The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks

106
On the day of the 5 anniversary of the liquidation of Bin Laden’s No. 1 terrorist, accused by Washington of 11.09.2001 terrorist attacks, CIA head John Brennan was interviewed on NBC, the agency reports Ридус.



The main idea that during the interview the CIA chief tried to convey to the public was that Saudi Arabia was not involved in the 2001 terrorist attacks in

At the same time, he said that the secret part of the report on the terrorist attacks, which Senator Kirsten Gillibrand requested to publish, will not be made public, as it contained only the initial conclusions of congressmen based on poorly verified data.

“Subsequently, the issues raised in it (in the report) were fully investigated and examined by the commission of inquiry into the terrorist attack 9 / 11,” Brennan said.

“They (commission members) made a very clear statement that there was no evidence that indicated that the Saudi government as a whole or Saudi officials individually provided financial support to al-Qaeda,” he said.

Earlier, Riyadh said that in the event of the publication of the report, he would sell off his assets in the United States, whose value is estimated at nearly a trillion dollars.

Commenting on the situation, Vladimir Kireev, an expert of the People’s Diplomacy Foundation, noted that “in order to preserve the friendship of the States with the Saudis, with which they can influence world oil pricing, American leaders are ready to renounce justice completely.”

Washington, as always, is trying to impose its own, profitable version on the world. In this case, the version that only Bin Laden is to blame for the terrorist attacks.

“But many people are not fools at all, and they understand that if they persistently introduce information about one thing, but at the same time hide information about another, then the matter is not clear,” said Kireev.
106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    2 May 2016 13: 50
    All the same, they were afraid that the Saudis would withdraw $ 750 billion, and at the same time they were afraid to scare other creditors.
    1. +13
      2 May 2016 13: 58
      As a prostitute, "I know I know but I WILL NOT SAY ANYTHING"
      1. +39
        2 May 2016 14: 34
        Ha! And what is there to declassify something ?! fool laughing
        And so it is clear that this was, as always, the political provocation of Washington, and its executors were the CIA and the Pentagon!
        1. +14
          2 May 2016 14: 44
          Instructions for digesting Yankees noodles are for European listeners and other licking public. Americans don’t even bother to make nonsense at least a little believable, and so they will devour the wretched. am
          1. +8
            2 May 2016 16: 23
            But the ears of the CIA are seen by the Saudis, which they are afraid of.
            1. +9
              2 May 2016 19: 02
              And on the thief and the hat is burning !!! And to arrange such a scam, this is terrorism against your country, and they don’t want to declassify !!!
              1. +6
                2 May 2016 19: 48
                Quote: Snake AAA
                And on the thief and the hat is burning !!! And to arrange such a scam, this is terrorism against your country, and they don’t want to declassify !!!


                This is not just terrorism against their country, it will be worse if it comes to the people, who, whom and most importantly for what?
                1. +2
                  2 May 2016 20: 08
                  And where did you see the people there ??? I saw a degenerate herd, but THIS cannot be called the people ..
                  Quote: cniza
                  Quote: Snake AAA
                  And on the thief and the hat is burning !!! And to arrange such a scam, this is terrorism against your country, and they don’t want to declassify !!!


                  This is not just terrorism against their country, it will be worse if it comes to the people, who, whom and most importantly for what?
              2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +13
          2 May 2016 15: 26
          Quote: Tatiana
          Ha! And what is there to declassify something ?!

          sad
          14: 36 02.05.2016
          http://ria.ru/world/20160502/1424838039.html
          German media released secret documents by agreement between the US and the EU
          MOSCOW, May 2 - RIA Novosti. The United States puts much more serious pressure on the European Union in the negotiations on the so-called Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) than previously thought, the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung writes, citing secret documents provided by Greenpeace.
          In particular, Washington is threatening to cut back on car imports from EU countries if the EU refuses to buy more American agricultural products.
          At the same time, the United States expressed dissatisfaction with the policies of the European Consumer Center, which opposes the distribution in Europe of genetically modified foods and meat with hormones.
          Washington requires that bans on certain products only apply if their harm to human health has been scientifically proven.
          Prior to the publication of these documents, both sides of the negotiations openly stated that the United States respected the fears of Europeans, but now the picture is completely different, the newspaper writes.
          The EU bans such products even at minimal risk, the United States - only if someone has already suffered as a result of their use, the German newspaper said.
          "A close examination of the documents showed that almost all the fears associated with the US intentions in the TTIP in relation to the food market proved to be justified," says Klaus Schulz, chairman of the Federation of German Consumer Organizations.
          The documents also shed light on the disagreements of the parties regarding legal interaction and legislative regulation. The US wants to seriously limit the influence of European lawmakers regarding economic decision-making.
          From the point of view of experts, this can cause serious damage to the environmental situation in the EU. Süddeutsche Zeitung gives the following example: in the European Union, 1382 different chemicals are forbidden in the manufacture of cosmetics, only 11 in the USA.
          "What the public was able to learn from these secret negotiations before it seemed like a nightmare. We now know that this could soon become a reality," commented Jürgen Knirsch, Greenpeace trade expert.
          Süddeutsche Zeitung notes that, thanks to these documents, the public can learn for the first time in three years how negotiations on a trade agreement between the US and the EU took place. Before that, they only had to make assumptions.
        4. +4
          2 May 2016 17: 34
          For a long time I suspected something like that, but it always seemed terribly cynical and to the end I could not believe it
      2. +4
        2 May 2016 15: 27
        She doesn’t want to testify against herself? smile They procrastinate so much, I don’t need the CIA anymore to understand that the Saudis, together with the US authorities, are involved
    2. +52
      2 May 2016 14: 05
      “But so many people are not stupid at all, and understand that if they insistently introduce information about one thing, but at the same time hide the information about another, then the matter is not clear”,

