Military Review

Bulgarian occupation of Serbia. Part of 2

158
In the occupied territories, the Bulgarian authorities used two methods to achieve their goals. The first is forced Bulgarisation. Serbian language was banned in official use. Newborns were forbidden to give Serbian names, the surnames of the population changed to Bulgarian: Markovic - Markov, Petrovich - Petrov. Serbian national clothing was also banned. In the newly established Bulgarian schools, children were told that they really were Bulgarians and should be happy about it.


The second method was the physical destruction of the carriers of the Serbian national spirit - priests, teachers, intellectuals. 7 November 1915, the occupying Bulgarian authorities demanded to register all priests, teachers, officials, etc. The people who came to the Nis administration were arrested and placed in the casemates of the Niš fortress. 11 November they were sent to Sofia. At the same time, twenty priests and two officers were shot near the village of Kremenitsa near Bela Palanka. A few more priests Bulgarians killed near the village Elachnitsa.

Victims of shooting in Surdulitsa


In addition to Nis, a large number of Serbs were arrested in other cities - Vranje, упuprija, Leskovac, etc. All of them after several days of imprisonment were driven to Bulgaria. However, most survived only to the small town of Surdulitsy, where they were destroyed. There was a so-called military court. According to the pre-delivered lists of the arrested, Bulgarian officers decided who to live and who to execute. Most were waiting for the shooting ... Around the city, Bulgarian soldiers dug up several mass graves, where they threw the bodies of the dead. A similar fate awaited those people who were sent to Bulgaria via Vranje. According to rough estimates, 3000 people died in Surdulitsa, about 3500 people died in Vranje.

In addition to the mass executions, throughout the occupation, killing, looting and violence perpetrated by Bulgarian soldiers and gendarmerie continued. Already in the first months after the occupation, Chetnik troops appeared on the territory of Serbia, which began a guerrilla war. Not being able to completely destroy the partisans, the Bulgarian troops recouped the civilian population ...

The victims of the Bulgarian army


The Bulgarians, who suffered heavy losses on the Salonika front, tried to compensate them at the expense of the Serbian youth by announcing conscription. The answer was the Toplice uprising, which began on February 21 1917. At the head of the rebels stood the Chetnik Costa Pechanac. In late February and early March, the Serbs managed to liberate a large area around the South Morava valley. Having assessed its threat, Austro-Hungarian and Bulgarian troops concentrated around the uprising a grouping of 30 000 soldiers and officers, some of whom were summoned from the front. The attack on the Serbs began on March 12, and on the 25 dates of the same month, the Bulgarians announced the defeat of the rebels.

The result of the uprising was bloody - almost half of the rebels died in battle. Around 20 000 civilians were victims of revenge by the Austro-Hungarian and Bulgarian troops. The villages were burned, and their population was destroyed. It is noteworthy that, according to the memoirs of contemporaries, the Bulgarian soldiers preferred not to spend the ammunition, but to destroy the civilian population with bayonets or by hanging. Partly "distinguished" part of Colonel Alexander Protogerov, on their way destroying all living things.

The remains of Serbs killed in Surdulitsa


Resistance to the invaders continued after the defeat of the Toplitsky uprising. The Chetniks continued fighting, despite major losses. A heavy blow was struck on them in December 1917, when one of their leaders, Costa Voinovich, was killed near the village of Grgur.

14 September 1918, the Serbian and French divisions began the breakthrough of Thessaloniki front. After several days of fierce fighting, the Bulgarian army began a retreat, ending with its collapse. Tens of thousands of soldiers refused to obey orders and continue the war. September 29 Bulgaria concluded an armistice with the Entente powers. One of his conditions was the return of all the territories seized from Serbia, and the Bulgarian troops, located west of the Skopje meridian, were to surrender.

Freeing the country from the continuing resistance of the Austro-Hungarian and German troops, the Serbian soldiers ran into traces of atrocities by the occupiers. 20 December 1918, the famous Swiss criminalist Archibald Reuss, who was the headquarters of the Serbian army, prepared a report on the crimes in Surdulica. In parallel with him, the International Commission began studying the crimes of the Bulgarian army and gendarmerie. The results of her investigations, along with Reuss's messages, were published in Paris in 1919, and then in other European capitals.

Captured Bulgarians
Author:
158 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor39
    Igor39 April 30 2016 06: 32
    +12
    "Brothers" constantly betray and do such things ....
    Even though they are screaming about their love, and in our time they have managed to lick the ass of the Yankees with South Stream
    It is not necessary to conduct any business with them, it’s stupid to just deal with the Bulgarians, they depend on someone for life, they don’t have independence.
    1. Rock_n_roll
      Rock_n_roll April 30 2016 10: 00
      -11%
      The ignorant idot has not yet understood anything in life, but already loudly declares what needs to be done and what is not.
      1. Igor39
        Igor39 April 30 2016 10: 22
        +6
        Here is your love and gratitude
        1. ivanovbg
          ivanovbg April 30 2016 11: 02
          +11
          Several monuments painted a monument and you already think that all Bulgarians are like that ??? Look how the monument 9 of May 2015 looked like. And in a week it will be ironed exactly the same, I will specially send you a photo!

