Military Review

Russians are much more right than the West (Politiken, Denmark)

75
Russians are much more right than the West (Politiken, Denmark)



“The fact that Denmark is sending soldiers to the Baltic states is correct, but then we must take them out of other places,” says international politics professor Ole Wæver. What Russia is saying about Europe provoking it and about aggressive NATO, which violates previous agreements and climbs into the “Russian garden”, is not only a matter of concern for the West, but is also true.

It says Ole Waver, a professor of international politics at the University of Copenhagen. In his opinion, the idea of ​​a Russian threat to the West is not the main thing. Because on closer examination, we were historically a threat to Russia.

“In many ways, Russians are more right than the West in the interpretation of what happened in the first 20 years after the end of the Cold War and before the 2010 year. The Russian interpretation is much closer to reality than the western one. We treated them disrespectfully, like a third-class country, ”he says.

The professor points to examples of arms escalation, which for NATO were a response to "Russian aggression." For example, the notorious missile shield, which, if there was a base in Romania, could bring down enemy missiles launched against Europe, as well as the general increase in the number of warships in the Baltic Sea and tanks in countries bordering Russia.

Moreover, it’s quite natural that Russia regards as a manifestation of NATO’s aggression the fact that many former Soviet republics have now become members of the North Atlantic defensive alliance, despite verbal agreements reached after the fall of the Soviet Union, that NATO will stand aside It is from these states, says Ole Waver.

And there is no talk about Russian expansion

For the West, proof of Russian aggressiveness is the annexation by Russia of the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine in 2014. But according to Ole Vevera, this should not be viewed as an expansion on the part of Russia, but as a strategy aimed at expressing itself wherever possible.

This should be compared with Russian provocations with submarines in the Baltic Sea and combat aircraft in Swedish and Danish airspace, which are an expression of the fact that “the Russians are perfectly able to seize the initiative and surprise”.

“The Russians have found out that if you act like the biggest bully in a class who breaks the rules and creates a little chaos, it gives you some strength. And they succeeded in such a strategy in the sense that they managed to return Russia to the world map. But it would be completely wrong to interpret this as a manifestation of Russian expansion, ”says Ole Waver.

“Russia knows perfectly well that it cannot attack a NATO member country, since this will trigger the alliance’s“ musketeer oath ”and end in a big war. Therefore, the fear of a Russian invasion of Eastern European countries is exaggerated, ”said Vever.

Danish military participation in the Baltic states is reasonable

In response to Russia's “surprises”, NATO plans these days to deploy up to 6 thousands of soldiers in the Baltic countries, as well as in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.

Denmark is ready to decide that we will send 150 soldiers to one of the Baltic countries, which will be part of the buildup of NATO forces. Ole Waver believes that this is a good idea, since this step will help plug the remaining security holes in Europe.

“It says a lot about the need to stop the arms race in Eastern Europe, but it is in the Baltic countries that we should continue building up our forces. This is in full compliance with the course towards the Baltic Sea, which Denmark has been conducting for the last 30 years. In addition, this region is one of the few places where Russia could specifically destroy something, ”he says.

“But it’s very important that, building up armaments there, we would show restraint in other places - for example, we don’t need to send troops to Poland, Romania and Bulgaria, because they want it so much because in terms of security they don’t represent the same hole in relations with Russia. And NATO should also abandon its foolish plans related to missile defense, which can only be perceived as aggression, ”says Ole Vaver.
Author:
Originator:
http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE3223951/professor-russerne-har-meget-mere-ret-end-vesten/
75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Altona
    Altona 31 May 2016 21: 30
    +28
    He started for his health, ended up in the Baltics. And yours, and our chtoli podmahil? Only Denmark needs to be surrounded by "fences" and "buffer zones".
    1. The black
      The black 31 May 2016 21: 33
      +18
      Started for health
      ... and then they brought weed and he smoked ... laughing е
      1. cniza
        cniza 31 May 2016 22: 10
        +6
        Well, he’s good, though not so much fun.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. GSH-18
        GSH-18 3 June 2016 00: 54
        0
        Ole Waver believes this is a good idea, as this step will help to shut up remaining security holes in Europe.

        Well ridiculed laughing The holes you have right in Brussels, you guys, the terrorists have already demonstrated this! And you are all Russia’s aggressor, Russia’s aggressor! Already not even funny fool
    2. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 31 May 2016 21: 40
      +8
      Quote: Altona
      And yours and ours chtoli waved?

