The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the September 11 attacks

12 2016 June 67

The commission of inquiry did not find evidence of the involvement of Saudi Arabia in the September 11 terrorist attacks of 2001 r in New York, reports RIA News Statement by CIA Director John Brennan.

The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the September 11 attacks

Earlier, American publications reported that "the report of the commission of inquiry into the terrorist attacks, published in 2002, contains 28 secret pages, in which we are talking about the support of terrorists in Saudi Arabia who launched the 11 attacks of 2001 September."

Later, the White House said that the report contained preliminary conclusions that did not contain reliable facts. What is actually said in the secret part of the report is not known, since so far it has not been made public.

“After the September 11 attacks, the commission scrutinized these allegations about the involvement of Saudi Arabia. They (the commission) concluded that there was no evidence that indicated that the Saudi government as an institution and Saudi high-ranking officials had personally supported the September 11 attacks, ”

said the CIA chief.

“In fact, studies have shown that, unfortunately, these attacks occurred, but this was the work of Al-Qaida, (Al-Qaida’s leader, Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and others like him,” added Brennan, noting that "Over the past 15 years, Saudi Arabia has become one of the best partners of the United States in the fight against terrorism. ”.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

x.andvlad

+9

12 June 2016 11: 32

Indeed, why lose such an influential ally in the Middle East? Terrorist attacks are a thing of the past. And for the good of the case, all the details of the investigations can be classified as 100 years old.
1. Grandson of Veteran
  
  +6
  
  12 June 2016 11: 41
  
  “In fact, the studies carried out showed that, unfortunately, these attacks took place, but it was the work of al-Qaeda, (al-Qaeda leader Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and others like him,” Brennan added.
  
  They ss..t in galaza, and they are God's dew ....
  1. marl
    
    +5
    
    12 June 2016 12: 14
    
    Quote: Veteran's grandson
    "In fact, the studies carried out showed that, unfortunately, these attacks took place, but it was the work of Al-Qaeda, (Al-Qaeda leader Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and others like him."
    
    Understood ...
    And why didn’t they find the trail of the Kremlin, have you guessed it yet? ...
    1. cniza
      
      +9
      
      12 June 2016 12: 36
      
      But sooner or later the truth will come up and then everyone will see the ears of the CIA for all the deeds.
      1. Tatyana
        
        +4
        
        12 June 2016 13: 48
        
        The commission of inquiry did not find evidence of the involvement of Saudi Arabia in the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in New York, RIA Novosti reported the statement by CIA Director John Brennan.
        
        Yes, few have doubted this before!
        
        The CIA blew it all up! It was a political sabotage by the US State Department so that the US had a reason to really legalize its presence with its weapons and troops in the BV, ostensibly to fight against Arab terrorists and against the creation of ISIS. But in fact, to take the oil BV under its tight control, a little squeezing Saudi Arabia, which has become self-confident.
        
        just exp
        
        +1
        
        12 June 2016 16: 48
        
        that's why they said that the Saudis were not involved, because then they would say by whose order they did it.
        and besides that, the Saudis immediately merge state securities into 750 lard, which is even worse in the process.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. poquello
      
      +1
      
      12 June 2016 12: 40
      
      Quote: marna
      Understood ...
      And why didn’t they find the trail of the Kremlin, have you guessed it yet? ...
      
      not well it's generally super
      Brennan, noting that "over the past 15 years, Saudi Arabia has become one of the best partners of the United States in the fight against terrorism."
    4. Observer2014
      
      +1
      
      12 June 2016 14: 40
      
      marl
      And why didn’t they find the trail of the Kremlin, have you guessed it yet? ...
      
