Point of non-return
This war is thousands of years old. It does not stop for a second, it has no restrictions, no moral rules, it is total and comprehensive, it will last until complete destruction.
In different periods stories This war bore various names and was waged by various methods. Now it is called a hybrid, or network-centric. But its essence and its goals have remained unchanged over the millennia.
In the recent history, the achievement of geopolitical goals with the help of direct and brute military force has faded into the background as a last resort, too expensive and costly, both in terms of material and human resources, and in terms of efficiency. Much cheaper and more effective is the disintegration of states from within, the introduction of “their” henchmen to the key control nodes, the creeping seizure of the economy and finances, the introduction of religious, moral and ethical principles alien to the indigenous people, the disintegration of the people, its bleeding into other nations the crowd.
Of course, these goals cannot be achieved quickly, in a short period of time. Yes, and very harmful for the aggressor. Knowledge of the ultimate goal by the people can lead to its immediate and decisive rejection. Therefore, the final goals are skillfully masked and achieved by a whole set of time-stretched successive steps, each of which individually will not, at a minimum, cause rejection, but which ultimately lead to the main initial goal.
In modern politics, this method is called the "roadmap". The essence of the “roadmap” is to achieve, by small, seemingly completely unrelated to one goal, steps in various spheres of public life, public administration, morality, ethics, religion, such a “critical mass” of changes that will allow the global challenge of enslavement by revolutionary methods, the Orange Revolution. And then re-enable the next “road map”. Moreover, after reaching a certain “point of no return”, events speed up like an avalanche, and no one pays attention to the initial principles described in the “road map”. The principles of the new reality come into force, which is immediately declared unbreakable, unquestioned and eternal.
In the last century, Russia experienced two similar disasters: the collapse of the Russian empire and the Soviet Union. Each catastrophe began with beautiful words about freedom, equality, and prosperity, but through the cunning and cynical system of “road maps” invariably ended with the genocide of the Russian people.
The point of no return for the first was the manifesto of Nicholas II on the establishment of the State Duma of August 6 from 1905. In fact, this manifesto established in Russia a legislative body that was alien to it from a civilization. In place of the Russian catholicity came Western parliamentarism. (The purpose of this article is not to show the difference between Western parliamentarianism and Russian conciliarity. Those interested can independently to study this question.) After that, a quick change of the remaining institutions of the Russian Byzantine civilization by the liberal-democratic institutions of Western civilization became inevitable. And it happened in the 1917 year, a very radical and bloody thing happened. Civilization change has cost our people millions and millions of lives, almost complete loss of their faith, morality, national and ethnic characteristics, statehood. The Russian people and Orthodoxy have become on the brink of complete destruction and absorption by another civilizational force.
It was the crown of the "road map" of the West, which he carried out against Russia for several centuries. Imperceptible successive steps in undermining religious foundations, changes in public awareness, the introduction of financial and economic structures undermined both the state and centuries-old values, and the way the Russian people lived. For which he paid, very bloody paid.
How did you do it? This question was relevant then, and even more relevant now in the XXI century.
Around treason and deception
The beginning of the 20th century in Russia was marked by a sharp avalanche-like growth of passionate-minded young people, all of whose energy was poured into the struggle against the autocracy. Of course, this phenomenon can be explained by the national factor, when, as a result of the short-sighted accession to the Russian Empire of many lands, especially in the West and Transcaucasia, inhabited by peoples alien to the hostile Russian structure and mentality, the latter began to occupy key positions in society in the humanitarian, financial and economic fields , and more and more noticeable influence on its development.
This phenomenon can be explained by the weakening of religious foundations, when in the reign of Alexander II, contrary to the will of his grandfather, the revived Biblical society from the second attempt (the first was before the Decembrist uprising in 1825) succeeded in dragging the official synodal translation into Russian of the Old Testament based on the Judean Masoretic text X century n. e. (Protestant Bible of King Jacob), and not on the basis of the Greek Septuagint of the III century BC. e., which is used in Orthodox worship. True, the original synodal translation indicated the use of the "parallel texts" from the Septuagint when reading differently. But as time passed, try now to buy a Bible in these bookstores with these “parallel texts” from the Septuagint. They quietly and quietly disappeared from publications. And people who study the Old Testament received and receive knowledge and beliefs distorted by the Masoretic text, faithfully believing that they are studying the real Old Testament.
But, most importantly, how, where and by what methods was this passionate, extremely aggressive and revolutionary youth cultivated?
I want to present you a summary table of the social composition and number of participants in the revolutionary movement for 1870-1879.
Some numbers are amazing:
1. A relatively small percentage of revolutionaries among workers and peasants, 14 and 5%, respectively.
2. 7,6% are teachers and lecturers, and almost 49% are high school students and students.