      Mayonnaise in my head from Western stamps and common sense.
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 31 May 2016 22: 20
        +11
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Altona
        And yours and ours chtoli waved?

        Mayonnaise in my head from Western stamps and common sense.

        "This is in full accordance with the course Denmark has been pursuing for the Baltic Sea over the past 30 years."

        And also a professor, and put on his hat. The course of Denmark and the whole West in relation to the Baltic Sea over the past 1000 years. It will be more accurate.

        “The Russians have figured out that if you act like the biggest bully in the class who breaks the rules and creates a little chaos, it gives you some strength. And they succeeded in such a strategy "

        Well, if Russia is a bully, then Denmark is an aggressor, sending its troops thousands of kilometers to create threats and intimidation.
        And not a word about Helsinki, the return to the borders of NATO during the Cold War. Europe was safe during the Cold War - equilibrium. Now with the expansion of NATO, Europe can quietly cross the line and that's it. War. But the professor’s head doesn’t. Some hooligans. What politicians - such and such a policy.
        1. midivan
          midivan 31 May 2016 23: 28
          +8
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          Well, if Russia is a bully, then Denmark is an aggressor, sending its troops thousands of kilometers to create threats and intimidation.

          yes no, Denmark is not an aggressor they are a musketeer lol I see he didn’t hear a joke about chalk lol
    3. Karasik
      Karasik 31 May 2016 21: 43
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      And yours and ours chtoli waved?

      He showed maximum tolerance. This is a custom in Europe. wassat
      1. yehat
        yehat 1 June 2016 11: 30
        0
        Yes, what tolerance is there? It’s good that he admitted that NATO has gone too far in some places, but not where it concerns Denmark’s interests and parry threats to it, even invented (garrisons in the Baltic states). I would say a chic example of European small-town nationalism.
        Logic, by the way, is very similar to Hitler’s in Mine Campf.
    4. Finches
      Finches 31 May 2016 21: 48
      +17
      To be honest, I wanted to be smart, arguing about the wife of Alexander III, the Danish princess, Peter III - the Duke of Holstein-Gottorp, a gift from Catherine the Great in the form of the lands of Schleswig-Holstein ... but remembering that Denmark resisted the Wehrmacht for exactly 6 hours, I realized the meaning this is not because the state - Denmark is not serious at all, and in particular with all their fabrications! laughing

      But individual citizens of Denmark, I hope they are the majority, can be respected for their position to remain human despite the fact that they are residents of the signature ... of the "free" European Union!
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 31 May 2016 22: 01
        +3
        Quote: Finches
        To be honest, I wanted to be smart, arguing about the wife of Alexander III,

        You can be clever about Yaroslavna, who was exiled to unwashed Europe drinks
        1. Finches
          Finches 31 May 2016 22: 14
          +1
          You can! But France, still not Denmark ... Although Shakespeare glorified it with his Hamlet extraordinarily! drinks
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 31 May 2016 22: 48
            0
            Quote: Finches
            But France, still not Denmark

            At that time, storage was Ukraine, and Denmark by Russia laughing
            1. poquello
              poquello 31 May 2016 23: 29
              0
              Quote: Tusv
              Quote: Finches
              But France, still not Denmark

              At that time, storage was Ukraine, and Denmark by Russia laughing

              1051, a bit late for Denmark itp-Russia

              http://mylove7.beon.ru/26051-035-knjazhna-anna-jaroslavna-koroleva-francii.zhtml
    5. Skif83
      Skif83 1 June 2016 07: 09
      +1
      There are suspicions that they all sit there on the perfect "Delphic" grass.
      The bottom line: We yes, threatened and threaten Russia, we are wrong; Russia is unlikely to attack the EEC; We do not need missile defense, but we must confirm and increase our presence in the Baltic States (at least even by 150 Danish soldiers) ... blah blah blah ...
      History teaches them nothing.
      Firstly, Russia itself never attacked anyone (probably this is a consequence of its self-sufficiency in every sense !?).
      Secondly, often the war with Russia ended for the enemy in his own lair, which was probably scored in different Denmark and the Netherlands?
      And thirdly, Russia cannot be conquered, you can try to destroy, but military methods are hardly feasible without mutual destruction. The method of A. Dulles remains.
      May the gods grant that we are cured of the "diseases" of the late Soviet period, the period of Gorbachism and Eltsinism; and there were no more notorious "gum" and "jeans", for which we allowed to destroy our country.
      1. yehat
        yehat 1 June 2016 11: 31
        0
        not too many slogans?
  2. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 31 May 2016 21: 31
    +10
    "... violates previous agreements and climbs into the" Russian garden "
    There were, here, two "nerds", we do not deny! One, abandoned the experiments in 1812, the other - in 1945 ... But, they "self-destructed" ...
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 31 May 2016 21: 38
      +2
      Quote: ALABAY45
      "... violates previous agreements and climbs into the" Russian garden "
      There were, here, two "nerds", we do not deny! One, abandoned the experiments in 1812, the other in 1945 ... But, they "self-destructed" ..