          1. Aleksander
            Aleksander April 30 2016 11: 07
            +11
            Quote: ivanovbg
            Look at the monument of 9 on May 2015.


            Yes, the Bulgarians can be thanked for being around 800 Monuments Russian and Soviet soldiers and politicians stand and look after them.
          2. Pushkar
            Pushkar April 30 2016 14: 24
            +6
            Several ..... kov during the day for several hours painted a monument in the center of Sofia - and NOBODY objected, did not call the police! Moreover, no witnesses were found - "no one saw"! And 30 people with a dozen flags at the monument on May 9 is something liquid. More people come to the pederast parade in Bulgaria. For comparison, you can see how many people come to the monument to the liberators in Riga on May 9.
            1. Angor
              Angor April 30 2016 14: 34
              0
              Why 30, maybe 130! You just didn’t count. Are you sure right in the afternoon?
              1. Pushkar
                Pushkar April 30 2016 14: 50
                0
                In the afternoon. So it was in the message. But even if it were at night, it would be illuminated, it would be visible. By the way, the monument is painted regularly, for the last time in the colors of Bandera's "zhovto-blakitny" flag. http://izvestia.ru/news/566580
            2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Schultz
            Schultz 3 May 2016 17: 04
            0
            Christ is Risen, Orthodox! I urge you to abandon mutual accusations and search for those guilty in the past history of the Slavs for the duration of the Bright Week. For it has become clear to everyone long ago that the world's evil does not need - neither Russians, nor Bulgarians, nor Serbs, but "white slaves" with the suppression (as a result of genocide)) of the primordial faith and the boundaries of the habitat are needed.
            1. Angor
              Angor 3 May 2016 20: 34
              +2
              Truly risen, Orthodox!
              ".... recriminations and search for the guilty ...." - This is not the essence of what is happening.
              Read your last dictum, this is the truth! And when you comprehend what you wrote, I will no longer need to prove that this article is not true.
        2. stoqn477
          stoqn477 April 30 2016 13: 15
          +2
          This is not a Russian but a Soviet army. It has differences. Not a single memorial for the war of 1877-1878 has ever been desecrated. This is a liberating war for us. At the moment they said that the monument "Tsar Liberator" would be dismantled for repairs, the people were excited why they feared him destruction.
        3. pytar
          pytar April 30 2016 14: 27
          +11
          К Igor39! "Desecration of monuments" is a favorite topic for pin-dos-ovs strategists of information war! The system works very simply! 1. An order is given to commit some event, which can then be inflated in the media! 2. For example with monuments - the order is executed by a small group of marginal ones. Insignificance, which is in all countries of the world. Here they painted the monument and ALL the 5th column of magazines-sluts, pasted in the Russian media, begins to scream tirelessly - "Bulgarians, traitors, Bulgarians massively defile Russian monuments, Bulgarian enemies" and so on ... Since the topic is sensitive for Russians, and a person is so arranged that it is easier to believe the bad, then many Russians begin to look at the Bulgarians with a negative. Moreover, for the whole Bulgarian people. After all, the whole topic is presented as if the whole Bulgarian people are like that! All the trolls diligently water their moods and as a result it is expected that the Russians will hate the Bulgarians, and the Bulgarians will hate the Russians in return! At the same time, all the media outlets for some reason forget to mention How many Russian and Soviet monuments are there in Bulgaria and what condition are they in? The answer is more than in any other country in the world and their condition is excellent! And not a single monument is really touched!After all, you can easily check everything! On the official website of the Ministry of Culture, there is a list where you can check for each monument, what is its condition and other relevant information. All monuments are monitored and maintained despite the scarce means of the Bulgarian budget! And so, what do you think the author of the previous comment Igor39, who didn’t put into the topic the questionnaire about the monuments ???
          1. 97110
            97110 April 30 2016 16: 23
            +2
            Quote: pytar
            All monuments are monitored and maintained despite the scarce means of the Bulgarian budget!