      So at that time, Putin and Russia were not seriously put at all. The truth is, there is one thing. If now they will try to create a remake with a "Russian trace". Will run into a closer investigation. than to blame the Afghan "highly educated spooks." By the way, the staff with Oswald tried to fulfill the USSR's trace. But there "something went wrong." All the same, the USSR and now Russia have proposals to the United States that they cannot refuse
2. Finches
  
  +8
  
  12 June 2016 11: 53
  
  The American Commission of Inquiry is the most professional, honest and principled commission in the world ... for washing our eyes! They still hide the answer - who killed Kennedy, and then only 15 years have passed - not to stir up trouble ...
3. SveTok
  
  +5
  
  12 June 2016 12: 16
  
  Why make excuses and so it is clear that on September 11 the CIA conducted a large-scale operation together with the Saudis to destabilize the situation in the World and unfortunately they won’t stop there.
  1. Sid.74
    
    +1
    
    12 June 2016 12: 38
    
    Of course, the SA is absolutely not to blame ... it’s obvious ... it was the CIA and the US government that organized the terrorist act in the World Trade Center ... camel drivers certainly have a lot of money ... but they will still be camel drivers.
    
    Osama bin Laden's sons have accused the United States of "arbitrary murder" of their father. The sons' statement to the New York Times said the family wanted to know why the al-Qaeda chief was not captured alive.
    
    And the folder for that? It's a shame you should be, comrade Yankees ... they took their own worm ... wow ... wow ... it's not good.
    
    The United States has shown willingness to promote the release of 20 close relatives of Osama bin Ladenunder house arrest in Iran and expressed their willingness to accept them on their land ...
    
    But the son is already in Europe
    Omar bin Laden, the 26-year-old son of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, with his wife Jane Felix-Brown before aired on Italian television in 2008.
    
    Do you still believe that the twin towers were destroyed by an elderly terrorist from a cave in Afghanistan?
  2. poquello
    
    +2
    
    12 June 2016 12: 42
    
    Quote: SveTok
    Why make excuses and so it is clear that on September 11 the CIA conducted a large-scale operation together with the Saudis to destabilize the situation in the World and unfortunately they won’t stop there.
    
    The towers banged in order to fight terrorism, then everything is logical.
    1. Baloo
      
      0
      
      14 June 2016 08: 18
      
      Demolished towers, overhaul of which was more expensive than insurance payments, movements on the stock exchange before and after. A few weeks before the demolition, the towers were resold and insured for 3 lard in twenty companies during the day. The script itself was developed in the 90s by the German branch of the Tsrules as hypothetical. 6 weeks before the demolition, the analyst submitted to the compass an analytical report, in which, among the 7 possible targets for the terrorist attack, towers were named. The report of authority went down to the clerk, who put it under the cloth, went on vacation. After the vacation, he quit and became the head of the tower security. I remember how on TV the translator said: a message came about the death of the head of the tower guard.
      Well, everyone already knows about "electricians".
      Of course, this is a conspiracy. Large-scale terrorist terrorist operation as a reason for the invasion, on the instructions of the powerful crocodiles.
      Where did the FBI female agent who reported to superiors about strange Arabs who refused to learn to land a plane disappear? Journalists never awarded her a prize of 50 thousand bucks. Who helped register terrorists who were stopped by a computer on face control? There are many questions, no answers.
  3. basalt16
    
    0
    
    12 June 2016 22: 19
    
    Israel is still there
  4. m077ea
    
    0
    
    13 June 2016 09: 54
    
    I didn’t know about the participation of the Saudis in this matter)) I thought the CIA alone managed))) and here it is))))
4. Blondy
  
  0
  
  12 June 2016 14: 58
  
  The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the September 11 attacks
  
  Who cares about the truth - the main expediency.
Alexander Romanov

+7

12 June 2016 11: 34

but it was the work of al-Qaeda, (al-Qaeda leader Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and the like
Stop, Bin Laden has nothing to do with it?
1. Pereira
  
  +8
  
  12 June 2016 11: 40
  
  It turns out, yes.
  It turns out that he was killed for nothing.
  Marvelous are your deeds, Lord!
  1. Alexander Romanov
    
    +4
    
    12 June 2016 11: 44
    
    Quote: Pereira
    It turns out that he was killed for nothing.
    
    It is necessary to rehabilitate, to compensate relatives.
    1. Pinkie F.
      
