Military Review

Due to an emergency, disconnected from the network of the 3 unit of the Rivne NPP

75
Another emergency situation manifested itself at one of the Ukrainian nuclear power plants. This time, problems were identified in the cooling system of the third power unit of the nuclear power plant in the city of Rivne (RAES). Press office of the Ukrainian Energoatom reports that at about half past midnight local time, the 3 unit of the nuclear power plant was shut down:
10 May 2016 of the 00: 32 power unit No. 3 of the Rivne NPP, in accordance with the agreed operational request, is disconnected from the grid to eliminate leakages in the cooling system of the generator stator of the turbogenerator TG-5.



According to some reports, repair work will be carried out over the next seven days.

Due to an emergency, disconnected from the network of the 3 unit of the Rivne NPP


Two power units (of 4-х) with total capacity with a total load of 1380 MW remain in operation at the RNPP.

At the same time, on the second power unit of the same station, measures of the so-called average scheduled preventive maintenance are held. The reactor is assembled and steam generators are sealed. Repair work at the second power unit has been going on for over a month now.

The press service of Energoatom claims that the background radiation in the area of ​​the Rovno NPP is still in good condition (about 9 micro X-rays / h)

For reference: Rivne NPP is located in Kuznetsovsk. Commissioned in 1980 year. Reactor types: VVER-440 and VVER-1000
Photos used:
http://www.rnpp.rv.ua
75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ShturmKGB
    ShturmKGB 10 May 2016 11: 22
    +5
    It is not said which rods were used. I believe that even if Russian rods were used, the qualifications of the staff are not up to the mark!
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 10 May 2016 11: 25
      +19
      yes it's time to close all production. leave the beds and seeds to give. So that on the Khreshchatyk!

      Well, of course you can trust pigs to breed and make potbelly stoves in shipyards, too!

      So to speak, they will be more intact and their neighbors will not be affected!)

    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Conductor
      Conductor 10 May 2016 11: 28
      -2
      Fools may pass by. Title is not correct
      "On May 2016, 0.32 at 3 (time corresponds to Moscow) power unit No. 1000 (VVER-5) of Rovno NPP, in accordance with the agreed operational request, was disconnected from the power grid to eliminate leaks in the stator cooling system of the generator of the TG-XNUMX turbine generator."

      This station passed the IAEA test, which was highly rated for safety.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 10 May 2016 11: 32
        +9
        Quote: Explorer
        Fools may pass by. Title is not correct

        And I would be wary, because this station is located next to Belarus. I think one Chernobyl is enough for you.
        Or maybe in this way Ukraine wants to make the West fork out for a mat. help. In fact, the western border is also not far.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 10 May 2016 11: 50
          +7
          RBMK reactors stood at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and the explosion occurred due to an experiment and violation of all safety rules.
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 10 May 2016 12: 00
            +7
            Quote: Vadim237
            RBMK reactors stood at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and the explosion occurred due to an experiment and violation of all safety rules.

            Do you refuse to violate safety rules to Ukrainian "specialists"?
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 10 May 2016 15: 43
              0
              In Ukraine, people still have their heads and some of them are the personnel of nuclear plants.
          2. Conductor
            Conductor 10 May 2016 12: 00
            .
            This is not the point) I think the more actively Energoatom will buy and use at its stations fuel from the Japanese-American company Westinghouse instead of the Russian one; fuel is not only cheaper, but also quite successfully used at other European nuclear power plants of Soviet projects (in itself a topic for a separate conversation), the more dirt will pour on it
            1. goose
              goose 10 May 2016 12: 33
              +9
              Quote: Explorer
              fuel is not only cheaper, but it is also quite successfully used on other European nuclear power plants of Soviet projects

