Military Review

"Admiral Makarov" went to sea for sea trials

78
The frigate "Admiral Makarov" (the third in a series of patrol ships of the 11356 project) on Friday went to sea for factory tests, reports TASS message of the press service of the Kaliningrad plant "Yantar".




“Today, Admiral Makarov, located in Baltiysk, set out on his first sea voyage to the Baltic Sea to complete the tasks of the factory test program,” the release said.

The plant explained that "the crew of the ship and the transfer team will test the general ship systems and devices, the main power plant, radio communications and navigation aids."

Tonight the frigate is reported to return to Baltiysk, “so that, together with the sailors, the main naval base of the Baltic fleet to celebrate the Day of the Russian Navy, which is celebrated this year on July 31. "

The press service reminded that “the patrol ship Admiral Makarov was laid at the Baltic Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad 29 February 2012, launched on 2 September 2015, the transfer to the fleet should be held in the third quarter of this year.”

The previous ships of this series, the Admiral Grigorovich and the Admiral Essen, this year have already been transferred to the military department and included in the Black Sea Fleet.



TASS Help: “The 11356 project ships are equipped with the Caliber-NK missile system, the Shtil-1 anti-aircraft missile system and the Palash missile and artillery complex, the 190 mm A-100 artillery, torpedo and anti-submarine weapons. In addition, each ship carries a helicopter. "
Photos used:
Drakon 64 / forums.airbase.ru
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Gladius
    Gladius 30 July 2016 12: 26
    +16
    As the saying goes, seven feet under the keel! Big ship, great sailing!
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 30 July 2016 12: 38
      +10
      Admiral series is growing. The southern group of the Navy is gradually building muscle.
      1. Ride78
        Ride78 30 July 2016 13: 13
        .
        But I still don’t understand how they manage to put tons of 9000 rocket mines into the 96 displacement, but here they couldn’t even put 24 under the caliber and onyx.
        Is it all the fault of "50 kg hard drives"?
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 July 2016 15: 55
          +10
          Quote: Ride78
          But I still don’t understand how they manage to put tons of 9000 rocket mines into the 96 displacement, but here they couldn’t even put 24 under the caliber and onyx.

          Why not understand it? The ship has 32 mine rockets, 8 caliber and 24 under missiles. Not the best, not the worst deal
        2. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 30 July 2016 19: 17
          0
          For especially dull ... In the army, first serve, they will explain ..
          Quote: Ride78
          But I still don’t understand how they manage to put tons of 9000 rocket mines into the 96 displacement, but here they couldn’t even put 24 under the caliber and onyx.
          Is it all the fault of "50 kg hard drives"?
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 31 July 2016 15: 10
            +1
            Quote: dmi.pris
            For especially dull ... In the army, first serve, they will explain ..

            First go to elementary school, they will teach you to read there. And if you nevertheless pretend to be this skill, you can come down and say what is wrong with my answer?
        3. Berkut24
          Berkut24 30 July 2016 22: 29
          +3
          Do you want the guard to be a missile cruiser?
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 July 2016 12: 38
      0
      Attention to all! Only today and only now! Be the first to write a comment with the phrase "Russia has only two allies: the army and the navy" and get 100500 pluses for free! laughing
      1. clidon
        clidon 31 July 2016 08: 23
        +1
        And "keep up the sailors!", "7 feet under the keel!" and other posts carrying a lot of interesting information - have you already sorted everything out? )
      2. Kunar
        Kunar 31 July 2016 11: 50
        0
        They have a holiday, a darago)))))) Che a wave of persecution, uh ...?
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 30 July 2016 15: 21
      +4
      Well, the 3rd admiral will be in service soon. This makes me happy. good
    4. Kunar
      Kunar 31 July 2016 11: 46
      +7
      Happy holiday, moreman ...... 7 feet under the keel))))) We are proud of you!
  2. Hunt
    Hunt 30 July 2016 12: 26
    +8
    Hooray, hooray, hooray !!! A good gift for the day of the Navy! A full-fledged ship of the second rank. Happy all!

