Military Review

"Extra people." How refugees were turned into an instrument of political speculation and incitement of religious hatred

24
Everyone knows about the massive influx of migrants from Africa and the Middle East to Europe. Far less attention is given to the acute migration problem in Southeast Asia. Meanwhile, it is in this region of the world that the situation very much resembles the “old Europe”, only the authorities of the countries of Southeast Asia are much tougher towards migrants. We are talking about the problem of Rohingya (or Rohingya) - Burmese Muslims, who in Myanmar (Burma) themselves are preferred to be called Bangladeshi migrants.

The Western media were the first to speak about the Rohingya problem, which was tasked to criticize the military regime of Myanmar for numerous violations of human rights and isolation policies. Then, since the Rohingya were Sunni Muslims by religion, television channels and newspapers of Muslim countries began to report about them. Rohingya’s large-scale clashes with Burmese nationalists and indigenous people, who, to put it mildly, are not delighted with the neighborhood of Rohingya, played their part.

Rohindz is very easy to distinguish from the Burmese. If the Burmese are Mongoloids, similar to other Indochina inhabitants, then the Rohingya are typical Black Caucasians, like other Bengalis. By placing Rohingya and Burmese next to them, any unprepared person can distinguish them, whereas it is impossible to distinguish Rohingya from Bangladeshi or Indian Bengalis, because they are representatives of the same people.

The epicenter of the events, which we describe below, is the state of Rakhine in western Myanmar, stretching along its western coast. Europeans are more familiar with the old name of the state - Arakan. The main population of this region is Arakans, a people who speak the Arakan dialect of the Burmese language and also practice the Theravada Buddhism. The main difference between Arakans and Myanmar (Burmese) is certain borrowings from Indian languages ​​and culture, as well as the presence of Indian impurities in the blood of many representatives of this nation. This is explained by the close proximity and close ties with neighboring India, primarily with Bengal. In the XV-XVII centuries. Arakan was an independent state, the religion of which was Buddhism, but also inhabited by very numerous Muslim communities. After the first Anglo-Burmese war, tens of thousands of peasants from British India began to relocate to Arakan — above all, ethnic Bengalis, many of whom were Muslims. Indian settlers worked on the Arakan rice plantations, gradually settled in a new place and turned into a new isolated group of Arakan’s population.

It should be noted that groups of the Muslim population, sometimes called "old Muslims", historically live in Arakan. The Burmese, even the nationalist-minded ones, have no questions for them - since time immemorial, these communities have been living in Arakan. The "old Muslims" include three groups. The first is kamana (or camana). Their name comes from the word “kaman” - “archer”, and designates descendants of Muslim warriors - Afghans, Arabs and Persians, who were hired by Arakan kings for military service. In addition, the same group includes the descendants of Persian, Arab, Afghan and Indian merchants who settled in Arakan. Kamanov is very much in Sittwe, on the island of Rambri. The second group is the Myeidu, descendants of temple servants and slaves, who have long spoken Burmese and settled in the Tandue region. Finally, the third group includes the “old Bengali people” who live in North Arakan and have long adapted to the living conditions in the neighborhood of Burmese Buddhists.

New Bengali migrants who are not in the above categories, and called "Rohingya". Between the Rohingya and the Arakans, numerous conflicts erupted regularly, based on economic contradictions, but quickly taking the form of religious opposition. In the 1942 year, during the Japanese occupation of Burma, a massive clash occurred that cost the lives of several thousand Rohingya and twenty thousand Arakans. In the 1947 year, when the formation of partisan armies of national minorities who were in favor of self-determination began, Rohingya was armed with all over Burma. North Arakan became the epicenter of the Mujahideen movement, which sent their representatives to Karachi - with a request to include the territory of North Arakan in the newly formed unified state of Pakistan as a result of the partition of British India.

"Extra people." How refugees were turned into an instrument of political speculation and incitement of religious hatred


As it is known, then Pakistan consisted of two parts - Western Pakistan (now - Pakistan) and Eastern Pakistan (now - the independent state of Bangladesh). North Arakan, with its Muslim population of Bengali origin, was supposed to be included in East Pakistan. But the Pakistani authorities did not go for it. By the beginning of the 1950's. units of the Burmese army were able to suppress the speeches of the Rohingya and the Mujahideen leader Kassim and his supporters fled to East Pakistan. In emigration, Kassim continued to be active in consolidating the Rohingya. In the end, in 1960, Kassim was shot dead in Cox Bazaar by unidentified persons, allegedly by agents of the special services. Nevertheless, the separatist Rohingya movement continued to exist and increasingly acquired a religious-political character, receiving support from international fundamentalist organizations. Some Rohingya have been trained in camps of radical organizations in Afghanistan and the Middle East. Radical organizations of religious and political persuasion were formed - the Arakan National Rohingya Organization (ARNO) and the Rohingya Solidarity Organization (RSO), some of whose activists were trained in training camps in Afghanistan, and then continued their subversive activities in Myanmar and Bangladesh.

