Field-21 radio suppression system adopted in Russia

60
Russia has adopted the latest Pole-21 radio suppression system, which is capable of protecting strategically important objects from cruise missiles, guided bombs, as well as from drones enemy. The newspaper reports "News". The “Field-21” system allows you to “jam” the signals traveling on a variety of satellite channels, including GPS, Galileo and Beidou.

The developer of Fields-21 is JSC STC EW (JSC Scientific and Technical Center for Electronic Warfare), established in Moscow 2005, and having the Voronezh branch of the Center for System Research and Development (R & D).



Scientific and Technical Center electronic warfare defines the main purpose of the Field-21 system as follows:

It is intended to cover the most important objects of the armed forces and the country's infrastructure by radio suppressing the equipment of consumers of global satellite navigation systems in the designated area.


It is noted that the customer himself can choose a range of suppressed receiving means.

From the technical characteristics of the radio suppression system:

Number of radio interference posts - up to 100;
the number of radio interference modules at one post - 1-3;
post management tools - GPS, cable and radio communications;
the time of transmission of the control command and receiving reports on the status and mode of operation of the radio interference post (excluding the delay in GSM channels) - no more than 3 s;
dimensions of the area of ​​radio suppression of receiving facilities of the SRNS - 150х150 km;
suppression range of receivers of the SRNS radio interference module - at least 25 km;
the energy potential of the radio interference module in the maximum radiation pattern in the single-frequency mode - 300 W - 1 kW;
the width of the radio jamming sector of the radio interference module in the azimuthal plane, not less than - 125 °, in the elevation plane, variable within the limits - 25 °;
power consumption of radio interference control equipment - 600 W;
operating temperatures from –40 to + 50 Celsius;
Type of interference: phase-targeted manipulated by a pseudo-random sequence.


Field-21 radio suppression system adopted in Russia


Remotely controlled maintenance-free radio interference modules of the Field-21 system can be placed on cell towers at altitudes up to 60 m.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    25 August 2016 08: 56
    Our electronics are on top. It is only necessary to cherish and groom our specialists, remembering that they can be lured.
    1. +11
      25 August 2016 09: 00
      Simple, affordable and tasteful, and there are many radio base stations throughout Russia.
      1. +5
        25 August 2016 09: 09
        Quote: cniza
        Simple, affordable and tasteful, and there are many radio base stations throughout Russia.
        ... how to live in the best Russian traditions ... as when Lefthander used to do mechanical overseas flea ... hi
  2. jjj
    +6
    25 August 2016 08: 57
    The saying: "If you walked in the field" acquires a second meaning. Ours, as I think, are beginning to get the trump cards in store from the sleeve. Let it itch in NATO and Washington
    1. 0
      25 August 2016 13: 07
      In general, as a rule, such serious inventions are not talked about at every corner, but are silent in a rag. If only this is not misleading the enemy.
  3. +8
    25 August 2016 09: 02
    Well now I know which electronic warfare system will knock out my cell phone at the right time. smile
    1. +2
      25 August 2016 12: 25
      Well now I know which electronic warfare system will knock out my cell phone at the right time.

      The right moment for what? Call the U.S. Embassy? wink
      1. +6
        25 August 2016 13: 14
        The right moment for what? Call the U.S. Embassy?


        1. +2
          25 August 2016 16: 22
          request I did not understand, to my innocent question to an indistinct comment, a more indistinct answer and then "+" a person, for what ???
  4. +1
    25 August 2016 09: 05
    post management tools - GPS, cable and radio communications;


    Cable and radio communication is understandable ..... why is GPS also used and not our Glonas ... especially for control signals? the enemy, too, will not sit exactly on the train. Everything must be your own
    1. +2
      25 August 2016 09: 20
      Are you going to suppress your own signal?
      The enemy does not sit still for a long time and does not rely on GPS and radio communications for a long time. For example
      1. 0
        25 August 2016 09: 34
        Professor, isn’t GPS used in your army?
        1. +4
          25 August 2016 09: 51
          Professor, isn’t GPS used in your army?