    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 July 2016 12: 34
      .
      Urya-Urya-Urya! wassat
      Again the transfer of the ship was postponed! wassat
      Again we rejoice at the launch of the ship on the chassis, which was supposed to go into operation that year! wassat
      Again we are building what we were supposed to build in that millennium! wassat

      By the way, why is this article not a phrase we love so much "unparalleled in the world"? what
      1. ALABAY45
        ALABAY45 30 July 2016 12: 45
        +4
        Not by us, but by you! Judging by the flag - "unparalleled in the world" is this your homeland? Are you a "remote patriot" or in exile ?!
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 30 July 2016 12: 51
          -5
          Please forward all your complaints about my flag to my provider - Beeline-Kazakhstan. Am I a remote patriot? Maybe. It depends on what you mean by that.
          1. Hunt
            Hunt 30 July 2016 12: 55
            +15
            Yes, and therefore rejoice that for twenty-five years, almost nothing was built! And they will build a ship of the first rank, in general we will rejoice !!!
          2. ALABAY45
            ALABAY45 30 July 2016 13: 08
            +8
            A competently selected provider is the key to patriotism! wink
      2. Igor V
        Igor V 30 July 2016 12: 51
        +7
        Since someone is bad under the American flag, then we are doing everything right!
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 30 July 2016 12: 53
          -2
          Since someone is bad under the American flag, then we are doing everything right!

          Oh, one more! You, as I understand it, are also inclined primarily to look at the flag of the interlocutor, and not at the essence of what he wrote?
          1. ALABAY45
            ALABAY45 30 July 2016 13: 09
            +13
            Somehow the flag and the orientation of the statements are combined ... Coincidence ?! Hardly...
          2. Igor V
            Igor V 30 July 2016 13: 52
            +4
            Quote: Wiruz
            Since someone is bad under the American flag, then we are doing everything right!

            Oh, one more! You, as I understand it, are also inclined primarily to look at the flag of the interlocutor, and not at the essence of what he wrote?

            Well, the essence of your words is not any. In the past millennium, there were no such Gauges, for example.
            In addition, you teach me not to rejoice at the results of the work of my friends and acquaintances. PSZ Amber is not a simple sound for me, but for you, apparently, the alarm that drowns the mind.
          3. Alex von Dorn
            Alex von Dorn 1 August 2016 06: 52
            -1
            My friend, where do you look from? Sent Cossack?))
          4. Alex von Dorn
            Alex von Dorn 1 August 2016 06: 52
            -1
            My friend, where do you look from? Sent Cossack?))
        2. Maks-80
          Maks-80 30 July 2016 16: 22
          +2
          Fully agree with you!
      3. Gladius
        Gladius 30 July 2016 13: 15
        -4
        Quote: Wiruz
        Urya-Urya-Urya! wassat
        Again the transfer of the ship was postponed! wassat
        Again we rejoice at the launch of the ship on the chassis, which was supposed to go into operation that year! wassat
        Again we are building what we were supposed to build in that millennium! wassat

        By the way, why is this article not a phrase we love so much "unparalleled in the world"? what

        What pessimistic sentiment, Virus? You do not believe in Russian weapons that have no analogues in the world? You don’t need to write about it every time, it’s self-evident!
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 30 July 2016 13: 28
          -5
          What pessimistic sentiment, Virus?

          The mood is quite realistic. I just harbor a fierce "love" for the local "urya-patriots" who blindly rejoice at even the most insignificant achievements, but at the same time do not notice the serious problems and failures in the military-industrial complex.

          You do not believe in Russian weapons that have no analogues in the world?

          I believe that Bozhenka not only Russians gave intelligence.
          Specifically, in this case, it was just always funny for me when journalists, talking about the Shtil-1 air defense system, used the phrase "unparalleled in the world." laughing
          1. ALABAY45
            ALABAY45 30 July 2016 13: 37
            +3
            "I believe that God has endowed not only Russians with intelligence ..."
            Blessed is he who believes ... Do you seem to have low self-esteem ?! Take me, for example- I have no analogues in the world! yes I am unique ...
            1. midivan
              midivan 30 July 2016 13: 59
              +3
              Quote: ALABAY45
              "I believe that God has endowed not only Russians with intelligence ..."
              Blessed is he who believes ... Do you seem to have low self-esteem ?! Take me, for example- I have no analogues in the world! yes I am unique ...

              and modest bully forgot to finish
              1. ALABAY45
                ALABAY45 30 July 2016 14: 43
                +1
                I didn't say that ... Modesty is a sign of weakness, modest women are ignored, but I can't live without them! Well, I am weak "on the front", well, criticize me, criticize ... repeat
                1. midivan
                  midivan 30 July 2016 23: 15
                  +1
                  Quote: ALABAY45
                  I didn't say that ... Modesty is a sign of weakness, modest women are ignored, but I can't live without them! Well, I am weak "on the front", well, criticize me, criticize ... repeat

                  I'm weak on the front
                  and modesty not modesty has nothing to do with it, Ignore in my opinion those who are too strong on the front end lol
            2. Gladius
              Gladius 30 July 2016 14: 03
              -2
              Quote: ALABAY45
              "I believe that God has endowed not only Russians with intelligence ..."
              Blessed is he who believes ... Do you seem to have low self-esteem ?! Take me, for example- I have no analogues in the world! yes I am unique ...

