Military Review

"Kalashnikov" began serial supply of assault and transport-landing boats for special forces

37
Concern "Kalashnikov" started serial deliveries of transport-assault and assault boats for special forces units, reports press office enterprises.

“A single combat group of boats was developed on an initiative basis together with specialists from the security forces of the Russian Federation and includes the newest troop carrier BK-16 and the assault boat BK-10”,
says release.

“In 2015, the vessels successfully passed the tests and were put into service with the Russian army. According to their technical characteristics and equipment, our boats are not inferior to their foreign counterparts, but at the same time they greatly benefit in price, ”the press service of the concern’s general director Alexei Krivoruchko quotes.



It is reported that “the crew of the BK-16 transport boat is 2 man, the passenger capacity is 19 man, the boat is able to reach a speed of up to 42 nodes with the maximum power of each 780 engine. with., cruising range is at least 400 miles. "



In turn, “the maximum speed of the assault boat BK-10 is at least 40 nodes, the special personnel onboard is 10 people, while the crew size is 2 people”.

The press service noted that “boats can be equipped with weapon systems for specific requirements and tasks, in particular, the BK-16 can be equipped with four 7,62 mm caliber machine guns in combination with either a combat module, or two mm 12,7 machine guns, or with a grenade launcher caliber 40 mm. "

"The technical ability to develop the same speed of at least 40 nodes and a guaranteed cruising range of at least 400 miles allows boats to work in a coordinated way to perform a single combat mission, providing high-speed delivery of the assault assault group to the coast, fire support for the actions of special forces and marines, prompt execution of patrol, sabotage and anti-sabotage operations, ”the message says.
Photos used:
http://kalashnikov.com
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Khariton
    Khariton 6 July 2016 18: 23
    +8
    In vain we scolded (2-3 years) Concern "Kalashnikov" when they began to reform and optimize it ... They take everything and "Kalash" increases the output! Well, God forbid ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Dimontius
      Dimontius 6 July 2016 18: 34
      +32
      this is a joke?? American-Japanese engines mercury !!! fool that we can’t come up with our own engines even in the defense industry, even for slightly larger than fishing boats ?? !! with the subsequent transfer of technology to a civilian ... or is it like ms-21? Any buildings in the garage at home, if you wish, can be assembled, but try to assemble the motor !!! without a motor your enclosures, like scenery for a movie !!
      1. razmik72
        razmik72 6 July 2016 18: 40
        -4
        It would be useful to produce such boats in a civilian version, there will be a lot of buyers there. In the military version, demand will be limited.
      2. SSeT
        SSeT 6 July 2016 23: 00
        -3
        Why are you yelling? do - we deliver, nevapros. Only now they’re not becoming chegoy! request
    3. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 6 July 2016 18: 35
      +3
      Assault boats? Concern "Kalashnikov" surprised, honestly. But pleasantly surprised.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 6 July 2016 19: 04
        +11
        The flagship is the Rybinsk version of the Raptor.

        If it’s simple, Pella worked with the Swedes and localized CombatBoat 90.

        Rybinsk made a pirated copy, and the Swedes burned a little.
        “Although the BK-16 looks like an obvious imitation of the SV 90, representatives of Rybinsk Shipyard claim that they designed the boat themselves. However, the prototype is not hidden, and information about the BK-16 is illustrated on the Euroverf website with a photograph of American boats of the SV project 90. "

        Well, there were a number of differences, a more comfortable fit, improved living conditions (latrine, small galley), a number of changes in the ship itself.

        Plus Rybinsk generally saws a car of everything:
        BK-8, BK-9, BK-10 - theirs, though spied on in the west.
        The BK-16 is the CB-90 / Raptor, with some modifications.
        BK-18 is approaching - it will be larger, have its own boat and helicopter-type UAVs, 26 tons against 19 for BK-16.
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 6 July 2016 21: 44
          0
          Rybinsk made a pirated copy, and the Swedes burned a little.