              1. Westinghouse does not recycle, and this at cost is not cheaper than getting the fuel itself.
              2. What are the examples of successful operation - depressurization of Westinghouse assemblies is very frequent, many times more often than Russian ones. Let me remind you - Westinghouse R&D in material science for fuel elements with uranium oxide was not carried out in the same volume as was done in the USSR, as a result of which the alloys are vulnerable to neutron swelling during prolonged irradiation.
            2. venik
              venik 10 May 2016 15: 03
              +8
              Quote: Explorer
              This is not the point) I think the more actively Energoatom will buy and use at its stations fuel from the Japanese-American company Westinghouse instead of the Russian one; fuel is not only cheaper, but also quite successfully used at other European nuclear power plants of Soviet projects (in itself a topic for a separate conversation), the more dirt will pour on it


              What are you ???
              Chernobyl alone was not enough for you ???
              For especially stupid !:
              You will not pour 98th gasoline into the Belarus tractor ... The valves will burn out!
              And in the 600th "Merin" DT, too, you will not start - it will drive worse than "Belarus"!
              What about a nuclear reactor? This is not "Belarus" and not "Merin" !!!!
              Fuel for a reactor NORMALLY can be made only by those who DESIGNED it !!!!! Because the technologies for the production of nuclear fuel are INDIVIDUAL !!!
              Copy - it is necessary to rebuild ALL enrichment technology in exact accordance with the technology of the developer !!! And this is almost IMPOSSIBLE !!!
              Otherwise - ALWAYS there is a risk that something will go wrong!
              I'm not even talking about the fact that the "Yankes" all machines are graduated in the "inch system", and in ours - in the "metric", and here every micron has a meaning!
              That is why the world practice is: WHO builds the reactor - THAT and supplies fuel !!!!!
              I apologize, but I KNOW what I'm talking about!
            3. nadezhiva
              nadezhiva 10 May 2016 15: 53
              +4
              Quote: Explorer
              Yes, that's not the point) I think ....

              And you do not think. Take a look at the statistics of this year on emergency shutdowns of nuclear power plants in Ukraine. Learn a lot. No kidding.
        2. Conductor
          Conductor 10 May 2016 11: 55
          -3
          Undoubtedly, the appearance of such news should be closely monitored, however, it is necessary to filter explicit fakes or news drawn by the ears
          1. kotvov
            kotvov 10 May 2016 12: 11
            +6
            Undoubtedly, the appearance of such news should be closely monitored, however, it is necessary to filter explicit fakes or news taken by the ears,
            I envy your confidence. You are young, you don’t remember Chernobyl. What is happening in Ukraine, you know, is annoying, including nuclear power plants.
      2. goose
        goose 10 May 2016 12: 22
        +4
        Quote: Explorer
        This station passed the IAEA test, which was highly rated for safety.

        IAEA specialists do not always have sufficient competence and tolerances for a realistic assessment of plant safety. Keep this in mind.
      3. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 10 May 2016 14: 47
        +1
        In what year was the audit? In my experience (does not include work at nuclear power plants) after the test, the most dangerous period of operation begins !!!, the staff just relax !! The check is passed, you can not strain for a while.
      4. Lelek
        Lelek 10 May 2016 18: 38
        +1
        Quote: Explorer
        This station passed the IAEA test, which was highly rated for safety.


        Means great (-) work of the IAEA. NPP is not a toy and not a "play of", it will explode - it will not seem a little to everyone around. Since 1980, nuclear power plant technologies have gone far and the "hands" of the former Ukraine need to think hard about stopping and modernizing the plants (until it is LATE).
    4. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 10 May 2016 11: 30
      +4
      Whether there will still be, the most interesting is to come.
    5. The black
      The black 10 May 2016 12: 02
      +11
      Nuclear power generation in Ukraine is becoming dangerous. Therefore, and also for internal competitive reasons, the European Union wants to CLOSE NUCLEAR PLANTS in Ukraine. For this they need a reason. The reason will be another accident. To create the prerequisites for an accident, it is necessary to introduce some "innovations" into the well-established and completely reliable technical process. That's what American fuel is needed for. The Ukrainians themselves, together with them, will create an accident - and the EU will demand the closure of "dangerous and depleted" nuclear power plants in Ukraine.
      The idiots who stand up for American fuel understand everything perfectly - they just got money from the Europeans for their own pocket for destroying the Ukrainian nuclear generation. Under the cheerful shouts and races of the Maidan. "That is not a jump, that m.s.k.a.l.l."!