          GPS is used as an aid, not a panacea. The same Spice or Dalilah is an example.

          A professor, like a smart man, and you're trying to mow everything under the fool.

          This is "an adult". wassat

          First, you need to go through the air defense zone. S400. C500 is on its way. Airplanes also, I suppose, need GPS positioning. The more complex the bomb, the more "brains" it has. The more vulnerable it becomes for an ordinary sledgehammer.

          Not having a tax in the world of S-400, which is a descendant of the unsettled world of S-300 is also not a panacea. Not a single air defense is able to protect the object from destruction, and it is not intended for this. Or didn’t you know? wink
          Airplanes, as you have deigned to put it, GPS positioning is required, but it is not possible for them to jam the satellite signal due to the laws of physics, and the Pole-21 system even more so. Learn materiel.
          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Israeli_Air_Force_F-15D_Baz
          _957_1.jpg
          1. +7
            25 August 2016 10: 04
            Jamming GPS aircraft is not necessary, because aircraft are the task of air defense forces. But jamming GPS when approaching a target for a rocket is the right option. Because GPS is much cheaper than inertia. Accordingly, this is simply protection against an attack by a mass of cheap missiles. Didn’t they know?)
            1. +3
              25 August 2016 10: 44
              Jamming GPS aircraft is not necessary, because aircraft are the task of air defense forces. But jamming GPS when approaching a target for a rocket is the right option. Because GPS is much cheaper than inertia. Accordingly, this is simply protection against an attack by a mass of cheap missiles. Didn’t they know?)

              I didn’t suggest jamming GPS for airplanes. Jamming GPS signals in the immediate vicinity of the object will not hurt. Why not. Inertial is no more expensive than a GPS receiver. Both cost a penny. And the most important thing:
              In Russia adopted the latest radio suppression system "Field-21", which is able to protect strategically important objects from cruise missiles, guided bombs, and also from enemy drones.
              What are cheap destruction rockets STRATEGIC facility? For such a trifle no one will. hi
          2. +3
            25 August 2016 10: 07
            Einstein somewhere in the next world is spinning in a coffin, as in one famous joke where you studied physics, dear. You are too lazy to argue with you, you will have to start from scratch ...
          3. 0
            25 August 2016 10: 28
            "Blessed is he who believes." "There will be a surprise."
          4. 0
            25 August 2016 13: 20
            Quote: professor
            Teach materiel.
            https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Israeli_Air_Force_F-15D_Baz
            _957_1.jpg


            Taught, taught, taught, taught. laughing
            1. 0
              25 August 2016 19: 00
              Taught, taught, taught, taught

              More thorough is necessary, more thorough. bully
          5. +1
            25 August 2016 21: 00
            E, dear, we then know one air defense system that saved the object from destruction. Moscow Air Defense, 1941. Unlike all the bombed European capitals. Believe me, I’ve beaten the world of S-300 for so many years that it wouldn’t seem enough. And the raid conditions were such that in real raids you can’t build much. It is painfully expensive and takes a long time to prepare.
            1. 0
              26 August 2016 14: 03
              Believe me, I’ve beaten the world of S-300 for so many years that it wouldn’t seem enough.

              At the training ground? wink
      2. +4
        25 August 2016 09: 34
        A professor, like a smart guy, and you're trying to mow everything like a fool. Defense is a complex concept. First, you need to go through the air defense zone. S400. C500 is on its way. Airplanes, too, probably need GPS positioning. The more complex the bomb, the more "brains" it has. The more vulnerable it becomes for an ordinary sledgehammer.
      3. 0
        25 August 2016 10: 49
        and what, the air defense of the Russian Federation is so leaky that they will allow enemy aircraft to fly before spice launches in Moscow?
        These are weapons against the Kyrgyz Republic that operate in the rear. And this is not a panacea, since an inertial system can work without gps and radio communications.
        1. +3
          25 August 2016 10: 58
          and what, the air defense of the Russian Federation is so leaky that they will allow enemy aircraft to fly before spice launches in Moscow?
          These are weapons against the Kyrgyz Republic that operate in the rear. And this is not a panacea, since an inertial system can work without gps and radio communications.