            Where can we get money for a meager budget? From the YUS anus, no matter how much you lick, only ... Brussels ordered to destroy the Bulgarian economy, the Bulgarians answered "yes!" Did the Bulgarian government (consisting of Bulgarians? This is not in a European way) have any awards? Will the meager funds of the Bulgarian budget run out? Money is needed to prepare for a war with the Russians. Uncle Sam says that all allies should bear the costs. America, too, has no rubber budget. Bulgaria should help YUS cope with Russia! As a serviceable ally of all opponents of Russia! There will be a team from Brussels, where will you go? You are no stranger to, put on German helmets, take German rifles, and march, finish the Serbs. Or Russians. Who will be ordered. Or Bulgarians ... If Brussels thinks that there are a lot of you for European reasons.
            1. nedgen
              nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 17
              +4
              With regard to the venality of our politicians and their fulfillment of orders from Brussels and Fashington, I completely agree with you
          2. Atomist
            Atomist 2 May 2016 08: 17
            +1
            God grant, if so. Thank you, we really believe the bad easier, but always hope for the best.
        4. Alibekulu
          Alibekulu 1 May 2016 06: 46
          +5
          Quote: Igor39
          Here is your love and gratitude
          By the way, no one noticed that a rather large faction from Bulgaria was present at VO. Moreover, which is especially contrasting against the background of the complete absence of Serbs request.. Where are you "brothers" ?!
          At the same time, the Bulgarians present are very complimentary to Russia and Russians. And instead of using this foundation to strengthen truly fraternal ties (people's diplomacy), the Great Russians, as always, traditionally manage to, I apologize to "bash" opponents ..
          This is what cannot be taken away from the Great Russians, so this is the ability to mess with others .. Apparently, even the sad results of xoxlossracha do not go for the future. On topvar, as if in a circle, it gets to the clever Belarusians, "traitors" Bulgarians, unreasonable Kazakhs, "Syrian" Tajiks ..
          Although this is the quality that unites them with the Serb bratushki. Those, too, managed to spoil relations with everyone in the district ... wassat
          1. but still
            but still 1 May 2016 11: 13
            +1
            Alibekulu (2) KZ good That's it!
        5. The stranger
          The stranger 3 May 2016 01: 34
          +2
          But weren’t in Stalingrad Russian teenagers grilling kebabs on the Eternal Flame? And isn’t Mamaev Kurgan, juvenile whores, not with Bulgarian passports, shaking their bare asses?
          Modern adolescent idiocy is not a question of nationality. It may not be worth fooling yourself, and pull the chicken by the ears. She is not a hare.
  2. Valery Valery
    Valery Valery April 30 2016 07: 08
    +10
    The Bulgarians fought against us both world wars, now it is a NATO country. Why did someone decide that we can be friends with us ?!
    1. nedgen
      nedgen April 30 2016 10: 51
      +6
      I agree for WWI, but not ONE Bulgarian soldier in WWII (he didn’t even fight as a volunteer AGAINST the USSR, but 20 soldiers died in battles against the Nazis.
      1. AK64
        AK64 April 30 2016 11: 03
        +3
        but not one Bulgarian soldier in WWII (he didn’t even fight against the USSR as a volunteer


        This is a legend which (contrary to common sense) was preached in the USSR.
        But in fact, there were military operations on the Black Sea of ​​the Bulgarian Navy, there were.

        Not that many, but there were
        1. nedgen
          nedgen April 30 2016 11: 15
          +1
          I told the SOLDIER and not the sailor and children fighting was carried out in the Bulgarian territorial waters. And not near the coast of the USSR !!!
          1. AK64
            AK64 April 30 2016 12: 24
            +3
            Children were fighting in Bulgarian territorial waters. And not off the coast of the USSR


            It's right.
        2. The stranger
          The stranger 3 May 2016 01: 55
          0
          Well, consider - believed.
          Come on now, remind us of what the fighting was like. What was the composition of the Bulgarian fleet at that time, and how did it drown the Soviet destroyers and submarines.
          Will you apologize?
      2. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 16: 24
        -1
        Quote: nedgen
        I agree for WWI, but not ONE Bulgarian soldier in WWII (he didn’t even fight as a volunteer AGAINST the USSR, but 20 soldiers died in battles against the Nazis.

        Well, from London it’s better to know who fought with whom.
        1. nedgen
          nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 08
          +4
          I work in London, and I have spent most of my life in my homeland. I am a typical economic emigrant and yet I know the history of my homeland much better than you hi
      3. Astor
        Astor 1 May 2016 04: 56
        +2
        All the same, 1500 volunteers were found, but they were not sent to the front. But in vain, now we would have less Cove! And it cannot be ruled out that one of the dyers is a descendant of one of those.
      4. Petrik66
        Petrik66 4 May 2016 11: 48
        +3
        The 1st Bulgarian SS anti-tank brigade fought in May 1945.

        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D
        0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0
        %BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0
        %B9%D1%81%D0%BA_%D0%A1%D0%A1_(1-%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8
        1%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F)
        1. but still
          but still 4 May 2016 14: 57
          +2
          There is a wikipedia article on the stories of surviving legionaries, but the DOCUMENTARY existence of this military unit is NOT CONFIRMED.
          Moreover neither the Bulgarian monarchist government nor the new communist government of Bulgaria formulated this brigadeif it really existed.
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D


          0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0


          %BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0


          %B9%D1%81%D0%BA_%D0%A1%D0%A1_%281-%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1


          %81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%29

          With the same success, you can ask the question: "What about the formations of citizens of the USSR who fought against the USSR?"

          Oh, it turns out that Russians in Serbia fought against Titan partisans and Russians of the USSR, it turns out that belay is on the side of Germany
          The Russian corps (Russian security corps, the Russian corps in Serbia (German: Russisches Schutzkorps Serbien)) was organized in 1941 after the Nazi occupation of Yugoslavia. At that time, many white officers lived in Yugoslavia. In the summer of 1941, a wave of murders swept through Yugoslavia by Russian Communist partisans emigrants and their families.24 Major General M. F. Skorodumov took the initiative to organize the Russian unit to protect the emigrant population, and on September 12, 1941, he ordered the formation of the Separate Russian Corps, with the consent of the German Colonel Kevish. autonomy of the corps from the German command, which caused a conflict and was soon arrested by the Germans by the Germans, but the formation of the corps, however, continued under the command of another Russian emigrant, Boris Shteifon.

