Military Review

US refuses to support Russian initiative in UN to recognize Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam terrorist groups

40
26 April Russia took the initiative in the UN Security Council to recognize as terrorist two more groups operating in Syria. We are talking about "Ahrar al-Sham" and "Jaish al-Islam", who continue to conduct military operations against the government forces of Syria and against the civilian population of the country. The Russian delegation notes that both of these groups are in one way or another connected with the recognized terrorist "Al Qaeda" and ISIS.


US refuses to support Russian initiative in UN to recognize Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam terrorist groups


As soon as the initiative of Russia was announced, it became clear that certain countries strongly oppose the recognition of the mentioned gangs as terrorist organizations by the UN. Among the main opponents of the resolution proposed by Russia were the United States of America. US representative Samantha Power said that Russia "is going to include Syrian opposition forces in the number of terrorists to increase support for Assad."

And this statement is the official representative of the US State Department Elizabeth Trudeau (quote RIA News):
Russia is publicly trying to declare terrorist groups that are part of the cessation of hostilities.
These actions, we believe, will have a negative effect on the cessation of hostilities while we are trying to de-escalate the situation on the ground.


Representatives of the so-called High Negotiating Committee (VKP) of the Syrian opposition stated that the Russian proposal was “one of the forms of pressure on the VKP and the entire opposition of Syria”.

At the same time, neither the United States nor the Communist Party of the Soviet Union were able to answer the question of whether the “opposition” can be considered moderate, at the hands of which civilians die every day in Syria and who are not going to support the cease-fire while receiving funding and weapons from overseas.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 12 May 2016 06: 59
    +12
    are shaking over their brainchild, so much money has been invested, how can chaos be maintained ...?
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 12 May 2016 07: 21
      +9
      The United States refuses to support the initiative of the Russian Federation in the UN on the recognition of the terrorist groups "Ahrar al-Sham" and "Jaysh al-Islam" ...
      US spokeswoman Samantha Power said Russia’s "going to include Syrian opposition forces among terrorists to increase Assad’s support ..."
      Samantha Power did not deceive at all, these are really opposition forces. Only a little did not finish - this is an opposition to the very existence of the state of Syria.
      Do not wash, so skate. The USA does not succeed on the battlefield, now they use their favorite tactic - to wind up the adoption of a legal decision in their verbiage.
    2. Wolverine
      Wolverine 12 May 2016 09: 15
      +2
      I don’t understand what kind of mouse fuss, according to the ceasefire, who shoots the terrorist with a machine gun and is subject to destruction. Maybe I missed something?
  2. horoh
    horoh 12 May 2016 07: 00
    +5
    Naturally, the mattress covers will not surrender their fosterlings, so many attendants are invested in them ...
    1. Lukich
      Lukich 12 May 2016 07: 05
      +4
      Quote: horoh
      Naturally, the mattress covers will not surrender their fosterlings, so many attendants are invested in them ...

      tell me who your friend is and i will tell you who you are. folk wisdom.
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 12 May 2016 09: 35
      +2
      Quote: horoh
      Naturally, the mattress covers will not surrender their fosterlings, so many attendants are invested in them ...

      The whole point in one picture ...
      At the same time, the United States is not really bothering to cover its interest in the existence of terrorism at least somehow.
      1. Lukich
        Lukich 12 May 2016 10: 13
        +1
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        At the same time, the United States is not really bothering to cover its interest in the existence of terrorism at least somehow.

        after the collapse of the USSR, they generally ceased to be ashamed of their crimes and spit on someone else's opinion
  3. Dezinto
    Dezinto 12 May 2016 07: 02
    +6
    Has anyone been surprised?
    1. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 12 May 2016 07: 07
      +5
      Me not laughing . Here it is not necessary to be surprised, but to cry is degradation, which can be interpreted as an advancement of one’s interests, it’s obvious ... request Such things are perfectly described by S.V. Lavrov in a nutshell wink
      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 12 May 2016 07: 03
    +7
    They are good in the opinion of the United States. Heads cut humanely probably.
    1. svu93
      svu93 12 May 2016 07: 12
      +6
      I propose a moderate opposition to fire rockets with moderate warheads! Well, that would be everything in the framework of international norms, so to speak!))))
      1. Lukich
        Lukich 12 May 2016 07: 39
        +6
        Quote: svu93
        I propose a moderate opposition to fire rockets with moderate warheads! Well, that would be everything in the framework of international norms, so to speak!))))

        yes, probably already
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Amurets
      Amurets 12 May 2016 12: 20
      0
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      They are good in the opinion of the United States. Heads cut humanely probably.