      At the same time, the Americans themselves at the level of the State Department with the hands of their Ukrainian puppets want to ruin the Ukrainian nuclear power plants, and they will be especially happy if this happens with bright accidents. The purpose of these actions is to get a poor embittered population. That, in turn, is necessary (paradoxical as it sounds) to make it easier to set a zombie mass of Bandera against Russia.
      1. Conductor
        Conductor 10 May 2016 12: 14
        .
        With modern security systems, it will be extremely difficult to implement, even on purpose. Nobody except for fans of conspiracy theory needs such a catastrophe.
    6. fennekRUS
      fennekRUS 10 May 2016 12: 13
      +1
      ShturmKGB
      It is not said which rods were used

      What do the rods have to do with it? This is a turbine generator. The generator's cooling system has nothing to do with nuclear fuel at all. Moreover, the generating capacities are shut down, and the reactor of the block itself is most likely "feeding" steam to TG-2, since the "boiler" of the 2nd block has been brought out to the PPR. The news is about nothing, from the category - "ticklish headline"
    7. atalef
      atalef 10 May 2016 12: 19
      -1
      ShturmKGB
      It is not said which rods were used. I believe that even if Russian rods were used, the qualifications of the staff are not up to the mark!

      What does the rod have to do with? It is a generator stator. The generator is cooled by hydrogen.
      absolutely ordinary fault for any station
      1. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 10 May 2016 16: 02
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        ShturmKGB
        It is not said which rods were used. I believe that even if Russian rods were used, the qualifications of the staff are not up to the mark!

        What does the rod have to do with? It is a generator stator. The generator is cooled by hydrogen.
        absolutely ordinary fault for any station

        The United States imposed the rods on what it placed in power as a result of the coup, to use their fuel rods, which are not only more expensive than Russian, but also not suitable for Soviet nuclear power plants, which was proved as a result of experiments in Eastern Europe and Ukraine, more than once, almost led to disasters. Their fuel in our reactors behaves unstably, overheats and leads to very serious emergency situations.
        1. atalef
          atalef 10 May 2016 16: 11
          +1
          Quote: Skifotavr
          The core here is that the United States imposed on what

          The rods have nothing to do with mk in this reactor shutdown did not play any role, either direct or indirect
          Quote: Skifotavr
          what it put in power as a result of the coup, to use their fuel rods, which are not only more expensive than Russian, but also not suitable for Soviet nuclear power plants, which was proved as a result of experiments in Eastern Europe and the same Ukraine and more than once led to disasters.

          When and where ?
          Quote: Skifotavr
          Their fuel in our reactors behaves unstably, overheats and leads to very serious emergency situations.

          Those you want to say that Iran is able to produce nuclear weapons to the Soviet reactor, and Westinghouse - not?
          1. Skifotavr
            Skifotavr 10 May 2016 21: 44
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            When and where ?

            For example, here are 3 articles, and one on the same site:
            http://topwar.ru/85751-atomomor-ukrainy-priblizhaet-ee-konec.html
            http://riafan.ru/402722-moskva-ispolzovanie-amerikanskogo-topliva-na-aes-ukrainy
            i-krayne-opasno
            http://flb.ru/info/57871.html
          2. venik
            venik 15 May 2016 22: 14
            0
            [quote = atalef] [quote = Skifotavr]
            You want to say that Iran is able to produce nuclear weapons to the Soviet reactor, and Westinghouse is not? [/ Quote]

            Of course, if, of course, Iran enriches uranium using Russian technologies and from Russian raw materials !!!
      2. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 10 May 2016 16: 06
        0
        By the way, where does it say that we are talking about the "generator stator"? wink
        1. atalef
          atalef 10 May 2016 16: 43
          +2
          Quote: Skifotavr
          By the way, where does it say that we are talking about the "generator stator"? wink

          how about reading an article?
          May 10, 2016 at 00:32, power unit No. 3 of the Rivne NPP, in accordance with the agreed operational application, is disconnected from the grid to eliminate leaks in the generator stator cooling system TG-5 turbogenerator.
          1. Skifotavr
            Skifotavr 10 May 2016 21: 02
            +1
            Quote: atalef

            how about reading an article?
            May 10, 2016 at 00:32, power unit No. 3 of the Rivne NPP, in accordance with the agreed operational application, is disconnected from the grid to eliminate leaks in the generator stator cooling system TG-5 turbogenerator.