              Well, all people are unique, Field Marshal smile .
              1. Abbra
                Abbra 30 July 2016 14: 32
                +2
                ... I am unique ...Judging by the level of modesty - I'm glad. So, there are no more of these, and is not expected. drinks
                1. sabakina
                  sabakina 30 July 2016 15: 08
                  +4
                  Quote: ALABAY45
                  I didn't say that ... Modesty is a sign of weakness, modest women are ignored, but I can't live without them! Well, I am weak "on the front", well, criticize me, criticize ... repeat

                  Sergei, there is no need to blame others for what they are not to blame. Better tell me, how is it better to tell, "how do you sow rutabagas there, with skin or without"? And then you got to poison us with your pickles when we are at work!
              2. Orionvit
                Orionvit 30 July 2016 18: 19
                0
                Well, all people are unique, Field Marshal
                Here I disagree with you. They are unique, they are those who know how to think critically, have their own opinion, and do not succumb to mass psychosis. As practice shows (for example, in the same Ukraine, where more than half of the population, for the sake of propaganda, radically changed their views in two years), there are very few strong-willed and interesting unique people. Unfortunately, more than 80% of people are led, and while not noticing anything, they all consider themselves absolutely "unique". And for the ship, the news is just great. Which fleet will they be assigned to?
                1. Tusv
                  Tusv 31 July 2016 04: 57
                  0
                  Quote: Orionvit
                  Unique, these are those who can think critically, have their own opinion, and are not amenable to mass psychosis.

                  That's for sure. I have a friend who criticizes everything. Five minutes of conversation and you are already sweating from criticism.
                  And we are ordinary people. With abstract thinking. We evaluate many points of view and choose what suits us
          2. Rom14
            Rom14 30 July 2016 16: 36
            +1
            Of course, there are plenty of problems, not only in the military-industrial complex, but throughout Russia, and the main thing is rampant theft (corruption). And while all the structures of the Russian government will serve a handful of "elite" (1 percent of the total population), there will be no serious and large-scale achievements. So we rejoice at what we have. And it takes, according to the calculations of specialists, at least 200 nuclear submarines, so that America will always calm down ...
          3. Tusv
            Tusv 31 July 2016 04: 45
            +1
            Quote: Wiruz
            when journalists, talking about the Shtil-1 air defense system, used the phrase "unparalleled in the world"

            I don’t know about Calm, I’ll tell you about the old P-12.
            The couple sees blurry. You put forward one block, all the lamps are on, the second, the third - you change the wotan from the zip. All in one hundred and thirty-fifth beam again irradiated by my radar. Are there any analogues in the world?
  3. svp67
    svp67 30 July 2016 12: 27
    +4
    well, that our fleet will be very happy with the return of another "admiral" to service.
  4. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 30 July 2016 12: 28
    +3
    And I congratulate the sailors in advance on the Day of the Navy! drinks as one great Russian man used to say, the Fleet in Russia should be !!! soldier
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 July 2016 12: 45
      -8
      "Sea vessels - to be", but not the essence winked
  5. Abbra
    Abbra 30 July 2016 12: 32
    +5
    Handsome man! Seven feet under the keel! Happy Navy Day !!!!
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 30 July 2016 13: 20
      -6
      Here I checked for the search for my comments one bat, which wanders around in and minus me in all positions. For what, one wonders, is this minus put? It would be better if I masturbated, there corns, I heard, on the whole palm, and not just on the index from clicking the mouse ... wassat
      1. ALABAY45
        ALABAY45 30 July 2016 14: 48
        +2
        Do not worry, we will attract to the fullest extent of the Law: "for helping the" kulak "and squandering the seed fund ..." am
  6. isker
    isker 30 July 2016 12: 52
    +4
    Any sea-based cruise missiles are the essence of a muzzle in the snout of striped democrats ...
    as they say, the greater the muzzle, the stronger the mushroom sleep ...
    1. Ride78
      Ride78 30 July 2016 13: 15
      -2
      Were there one destroyer with 64 mines, how many would he replace such short-haired? and the fuel goes away to move these scanty ones.
      1. Dam
        Dam 30 July 2016 20: 43
        +4
        One destroyer is one target, there are more of them and they are smaller. And where do you get such volley power?
  7. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 30 July 2016 13: 02
    +2
    Gd will give and this will be handed over under the Christmas tree and there will be 6 TFR at the Black Sea Fleet, and this is already something.
  8. demiurg
    demiurg 30 July 2016 13: 32
    +1
    Where is the Broadsword? I saw only the AK-630
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 July 2016 13: 35
      -3
      Do you still believe our journalists? There is no Broadsword there, as well as the second three of the Hindu "Talwar".
      1. ALABAY45
        ALABAY45 30 July 2016 14: 00
        +1
        "Yours" no! We have nothing at all ...
      2. _NortoN_
        _NortoN_ 30 July 2016 14: 32
        -2
        wipe out drooling, not so long ago about such replenishment for the fleet and there was no talk
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 30 July 2016 14: 38
          0
          wipe out drooling, not so long ago about such replenishment for the fleet and there was no talk