          The corps was mainly used to protect the Yugoslav territory from the communist partisans of Tito. With the Chetniks of Dragolyub Mikhailovich, the corps mainly maintained neutral relations. In 1944, the Germans ordered the corps to cover their withdrawal from Greece. At this time, the corps participated in the battles not only with the Titan partisans, but also with the regular units of the Red Army and its new Romanian and Bulgarian allies. In the winter of 1944-1945, after the creation of the Russian Liberation Army, B. Shteifon met with Vlasov and they agreed to include the corps in the ROA. At this time, the corps retreated to Slovenia.


          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BA%

          D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0

          %B7%D0%BC_%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%92%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D

          0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B5
  3. parafoiler
    parafoiler April 30 2016 07: 17
    +4
    Yes ... Brothers ... They are no different from the Turks. 200 years of Turkish rule did not pass for them without a trace. Still those cannibals.
    1. The stranger
      The stranger 3 May 2016 01: 46
      +7
      Have you been eaten often in Bulgaria?
      Tell me, I have some opportunities, I will try to help.
      Only now, my Russian friends have not yet complained about the eating of their relatives living here. They complained about the Greeks, the Turks, the Gypsies, the waiters ... ... - practiced. But they didn’t complain about cannibals. Yes, and most like without straining, albeit a bloody Russophile.
  4. Pitot
    Pitot April 30 2016 07: 24
    +1
    I agree with all of the above.
  5. svp67
    svp67 April 30 2016 07: 33
    +4
    Is it any wonder that the Serbs are cruel to the Bulgarians?
    1. nedgen
      nedgen April 30 2016 11: 13
      +6
      It’s because the first in the history of modern Serbia and Bulgaria attacked Serbia back in 1885, and what is described about the prohibition of the Serbian language, and so on. It began after 1913 in Macedonia against the Bulgarian population. So ... as I wrote in my comments to the first part, everything is far from so simple. And the author of the article does not even want to ask when they started and who first began the mutual atrocities. In his opinion, the Bulgarians are to blame for everything and the Serbs are white and fluffy, although as the war in Yugoslavia showed, when representatives of the same nationality (Serbs) fought, although of different religions (Serbs - Orthodox; Croats - Catholics, Bosniaks - Muslims and ALL THEY speak Serbo - Croatian) mutual cruelty went wild beyond all limits. So sorry BUT the article is aimed only at inciting hatred towards the Bulgarians. Of course I do not deny that the Bulgarian authorities have always chosen the enemies of Russia and between us and Bulgaria, but we have what we have and call all Bulgarians cannibals ...
      1. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 16: 29
        0
        Quote: nedgen
        call all Bulgarians cannibals ...

        Among the Soviet humorists, some were called cannibals and soul lovers. For people who are not native to Russian, I note that there are Russian words "cannibal" and "murderer"
        1. nedgen
          nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 19
          +3
          Quote: 97110
          For people who are not native to Russian, I note that there are Russian words "cannibal" and "murderer"


          For people who do not speak Bulgarian as a native language, the Bulgarian language also has exactly the same words as murderer and cannibal.
  6. parusnik
    parusnik April 30 2016 08: 05
    +12
    It is worth thinking about all the Slavic peoples and drawing conclusions ... We have a thousand-year history .. and we can’t live together .. And the main thing is to our detriment ... Has the history of the Lyutichs, Bodrich and others taught nothing .. where are they? They disappeared, whom they destroyed, whom they assimilated .. But apparently not, I’m not afraid of these words, the West has been genocide of the Slavs since olden times, almost since the time of Charlemagne ... so no .. The West will help us ... we Europeans ... well, Well .. Isn’t it time to change my mind ...
    1. AK64
      AK64 April 30 2016 08: 28
      +3
      It is worth considering all the Slavic peoples and draw conclusions ...

      Bulgarians are very doubtful Slavs.
      Yes, just not the Slavs.
      They are "Slavs" only in the (borrowed) language.

      Well .... The favorite conversation among the Bulgarians is how well they lived in the Ottoman Empire (that is, under the Turks).
      1. V.ic
        V.ic April 30 2016 08: 53
        +1
        Quote: AK64
        Bulgarians are very doubtful Slavs. Yes, just not the Slavs.