          Pirated copy with improved performance characteristics? So this is called IMHO reverse engineering
        2. teron
          teron 8 July 2016 11: 58
          0
          Competent plagiarism - 50% success!
      2. Blondy
        Blondy 6 July 2016 21: 30
        +2
        Quote: Reserve officer
        Assault boats? Concern "Kalashnikov" surprised, honestly. But pleasantly surprised.

        Who surprised, and who thought: Khan rifleman.
    4. Teberii
      Teberii 6 July 2016 18: 39
      +4
      Even if they are engaged in fodder, the main result.
      1. Orionvit
        Orionvit 6 July 2016 22: 15
        +2
        Yes, the result is the main thing. I recalled two Ukrainian armored boats, which they had been doing for more than two years, but now they have not been able to bring them to mind for eight months. The difference is on the face.
    5. Pavel1
      Pavel1 6 July 2016 18: 41
      +2
      this boat with inflatable sides resembles the painting "Grandfather Mazai and the Hares". Just a great target for a machine gun. Nobody will survive. In my opinion, it's just a western fashion to make such boats for the Baltic states. A military boat must have a high speed and be protected from enemy bullets.
      1. razmik72
        razmik72 6 July 2016 18: 45
        0
        Quote: Paul1
        this boat with inflatable sides resembles the painting "Grandfather Mazai and the Hares". Just a great target for a machine gun. Nobody will survive. In my opinion, it's just a western fashion to make such boats for the Baltic states. A military boat must have a high speed and be protected from enemy bullets.

        No matter what speed a military boat has, it won’t protect it from bullets. Armor can protect against bullets, but it’s hardly worth it on a patrol boat of this type.
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 6 July 2016 19: 14
        +6
        So they are not made under a head-on collision.

        And then, today every self-respecting gang (I am silent about the army) has a Toyota / Mitsubishi, and they put there not only DShK, but also KPTV, moreover, ZU-23 are not uncommon. This pickup truck will cover any boat, even AMG + Kevlar at Raptor, only for the infantry rifle.

        Well, to sink such a boat is more difficult than it seems, single lumbago will not give anything, and in the state of breaking through all the cameras, the Raptor will also die from such a density of fire ...

        But such boats have their advantages (for transportation, weight). Their destiny is the landing of SPN groups with increased stealth, airborne transfers, etc.

        Well, the American customer analogue BK-6, 8, 10 - uses similar boats.
    6. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 6 July 2016 19: 02
      +3
      Quote: Chariton
      "Kalash" also takes over everything

      "The trouble is, since the pies will start the cobbler oven,
      And boots stitch pastry:
      And it will not work well,
      Yes, and a hundredfold
      What who loves to take someone else’s craft,
      He forever others stubborn and foolish;
      He’s better to ruin everything
      And glad soon
      The laughing stock of becoming light
      Than honest and knowledgeable people
      Ask il to listen to reasonable advice. "

      "Pike and the Cat" (1813)
      Ivan Andreevich Krylov

      Except for the Kalashnikov, there is no one to deal with boats? Or, instead of the laborious development of small arms, they decided to start with the quickest thing? They would immediately start pouring vodka. request
      1. ARES623
        ARES623 7 July 2016 06: 09
        +1
        Quote: Vladimirets
        "The trouble is, since the pies will start the cobbler oven,

        Earlier, in Soviet times, a laundry room, a canteen, and repairs of all kinds coexisted under one director in a "household". And everything worked quite successfully. Apart from bulldozers, the "katarpiller" corporation produces footwear and a bunch of household trash. And that didn't make the bulldozer any worse. Kalashnikov is developing as a diversified concern, and rightly so. The need for boats for various purposes in the Navy is great, it makes sense to work under long-term contracts with a long series. In order to conduct deep R&D in the main industries, it is necessary to earn money wherever possible. I do not think that gunsmiths saw boats in their free time from their main work. smile
    7. Oleg14774
      Oleg14774 6 July 2016 19: 03
      +2
      Quote: Chariton
      release increase! Well, God forbid ..