      +1
      
      12 June 2016 12: 55
      
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      It is necessary to rehabilitate, to compensate relatives.
      
      so first you need Congress to demand $ (further a large figure) to demand in order to trample the Arabian Sea in search of its drowned carcass.
  2. midivan
    
    +1
    
    12 June 2016 23: 39
    
    Quote: Pereira
    It turns out, yes.
    It turns out that he was killed for nothing.
    Marvelous are your deeds, Lord!
    
    The Lord has nothing to do with it, I would explain everything in one name-~~Head~~Glory to the CIA: Saudi leadership is not involved in the September 11 attacks
2. dmi.pris1
  
  0
  
  12 June 2016 11: 44
  
  Of course, he needs to be rehabilitated .. With all that remains for the CIA .. Hold the thief, the thief shouts ..
3. V.ic
  
  +3
  
  12 June 2016 11: 55
  
  Quote: Alexander Romanov
  Stop, Bin Laden has nothing to do with it?
  
  Benya / operational alias "incense" / passed through the Mossad.
ALABAY45

+5

12 June 2016 11: 34

Who would doubt: "Rafik is innocent! Rafik is supremely innocent ..."
avt

+5

12 June 2016 11: 35

And for the good grandmothers from normal boys
The commission of inquiry did not find evidence of the involvement of Saudi Arabia in the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in New York, RIA Novosti reported the statement by CIA Director John Brennan.
And he won’t find it until they drink the first tranche and receive the next.
t118an

+8

12 June 2016 11: 38

* Democracy * does not know who to hang the crime organized by the US intelligence agencies, with the aim of capturing foreign countries under the guise of fighting terrorism, which allegedly attacked the WTC on September 11 ...

Terrorist number 1 in the world is the United States.
3vs

+4

12 June 2016 11: 40

"Earlier, American publications reported that" in the report of the commission of investigation of terrorist attacks, published in 2002, there are 28 secret pages in which, we are talking about the support by officials in Saudi Arabia of the terrorists who staged the September 11 attacks. "
There is probably a super secret page about the preparation and conduct of terrorist attacks themselves.
naglosaksami ...
activator

+3

12 June 2016 11: 45

The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the September 11 attacks
This is true of the attacks involved in the US leadership.
Dart2027

+4

12 June 2016 11: 53

The attacks were the work of the United States itself, which needed an excuse to invade Afghanistan and the Middle East.
iouris

+1

12 June 2016 11: 56

Who would believe the CIA now? In addition, the “fault of the leadership of the KSA” has not so much legal as political and financial content. The US is unable to service its debt to the KSA. Today, Iran is a much more interesting country for the United States. However, the United States is not a "country", but a cluster of TNCs, which has very diverse interests, so all major players have their own lobbyists in Washington, and in different departments.
1. Amurets
  
  +2
  
  12 June 2016 12: 32
  
  Quote: iouris
  Who will believe the CIA now?
  
  And when did the CIA believe it? From the day of its creation, lies to lies, provocation to provocations. And Alkaida is the native child of the CIA, originally created to fight the limited contingent of Soviet troops in Afghanistan.
Observer2014

+6

12 June 2016 12: 00

Ladies and gentlemen! Yes, everything is fine! No need to worry about the American September 11! Only the last cretin on Earth believes that. This could be performed by "professionals" from the mountains of Afghanistan. Especially I like how "the plane flew into the Pentagon" . Generally a masterpiece! Not an airplane, not a video. Americans are Hollywood! Everything else .....! And how can all this be taken seriously The only thing they got there was the BACSS. And then the soap bubble as well as the Moon epic Built and designed to hit passenger jets. Shacks have developed online like house of cards I propose to rename the United States to "Holliopia".
Erg

+2

12 June 2016 12: 02

Not a single skyscraper in the world has NEVER fell from a fire. If our government for "diplomatic reasons" cannot tell the truth to the barmaley in the face, this does not mean that we do not understand anything here.
1. Cat man null
  