        Khans Krum and Asparukh took a part of the Bulgars from the Volga to the Danube, where they sat as boyars on the neck of the local Slavic population. But they say that the fish rots from the head ... If the ruling class is not related to the local population, then the invaders / Turks / Germans / NATO will always “love” this people as they want.
        And about cruelty, from ancient times the Bulgarians loved to amuse themselves by beating prisoners, as well as the Greeks.
        Kaloyan (the name is translated from Greek as Good, Affectionate John) - Bulgarian king (1197-1207)
        "In 1201 Kaloyan took Constanta, then Varna (where the prisoners were buried alive)"
        http://www.people.su/47955
        1. nedgen
          nedgen April 30 2016 11: 49
          +6
          Sorry V.ic, but, to put it mildly, you confuse a lot of things, firstly after the collapse of Great Bulgaria (Kana Kurt in Greek Kubrat) between, however, buried near the village of Malaya Pereshchepina, today Ukraine (the burial was accidentally found and plundered back in Tsarist Russia), And it the son of Isper (in Greek Asparukh) did not lead the Bulgarians to the Danube because Great Bulgaria stretched from the Don to the Carpathians anyway, just moved the capital beyond the Danube to the newly founded Pliska. Kan Krum lived much later than Isper in the late 8th and early 9th centuries. As for "the huge local settlement of the Slavs is a fairy tale. Yes, there were many Slavs, but there was no union of seven tribes, but a union of seven clans and a tribe of the north. The fact that the Bulgarians sat boyars on the neck of the Slavs - no need to bring the history of Russia to the Bulgarian. did not destroy the Slavic aristocracy. Until the time of Simeon, the names of the Slavic princes were often mentioned in the chronicles. After that, they stopped dividing into Bulgarians and Slavs. All became Bulgarians.
          About Kaloyan - a special story. First, the Byzantines so dubbed him. His name is Ivanitsa, and Kaloyan means Kal Yoan i.e. beautiful Ivan. Yes, he was distinguished by cruelty to the Byzantine prisoners (after the Byzantines betrayed him). Before that, he had an alliance with the Byzantines against the crusaders who had captured Constantinople. And about the invaders of the Slavs laughing Yes, nowhere in historical sources there is no evidence that the Slavs rebelled against the Bulgarians. But if something like this, Byzantine historians would not have missed such a fact.
          1. V.ic
            V.ic April 30 2016 15: 16
            -4
            Quote: nedgen
            and Kaloyan means Feces Yoan i.e. beautiful Ivan.

            Well, since "feces", so let the feces remain!
            1. nedgen
              nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 14
              +6
              So after all, Kaloyan’s feces came from Greek and not from Bulgarian or Russian. And the fact that he was not dirt or kaka .. shkoy can be seen from the chronicles.
    2. Morrrow
      Morrrow April 30 2016 10: 54
      0
      The West does not exist. Karl was just friendly to the Slavs. The Slavs hated Henry Ptitselov and Henry the Bear
      1. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 16: 32
        -2
        Quote: Morrrow
        Carl is just friendly

        Friends are sometimes worse than enemies.
        You save me from friends! (Marshak?)
    3. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 1 May 2016 02: 17
      0
      ", The West has been carrying on the genocide of the Slavs for a long time," /////

      A significant part of the Slavic peoples perfectly adapted to
      Europe. Czechs, Poles, Slovenes. Others in transition
      now. In the future, it is clear: ALL Slavic peoples, geographically
      located in Europe - and politically sided with Europe.
      Sooner or later.
      Russia will have to get used to this.
      And to establish friendly relations with a united Europe.






      1. The stranger
        The stranger 3 May 2016 04: 38
        +3
        Yes, they did not adapt. They just were Germanized, so far partially. For example, the Prussians - the most terrible German soldiers - the earliest Germanized Slavs. Already completely, unlike the Czechs, Slovenes, and then I find it difficult to list, because it is not an anthropologist. But actually - it's in school atlases on history.
        But when the process stops, I would really like to know. For it concerns my people.

        I have friendly relations with representatives of many European nations. I friendly visited cities of many European nations. I spoke confidentially with representatives of many European nations, you don’t think, I’m only in the sense of a lieutenant Rzhevsky, without vulgarity.
        Only I do not have, I do not want, and I am not going to be part of this society. In no way do I educate the people entrusted to me with those views, nor do I accept the idea of ​​a future rapprochement on their terms
        Conchita Wurst, Merkel, Unshaven - Not My Europe. Although I am Europe - Danube Bulgaria is soon 1400 years old, then the word "Europe" did not exist yet. And Bulgaria was.
        Byzantium disappeared, the Tatars disappeared, the Otoman Empire is remembered only by associate professors in the best universities, centuries have passed. But Bulgaria was not there, it was resurrected, it was written off, but it is. And in all ages, it treated Russia as it is.
        Only the Chinese and Egyptians, perhaps, exist longer than us. Only they do not know how to speak in Russian :) We’ll still sing.
  7. V.ic
    V.ic April 30 2016 08: 28
    +1
    Now I would like to listen to the babble of the Bulgarian "druzhbanans" to justify their "heroism" in the destruction of the Serbs. Last time there was a "couple of friends". Hey, Bulgarians ...
    1. SokolfromRussia
      April 30 2016 10: 43
      0
      Yes, they already write "you are lying" ...
    2. V.ic
      V.ic April 30 2016 15: 13
      -2
      Quote: V.ic
      Aw, Bulgarians ...

      Only three of them were noted (this I think by the "cons"). Probably the eggs are painted ...
      1. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 16: 34
        -3
        Quote: V.ic
        Probably eggs are painted ..

        And doesn’t they have Easter by NATO standards?
        1. V.ic
          V.ic April 30 2016 18: 49
          -3
          Quote: 97110
          And doesn’t they have Easter by NATO standards?

          Hope the Orthodox were ...
          1. 97110
            97110 April 30 2016 21: 28
            -2
            Quote: V.ic
            Hope the Orthodox were ...

