be invited to the TVC channel? Such freedom of speech or the pursuit of a rating?
Ishchenko in Facebook writes:
Yesterday, after recording the program “The Right to Vote”, Igor Markov beat a representative of Ukrainians in Russia. It must be said that the beaten one made an impression of an intellectual invalid who simply did not understand what he was carrying and seemed noble to himself — the living embodiment of the maxim "to be without a prophet in his own country." I, in principle, do not approve of beating, as a method of educating an adult opponent. In addition, I believe that I sufficiently own other means of annihilating enemies, not only and not so much destroying their physical shell, as destroying their ideological basis, so as not to stoop to a massacre. But, first, everyone is at war, as he can and therefore, I cannot condemn Igor. Secondly, this case is exceptional for me, since the object of the educational measures taken was clearly inadequate. That is, it was impossible to have a discussion with him as usual, since he initially accepted as an axiom that black is white and white
black That is, for him it was originally moral, that which is immoral for us and that which is moral for us is immoral. One example, the object of education more than ten times on the direct indication that among the burned in Odessa were women and children responded that the "pro-Russian" activists "were the first to start." From his point of view, this was an exhaustive justification for the actions of the Nazis in Odessa. He did not even bother to give other arguments. Only "first started". That is why I think that Igor has absolutely nothing to reproach. If a person rejects a reasoned discussion, but at the same time supports and promotes absolute evil, then society takes to it physical measures of influence. In Israel, this is a concern of the state, which for the propaganda of Nazism regularly jailed, so there Nazism is not advocated. In Russia, this mission is carried out by individual civil activists. The cases of physical pressure on the Nazis and the sub-Nazis are increasing. And given the fact that after the murder of Elderberry from Ukraine, the next wave of activists ran to Russia, there will be even more. The fact is that when we fled right after the coup, we knew that the junta would kill, torture, rot in prisons, but we didn’t have time to face it. We fought and are conducting our war in the information sphere. That is, like all Russian society, we see the blood and dirt of the junta, empathize with the victims and dream of a quick victory. But still, the war on TV and the war in the trenches are not the same thing.
And the war in the enemy's rear, and even when you have a family in your arms - the most unpleasant. So, people will come (already arrive), on themselves and their loved ones who have experienced the horror of communication with the junta, who have lost friends. And they will relate to the "experts" discussing the absence of fascism in Ukraine as the front-line soldiers in June 1945 of the "expert" would say, who would say that there was no fascism in Germany, but a legitimate, democratically elected government of the German people. They will beat. To beat cruelly and not thinking about the consequences. Moreover, the phenomenon risks becoming so widespread that the Russian law enforcement system may not cope with it. Police officers and prosecutors are also people and they live in the same country. And it seems that the Nazi remote lovers, who prefer to justify the Ukrainian gangsters from Moscow, have already understood this. In any case, when Igor raised his political opponent, the other fans of Ukrainian Nazism, suddenly remembered that there was an urgent matter for Roman Babayan and crowded him in the dressing room with absolutely pale faces. Our would go to protect their. They (although no one was going to beat them) rushed to save their skins. And it is encouraging. Yes, and I specifically do not call the names of the defenders of Nazism. Those who wish to see them on Monday in the transfer, and once again do not want to promote the villains.
black That is, for him it was originally moral, that which is immoral for us and that which is moral for us is immoral. One example, the object of education more than ten times on the direct indication that among the burned in Odessa were women and children responded that the "pro-Russian" activists "were the first to start." From his point of view, this was an exhaustive justification for the actions of the Nazis in Odessa. He did not even bother to give other arguments. Only "first started". That is why I think that Igor has absolutely nothing to reproach. If a person rejects a reasoned discussion, but at the same time supports and promotes absolute evil, then society takes to it physical measures of influence. In Israel, this is a concern of the state, which for the propaganda of Nazism regularly jailed, so there Nazism is not advocated. In Russia, this mission is carried out by individual civil activists. The cases of physical pressure on the Nazis and the sub-Nazis are increasing. And given the fact that after the murder of Elderberry from Ukraine, the next wave of activists ran to Russia, there will be even more. The fact is that when we fled right after the coup, we knew that the junta would kill, torture, rot in prisons, but we didn’t have time to face it. We fought and are conducting our war in the information sphere. That is, like all Russian society, we see the blood and dirt of the junta, empathize with the victims and dream of a quick victory. But still, the war on TV and the war in the trenches are not the same thing.
And the war in the enemy's rear, and even when you have a family in your arms - the most unpleasant. So, people will come (already arrive), on themselves and their loved ones who have experienced the horror of communication with the junta, who have lost friends. And they will relate to the "experts" discussing the absence of fascism in Ukraine as the front-line soldiers in June 1945 of the "expert" would say, who would say that there was no fascism in Germany, but a legitimate, democratically elected government of the German people. They will beat. To beat cruelly and not thinking about the consequences. Moreover, the phenomenon risks becoming so widespread that the Russian law enforcement system may not cope with it. Police officers and prosecutors are also people and they live in the same country. And it seems that the Nazi remote lovers, who prefer to justify the Ukrainian gangsters from Moscow, have already understood this. In any case, when Igor raised his political opponent, the other fans of Ukrainian Nazism, suddenly remembered that there was an urgent matter for Roman Babayan and crowded him in the dressing room with absolutely pale faces. Our would go to protect their. They (although no one was going to beat them) rushed to save their skins. And it is encouraging. Yes, and I specifically do not call the names of the defenders of Nazism. Those who wish to see them on Monday in the transfer, and once again do not want to promote the villains.
In social networks there were reports that Igor Markov beat the head of the movement "Union of Ukrainians of Russia" Viktor Girzhov.
One of the leaders of Antimaydan, Yury Kot, who was present on the air, writes:
Igor scattered all those who stood in the way between him and the Nazi machine (20 meters ran), took off on the hood, jumped to the door and tried to rush into the salon to punish the fascist reptile for these threats. At that time I was uprooting the door from the back side and began to pull it out into the light of God for (...) to talk.
And for what purpose did Mr. Girzhov, knowing his position promoted, be invited to the TVC channel? Such freedom of speech or the pursuit of a rating?
Information