            Hmm, I didn’t notice, I admit smile
    8. NordUral
      NordUral 10 May 2016 12: 21
      +2
      In this case, they have nothing to do with the other emergency situations. Svidomye jump.
    9. Skifotavr
      Skifotavr 10 May 2016 15: 54
      +2
      ShturmKGB
      It is not said which rods were used. I believe that even if Russian rods were used, the qualifications of the staff are not up to the mark!

      I also thought: isn’t free-democratic fuel naughty again? winked Shitty just nuclear power plants on Shche Ne Vmerloi remained not only in the west.
    10. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 10 May 2016 16: 54
      +2
      If only it didn’t explode ...
    11. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 11 May 2016 14: 27
      0
      What do the rods have to do with it? Such situations around the world almost weekly .. It’s dangerous, of course, when hydrogen escapes from the generator’s cooling system, but this does not apply to the reactor.
  2. silver169
    silver169 10 May 2016 11: 25
    +9
    The logical result of the disregard for the Kiev junta to the country's nuclear energy.
    1. just exp
      just exp 10 May 2016 11: 36
      +15
      so they and the people laid. the result - kakly really eat hedgehogs, in general, when Smykarevich lied about eating hedgehogs in Russia, he lied only about being eaten in Russia.
      if so judge everything that kakly talk about Russia, they take it from themselves.
      1. crumb
        crumb 10 May 2016 14: 20
        0
        I'm in shock, no, well, honestly in shock! recourse
      2. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 10 May 2016 21: 11
        0
        Quote: just EXPL
        so they and the people laid. the result - kakly really eat hedgehogs, in general, when Smykarevich lied about eating hedgehogs in Russia, he lied only about being eaten in Russia.
        if so judge everything that kakly talk about Russia, they take it from themselves.

        By the way, about hedgehogs. Many have heard that the first in Europe (and possibly the world) in terms of the incidence of tuberculosis, but not many people know it and the hedgehogs are its carriers. We have them all over the sea, but now I bypass their tenth way from sin away.
    2. atalef
      atalef 10 May 2016 21: 08
      -2
      Quote: silver169
      The logical result of the disregard for the Kiev junta to the country's nuclear energy.

      Read the article - this is a planned (and not an emergency stop), to eliminate the usual and often encountered problems.
      Quote: atalef
      May 0, 2016 at 00:32 power unit No. 3 of the Rivne NPP, in accordance with the agreed operational applicationdisconnected from the power grid to eliminate leaks in the cooling system of the stator of the generator of the turbogenerator TG-
  3. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 10 May 2016 11: 26
    +9
    Judging by how Ukrainians like to jump on a rake, until they arrange a second Chernobyl, they will not calm down
  4. nizrum
    nizrum 10 May 2016 11: 36
    +6
    Along the way, the Ukrainian nuclear program is being phased out.
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 10 May 2016 12: 31
      +1
      Quote: nizrum
      Along the way, the Ukrainian nuclear program is being phased out.

      Yes, the scribe is somewhere on the road how close it is still difficult to say (all of a sudden their European brothers will update their stations), but if the structures are 30 or more years old, then this is serious.
  5. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 10 May 2016 11: 36
    +5
    This phrase is very alarming: "Another emergency has proved itself at one of the Ukrainian nuclear power plants". Are accidents at nuclear power plants already the norm in Ukraine? It's good that it's not at the reactor:" leaks in the cooling system stator of a generator of a turbogenerator TG-5... The press service of Energoatom claims that the radiation background in the area of ​​the Rovno NPP is still in a normal state (about 9 micro-roentgen / h). "The thought that it will be even worse is straining.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 10 May 2016 11: 59
      +5
      Quote: LÄRZ
      Accidents at nuclear power plants are already the norm in Ukraine?