3. The presence of priests and seminarians in the table shows how deeply revolutionary ideas have penetrated society.
Think about it, 49% are schoolchildren and students and almost 5% are seminarians. But these are children! And what kind of state education system is this, which allowed the “road map” to penetrate into schools, gymnasiums, universities, and even seminaries, raising terrorists and maydanschik from our children?
It was these children who subsequently grew up in the fiery leaders of the next Orange Revolution, initially promising freedom, equality and fraternity to the people, and giving poverty, hunger, and even more enslavement, having distributed all the concessions on the deposits of natural wealth to western corporations. Having promised peace to the peoples, factories for the workers, land for the peasants, and having given the bloodiest civil war and depriving people of everything, even personal property, “socialized” everything, including families and children. In 20-s, no one ever recalled the initial slogans and promises, but severely forced people to a new reality, the reality of a complete lack of rights even for personal property.
The tools of this global robbery were born just in the period of the previous “road map”.
Let me give you another characteristic document.
Report of the Assistant Kiev Police Chief Voronchuk to the Kiev Police Chief 27 August 1913
“The cooperative movement in Russia is now in the hands of revolutionary elements. They are widely promoting the proliferation of cooperative principles, seeking recreate economic life countries into cooperative organizations of all kinds, eliminating as far as possible personal property, to unite these organizations into unions, and to subordinate the latter to the Council of Unions, which will be located in Moscow, to place capital in financial institutions organized according to the same system, and the center of such financial institutions should be the Moscow People's Bank.
If we take into account that this movement is headed by people of the highest strata of society, revolutionary trends and by their social status they have nothing in common with the cooperative business, in terms of their personal interests, it becomes obvious that they decided to use the real legal movement in their revolutionary goals.
Such intensified vigorous propaganda and the desire to widely disseminate cooperative organizations united in unions, and then in the Council of Unions, is undoubtedly the desire to create a state in the state. They, obviously, expect that the conditions of economic life on a cooperative basis, with satisfactory results and with their wide spread, they will educate the people in a democratic system and a negative view on the right of personal property.
Starting with the economic subordination of the masses organized in co-operatives, they will then create the possibility of influencing them politically. I strongly suspect that in the present movement lies a huge coup plan, although, due to the chosen tactics of the approach, it may not come so soon. ”
State: Russian Empire.
Source: Reader on the history of the USSR. 1861 — 1917. M .: Enlightenment, 1990. C. 373-374.
TSGAOR - F. DP 4 Dr., —1908. — D 121, —T. 5. — H. 1. — L. 32 — 33.
Let the supporters of the communist ideology tell me, because the communists never talked about personal property, but only about privately owned. This is a global fraud, quiet and inconspicuous substitution. One of the methods of such a substitution is, as it is now tolerantly called, incorrect translation of K. Marx into Russian with the fundamental substitution of concepts. Unfortunately, this substitution is still working, misleading millions of people who sincerely believe in Marxism.
Personal property и private property - these are completely different things. Under the guise of one, they deprived another of them by making a substitution within the framework of the road map. The recognition and separation of ownership of personal and private legislation occurred only in the Stalinist Constitution of 1936 of the year. Before her, almost 20 years, according to the law, citizens could not have anything. This was one of the reasons that L. Trotsky in his book “Devoted revolution: What is the USSR and where is it going?” wrote that the Stalinist USSR has nothing to do with Marxism.
Yes, the Communists talked about the abolition of private property. But only for external use. In personal correspondence they understood perfectly what they really mean.
“The Jewish people themselves will become their own Messiah. His kingdom over the world will be realized through the unification of other human races, the abolition of monarchies and borders as the basis of isolation (particularismo) and the proclamation of a world republic that everywhere recognizes the rights of Jewish citizenship.
With this new organization of humanity, the children of Israel who are now scattered over the entire surface of the Earth, all of the same race, the same traditional education, without much resistance, will become the leading element everywhere, especially if they can impose Jewish leadership on the working masses. Thus, the victory of the proletariat will transfer into Israeli hands the governments of all nations along with the establishment of the World Republic. Then the governments of the Jewish race will be able to cancel individual property (individual; privada - private, personal - personal; note per) and dispose of the wealth of nations everywhere. Thus, the promise of the Talmud about the coming messianic times is realized, when the Jews will own the property of all the peoples of the earth. "
(From a letter by Baruch Levi to Karl Marx. Salluste, "Les engines secretes du Bolchevisme".)
Note: Baruch Levy talks about individual property, which even Wikipedia refers to personal property and not to private.
And all the time people were talking about private property.
