Military Review

Trail lost, deflection counted?

47
US intelligence did not find evidence of Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the 9 / 11 terrorist attacks. This was announced by John Brennan himself, who heads the Central Intelligence Agency. He specifically gave an interview to Al-Arabiya (exclusive). Undoubtedly, the statement was made with the filing of B.H. Obama, known for his reverent attitude to the allied kingdom.

Recall, the US congressmen suspected Saudi Arabia of supporting the militants who organized the September 11 2001 attacks. The US Senate recently adopted a document called “Justice Against the Sponsors of Terrorism”. The act could allow victims of attacks and relatives of the victims to sue the US courts against the government of Saudi Arabia.

Most of the commission's report on the September 11 attacks of 2001, prepared in the US by a bipartisan commission, was published as early as 2003. The voluminous text (eight hundred pages) was laid out in open access, with the exception of one chapter in the 28 pages. It was classified out of the so-called national security considerations. Some congressmen believed that the Bush administration simply did not want to spoil relations with the Saudis. The 28 pages were indeed classified by order of George W. Bush himself - supposedly, allegedly because it mentioned the likely role of Saudi Arabia, the strategic partner of the United States, in the attacks. After all, it is widely known that out of nineteen terrorists, fifteen people were subjects of Saudi Arabia.

In April, 2016 published a statement by two influential people in the American press: New York State Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and former Senator Bob Graham. Both claimed that the Saudis had "sponsored" the 9 / 11 attacks.

Mr. Graham during the Bush presidency was part of the commission of inquiry into the attacks. He told the press that the classified 28-page chapter contains information about the involvement of Riyadh in terrorist attacks. According to Graham, when future terrorists flew to the US, they did not even know English and did not have flight experience. The Saudi, the “agent” Omar al-Bayoumi, also issued money for the flight school to the militants.

This information was later confirmed by former Congressman Tim Remer and former Senator Bob Kerry.

The Saudi authorities completely deny any involvement in terrorist attacks in the United States. In addition, the US commission of inquiry did not reveal specific facts about the involvement of senior Saudi officials either in the organization or in the financing of the attacks.

The Obama administration in April initiated talks with congressmen opposed to the Saudis and tried to convince them of the need to reject the bill mentioned above. However, in May, the senators approved the bill. However, this does not mean that he became law.

The Saudis had previously threatened to sell off US-owned US financial assets worth about $ 750 billion, while Obama said he would veto the document.

However, this bill, as we have already written on VO, was welcomed both by a number of well-known parliamentarians and by the families of victims of the 9 / 11 attacks. These people believe that the B. H. Obama administration supports Riyadh. "It is surprising that our government supports the Saudis against their own citizens," the newspaper said. "Vedomosti" words of Mindy Kleinberg, whose husband died in the World Trade Center.

The other day, in June 2016, a powerful force joined the game about the "Saudi track" on the side of Obama - the CIA.

Trail lost, deflection counted?


12 June on the English language website of the channel Al-Arabia There was a retelling of an exclusive interview given by CIA Director John Brennan to the Washington bureau Al Arabiya News.

According to Mr. Brennan, “no evidence” of the Saudi government’s involvement in the 9 / 11 attacks was discovered.

The director of the CIA made its statements in the context of an assessment of the 28-page report by congressmen who claimed that Saudi officials were somehow involved in the attacks.

Al Arabiya News recalls that in May 2016, Mr. John Lehman, a member of the commission for the investigation of the 11 attacks on September 2001, told CNN television that there was evidence that six Saudi authorities had supported Al -Kaidu.

However, Mr. Brennan (by the way, this man gave an interview to the Arab media for the first time) does not agree with such accusations.

The commission investigating the 11 attacks of September 2001 of the year did its job “very carefully,” the main man in the CIA said. The conclusion of the commission members about the possible involvement of the Saudi government in the terrorist attacks was as follows: there is no evidence that “the Saudi government as an institution or Saudi senior officials individually” supported the ideas of attacks in the USA on September 11 of 2001.

In addition, the director of the CIA approved the upcoming publication of 28 pages, previously classified.

According to experts who led Brennan, the attacks were organized by Al-Qaeda, led by Ayman al-Zawahiri. The head of the CIA also said that over the past fifteen years, the Saudis have taken a worthy place among the best partners of the United States "in the fight against terrorism." According to Mr. Brennan, the king of Saudi Arabia, Salman and his deputy, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, are "strong partners in this fight against terrorism."