      Yes, perhaps the third one, if any, will become a VEGETABLE!
    2. Disorder
      Disorder 31 May 2016 22: 22
      +1
      "What is good for the Russian ......" They ate something wrong. laughing
    3. russkiy redut
      russkiy redut 31 May 2016 23: 16
      +2
      Russia paid a heavy price both times for victory
  3. Kent0001
    Kent0001 31 May 2016 21: 31
    +6
    .... in short, further quote from Lavrov. There are no other words.
  4. Teberii
    Teberii 31 May 2016 21: 32
    +2
    NATO is not right, but Denmark is obliged to send its forces to the Baltic states and Poland. And then all of a sudden the Russians will attack Denmark, so at least something will remain from the army.
  5. nik-karata
    nik-karata 31 May 2016 21: 37
    +9
    Epta! Denmark will send 150 soldiers to support the pants to sprat-eaters !!! Nah, now we won’t win! laughing
  6. faterdom
    faterdom 31 May 2016 21: 42
    +6
    And who is Denmark with the Danish professor? Militarily? Like Lithuania, which reassured that it would not attack Russia? And why is Ole Wever better than Olle-Lukoye?
    After all, the French and the Dutch and the Danes sent their eagles as part of the SS divisions to defend Western values, already defending them near Moscow. Unsuccessfully. Almost no one came back. That's what they need, every Charlemagne to remember more often.
  7. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 31 May 2016 21: 43
    +6
    it is in the Baltic states that we should continue to build up our forces. This is in full accordance with the course regarding the Baltic Sea that Denmark has been pursuing over the past 30 years. In addition, this region is one of the few places where Russia could specifically destroy something.»
    And here, Mr. Mathias Petersen, let me disagree with you. The fact is that if someone, by his perplexity or thoughtfulness, touches us, we can destroy all of Europemercy will not be to anyone. And 1945 year will seem to you a children's party.
  8. Monos
    Monos 31 May 2016 21: 44
    +5
    For me, so frankly Russophobic article. Of course, I understand that the enemy must be known in person, but why put it here?
  9. APASUS
    APASUS 31 May 2016 21: 47
    +8
    Such a specific analysis from Denmark borders on an excuse. It seems like there is an understanding of the problem, but poor sprats ............... laughing laughing fool
    1. Moore
      Moore 1 June 2016 05: 51
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      Such a specific analysis from Denmark borders on an excuse. It seems like there is an understanding of the problem, but poor sprats ............... laughing laughing fool

      Everything goes to that, sprats are actively being prepared for receiving soup. But those, judging by the enthusiasm of the sprat leaders, are not even against it. On the contrary - with all their might they make real, solid targets from their puppet countries.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. kit_bellew
      kit_bellew 1 June 2016 08: 53
      0
      Yes, they have no understanding of the problem. And if there is, then they are silent in a rag and sniff in two holes ...
      The problem of Denmark itself is that in terms of international politics, Denmark is nobody. Like the vast majority of EEC member states, except for Great Britain, Germany and, perhaps, France. By the way, if Denmark had not surrendered to the Reich in 6 hours, it would have been conquered in 6 days, and the Danes would have ceased to exist as a nation. Another thing is that who needs it at all? A thousand years ago, it was a predatory state of the Vikings, like the Iron Islands in "Game of Thrones", and directed a nix on all sorts of "kingdoms" of Britons, Franks and other Untermensch of that time. Subsequently, Bismarck, having chopped off Schleswig and Holstein from Denmark, did not go further, although he could, because it is economically unprofitable - there is nothing to take from them.
      So Denmark sits at the opera for exactly 400-500 years, and sends, as in the good old days, as many as 150 soldiers to fight for European values. And what were those values ​​always? Right: gold and slaves. And who only thought that in 70 years the priorities that had remained unchanged for two millennia could have changed?
      In the old days, 150 bearded assassins with axes - it was a pretty decent gang for the exploitation of coastal fishing villages. Although now, probably, too wassat Latvians and other Estonians will probably rejoice: after all, the Vikings raid, the granddaughter is the Vikings raid © a bearded anecdote lol
  10. masiya
    masiya 31 May 2016 21: 48
    +1
    Trepatology, as usual with these Western talkers, not to say, but not to say anything, only demagogy ... how tired of all this, we recall our good old "iron curtain", they pushed us through the voice of America and free Europe, and we have not seen or heard ... now the time is different, the information space cannot be forbidden ... But it is reasonable to look at all this chatter. !!
  11. Tusv
    Tusv 31 May 2016 21: 51
    0
    We treated them disrespectfully as a third-grade country

