Before 2018, 3 rescue boats of the 23370М project will be delivered to the Navy.

44
Three rescue boats of the 2018M project will be handed over to the search and rescue service of the Russian Navy to 23370. RIA News message from the representative fleet Igor Dygalo.



“It is planned that in the period from 2016 to 2018, the Navy’s search and rescue forces will be replenished with another three new multifunctional modular boats of the Navy’s search and rescue support,”
said Dygalo.

He noted that in total “the 2018 multifunctional boats of the 15 and 23370М projects will be part of the Navy by 23370”.

According to the representative of the Navy, “from 2013 to 2016 year 12 was delivered to the fleet of new multifunctional modular boats of search and rescue support of the 23370 project, the designer and builder of which is KAMPO JSC near Moscow”.



Dygalo recalled that "five of them were part of the Baltic Fleet, three boats — the Black Sea Fleet, four boats — the Caspian flotilla."

The 23370M project is an evolution of the 23370 base project. It is characterized by "increased dimensions and higher full speed."
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    25 June 2016 13: 27
    Shipbuilders really have Napoleonic plans. This is certainly great! I would like to see unusual projects.
    1. +22
      25 June 2016 13: 35
      Ehh, how I would like to read the article "By 2018, the Navy will replenish 15 destroyers."
      1. -5
        25 June 2016 14: 55
        Quote: Maksus
        Ehh, how I would like to read the article "By 2018, the Navy will replenish 15 destroyers."


        Why do we need 15 destroyers? Well, how much per day do the crews of sausage and bread bite? Isn’t it easier to stick a strategic missile into the center of EVIL? I need to be more rational, I think.
        1. +2
          25 June 2016 20: 23
          EVIL has too many centers, I want to breathe fresh air, and not radioactive ash. The destroyers - at the present moment - it is it, large, well-armed, multi-functional. The cruiser is now redundant, the submarine - not everyone can, the frigate - is too small. And at sea we will only have more problems. Japan, Turkey, NATA, this damn thing with Australia and Taiwan, and China is not a friend to us.
    2. +2
      25 June 2016 13: 41
      Need to save of course .... (children in the pioneer camp lost 14 people!))) Just stupid ... !!!! Also, the boys in battle just write off ..! Enough freaks making money on the lives of our children, and then the soldiers!
      Sorry guys just emotions ... A terrible tragedy!
      1. +8
        25 June 2016 14: 16
        Quote: Maksus
        Ehh, how I would like to read the article "By 2018, the Navy will replenish 15 destroyers."


        Of course I really want to, but the supply fleet also needs to be built and updated.
        1. +11
          25 June 2016 14: 41
          Quote: cniza
          Of course I really want to, but the supply fleet also needs to be built and updated.

          Build and upgrade needed. But it seems that the construction of each boat will soon become an occasion for news.
          1. +1
            25 June 2016 14: 45
            All is enough to maliciously ..! Let the fellows build !!!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. -8
        25 June 2016 15: 12
        Quote: Chariton
        Need to save of course .... (children in the pioneer camp lost 14 people!))) Just stupid ... !!!! Also, the boys in battle just write off ..! Enough freaks making money on the lives of our children, and then the soldiers!
        Sorry guys just emotions ... A terrible tragedy!


        But I’m wondering what kind of cattle Chariton minus? Here, it seems, some have problems with intelligence.
        1. +9
          25 June 2016 15: 28
          I put a minus for the discrepancy of the comment to the topic of the article. You need to write comments on the topic of the article, and not just what the left leg wanted. And you minus for the cattle.
          1. -6
            25 June 2016 15: 38
            Quote: Homo
            You minus for the cattle. You need to write comments on the topic of the article, and not just what the left leg wanted.


            I’m only minus the trolls here, actually. Like this:
            My right leg also wants something.
        2. -2
          25 June 2016 15: 33
          Quote: iliitch
          Quote: Chariton
          Need to save of course .... (children in the pioneer camp lost 14 people!))) Just stupid ... !!!! Also, the boys in battle just write off ..! Enough freaks making money on the lives of our children, and then the soldiers!
          Sorry guys just emotions ... A terrible tragedy!


          But I’m wondering what kind of cattle Chariton minus? Here, it seems, some have problems with intelligence.

