Military Review

Supply ship launched in China

42
At the Guangzhou Shipyard International in Guangzhou (PRC), the semi-submersible cargo ship / mobile landing platform Guang Hua Kou was launched, reports Military Parity with reference to Chinese Internet users.


Supply ship launched in China


According to bloggers, "PLA navy need vessels of this class for operations on the high seas."



Guang Hua Kou, "will serve as a kind of floating port for supplying ships to remote areas of the oceans," explained in the publication.





And this is the USNS Montford Point, an American vessel, introduced into the US Navy in 2013. Its displacement is 78 thousand tons, the cruising range is about 9 thousand miles.


Photos used:
http://forum.militaryparitet.com
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 May 2016 14: 52
    +7
    How huge he is! And the muzzle is Asian. That's how they get it?
    1. Wolverine
      Wolverine 12 May 2016 15: 02
      +5
      Well, the Chinese know how to build beautiful large ships, you can’t argue with that ...
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 12 May 2016 15: 10
        0
        Quote: Wolverine
        Well, the Chinese know how to build beautiful large ships, you can’t argue with that ...

        Of the countries that build large ships - which ships do you dislike (ask out of curiosity)?
        1. proud
          proud 12 May 2016 22: 26
          0
          American!
      2. demchuk.ig
        demchuk.ig 12 May 2016 17: 44
        +2
        Quote: Wolverine
        Well, the Chinese know how to build beautiful large ships, you can’t argue with that ...

        Yes, and to hell with her, with beauty! We would not hurt a few of these muzzy!
    2. vkl.47
      vkl.47 12 May 2016 15: 11
      +2
      can transport a whole military base. to some controversial islet wink
    3. Andrey K
      Andrey K 12 May 2016 15: 12
      +14
      The Chinese are good fellows - they live by the principle: "The clever learns from the mistakes of others, and not very clever from his own." good
      We took care of the construction of ships of this class in advance, and we made a "stumbling" with the "Syrian Express" request
      I had to hurry up to buy the Ukrainian from the Turks and used Ukrainian fleet: “Kyzyl-60”, “Kazan-60”, “Vologda-50”, “Dvinitsa-50” ... request
      With a creak, but the supply of the aerospace forces in the SAR was organized yes
      Maybe after dragging and debriefing of GDP, we’ll take care of supply vessels request
      1. netslave
        netslave 12 May 2016 16: 36
        +5
        The presented photos show a docking ship, and it has slightly different functions than the simple transportation of land cargo. The main feature of vessels of this type is the ability to reduce draft by taking overboard water into special ballast tanks. Moreover, the draft is reduced so much that the central (already low) part of the vessel is completely hidden under water. In this position, another ship that needs to be transported somewhere (a drilling platform, a submarine, etc.) is launched on the docking ship. Ballast water is pumped out, the docking ship floats up, and already with cargo on board.
        Specifically, the Syrian Express hardly needs such a ship. Is it in demand in our military and civilian fleet in general? Maybe.
        1. pv1005
          pv1005 12 May 2016 23: 56
          +1
          Something like this begins.
          1. pv1005
            pv1005 12 May 2016 23: 59
            +1
            And so after.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. PSih2097
          PSih2097 13 May 2016 10: 43
          0
          Quote: netslave
          Is it in demand in our military and civilian fleet in general? Maybe.

          Well, a couple of such ships would not hurt our Navy ...


          It is curious that on the TransShelf the captain is Russian, and the team is Dutch, natural-born moroman. The ship was built in 1987 at the shipyard of Turku (Finland) for the Soviet Union. In 2004, TransShelf sold the Russian shipowner to the Dutch company Doсwise Shipping, with whom he had been on lease all the time.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. avvg
    avvg 12 May 2016 14: 53
    +6
    Soon we will read in the press, "another deep concern" of the US State Department.
    1. I doubt it
      I doubt it 12 May 2016 15: 10
      +4
      They will express it. And take care.
      But ours, it seems, does not move a single gyrus. Not about the appearance of such a vessel at the "ally", nor about the PLA Navy in general.
      А зря.
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 12 May 2016 15: 18
        +3
        Unfortunately, at the moment we cannot build something like this. It’s not easy. We need to raise a plant in Kerch. This is the only enterprise we have ..
        Quote: I doubt it
        They will express it. And take care.
        But ours, it seems, does not move a single gyrus. Not about the appearance of such a vessel at the "ally", nor about the PLA Navy in general.
        А зря.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 12 May 2016 16: 29
          +1
          Quote: dmi.pris
          Unfortunately, at the moment we cannot build something like this. There’s nothing simple ..