    I would like to say thank you very much for this. We could lie in the place of Ukraine. And so you opened your eyes, what are you "friends" with beads
  12. Orionvit
    Orionvit 31 May 2016 21: 53
    0
    He is a fool, or pretends to be. Then he has Russia right, the West climbs into the Russian garden, the West threw Russia, Russia should not expect aggression, and then
    “It says a lot about the need to stop the arms race in Eastern Europe, but it is in the Baltic countries that we should continue building up our forces. This is in full compliance with the course towards the Baltic Sea, which Denmark has been conducting for the last 30 years. In addition, this region is one of the few places where Russia could specifically destroy something, ”he says.
    Somehow not sequentially.
  13. Berkut24
    Berkut24 31 May 2016 21: 58
    +2
    Who else is ready to put their country to ashes for the Chukhons, who are most concerned about Russian names?
  14. esaul1950
    esaul1950 31 May 2016 21: 58
    0
    And where is this great country of Denmark?
  15. sabakina
    sabakina 31 May 2016 22: 04
    +1
    In many ways, Russians are more right than the West

    "Our cause is just, the enemy will be defeated, victory will be ours."
    It seems they didn’t understand anything ...
    1. not main
      not main 31 May 2016 22: 16
      0
      Quote: sabakina
      "Our cause is just, the enemy will be defeated, victory will be ours."
      It seems they didn’t understand anything ...

      Yes, they all understood! That's just their memory is short!
  16. x587x
    x587x 31 May 2016 22: 07
    0
    Someone say why we need the Baltic states ???
    1. vanavatny
      vanavatny 31 May 2016 22: 29
      +2
      a strange question, now we’re milking a baby taken from an unfortunate eurogay and throwing a half-liter tear on a bear under the president’s portrait to beat off a sprat factory: no one knows why the heck she is needed, they don’t know, so they’re trying to justify their thrice worthless independence from common sense
    2. sabakina
      sabakina 31 May 2016 22: 33
      +2
      Quote: x587x
      Someone say why we need the Baltic states ???

      Well, how to say you? There is a cat, there is a mouse. Mice are afraid of a cat, because he is a cat, although he is fed "from the belly", why should he eat mice? The food chain doesn't work here. Politician brother ...
  17. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 31 May 2016 22: 26
    +1
    Well, if they have such professors. Then what to take offense at them? As there S. Lavrov used to say: - "Morons b..d?" Absolutely in a hole. After reading this material, I feel in comparison with Ole Vever "The giant of thought, academician, founder and father of a progressive geo-political outlook. laughing lol crying
    1. poquello
      poquello 31 May 2016 22: 57
      0
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      Well, if they have professors like that. Then Cho take offense at them?

      it is necessary to somehow explain the dispatch of 150 warriors, well, he will not say that the US was sent, so it turns out "Gene, the mutator needs to be washed more often."
  18. rus9875
    rus9875 31 May 2016 22: 29
    +2
    Already as many as 150 fearless Danish soldiers will go to protect the sprat-eaters ... yes, they broke the whole buzz for us - now the Baltic states are invulnerable ...
  19. Disorder
    Disorder 31 May 2016 22: 31
    +2
    In addition, this region is one of the few places where Russia could specifically destroy something, ”he says.