          Are we bombing Moscow already? Oh well. Then let's discuss old and not good Tomahawks and how "Field-21" can prevent them. Answer: "Nothing." TERCOM, a system based on the so-called technology for correlating the display of an object with its reference digital image (DSMAC), it will not drown out CRPA.
          1. 0
            25 August 2016 15: 53
            If it does interfere in some way, then the same Tomahawk will be equipped with Pole-21 homing on radiation. Is that possible?
  5. +5
    25 August 2016 09: 07
    Have time! We managed to do this. Thanks to everyone involved.
  6. +2
    25 August 2016 09: 16
    One wish: do not stop there and bring to life without barriers, for the good of the country ess-no.
  7. 0
    25 August 2016 09: 39
    And why did they post the photos? One information could be dispensed with ..
    1. +2
      25 August 2016 21: 30
      Do you seriously think that this is a photo of the emitters of the Field?
  8. +1
    25 August 2016 09: 57
    Means of counteracting systems are always cheaper than means of overcoming them. In defense, electronic warfare (REP) facilities are effective and less costly relative to the “partners” expensive high-precision precision weapons.
  9. +4
    25 August 2016 10: 05
    Quote: professor
    The enemy does not sit still for a long time and does not rely on GPS and radio communications for a long time.

    Please indicate by what means communication is carried out in Israel, otherwise they only repeat in your video - GPS, GPS, GPS. Yes, and in the credits too. Judging by your delight, you get the feeling that there, in Israel, telepaths, like in Babylon-5, control planes, missiles and bombs.
    1. +2
      25 August 2016 10: 50
      1. You are like in that joke, while everyone was learning English, you were learning to swim. wink
      You are clearly told in the video: "... he is not afraid of GPS jammers."
      2. No enthusiasm. Just a statement of facts.
      3. Manage in different ways. Depending on specific threats.
      1. +1
        25 August 2016 11: 39
        1. The aircraft still needs to fly, by the way using GPS, and the pilot will also use the radio station, and this is not the main thing.
        2. What a surprise will be after the launch of the rocket, there are already other tools developed specifically for devices working on predetermined target coordinates. Since the coordinates you imagine are also laid in electronic brains, which can simply fade from the effects of a strong electromagnetic pulse. But that's another story...
        3. In the end, the missile simply cannot reach the target.
        So the system is not designed as a panacea, but simply as an addition to the devices already created. Teach materiel if you find it in the public domain. Successes.
        1. +1
          25 August 2016 11: 50
          1. The aircraft still needs to fly, by the way using GPS, and the pilot will also use the radio station, and this is not the main thing.

          How will you jam? wink


          2. What a surprise will be after the launch of the rocket, there are already other tools developed specifically for devices working on predetermined target coordinates. Since the coordinates you imagine are also laid in electronic brains, which can simply fade from the effects of a strong electromagnetic pulse. But that's another story...

          What are the predefined coordinates of the target "in Spice or Tomahawk? Learn materiel and do not talk nonsense, otherwise we will start to protect missiles with a Faraday cage from" the impact of a strong electromagnetic pulse. " wassat