          Correctly minus ... (off topic wrote) soldier It's easy on emotions! And here you are .... bully
      4. +4
        25 June 2016 15: 28
        Who about what and naked about the bath. Why this post? belay
    3. 0
      25 June 2016 17: 17
      Guys, I asked you to write a petition to remove the Mannerheim board. In this link it is
      http://politobzor.net/show-97512-za-chto-v-peterburge-demontirovali-pamyatnuyu-d
      osku-mannergeymu.html
  2. +3
    25 June 2016 13: 28
    Not only build combat ships, but also a support fleet. The rescuers have begun, other ships need to be updated.
  3. +1
    25 June 2016 13: 36
    Wai, macaw, NEWS !!!
    1. 0
      25 June 2016 13: 41
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      Wai, macaw, NEWS !!!

      Under the Armenian mow? smile .
      1. +2
        25 June 2016 14: 36
        razmik72
        Under the Armenian mow? smile

        Well, it’s not all the time to mow the Armenians under the Russians. laughing
        By the way, is there a fleet in Armenia? Well, there are cages with crayfish in Sevan for example feel
        By the way Ivan Arnoldovich hi If the same boat in Ukraine was launched into the water! And even three things. So I would tell you a colleague in the media there was a wave about the reigning power of ukroflot at least!
        1. 0
          25 June 2016 15: 54
          Quote: Observer2014
          Well, it’s not all the time to mow the Armenians under the Russians.


          wassat Mow and mow. Yes, how many of them are there in life? Everyone is pissed off, but how many of them are real, such as unfortunate, life-afflicted, A? You don’t drive me a little pichalka, lovers of shouting become poor, you have seen people like smart people.
  4. 0
    25 June 2016 13: 41
    He looks like a tugboat in profile. Or is the photo not his?
    1. +3
      25 June 2016 13: 48
      A boat can only have one number. On the gray board is written SMK-2171, on the black nose RB-50, in my opinion everything is obvious, there is a tugboat behind the boat.
    2. 0
      25 June 2016 13: 49
      Not like ... but a tug and tows it from the port side, RB-50 which.
      1. +2
        25 June 2016 14: 57
        RB-river tug is me as you write Astrakhan.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +6
        25 June 2016 17: 23
        Here is a photo more interesting, nothing like a tugboat:
        1. jjj
          +1
          25 June 2016 19: 55
          And in superstructures on the ground compression chambers for divers?
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. +2
    25 June 2016 14: 03
    Small, but remote! good Work hard worker, a lot of work! drinks
  6. +5
    25 June 2016 14: 07
    I can add a little: the fleet can be delivered by rail, in this case the hull catamaran is assembled on the spot - at least in Pacific. Container with diving equipment - module. It may vary depending on the tasks and the necessary equipment. The contours of the hull are quite simple - the cost of the vessel is not high, the speed is also. A shipbuilder and a manufacturer of diving equipment are one and the same legal entity; all technical issues are resolved locally.
    1. 0
      25 June 2016 17: 52
      So I thought, after seeing the photo, that this is a diving bot. And on the wave he is like an iron, probably?
      1. +4
        25 June 2016 20: 03
        Quote: Igor V
        So I thought, after seeing the photo, that this is a diving bot

        The way it is

        .

        .

        1. jjj
          0
          26 June 2016 12: 57
          Your pictures finally clarified the situation. A very needed ship
  7. +1
    25 June 2016 14: 34
    Judging by the shape of the boat, they made it a specialist for saved work. The rectangular shape makes it possible to quickly moor to a distressed person.
  8. +5
    25 June 2016 15: 07
    Rich, probably in content, but outwardly, "BARN"! It can be seen that it was designed in Moscow, the capital of all seas!))) For rivers, super!
  9. +3
    25 June 2016 15: 12
    The module is buzzing, but seaworthiness is none ...
    1. jjj
      0
      25 June 2016 19: 58
      I believe seaworthiness - points 5-6. Stability should be good. It does not matter to him the side to the wave or the stakes. Sailing is relatively small. Apparently, he’s rolling
  10. 0
    25 June 2016 16: 09
    Everything is in a piggy bank, useful, specialists know what the Navy needs.
    1. +4
      25 June 2016 19: 08
      You know, unfortunately, one gets the impression that there are no more specialists from the Rescue Service in the Navy! The boat presented in the article is good for a raid. The good thing is that it has a large enough deck area that allows you to place everything that is necessary for a specific task. That is, it can be equipped for the task - removed one container from the side, put others. But, take a barge, put a generator and containers with equipment on it, attach it to a harbor tug and it will be almost the same! But the main task of search and rescue support, the task of helping submarines that have lost the ability to surface, is being solved extremely slowly! The lesson of the Kursk has not yet been worked out. They built something like one Rescuer (pr 21300), putting on it an autonomous rescue apparatus instead of a rescue bell, got mired in scandals and with the subsequent construction quieted down !? And such Rescuers need at least two for each fleet!
      1. 0
        25 June 2016 19: 20
        This is only the beginning, but YOU, if you are cutting so much on this issue, help our weak authorities and government explain the need for what is needed for the Navy, because non-professionals and rams are sitting there to collect grandmothers, as it were for the budget ... is over and a new one will be when ...
        1. +3
          25 June 2016 20: 16
          My friend! I guess your sarcasm is not appropriate here. After all, it is possible to help only those who are ready to accept this help! Of course, common sense and engineering calculation are present in the construction of our modern Navy! But, the "rollback" value still prevails. Alas.
      2. 0
        26 June 2016 09: 35
        Quote: watermark
        But, take a barge, put a generator and containers with equipment on it, attach it to a raid tug and the same thing will happen!