      Of course not clean. request
      1. +3
        2 May 2016 14: 21
        Washington, as always, is trying to impose its own, profitable version on the world. In this case, the version that only Bin Laden is to blame for the terrorist attacks.

        Well done, Benya-Laden! One, he personally drove several aircraft AND HAS ALREADY BEEN AND HIDED!
        Hmmm, American "noodles" do not stand up to scrutiny!
      2. +2
        2 May 2016 21: 40
        Reincarnation of "Lusitania"
    3. +1
      2 May 2016 14: 12
      C'mon, everyone knows everything already.

      The Saudis blew up, and Iraq was punished.

      Because the Saudis sidekick, well, think of it, they dumped a couple of houses, they’ll build new ones, higher than the previous ones.
      1. +23
        2 May 2016 14: 30
        The houses were insured
        Insurance llamas received - get off with your dirty suspicions
        There is an official report
        The same official was in the JFK murder case

        FBI and CIA are never wrong, and all Congressional Commissions confirm this

        (better to keep silent about sarcasm)
        1. +1
          3 May 2016 09: 18
          Quote: Very old
          never make a mistake

          Lonely Oswald shot JFK, then loner Ruby shot Oswald, then the third loner himself injected something like this in the hospital, which caused a pulmonary embolism; and they have no number - the facts, how some "loners" clean up other "loners". In short, a continuous "100 years of solitude", like GG Marquez.
        2. +2
          3 May 2016 09: 18
          Quote: Very old
          never make a mistake

          Lonely Oswald shot JFK, then loner Ruby shot Oswald, then the third loner himself injected something like this in the hospital, which caused a pulmonary embolism; and they have no number - the facts, how some "loners" clean up other "loners". In short, a continuous "100 years of solitude", like GG Marquez.
    4. +16
      2 May 2016 14: 14
      Yes, this is precisely what the United States is not afraid of - accounts can simply be arrested (under sanctions). Just what money the militants (including ISIS) will then fight.
      It's just that no one will investigate "events dangerous for the investigation" - both these and others (the explosion of the battleship "MEN" and many others).
      Otherwise, you still have to come up with answers to the questions: where did the gold from the basements of the towers go, where did the liner that got to the Pentagon and many others go ...
      US executives are not suicides
      1. +8
        2 May 2016 14: 40
        Russia is "deeply concerned" with such a cunning response from the State Department ...
        Where is Putin’s hand .. ??? We are already used and very disappointed .... Maybe Putin is all the same, but gentlemen? laughing wassat
    5. +2
      2 May 2016 14: 40
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      All the same, they were afraid that the Saudis would withdraw $ 750 billion, and at the same time they were afraid to scare other creditors.

      somehow resonates with Odessa on May 2, when the information was about the removal of corpses in bags, 40 people are one bus, they killed everyone, not enough for such a building
      At the same time, he said that the secret part of the report on the terrorist attacks, which Senator Kirsten Gillibrand requested to publish, will not be made public, as it contained only the initial conclusions of congressmen based on poorly verified data.
    6. Dam
      +4
      2 May 2016 16: 09
      It’s very stupid to spread incriminating evidence into open access.
    7. +1
      2 May 2016 16: 20
      The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks

      By the fact that the stigma in the gun!
    8. 0
      2 May 2016 19: 10
      Quote: Sith Lord
      All the same, they were afraid that the Saudis would withdraw $ 750 billion, and at the same time they were afraid to scare other creditors.