          3. In the end, the missile simply cannot reach the target.

          It may not fly. 100% no one guarantees. Therefore, several missiles are fired at the same target.
      2. +4
        25 August 2016 11: 43
        Professor says that for a long time there have been 3D maps in addition to satellite positioning and other methods of determining one's location (no one has forbidden the astrolabe yet!), so all these systems are like a blanket for children: I covered myself and I was like in the "House" from terrible insidious night monsters ... Budget sawed, orders received, and war, perhaps - will not be!
        Hundreds of thousands (in missile-hazardous areas) of cheap UAVs made of PVC panels with Needles / Willows (or their cheaper versions) will be more serious protection from subsonic missiles, helicopters and UAVs. Strategic objects can also be protected by them.
  10. +1
    25 August 2016 11: 14
    Quote: professor
    Inertial is no more expensive than a GPS receiver. <...>
    What are cheap destruction rockets STRATEGIC facility? For such a trifle no one will. hi

    You are mistaken. Inertia is incomparably more expensive than GPS / GLONASS guidance.
    They won't waste time on trifles, but you shouldn't think that rockets are an unlimited resource. In the event of hostilities, "smart" missiles (that is, with electronic warfare, maneuvering, etc.) will be launched under the cover of a mass of cheap missiles in order to increase the probability of a missile defense breakthrough by "smart" missiles.

    However, I do not pretend to be expert in the issue of military tactics, but I see it that way. In any case, a cool and useful device.
    1. +1
      25 August 2016 11: 32
      You are mistaken. Inertia is incomparably more expensive than GPS / GLONASS guidance.

      No, I’m not mistaken. The same penny.
      VN-100 Rugged



      They won't waste time on trifles, but you shouldn't think that rockets are an unlimited resource. In the event of hostilities, "smart" missiles (that is, with electronic warfare, maneuvering, etc.) will be launched under the cover of a mass of cheap missiles in order to increase the probability of a missile defense breakthrough by "smart" missiles.

      The number of strategic objects is always less than the means of their destruction. How many nuclear power plants, dams, airfields do you have?
      1. +1
        25 August 2016 11: 55
        We seem to be talking about military equipment, not crafts for a hobby. Your "toy" lives (working temperature, and, worse, storage) in the range of -40 +85, and the military range -60 +125, if you forgot. Yes, and data on the price is not given, really.
        1. 0
          25 August 2016 19: 05
          We seem to be talking about military equipment, not crafts for a hobby. Your "toy" lives (working temperature, and, worse, storage) in the range of -40 +85, and the military range -60 +125, if you forgot. Yes, and data on the price is not given, really.

          Really? Look, what is written about "Field-21" in this article:
          working temperatures - from -40 to + 50 centigrade;

          And the price is even easier. Hyposcope today is in every smartphone. Although not military, it costs a cent since the entire hardware of the smartphone does not cost more than $ 50.
          1. +1
            25 August 2016 21: 28
            Hm! And what is the accuracy of such chiroscopes? I’m afraid that if you use them for serious equipment, you’ll not only fall into a 9-story building at a hundred kilometer distance, but even in its surroundings you will have to try. This is in conditions not using a ballistic trajectory, but a trajectory with a change in course. Your bragging and arrogance is something ...! How many Israel launched independent space launches? And the second question: If Israeli technology is as cool as you try to show here all the time, then why is it not yet sold in such volumes that it would become the most belligerent.
            I respect Israeli developments, but all of it is not designed for long-term positional operation, but rather for short-term operations ala mission, or operation near service bases. In conditions of prolonged positional confrontations with irregular supply and maintenance, the more complex the technique, the faster you will find yourself with bare hands. Apparently for this, the most belligerent are those types of weapons that are simpler, unpretentious in maintenance and therefore more reliable. As for any "jammers", they are intended only for initial actions and counteractions, no one says that this is a panacea.
            As for "not shooting down a single C300, C400 ..." maybe that's why they didn't shoot down anyone just because the "bad guys" stay away from them? In contrast: name at least one object destroyed in the area of ​​operation of these systems?
            1. +1
              27 August 2016 08: 25
              Hm! And what is the accuracy of such chiroscopes? I’m afraid that if you use them for serious equipment, you’ll not only fall into a 9-story building at a hundred kilometer distance, but even in its surroundings you will have to try. This is in conditions not using a ballistic trajectory, but a trajectory with a change in course.