      This is certainly great, but the "Mercury" engines are certainly not good.
      1. Khariton
        Khariton 6 July 2016 19: 45
        0
        Quote: Oleg147741
        Quote: Chariton
        release increase! Well, God forbid ..

        This is certainly great, but the "Mercury" engines are certainly not good.

        Well try your hand look for a niche .... Is it bad in the current fierce competition? Will be his ... I'm sure! hi
    8. APASUS
      APASUS 6 July 2016 20: 17
      +4
      Quote: Chariton
      In vain we scolded (2-3 years) Concern "Kalashnikov" when they began to reform and optimize it ... They take everything and "Kalash" increases the output! Well, God forbid ...

      I think that it’s not hell to do more to Kalashnikov how to deal with ships and aircraft!
      1 All redid in small arms, reached inaccessible heights?
      2 At the moment, the development of machine guns and missile armament for UAV systems and remotely controlled marine systems is required.
      3 Development of systems for remote control of weapons, control of systems for remote reloading and diagnostics of weapons, temperature sensors of weapons, systems for aiming and firing control, for UAV complexes and remotely controlled marine systems is required
      In a place to deal with weapons issues, the development and production of new ones, they started riveting boats!
      Madhouse !!!
      1. In100gram
        In100gram 6 July 2016 20: 28
        +2
        Quote: APASUS
        I think that it’s not hell to do more to Kalashnikov how to deal with ships and aircraft!

        This is why the concern is made for multidiscipline. Narrow specialization does not really allow you to survive in a "market" economy. They do it right. Weapons SYSTEMS are in demand in the world, and cooperation does not always work as it should. And who will pay for new military technologies? Within the concern, this is more correct and understandable
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 7 July 2016 18: 02
          0
          Quote: In100gram
          This is why the concern is made for multidiscipline. Narrow specialization does not really allow you to survive in a "market" economy. They do it right.

          What are you saying? It’s hard for the arms manufacturer to live, and everyone, as paper producers live, is probably starving.
          Quote: In100gram
          Weapons SYSTEMS are in demand in the world, and cooperation does not always work as it should.

          And because of this, Kalashnikov will produce everything from a bolt to a corvette, so where is the cooperation here? At the same time, Kalashnikov becomes a competitor to existing enterprises and for real promotion he needs tremendous funds to invest in an unusual asset. And where are the successes in directly producing weapons.
          Quote: In100gram
          And who will pay for new military technologies? Within the concern, this is more correct and understandable.

          And really who? In the state concern they will find Vasya Altruista who will invest money ????
          Or maybe just the managers in Kalashnikov got a good job at the government expense ?????????????????????
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 6 July 2016 20: 43
        +1
        Quote: APASUS
        I think that it’s not hell to do more to Kalashnikov how to deal with ships and aircraft!

        As far as I understand, under the brand name "Kalashnikov" various enterprises operate, some of which have nothing to do with small arms at all.
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 7 July 2016 18: 07
          0
          Quote: Dart2027
          As far as I understand, under the brand name "Kalashnikov" various enterprises operate, some of which have nothing to do with small arms at all.

          You understood correctly, only the unusual asset of the Company did not come from anywhere, it was acquired at the state expense.
          Soon, Kalashnikov will be able to bake gingerbread cookies, produce balls and pipelines. Someone has a very weak hand in the government and instead of real developments, the asset is inflated with an unusual profile.
          We already have Rossnano !!!
  2. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 6 July 2016 18: 25
    +3
    Unusual products for an enterprise whose main profile is small arms for various purposes ... However, Glock, now famous for its wonderful weapons products, was once engaged (who would have thought!) In the production of earthmoving equipment ... ...