        Just not compact and maneuvering is inconvenient, especially in narrownesses. In fact, it turned out to be a simple, cheap, multi-functional, mobile workhorse. Why not?
        1. +2
          26 June 2016 12: 05
          So I say - for a raid, a boat is not bad at all!
  11. 0
    25 June 2016 19: 23
    Boats are nothing, they will work for real minimal conditions, but no more ... so get them here, put them down, get them here ... Full-fledged rescue operations are very problematic ...
    1. 0
      26 June 2016 09: 55
      Quote: masiya
      Full-fledged rescue operations are very problematic ...

      If you notice these ships went to the Caspian, Black and Baltic Sea. Nuclear submarines are not going to save them and actions in the far sea zone are not supposed, there another class of court is needed. The keyword is multifunctional ... a car there drowned to raise or work what kind of underwater to carry out.
  12. +1
    25 June 2016 20: 16
    Quote: Maksus
    Ehh, how I would like to read the article "By 2018, the Navy will replenish 15 destroyers."

    Oh, how right you are! but even the 15 destroyers on the 4 fleet are not enough ... But the boats in Soviet times were not counted! Another thing is that in modern reality, with its kickbacks, cuts and bonuses, the price of a boat was equated to the price of a destroyer ... I myself work in the defense industry and, believe me, I know what I'm talking about ... soldier
    1. 0
      25 June 2016 20: 26
      Quote: tinibar
      Quote: Maksus
      Ehh, how I would like to read the article "By 2018, the Navy will replenish 15 destroyers."

      Oh, how right you are! but even the 15 destroyers on the 4 fleet are not enough ... But the boats in Soviet times were not counted! Another thing is that in modern reality, with its kickbacks, cuts and bonuses, the price of a boat was equated to the price of a destroyer ... I myself work in the defense industry and, believe me, I know what I'm talking about ... soldier

      Of course it’s not enough, that's why I wrote about 2018, and then more and not only destroyers are needed. We would have a helicopter carrier like Hyugi)))
  13. 0
    25 June 2016 23: 11
    In the Caspian, everything is in chocolate so far, this is the only Navy unit capable of fully performing the assigned tasks: 2 missile defense systems pr.1166.1 "Dagestan" with "Caliber-NK", "Tatarstan" finally got out of repair, so a new one was installed on it Radar "Hals".

    3 MRK pr.21631 with "Caliber-NK" together with "Dagestan" constituting the main striking force KFl, 3 IAC pr. 21630, RCA pr. 12411T R-101 "Stupinets" with anti-ship missiles P-15 (passes VTG), DKA 5 "Chamois", "Dugong", and three "old men" of Project 1204 will not fail.
    True, in 2014, 3 RCA pr.206M were withdrawn, but the boats themselves are old, and the P-15M does not meet modern requirements, and in a year one AKA pr.1204. Also unclear is the situation with the MAK-160 "Gomel" pr12411, which since the spring of 2014 does not go to sea and may also be decommissioned.
    RCA pr.124121 with Kh-35 "Uran" and 3 PrdKA pr.21980 "Grachonok" are planned for KFl
    There is a partnership with Iran, and the Navy of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan can not be taken into account. However, the number of IRAs pr 21631 on CFL plan to bring to the originally planned 6, after the end of the series for the Black Sea Fleet.
    Baltika, too, is not all that bad: "Persistent" pr. 956-flagship, despite constant problems with DKU, time sometimes goes out to sea, showing the flag. True, it is a little unclear what will happen to "Restless", they do not repair, and do not need to handing over ... SKR pr.11540 "Fearless" under repair by the end of the year, perhaps, at last it will be equipped with strike weapons, at least X-35 "Uran", as on "Wise". The second TFR project "Yaroslav the Wise" after almost a year of repairs has already been noted in Mediterranean.