    laughing The Baltic states themselves destroyed everything.
  20. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 31 May 2016 22: 37
    +1
    “There is much to say that we must stop the arms race in Eastern Europe, but it is in the Baltic countries that we should continue to build up our forces.
    Maybe the "Baltic tigers" are paying him extra to propagandize the transfer of troops to the northern flank of NATO (to the Baltic states) laughing
    Although ... in fact, Petersen voiced the goals and objectives of Denmark. The country is strong, but not large --- therefore, it does not see a great need for itself to invest its resources in the development of missile defense. All the same, ABM is a global, strategic, expensive manufactured product, and Denmark, as a "small shopkeeper", does not see any particular benefit for itself, because. cannot think globally. But the Baltic theater of operations in Denmark is very interesting as an area where you can project part of your military power and get a number of dividends. The structure of Danish business is in some way connected with this region, there is a mutual cultural exchange and you can feel everything in real life. here is a missile defense system, some kind of Romanians to defend --- no, the Danes do not need such hockey, but they have to "drag" in one team. All oxen drag one team and complain, I can't.
    (pictured by Matthias Petersen)
  21. alexleony
    alexleony 31 May 2016 22: 45
    +3
    Denmark is ready to decide that we will send 150 soldiers to one of the Baltic countries, which will be part of the buildup of NATO forces. Ole Waver believes that this is a good idea, since this step will help plug the remaining security holes in Europe.
    So, the rest of the countries are not holes, and they can withstand aggression? I have a break in the template, I thought that only the English Channel could stop the Russian tour of Europe.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 31 May 2016 23: 06
    +1
    Quote: esaul1950
    And where is this great country of Denmark?

    Exactly where the entrance and exit from the Baltic Sea "to the vastness of the World Ocean". And together with Norway, both in NATO, they form for us in some way the Bosphorus from the Baltic to the North Sea.
    Quote: x587x
    Someone say why we need the Baltic states ???

    We do not need it, our opponents need it: it is painfully convenient to stir up all sorts of dirty tricks near Kaliningrad.
  23. KRIG55
    KRIG55 31 May 2016 23: 10
    +3
    They must be treated, not gas sold, but treated.
    1. Redfox3k
      Redfox3k 31 May 2016 23: 26
      +1
      Do not cure, but cure them. It won’t come in any other way.
  24. midivan
    midivan 31 May 2016 23: 18
    +6
    “There is much to say that we must stop the arms race in Eastern Europe, but it is in the Baltic countries that we should continue to build up our forces. In addition, this region is one of the few places where Russia could specifically destroy something, ”he says.
    fool is it for sure professor ??? that strong doubts crept in, did he hear anything about the Strategic Missile Forces? tell this idiot that where Russia could specifically destroy something ”is called planet earth, and in general it’s strange to hear from animal rippers about aggression request
  25. Tanya
    Tanya 31 May 2016 23: 19
    +5
    How do they become professors there ???
    He composed some kind of nonsense, consisting of unrelated and conflicting proposals. Russian garden ... missile shield ... musketeer's oath ... mother's galoshes ... winked
    Written in REM sleep or under a bottle? fool
  26. rosstov
    rosstov 1 June 2016 00: 14
    +1
    Great logic: the Russians do not threaten anyone, the West provokes them all the time, the Russians are right in trying to defend their country, but the West is not, BUT is it still correct that the West is "building up arms" on the Russian border? The professor definitely smoked something between the first and second parts
  27. atamankko
    atamankko 1 June 2016 00: 43
    0
    He understood what he wrote, professor?
  28. freejack
    freejack 1 June 2016 00: 53
    0
    I added the article. yes, you are all right, but if it were an ordinary article from a huge series of Western articles ... in the same place everywhere we were leveled with dirt, and this one even decided on:
    In many ways, Russians are more right than the West in interpreting what happened in the first 20 years after the end of the Cold War and before 2010.

    Now Western journalists are losing their jobs for such an interpretation of what is happening ... they now have "strengthened democracy" ... this one at least tried to move away from this template ... respect!
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 1 June 2016 05: 09
      0
      Quote: freejack
      this one at least tried to move away from this template ... respect!

      However, after your quote from the article, the following:
      but it is in the Baltic states that we should continue to build up our strengths. This is in full accordance with the course regarding the Baltic Sea that Denmark has been pursuing over the past 30 years.

