ATTENTION! Warning Roskomnadzor banning the use of mat in articles and comments

January 19 2015 226

Dear Readers,

ATTENTION! Warning Roskomnadzor banning the use of mat in articles and comments

Information and analytical portal "Military Review" informs that the editorial office received a warning from Roskomnadzor. The warning concerns the presence in the comments of obscene words and expressions that are not allowed to be published in the media. Since December 2013, the site topwar.ru has official media status. By order of Roskomnadzor, the site may terminate its information and analytical activities and be blocked for readers using obscene words in comments to articles.

At the moment, the situation is such that the search engines indexed numerous pages with obscene comments. That is what is the reason for the claims of Roskomnadzor. “Yandex” is excellently “trained” to search in texts not only frank, but also a veiled mat (diluting the letters of the abusive word with dots without reducing the number of letters in the word itself, using the Latin alphabet, etc.).

We draw readers' attention to the fact that in the published comments using obscene language is not allowed! In no form! Readers of the Military Review who violate this rule, who try to circumvent special filters with the help of clever tricks, will be "banned" without warning!

The editorial board of VO asks readers to get rid of their penchant for swearing and to place on the pages of the publication comments of an exceptionally “censor-like” character - without the mat and without its veiled forms. In the Russian language there are enough literary words to express the most powerful emotions.

Thank you for understanding!

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Starik72

0

20 January 2015 03: 28

Moderators, is it ...... an obscene word in my comment.
Starik72

0

20 January 2015 03: 33

Moderators. How will you censor such an expression: Send a fool to God to pray, he’ll even break his forehead.
Nikolaevich I

+1

20 January 2015 04: 26

Attention! Programmers-hackers! Aw! I urgently need to create a translator program for home use: you get a “comment” with the words “condom”, “feces”; and the “translator” gives: “ha........", "ho...... ..". And that’s it: life goes on! The balance of nature is restored! P.S. Apparently the racial officials “from culture and education” are haunted by I. Strelkov’s “famous” order to prohibit “swearing” in the militia! What happened from this?
Support

0

20 January 2015 10: 08

Ban on swearing? It's like an ostrich hiding its head in the sand..... Are they ashamed of strong expressions? Are the girls red? They also call themselves a military site. Smells bad - liberals.....
Yasondinalt

0

20 January 2015 10: 34

Well, that's right. Let them waste their time on feces out of impotence. It's just that sometimes messages like this come across...
Morozov

+2

20 January 2015 15: 53

Yes, actually there are no problems. All swearing, he... is due to lack of culture, as one smart uncle said. If someone can’t bear to read Yesenin’s poems, quote Goethe, familiarize themselves with medical terms or the practice of mating in cynology, then what’s the question?! Discuss your “knowledge” and pour out your emotions on sites of interest. As I understand it, the journal Military Review is here and topics of a completely different nature are discussed here. And for another purpose.
Forest

0

20 January 2015 16: 29

It’s high time. After all, general degradation begins with speech.
Russ_Dry

0

21 January 2015 01: 48

I agree that swearing is not good. I can even guess about the possible motives for such a ban (besides the declared struggle for the culture of speech). But the following puzzles my brain:
1) RoskomBomTamSyamVamNadzor is doing who knows what
2) It follows from point 1: The state decides what and how to say to me. Let me explain: if the young schoolboy Vasya Pupkin insults the respected Pyotr Petrovich Petrov, then this is the subject of litigation between these two citizens. And in no way a subject of interest to the State.
3) Our prohibitionist organizations (and other prohibitionists), instead of engaging in productive work, act on the principle of simple pop stars: “do whatever you want so that they will say as much as possible from you.”
1. iConst
  
  0
  
  21 January 2015 12: 06
  
  Quote: Russ_Dry
  but the following is bothering me:
  ...
  2) It follows from point 1: The state decides what and how to say to me. Let me explain: if the young schoolboy Vasya Pupkin insults the respected Pyotr Petrovich Petrov, then this is the subject of litigation between these two citizens. And in no way a subject of interest to the State.
  ...
  
  I’ll try to explain: There are concepts: culture and lack of culture.
  If the culture is not grafted, degradation is observed.
  
  So, returning to the “showdown”: Who and how to defend the honor and dignity of, for example, a professor from a shitty student? Fight? Do it yourself or call relatives?
  
  This is a question.
Russ_Dry

0

21 January 2015 22: 37

Quote: iConst
If the culture is not grafted, degradation is observed.

Of course, culture needs to be instilled. but in my opinion this should be done by mom and dad during the citizen’s childhood, and by society when the citizen becomes an adult.
I agree that the state should regulate many things, but it shouldn’t go too far. And if we are to instill a culture of communication, then the State can begin by ridding the language of unnecessary foreignisms. the abundance of which, especially in the speech of public people like politicians and cultural figures, turns Russian speech into surzhik.
Let me explain, we are consolidating efforts instead of uniting them, conducting research at the research site, demanding transparency instead of transparency, and now we don’t have power outages, we have blackouts, and if we continue about “outs,” then now we are not “disgraced to the whole world,” but coming out.

Quote: iConst
Who and how to defend the honor and dignity of, for example, a professor from a shitty student? Fight? Do it yourself or call relatives?

culturally defend. for example, sue. Can a citizen sue another citizen? Then why does the State get involved here? We have few places where the State really must show yourself?
Gunther

0

14 October 2015 22: 57

On the subject:
point 1. The leader (Roskomnadzor) is always right.
point 2. If the leader (Roskomnadzor) is wrong, see point 1.
Article plus, we'll hit the mat with a ban.
Quote: Vadim Smirnov
Yes, you are an angel! A I'm apparently a radish - bad person.

Well, you called yourself a radish. I will not argue.
But why did they modernize my wonderful avatar?
I've eaten. I reasoned logically (logic is my strong point, well, with the exception of O. Kaptsov’s article about battleships).
At first I thought that the bayonet had knocked - I was offended that he was not alone in the Vatican.
No longer needed. He's a bayonet, after all.
Maybe the “chosen people” thought that my positive havka was not kosher enough?
So it’s an avatar, but it’s an optimistic, cheerful avatar, playing off Albesha E.’s tongue hanging out.
Is tolerance growing?
By the way, whoever was offended by the awka, maybe I can convey in a personal message that the awka is positive.
Just tell me what exactly is intolerant in avka, if there is a rope, then I have a graphic editor installed on my tablet, I will cross the rope with a cross. Will it be so tolerant?
I LIKE AVKA SO MUCH.
PS
And then immediately a warning, you need to be more tolerant.