  0
  
  12 June 2016 12: 09
  
  Quote: Erg
  Not a single skyscraper in the world has NEVER did not fall from the fire
  
  - well, strictly speaking, no skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) NEVER not rammed by Boeings
  - although, I agree - the picture of the collapse of the building was ... more than eloquent
  
  Quote: Erg
  If our government for "diplomatic reasons" cannot tell the truth to the barmaley in the eye
  
  - here explain to me, stupid: and what for it do you and "our government" need?
  1. Erg
    
    +1
    
    12 June 2016 12: 15
    
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    - well, strictly speaking, not a single skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) has NEVER rammed Boeing
    
    And what - the towers collapsed directly from the entry of letaks?
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    - explain to me, stupid: what for it is necessary for you and our government?
    
    Much more interesting, sir, is the topic "what for our government DOES NOT NEED". Don’t you?
    1. Cat man null
      
      +2
      
      12 June 2016 13: 20
      
      Quote: Erg
      And what - the towers collapsed directly from the entry of letaks?
      
      - Well, he said so ...
      
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      the picture of the collapse of the building was ... more than eloquent
      
      - the scale, of course, is not the same. But - something reminds, no?
  2. Observer2014
    
    +5
    
    12 June 2016 12: 24
    
    Cat man null
    - Well, strictly speaking, not a single skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) has NEVER rammed
    
    Do not consider it "hitting" You in "litso" "pieces of iron" from which skyscrapers are made, have you seen ?! I saw. There, in order to overwhelm the entire assembly, you are tormented by the Boeings to fight about it. And I’m completely silent about the fire. Something that doesn’t fall on bridges and skyscrapers almost for days. You can’t give examples? Boring.
    1. Cat man null
      
      +1
      
      12 June 2016 13: 25
      
      Quote: Observer2014
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      - Well, strictly speaking, not a single skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) has NEVER rammed
      Do not consider it "hitting" ...
      
      - Yes, not at all ... about Boeing - the attempt to ironize was .. the campaign was unsuccessful
      
      Quote: Observer2014
      You in "litso" "pieces of iron" from which skyscrapers are made have seen?
      
      - skyscrapers - no. The railway bridge somehow painted .. personally
      - I represent the difference in scale
      
      Quote: Observer2014
      There, to fill up the whole assembly, you are tormented by the Boeings to fight about it. But I’m silent about the fire
      
      - everything is correct. Do not add, do not take. I posted a movie there above - this is to make the irony clearer
  3. Sid.74
    
    +2
    
    12 June 2016 12: 52
    
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    - well, strictly speaking, not a single skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) has NEVER rammed Boeing
    
    Boeing is not ... but the intentional ram was not a skyscraper bomber.
    
    Before 2001, a similar catastrophe happened after the end of the war - the plane crashed into a New York skyscraper 28 July 1945, when a bomber flew through the fog at a speed of about 200 miles per hour and collided with the Empire State Building. Fourteen people were killed and dozens were injured .
    
    When the plane crashed, one of its engines flew off from the north wall, and broke through the south wall, being on the roof of a neighboring building. The wreckage of the plane and the buildings tore up the elevator shaft and cables, killing two people. Smith died immediately with two other crew members. The building killed 11 people working in their places, and more than two dozen were injured. These were mainly Catholic Relief Service employees who still maintain their offices on the 79 floor.
    
    The building was damaged in $ 1 million. The situation was facilitated by the fact that it was Saturday, the offices were not fully staffed, which helped to avoid more damage and casualties. The reports of the time stated that within three months the repair of the 78 and 79 floors was taking place - the bent beams had to be repaired, the walls were erected, and the two floors of the offices were rebuilt.
    
    Read more at http://www.pravda.ru/news/world/northamerica/usacanada/17-03-2015/1252696-state-
    0/
    
    But the result ...
    