      And so she crosses out everything said earlier. The Baltic Sea turns out to be the Danish Sea, and there is nothing for any Russian to do there. So let's wait with respect.
  29. VeryBravePiggy
    VeryBravePiggy 1 June 2016 01: 05
    0
    Another smearing of snot on the mirror boots - it seems there is some kind of reflection, but because of the snot it is not visible.
    Rarely rarely do truly sensible and realistic reflections appear in the press, and they are all about the same thing: in the event of a global conflict, most of the "pawns" will quickly but painfully die. It is possible that not only pawns, but also pieces, and even kings with queens ... The only chance to survive is to drive the aggressive alliance to hell, close the borders from the influx of freebies greedy for free, and actively deal with internal problems.
    But this position is terry racism, isolationism and intolerance; allies will never agree to this.
    Therefore, you guys have no choice. Big uncles from Washington tell you: don’t really rock the boat, and play your part - the role of bait / sacrifice, for which, in the event of a grand nuclear shooter, the bright democratic Jedi can violently and toughly probably even revenge on someone ...
    Seriously though, it's a shame for the European peoples. They really lost their shores, believe in the aggressive aggressive strategy of the Russians, in the savagery and uncontrollability of the Russians and Putin himself. At the same time, for the most part, they support NATO's aggression against Syria and Libya, do not hang the broken "bezhentsyv" on lanterns at home, and tolerate governments that have led the economies of EU countries not to prosperity, but on the contrary - to degradation.
  30. Temer
    Temer 1 June 2016 02: 20
    0
    it feels like Mr. Vaver wants to "eat the fish and sit on ..." (I apologize for my French)
  31. iouris
    iouris 1 June 2016 02: 41
    0
    What journalists in Denmark write there is not very interesting. But the top officials, the secretary general and the commander of NATO forces, said everything. And do not think that they are just "hooligans". The economies of the USA and the EU exceed our modest capabilities by 30-40 times, and in terms of population - 5 times. If this development trend is not reversed, then the outcome of the "battle for the harvest" is understandable.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 1 June 2016 08: 32
      +3
      In this case, we simply have an unprecedented superiority of forces! And given that insignificant human material in NATO, it will just be the beating of babies after their high-tech bullet-proofs run out! FACT!

      http://maxpark.com/community/14/content/1976705

  32. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 1 June 2016 03: 42
    0
    In the modern world, one must live by the principle of three DO NOT - do not believe, do not be afraid, did not ask !!!
    1. Runx135
      Runx135 1 June 2016 05: 34
      0
      Gray ash is above the city
      There is a pillar of smoke in the city
      But if you don't like fumes
      You are not allowed into the house.
      The blind shut their ears
      It’s not clear who to sing here.
      Courteous arrogance is a feature of the indifferent,
      Ringing copper.

      The thesis is constant here -
      "Fix, but not now,"
      But if you sow in good land,
      Be afraid, ask and believe.

      The owl is not mine, but in my opinion to the point, fear Him, ask Him, and most importantly BELIEVE.
      IMHO
    2. Runx135
      Runx135 1 June 2016 05: 34
      0
      Gray ash is above the city
      There is a pillar of smoke in the city
      But if you don't like fumes
      You are not allowed into the house.
      The blind shut their ears
      It’s not clear who to sing here.
      Courteous arrogance is a feature of the indifferent,
      Ringing copper.

      The thesis is constant here -
      "Fix, but not now,"
      But if you sow in good land,
      Be afraid, ask and believe.

      The owl is not mine, but in my opinion to the point, fear Him, ask Him, and most importantly BELIEVE.
      IMHO
  33. taseka
    taseka 1 June 2016 04: 38
    0
    That's it - la-fa and the world wars begin! Everyone does not want her, but she is Bams! And it began !!! (Rather, some who really want her!)
  34. Runx135
    Runx135 1 June 2016 05: 24
    0
    Are you definitely a Dane? And then you have sprats in your head.
    The article reminded me of the speeches of Adolf G. such a quiet beginning, and then snot in all directions, squeals and hysteria. laughing Uwe heal a bit.
  35. Kotr
    Kotr 1 June 2016 05: 27
    0
    Undercooked fish is dangerous.
  36. Wolka
    Wolka 1 June 2016 05: 28
    +1
    what is 6 thousand euro-sinners in the Baltic states, bespectacled meat, it’s not even an infantry division, a brigade that doesn’t even have a headquarters, and a bunch of commanders is so mottled that you simply don’t have to talk about tactics of application and coherence in actions, so only there was something to frighten once again Russia, well, to calm the miserable little souls of the militant Balts, and also to capitalize American denyuzhki bully soldier
  37. pts-m
    pts-m 1 June 2016 05: 30
    0
    Even the name of this gay cattle base - Denmark, comes from the word ... to surrender ... They also teach Russia how to live inappropriately.
  38. K-50
    K-50 1 June 2016 06: 59
    +1
    In general, it is almost possible to agree with the author. BUT!
    This must be compared with Russian provocations with submarines in the Baltic Sea and combat aircraft in Swedish and Danish airspace. ”