          It’s not for you to tell me what to wipe. And I'm glad to replenish the fleet no less than you.
      3. dvina71
        dvina71 30 July 2016 17: 11
        +4
        Quote: Wiruz
        No there Broadsword

        Well no. Because from the basic version (Uranus + PALASH) this modification is very different. THERE is already USKK, under several types of missiles and air defense Calm, which has 24 launchers, but short-range missiles, can be installed 4 in one shaft.
        Therefore, the AK-630, for peacetime, looks quite logical.
    2. dvina71
      dvina71 30 July 2016 17: 08
      +2
      Quote: demiurg
      Where is the Broadsword? I saw only the AK-630

      Actually, these are peacetime ships. But with open architecture. Broadsword, apparently, will no longer be at all. For the shell is numbed.
      It is easy to conclude that since the Shell-M is planned to be installed on the RTOs, then there is no difficulty in installing them on the TFR 11356. This can be done during the threatened period, or during repair / modernization.
  9. kirgiz58
    kirgiz58 30 July 2016 13: 44
    +10
    How I loved to accept the new technique! Sometimes you open the hatch of a mechanic, sit on a seat, take a look at the instruments, and they already burn from fresh phosphorus. You press MZN and start up with air and immediately behind your back 620 obedient horses respond. You’ll stick the second one with a roar and send 42 tons subject to you !!! In white I envy the sailors who will rise to the deck of new ships to serve Russia and rejoice with them. upcoming holiday MAREMANA!
  10. atamankko
    atamankko 30 July 2016 13: 47
    +3
    Forward and with the song ADMIRALS, in fear of enemies and provocateurs.
  11. severyanin
    severyanin 30 July 2016 13: 51
    +1
    Good news! Here is just something I did not notice the "Broadsword" - the turrets of the AK-630 installations on the sides of the helipad I see, but the "Broadsword" is not what
  12. Signaller
    Signaller 30 July 2016 14: 32
    0
    Seven feet under the keel to him. To the joy of us, the death of adversaries. Go Russia.
  13. Neputin
    Neputin 30 July 2016 14: 36
    +1
    And yet I would like to return to the absolutely fair, in my opinion, Ride78 issue. The Americans are pushing 9000 launchers into a displacement of 96 tons. Our "admirals" are 4000 tons each. And only 8 PU. And this is without a clear air defense. In theory, there should be at least 24 shafts for the caliber and 24 for the calm. Why is that? After all, the sizes of Caliber and Tomohawk are generally comparable (see below).
    The length of the housing without a starting accelerator (Tomahawk / Caliber) is 5,56 / 7,2 m. The length with a starting amplifier is 6,25 / 8,1 m.
    Wingspan - 2,67 / 3,3 m.
    The mass of a non-nuclear warhead is 450 kg (US / RF).
    The power of the nuclear variant is 150 / 100-200 кТ.

    PS Just now I thought that this might not be possible for constructive reasons. Navy explain.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 July 2016 14: 49
      -1
      I ask myself this question myself. We still have to wait and wait for the destroyer "Leader", and the oceanic fleet, as such, is practically absent.