If Mr. Senators, we add, not to mention the relatives of those who died in September 2001, can relate to the “Saudi trail” with anger and pain, then Mr. President and his subordinates like Brennan will not spoil their relations with the Saudis . Moreover, they will do everything to improve them.

Barack Obama and his administration are often blamed for failures in the Middle East: they say they have blundered with Syria, relations with Saudi Arabia have worsened, and the appearance of the “IG” blinked out, and allowed the Russians to go to war, and Iran gave too many concessions. In short, sheer failures, sheer political weakness. Israelis are unhappy with Obama’s behavior, and Arabs are often visited by Putin. This suggests that "Great America" ​​is already almost on the sidelines in the Middle East. True, it is not clear who is there first, and whether it is at all.

And if Mr. Obama finally quarrels with the Saudis, with whom relations at the White House are now very strained, he will become that very president, about whom in textbooks stories They will write: in its era, the Middle East has gone out of American control. And this means nothing more than the beginning of the end of the world American “hegemony”.

That is why the main tseerushnik Mr. Brennan lost track. Now we have to wait for the Saudi response. We must, in Riyadh, count the deflection of Washington!

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
47 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 15 June 2016 05: 12
    +5
    The trace is lost. Still would. Arabs sprinkled with pepper (lard), so we were brewed.
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 15 June 2016 06: 10
      +4
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      The trace is lost. Still would. Arabs sprinkled with pepper (lard), so we were brewed.

      Sorry, Instead of "us" read "nose".
      1. _Vladislav_
        _Vladislav_ 15 June 2016 09: 18
        +14
        In Saudi Arabia there was no trace.
        11 September, the event is fully and completely organized by the then ruling elite of the United States. No, of course, they could pull up performers from the CA, but the event itself, physical (and even theoretical) could not, well, never take place without a resolution of the USA itself.
        They needed a sacred sacrifice. And so sacred to go where they want, and so that no one doubts the correctness of their actions.

        And okay once. But the airspace was violated as many as four times.
        1) North Tower
        2) South Tower
        3) Pentagon (although there was no plane there, and the Kyrgyz Republic is another piece of evidence against the United States, but now is not about that)
        4) The White House - yes, the plane did not fly there. Allegedly the passengers rebelled and the liner crashed. Well, let them be passengers - but where were the military?

        So there are more questions than answers.
        PS
        And why did the third skyscraper collapse into which no plane crashed. And collapsed quite jewelry and filigree.

        But once, when the time comes, the world will know the truth. When the signature stamp is removed from this event.
        1. ruAlex
          ruAlex 15 June 2016 10: 31
          +3
          I agree . Watch the movie "Fahrenheit 911" which is banned in the states.
          1. Reserve officer
            Reserve officer 15 June 2016 13: 01
            +2
            "... Chief CER Mr. Brennan has lost track."

            Of course I did. How will he look for his own trail?
          2. gladcu2
            gladcu2 15 June 2016 14: 43
            +2
            ruAlex

            This movie is not banned in the USA. Moreover, in the USA it is made. This film is already 10 years old. Views are tens of millions.

            What Vladislav wrote is not a sensation.

            You understand that the official version is just tolerant.

            On the street of New York there was a placard in the place of the last destroyed house where they showed a part of this film.
  2. evil partisan
    evil partisan 15 June 2016 05: 24
    +3
    To steal this Brenon and to squeeze his eggs in a vice would tell a lot of interesting things ... winked
  3. Denis DV
    Denis DV 15 June 2016 05: 25
    +7
    And what, Yevgeny Yanovich thinks about this?
    laughing
    1. bazalt16
      bazalt16 15 June 2016 07: 02
      -9
      Evgeny Yanovich Shaitanovsky needs to look for traces of September 11 in Tel Aviv. And not mumble a "hackneyed record" about Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
  4. Knowing
    Knowing 15 June 2016 05: 26
    +8
    Well, they will blame Russia on taperech, since Ayman al-Zawahiri visited Russia in 1996, although in Chechnya, but we know that we are all being zombified ... laughing
    ... Alexander Litvinenko and Boris Berezovsky claimed that during his then visit to Russia, az-Zawahiri underwent six-month training in the territory of Dagestan under the guidance of Russian state security officers ...
    1. Iskander Sh
      Iskander Sh 15 June 2016 17: 35
      +1
      Why should the US blame anyone, because you can always shake the innocent?