              Is it you so about having no tax in the world Iskander? After all, it is induced exclusively by gyroscopes. wink

              How many Israel launched independent space launches? And the second question: If Israeli technology is as cool as you try to show here all the time, then why is it not yet sold in such volumes that it would become the most belligerent.

              Israel has done enough, and the bourgeoisie have launched more of you, and the number of successful launches by the same French is beyond competition. Just what does this have to do with the article under discussion, how and who sold the most weapons? America sells more to you, so what? request

              I respect Israeli developments, but all of it is not designed for long-term positional operation, but rather for short-term operations, ala mission, or operation near service bases. In conditions of prolonged positional confrontations with irregular supply and maintenance, the more complex the technique, the faster you will find yourself with your bare hands. Apparently this is the most warring weapons that are simpler, unpretentious in maintenance and therefore more reliable.

              Rave. Mercedes is much more complicated than Zaporozhets, but also much more reliable. Reliability does not lie in simplicity, but in the height of engineering and the quality of its execution.

              As for "not shooting down a single C300, C400 ..." maybe that's why they didn't shoot down anyone just because the "bad guys" stay away from them? In contrast: name at least one object destroyed in the area of ​​operation of these systems?

              I can show you the failures of your panacea even in exercises.
      2. 0
        26 August 2016 21: 59
        go to the opra Arabs to help you
  11. +3
    25 August 2016 11: 41
    Break, gentlemen. Why are you as rectangular as a circle? They put into service a system that allows you to localize, both selectively frequencies in a wide range and certain frequency ranges. What problems? It is necessary to be glad that the troops receive the next complex where customer can choose a range suppressed receiving means. .
  12. +1
    25 August 2016 12: 18
    Quote: darksoul
    why is GPS also used and not our Glonas ... especially for control signals? the enemy, too, will not sit exactly on the train. Everything must be your own

    Will be!!! Be a spock, dear !!! All Yes will be!!! I’m telling you as a doctor! wink
  13. +1
    25 August 2016 12: 19
    Quote: avg-mgn
    the troops receive another complex where the customer can choose the range of suppressed receiving equipment. .

    And it's worth it !!! good
  14. 0
    25 August 2016 12: 23
    Quote: professor
    The enemy does not sit still for a long time and does not rely on GPS and radio communications for a long time.

    Yes, for a tricky kidney there is always a good FIG with a screw bully
  15. +3
    25 August 2016 12: 40
    Two warheads are flying ... Russian and American
    Met and start talking ...
    -Russian says: Can we drink vodka?
    -American replies: Let's have a drink
    drank for that for se - for the friendship of peoples for world peace
    Russian people do not understand where the Russian bomb
    American, too, do not understand ...
    half an hour has passed
    American and says - everything - I got drunk - I won’t reach the goal
    And the Russian bomb says to the American:
    -Okay, let me see you home. =)
  16. +2
    25 August 2016 12: 50
    To the professor

    but tell me, why is there not a single idiot in the world who wants to check "how does not shoot down the S-400"?))))

    Are you sure you know EVERYTHING about the S-300 and about the S-400?
  17. +3
    25 August 2016 13: 21
    Quote: professor
    Are you going to suppress your own signal?
    The enemy does not sit still for a long time and does not rely on GPS and radio communications for a long time. For example

    Is this such a joke on video? Who will give carriers 100 km closer to the goals?

    The announcer carries some enchanting nonsense: "The bomb is launched outside the air defense." What deb * fishing is this designed for ?? The range of sane air defense systems, for example, Russian-made, many times exceeds 100 km, moreover, they are layered.