      -----------------
      All the same, they were afraid of a quasi-state called Saudi Arabia. "The strongest democratic state with the most powerful army" crap blamed the closest vassal with a medieval lifestyle, underground alcohol and semi-legal prostitutes. The ears of Saudi Arabia stick out literally behind any radical Islamist antics.
    9. 0
      3 May 2016 00: 34
      The Saudis have nothing to do with it. A common trick to delay the publicity of real events. It is not even possible to imagine what will happen if ordinary Americans find out the whole truth about the "twins".
    10. +1
      3 May 2016 03: 10
      And they are afraid that it will finally reach everyone that there were not a single Iraqi or a single Afghan among the terrorists.
    11. +2
      3 May 2016 21: 55
      The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks

      The smoked leader of the Macington macaques simply scared the Saudis. And then what to declassify? Western journalists have long declassified everything in dozens of books and documentaries in the first three years. There are interesting photos on the internet.
      One fact that a few weeks before the event the buildings were resold and within 24 hours were insured in XNUMX companies, the movement in the stock markets, the lack of evidence of the "attack" by the "Boeing" of the Pentagon, the disappearance of a female FBI agent who reported strange Arabs who refused to learn to land plane, video, in which the Arabs did not pass face control at the airport, but still ended up on the plane - what else do you need?
  2. +1
    2 May 2016 13: 52
    For grandmas they sell their people.
    1. +1
      2 May 2016 21: 53
      Quote: Spartanez300
      For grandmas they sell their people.

      The hand washes the hand.
  3. +1
    2 May 2016 13: 57
    The tail wags the dog ...
  4. 0
    2 May 2016 13: 58
    Of course, why should they shoot their own special services, it is better to blame them on uninvited Iran and demand monetary compensation, the Saudis backed out, promising to merge amer’s assets
  5. +3
    2 May 2016 13: 58
    The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks
    This phrase reminded me of a line from the song of the group Mango-Mango:
    "...- we have SUCH! devices-
    but we won't tell you about them ... " lol
  6. +10
    2 May 2016 14: 00
    Oil painting! If declassified there will be a domino effect! The main thing is that world terrorism is a product of the United States, like Nazism, too, these two things were created by the United States, but each of them at one time got out of their control, no one canceled the theory of world-controlled chaos, only Russia (USSR) rises over and over they are saved and saved by the world, in their view, peace and silence should be in the United States, the rest should play the roles assigned to them by everyone.
  7. aba
    +1
    2 May 2016 14: 04
    Even the photo shows that whistles without a twinge of conscience!
    Although the Americans probably have no such word.
  8. +5
    2 May 2016 14: 07
    The CIA developed this attack, and carried it out with the wrong hands, that’s why it was kept secret. I'm afraid that we will never know the truth, as long as this adder called the USA exists!
    1. +4
      2 May 2016 15: 02
      Quote: Starik72
      this adder called usa

      The adder is so cute. I would call it more civilized - serpentarium.
    2. +5
      2 May 2016 16: 05
      Quote: Starik72
      The CIA developed this attack, and carried it out with the wrong hands

      Yeah ... strangers ... something these hands were very, very skilled !!! belay

      It was a filigree prepared controlled demolition (explosion) ...

      And just before that, the owners of the building insured these turrets for a tidy sum ... I understand, the "pitichka" on the site ... guessed laughing what gentlemen need, necessary ... laughing
      1. aba
        0
        2 May 2016 23: 38
        It was a filigree prepared controlled demolition (explosion) ...

        What is filigree? Three nuclear weapons under the foundations of the WTC buildings.
        Search "Third Truth" Dmitry Khalezov
        A rather interesting version, especially the design of the WTC towers is painted in detail there.
  9. +5
    2 May 2016 14: 07
    "In order to maintain the friendship of the States with the Saudis, with the help of which they can influence the world pricing of oil, American leaders are ready to comprehensively compromise with justice."

    Not for the first time? States and justice is a decent joke on April 1st.
    1. +4
      2 May 2016 14: 25
      Loginovich! 14.07/9. Why a joke? They just have their own concept of justice. Here, in terms of their concepts, they play. All other concepts are unfair to them. By event 1-1-XNUMX, the United States achieved its goal. And this is fair in their opinion. The corral of the world in the Middle Ages is also justice for them. And for such justice they stand by the mountain!
      1. +2
        2 May 2016 14: 59
        Quote: Region 34
        Here, in terms of their concepts, they play.

        That's exactly what the concepts are, Regi. They are increasingly reminiscent of our mower.
    2. +2
      2 May 2016 21: 39
      Quote: loginovich
      States and justice is a decent joke on April 1st.


