Belarusians will bring improved T-72 to tank biathlon

47
The Chinese and Belarusian military will perform in Russia on tank biathlon on their vehicles, reports Messenger of Mordovia.

Belarusians will bring improved T-72 to tank biathlon


As previously reported, the Chinese are likely to perform in their modernized tanks Type-96. “These combat vehicles have a number of improvements, such as modified tracks and track rollers, as well as a new cleaning and air conditioning system. However, the most serious change in comparison with the tanks that we had earlier was the presence of a significantly improved engine. According to some estimates, its power can be 1300 hp, which is significantly more than the Russian T-72B3 in the 2016 version, ”writes the author of the article, Lev Romanov.

The Belarusian team will become another strong participant in biathlon.

“Last Monday,“ VoenTV Belarus ”posted on youtube.com a report“ Preparing for a tank biathlon - 2016 ”. On the video, among the usual T-72B with mounted dynamic protection (DZ), there are tanks that strongly resemble Russian T-72B3 of the first releases. They also installed a modern multi-channel sight "Sosna-U", which was developed and produced in Belarus. There is also a wind sensor, ”the publication says.



The author notes that the Belarusian tank, as well as the first Russian T-72B3, “on the right side of the tower, at the place where the infrared projector was located, is currently showing a“ bald patch ”- there is no dynamic protection there.” However, "and in the opposite side of the gun, the DM blocks for the convenience of the driver are also removed."

The main difference from the Russian T-72 modernized is the use of the tracked ribbons of the old design on the “allied” tank.

“Since Belarus does not have the ability to independently produce or modify engines, then surely the power of the power plant is the same as the Russian tank, so there will be no mobility advantage,” writes Romanov.



And, nevertheless, the opportunity to speak on his technique saves Belarusians from retraining in Alabino to a new modification of the tank for them. “Each tank has its own“ character ”and guests from the neighboring republic have probably thoroughly studied the features of their vehicles,” which will allow them to more confidently fight for the main prize of the competition, he concludes.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    13 July 2016 10: 45
    Belarusians will bring improved T-72 to tank biathlon
    the Chinese are likely to perform on their upgraded Type-96 tanks.
    fit, there is intrigue. we will see.
    1. +5
      13 July 2016 10: 57
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      fit, there is intrigue. we will see.

      “Since Belarus does not have the ability to independently produce or modify engines, then the power of the power plant is probably the same as the Russian tank, so there will be no advantages in mobility”

      Most likely, Belarusians will not bother on the chassis. Their strong point is electronic filling, sights, optics ...
      The Chinese, however, "conjured" with the engine, want to surprise with something. Information was slipping about new armor-piercing shells, with a depleted uranium core. Perhaps something worthwhile happened.
      Biathlon will show soldier
      1. +12
        13 July 2016 11: 27
        What nafig depleted uranium in competitions? No one in their right mind will allow the use of toxic heavy metals on their territory. Uranium is possible only by testing its samples at the proving grounds, but practical shooting only with tungsten.
        1. +3
          13 July 2016 12: 00
          The Chinese and Belarusian military will perform in Russia at the tank biathlon using their own equipment, the Bulletin of Mordovia reports.


          The right decision, but what about the rest? This is a good thing tank biathlon.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +5
          13 July 2016 12: 11
          Quote: vadimtt
          What nafig depleted uranium in competitions? No one in their right mind will allow the use of toxic heavy metals on their territory. Uranium is possible only by testing its samples at the proving grounds, but practical shooting only with tungsten.

          I’ll tell you a little secret:
          Today, all armor-piercing-submunition shells both in us and in NATO have depleted uranium cores, just this is the most effective option for armor penetration. Every tanker who graduated from a tank school knows this. Yes
          These shells do not explode, it’s just an iron bar with a uranium core inside, which penetrates the tank’s armor due to its increased mass and high initial speed.
          You confuse a sledgehammer with a nuclear bomb, and even frighten colleagues laughing
          1. +4
            13 July 2016 13: 46
            What does the nuclear weapons have to do with it? We are talking about the CHEMICAL properties of uranium, as one of the most aggressive representatives of heavy metals. Plus its pyrophoricity with the formation of volatile compounds in the defeat of targets.
            And besides, for some reason I do not observe a massive blockage of warehouses even with the already outdated BOPS-ohm "Lead" bully
            1. +5
              13 July 2016 14: 11
              What does the nuclear weapons have to do with it?

