Military Review

"Admiralty Shipyards" completed the repair of diesel-electric submarines "Krasnodar"

18
The Krasnodar diesel-electric submarines, which had been under repair at the Admiralty Shipyards after the “navigation incident” in the Baltic Sea since May 4, left the factory in the evening on July 9, “according to the ship’s schedule and ship arrangements”, reports Flotprom.


Submarines of the project 636.3 "Krasnodar" and "Veliky Novgorod" on the "Admiralty Shipyards"

“The entry of the Krasnodar submarine, already transferred to the Russian Navy, to the manufacturer took place after reports appeared in the media about the collision of the ship with the Polish Ozhel submarine. Subsequently, the publication of the incident was refuted, however, "a high-ranking representative of the Russian Navy" said the RIA "News“that April 20 had a navigational incident in the Baltic Sea,” the portal explains.

In May, repair work began in the “fencing of sliding devices of a submarine” area.

It is noted that the next day (July 10) after the release of "Krasnodar", the new diesel-electric submarines "Veliky Novgorod" returned to the factory from sea trials.

Both submarines belong to the 636.3 Varshavyanka project.

The resource reminds that the diesel-electric submarines of this project are armed with “6 nose torpedo tubes of caliber 533 mm with automatic loading, 18 torpedoes, 24 mines, 4 Caliber missiles,“ Strela-3 ”or“ Eagle ”(8 missiles) missiles”.
Photos used:
Central Naval Portal, Andrey Sergeev
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 17 July 2016 13: 10
    +2
    So I did not understand - there was a collision with a flat submarine or yes ??? am
    1. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 17 July 2016 13: 13
      +9
      What difference was not there! Indirectly, you can look at the Pshek sites to repair their boats!
      And Krasnodar is seven feet under the keel and long years of service for the good of the motherland!
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 17 July 2016 13: 34
        +14
        Nobody came across anyone !! It’s just that both, quite by accident, broke down at one point in the sea - after all, this is constantly happening. wink
        1. cniza
          cniza 17 July 2016 18: 38
          +4
          It is said - a navigational accident ... the main thing is that it quickly returned to duty.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 17 July 2016 13: 16
      -1
      Also, I have not heard anything about the "flat" submarine. laughing
      But if something is bent, then something is faced. A little tweaked and in order.
    4. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 17 July 2016 14: 15
      +2
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      So I did not understand - there was a collision with a flat submarine or yes ???
      The Russian Navy has denied a clash of Polish and Russian submarines. Poland followed suit.
      REN TV reported on the collision of the Russian submarine with the Polish Ozhel, citing its own sources. It was reported that the incident occurred in the Baltic Sea off the coast of the Pilausky Peninsula, as a result, the Polish submarine had to be towed from the scene of the collision, and the Russian submarine did not receive significant damage.
      Later, the television channel reported that the collision of the submarines “turned out to be nothing more than an“ educational maneuver ”: the Russian submarine made the Polish float to the surface.” Both publications were later deleted.
      Then information about the collision of the submarines was denied by the press secretary of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Poland, Lt. Col. Marek Petzak, reports RBC.
      “There was no and could not be a collision, since in the last few days our submarine was exclusively in the Gdansk Bay and did not go into the open sea,” he said.
      The submarine Krasnodar of the Baltic Fleet did not collide with the Polish submarine in the Baltic Sea. This was stated by a senior representative of the Russian Navy.
      “There was no collision,” the source said. He added that on April 20 there was a navigational accident, after which the boat returned safely to Baltiysk, RIA Novosti reported.
    5. alekc73
      alekc73 17 July 2016 15: 00
      +1
      The command of the Baltic Fleet was dispersed with a scandal. Think for the lack of sheets at the sailors.
    6. Sergey39
      Sergey39 17 July 2016 20: 12
      +1
      It was ours gone under its own power, and pulled a tugboat in Pshekovo.
  2. starogil
    starogil 17 July 2016 13: 19
    +5
    "... the media reported about the collision of the ship with the Polish submarine" Ozhel "..."
    Presumably the Polish Eagle - unsuitable for repair ....
  3. semuil
    semuil 17 July 2016 13: 57
    0
    That's all, we are waiting for the next wave of reports of the interception and escort of a Russian submarine.
  4. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 17 July 2016 14: 16
    +2
    Quote: semuil
    That's all, we are waiting for the next wave of reports of the interception and escort of a Russian submarine.

    About professional interception, note.

    The source reports that the Russian submarine as a result of the collision did not receive serious damage and independently reached the naval base in a surface position. The Polish submarine suffered significant damage, and after surfacing it was necessary to use a tugboat, to deliver a submarine to the Polish coast.
    REN-TV
  5. Neputin
    Neputin 17 July 2016 15: 27
    +2
    But I’m wondering if the TA on the submarine are unified for torpedoes, mines and "Caliber" and is automatically charged, then why such a layout of 4-caliber ammunition, 18 torpedoes, 24 mines. If this is not a "terrible military secret", explain whether other combinations of shock weapons are possible on the 636 project? Somebody knows?
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 17 July 2016 16: 16
      +1
      Quote: Neputin
      ... If this is not a "terrible military secret", explain whether other combinations of strike weapons are possible on the 636 project? Somebody knows?

      The shock complex for each boat is formed to fulfill certain tasks.
      1. Neputin
        Neputin 17 July 2016 17: 10
        0
        Those. You want to say that the option of a submarine 636 project with 18 calibers is possible, for example? Then it can really become a serious hemorrhoids for our potential friends.
    2. Talgat
      Talgat 17 July 2016 19: 48
      +1
      If I’m not mistaken - I read that there are 6 torpedo tubes - on 18 torpedoes (that is, this is the maximum - without mines and without calibres) - by 3 to the device

      but if necessary, part of the torpedoes are replaced by mines - or calibers. If you take only mines - then 24

      for the task, you can choose the optimal number of torpedoes -min and calibers
  6. Titsen
    Titsen 17 July 2016 21: 00
    +1
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    “There was no collision,” the source said. He added that on April 20 there was a navigational accident, after which the boat returned safely to Baltiysk, RIA Novosti reported.


    What is the difference between a "navigation incident" and a "collision" from the point of view of sailors?
    I am a pure hunter ....
    1. morprepud
      morprepud 17 July 2016 21: 58
      0
      A navigational accident consisting in an unforeseen stoppage of the vessel due to touching the ground or underwater obstacle with the bottom or part thereof at a depth less than or equal to the draft. [GOST R 22.0.09 95] Security topics in ...
      ...
      PS ... earlier, on ships, compasses were flooded with alcohol (!) ... and therefore, incidents occurred more often !!! drinks
      But, it was with us, and you divers don't need a compass, "And therefore 7 feet under the keel, and:
      Let there be storm and bad weather.
      Let the waves furiously throw the ships.
      You are not afraid of fierce weather, only you are at the bottom of the sea!
  7. proud
    proud 17 July 2016 22: 18
    0
    I'm afraid to ask: And this is not the same boat on which the former commander of the "Zaporizhzh" was put in command? He, after all, commanded his submarine only welded to the pier, without the right to full immersion. If yes, then I think this is not the last incident with his participation, whatever one may say, but experience comes over the years! Seven feet under the keel for you Krasnodar! And fewer accidents at sea!