      Justice - everyone has their own ... Remember the tale of a lion and 9 hyenas, as a lion divided 10 cows wink If you forgot, I remind you:
      A lion threw a cow to hyenas and commented:
      “There are ten of you now!”
      9 cows he pulled to himself and said:
      “And there are ten of us now!” THIS IS TRUE?!
      Not a single hyena objected ... laughing
    3. +1
      2 May 2016 21: 39
      Quote: loginovich
      States and justice is a decent joke on April 1st.


      Justice - everyone has their own ... Remember the tale of a lion and 9 hyenas, as a lion divided 10 cows wink If you forgot, I remind you:
      A lion threw a cow to hyenas and commented:
      “There are ten of you now!”
      9 cows he pulled to himself and said:
      “And there are ten of us now!” THIS IS TRUE?!
      Not a single hyena objected ... laughing
  10. +3
    2 May 2016 14: 08
    But Russia also has considerable assets in the United States. Maybe we should also threaten something? You see, the sanctions will be lifted. Although no, it will not work. The Saudis have no Central Bank, but we do.
    1. +2
      2 May 2016 20: 16
      Quote: Mikhail M
      But Russia also has considerable assets in the United States. Maybe we should also threaten something? You see, the sanctions will be lifted. Although no, it will not work. The Saudis have no Central Bank, but we do.

      This circumstance seems strange to me, they announced sanctions to us and refused loans, money, while we continue to keep hundreds of billions of dollars in the treasuries of the USA and Europe! Somehow it’s not logical! How painful is the issue for the United States with treasuries, we saw this with the example of Saudi Arabia, because the United States reacted sharply to this.
  11. +1
    2 May 2016 14: 12
    Earlier, Riyadh said that in the event of the publication of the report, he would sell off his assets in the United States, whose value is estimated at nearly a trillion dollars.


    Since they are afraid to declassify, then there is something to hide. And they hide their unsightly activities, to cover terrorists what is the point?
    1. +6
      2 May 2016 14: 49
      Quote: Sergei Medvedev

      Since they are afraid to declassify, then there is something to hide. And they hide their unsightly activities, to cover terrorists what is the point?

      Tired of reading this stately nonsense. It would be better if they had stopped talking, they would have looked smarter. This is preparation for a war in the Middle East, for the redistribution of the energy market. This is a reference to the prehistory of the conflict. Having happily bogged down in the Afghan conflict, the Americans bring in 2003 "democracy to Iraq" .Well, then it went, went: Iran, Libya, Syria. So if now the results of the investigation are made public, not only the "donkey" of the Democrats, but also the "elephant" of the Republicans will come out
      http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/850028
      http://www.heraldicum.ru/usa/party.htm
      1. +5
        2 May 2016 16: 51
        Amurets! 14.49. I must say, the United States with a minimum number of troops (on its side) is fighting very effectively. With a minimum of armed forces to drive countries into the Stone Age !!! Then these troops, comparable to the number of police forces, leave in the country. And also very effective. In the event of a rebellion, this police army thinks it will crush the rebels. Although in the struggle for survival, rebellion is unlikely. And so the warriors with their atrocities scare the population. Therefore, the failure of the Amer operation in Afghanistan is not worth talking about. The operation was very successful. The country is reliably sent to the Stone Age. Mission accomplished! Trade? And when trading with a backward country, the goods of this country will be expensive? USA is a plus on all fronts! hi
        1. 0
          3 May 2016 22: 17
          Quote: Region 34
          And so the warriors with their atrocities scare the population. Therefore, the failure of the Amer operation in Afghanistan is not worth talking about. The operation was very successful. The country is reliably sent to the Stone Age. Mission accomplished!

          what kind of nonsense, when was this Afghan not living in the Stone Age? Naturally disastrous campaign, and even in the absence of serious players.
  12. +2
    2 May 2016 14: 13
    So really something IS!
    1. +1
      2 May 2016 14: 52
      Why SOMETHING? As stated in one similar case: SILENT, EVERYTHING IS THE SAME WHAT THEY SHOUT. All the versions that they are so afraid to voice are all POSSIBLE. From these fighters for "democracy and justice throughout the world" any meanness will become.
  13. 0
    2 May 2016 14: 19
    "They (the commissioners) made a very clear judgment that there was no evidence to indicate that the Saudi government in general, or Saudi officials individually, provided financial support to Al Qaeda," he said.