    Assault (landing assault) boat BK-10 ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 6 July 2016 19: 18
      +3
      Very familiar. Rybinsk shipyard has been releasing any such thing for a long time. Just her concern Kalashnikov bought wink .

      No new production if that. Everyone is doing what they did before, just instead of the Rybinsk Shipyard, the Kalashnikov Concern.
  3. vostok1982
    vostok1982 6 July 2016 18: 42
    +4
    By Ukrainian standards, pull on a corvette!
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 6 July 2016 19: 52
      +2
      Quote: vostok1982
      By Ukrainian standards, pull on a corvette!

      laughing laughing Well, who is sitting in Kiev now, yes ... And before Ukraine, EVERYTHING was built and produced! Now farmers from Galicia rule ... Already started selling black soil in the EU!
  4. Clueless
    Clueless 6 July 2016 18: 47
    0
    Quote: Dimontius
    this is a joke?? American-Japanese engines mercury !!!


    You’d better turn your finger around your head :) For you have to be a complete fool to get a bunch of dough for such boats to develop outboard engines in Russia, given the very small circulation, they will cost 20 times more than foreign ones.
    1. almost demobil
      almost demobil 6 July 2016 18: 57
      +8
      Quote: Bad
      You’d better turn your finger around your head :) For you have to be a complete fool to get a bunch of dough for such boats to develop outboard engines in Russia, given the very small circulation, they will cost 20 times more than foreign ones.

      Does it ever occur to you that such a motor would have taken root in a civilian too? And could it be 20 times cheaper than foreign, well, not 20 so a couple of times?
      1. In100gram
        In100gram 6 July 2016 20: 31
        +1
        Quote: almost demobilized
        such a motor would have taken root very well in civilian life

        Is not a fact. The market for powerful outboard motors is very limited.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 6 July 2016 22: 11
          +1
          Is not a fact. The market for powerful outboard motors is very limited.
          Yes, this is in states where there are two oceans and a mild climate, everyone who can afford a motor boat or a yacht. You will look at satellite images, so in Florida or California, moorings with powerful boats from horizon to horizon. It's the same in the Mediterranean, especially on the Cote d'Azur. And in Russia, excuse me, where the climate is very harsh, where girls can be rolled. The Black Sea is small (compared to Russia), and the season is not there all year round. On the northern or in the Okhotsk sea, they are not needed for nothing. Hunters and geologists do not need such power. Only the military remains. For reference. In the early 2000s, Motor Sich also decided to enter the outboard motor market. It would seem that an engine-building enterprise that owns not weak technologies, produces the most complex aircraft engines, and it was not there. The motor was developed and made, but it was never brought to mind. "Mercury" didn't work. It's the same with the chainsaw. Which would seem easier? They made a saw, but to "Calm" it is the same far. So, it's not that simple. It was in the days of the USSR, ten, or twenty motors were needed, quickly developed and made. Nowadays, ten outboard motors are easier to buy.
        2. hobot
          hobot 7 July 2016 07: 31
          0
          and our country is huge and water resources are unmeasured so that the market is not limited, and everything except the defense industry is going on as it was from the 90s
      2. SSeT
        SSeT 6 July 2016 23: 14
        -1
        Where would you take root in a citizen, in what area? Tell me, wise guy!
        To begin with, the laws of the Russian Federation google for civil outboard motors .. fool
        1. Dimontius
          Dimontius 7 July 2016 00: 27
          +1
          and if the sanctions on these engines, since we put them on military boats? what to do? rowing oars?)))))
        2. almost demobil
          almost demobil 7 July 2016 04: 23
          +1
          Quote: SSeT
          de would take root in a citizen, in what area? Tell me, wise guy!
          To start, the laws of the Russian Federation google for civil outboard motors .. fool