      Okay, there is a problem with the engines, it seems to be being solved. Now the idea of ​​building semi-destroyer ships, so to speak, in an enlarged hull of the same project 22350, was quite logical. Moreover, the emphasis should be placed on strike weapons. As I understand it, Project 22350 will no longer be built - the project will be limited to four ships (although six have been ordered), then Project 22350M or Project 22352, shrouded in mystery, will go further. I would like to see them with 32 UKSK cells for well-known missiles and the same number of cells of the Redut air defense system. Ideally, it would be an excellent "workhorse" for action in distant sea and ocean areas. The main thing is that "Redoubt" fired regularly, because somehow I would not want to put "Calm-1" with its range of 50-70 km.
      1. Neputin
        Neputin 30 July 2016 15: 32
        0
        I absolutely agree that Redoubt would be better. I wrote about Calm because in fact there is not even a Broadsword on this episode. Some metal cutters AK 630. But is this air defense? This is to laugh at the chickens. Yeah, now, NATO will only pull up his pants and will scatter from this frigate or boat. But VO is, as always, full of optimism.
        "Everything will be awesome and nothing to grieve about
        We need to sing a hundred and forty times daily
        That everything is excellent, everything is just awesome, everything is good. "T. Shaov
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 30 July 2016 15: 46
        +1
        Quote: Wiruz
        then go shrouded in mystery pr.22350M or pr.22352

        Most likely they will be about the same displacement and amount of weapons, just update the electronics. If they do the ocean frigate project, it will be something with a displacement of 6-7 thousand tons, such as the Baden-Württemberg, and this is a completely different project. That is, 22350 can be taken as a basis, but the difference will be very large.
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 30 July 2016 16: 01
          -2
          If they do the project of the ocean frigate, it will be something with a displacement of 6-7 thousand tons

          This is exactly what I would like to see the new frigate, because the twelve atomic destroyers for action in the ocean zone is very small. Moreover, according to recent reports, there will be not twelve, but eight. crying
          http://izvestia.ru/news/623192
    2. ALABAY45
      ALABAY45 30 July 2016 14: 55
      +2
      I, too, am not naval ... And does a modern torpedo (rocket) take into account the number of mines on board ?! Or, the more mines, the more timid torpedo ?! repeat They say they are also nuclear ... Or, so, naval tales?
    3. rudolff
      rudolff 30 July 2016 15: 22
      +1
      The naval ones will not explain. Why on the "admiral's series" 8 launchers of the Caliber nomenclature, as well as on RTOs with a displacement of 800 tons, no one knows. It suited the Hindus, master-master, but ours simply did not change anything. Although the design changes would be minimal.
    4. Dart2027
      Dart2027 30 July 2016 15: 38
      +4
      It’s just all the cells for missiles and air defense and percussion.
      So to 8 Caliber you need to add the Shtil-1 air defense system with 36 more missiles, which, although smaller, also require space.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 30 July 2016 15: 57
        -1
        So to 8 Caliber you need to add the Shtil-1 air defense system with 36 more missiles, which, although smaller, also require space.

        A small amendment, there are 24, not 36.

        In general, according to the idea, we are smoothly moving on to another problem of the Russian Navy - the lack of a single launcher capable of launching not only cruise, but also anti-aircraft missiles.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 July 2016 16: 07
          +3
          Quote: Wiruz
          In general, according to the idea, we are smoothly moving on to another problem of the Russian Navy - the lack of a single launcher capable of launching not only cruise, but also anti-aircraft missiles.

          This is just not a problem, because a universal PU is not needed at all from the word "absolutely".
        2. Dart2027
          Dart2027 30 July 2016 16: 23
          0
          Quote: Wiruz
          A small amendment, there are 24, not 36.
          Yes confused ..
          Quote: Wiruz
          the lack of a single launcher capable of launching not only cruise, but also anti-aircraft missiles
          There are arguments for and against. On the one hand, universality is usually good, on the other hand, not everything can be driven into one size.
          Quote: Wiruz
          I would like to see a new frigate, for twelve atomic destroyers for action in the ocean zone are very few
          Let's see what happens. Most likely, the OFs will start all the same with the Leaders, simply because there are no problems with nuclear power plants, but then, when they are saturated with ships, the DMZ can return to the ocean frigates.
        3. dvina71
          dvina71 30 July 2016 17: 17
          +1
          Quote: Wiruz
          In general, according to the idea, we are smoothly moving on to another problem of the Russian Navy