    And they did not check the actions of those same individuals as private ones? Is Osama himself not from the ruling family?
    1. +1
      2 May 2016 14: 48
      And the Saudis elegantly spread their legs to the amers and smeared the skipedar in one place, and here the running started belay laughing
  14. +3
    2 May 2016 14: 26
    The USA is Hollywood, from start to finish.
  15. +4
    2 May 2016 14: 36
    Dark water in the field. We will not say anything, again the sensation is blown out like a soap bubble. Such forces should be involved there, so that any witnesses will be stacked in stacks, and any documents burned three times, and the ashes scattered over the ocean. According to the law of large numbers, it is IMPOSSIBLE to keep secret operations in which a significant number of people are employed. Even (as the Snowden case showed) in such a tightly classified organization as the CIA. Therefore, there is no direct evidence of Saudi involvement in the September 11 terrorist attack. And attempts to blackmail them with sanctions are even more dangerous for the hegemon than against Russia.
  16. +2
    2 May 2016 14: 41
    Obviously, the United States has very important data that can ruin the image of Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, why did the CA use financial leverage to prevent this initiative.
    I will add. Taliban-> Al-Qaeda-> ISIS (may have missed something). These are all brands. Like Coca Cola, for example. The founders of the World Terrorism brand periodically rebrand. And this can go on indefinitely as long as the war brings in income.
  17. +5
    2 May 2016 14: 50
    the secret part of the terrorist attack requested by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand

    Do we need it? Still lie. In addition to the secret part of the report, there is probably and forever classified (or maybe destroyed) data on actual customers and executors of the attack.
  18. +2
    2 May 2016 14: 57
    Lies to the whole world and on all channels, but the truth is classified as "top secret" and without a statute of limitations.
  19. +1
    2 May 2016 15: 07
    Who would doubt that :(
  20. +1
    2 May 2016 15: 18
    The United States is the "defender" of freedom and democracy in the Western world, the most not free and the most crushed by debts and lies of the country. Today its debt to foreign bankers is 19 264 608 549 111 greens (already more). What is ordered will blow up, even itself, even the whole world. "Who owes whom, he is also a slave!"
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. +13
    2 May 2016 15: 22
    that's how it was)))

    1. 0
      2 May 2016 16: 17
      Well, of course, black humor.
  23. +1
    2 May 2016 15: 23
    Look you! The sheikhs of the "supernation" were pinched by the primary sexual characteristics.
  24. 0
    2 May 2016 15: 25
    Someone doubted? On the 1993 terrorist attack of the year in the WTC of New York, the situation is similar, supposedly the 2x Arabs took silence as well. That's what they answered. The first time did not work, repeating after.
  25. +2
    2 May 2016 15: 28
    It became like a dialogue in Soviet cinema (scream but only top secret)
  26. +19
    2 May 2016 15: 42
    Quote: EvgNik
    the secret part of the terrorist attack requested by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand

    Do we need it? Still lie. In addition to the secret part of the report, there is probably and forever classified (or maybe destroyed) data on actual customers and executors of the attack.


    Twin towers were insured against the attack shortly before 11 September 2001 year

    The official version that the twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed as a result of the al-Qaeda attack was denied many times. Some arguments sound very convincing - it would be difficult for terrorists to hijack four planes at once and bring them to their targets without assistance, a few hours after the terrorist attack, Al-Qaeda was already identified, and immediately after that the “War against Terrorism” was declared to international terrorism ", The buildings themselves were destroyed very carefully, not at all as they should, etc.
    Who benefits?
    Of course, this is beneficial to the US government, as there was a reason to invade several countries at once, in which chaos continues to this day under the guise of combating terrorism.
    But even more doubts arise when you learn the other side of the World Trade Center. The old WTC complex, which included the twin towers, was built back in the 1973 year, by the end of the 20 century it brought its owners only losses, and the buildings also needed expensive repairs of at least 200 million dollars. This amount was supposed to go to replace some materials, for example, asbestos, which was recognized as harmful to human health in the 80's.
    Who benefits from the September 1 attack
    The WTC owners, Port Authority, even had the idea of ​​demolishing buildings and simply building new ones, but the New York authorities did not allow this, since asbestos dust would settle in the city.
    And then Larry Silverstay appears, who is ready to pay for the rental of the problematic WTC for 99 years 3,2 billion dollars. After completion of the transaction, he immediately insures his purchase in the amount of 3,6 billion dollars, including from a terrorist attack. It is noteworthy that the amount of 3,2 billion was not paid before the attack, since it was divided into monthly payments, and for a month and a half Larry Silverstay managed to pay only 14 million.
    11 September 2001 of the year there was a terrorist attack and Silverstay turned to the insurance company for payments. At the same time, he tried to receive a payment of 7,2 billion, as he believed that the two attacks occurred at different times, with the participation of two different buildings and different planes. The trial dragged on for 6 years, but Larry Silverstay received an insurance benefit of $ 4,6 billion, and also remained a tenant of the area under the destroyed WTC.
    http://factik.ru/bashni-bliznecy-byli-zastraxovany-ot-terakta-nezadolgo-do-11-se


    ntyabrya-2001-goda /
    No politics, just money. The lives of people are dirt! Democracy, damn it ...
    1. +1
      2 May 2016 22: 46
      Quote: avg-mgn
      The court dragged on for 6 years, but Larry Silverstay received an insurance payment of $ 4,6 billion, and also remained a tenant of the area under the destroyed WTC.