            Duc and these, from near Kiev, too ... were. There was one hope, for Rabbit, that they would starve them to death, and their brains would come. There is no rabbit, the State Department makes sure that they do not grow wiser.
    3. nedgen
      nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 25
      +5
      I seem to have already written that the Serbs were the first to start after 1913 in Vardar Macedonia - everything that was described in the article (of course with other geographical names) began with respect to the Bulgarian majority. There were even concentration camps (of course, after 1918), and the account of the dead and tortured Bulgarians went off scale for 200 people. And still in Macedonia they plant for the statement that the Macedonians are Bulgarians. And the first aggressive move back in 000 was made by Serbia attacking the Principality of Bulgaria.
  8. Aleksander
    Aleksander April 30 2016 09: 09
    +2
    the Bulgarian army began a retreat, ending in its collapse. Tens of thousands of soldiers refused to obey orders and continue the war.

    Bulgaria's new Turkish "brothers" did not help Bulgaria. She forgot the rule, you fight against Russia, you lose EVERYTHING.
    1. stoqn477
      stoqn477 April 30 2016 10: 11
      -1
      And how many years did you fight against the enemy that surpassed you? The Turkish units were not on the Solun Front. They fought against Russia after they entered Dobruja together with Romania. For this, your Black Sea fleet fired on Varna and destroyed Balchik. True great heroism.
      1. Igor39
        Igor39 April 30 2016 10: 28
        +3
        How many have you fought with the Turks since 1396? While Alexander 2 did not release you with the Russian army, and you, as a token of gratitude, fought the First and Second World War against us.
        1. Angor
          Angor 2 May 2016 01: 37
          +1
          Bulgarians fought with those who gave the opportunity to return theirs, and no more!
          If you are Russian: your ancestors liberated the Bulgarians because they knew that the letters you write, the prayers for which They prayed were once given for free from the same Bulgarians and did not ask for anything in return.
          If your ancestors found out that you ask for gratitude every 5 minutes, they got up from the grave and both you and ZAHU.S.L.I.
          1. Nikoha.2010
            Nikoha.2010 2 May 2016 01: 46
            +2
            Quote: Angor
            Bulgarians fought with those who gave the opportunity to return theirs, and no more!
            If you are Russian: your ancestors liberated the Bulgarians because they knew that the letters to which you write, the prayers to which They prayed were once given for nothing

            Tsvetomir health I wish you! Well, you're straight philosopher. Touched. Thank! Why do you have so many minuses for the weapons theme? You speak fluently, there are requests, well done!
            1. Angor
              Angor 2 May 2016 03: 25
              0
              Thank you Sergey! You have the same prosperity! For the truth you need to have a strong stomach, not everyone likes it. Here I am gaining ill-wishers :-)
        2. The stranger
          The stranger 3 May 2016 03: 19
          +2
          But you yourself count how many times they revolted - so many times they fought with the Turks in those 500 years. As a collapse for a thousand and miscalculated - so I will help with the links in the archives.
          And even Alexander II had in his mind, freeing the right bank of the Bosphorus. Having occasioned the April Uprising of 1876. Which, due to military losses, and to seizing territory from under the central authority of Istanbul, was essentially a war lost by the Turks. Not to mention the political results that are tantamount to the war we won. The Russian army came two years later, of which we are grateful, this is without a market.
          What went wrong between us is a separate conversation.
          By the way, not only at the end of the 1999th century, the basis of our internal political life was the struggle between Russophiles and Russophobes. And now it’s the same. And by the way - during both world wars, and even partially during Yugoslavia of XNUMX, it was the Russophiles who ruled the ball, including the generals with the army behind us, which didn’t cause disgrace between us. What the Basurman really pushed for.
          I’m just saying that not all that hill is an enemy. And not everything in the newspaper is a friend - a true friend. You and the Turks were friends two years ago, no? And I will never be. They may be to you, and NATO, but to me - the Turks. And for them, the Geneva Convention is not a decree for me, as my ancestors are for them. Cut the bullets with a bayonet ... My grandfather also had official comments for this, and what? I’ll go to sleep myself - what grave will I lie in?
          Do not be scared. The time will come - everything will be. In the meantime, skip nonsense.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Aleksander
        Aleksander April 30 2016 11: 03
        +1
        Quote: stoqn477
        . Fought against Russia after they, together with Romania, entered Dobrudja


        This Bulgaria, together with the Turks and Germans attacked Romania, committing an act of aggression and fighting against the Russians in Dobrudja.
        Newspaper Moscow News, 1916 year:
        "How many insults the Russian popular feeling must have experienced before the long-suffering of the complacent Russian people was exhausted, and they decided to turn away with bitterness from the state they had created, which paid its liberators and all Slavs with black ingratitude, treachery and treason. What a revolution was to happen in the soul of the Bulgarian people freed from the age-old yoke, if he calls for itself as an ally of those very Turks, from which Russia saved him from the final extermination! ».
        1. Angor
          Angor 2 May 2016 03: 14
          +1
          The First World War Bulgaria planned to play back some unresolved territorial issues in the Balkans, including the lands lost in the Second Balkan War, in the cauldron of the First World War. At first, the country declared neutrality, but in September 1915, when a major operation against Serbia was planned, it entered into an alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary. The Entente tried to win Bulgaria to its side and even guaranteed the transfer of the Serbian part of Macedonia, but it was already too late. At first, several Bulgarian divisions successfully operated in the Balkan theater of war, repelled the offensive of the French and British, but they could not solve the problem of neutralizing the already defeated Serbian forces by Austria-Hungary and Germany. After that, Bulgaria fought for about a year with varying success, and at the end of 1916 Romania entered the war, and in 1916 Russia and Romania attacked Bulgaria. There was a fierce battle near the city of Dobrich, the whole city went out to defend, and the Bulgarians won - they forced the Russians and Romanians into Bessarabia on the Seret River, took Bucharest.
        2. The stranger
          The stranger 3 May 2016 02: 25
          +2
          Or maybe you should look at the cards, with the dates of that war? They have long been published.
          Are you sure you will not be ashamed?
      4. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 16: 41
        +3
        Quote: stoqn477
        And how many years did you fight against the enemy that is overwhelming you?