      Recently, they have been frequenting something, before that the Zaporizhzhya NPP periodically differed in emergency situations in the South Ukraine, too, there was an accident this winter, and now Rovnenskaya.
      Progressive wear and tear of equipment and experiments with nuclear fuel are a bad combination. It will not end in good.
      1. LÄRZ
        LÄRZ 10 May 2016 12: 11
        +2
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Progressive wear and tear of equipment and experiments with nuclear fuel are a bad combination. It will not end in good.

        I agree. In addition to all this, for sure, there is a lack of operating specialists (the same trouble as we have). Those who worked are already retired, and there are few young people, there is no one to pass on their experience. Here are the beginners and "reinvent the wheel" through experiments with nuclear power plants.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 10 May 2016 12: 41
          0
          Quote: LÄRZ
          ... Here are the beginners and "reinvent the wheel" through experiments with nuclear power plants.

          Nobody invents anything there - there are regulations for all operations. The problem lies in the maniacal desire of the Ukrainian authorities to get rid of their dependence on the sworn mos ... th (and the "aggressor company" Rosatom as well) in all spheres.
          Those. They also have technical support, as they believe, should be "independent", with all that it implies, and the service personnel have nothing to do with it - they don't tweak the details and they don't even think of putting an uncertified fuel assembly into the reactor.
    2. goose
      goose 10 May 2016 12: 44
      +1
      Quote: LÄRZ
      the radiation background in the area of ​​the Rivne NPP is still in a normal state (about 9 micro-roentgen / h) ".

      The normal background near the coal opencasts and along the roads where the coal is carried is actually about 40 mcr / h. If the city stands on the old mountains, granite, there are radon outlets, then the background in the city is no less, and even more, up to 100-130 mcr / h.
      Normal background in the steppe, without human intervention, about 3-4 mcr / hour. It is a perfectly clean place. Therefore, at 9 mcr / h, the station is somehow not believed, especially in the area of ​​the storage and reactor halls. It is necessary to choose a particularly purged place on the territory of the NPP, but then we are not talking about the territory of the NPP itself. This is actually data from the surrounding area.
  6. Wiruz
    Wiruz 10 May 2016 11: 37
    +6
    elimination of leaks in the cooling system of the stator of the generator of the TG-5 turbogenerator.

    As a turbine equipment crawler, I’ll say that there is nothing serious here. Damage to the reactor has nothing to do. Although, if the cooling is hydrogen, it could have fallen.
    You just need to understand that not all accidents at nuclear power plants are associated with reactors, which means that not all can lead to radiation contamination bully
    1. atalef
      atalef 10 May 2016 12: 23
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      As a turbine equipment crawler, I’ll say that there is nothing serious here. Damage to the reactor has nothing to do. Although, if the cooling is hydrogen, it could have fallen.
      You just need to understand that not all accidents at nuclear power plants are associated with reactors, which means that not all can lead to radiation contamination

      I absolutely agree with you, ordinary failure.
      even when considering hydrogen cooling
  7. demiurg
    demiurg 10 May 2016 11: 40
    +18
    Quote: Sveik
    How do you all know what happened there? If only tongue scratching for likes, I swear. A shame.


    Any incident at any nuclear power plant is world news. And in / in Ukraine this is so, a common thing lately. And it does not matter whose assemblies, ours or American. The very fact of the next emergency load relief from nuclear power plants is a global emergency. Would you be pleased with the news if you were told that a 100-ton mercury tank was dropped in your city, but it did not spill? After all, it seems nothing happened. And then every two to three months, the repetition of such news? There is no reason to beware?
  8. demiurg
    demiurg 10 May 2016 11: 46
    +7
    Quote: Wiruz
    elimination of leaks in the cooling system of the stator of the generator of the TG-5 turbogenerator.