But before that, it was necessary to grow up whole generations of people with altered consciousness, who, obediently, enthusiastically and selflessly, would fulfill the points of the “road map” written for them. In order to find out how this was done, you need to consider this process from the very beginning.
It is believed that the beginning of the modern Judeo-British civilization, within the framework and according to the rules of which the whole world now lives, was laid by the Cromwell revolt in 1645 year. Having created his own army with the money of Sephardic bankers who escaped from Spain to Holland, Cromwell laid the foundation for the current Judeo-Protestant symbiosis, both in the financial and economic, and in the state fields. True, the creation of both the financial and economic system, and the state on which the new civilizational entity could rely, at first strongly stalled. Created at the beginning of the 17 century, the municipal exchange bank of Amsterdam, Wisselbank, which, during the period of rapid enrichment from the slave trade and diamond cutting, replaced many exchange bureaus and unified calculations, choked on its own tulips — financial frauds and bubbles. Therefore, it took a strong state bank that could streamline settlements based on the issue of a new ersatz, a substitute for coins made of precious metals — banknotes and obligations. It was the first state bank, the Bank of England, established in 1690 for the capital of Jewish money changers and jewelers and Protestant nobles, and which finally came under the control of the Rothschilds at the beginning of the XIX century. It was decided to make England the financial center of an emerging civilization, and to make its support a completely new state on another continent - the United States of America.
But the education system in England did not allow the desired rate of civilization change. Remaining somewhat liberal, it allowed education in schools of concessions other than the Anglican Church. The selection system for the necessary financial and industrial capital of young people from the “people” was earned through “genetic selection” thanks to Elizabeth's Law of the Poor . In addition, the emerging new financial and industrial forms came into conflict with the interests of the state in the field of education, and soon the law on compulsory training and apprenticeship of apprentices was abolished by shifting these functions onto the shoulders of the state. The state responded to the financial and industrial oligarchy with the creation of Robert Reicks Sunday schools for poor children, boys and girls who were not genetically suitable for school, and who, according to the “law on the poor”, were waiting for "Work Houses"a little different from imprisonment. The new civilization elite responded to the state with an orthodox movement against the “rakes 'rags schools” (eng. “Raikes' Ragged School”) under the pretext of observing the “Sabbath day” (eng. Sabbatarian disputes). In addition, following its colonial policy, the state of England prevented the formation of a new US state and almost won by 1790 in the year, having laid siege and subsequently taking Charleston.
The first "orange revolution"
And then in England there was the first in the world "orange revolution", the basic methods of which are used until now. The cerebral center of this revolution was a man whose appearance everyone knows perfectly well from the image on the 100-dollar bill. This is a journalist, publisher, diplomat, author of the American Constitution, a Freemason, founder of the Nine Sisters Masonic Lodge and the Leather Apron Club (Juntho), which became the American Philosophical Society in 1743, the members of which from the beginning of 1770- Before the beginning of 1860, 24 of Russian scientists were elected, including T. I. von Klingstet (1773), E. R. Dashkova (1789), P. S. Pallas (1791), F. P. Adelung (1818), I. F. Krusenstern (1824), V. Ya. Struve (1853), First American Member of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences Benjamin Franklin , who was at that time the representative of the US Congress in France.
The Orange Revolution plan in London consisted of two parts.
The first, external, took over the secret agent of the French king in London, a sharpie and a slaver, a famous writer Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais. He created a fictitious company trading house "Rodrigo Ortales and company", acquired for the needs of the "house" forty ships, including the 60-gun brig, received from King Louis XVI million livres and access to French arsenals and put 216 guns to America, 27 mortars, 200 gun barrels, 8 transport ships, 30 thousands of guns, as well as a large number of grenades, a huge amount of gunpowder and military uniforms, sufficient to equip twenty-five thousand people. Immediately following this, 4 July 1776, the 13 representatives of the rebel colonies gathered in Philadelphia declared the independence of the United States of America in their Declaration. However, this aid to France did not save her from the second “Orange Revolution”, which began on July 14. 1789, the capture of Bastille, which became a bit more bloody than London.
But since even such assistance turned out to be insufficient to achieve the full independence of the United States, the second part of the Orange Revolution came into effect directly in London. She was led by a Mason, a Scottish aristocrat. Lord George Gordon. The true aims of the insurgency were disguised as others. It was decided to play the religious factor and, using it as a sign, to achieve not just the withdrawal of British troops from America, a change in the leadership of England, but also to make it the main ally of the United States for all times. The Union of Protestants was created in London, protesting against Catholic discrimination against Catholics from the last 16th century Catholic queen, Maria Bloody XVI century, in London, committing bloody lawlessness (worse than Maidan) in London.