      New York Federal District Judge George Daniels on Wednesday delivered a judgment in absentia, according to which Iran must pay $ 7,5 billion relatives and other representatives of those killed in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The judge determined that the Iranian authoritiesmust pay another three billion to insurerscovering property damage and other material losses.
      Judge Daniels previously ruled that Tehran could not prove its innocence to assist the organizers of the attack, in connection with which Iranian authorities share responsibility for damage caused during it
  5. crasever
    crasever 15 June 2016 05: 38
    +7
    Well, let the Saudis not be guilty on September 11th. But what about betraying the ideals of freedom and progress, the Amer’s ruling circles, which do not contribute to the arrival of Saudi Arabia, universal values, democracy there, etc. ??
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 15 June 2016 08: 58
      +3
      Quote: crasever
      Well, let the Saudis not be guilty on September 11th. But what about betraying the ideals of freedom and progress, the Amer’s ruling circles, which do not contribute to the arrival of Saudi Arabia, universal values, democracy there, etc. ??

      Yes, there is no "betrayal of ideals" - these values ​​are nothing more than propaganda noodles for the ears of the fooled, the only ideal that is worshiped behind a puddle is $ as an opportunity to rob and deceive the whole world.
      1. oblako
        oblako 15 June 2016 12: 33
        0
        The matter has long been not in who did what, but in what the world media will say about this. And if they belong to those who do, they will say what they need, and not how it really was. The costs of the capitalist system and the concentration of capital ...
    2. Razvedka_Boem
      Razvedka_Boem 15 June 2016 17: 10
      0
      Salvage still rules the world .. Therefore, the fact that in Saudi Arabia, a woman who drives a car is chopped off, and her husband is stoned for treason, they do not pay attention .. After all, she is an ally and partner of the United States.
      By the way, not so long ago, one of "these" - issued a fatwa, which says that in case of hunger, the husband can eat his wife .. This is not a joke.
      And it is precisely such things that do everyone (after all, a fly in the ointment, a barrel of honey spoils) the Muslims, in the eyes of others by some nonhumans.
      Saudis snickered. And they will be asked from them in full.
      1. Iskander Sh
        Iskander Sh 15 June 2016 17: 27
        0
        Quote: Razvedka_Boem
        in case of hunger, the husband can eat his wife.



        [Not a lot of racism] And did you expect a doll reaction from Obama? laughing
  6. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 15 June 2016 05: 41
    +5
    I would not be surprised if it was even cooler that the US itself was behind the Saudis who paid for September 11th as the customer, it was beneficial for both of them to "dump" Libya and Iraq from the oil market, and take Afghanistan's drugs under control, or rather under the "roof". And September 11 is a good reason to start at least a nuclear war, and the Saudis, when trying to surrender them, threatened to expose, and the rest is tinsel and bluff.
  7. Antiprogressor
    Antiprogressor 15 June 2016 05: 49
    +6
    If the US says "white," then it means Black. And it is difficult to imagine a more representative person from the United States than the CIA director. But you can. This is the director of national intelligence (or, more correctly, the intelligence community) James ... No, not Bond, not Moriarty, but Klapper! World champion in plane crashes and terrorist attacks, wiretapping of everyone on the planet and outside it, in control of your money transactions and much, much ... This man is many times more powerful than any Obama. This is the real professor Moriarty of the 20-21 centuries.
  8. 34 region
    34 region 15 June 2016 06: 06
    +8
    Potapov! 05.41. And what! Believable version. Some organize, others finance. Division of labor. No wonder they probably call the Saudis partners. Counterterrorism Partners In general, terrorists are also their partners. No one is fighting against them. What to say? Well done Americans! Find a reason, organize, get a profit. HAPPY affected? How did they get hurt? The regimes and economies of the Arab countries collapsed. Who suffered from this? USA? Refugees rushed to Europe. Is the US suffering from this? The price of no oil has fallen. Slates are unprofitable. Because of this, they have a crisis?
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 15 June 2016 09: 01
      +2
      Quote: 34 region
      Potapov! 05.41. And what! Believable version. Some organize, others finance.