          This is not a problem. This is a systematic approach, do not lay eggs in an ode to the basket.
          In my opinion, single mines for anti-aircraft defense and for anti-ship missiles, missile defense is a real problem .., you can remain without shock launchers (due to a breakdown for example), but stay only with barrel artillery .. this is really a problem ..
    5. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 July 2016 16: 04
      +2
      Quote: Neputin
      And yet I would like to return to the absolutely fair, in my opinion, Ride78 issue. The Americans are pushing 9000 launchers into a displacement of 96 tons. Our "admirals" are 4000 tons each. And only 8 PU. And this is without a clear air defense. In theory, there should be at least 24 shafts for the caliber and 24 for the calm.

      Not 8 PU, but 32 PU - 24 for Calm and 8 gauge. Moreover, it is completely unclear why 24 Calm, originally promised 36. Perhaps saved, maybe some other reason
      But in any case, the ship carries 32 PU. This is an average indicator - Alvaro de Bazan have 48 PUs (but they are slightly larger in size, the same Fridtjof Nansen has only 16 PUs, although they are larger in size than Bazan
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 30 July 2016 16: 29
        0
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Fridtjof Nansen has a total of 16 PU

        Are you sure? In my opinion 8 UVP Mk41 is not less than 32 mines
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 31 July 2016 20: 46
          +2
          Quote: Dart2027
          Are you sure? In my opinion 8 UVP Mk41 is not less than 32 mines

          Namely 8 mines. 4 ЕССМ (they are small) are placed in one mine; from here ammunition in 32 zur
      2. Neputin
        Neputin 30 July 2016 20: 12
        0
        So the fact of the matter is that there seems to be no "calm" there. Or is it worth it? The information is different in different sources. If it is really worth it, then I take 50% of the claims back (because UKSK could have been done more).
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 30 July 2016 20: 58
          +5
          Quote: Neputin
          Or is it worth it?

          SKR Admiral Grigorovich. We look carefully 2.07 .. this is it. Calm.
  14. Afgan-67
    Afgan-67 30 July 2016 15: 02
    0
    Ukrainians from mobilization flee under the wing of an older brother, in RUSSIA ... - but where will the Yankees run ??? to the pops? lol
  15. SMAKAROV49
    SMAKAROV49 30 July 2016 15: 52
    +3
    Seven feet under the keel of the same name)
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 30 July 2016 17: 33
      +2
      Stepan Osipovich Makarov: "Saving the world, REMEMBER THE WAR!" (Inscription above the central arch of the Main Admiralty). Congratulations to our national holiday, "namesake" of the great Admiral!
      1. SMAKAROV49
        SMAKAROV49 30 July 2016 20: 05
        +2
        Thank! And you with a holiday! On August 2, we are also planning a celebration).
  16. cedar
    cedar 30 July 2016 18: 28
    0
    Beautiful boat. Always admire the creatures of our shipbuilders, both underwater and surface ships. There is in our ships aesthetics peculiar only to them, grace of lines. "Leader" would be seen in real life.
    1. Neputin
      Neputin 30 July 2016 20: 07
      0
      You, excuse me, write the word "creation" from what root. If from the word "creativity", then it is understandable. But if from the other - now our patriots piss you on "the most I can not". Although in something you are right. Such is our fleet - "each creature has a pair."
  17. masiya
    masiya 30 July 2016 19: 14
    +1
    Great news on the eve of the day of the Navy of all the sailors on the upcoming holiday !!!
  18. Valevampo
    Valevampo 30 July 2016 20: 32
    +1
    He himself looked and showed his relatives, they all said one thing - Handsome! Looks great
  19. okroshka79
    okroshka79 30 July 2016 21: 28
    +1
    To all who have dedicated their life or given a part of it to serving the Motherland in the Russian Navy, as well as those who are not indifferent to our fleet, who design and build our wonderful ships, I congratulate you on the holiday! I wish you all the blessings of life, seven feet under the keel and a fair wind on the course of life.
  20. Taygerus
    Taygerus 31 July 2016 08: 50
    0
    beautiful ship, seven feet under the keel! good
  21. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn 1 August 2016 06: 53
    0
    We can because ... And this is just the beginning, the adversaries will be "happy". Seven feet under the keel!