Does the North Caucasus need money?

41
Does the North Caucasus need money?


It is not without reason that Andrei Makarevich has the lines in the text of the song "Marionettes": "... dolls are tugging at the strings, they have smiles on their faces ...".

To begin with, no matter how we treat the President of the Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov, no matter how much we scold him, no matter what loyalty to Moscow they give him, we must give him his due. Question: Why? And here comes the moment of truth - the struggle! Yes, yes, just the struggle that continues to this day. It became, however, sluggish, but it did not end, it continues.

We, Russians, know little that the North Caucasus is again flooded with “forest brothers”, Wahhabism is progressing again, they are killing and robbing, they are reclaiming business and imposing the same caliphate.

Ha, gentlemen, we are Russians, but let us, again, Russians, we need this, like, let them deal with their own problems, we have enough of our own, and it is expensive and financially and morally to charge you with your chest.

Stop, stop. But not so long ago, in the 1995 year, and the grief we grabbed, I say, to the fullest. The cries in the press: "to separate the Caucasus, to heal in a human way, for the Russians - a Russian ..."



Let's think about it! And whose are such cries, something similar to the division, even more, of Russia. Tomorrow they will shout: "... drive Tatarstan, Siberia (mine), the Far East," and here it is, everything is ready, Russia is dead!

And the question is very interesting ..., then they will ask to divide Siberia once again into two or three, another two or three Far East, but we will not be asked about this, and why? Well, from three times, I think you guessed it!

Again, the North Caucasus is sponsored by Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, i.e. in the separation of the whole of the Caucasus, near Krasnodar, practically all the states and other sattelites appear with terrible, just disgusting scum. I have the right to believe that "hooray," we do not scream!

So do we need money for the North Caucasus from Moscow or the Americans will divide us without our participation on reservations, eh? Ramzan Kadyrov (President of the Chechen Republic), whatever he may be, but is now engaged in business, and very important. The Western press, I see, does not like him either, and this is the answer!

So, to take the positions won, listen to the fables “Voice of Freedom”, to follow the Western, and sometimes our opposition, press is just a crime!
In the North Caucasus there is a new technique in the first place, it is a necessity. To train our army professionally, financially and intellectually is our necessity, or others will do it. Do we need a new Maskhadov, aaaa?

Well, of course, we send a lot of money to the Caucasus, but these are rubles, and you know that we can print rubles, as it does with US dollars, this is a plus, it is our currency.
Further, we must attack, seize, and not lose ground, and the deeper, the better, at least to Turkey!

In conclusion I want to say: it is better to help with money than tens of thousands of deaths of our soldiers and comrades. What i'm sure about
Caucasus-2 Plan. Metastases

Continuation of the film by Anton Vernitsky, filmed in 2008 year and telling about events in the North Caucasus in the beginning of 90, as well as plans (and attempts) of Western intelligence services to divide Russia.
“The protagonists of the film are gang members operating in the Russian North Caucasus and hiding behind the slogans of" pure Islam. How these pseudo-religious groups rob businessmen, divide booty, and at whose expense they exist at all, "says A. Vernitsky. The film makes public notes from the notebooks of one of the murdered terrorists, which describe financing schemes, the way of life of the bandits, as well as their connections with foreign countries.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech e-mine
    +15
    2 January 2012 09: 06
    A thin world is better than a good WAR - a completely logical article.
    1. YARY
      -2
      15 March 2012 14: 28
      This expression is typical for people with a masochistic bias! How "thin"? We will not fight, but will we put our daughters under Chechen? And wives at the same time? And you will spread the mobile on blue? And will you feed them more? And wipe yourself when they spit at you? How "thin"?
      You have to be very careful with expressions!
      If for garlic, then, to smoothen all this scum with the earth in a smart way (they’re just naked masochists, they’ll only force power) at the very beginning. But we have one problem - the people are betraying us all the time. And then after dividing the remaining truth, most of them are Cossack villages! We can cut a couple of mountains into poverty.
      And the cries of any liberal riffraff, this is for the faint of heart.
      War is dirt, but when you clean it you always get dirty!
  2. +6
    2 January 2012 09: 18
    The article is logical, I agree with the author. Here and one more thing you should not forget. Kadyrov will tear with a finger anyone whom Putin points to him. The Georgian conflict is vivid evidence of this. Was this possible in the nineties? So there are more dividends from investments in the Caucasus than from buying real estate in London ...
    1. 0
      3 January 2012 20: 58
      I agree, the Georgians were very much afraid of the Chechens in Ossetia.
  3. +8
    2 January 2012 09: 30
    Serge, salute! Thoughts are true and direction is the same! I support!
    1. Sergh
      +3
      2 January 2012 12: 07
      Valera, thanks brother! Land Happy New Year! Happy New Year to all men!