The intensification of the radical groups of the Rohingya became another reason why the Burmese authorities and many ordinary Burmese began to insist on tough measures against the representatives of this people. Rohindz is accused of being illegal migrants from Bangladesh and not Myanmar citizens, which means they must go to their homeland. This is true of many Rohingya - the borders between Bangladesh and the Burmese state of Arakan are very transparent, and the migration of Bangladeshis to Myanmar still continues. It is connected with the fact that Bangladesh is the most overpopulated country in the world. It has overtaken the Russian Federation in terms of population, although its territory is smaller in area than most Russian regions. In Bangladesh, the price is every square meter of land. The population lives in terrible cramping and poverty, and next is Myanmar, which, although it is itself a poor country, but has more spacious land. The Burmese themselves, and Arakans in the first place, are very unhappy with the neighborhood with the constantly growing Rohingya community.



At the beginning of the 1970s, when war was going on in Bangladesh, many of the inhabitants of this country became refugees, fleeing, including in Myanmar. Refugees from Bangladesh have been welcomed by the Rohingya communities that have been living in Arakan for a longer time. This increased the number of Bengalis in Arakan. Currently, up to a million Rohingans live in Myanmar. Burmese Buddhists fear that the Rohingya, which have a very high birth rate, will continue to increase their numbers, which, in the end, will lead to the rejection of Arakan. In addition, Rohingya did not intend to assimilate, accept Burmese culture, do not want to follow the rules of behavior adopted in Burmese society. They live in closed enclaves, and radical modifications of religious fundamentalism are becoming increasingly common among young people. This, too, is frightening and repelling the Burmese, including those who have never been distinguished by nationalistic views and are normal to other peoples of multinational Myanmar. The inattention of the Burmese authorities to the problem of Rohingya has played its part. In fact, the government of the country still in the 1960-1980-ies "launched" the problem of Rohingya, which led to numerous conflict situations.

In 1989, color control cards for citizens were introduced in Burma. Full citizens received pink cards, associated - blue cards, naturalized - green cards. Rohindz did not receive any cards, which indicated only one thing - the authorities stubbornly refuse to see them among the citizens of Burma. However, in 1995, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees managed to start issuing Rohingya temporary white record cards. According to the legislation of Myanmar, such a card is not a basis for obtaining citizenship and it does not even indicate the place of birth of its owner. In addition, each Rohingya family pledged to maintain a family list, in which it was necessary to indicate the dates of birth of family members. For Rohingya a ban on free movement was introduced not only in Myanmar, but also in the territory of North Arakan. Even to move between their own settlements, Rohingya must receive special permits and passes. In 2001, due to the deterioration of political stability in the state of Arakan, the authorities imposed a ban on Rohingya from entering the capital of the state of Arakan Sitt.

Back in 1980-s. In Burma, the Buddhist nationalist movement began to form, which was in opposition to the national socialist authorities of this country and came out with even more radical positions in relation to migrants - Rohingya. Leading positions in the Burmese nationalist movement today are monks. One of them, Ashina Virathu (in the photo), is considered the recognized leader of the Burmese nationalists.

When, in Myanmar, in 2011, under pressure from Western countries and supporters of reforms in the country's leadership, large-scale reforms began to democratize the existing regime, the situation with Rohingya received publicity. The problem of interethnic relations in Western Myanmar has become known to the whole world. At the same time, the Burmese nationalists, who received the full support of the majority of the Arakan population, became more active.