        You ask a question - it would be nice to know the answer. Russia ALWAYS fights against an enemy superior to us. Among which there is usually Bulgaria. Things are heading for war. America needs id.iots who will happily die with the thought "America is with them." According to the comments of distinguished Bulgarians, it is not clear that they will not fulfill their civic duty to Brussels. Is it worth it? You have a vaunted democracy? Or was it true that Comrade Stalin said, referring to Mr. Roosevelt, that democracy is the rule of the American people?
        1. The stranger
          The stranger 3 May 2016 05: 44
          +2
          And why is the enemy ALWAYS superior to the biggest country? And why does Bulgaria usually fight with Russia? Do we have a very long common border? Are our coast washed by one of the five oceans? Since ancient times, have Bulgarians attempted to encroach on Chukchi polar bears?

          Calm down, boy! The other day - May 9th. Then, in 45, near Viena, along with your soldiers, there were Bulgarian soldiers, not Serbian ones. They were not at all in the Soviet army, and there were many Bulgarian ones. As many as two armies, part of the Third Ukrainian Front. My relatives were there too. They returned alive, but crippled. We were proud of what we had done, but did not like the Serbs for the "peace corridor". They served as snipers, before that they were partisans, and they knew the Serbs. The Serbs were shooting in the back while ours were fighting the Nazis. Received mines, under the Drava, and already under Viena.
          And so, for example, a certain General Stoychev, a neighbor from my childhood, is listed in the lists of the Third Ukrainian Front, but I don’t remember Serbian generals.
  9. stoqn477
    stoqn477 April 30 2016 09: 10
    +2
    Poles and they are not Slavs? Why kill each other for centuries? What do you share with them? Whatever we are Serbs. We at least occupied their Serbs after their defeat in the war for 3-4 years, not more than 100 years.
    Serbs until perhaps the middle of the 20th century, was not forgiven for a stab in the back in 1885. Were they Slavs? Why did they attack us? We were not attacked by Turkey and Slavic Serbia. Why? What share with us then?
    1. Comrade Bender
      Comrade Bender April 30 2016 09: 23
      0
      Many, many nations fought with each other. But only a few descended to overt genocide. And do not refer to stabs in the back.
      1. nedgen
        nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 36
        +4
        So I say, before the genocide, the Serbs were the first to descend back in 1913 (Why was it met with bread and salt in Macedonia? And In 1915 and In 1939. Probably because of the very good attitude of the Serbs to the Bulgarians laughing ), and even during the war in Yugoslavia, the Serbs slaughtered themselves with such ecstasy that I wonder right away. And speaking of Serbs, I mean both Croats and Bosnaks and Serbs. They all speak the same language, only some other Orthodox Catholics and the latter are Muslim, but ALL of them speak the same language.
    2. Angor
      Angor 2 May 2016 03: 50
      +3
      September 6, 1885, contrary to the opinion of Russia and most other powers, Bulgaria and the autonomous Turkish province of East Rumelia announced their unification in the city of Plovdiv. This event provoked the Bulgarian crisis. The Austro-Hungarian empire was especially worried about this, as the strengthening of Bulgaria threatened Austrian influence in the Balkans. Austria-Hungary incited Serbia to enter the war with the still fragile principality of Bulgaria, promising Serbia territorial acquisitions in the Western Balkans. Officially, the war began when the Serbian king Milan Obrenović declared war on Bulgaria on November 14, 1885. Serbia hoped that the Ottoman Empire would enter the war on its side. But Turkey did not want to intervene in this conflict, not least because of diplomatic pressure on it from Russia.
  10. ivanovbg
    ivanovbg April 30 2016 09: 20
    +12
    Bulgaria and Bulgarians also have many claims against Serbia, but now is not the time to remember the old grievances.

    While we are gnawing among ourselves, the Turks will rule in Bulgaria and Serbia, and the Americans in Russia. They did very well in Kosovo and in Ukraine, only they will not stop at this, they need all of Russia. Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece and Macedonia, too.

    And you are worried about someone who gave p ... lei 100 years ago.

    In 1885, Serbia also attacked Bulgaria, for no reason at all, simply because Bulgaria was weak and the Serbs hoped to bite off what they could at this difficult time for our country.
    1. SokolfromRussia
      April 30 2016 10: 39
      0
      The first weighted comment that I see here from the Bulgarians. The only moment is how do you explain the recognition of Kosovo? In the very same Bulgaria along the border with Turkey live Muslims. And in Macedonia, Albanians are preparing to create their own education according to the same scenario. Do not you understand what you are doing?
      1. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 21: 33
        +1
        Quote: SokolfromRussia
        The only point is how do you explain the recognition of Kosovo?