              And someone talked about nuclear weapons request
              Plus its pyrophoricity with the formation of volatile compounds in the defeat of targets.

              This is generally a classic good
              You minus what our engineers did their best to achieve in the tungsten cores of tank shells.
              They added additives to the tungsten alloy to increase the pyrophoricity of the cores request
              We are talking about the CHEMICAL properties of uranium, as one of the most aggressive representatives of heavy metals.

              Depleted uranium is naturally toxic. Lead is toxic, plastic, even pure oxygen is poison. But it is less toxic than many heavy metals and is very weakly radioactive, due to the long half-life.
              Moreover, the Americans do not care a single gram of comfort ... and the health of their tankers is on their side ... they use this very uranium, on the Abrams, to make inserts in the armor of the front of the hull and the front of the turret request
              1. -1
                13 July 2016 14: 26
                I have no desire to argue. Just leave it here - http://www.srpska.ru/article.php?nid=14938
                It can be differently related to these materials, but there is no smoke without fire.
                1. +5
                  13 July 2016 15: 01
                  Quote: vadimtt
                  I have no desire to argue. Just leave it here - http://www.srpska.ru/article.php?nid=14938

                  You already argued. And the conversation, with the transfer of arrows to Serbian sources is certainly interesting, but incorrecthi
                  It can be differently related to these materials, but there is no smoke without fire.

                  I agree with this statement hi
          2. -1
            13 July 2016 20: 33
            Quote: Andrey K
            Quote: vadimtt
            What nafig depleted uranium in competitions? No one in their right mind will allow the use of toxic heavy metals on their territory. Uranium is possible only by testing its samples at the proving grounds, but practical shooting only with tungsten.

            I’ll tell you a little secret:
            Today, all armor-piercing-submunition shells both in us and in NATO have depleted uranium cores, just this is the most effective option for armor penetration. Every tanker who graduated from a tank school knows this. Yes
            These shells do not explode, it’s just an iron bar with a uranium core inside, which penetrates the tank’s armor due to its increased mass and high initial speed.
            You confuse a sledgehammer with a nuclear bomb, and even frighten colleagues laughing


            I will tell you a secret:
            Colleague vadimtt was 100% right - read about the consequences of the use of such shells by Americans in Iraq.
            1. +5
              13 July 2016 20: 50
              Quote: Alex777

              I will tell you a secret:
              Colleague vadimtt was 100% right - read about the consequences of the use of such shells by Americans in Iraq.

              I would love to discuss with you about the consequences of the use of shells by the Americans in Iraq. But we are talking in the context of the topic of the article about tank biathlon. I, with a colleague of vadimtt, just so as not to seem rude, supported this conversation he was peddlinghi
              Colleague Alex777, ammunition of this type in full, everywhere and by all. Us including. Let us discuss with you the destructive effects of lead bullet filler at the battlefield. I assure you, the poison from these millions of tons of lead and other elements of the periodic table is much more destructive than the already used ammunition with a uranium core.
              I am not interested in the topic of conversation you are imposing hi
        4. +1
          13 July 2016 13: 49
          All previous games used BOPS: why did they invent a bicycle, why did they shoot and will always use the depletion ... The body material of the active part is “material B” (alloy based on uranium-32)

          If, of course, they take 3BM44, then there is no uranium and the residence permit alloy is coming, but I think that they will give them a lift and will plow ...
      2. +3
        13 July 2016 12: 11
        Aha! On targets by lunch uranium wassat
        1. +5
          13 July 2016 12: 21
          Quote: jetfors_84
          Aha! On targets by lunch uranium wassat

          Did the word "uranium" scare you?
          It’s just a heavy metal, which exceeds lead in gravity and is not inferior in strength to iron, has a radioactivity that is very slightly higher than the natural radiation background hi
          Note: Tungsten carbide core shells are no longer available hi
        2. +5
          13 July 2016 13: 56
          Quote: jetfors_84
          Aha! On targets by lunch uranium wassat

          A colleague who would have ended up arguing about tank shells and cores with depleted uranium (although I did not say a word and did not even suggest that they could be used in biathlon), I rummaged on the Internet.
          I found a note that as part of the Paint project, a new projectile is being developed to simulate a tank duel battle. It can be used in the entire cycle of exercises, including shooting at targets and practical targets of a conditional opponent. The affected object is not destroyed, but only marked. An important feature of the ammunition is the possibility of its use in the presence of a large crowd of people.
          "The development is expected to make Tank Biathlon even more spectacular."