    And how much is this wonderful miracle? The secret of the company, but you cook your money)
    «The main disadvantage of the" Spice "ammunition is its high cost relative to GPS-guided munitions. "

    This very clever bomb looks like: a) The elusive Joe, who didn’t give up to anyone, and therefore the elusive (except Israel and Greece, no one ignited the desire to buy them); b) ripped off Israeli taxpayers and naive Papuans in order to get a gesheft on stunted 150 kg bombs for big shekels by cunning Jewish guys.
    1. 0
      25 August 2016 18: 10
      It is difficult for an air defense system to compete at a maximum distance with an airplane and other flying objects.
    2. 0
      25 August 2016 19: 08
      The announcer carries some enchanting nonsense: "The bomb is launched outside the air defense." What deb * fishing is this designed for ?? The range of sane air defense systems, for example, Russian-made, many times exceeds 100 km, moreover, they are layered.

      What time and at what height?

      And how much is this wonderful miracle? The secret of the company, but you cook your money)
      "The main disadvantage of the" Spice "ammunition is its high cost relative to GPS-guided munitions."

      There is no secret. Hindus bought themselves.

      This very clever bomb looks like: a) The elusive Joe, who didn’t give up to anyone, and therefore the elusive (except Israel and Greece, no one ignited the desire to buy them); b) ripped off Israeli taxpayers and naive Papuans in order to get a gesheft on stunted 150 kg bombs for big shekels by cunning Jewish guys.

      When, as an argument, they start talking over the shekels of cunning Jewish guys, then there is nothing more to cover. request
  18. 0
    25 August 2016 14: 43
    Quote: KOSMOS59
    In general, as a rule, such serious inventions are not talked about at every corner, but are silent in a rag. If only this is not misleading the enemy.


    You've probably read that in Poland, some time ago, there was a bad cellular and GPS connection. This is the explanation and warning, especially zealous. The ball is on their side, about joint decisions against Russia. Let them "scratch their turnips."
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. 0
    25 August 2016 17: 38
    Quote: gg.na
    why is GPS also used not our Glonas ...

    Elementary Watson! The partner must know, but he knows for sure that the frequencies of control and management of his means of destruction (minimum detection) are under control and, if necessary, under control. Whether we use it or not - the issue of control and quenching (suppression, difficulty in exchanging data in the influence zone) is not addressed by us. Good luck? CREAT!
  21. +1
    25 August 2016 18: 58
    It’s better not to read Jewish comments. And God forbid to argue or debate. The appetite sharply improves and the depressed state of mind disappears.
  22. +1
    25 August 2016 18: 59
    Even it seems to me that the Professor provokes on purpose to pick up on the topic. For what? For whom? An interesting subject ...
    1. +2
      25 August 2016 19: 11
      Even it seems to me that the Professor provokes on purpose to pick up on the topic. For what? For whom? An interesting subject ...

      It’s clear what. I work for British, American and Israeli intelligence. soldier
      1. +2
        26 August 2016 10: 58
        Forgot to mention Japanese and German so that Comrade Vyshinsky came to mind ...
  23. 0
    26 August 2016 14: 33
    Quote: professor
    Are you going to suppress your own signal?
    The enemy does not sit still for a long time and does not rely on GPS and radio communications for a long time. For example

    Professor and besides children's cartoons there is nothing more? smile
  24. 0
    26 August 2016 14: 40
    Quote: Iglu40


    Even it seems to me that the Professor provokes on purpose to pick up on the topic. For what? For whom? An interesting subject ...

    Yes, what intelligence smile
    It's just that most of the local leaders from Israel work in the paid units of Internet warriors who legally exist in Israel and their task is to "bleach" and praise the Israeli regime and pour dirt on countries that disagree with it.
    In this case, Russian-speaking Israelis blame everything Russian.
    As the saying goes simply business people shekels earn laughing
  25. +1
    27 August 2016 08: 05
    The professor shows pictures all the time and praises his technique. Analogies involuntarily come to mind: 1. As in the bazaar she called out: "Respectable audience, hurry to buy." 2. Frightens with the invincible power of Israel, so that we should beware of attacking.