      Do not judge me harshly as you could, so managed!
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        0
        3 January 2012 08: 13
        Well done brother thanks for the article he himself served in Ingushetia a lot of enough shit. One thing I know is our people and you can’t leave them then when we recover again and set up our life all this will be forgotten like a bad dream.
  4. dred
    +1
    2 January 2012 09: 40
    For some reason the Caucasus has now risen.
    1. +1
      2 January 2012 09: 44
      Kadyrov rose, the Caucasus is still as deep, But he is better than everything that came before him
      1. +3
        2 January 2012 16: 01
        You are apparently poorly informed about the changes in Chechnya!
      2. knight 77
        +1
        24 January 2012 20: 49
        they live now on your money and spit in the face of everyone, only the money runs out and everything starts on a new grandmother do not go
  5. +5
    2 January 2012 09: 50
    only people who do not know how to think at least 2 steps forward, or enemies can stand for separation of the Caucasus
    give the Caucasus it will mean not only the destruction of Russia, but also the destruction of Russian
    1. +3
      2 January 2012 09: 57
      And there is...
    2. +2
      2 January 2012 15: 39
      We have many who want to divide Russia, to give up the lands that our ancestors have been collecting for centuries. Gorbachev and Shevarnadze, Putin and Medvedev. Americans, Chinese, Norway, etc. Section of the USSR. Enough. Our ancestors are turning over in our grave, looking at our mismanagement. You must first save what is left, and then take all measures and collect stupidly given. Entering into various alliances with the countries of the former USSR, we will unite in a single space. Then we will not be ashamed of our children and grandchildren. The Caucasus has been and should remain a part of Russia for centuries.
      1. Sergh
        -2
        4 January 2012 08: 02
        AleksUkr , it’s strange, but I didn’t understand you, somehow you cunningly spread your thoughts. Putin is talking about Russia, and it seems he hasn’t noticed.
  6. +8
    2 January 2012 11: 15
    Better in the Caucasus than in London and Courchevel ...
  7. wall
    +4
    2 January 2012 11: 38
    The author needs to work a bit on the presentation style. The article is not bad, but more like a regular commentary, rather than journalism. Also found some grammatical errors. But I write this in the order of constructive criticism.
    According to the article. I do not agree with (quote): Well, of course, we are sending a lot of money to the Caucasus, but it’s the same rubles, but you understand that we can print rubles as we do with $ UWB, this is a plus, this is our currency.. You can’t argue like that. Without going into economic details, I’ll say that only the USA has the right to print as much money in the current financial system. And then, unlike the prevailing opinion, this is a serious burden for their economy and entails a significant number of minuses. Non-cash money is another matter. Amerikosy release them in huge quantities (much larger than cash) and in order to protect the economy from a collapse, this non-cash money is launched on the stock market. In short, I can give anyone interested in all these calculations. Printing money in Russia is de facto tied (in a general sense) to the number of dollars that our central bank buys from the United States. The ruble is secured by the dollar. Again, officials reject this, but I can provide links to analytics on this topic.
    To summarize, I can say that you can’t just take and print as much as you need. This is money RELEASED from the budget. These are our taxes with you and I really want to believe that they go to the goals that our country needs.
    1. Sergh
      +3
      2 January 2012 12: 40
      wall , somewhere I’ll make mistakes by mistake and I agree, but I wrote all the text from my head. Pencil five sheets on both sides scribbled and rules. Of course, I didn’t finish a lot, I’ve corrected a lot now, but thanks for the answer! +
    2. 0
      2 January 2012 16: 04
      Nagging is out of place, this is not the site of publicists. Would you like to discuss your style in the "literary newspaper"!
      1. wall
        0
        2 January 2012 22: 57
        Okay, okay, I am already writing in "literature".))) Distinguish, dear, nagging from constructive criticism. And Sergh didn't hire you as a lawyer.
      2. wall
        +3
        2 January 2012 23: 02
        From Wikipedia: Journalism (from lat. Publicus - public) - a genus of works devoted to pressing problems and phenomena of current life and society; plays an important political and ideological role as a means of expressing the pluralism of public opinion, including the one emerging around the acute problems of life.
        Dear, and the site WHAT is then ???
        PS In my criticism of the respected Sergh article there was no negative message, but only wishes. This is called constructive criticism. We all have room to grow, right?
        PPS I apologize if I wrote something wrong.
        1. Sergh
          -1
          4 January 2012 08: 10
          wallthanks bro-lo! Everything is very clear and intelligible! Happy New Year!!!!!
  8. +2
    2 January 2012 11: 59
    Full support to the author .... Chechnya shepherd over the Caucasian herd. What else to think of, so that we would not be bitten ...
  9. +3
    2 January 2012 12: 31
    Even if they write something negative about the Caucasus and Kadyrov, he’s done well. He put things in order in the republic and keeps it tight. Look at what’s happening in Dagestan. Priests are even killed, which is inconceivable in modern Chechnya. Yes, and tell me which region is not We would have been stealing less budget money from local officials, believe me, it would have been possible to use the day of the capital city of a certain region, to arrange a firework no worse than in the formidable 2011
  10. +1
    2 January 2012 13: 06
    What Ramzan Kadyrov says about Russians