The situation in the state of Arakan contributed to the adoption of a new law on population in 2015 in Myanmar, designed to monitor the socio-demographic situation in the country. The essence of this law is that the state is able to control the birth rate in certain regions of the country. At the suggestion of local authorities, the Myanmar government is given the right to introduce such demographic control measures as a ban on women from giving birth more than once every three years, administrative punishments for violations of this law. The Burmese really fear that the prolific Rohingya will inhabit all of Arakan. Buddhists living in Arakan are concerned that Rohingya Muslims already make up the majority of the population in the northern parts of the state. According to Burmese nationalists, this situation threatens Arakan’s religious identity. The government of Myanmar, which also considers Buddhism as the main pillar of national identity, is of course on the side of the Burmese nationalists. Although formally the government structures, especially after the reforms that began in 2011, oppose discrimination on national grounds, in fact they strongly support the movement of the indigenous population of Arakan.

Another wave of pogroms rohingya provoked the tragedy, which is guilty of a group of criminals, which, as you know, there is in any nation. 28 May 2012 The 26-year-old Arakan woman named Tida Htwe was raped and murdered by three young Rohingjas. After that, Rohingya pogroms began in the state of Arakan. The confrontation between the Burmese and the Bengalis - Rohingya, initially being ethnosocial, acquires a religious coloring. In many respects, it is also beneficial for the Rohingya, who receive support from international organizations, countries of the Middle East, legitimize the struggle for the creation of a Muslim state in North Arakan. By the way, the “old Muslims” of Arakan and other states of Myanmar mostly prefer not to support Rohingya, in order not to complicate their own position and not to quarrel with long-time neighbors - Buddhists, and the “indigenous Muslims” are very close to the rest of the Burmese, which can not be said recent immigrants from Bangladesh. "Old Muslims" in Myanmar, no one discriminates, in the capital Yangon and in many other cities there are mosques, many Muslims own a business.

- Burmese demonstration against Rohingya

When the Western and Middle Eastern media became aware of Rohingya’s position in Myanmar, they began a real campaign in defense of this national minority. Of course, in Myanmar, Rohingya is deprived of the rights enjoyed by the representatives of the indigenous peoples of the country - no one denies this. But the discourse about the economic discrimination of Rohingya looks like a clear exaggeration. In the not rich countries of Southeast Asia, most people live at about the same level, be it Bangladeshi Muslims, Rohingya refugees, Burmese or Thai Buddhists. As for the authorities of Bangladesh, they do not want to take their refugees back, since there is simply no place to place them.

The leadership of Myanmar clearly makes it clear that such a large number of Bangladeshi migrants in the country have nothing to do. Do not express any particular desire to take Rohingya and Myanmar’s closest neighbors - Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. The border services of these countries, most often, send Rohingya, trying to sail by boat from Myanmar, back. In fact, the Rohingya have become “extra people” who are being kicked from each other by the countries of the region. At the same time, although no one is actually going to change the situation of Rohingya, the United States, the countries of the Persian Gulf and international human rights and religious organizations are actively speculating on the topic of their situation. The Rohindz are used as a tool to stir up sectarian tensions in South-East Asia and put pressure on Myanmar’s authorities.
Author:
24 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aleksander
    Aleksander 5 July 2016 06: 14
    +5
    And after all, in many respects, this is all a consequence of colonialism of the West. It would be better today, he did not climb there, without him will understand ....
    1. Yars
      Yars 5 July 2016 10: 37
      0
      Quote: Aleksander
      And after all, in many respects, this is all a consequence of colonialism of the West. It would be better today, he did not climb there, without him will understand ....

      that's right, but they need global chaos, because they earn more money, and they don't give a damn about the fate of people .....
    2. Logos
      Logos 7 July 2016 00: 34
      0
      Is it the West to blame for the fact that semi-wild nations breed like rabbits and climb like cockroaches into those countries where the standard of living is at least slightly different from the traditional squalor of a patriarchal society?
  2. strelets
    strelets 5 July 2016 06: 32
    +1
    Poverty begets new poverty. Terrorists spawn new terrorists. How can they be helped at all? Contraceptives?
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 5 July 2016 06: 47
      +2
      Quote: strelets
      Poverty begets new poverty. Terrorists spawn new terrorists. How can they be helped at all? Contraceptives?

      To castrate them from firearms. First they must shoot them, and then hang them in the glory of Allah.
      1. guzik007
        guzik007 5 July 2016 07: 47
        -5
        To castrate them from firearms. First they must shoot them, and then hang them in the glory of Allah.
        ----------------------------------
        Let's start with you and your family.
        If you wrote it soberly and seriously, then read the Criminal Code. There for fascists like you and an article is available.
        Or maybe you are the Amur, whose ancestors of the indigenous population in the Far East greatly reduced, clearing a place for yourself? Then everything is clear. Genetics...
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 5 July 2016 08: 20
          0
          Quote: guzik007
          To castrate them from firearms. First they must shoot them, and then hang them in the glory of Allah.
          ----------------------------------
          Let's start with you and your family.
          If you wrote it soberly and seriously, then read the Criminal Code. There for fascists like you and an article is available.
          Or maybe you are the Amur, whose ancestors of the indigenous population in the Far East greatly reduced, clearing a place for yourself? Then everything is clear. Genetics...