      If you haven't, I highly recommend watching Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11. The film had problems with distribution in the United States, which did not prevent it from receiving the Palme d'Or at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival. In 2009, The Daily Telegraph named this film “the best film of the XNUMXst century”. There is also about the ties of the Bush family with the bin Laden family.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Фаренгейт_9/11
  9. Stariknv
    Stariknv 15 June 2016 06: 38
    +5
    The trail of the 9/11 attack should be sought by those who were profitable. After the terrorist attack, the United States unleashed a war in the Middle East, so the answer is obvious.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 15 June 2016 07: 08
      +6
      Quote: StarikNV
      The trail of the 9/11 attack should be sought by those who were profitable. After the terrorist attack, the United States unleashed a war in the Middle East, so the answer is obvious.

      More than obvious! Muammar Gaddafi himself provoked this war! Do not rush to protest. The fact is that Gaddafi offered to sell oil at the "Golden Dinars", and this posed a mortal threat to the US dollar. In fact, if the Arab countries accepted this offer, the economy The United States was completely falling apart, as the green candy wrappers became unnecessary. http://gold.ru/news/zolotoj-dinar-kaddafi.html
      http://stringer-news.com/publication.mhtml?Part=50&PubID=37365 Это ссылки,чтобы не посчитали,что это просто придумано.
      1. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 15 June 2016 08: 13
        +2
        It may be a dinar, as one of the reasons, but another reason still looks much more convincing - because of the water.
        http://topwar.ru/7735-grandioznyy-vodnyy-proekt-kaddafi.html
        Libya's own water project was a slap in the face of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the whole west!
        http://marsel-izkazani.livejournal.com/328480.html
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 15 June 2016 13: 52
          0
          Quote: Volzhanin
          Libya's own water project was a slap in the face of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the whole west!

          Water is now becoming an expensive commodity. Your assumption is not unfounded and may be one of the reasons for the mess that is happening in the Middle East. So that this mess is organized by the United States and Saudi Arabia, there are no doubts and reasons there may be several. Refusal from the dollar in the oil trade , water resources, Iranian problem. Here are the reasons why this provocation was needed to unleash a war on the BV.
      2. Cube123
        Cube123 15 June 2016 09: 10
        +3
        Quote: Amurets
        Quote: StarikNV
        The trail of the 9/11 attack should be sought by those who were profitable. After the terrorist attack, the United States unleashed a war in the Middle East, so the answer is obvious.

        More than obvious! Muammar Gaddafi himself provoked this war! Do not rush to protest. The fact is that Gaddafi offered to sell oil at the "Golden Dinars", and this posed a mortal threat to the US dollar. In fact, if the Arab countries accepted this offer, the economy The United States was completely falling apart, as the green candy wrappers became unnecessary. http://gold.ru/news/zolotoj-dinar-kaddafi.html
        http://stringer-news.com/publication.mhtml?Part=50&PubID=37365 Это ссылки,чтобы не посчитали,что это просто придумано.

        The error is only in the first and last name. Provoked a war Saddam Hussein.
        In 2000, he stated that Iraq had decided to sell oil for euros, not dollars.
        http://www.nomad.su/?a=18-200306260020

        2003 Article
        http://stringer-news.com/Publication.mhtml?PubID=2134&Part=39

        Gaddafi also suffered, as you wrote, only it was much later. But Hussein made his statement just before 9/11, which was the reason for the US invasion of Iraq. And that is precisely why hostilities began there, although Iraq officially did not "stand by" since 9/11.
  10. koksalek
    koksalek 15 June 2016 06: 52
    +3
    I would also not chop the branch on which I sit, it hurts to fall. So sit yourself whistling about democracy
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 15 June 2016 07: 23
    +6
    Around the 9/11 attacks, it’s so trodden, so trodden, but who will notice its traces. Yes, and the terrorist attacks were made with a purely Hollywood scale ... And things continue to develop like in an action movie ...
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 June 2016 07: 40
    +3
    American intelligence not found evidence of Saudi involvement in the 9/11 terrorist attacks