    http://oko-planet.su/politik/newsday/95079-chto-ramzan-kadyrov-govorit-o-russkih
    .html
    1. 0
      2 January 2012 16: 00
      and what about?
      and then on the page it is written that this topic is not
  11. +1
    2 January 2012 14: 42
    It’s necessary to think of this: -to feed Kadyrov- turn on the printing press to the full. Even funnier: Chechnya will separate, Siberia or the Far East will immediately separate .... you can add: the Kremlin will immediately separate from Moscow ... They always hated and hate Russia and all their loyalty will disappear as soon as the money river disappears, or someone will pay more. Mercenaries in one word.
    1. 0
      2 January 2012 16: 49
      Quote: xabaroff.ven
      Even funnier: Chechnya will secede, immediately Siberia or the Far East will secede ....

      and this is funny, it's real.
      there will be a precedent, the collapse of course will not happen the next day, but a year - three is quite real
  12. +3
    2 January 2012 15: 43
    FEED OR DO NOT FEED?
    Perhaps there is no choice, but the process of the formation of the republics of the Caucasus should have a definite goal, and not as it is now. To feed, to feed! The construction of factories, social guarantees for the population, and perhaps the most important aspect is the payback of the republics, they should start earning money themselves !!!!!!!!! Enough raw materials and human potential in the Caucasus can return these regions to a number of economically developed territories, Of course, a set of measures is required here and not only everything is tied to money.
    1. -2
      2 January 2012 16: 08
      Nonsense you do not know about the changes in Chechnya! Yes, at the moment they are being fed so as not to stir! But the actions carried out in the republic allow us to say that in 10 years it will be one of the most calm and at least the most loyal republics!