      Now this Larry is sitting on the shore of the ocean, somewhere in the Bahamas, with a cocktail in his hand and tells his friends:
      - You will not believe! But purely lucky!
    2. +2
      3 May 2016 08: 35
      More about the Pentagon. According to the official version, a passenger airliner got into the building.
      Hit the repaired wing. One officer responsible for repairs in this area was killed. For some time, he led groups of workers to this wing, where they worked. Then they did not appear again. On the video camera, at a gas station, a passing object cannot be identified as a Liner - rather, as an unmanned aerial vehicle.
      At the first pictures of knowledge, one could notice a modest-sized hole in the outer wall of the building. Where the wings, engines and other elements of the aircraft are not known. It is also unknown which liner it was and if it took off: where it fell.
  27. +1
    2 May 2016 16: 07
    I am ashamed to admit where the President rushed to?
  28. +1
    2 May 2016 16: 12
    Quote: avg-mgn
    No politics, just money. The lives of people are dirt! Democracy, damn it ...

    That's exactly what money is. The foundation of the western world. Gradually pushed into our lives. Someone earns to live, and someone lives to earn.
  29. +2
    2 May 2016 16: 18
    The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks
    They do not want to testify against themselves.
  30. Tim
    +1
    2 May 2016 16: 19
    The head of the CIA, John Brennan, is politics first and foremost, and we’ll build new towers, American freedom in exchange for oil.
  31. +1
    2 May 2016 16: 20
    When the very stigma in the gun, what may be declassification. And then, for some types of business, terrorists are such a profitable thing ...
  32. 0
    2 May 2016 16: 54
    how to declassify them if you yourself have done it all.
  33. +5
    2 May 2016 17: 18
    Everyone who had a real relationship with the execution and organization of this terrorist attack fell into a car a long time ago, accidentally drowned while swimming, and died from a sudden heart attack and other diseases. Even those who had heart attacks and drove cars most likely already in the next world. A quote from the imperishable film of Mimino begs: everyone is dead. Less money was spent on the investigation of the terrorist attack than on the investigation of Clinton’s entertainment in the oral office.
    Murder Kennedy remember. Those who could at least tell something were removed very quickly.
    I am not a supporter of conspiracy theories, but this attack was simply necessary, it could not fail to happen.
  34. 0
    2 May 2016 17: 35
    Well, right, they are not suicides!
  35. +3
    2 May 2016 17: 41
    The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks Well, rightly, no magician will begin to reveal the secret of his number and no gopnik will confess to his crime.
  36. +2
    2 May 2016 17: 46
    The CIA will not declassify data on the organization of the September 11 attack, as well as May 2 in Odessa ...
    1. +1
      3 May 2016 08: 52
      yes, I also agree with this answer
  37. 0
    2 May 2016 18: 37
    Quote: Tatiana
    And what is there to declassify something ?!

    It turns out that the perpetrators were declared, "Al-Qaeda" and Bin Laden. They waged a war in Afghanistan, destroyed the "main" terrorist. But in fact, all these investigations turn out to be secret-MAYBE traces of the crime lead in a completely different direction! recourse hi
  38. +1
    2 May 2016 18: 58
    In general, when something happens, you need to ask a question to whom is it beneficial? And everything will fall into place, the September 11 terrorist attack was exclusively beneficial for the United States, thanks to this it was possible to unleash active military operations in Afghanistan and remove your unnecessary protege Bin Laden, as well as start a war in Iraq, showing the countries of the region who is the owner of the house. For one, the military factories received orders, and the budget for the army increased, and the US population did not hesitate to support all military interventions of its state. So who is guilty of the September 11 attack, you can only guess wink
  39. +10
    2 May 2016 19: 13
    In this topic, two points were very pleased:
    all users were united in the expression of their thoughts;
    no one insults or rudely makes fun of other members of the forum.
    Forum users - let's be mutually polite to each other, because the real life around us is already quite aggressive drinks ATP
  40. +5
    2 May 2016 19: 15
    http://mytube.uz/tracks/457613.htm