    It would be surprising if evidence suddenly emerged. And so everything goes according to the American plan. Obama, out of his stupidity, almost fell out with the Saudis, now others are rectifying the situation. Money rules the Western world. "Hand washes hand."
  13. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 15 June 2016 07: 47
    +3
    In general, the truth in these events is to look like a black cat in a dark room. The situation is so confused that any version can be considered far-fetched. They can of course publish these 28 pages, but who said that without cuts and edits. In my opinion, the World is unlikely to recognize the truth, it is not beneficial to the States in the first place.
  14. L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 15 June 2016 07: 47
    +2
    "Nothing personal, just business."
  15. Delink
    Delink 15 June 2016 07: 56
    +3
    Yes, their bending machine works at 100%.
    Somewhere they give gingerbread cookies, someone rolls their own rolls.
  16. Ros 56
    Ros 56 15 June 2016 08: 03
    +1
    They like striped wriggles when they are squeezed like the Saudis. And they will agree with everything when it will be profitable for them. Absolute unscrupulousness at the slightest smell of profit or at the onset of impending responsibility for their lawlessness.
  17. Antiprogressor
    Antiprogressor 15 June 2016 08: 06
    +2
    Quote: StarikNV
    The trail of the 9/11 attack should be sought by those who were profitable. US after the attack unleashed a war in the Middle East, so the answer is obvious

    After the terrorist attack, the structure of the Director of National Intelligence was created through the Intelligence Reform and Counterterrorism Act. This opened up the immeasurable right (lack of rights) of the authorities to do whatever they want, under the guise of fighting terrorism. Those. You are walking in the city of St. Pererburg, they pshikate something in your face, and you woke up in Guantanamo in Cuba ... "suddenly a whistle, they grab me, call me a hooligan, and one recognized, shouts:" r-repeat offender!
    Or you live quietly and calmly, and you are suddenly fired without explanation. But there are reasons! You said on the phone several times a week ... and mentioned twice ... Or closed your bank account, because ... someone didn’t like something ...
    This operation was carried out as an occasion for many cases. More for globalization of processes in the financial and social spheres. That is - to subjugate and control all of humanity.
  18. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 15 June 2016 08: 08
    +1
    Striped savages do not know at all what image and reputation are. What they want is traded, then traded the opposite, and their wild people still hawala, because nothing to think, they only eat in the head. And it's all over the world!
    laughing
  19. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 15 June 2016 08: 12
    +3
    The United States cannot surrender Saudi Arabia
    - so in the wake you can go to the true organizer of the 9.11 attacks, which is located in the USA:
    1) The towers collapsed as in the technical preparations for the demolition, everyone saw it,
    2) and this attack was needed for those who really steers US policy - for intervention in the region, justification was needed,
    3) And to carry out technical preparations for the destruction of the towers without the knowledge of the special services is hardly possible.
    4) If the SA and is involved in these attacks, it is only with the filing of the United States.
    Press the Saudis, the CIA will come out.
  20. Sars
    Sars 15 June 2016 08: 47
    +2
    And where did the Saudis get a Boeing with cardboard wings and wooden engines on which the Pentagon attacked? Who remembers, after the terrorist attack in the Pentagon building there was such a small hole (which the Boeing would have difficulty penetrating), without traces of the tail, wings and engines !!!

    And no one heard what happened with the crash of our plane at the Rostov airport, everything quickly died out, then the photos from the accident in Kazan were published in the media, and in those photos that were from Rostov there is not a single large part of the plane - only pieces of things ? It was accepted after such an accident to completely assemble the airplane’s hull from the wreckage, and then the IAC and other competent authorities took water into their mouths.
  21. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 15 June 2016 09: 12
    0
    Yes, how much can you lick well .. these Saudis? Either the United States caved in, then Ban Ki-moon ... wassat
  22. antiexpert
    antiexpert 15 June 2016 09: 55
    +2
    in any court, the defendant's lawyer will ask a simple question to which the United States will not be able to answer: "why did the third skyscraper fall, after all, the plane did not fly into it?"
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 15 June 2016 11: 59
      +3
      Quote: antiexpert
      in any court, the defendant's lawyer will ask a simple question to which the United States will not be able to answer: "why did the third skyscraper fall, after all, the plane did not fly into it?"

      "The official story was a series of gas explosions and the ensuing fire. However, this is a lie. At 17:00 New York time, the BBC broadcasted live from the scene. The whole world watched. as presenter Jane Standley began to tell the audience about the collapse of the third building (WTC 7).