      And this is the main goal! ! !
      1. +2
        2 January 2012 16: 29
        Do you remember Tatarstan 90s !!
      2. -1
        2 January 2012 16: 52
        Money goes to create jobs in the first place. Yes, part of the money is stolen, but such is our country and such is the price of geopolitics! ! !
  13. +1
    2 January 2012 18: 14
    Chechnya is needed, but still in Dagestan and Ingushetia to restore order ..... This is all an important part of our southern borders. You have to keep it at all costs!
  14. +3
    2 January 2012 18: 17
    It's a shame and sad when_ "The money is sent to ..... and some of the money will be stolen" - is that what we just score% on theft? Any subsidized region in Russia produces something, people everywhere work and there are objective reasons for the need for subsidies, in most cases, the Caucasus has never worked, lived by theft and robbery, which was the reason for the war between the Russian Empire and the mountaineers.
    1. +1
      2 January 2012 18: 38
      your suggestions?!
    2. +2
      2 January 2012 18: 58
      In Soviet times, for some reason, it worked perfectly ....
      1. +4
        2 January 2012 20: 03
        In Soviet times, mainly Azerbaijan-drilling equipment, refrigerators worked there ... Armenians, Georgians are trade, workshops and co-workers in Russia. But I don’t know what to remember about the North Caucasus. My suggestions, considerations: -they should not live better than us at our expense, and therefore a phased decrease in subsidies, let them start working and feed themselves. Allocate money only for specific projects of industrial enterprises, and not casinos, restaurants and distilleries.
        1. +1
          2 January 2012 20: 12
          Dagestan - defense production: plants "Dagdizel", "plant of precision mechanics", "Izberbash plant of radio electronics"; agriculture: animal husbandry, winemaking, fruit growing, seven (!) fish farms, canneries (I’m not ready to say how many, 5 are functioning today). Mining of oil and gas. Tourist cluster. They worked beautifully, lived beautifully and, most importantly, peacefully. Now it is too late to revive all this, you only need a strong-willed decision of Moscow + control over EVERY budget penny.
          1. +2
            2 January 2012 20: 31
            Yes, this is the whole crap. Neither they nor Moscow need tight control of every penny. Otherwise, there are no kickbacks, no cuts. Kadyrov would not have to flaunt expensive stallions, palaces, etc. by this he simply substitutes his financiers.
  15. +3
    2 January 2012 20: 54
    Quote: xabaroff.ven
    Allocate money only for specific projects of industrial enterprises, and not casinos, restaurants and distilleries.

    At the moment, this phrase is the most truthful .... I would also like, of course, there are good fortified Russian military bases there, but ........ where is the guarantee that in the event of a conflict associated with the weakening of funding for Chechnya ("they say, work yourself now - more we will not feed ") they will not turn towards us? And the equipment will be captured ........ as it already happened once, and since all this is read by many former and active military personnel, I think many of those present here do not need to explain what I mean.
    1. +1
      4 January 2012 16: 54
      So after all, for that policy exist. Their bread. Basayev, after all, also at first fought for Russia's interests in Abkhazia. Who let him and his ilk off the leash?
  16. Sergh
    0
    4 January 2012 08: 18
    Thanks to all the guys. Regardless of the comments, I put all the advantages in a row, on the whole page!
  17. 0
    4 January 2012 12: 49
    The Caucasus is ours! This is our cow and we milk it, despite the fact that we pump in the money.
  18. 0
    4 January 2012 16: 15
    Quote: sprut
    This is our cow and we milk it

    It is said of course strongly, but here the Caucasus still milks us at the moment, I think it is visible to everyone lol lol lol PS and the ratio of costs and milk yield is really not in our favor so far :) :) :)
  19. +1
    4 January 2012 16: 49
    I would like to propose to consider the issue from another perspective. The problem is not new for Russia. And who fed the Cossacks to protect the southern borders from the Turks and Krymchaks? It was then that the Cossacks of the empire swore allegiance, and at first they were still robbers. So what? What is the damage?
    Remember the same Caucasus. Yes, Ermolov has almost been genocidal. What next? Caucasians in the personal protection of the king were. And no one objected.
    Russia has a rich history, if we have to pay, if it does not help, we can multiply by 0. Well, what is being stolen, so where are they not stealing now? Wild? Well, they are there in the mountains and have never been particularly civilized, and now for 20 years, a whole generation of devastation that can only fight and knows how. So they either need to be re-educated slowly, or exterminated under the root. Who is closer. By the way, supporters of extermination can try to figure out what it will cost financially, maintain an army in conditions of hostilities, not even mentioning the losses.
    1. +3
      4 January 2012 17: 14
      I agree with you. I live near the Caucasus - in the Kuban. Fortunately, I did not participate in the database. This moment does not prevent me from discussing on the forum. I have given my debt to the country and am going to continue. Our country is multinational - accordingly, it is necessary to have talent for its leadership.