          For 2 years, we have one shipyard in which theoretically you can build a similar one. In Soviet times, the largest ships in the USSR were built at this enterprise - 6 tankers of project 1511.
    2. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 12 May 2016 15: 16
      +1
      What a "deep" ass they have.
      Quote: avvg
      Soon we will read in the press, "another deep concern" of the US State Department.
  3. teron
    teron 12 May 2016 14: 53
    +6
    "Guang Hua Kou," will act as a kind of floating port for supplying ships in remote areas of the oceans "

    If only they would move away from our shores. To other parts of the oceans.
  4. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 12 May 2016 14: 58
    +4
    Honestly, A WONDERFUL STEAM! We wouldn’t be in such a situation in Russia!
  5. Oml
    Oml 12 May 2016 15: 02
    0
    And here is almost a copy? No wonder.
    1. KaPToC
      KaPToC 12 May 2016 15: 48
      +1
      Similar tasks give rise to similar solutions. On the contrary, we would be surprised if the Chinese would pile something original.
  6. Altona
    Altona 12 May 2016 15: 03
    +3
    This is a floating platform for the logistics of military operations away from supply bases. In peacetime, an ordinary superlighter carrier.
  7. magician
    magician 12 May 2016 15: 13
    -1
    I wonder who designed, who controlled the workers in the construction of this miracle? How much is it completely Chinese?
  8. evil partisan
    evil partisan 12 May 2016 15: 18
    +2
    Nichrenas boat! belay
    With this, you can probably bring all our liberals to the States what . Through the Bermuda Triangle ... repeat
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 May 2016 15: 51
      0
      Here is the ship - the world's largest and most luxurious cruise ship "Harmony of the Seas"
  9. uskrabut
    uskrabut 12 May 2016 15: 24
    0
    Gorgeous little thing and the economy is needed.
  10. MiRvSeMvDoM
    MiRvSeMvDoM 12 May 2016 15: 32
    0
    Gigantic ship belay The Chinese specifically unwind the industrial flywheel. I am afraid that in the near future we will have to confront the Chinese Imperial ambitions. Damansky’s precedent does not allow him to sleep peacefully ...
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 12 May 2016 20: 14
      -1
      A ce oni Mongoliju ne zavojujut nikak ???? MNR-primerno 1/6 Rossii, vsja tablica Mendeleeva, armii po-horoschemu net, PVO net, naselenija scitaj net !!!
      1. MiRvSeMvDoM
        MiRvSeMvDoM 12 May 2016 21: 13
        0
        irina, before rushing so eagerly at my comment, read it again. I am only talking about the precedent of the Daman Peninsula as a historical fact. And this indicates the heterogeneity of Chinese foreign policy. A Chinese stick can still shoot, but not yet, there are a lot of constraints ...
        1. Karlovar
          Karlovar 13 May 2016 13: 45
          0
          Tak i Mongolia mozet strelnut, teoreticesky .... Precedent Cingiz-hana ne daet spat spokojno ...
          1. MiRvSeMvDoM
            MiRvSeMvDoM 13 May 2016 17: 13
            0
            Do you believe in the tale of Genghis Khan? The Mongols themselves do not know who it is. How could some kind of steppe people, who appeared from nowhere, enslave Russia for several centuries? You did not ask this question a case? Given the fact that the military craft in Russia was forged for centuries, and for centuries Russia successfully fought off external enemies. In the world there is not a single monument to Genghis Khan, why? And also take into account the fact that in Mongolia there is no snow and frost like ours ... This is all a big fairy tale written by false historians just to hammer into our heads what slaves can be made of us ... hi
  11. Comrade Glebov
    Comrade Glebov 12 May 2016 15: 45
    +3
    This "zhzhzhzh" is not without reason! Prepare for something in advance, well done. Apparently soon it will be possible to hear in the news about the 5th Fleet of the Chinese Navy somewhere off the coast of Guam.
  12. sub307
    sub307 12 May 2016 15: 59
    +3
    Here he is on the slipway. 98 thousand tons!
  13. egor1712
    egor1712 12 May 2016 16: 02
    +2
    Damn, but why are such ships lowered there, and during this time, the missile ship "Tatarstan", which is the flagship of the Caspian Flotilla, is returning to service after modernization. On May 12, the press service of the Southern Military District told reporters about it. Repair and modernization of "Tatarstan" began in 2014.
    request
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 12 May 2016 20: 17
      0
      Tam Gorbaceva, Gajdara, Elcina, Cubajsa, prihvatizacii ne bylo ...
    2. Blondy
      Blondy 12 May 2016 22: 22
      +1
      Quote: egor1712
      Damn, but why are such ships lowered there, and during this time, the missile ship "Tatarstan", which is the flagship of the Caspian Flotilla, is returning to service after modernization. This was on May 12, the press service of the Southern Military District told reporters. Repair and modernization of "Tatarstan" began in 2014.