    All 4 newest corvettes of Project 20380 (the situation with the "Guarding" is not clear, which after the fire on April 17.04.2015, XNUMX does not go to sea), regularly nightmare sprats and insignificant descendants of the Vikings.

    The strike forces of the fleet are old but still very effective 4 MRK pr. 12341 and 7 RCA pr. 1241 (2 pr. 1241T with anti-ship missiles P-15. Plus the newest Dugongs and Raptors. In 2013, the landing forces were reinforced by the repaired Zubr "pr. 12322" Evgeny Kocheshkov. "The situation with the submarine has improved a little: the B-227" Vyborg "was repaired, which allowed the B-471" Magnitogorsk "to go home from the Northern Fleet. At the end of the year, they plan to transfer the repaired B-806" Dmitrov "to the fleet. The main problem in the Baltic is the absolute obsolescence of 6 MPK pr. 1331M, which do not have missile weapons (the Strela-2M MANPADS does not count). If they can still fight with the Polish (former Norwegian) Cobbens, then against the newest German pr. 212A, and especially the Swedish "Gotlands" with VNEU are absolutely helpless. However, with the arrival of the newest corvettes of the project 20380, they continue to be written off, so in 2014 they wrote off the MPK-105. This year the BF should also transfer the newest BDK, project 11711 "Ivan Gren ", which went to sea for the first time today.
    1. 0
      25 June 2016 23: 27
      The situation at the Black Sea Fleet has also changed for the better: the First Investigative Committee of the project 11356 "Admiral Grigorovich" finally arrived in Sevastopol on June 9, and the second TFR of the "Admiral Essen" project, which was delivered on June 7, is also going to come there.

      The third ship of the project "Admiral Makarov" is undergoing mooring tests and is planned to be transferred to the fleet in August. It seems that they decided to complete the construction of the second three of the project, the construction of which was frozen due to the non-delivery of the gas turbine engine by Ukraine.
      The renovated old Petrevestniks - Ladny and Pytlivy - are serving in Mediterranean. Another "old man" SKR "Sharp-witted" is constantly running there.

      In 2014 the Bulgarians repaired the large landing craft of pr. 775 "Caesar Kunnikov", which was actively involved in the "Syrian Express". In 2015, the Black Sea Fleet received 2 MRK pr.21631 "Zeleny Dol" and "Serpukhov", which change each other in Mediterranean.

      The departure to the Zvezdochka for the repair and rearmament of the Moskva has been postponed and the fleet will not be left without a long arm and a flagship, since it has been decided to dispose of the Kerch. But here, too, different options are possible: from the inclusion of "Admiral Gorshkov" in the Black Sea Fleet, to the transfer of "Yaroslav the Wise" from the Baltic Fleet. Submarine forces have sharply increased - by the end of this on the Black Sea they plan to have 4 diesel-electric submarines of pr.636.3, two of which are B-261 "Novorossiysk" and B-237 "Rostov-on-Don" are already based in Sevastopol, and B-262 "Old Oskol "is making an inter-fleet transition.

      It will be followed by the B-265 "Krasnodar" and the fifth B-268 "Veliky Novgorod" on June 15 went to sea for the first time. She and the B-271 Kolpino are planned to be handed over to the fleet in November.
      Plus, by the end of the year, they plan to withdraw the B-871 Alrosa from repair. And in general, the situation will already become bearable.
      Next year, the Black Sea Fleet plans to transfer the third MRK pr. 21631 "Vyshny Volochek" which was launched on May 18 and the first patrol ship pr. 22160 "Vasily Bykoov" from the RC "Caliber-NK" in addition to 2 MRK pr. 1239 (MRK- 27 "Bora" passes VTG), 2 MRK pr.1234, 5 RCA pr.1241 (1 pr.1241T) and 6 MPK pr.1124 (MPK-217 "Yeysk" passes VTG in Sevastopol)
      I hope that the fleet will still include captured Ukrainian ships, at least the most modern ones: BDK pr. 775 "Konstantin Olshanskiy", MPK pr. 11124M "Ternopil" and "Lutsk" and SRZK "Slavutich".
      1. 0
        26 June 2016 00: 10
        Not everything is so good in the North. Due to problems with an unreliable control system, the "Admiral Kuznetsov" is more idle in the port than sailing at sea, as recently it was taken out of the dock at the 82nd Shipyard. And his air group is still incomplete, since the newest MiG-29Ks have not yet arrived and are being tested at the Nitka in Yeisk. The aircraft carrier requires major repairs, but due to lack of funding, the repairs are constantly postponed indefinitely. However, in the fall he will go to the BS in Mediterranean, possibly together with "Peter the Great".