    The filmmakers of the documentary 'The 9/11 Mystery' set out to prove that the twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed on September 11, 2001, not because of a fire that broke out after planes hijacked by terrorists, but as a result of controlled explosions.
    The authors of the documentary film 'The 9/11 Riddle' are confident that the temperature in the buildings during the fire, which, moreover, was focal in nature, was not enough to bring down the steel structures of the towers. The version about explosions is supported by the fact that the collapse occurred very quickly, 'with the speed of free fall'.
    According to experts, this is evidenced by dust clouds, and the blast wave that occurred after the collapse, and the fact that at the crash site, under the rubble, firefighters discovered tons of molten and solidified metal. Metal could melt only when using the thermite explosive compound.
    The version of the explosions is also confirmed by the fact that about a thousand bodies of victims of the tragedy were never found, and hundreds of bone fragments were found on the roofs of nearby buildings. Experts are also surprised by the fact that the 47-story WTC building No. 7, into which the plane did not crash, also collapsed, and the collapse bore all the signs of a controlled explosion.
    Convinced that the twin towers were blown up, the authors of the documentary 'The Riddle of 9/11' are trying to find an answer to the question of why it was done and who benefited from it. In their opinion, the main stakeholder could be the tenant of the World Trade Center, Larry Silverstein.
    He received more than eight billion dollars in insurance payments, despite the fact that the purchase of the right to lease the complex cost him fourteen million dollars. In the collapsed building of WTC No. 7, thousands of files of the Securities Commission related to illegal financial transactions and documents of seventy billion damage from the actions of energy companies in California were killed
  41. 0
    2 May 2016 19: 16
    They don’t knock on themselves.
    1. +3
      2 May 2016 19: 34
      And yet, how could the titanium parts of the engines of an airplane screwed into the Pentagon evaporate?
      Watch from 35 minutes.
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. +2
    2 May 2016 20: 08
    "But many people are not fools at all, and they understand that if they are persistently injected with information"
    here on this important place I propose to focus your attention.
  44. +3
    2 May 2016 20: 41
    It is not clear how it is possible, in general, to classify the results of the investigation into the tragedy, the catastrophe of the national headquarters! This is possible only in one case when this secret data incriminates the investigator himself.
  45. +2
    2 May 2016 21: 00
    I always knew that one state may not be another state. But it continues to amaze me that the country's governments systematically go to the destruction of their own people. The worst thing is that such behavior is becoming the norm in all countries of the world.
    1. 0
      5 May 2016 11: 47
      In their understanding, there are too many of us. Impudent mouths devouring their resources. There you go. Especially a lot of people in Russia. We draw conclusions, and multi-vector ones.
  46. +2
    2 May 2016 21: 08
    The CIA will not declassify the investigation data on the September 11 attacks

    The CIA will not expose itself hi
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. Mih
    +1
    2 May 2016 21: 52
    US friendship with the Saudis. laughing

    So such a friendship between two democracies, such! Saudi Arabia is just a beacon of democracy according to the definition of US democracy. Friendship peace and brothers forever. What can I say - this is support for the real democratic values ​​of the Western world, and this must be understood by all "liberals." fellow
  49. PBF
    0
    2 May 2016 21: 55
    So do not say yes. We already understood everything!
  50. -9
    2 May 2016 21: 56
    There was the usual nuclear demolition of three skyscrapers using underground explosions. In this case, radiation does not fall outside, and the building into dust.
    "In this video interview, a certain Dmitry Khalezov, a former officer of the Soviet special control service, popularly explains to the workers how the Americans used three 150-kiloton underground thermonuclear explosions to demolish three buildings of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, and also, where did the Soviet Granit missile come from with a 500 kiloton unexploded thermonuclear warhead that was used by the so-called terrorists to attack the Pentagon. "
    1. +7
      3 May 2016 00: 16
      Quote: Grave With Cross 3
      There was the usual nuclear demolition of three skyscrapers using underground explosions

      I won’t even listen to this nonsense. But the Western consumer shavat at a time. hi
      1. +6
        3 May 2016 00: 29
        Quote: Canecat
        Quote: Grave With Cross 3 Was the usual nuclear demolition of three skyscrapers using underground explosions

        There video case is not fucking TV? And then I do not show something. Do not watch it, you will quickly fall into a fool.
    2. +6
      3 May 2016 06: 16
      Such a scenario is not possible. Radiation was detected, groundwater pollution was again detected. Yes, and the declared capacity is excessive - amateurs prepared the report
      1. +1
        4 May 2016 21: 16
        What about other underground utilities within a radius of a couple of kilometers ... metro, pipelines ...? Turn on your head ...
    3. Jon
      +4
      3 May 2016 07: 18
      That's right - you know, it happens, we look - it thinks the way it is
    4. +3
      3 May 2016 07: 49
      had fun - put a plus
    5. +1
      4 May 2016 12: 05
      I did not master the video, but here is about this "normal" demolition.
      http://maxpark.com/community/2599/content/772242
  51. +1
    2 May 2016 22: 31
    Quote: EvgNik
    Someone earns to live, and someone lives to earn.