      The building was still intact. After all, before the collapse of the building there was still another 20 minutes! But the signature at the bottom of the screen said: "The 47-story Salomon Brothers building near the World Trade Center also collapsed."

      When the presenter was told that she was bloated, the girl turned to the picture, blushed and began to lament: “Litter!”. At 17:14, the picture of the broadcast from New York suddenly gave way to interference and disappeared from the air.

      Obviously, the BBC television crew worked and scripted. The head of the news department, Richard Porter, of course, did not admit: “We are not part of the conspiracy. No one told us what to tell and what to do on September 11th. Nobody informed us in advance that the building should fall. We did not receive a press release or a scenario of the events that should happen. ”

      But the trouble is, “we did not have the original recording of the September 11 reports - but not because of a conspiracy, but because of confusion," Porter admitted, despite the fact that the "confusion" was in New York, not in London. "



      http://www.prezidentpress.ru/news/3416-godovschina-provokacii-11-sentyabrya-snos
      -vethih-zdaniy-kak-terakt.html
  23. Stas57
    Stas57 15 June 2016 10: 07
    0
    US intelligence did not find evidence of Saudi involvement in the 9 / 11 terrorist attacks. This was announced by John Brennan himself, who heads the Central Intelligence Agency.

    well, okay, you just have to wait for the final decay and them @ Gorby @
  24. azer
    azer 15 June 2016 10: 23
    +1
    Deflection counted for 1 trillion bucks invested in the US economy
  25. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 15 June 2016 11: 01
    +1
    Quote: _Vladislav_
    In Saudi Arabia there was no trace.
    11 September, the event is fully and completely organized by the then ruling elite of the United States. No, of course, they could pull up performers from the CA, but the event itself, physical (and even theoretical) could not, well, never take place without a resolution of the USA itself.
    They needed a sacred sacrifice. And so sacred to go where they want, and so that no one doubts the correctness of their actions.

    And okay once. But the airspace was violated as many as four times.
    1) North Tower
    2) South Tower
    3) Pentagon (although there was no plane there, and the Kyrgyz Republic is another piece of evidence against the United States, but now is not about that)
    4) The White House - yes, the plane did not fly there. Allegedly the passengers rebelled and the liner crashed. Well, let them be passengers - but where were the military?

    So there are more questions than answers.
    PS
    And why did the third skyscraper collapse into which no plane crashed. And collapsed quite jewelry and filigree.

    But once, when the time comes, the world will know the truth. When the signature stamp is removed from this event.

    Anyone have any questions? To whom? To those who don’t put people's lives in anything? Come on. We have answers, not questions.
    Deflection. Let them even bend down in front of each other.
  26. Lelek
    Lelek 15 June 2016 11: 21
    +2
    (Saudis had previously threatened to sell about $ 750 billion worth of U.S. financial assets to the kingdom, and Obama said he would veto the document.)

    Find at least one difference from the behavior of Kiev in relation to the debt of the Russian Federation (except in numbers = 3 lard and 750 lard).
    Waltzman has a good teacher, and Waltzman himself is a worthy student of the goat-bearded Sam.
  27. Ozhogin Dmitry
    Ozhogin Dmitry 15 June 2016 12: 15
    +1
    And on September 11, not a single Jew from 7 Israeli companies died. All, as one, "late". Strange, isn't it?
  28. Berkut24
    Berkut24 15 June 2016 12: 30
    +2
    I would not like to write rude words, but there is no synonym. In general, in hegemon the testes were far from non-steel. And the farther, the longer the line will grow with a vice and pliers.
  29. Enoch
    Enoch 15 June 2016 13: 41
    0
    The Masonic script is being finalized on the fly, "people gossip" as they say.
  30. Starik72
    Starik72 15 June 2016 14: 04
    +1
    No matter how they wrote and discussed this bloody and terrible event, for me watching this bloody event on TV live, there is clearly one thing, the US top executive and the CIA chief perpetrator are to blame. This is confirmed by the investigation of French experts and our Russians. Investigations were covered in the media.
  31. kukan913
    kukan913 15 June 2016 15: 54
    0
    Was there a boy? That’s the question, they muddied the ends so you can’t see, but as they say ends in the water
  32. kig
    kig 15 June 2016 19: 57
    0
    Most likely, the CIA director’s statement only states that the States are trying to restore shaky relations with the Saudis. In, and nothing more.