    Not farm look ...
    Of course, the B-25 is ten times lighter than a fully loaded 767 Boeing, but still this case leads to some thoughts.
    1. Erg
      
      +2
      
      12 June 2016 13: 09
      
      Is there a photo of the "core" of the skyscraper? I assume he's unharmed.
      1. Cat man null
        
        0
        
        12 June 2016 13: 27
        
        Quote: Erg
        Is there a photo of the "core" of the skyscraper? I guess he's unharmed
        
        - and who is this (I mean the "core of the skyscraper")?
        
        Erg
        
        +1
        
        12 June 2016 13: 43
        
        The central frame ("building pivot") that bears the main load. Something like this.
        
        Sid.74
        
        0
        
        12 June 2016 14: 14
        
        Quote: Erg
        Is there a photo of the "core" of the skyscraper? I assume he's unharmed.
        
        It seems not ...
        This is what I found from the photos for this occasion.
        
        And finally, a photo of a pentogon, which according to legend, also attacked Boeing ..
        
        You see boeing? And I'm not ....
        
        Erg
        
        +1
        
        12 June 2016 18: 26
        
        Thanks for the photo. With the Pentagon, the Yankees were completely embarrassed ... By the way, I'm not saying anything, but there is a lot of information on the internet on the topic "were there any planes at all." There is something to think about.
  4. Weyland
    
    0
    
    12 June 2016 19: 58
    
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    well, strictly speaking, not a single skyscraper in the world (except Gemini, essno) has NEVER been rammed by Boeings
    
    But in this one a skyscraper during WWII accidentally flew a bomber with full bomb loading - ICHSH, did not collapse after all!
    1. Cat man null
      
      0
      
      12 June 2016 20: 27
      
      Quote: Weyland
      But to this very skyscraper during WWII, a bomber with a full bomb load accidentally flew in - ICHS, it didn’t collapse!
      
      - If you are talking about the WTC, then during the Second World War it was not yet
      - and if you're talking about the Empire State Building, then this is a comrade Sid.74 already described above. In colors, colors and with photos
      - about "full bomb load" - exactly?
kotvov

+4

12 June 2016 12: 03

Saudi Arabia has become one of the best partners of the United States in the fight against terrorism. ",,
straight from the heart relieved. the best accomplices-organizers of terrorists.
samarin1969

+2

12 June 2016 12: 05

Yeah! This impoverished, broken-down Afghanistan has suddenly triggered a super-operation. Then Bush bombed him (or did he mix something up again?).
Now Mr. Brennan should always be asked again: "Are you serious or you dreamed again" 28 secret pages "
Erg

+2

12 June 2016 12: 11

In general, an "interesting" picture comes out. A whole bunch of cretins, whose names are known to everyone, who killed several thousand Americans, freely roam free, rubbing everyone with stories about "terrorism" that do not stand up to any criticism ... And everyone pretends that they believe it ... And where will it come this world? Some kind of clinic.
dchegrinec

+2

12 June 2016 12: 14

And this is not surprising! Those whom the United States is ready to bomb should be involved, and there are not many of them on the planet. The rest "have nothing to do with the September 11 attacks"!
APASUS

+3

12 June 2016 12: 26

I directly see how Arabian shepherds moved from camels to Boeing and rammed skyscrapers.
Yak28

+3

12 June 2016 12: 35

The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the attacks of September 11, and the leadership of the CIA is involved?
Mountain shooter

+1

12 June 2016 12: 40

Are they the fighters against terrorism? It is unlikely that even Fundington produced financing of terrorism more than them.
dmitrymb

+1

12 June 2016 12: 56

"bad good policeman" They muddied themselves, they themselves disentangle, and onlookers opened their mouths
cap

0

12 June 2016 13: 25

“In fact, research has shown that, unfortunately, these attacks did take place, but it was the work of al-Qaeda, (al-Qaeda leader Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and the like,” Brennan added. noting that “Over the past 15 years, Saudi Arabia has become one of the best partners in the United States in the fight against terrorism.”