    Democracy is the power of democrats.
    Hello, Eugene.
  52. -1
    3 May 2016 03: 09
    Using September 11 as cover, the United States entered Afghanistan and Iraq. But not a single Iraqi or Afghan was in the United States; they did not blow up anything there.
  53. 0
    3 May 2016 03: 53
    Quote: Grave With Cross 3
    three 150-kiloton underground thermonuclear explosions

    drinks :))
    it's so funny!
    Quote: Grave With Cross 3
    and also where exactly the Soviet Granit missile came from with an unexploded 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead, which was used by the so-called. 'terrorists' to attack the Pentagon."

    lol
  54. 0
    3 May 2016 06: 10
    Viper. Snake ball.
  55. 0
    3 May 2016 07: 26
    It’s somehow disgusting to even get acquainted with such news, although this news has long been assumed.
  56. 0
    3 May 2016 08: 07
    “But many people are not fools at all, and they understand that if they persistently introduce information about one thing, but at the same time hide information about another, then the matter is not clear,” said Kireev.

    Another example is when the CIA “declassified some documents” from the times of perestroika in the USSR, from which it follows that they were preoccupied with finding out “who Gorbachev was,” when he became a leader and when his sun set what . This, it turns out, was the CIA’s ultimate mission! And how can they be “fluffy” and not involved in the rest of what happened in the USSR? laughing
  57. 0
    3 May 2016 08: 10
    In my opinion, the translation is not correct or is being presented this way on purpose. The decision to declassify or not is made by the Senate. And the CIA does not RECOMMEND declassification. There is a difference?
    And what about blowing up the building is nonsense! Unnoticed by everyone, two skyscrapers were mined at night? Are the crashing planes a video montage?
  58. 0
    3 May 2016 08: 24
    What if there won’t be any publications today? No news?
  59. 0
    3 May 2016 08: 38
    Quote: Grave With Cross 3
    There was the usual nuclear demolition of three skyscrapers using underground explosions. In this case, radiation does not fall outside, and the building into dust.
    "In this video interview, a certain Dmitry Khalezov, a former officer of the Soviet special control service, popularly explains to the workers how the Americans used three 150-kiloton underground thermonuclear explosions to demolish three buildings of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, and also, where did the Soviet Granit missile come from with a 500 kiloton unexploded thermonuclear warhead that was used by the so-called terrorists to attack the Pentagon. "

    You are sick???! Read a physics textbook about what a thermonuclear explosion is; you don’t need to listen to the rest of this article. This kind of nonsense is designed for illiterate and lazy people like you, who are too lazy to read the theory and too lazy to double-check the facts, at least via the Internet.
    1. +1
      3 May 2016 19: 18
      Serezhenka, my boy, here is a photo of the steel frame of the shopping center tower. Steel piles around the perimeter and inside. THE SECTION OF THE STEEL BEAM IS RECTANGULAR. THE THICKNESS OF EACH WALL EXCEEDS THE THICKNESS OF THE FRONT ARMOR OF THE T-34 TANK - MORE THAN 45 MILLIMETERS. And all this turned to dust?! Yes, you shoot cumulative shells at this tower for 100 years - it won’t do a damn thing. That’s why industrial nuclear demolition exists, Serezhenka. Already since the late 1950s. The Soviet Union also had developments in nuclear demolition. So Serezhenka, think with your head sometimes. For a change. laughing
      1. +2
        4 May 2016 12: 45
        I support. I don’t know about nuclear demolition (not my topic), but the fact that it was precisely the demolition of a shopping center does not need to go to grandma. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g3Qo96_fmI - this is what came up first. And yes, the frame of these shopping centers will not allow planes to penetrate it, especially through it. Although I’m a C student, I’m still a builder (AltSTU_Civil Faculty_PGS).
  60. 0
    3 May 2016 10: 26
    And what is this "state" one where the people do not protest for their own government’s concealment of a global catastrophe carried out by terrorism? am am am
  61. -1
    3 May 2016 12: 32
    They proved once again that they are p... Hahaha you fagots.
  62. 0
    3 May 2016 15: 47
    what is being declassified here... everyone knows that this is the work of stupid Bush who wanted to maintain the leadership of the United States. and shoot down a Boeing in Donetsk...and a Russian plane in Syria is his rotten handwriting...