          You yourself are a fascist! How do you propose to fight terrorists? Like Merkel, kisses? Today, the news was again like these refugees at concerts and rock festivals, in swimming pools, in tolerant Europe, in groups of 10-12 people, or raping children and they’re either trying to corrupt. Do you want this? Do you want your children to be raped somewhere in the resorts of Southeast Asia? The downside is not mine. I generally do not answer and do not react to such liberals, just again there is a report from Sweden on this topic.
          1. guzik007
            guzik007 6 July 2016 08: 15
            0
            You yourself are a fascist!
            --------------------
            And where did you specify about the terrorists? After all, you offered all together, t. with.
            So do not make excuses here with slogans and urapatriotic chatter.
            And then, where did such violent fantasies come from? not just to shoot, but to shoot the pricks first.
            It smacks of perversions. It's time to turn to a sex therapist. And then. It’s not even an hour. Somewhere in the park they will grab you over the next victim.: =)
            (I didn’t minus either)
        2. Pre-cat
          Pre-cat 6 July 2016 06: 13
          0
          Whose ancestors are indigenous people in the Far East
          Quote: guzik007
          greatly undersized, clearing a place for themselves?
          ? Are you digging up new historical facts? Or ? Or just a provocateur?
  3. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 July 2016 06: 53
    +1
    At the same time, although no one is really going to change the position of the Rohingya, the USA is actively speculating on the topic of their situation.

    Where there is economic trouble, the United States always appears with its canister of political salary, it’s a match.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 5 July 2016 10: 17
      0
      Quote: avg-mgn

      Where there is economic trouble, the United States always appears with its canister of political salary, it’s a match.

      Not only political, but also economic. But in the USA there are layers of the population that you can set on fire if you wish. They are not necessarily blacks, they are white with a low economic standard of living and low education. For different states, it is different but on average $ 2- 3 per hour. These are unemployed and people without qualifications.
      http://visasam.ru/emigration/canadausa/zarplata-v-ssha.html
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 July 2016 06: 54
    0
    Rohingya is used as a tool to foment inter-religious contradictions in Southeast Asia and pressure on the Myanmar authorities.

    There would be a desire (a specific task), but there is always a reason. If not Rohingya, then there are others. And few people are happy with refugees in their country, if only Angela Merkel is a joy to them.
  5. Darth Revan
    Darth Revan 5 July 2016 07: 51
    +1
    And again the same thing. Separation within their community, crime, unwillingness to be included in the life of the country that hosted them ... Who needs these?
  6. cdznjckfd
    cdznjckfd 5 July 2016 09: 30
    0
    I had several Burmese in my crew, not Rohingya, but also refugees who were ready for everything just not to return to Burma, incl. there are problems at every turn.
  7. VSZMK
    VSZMK 5 July 2016 10: 44
    -1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    only Angela Merkel are they in joy.

    We also have enough Jamshuds.
  8. Sagot
    Sagot 5 July 2016 11: 46
    +1
    They will not be able to absorb material assistance from the EU ...
  9. Tsoy
    Tsoy 5 July 2016 12: 29
    0
    Myanmar ... not the best place for its own inhabitants, not to mention the refugees. The military there all held by the throat not so long ago. Even now, reforms seem to have begun democratic, but according to the Constitution, the military has a quarter of the votes in parliament. Second place in the world for the supply of opium. 70% GDP agriculture.
  10. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 5 July 2016 15: 36
    +1
    Have you been from Europe for a long time? Dear AUTHOR?
    Over the past three months - I spent 24 days there.
    Something is not observed FLOW - as you deigned to say, refugees. No - of course I saw a couple of times, pushing small jewelry on the streets and intersections and more.

    Listen to you and state channels, so it seems that Europe is tryndets.
    Do you already believe that?
    Calm down hysterics - Europe is flourishing and does not know that its "end" has already been prescribed by Polonsky Ilya, Kiselev and other heralds of eternal "wisdom".
    1. Rivares
      Rivares 5 July 2016 16: 33
      0
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      Something is not observed FLOW - as you deigned to say, refugees.