      Yeah, they inject painkillers. That's why there is such a great need for Afghan heroin.
  5. Kos_kalinki9
    Kos_kalinki9 12 May 2016 07: 07
    +2
    Oh, these double standards.
  6. Pyokhar
    Pyokhar 12 May 2016 07: 09
    +3
    The Russian army in Syria must also support the "oppositionists" controlled by the United States. Democratic bombing on them. And what, tolerance must be observed. laughing
  7. brasist
    brasist 12 May 2016 07: 11
    +2
    Apparently the United States will recognize these gangs as terrorist when these (peaceful people) cut off his empty head to the "black dad" ...
  8. Yak-15
    Yak-15 12 May 2016 07: 13
    +2
    So there is nothing surprising in this. Mattress abomination goes all-in. He knows that a powerful force has appeared, and to do something similar that this scum has done with Libya or Yugoslavia, she can not. So you have to be content with such pasture.
  9. BOB044
    BOB044 12 May 2016 07: 42
    +1
    US refuses to support Russian initiative in UN to recognize Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam terrorist groups
    The United States does not give up while it needs them. And then, under the knee, as always.
  10. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 12 May 2016 07: 54
    +1
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    are shaking over their brainchild, so much money has been invested, how can chaos be maintained ...?

    The child has grown up, more money is needed. After all, it's time for him to go to Europe "to study." Do not give - you will acquire it yourself, including from your parent!
  11. guzik007
    guzik007 12 May 2016 07: 55
    +1
    Frantically looking for a formal pretext for legal support and military intervention? It looks like this.
  12. Dr. Barmaley
    Dr. Barmaley 12 May 2016 08: 03
    +7
    US refuses to support Russian initiative in UN to recognize Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam terrorist groups
  13. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 12 May 2016 08: 07
    +4
    By and large, to date, all formations in Syria that have not joined the truce can be considered terrorist. But then the States will have to officially admit supporting terrorism.
  14. Russia
    Russia 12 May 2016 08: 24
    +2
    which is not going to support a ceasefire, while receiving funding and weapons from abroad

    This phrase contains the whole answer to the question. The "chief financier" is against it! am
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Romario
    Romario 12 May 2016 08: 41
    +1
    What can we count on in the UN Security Council ?! Maybe put to a vote the question of recognizing the RF Aerospace Forces as terrorist? We'll see "Who is who?" If anything, the Chinese will veto.
  17. volodya
    volodya 12 May 2016 09: 15
    +1
    They created these groups themselves, and now they must pass them? No, they will wait, when they themselves will blow up!
  18. donavi49
    donavi49 12 May 2016 09: 19
    +1
    Well, Ahrar gets directly TOU complexes.

    The current offensive strategy looks like this:
    - Nusryata, with Jude Al Aksa and all sorts of Uzbeks from small groups, are rapidly gaining on an important point. Ahrar acts on support. The Americans shrug, saying that Nusra and her children are terrorists, what else do you need.

    - after the capture, the Akhrarovites immediately enter it with the TOU and they all dig in intensively, organize the defense. Already by the 3 day, this is a well-fortified point, which is very difficult to attack, since the TOU arrives from 2,5 km already.

    - Americans welcome the release of another n.p. from the bloody regime’s troops and officially notify that in the village only opposition members who observe the ceasefire and their bombing will be a gross violation of the agreements.

    So it was with El-Yeiss, so now with the Fog, the next Karasi.
  19. Romin
    Romin 12 May 2016 10: 08
    0
    And sometimes I am paralyzed by our naive foreign policy ...
    Such an action (on the introduction of certain groupings) must be performed during, at the time of bargaining by important agreements.
    As it was in Geneva when they arranged a meeting between official Damascus and the opposition. Then it was necessary to put all the points over Y.
    And what was this meeting, a trifle. But no, this is legitimization! And if our foreign ministry has given a weak spot in its positions or how often it has splashed the situation, then of course you can fart loudly, I do not mind. I'm only interested in the specific achievement of goals, and talking is also not bad;) maybe this is the beginning of something more! As with Ukraine! Grand plan! Everyone was thrilled to the screens ... Oops .. There is no news in Ukraine ... After half a year, and about Syria ...
  20. 96423lom
    96423lom 12 May 2016 10: 56
    0
    They don’t surrender their own.
  21. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 12 May 2016 11: 00
    0
    US refuse
    The terrorist will not peck out the eyes of a terrorist!
  22. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 12 May 2016 11: 52
    +1
    US refuses to support Russian initiative in UN to recognize Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam terrorist groups
    On behalf of Russia, I would ban the main terrorist group, "the mother of all groups" -NATO and recognize the main terrorist of the year- Barack Hussein Ben Obama Laden
  23. oldzek
    oldzek 12 May 2016 13: 20
    0
    nothing surprising. we remember: "yes, this is a son of a bitch, but this is our son of a bitch."
  24. Obolensky
    Obolensky 12 May 2016 13: 39
    0
    I said that the UN is a puppet theater and puppets. And the puppeteer is the United States.

    If the United States refuses to support this initiative, it means that the United States itself must be declared terrorists and ranked as terrorists!
  25. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 12 May 2016 14: 50
    0
    We must recognize the US government as a terrorist organization.