To the question of the global implications of the British Brekzit: one more drop of tar in the ointment is Austria, which would have miraculously escaped victory in the presidential election of Euro-friendly nationalist Norbert Hofer. Recall, at the last moment, voices sent by mail were somehow raspasovali. So, the Constitutional Court overruled the result of the euro-saving. No one will leave from "Ekzita."
"Voting to leave the European Union, which took place in Britain, is part of a tsunami, an anti-establishment process, sweeping Europe torn apart by contradictions," CNN broadcasts. Why are there Europe.
In an article by two trendy American analysts, Jan Bremmer and Nuriel Roubini, it says that there are no countries or blocs in the world that can follow the “global agenda”. “In the past few months, a group of countries - leading economies of the world - has evolved from a harmonious orchestra into a cacophony. This world is no longer the world of G-7 (“Big Seven”), not the world of G-20. This is the world of G-0.
From the film “The Golden Calf” (Mosfilm, 1968, dir. M. Schweitzer): “I will ask all witnesses to write down addresses and surnames! Who are the witnesses? Are you a witness? Show consciousness, civic activity, show your civic duty! ”
G-0 - global Exit. This is how it begins, the very de-globalization that “the Bolsheviks have been talking about for so many years”.
The first reaction to the Brexit, naturally, was the idea to rally around the European “core” and to take revenge on the English traitors so that others could not be discouraged.
The chairman of the European Council, Donald Tusk, said that the EU countries were “crystal clear” that it was understood that there would be no “default” access for Britain to European markets.
The head of the European Commission Juncker, speaking in the European Parliament, appealed to the leader of the British Independence Party Nigel Faraj: “You fought for the exit. The British people voted for the exit. Why are you here"?
While brutal ideas remain in the field of rhetoric. However, their practical application is able to finish off a sick European Union rather quickly.
“I think that it’s best to treat it in such a way as if the project of full European integration was paused. I would not exaggerate the meaning of this, ”said US President Barack Obama.
That is, the delicate attitude to the patient is to not focus on the agony - perhaps they will not notice. Already noticed.
The sharp reversal of Turkish politics and, above all, the forced settlement of relations with Russia is obviously not even connected with Brexit, but with the consequences it means for the fate of European integration. Be that as it may, Turkey has lost hope not only for EU membership, but also, to a large extent, incentives for such membership.
The world of G-0 forces countries with the will to sovereignty to build independent geopolitical structures that meet their sovereign interests.
“You, I think, will have many situations when people will want to return the borders. They want to take control of the money. They want to return a lot. They want to do so in order to have a country again, ”said Donald Trump.
It is characteristic that Trump speaks this in Scotland, which is going to leave Britain just because of Brexit. And, most likely, it will.
“I really see a parallel between what is happening in the United States and what is happening here. People want to see boundaries, ”Trump continues.
Trump is right. The exit of Britain from the EU and the exit of Scotland from Britain are phenomena of the same order. People want to see boundaries. Little nuance, sorry for gloating: when the British fleet starts to leave its home base in Scotland, we will recall Sevastopol. And if even Gibraltar ?!
From the film “Brother-2” (STV film company, 2000, dir. A. Balabanov): “You, reptiles, you will answer for Sevastopol too!”
What did you think? When in ten years the Prime Minister of England calls the disintegration of Great Britain a geopolitical catastrophe, it will probably be difficult to find a liberal fool who would declare him a revanchist.