    As a turbine equipment crawler, I’ll say that there is nothing serious here. Damage to the reactor has nothing to do. Although, if the cooling is hydrogen, it could have fallen.
    You just need to understand that not all accidents at nuclear power plants are associated with reactors, which means that not all can lead to radiation contamination bully


    The generator will jump off the load, the hydrogen wedge will stop holding, the blade will break off on the turbine, even just, the transformer will run out of power, there’s nowhere to put energy in, are you sure there will be enough staff to emergency shut down the reactor? What will the whole relay work as it should, so that all emergency pumps are operational? This is not Russia in the 90s, in the 90s in Russia there were still trained engineers and technicians.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 10 May 2016 12: 08
      +1
      The generator will jump off the load, the hydrogen wedge will stop holding, the blade will break off on the turbine, even just, the transformer will run out of power, there’s nowhere to put energy in, are you sure there will be enough staff to emergency shut down the reactor? What will the whole relay work as it should, so that all emergency pumps are operational?

      This happens, and, alas, often. And it doesn’t matter at a pulverized coal-fired power plant or nuclear power plant. Although, I agree, urgently extinguishing the boiler is much easier and safer than shutting down the reactor.
      1. atalef
        atalef 10 May 2016 12: 27
        0
        Quote: Wiruz
        The generator will jump off the load, the hydrogen wedge will stop holding, the blade will break off on the turbine, even just, the transformer will run out of power, there’s nowhere to put energy in, are you sure there will be enough staff to emergency shut down the reactor?

        there is an automatic discharge of steam through the valves, everything is paired, howlers roar, people are running. the automation introduces rods laughing
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 10 May 2016 12: 59
          +1
          there is an automatic discharge of steam through the valves, everything is paired, howlers howl, people run.

          Oooh ... don't remind wassat
      2. goose
        goose 10 May 2016 12: 49
        +3
        Quote: Wiruz
        extinguishing the boiler is much simpler and safer than shutting down the reactor

        Alas, the Chernobyl incident happened while trying to shut down the reactor with great reactivity, ignorantly and quickly. Those. direct lack of qualifications. And this is in Soviet times, when the average level and number of personnel was different.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 May 2016 11: 47
    +8
    This is still affecting the general wear and tear of the equipment. Seals, piping, etc. Fortunately, this is not a reactor yet. This is a general decline in the production culture and underfunding of PPR, lack of spare parts, not on time ordered and paid parts, and other slovenliness. The symptom is alarming. Such systematic "errors" tend to accumulate, followed by a "quality transition". To Chernobyl ...
  10. CORNET
    CORNET 10 May 2016 11: 49
    +7
    The farther, the worse ... The nuclear power plants are not aircraft and tank factories, you just cannot plunder, it is fraught with serious consequences! Relations with Russia are broken, and it was developed with us .. The horses are bloody! am
  11. Stabilization
    Stabilization 10 May 2016 11: 53
    +3
    Yes, why does the new Ukraine need electricity) it is necessary to close all stations ..
    1. Cananecat
      Cananecat 10 May 2016 12: 06
      0
      That's right, let everyone sow peas and produce hydrogen sulfide.
  12. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 10 May 2016 11: 59
    +1
    Entrust the fool ... I will break the glass pound or lose it!
  13. vadimtt
    vadimtt 10 May 2016 12: 06
    0
    A bit provocative article. "... background radiation ... while is in good condition " laughing
    As for the generator, the cooling there is exactly hydrogen; it has not been directly related to the reactor, as already mentioned.
    Everyone unsubscribing for the reasons of the Chernobyl accident is a failure for knowledge.
  14. demiurg
    demiurg 10 May 2016 12: 08
    +2
    There is such a law, in the West it’s called Murphy’s law, we have the law of a sandwich.

    1. If trouble can happen, it happens.
    2. If there can be several troubles, they will happen all, in the most unpleasant sequence.