          The Chinese "Type 96" has a 125 mm ZPT-98 (unlicensed copy of the 2A46M), that is, the same gun as ours. Accordingly, no problems with shells are expected.hi
      3. 0
        13 July 2016 12: 25
        There are practical shells for everyone, where will the BOPS combat come from?
        1. +5
          13 July 2016 12: 33
          There are practical shells for everyone, where will the BOPS combat come from?

          Colleague, I dare to recall what I wrote above by commenting:
          The Chinese, however, "conjured" with the engine, want to surprise with something. Information was slipping about new armor-piercing shells, with a depleted uranium core. Perhaps something worthwhile happened.

          I started a conversation about the Chinese, who prepared for the competition by cranking the engine, and mentioned a shell for the same tank. I did not write that it will be used in biathlon.
          My opponent, apparently decided to show off erudition and already linked this information with biathlon request
          At the same time, they are trying to convince me that the depleted uranium core and the "nuclear bonba" are one and the same laughing
    2. 0
      13 July 2016 11: 06
      I wonder what kind of engine the Chinese have for 1300 horses? Did such a gas or a turbine engine be bungled?
      1. +3
        13 July 2016 12: 07
        Quote: DMB_95
        I wonder what kind of engine the Chinese have for 1300 horses? Did such a gas or a turbine engine be bungled?


        narrow-eyed can’t do anything from scratch, of course, the completion of our B46 diesel engine, we increased the engine capacity, put a double turbocharger, something like this, everything is to the detriment of the engine’s life, but it’s enough for ten thousand run ...
        1. 0
          13 July 2016 12: 37
          The Chinese overestimate the parameters, like two fingers .... We made a reference engine, polished the air, balanced the crank with the piston, valves to the ideal, the piston and piston gaps to the minimum possible, launched them on the stand, took off the characteristics, all honestly. Only now, the engine for the rally, and the engine for the production car, these are two big differences, despite the similar parameters. So this is even without speeding to the detriment of motor resources request
      2. VP
        +1
        13 July 2016 12: 35
        It is written that improved.
        Means the same that was but forced.
        So we are waiting for breakdowns)
        1. +1
          13 July 2016 14: 18
          Quote: VP
          Means the same that was but forced.

          Well, that doesn't mean that. Forcing is to take power to the detriment of the resource, and to improve it is a purely harsher manufacturing technology, balancing and features, such as improving the purge and the quality and distribution of the fuel mixture with air in the combustion chamber. There it can even grow motor resources, but each engine can be brought up like this, I don’t even know what is more expensive, to build a robot line with control at every step, or manually, with diagnostics, stick an individually prepared engine on each tank. But, for the competition, just so that there will be no breakdowns, do not expect the Chinese to have the first or second laughing
    3. 0
      14 July 2016 10: 46
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      fit, there is intrigue. we will see.



      Intrigue yes. Only the Chinese every year will improve their tank. And we ?
  2. +7
    13 July 2016 10: 46
    I look forward to this action. Mentally distributed the seats. The first is Russia, the second is Belarus, the third is China ... winked
    1. +6
      13 July 2016 11: 08
      Quote: Abbra
      I look forward to this action. Mentally distributed the seats. The first is Russia, the second is Belarus, the third is China ... winked

      Your words, yes to God’s ears Yes
      But still: both teams - the Chinese and the Belarusian, are very serious rivals. These are not the prancing "princes of the desert" from Kuwait hi
  3. +3
    13 July 2016 10: 56
    the strongest will win...)
    well, and who will bring what to see hi
  4. 0
    13 July 2016 10: 59
    It will be very interesting.
  5. +1
    13 July 2016 11: 00
    may the strongest win, I will root for ours, for Russia
  6. 0
    13 July 2016 11: 04
    The Chinese with their own need to be evaluated separately, to launch from the T90 ... I don’t understand why there are no Chinese crews on the T72 as part of the biathlon? So not completely honest!
    1. +1
      13 July 2016 11: 14
      No, biathlon is still a competition of technology and people, not just people. This is the same as saying all the Formula 1 pilots put in the standard and the same technique.