          This is not about fishing scows, but about speed boats. Such boats, coastal prosperous citizens can afford (and allow). In addition, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, rescue centers, water police, all this is not the army, and domestic engines would find their niche, especially with the current idea of ​​import substitution.
  5. Khariton
    Khariton 6 July 2016 18: 57
    +3
    This is what the Kalashnikov Concern and Russia can be criticized for, why are they not fighting pirates who "churn out Kalash" around the world and in "civilized" countries, including ...? Yes, it is expensive and time-consuming, but it is a lot of money if we win the lawsuits!
    And according to the article, let them try themselves in different directions ... hi Russian weapons are no longer a brand, but a legend!
  6. Viking
    Viking 6 July 2016 19: 03
    +1
    And the first photo, as I understand it, "Raptor"? Why is it in the article?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 6 July 2016 19: 33
      +3
      No, this is BK-16.

      The raptor is Pella, or rather CB-90 localized with Swedish help.
      BK-16 is a pirate pirate copy, but with dopikami (no obligation), the landing has changed a bit from the main one, a compact galley for amphibious assault and two latrines appeared (the raptor has 1 Latron and 1 utility room with 2 microwaves and a pair of dummies), that is tightened habitability for longer flights.

      The board itself has also changed a bit; a Seatek diesel propulsion engine + Castoldi water cannons are used (at the Raptor Caterpiller + KaMeWa Rolls-Royce water cannons). Well, by the little things, by the way, again, the BK-16 landing is better - there are German armored seats with head support, and in the Raptor cheap adjustable ones, but again, you can put German ones in the Raptor.
  7. kytx
    kytx 6 July 2016 20: 33
    0
    BK10 has two "Mercury" 300 horsepower and a range of 400 nautical miles?
    vague doubts torment me (s)
    and the seaworthiness of this inflatable boat is doubtful.
  8. sabakina
    sabakina 6 July 2016 21: 49
    +2
    I do not trust these rubbers! From amers to take an example? Take our cop, hang a bulletproof gun ... No, rubber is bad.

    1. kytx
      kytx 6 July 2016 23: 04
      +2
      you shouldn't trust "rubber". all the more, wait, they no longer use rubber but PVC. in the sea, the correct inflatable with a hard bottom is weight, and this is not only my opinion. no wonder the border guards and others all over the world drive the zodiacs.
  9. Forever so
    Forever so 7 July 2016 00: 04
    +1
    Interestingly, are the balloons filled with foamed polyethylene at least ?? It seems that the Americans were bragging that such a balonet holds a bullet from a Kalash.
  10. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 7 July 2016 07: 28
    0
    special staff on board - 10 people

    Ek author in an article about fighters bent! Power!
    As for boats, I have ambivalent feelings: on the one hand, Russia, with its length of sea borders and the number of all different adversaries (be they pirates, poachers, or someone else), should have such boats without fail. And for me personally, it does not matter at all whether this is a development or honestly communicated with sworn friends and improved with a file. On the other hand, the basis of any vehicle is the engine. But with this we have a big problem. You need to either buy for the future or create something of your own. The second option, despite the whole set of hemorrhoids associated with it, is, in my opinion, preferable. We should have our own achievements in this area. Will it not be in demand now, will it turn out a little worse than foreign "Mercury"? And all the same. Let not 42 knots go, but let's say - 31 knots. The main thing is that they will walk if necessary, and not stand in hangars / warehouses / piers. And there, in a few years, we will reach 45 knots. With the help of a file and some mother)))
  11. Aviagr
    Aviagr 7 July 2016 09: 13
    0
    All this is good, but much more now we need robotic sailing catamarans (RPBK) with phenomenal autonomy and multifunctional underwater gliders (like GA-buoys, GA-responders, missile carriers, mines, antimines, etc.). Riding on boats is now possible only in Africa: a couple of ATGMs will imposingly close 20-30 km of the coast from such and more "armored" (Ukrainian Gyurza) vehicles ...
    For special forces underwater vehicles would be more suitable. But all the same - the preliminary reconnaissance and fire support should be provided by RPBCs and underwater gliders, as well as UAVs - it's time to learn how to protect people!