      You may not be observing, while others are quite observing themselves. The OSCE, too, has not been observing fascists in Ukraine for 2 years with you.
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      Calm down hysterics - Europe is flourishing and does not know that its "end" has already been prescribed by Polonsky Ilya, Kiselev and other heralds of eternal "wisdom".

      It is already so thriving with all the new colors of the colored population that England is already running away.
      That's why she is eternal "wisdom" that the results will appear in a century)
      1. DimerVladimer
        DimerVladimer 6 July 2016 09: 53
        +1
        Do you have to mix themes? Ukraine has been attributed - is there a problem with logic somewhere?
        What kind of anxiety? Do not sleep at night - all about Europe you think, how is it there when it is bent?
        Relax - Europe without Russia lived and will live perfectly.

        Do not believe me - go to Europe, make sure.
        Your nonsense is for gullible grandmothers and Urya-patriots who are pleased to hear tales about the "curving" west and "crumbling Europe".
    2. Parsec
      Parsec 5 July 2016 16: 40
      0
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      Over the past three months - I spent 24 days there.


      Perception greatly depends on where you spent with whom you spent and why you spent it.
      1. DimerVladimer
        DimerVladimer 6 July 2016 10: 02
        +1
        And for work and for leisure, and in cities and provinces - yes there are refugees who crap with all sorts of rubbish (quite unobtrusively), washing car windows (I wrapped around 2000 km on rental cars in Europe - a little), selling napkins and so on.
        A control system is clearly built there, under the supervision of the police and the police act quite tough - no one wants to lose refugee status and be expelled at one point.
        Individual cases - inflated by the Russian media - these are individual specific cases.
        Unlike our police - in Europe you can’t pay off the police ...
    3. ilyaros
      5 July 2016 22: 32
      0
      That is, the authorities of the EU countries themselves lie about the influx of refugees? You are probably more familiar with the situation than the president of the Czech Republic or the prime minister of Hungary? And who then commits terrorist attacks in Europe or organizes riots? Many people do not know how the next street is called and they will assert that there is no such street in their city ...
  11. Olena
    Olena 6 July 2016 04: 12
    +1
    -What kind of refugees ..? -There is a general resettlement of the most backward part of mankind to areas of the best-favored nation ... -There is an ordinary migration ... -Moreover, 99,9% of these "migrants" profess Islam ... -But the Muslim world is silent ... he simply distanced himself from this Problems...
    -This problem was taken and "shifted" to European states ... -And where is the entire richest Muslim world ..? -In words in this "world" -all brothers and sisters ... -but in reality ..? -And in fact, this whole "brotherly world" for some reason does not seek to invite all this poverty to his home and take it under his wing ... -There are some donations, but this is completely different ... -And why Saudi Arabia , Qatar, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and the same Turkey, instead of tourists, will not fork out to receive such "their brothers" ..? -Does not organize them a permanent shelter and do not provide them with everything they need and does not "adapt" them for their state ..? -Because, given the "similarity of mentality" and "common faith" among all these peoples, everything could have been done quite successfully ... -Who is in the way ..?
    1. Logos
      Logos 7 July 2016 00: 42
      0
      And why Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and the same Turkey, instead of tourists, will not fork out to receive such "their brothers" ..?

      Maybe because the "brothers", according to their long-standing habit, will immediately begin to multiply uncontrollably in their new homeland and, as a result, will lead it to the same problems and to the collapse that led to the old homeland?
      By the way, the mentality of a resident of Turkey or the UAE is quite different from the mentality of residents of "failed states" like Yemen or Bangladesh. The former are at least a little civilized, and religion has nothing to do with it.
      1. Olena
        Olena 7 July 2016 04: 18
        0
        -Of course it differs ... -But not so much as the mentality of an indigenous inhabitant of Christian Europe differs from the mentality of a native of all these Afro-Asian regions professing Islam ... -Who is closer to whom, after all ..? -Just the richest Islamic states do not need such "brothers and sisters and all their numerous endless children" ... -They prefer to "empathize with them at a distance" ... -It is just incomprehensible-why is Christian Europe here ..? - But it is to this Europe that "Muslim blacks", Arabs, Pakistanis, Afghans, etc. are moving ... turn "... -Why are these questions not brought up to the international level .., at least to the level of UNESCO ..?