Especially after the threat to bring down the government bond market
Super news!
1. Papandopulo
  
  0
  
  12 June 2016 13: 30
  
  Tried to hang 9/11 on Iran recently ...
ollee

+1

12 June 2016 13: 42

it is really the so-called terrorist act of Bush’s handiwork! ... and the Boeing was shot down in Donetsk, his handiwork and the plane in Syria his handwriting ....
Foxbed

+1

12 June 2016 13: 52

The head of the CIA: the leadership of Saudi Arabia is not involved in the September 11 attacks

Uhhhhh ... uh! I’ll wedge my mom’s mouth!
Sergey333

0

12 June 2016 15: 05

In fact, research has shown that, unfortunately, these attacks did take place, but it was the work of Al-Qaeda

Which was created, armed and financed by the United States. Hence the conclusion: the Americans who died during the terrorist act committed suicide.
Zomanus

0

12 June 2016 15: 08

The Americans, too, are not fools, to make such an enemy.
And then, it can be considered part of the election race.
Now all the fires that the States have set fire to,
try not to inflate until after the election.
1. Pinkie F.
  
  0
  
  12 June 2016 16: 11
  
  Quote: Zomanus
  The Americans, too, are not fools, to make such an enemy.
  
  yes, the norms - the threat of the guys from the gas station to sell assets before the employees have time to freeze them has worked. Back in April, skeptics said that the States would agree with the SA. So it is) The matter is not even in the Saudis themselves, from the sale of $ 750 million of securities the financial system will not collapse, but the point, IMHO, is in the precedent - for dudes in burnus, which are third among the holders of treasure, others can reach out, including some speculators and entire governments. Then there would be fun in the market.
Antiprogressor

0

12 June 2016 15: 53

The leadership, which is responsible for imitating the terrorist attack, removes the charge of those who are responsible for hundreds of real terrorist attacks. Hand washes a terrorist friend, comrade and business partner terrorist. But the CIA director did not call the national intelligence director Klapper a real developer and participant in the preparation, implementation and misinformation of the Malaysian Boeing disaster in 2014. And because the clapper more than once secretly visited Ukraine, preparing a disaster and misinformation. But the clapper created all the conditions for 11.09.2001/007/XNUMX because he headed the service necessary for remote control. The bloody performance itself helped create the very post that Klapper, the national intelligence service of the United States, leads. Look at his biography, compare dates and posts. Moreover, this professor Moriarty was involved in the provocation over Sakhalin with flight kalXNUMX. And then he headed the very intelligence of the US Air Force, which must be led in order to commit a catastrophe. Very interesting person. A person who owns all the information on the globe. Do not believe - check.
tolmachiev51

0

12 June 2016 17: 58

Money is everything !!! The "vaunted" obkom democracy for the loot "leaked" the victims of the terrorist attack, a vile country.
L42

0

12 June 2016 18: 32

"This was the work of al-Qaeda, (al-Qaeda leader Ayman) Al-Zawahiri and others like him."
Then it’s interesting, in that case, why hide this part of the report for so many years.
da Vinci

0

12 June 2016 18: 48

Maybe not. But I remember well the sanctions against Libya for the charge of covering up terrorists, the accusation of Cuba, the accusation of Bulgaria (attempt on the pope), the accusations of the USSR and Russia of supporting terrorism. These were official statements!
andrewkor

0

12 June 2016 20: 24

It’s a sin, of course, but in 2001, I still trudge on the sight of burning and collapsed skyscrapers !!
Ros 56

0

12 June 2016 21: 52

Yes, all normal people know that the CIA exists to hide the truth, and therefore lies like a gray gelding. Everything as usual is nothing new.
erik cartman

0

13 June 2016 07: 49

Quote: cniza
But sooner or later the truth will come up and then everyone will see the ears of the CIA for all the deeds.

While these ears come out, the CIA will wash off green wrappers under this business. Efficiency rolls over: 15 years Departments, CIA Directorates have been investigating and such an epic result. All champagne and Congress medal.
Svetovod

0

13 June 2016 14: 50

Rather, the CIA leadership was involved in the 9.11.2001/XNUMX/XNUMX