    Where and when was the evidence of these incidents?
    Mattresses were hiding in Swedish airspace when fleeing from a Russian fighter. They definitely didn’t fly to Danish, only along the international corridor. The Swedes of the submarine seemed to be confused with the fish or with the Loch Ness monster.
    As always, nonsense, truth and fiction were diligently mixed and served to the gayropean "table". Say, eat the citizens, there is no time to think. request laughing
  39. freejack
    freejack 1 June 2016 07: 53
    0
    However, after your quote from the article, the following:
    but it is in the Baltic states that we should continue to build up our strengths. This is in full accordance with the course regarding the Baltic Sea that Denmark has been pursuing over the past 30 years.

    Naturally crosses out !!! .. This is a quote from professor "very strange" Ole Vever ... And I'm talking about a journalist
    Matthias Petersen ... This is his respect, at least for the honest title! smile
  40. Fame
    Fame 1 June 2016 08: 44
    0
    Denmark is ready to decide that we will send 150 soldiers to one of the Baltic countries, which will be part of the buildup of NATO forces. Ole Waver believes that this is a good idea, since this step will help plug the remaining security holes in Europe.
    ETOGES what is the most powerful force if 150 fighters close European security holes. cyborgs? terminators?
  41. nobody14
    nobody14 1 June 2016 09: 02
    0
    No words from the terrible Danish power.
    150 is a little more than the front box, and if you look at their (Baltic) parades, the lines in the pioneer camp will be larger in scale
  42. realist
    realist 1 June 2016 09: 29
    0
    European civilization is in a very complex and strange position (standing cancer in front of the United States) and how much longer will it go and how will it all end? but about the aggression of Russia, of course they should not be taught in vain — history should not be taught, but to know, Russia usually only defends itself, well, maybe a little tougher than Hitler waited. Napoleon and others!
  43. Sergey
    Sergey 1 June 2016 10: 49
    +1
    Quote: Monos
    For me, so frankly Russophobic article. Of course, I understand that the enemy must be known in person, but why put it here?

    I agree with the first part of the comment. But on the question whether it should be posted or not, I will say what it is necessary. After reading the article, they will also read the comments. The more comments are read, the brighter and CORRECT will be the conclusions based on other materials ... For example, from the book trays "All for 60 rubles", such as: E. Zemke (head of the department of military history service of the US Army) "From Stalingrad to Berlin ", V. Haupt" Battle of Moscow ", H. Scheibert" 48 kilometers to Stalingrad ". Here is the NON-OBSTRUCTIVE rewriting of history THERE. And a poorly prepared person can easily take their postulates for FAITH ... Sokolov, Kalashnikov, etc., etc. In this situation, I would like to SEE Medinsky with his analysis and conclusions ...
  44. pavelty
    pavelty 1 June 2016 12: 43
    0
    "much more right"? Translation, of course, is crooked) But in essence, Denmark is the strongest geopolitical player) I don't even remember a single news about them ...
  45. VOENOBOZ
    VOENOBOZ 1 June 2016 19: 32
    0
    Chiaba mumbled a German in 6 hours, took this Denmark and 5 years was not enough for us.
  46. andrew42
    andrew42 2 June 2016 17: 45
    0
    R1b in all its glory. Not very brains. The cultural heritage of the Roman Empire slowly but surely breathes out its last breath. Enough for one and a half thousand years. This is professorship! A lump of logic and rhetoric! I was frightened of "these Russians", - I yapped out of tone with the owners, - I was frightened again, this time for my own skin, - I lied to myself - and calmed down. All this tongue-tied Western "professors" - from the banal unwillingness to call things by their proper names, and from those very times of the "Romans of the German nation". To achieve an unfair advantage, one must lie - there is no other way, but often it is impossible to lie talentedly and dashingly (like the Bolsheviks of 1917). but it turns out this is the hum of the "intellectual".