    Given the experiments on old reactors, with load, assemblies, dubious staff qualifications and incomprehensible maintenance, you really need to think something, right down to the landing, which completely shuts down the reactors. Moreover, let the Sarmatians and Teutons think along with us, they will also get it.
    1. LÄRZ
      LÄRZ 10 May 2016 12: 18
      +1
      Quote: demiurg
      1. If trouble can happen, it happens.
      2. If there can be several troubles, they will happen all, in the most unpleasant sequence.

      If the problem has a solution, then there is no need to worry, if there is no solution, then there is no point in worrying.
  15. Arkan
    Arkan 10 May 2016 12: 15
    +1
    Ukrainian NPPs are deteriorating, becoming, if the worn out power units are not decommissioned in time, into dirty bombs.
  16. HAM
    HAM 10 May 2016 12: 16
    +4
    South Ukrainian stands, Zaporozhye is also completely stands (2% of capacity is used), now Rivne began to "leave" for preventive maintenance in parts, there is only Khmelnitsky NPP left, BUT, I THINK, IT WILL NOT BE LONG LIKE.
  17. Grabberxnumx
    Grabberxnumx 10 May 2016 12: 33
    +3
    Question to power engineers: is this normal, what if 15 reactors in 5 country are already installed?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  18. tsvetkov1274
    tsvetkov1274 10 May 2016 12: 54
    0
    Call S. Lavrov ... fool
  19. demiurg
    demiurg 10 May 2016 13: 19
    +4
    Quote: atalef

    there is an automatic discharge of steam through the valves, everything is paired, howlers roar, people are running. the automation introduces rods laughing


    What opuv howlers, who will hear them? Steam from boilers directly flies into the atmosphere. For 2-3km you have to speak raising your voice. Everyone who sat and pushed in the toilets at the power plant experienced sudden relief. I worked on the territory of the thermal power station, when the generator flew off the load, only the sound is worse when you work behind the flags on the input machines, while the generator on duty decides to check their operability. Jump 3 meters down with a half turn and a tool bag? Easy.
    Okay, the generator with the turbine will gradually brake without load in 3-4-5 hours.
    Are you sure the correct protection automatics work? What will emergency pumps start chasing water?
    1. atalef
      atalef 10 May 2016 13: 45
      +3
      Quote: demiurg
      Steam from boilers directly flies into the atmosphere. For 2-3km you have to speak raising your voice. Everyone who was sitting and pushing in the toilets at the power plant experienced sudden relief

      everything is correct, and now imagine when, after an accident, 2 generators fly out on the main busbar assemblies of the substation, and then another 2 - 4 boilers fly out due to overloading No.
  20. Zomanus
    Zomanus 10 May 2016 13: 47
    0
    Yes, just like you don’t patch up the Soviet legacy,
    with its space reserves for reliability,
    depreciation and reliability are inevitable.
    It is just aging, fraying.
  21. demiurg
    demiurg 10 May 2016 14: 12
    +1
    Quote: atalef

    everything is correct, and now imagine when, after an accident, 2 generators fly out on the main busbar assemblies of the substation, and then another 2 - 4 boilers fly out due to overloading No.

    Why imagine? If the generator crashes, or, even better, the output transformer, the line breaks by causal techniques, then all the steam of the power plant that does not go for heating flies into the air.
    I heard it over 700-900 meters. 1.08 GW, 6 to 180 MW BP of TPP-5 in Novosibirsk (for some reason, there are other data on the Internet). Very impressed. The first 5-7 minutes simply could not speak. Although it was in the summer, most likely the CHP did not operate 100%.
    1. atalef
      atalef 10 May 2016 14: 22
      -1
      Quote: demiurg
      1.08 GW, 6 at 180 MW BPHP-5 in

      2 to 375 and 2 to 250 laughing
  22. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 11 May 2016 07: 10
    0
    Quote: Explorer
    This station passed the IAEA test, which was highly rated for safety.


    One gets the impression that the IAEA started a monstrous experiment (pah, pah), under the slogan of joining the sanctions against Russia. A high rating of the Security Level most likely indicates only the efficiency of the automation and the level of staff readiness.