        TARKR "Admiral Nakhimov" under repair until 2018. Only "Peter the Great" remains.



        The situation is no better with other ships of the 1st rank: the newest "Admiral Chabanenko" pr. 1155.1 is under repair until 2018, the "Admiral Ushakov" pr. 956 are not allowed further than Spitsbergen, from 3 BOD pr. 1155 which have essentially become "workhorses. "in the ranks of the BPK" Vice-Admiral Kulakov "; "Admiral Levchenko" and "Severomorsk" are awaiting renovation.
        The newest frigate of project 22350 "Admiral Gorshkov", which can be considered as a temporary replacement for "Chabanenko", after the repair of which there was not a single modern "running" strike ship left in the fleet to accompany the "Peter" and "Kuzi", in trial operation before the end of the year.
        [img] http://www.wrk.ru/forums/attachment.php?item=417905&download=1 [/ img]

        Due to problems with the gas turbine engine "Kasatonov" will be handed over to the fleet not earlier than next year. Things are no better afloat, despite the fact that SSBN K-2014 "Yekaterinburg" came out of repair in 84, replaced by K-114 "Tula", the transfer of the newest K-560 "Severodvinsk" pr. 885 to the fleet and the arrival of the end of 2013 B-585 "St. Petersburg" pr. 677, which is still listed in trial operation. So, out of 18 nuclear submarines, only 7 are in service (1 project 885, 2 project 949A, 2 project 945A, 1 project 971, 1 project 671RTMK). True, at the end of 2015, the B-336 "Pskov" pr. 945A and K-335 "Gepard" pr. 971 came out of repair. The diesel-electric submarine is no better off, despite the withdrawal from the modernization of the B-800 "Kaluga" and B-459 "Vladikavkaz".

        Thus, in addition to the "St. Petersburg" in trial operation, I am building 3 diesel-electric submarines: B-800 Kaluga, B-471 Magnitogorsk and B-459 Vladikavkaz. The B-402 Vologda will most likely be scrapped, while the B-808 Yaroslavl is being repaired at Zvezdochka. True, the B-177 Lipetsk returned from the Baltic Fleet, but immediately got up for repairs, and most of its crew was sent to Vietnam to help receive diesel-electric submarines of pr. 636.1. So far, no improvements can be expected here.
  14. +1
    26 June 2016 00: 51
    Pacific Fleet-full arctic fox. The core of the RRC fleet of pr.1164 "Varyag", 4 BODs of pr. 1155, of which only 1 "Admiral Vinogradov" is in service, and "Marshal Shaposhnikov" is undergoing repair and modernization until 2018, "Admiral Panteleev" is undergoing HTG until the end of this year and the destroyer pr. 956 "Bystry", which also passes the VTG after the voyage to the Indian Ocean. True, the BPK pr.1155 "Admiral Tributs" and BDK-101 "Oslyabya" should return from the repairs. .1164 "Marshal Ustinov." The dates of delivery of the first corvette of the ASZ "Perfect" pr. 20380 are shifted to the right, and knowledgeable people say that at best, but most likely in 2017. The situation with the TARKR pr. 1144.2 "Admiral Lazarev" is not clear. the situation with the submarine: out of 10 nuclear submarines in service only 3 (pr. 949A K-456 "Tver" and K-186 "Omsk" and K-150 "Tomsk"), however, allegedly repaired K-419 "Kuzbass" pr.971, why, allegedly, since she remained at the Zvezda-2 DVZ in Bolshoy Kamen. From 8 diesel-electric submarines-5. B-187 "Komsomolsk-on-Amur" (launched) and B-190 "Krasnokamensk" under repair. B-445 "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker" is likely to be decommissioned. However, last year, AICRSN Alexander Nevsky, pr. 955 Borey came to Vlyuchinsk.