      Initially, they invited LeKlerkov, Leo, and even Abrash by the way. When there were no sanctions yet.
      1. +1
        13 July 2016 12: 22
        Quote: donavi49
        Initially, they invited LeKlerkov, Leo, and even Abrash by the way. When there were no sanctions yet.

        At the Strong Europe Tank Challenge - Leo took prizes, furnishing everyone, so you can invite one team to Leo, for the purity of the experiment. wink
        1. +1
          13 July 2016 12: 50
          Quote: lelikas
          You can invite one team to Leo, for the purity of the experiment.

          For cleanliness, just the maximum sample is needed, well, the larger, the cleaner, the average calculated, in mathematical statistics, exceptions to the rules and, as a result, incorrect conclusions about how they work anywhere request
    2. 0
      13 July 2016 16: 00
      Quote: Dyatko Nebatko
      The Chinese with their own need to be evaluated separately, to launch from the T90 ... I don’t understand why there are no Chinese crews on the T72 as part of the biathlon? So not completely honest!

      Well, ours perform with the engines of 1130 horses, which is also not fair. In relation to the rest.
      1. 0
        13 July 2016 18: 26
        honestly, God forbid, it’s so subjective and relative, to draw conclusions and take measures, well and essno, as usual, sort things out, punish the innocent and reward the uninvolved, don't get used to it, Cho. WHO DOES NOT DO ANYTHING THAT IS NOT MISTAKED soldier drinks
  7. +1
    13 July 2016 11: 04
    To release a team on tanks at the 2018 World Cup. X. will be removed, with a lawn, then restored, but "RF-champion".
  8. 0
    13 July 2016 11: 07
    Tank biathlon - even without Guberniev's enthusiastic cries - is a fascinating sight. I watched without stopping, and even downloaded the file myself. It was interesting to see how the Chinese constantly "substituted" tanks. Will they also be in battle?
    Yes, and the cliff of the track on the track ... I look forward to it.
  9. +3
    13 July 2016 11: 08
    I am for a friendly match, I will follow both teams with great interest.
    Well-aimed shots !!!
  10. +1
    13 July 2016 11: 40
    May Friendship win!
  11. 0
    13 July 2016 12: 23
    What number will start?
  12. +1
    13 July 2016 12: 23
    Well done. It’s good when different teams have different techniques. not only crews compete, but also designers. so I wonder - and our Armata will not roll out?
  13. +3
    13 July 2016 13: 31
    Could boast at the parade in Minsk a new tank
  14. +1
    13 July 2016 13: 58
    Kazakhstan also needs to bring its own, with the SLA from Elbit and in competitions to compare with the SLA PINE.
  15. +1
    13 July 2016 16: 04
    If Belarusians beat us, then we will certainly be indignant, but for too long.
    If the Chinese bypass us, then it will not do without sparks.

    Z.Y. when I served in the USSR as an urgent in tank in Belarus, first training in Pecs near Borisov, then in the 1 th brigade of the 5 KLA in Minsk [Uruchye], we sometimes called Belarus itself a potato republic, and sometimes a tank one. Sooo many of them were there.
  16. 0
    14 July 2016 16: 42
    I wish someone else brought their own. Hindus for example. Arjun or T-90!
  17. 0
    16 July 2016 23: 14
    In one article they write 1300 hp, in another 1200 hp, in the end it turns out that this is all fiction and wishful thinking. When I bring it, then it will be known! request
  18. 0
    16 July 2016 23: 36
    The upgraded version of the T-72B3 for tank biathlon. It differs from the basic version by the presence of a panoramic thermal imaging device of the commander, an engine with a power of 1130hp, a gear shift automaton and a motion control system with a speech informant of critical operating modes of nodes.