The events of the first “Orange Revolution” are rarely mentioned in history and are known to the public thanks to the English historians R. Black and H. Butterfield, and above all the famous novel by C. Dickens “Barneby Raj”.
The scenario of the Orange Revolution in London was no different from the scenarios of all subsequent revolutions. First, the collection of signatures on a petition calling for parliament to restore the repealed law, then many speakers who talked about the atrocities of the “papists” 250 years ago, the organization of the Committee of Plenipotentiaries, coordinating the entire campaign. Then, the organization of mass rallies at which the tyrant was blamed for the king, the fallen parliament and the criminal government (“panda is out!”), The distribution of millions of leaflets and pamphlets with anti-Catholic appeals and, finally, the Union of Protestants issued an “Appeal to the people of Great Britain”. It proclaimed the goal:
“To hinder any efforts aimed at promoting the papacy, stopping the destruction of the state, the destruction of the church, the establishment of double slavery, forging chains for the bodies and minds of the British ...
To be tolerant of the papacy is to contribute to the destruction of existing souls, and the millions of other souls who do not exist at the present time, but whose existence is destined by God. This is a direct way to summon the revenge of a holy and jealous God and bring about the destruction of our fleets and armies, as well as the destruction of oneself and one's posterity. To tolerate such views is to insult the moral perfection of God, who gave us reason and immortality, it is to encourage the practice of idolatry in a Christian country. ”
But the true purpose of Lord Gordon voiced in Parliament - the withdrawal of British troops from the North American colonies. After receiving a refusal in parliament and the ardent speech of Lord Gordon, in which he said that “The king's throne speech is full of absurdity and completely devoid of common sense ... The concessions to the papists disturbed the whole country, and the people are determined to protect themselves from those people who have become favorites of the government. I not only express my feelings here. The government will find that there are 120 thousands of people behind my back! People expressed their feelings in resolutions and press. ”, the active phase of the "revolution" began.
The protesters with a petition that gathered 100 thousands of signatures, four detachments under the coordination of people with blue flags on the roofs of buildings, moved to parliament, where they were subjected to physical influence, insults, kicks and tweaks, not only members of the House of Commons, but also bishops. Protesters broke into parliament and took seats at the door to the hall. The guards and the cavalrymen who came to the rescue did not dare to shoot at the people. The protesters threatened not to let anyone out until the law they needed was passed. But Parliament postponed the hearing, and by midnight the rebels left the building. In London, mass arson, pogroms and robberies began, mostly of Catholic buildings and dwellings.
After 4 of the day, the parliament rejected the demands of the protesters and the storming of administrative buildings and Newgate prison began in London. London plunged into bloody chaos. Minister Walpole called June 7 “Black Wednesday ... For six hours in a row I was sure that half of the city would turn into ashes and ashes”
But the Archbishop of York wrote: “Not a single crowd acted without a certain number of well-dressed people who led them.”
The crowd expectedly moved to capture the Bank of England, the Tower and the City. And only the arrival in London of large military units, loyal to the king and the government, made it possible to suppress the insurrection through 3 of the day. According to official figures, 285 people were killed and died from injuries. 135 was arrested. Of those arrested, 59 were convicted, while 21 was executed.
Information about the true organizers of the Orange Revolution is extremely scarce. Judge L. Barrington wrote on June 12: “It is said that in most cases there were few rebels. This is true, but not the whole truth. The most active were the guys prepared by the people of Dr. Franklin for the devilish practice of arson. ”
Although the Orange Revolution was officially defeated, the further course of events suggests otherwise. Lord Gordon was released from the Tower six months later due to the lack of evidence of charges, British troops eventually left the United States, and the Great Britain-United States Duumvirate later became the basis of Judeo-British civilization for centuries.
The London Orange Revolution also showed the strengths and weaknesses of this technology, which were already taken into account after 9 years in Paris.
Efficiency has been proven:
- mass propaganda through the press and rallies, the possibility of using it to manipulate the mass consciousness and actions, to change in a timely manner in a changing environment;
- the interpretation of history and its use for the excitation of the masses;
- involvement of mentally ill and unbalanced people, criminals and outcasts into the process;
- manage virtually online political processes, tactics, timely change of slogans and slogans;
- the use of certain colors to identify "their" and "alien";
- crowd control with the help of some means (flags) from tall buildings;
- the use of battle cries and music, and much more.
We can observe all these methods in any “orange revolution” of modernity. And Gene Sharp's books on color revolutions are not new. All this has long been and has long been tested in practice.
The London Revolution also revealed one necessary condition - the education and training of both the masses of the people and its leaders at any level. And this is only possible by a long way of education through the education system. Therefore, in the XIX century, the education systems of all Western countries began to undergo rapid and radical reforms. This process concerned the Russian Empire.
To be continued ...