      Compare the GDP figures, for even greater clarity, divide our GDP in half and throw the second half to the oligarchs, from the remaining one, roll back a third to officials and contractors - and now feel the difference.
      1. Grave With Cross 3
        Grave With Cross 3 12 May 2016 22: 53
        -1
        I beg you, don't forget Roldugin. The rat musician has $ 2 billion - this is 571 Armata tanks. This is more than 2 tank divisions, if I'm not mistaken. And something tells me that these "Roldugins" at "THEM" are like cockroaches in an old sofa. I should take these "Roldugins" and send them to the Chinese like a Trojan horse ...
  14. uyakub92
    uyakub92 12 May 2016 16: 35
    0
    Russian Navy also needs supply ships, we also have to develop this sector of the Navy
  15. Pyokhar
    Pyokhar 12 May 2016 17: 17
    +1
    Quote: gray smeet
    Quote: Wolverine
    Well, the Chinese know how to build beautiful large ships, you can’t argue with that ...

    Of the countries that build large ships - which ships do you dislike (ask out of curiosity)?


    American, for they are all stupid and arrogant in appearance. Hamovye ships, that is. yes
  16. da Vinci
    da Vinci 12 May 2016 18: 16
    0
    And why not make some kind of "Volga-Dnieper" type company for ships. And use them for the needs of the state, and sometimes for commercial interests.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 May 2016 21: 45
      0
      From the beginning, you need to find investors who want to invest tens of billions in this business.
  17. infantryman2020
    infantryman2020 12 May 2016 18: 48
    0
    We do not need any Mistrals or such ships!
    We have our own, unparalleled path!
    For example, landing of a sea landing directly on a ramp! (how many years, God forgive me).
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 13 May 2016 00: 04
      0
      Quote: infantryman2020
      We do not need any Mistrals or such ships!
      We have our own, unparalleled path!
      For example, landing of a sea landing directly on a ramp! (how many years, God forgive me).

      Well then, for starters, offer something original, not an over-the-horizon catapult.
  18. PROXOR
    PROXOR 13 May 2016 11: 20
    0
    That's really insulting. Well, ours are all doing so slowly. Even having solved the problem of gas turbine engines, we only build ships of the near zone. And who will build the ocean fleet. Who will accompany Kuzyu and Orlan?
  19. magician
    magician 21 May 2016 17: 09
    0
    The Chinese are not capable of this. They are willing to work for cheap and almost free if there is an overseer. Take it away and that's it, there is no Chinese economic miracle. The maximum that they can do is to be the world's largest copy machine.