        But they will not explain in any way. The Government is doing with them, and they are asking them not to be confused with the Bulgarian government. They only execute orders, and so do not approve these orders. And their government is democratic, that is, elected by the American people.
        1. SokolfromRussia
          April 30 2016 21: 36
          +1
          Yes, if only American. You see where the good half of the Bulgarians wrote from here. Britain, USA, Spain. They all become patriots when they run away over the hill ...
          1. nedgen
            nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 44
            +5
            Well, how do you, dear Falcon, explain to me as simple as you personally allowed NATO to bomb Serbia in 1999? Is it really interfered with somehow? Or, you, too, democracy, then you had a goat Bork after you officially elected to power for a second term? By your logic, you are personally responsible for all the actions of Russia in 1999. hi
            1. 97110
              97110 2 May 2016 11: 36
              +1
              Quote: nedgen
              By your logic, you are personally responsible for all the actions of Russia in 1999.

              And we answer. At least by the fact that again the Bulgarians got the opportunity to bark at Russia in their pack. The world sensed the weakness of Russia, who could have bitten off what they could. This time is gone, it will not work out. You can continue to recall the year 1885 without seeing how Bulgaria perishes under external control. Your country is food for Germans and Americans. A strong Bulgaria would be interesting to Russia as an ally. No Bulgaria is interested in your hosts. So enjoy your journey through their digestive system.
    2. Atomist
      Atomist 2 May 2016 08: 30
      +2
      Correct words. All peoples have moments of history that you can only regret. Now is not the time to fight, unfortunately we have to prepare for war. She’s already going, though for the time being they’re not killing the bodies, but the Souls. Peace to all of us and understanding of each other.
      1. The stranger
        The stranger 3 May 2016 02: 17
        0
        But that's the horror. I was hanging around tanks - it’s comfortable when they’re nearby. And they believed me, trustingly rubbed their feet. Simple and honest. And now, neither tanks, nor fighters - deception and psychiatry are everywhere. On those and the war. Unless to shoot yourself in the temple, and what they teach.
        I don’t shoot like that - I won’t wait. Let's see what they get up to shoot me.
  11. Angor
    Angor April 30 2016 09: 28
    -5
    Just like the first part, the author is lying again! To the first photo: the military uniform on the left does not match the uniform of the Bulgarian army since then! In the second photo Obviously this is a fire victim.
    There is nothing to answer such a lie, except to hope that everyone will judge before accepting words of trust and drawing conclusions.
    1. SokolfromRussia
      April 30 2016 10: 37
      -1
      The first photo is not the Bulgarians, but the members of the International Commission in 1919. Read carefully the captions to the photo before starting a tantrum.
      1. Angor
        Angor April 30 2016 14: 59
        0
        Again, lying there is no signature for the photo. And these corpses can be anyone, including the Macedonians who were killed by the Serbs.
        1. SokolfromRussia
          April 30 2016 15: 40
          -1
          Point the cursor on the photo and see. Everything has to be taught to you ...
  12. Starshina wmf
    Starshina wmf April 30 2016 10: 48
    -2
    Bulgarians were, will be.
  13. but still
    but still April 30 2016 11: 24
    +2
    The author has written so many articles about Serbia, but for some reason there are very few comments in them. A smart move - through articles about the Bulgarians (or rather, by throwing mud at neighbors) to promote their "Serbian line" - and immediately there were a lot of comments bully
    But for some reason, in the news about elections in Serbia last week the author, so energetically promoting the Serbian theme, is silent in a rag ... he is not in the comments request

    News about the pro-European choice of the Serbs:
    http://topwar.ru/94434-itogi-vneocherednyh-parlamentskih-vyborov-v-serbii-serby-
    vybrali-evrointegraciyu.html
    1. Aleksander
      Aleksander April 30 2016 13: 06
      -3
      Quote: but still
      through pouring mud on neighbors


      Refute the above FACTS. Otherwise, it is your comment that looks like dirt. yes
      1. AK64
        AK64 April 30 2016 13: 46
        0
        Refute the facts. Otherwise, it is your comment that looks like dirt. yes


        Between them at that time already three wars took place.
        And it’s hard to find the right ones there: neither side wanted to negotiate, and the Germans (both Austrians and Germans, both) caught fish and incited all the strones.

        So it is not surprising that everything ended with some bitterness.
        It is still surprising that in WWII all this did not continue. And the fact that WWII did not continue should be taken into account by all participants in more merit
        1. SokolfromRussia
          April 30 2016 13: 50
          -1
          Unfortunately, in WWII everything was the same. Bulgaria again occupied the Serbian lands, and its soldiers were equal to fighter from the First World War. The first thing the occupiers did was destroy all the monuments to the victims of the Bulgarian occupation in 1915-1918.
          1. nedgen
            nedgen 1 May 2016 01: 51
            +4
            Of course Vardar Macedonia, where less than 15% of Serbs lived, was originally Sreb laughing ... And who knows why then in 1939 as well as in 1915 the local population of MASOVO greeted the "occupants" with bread and salt. By the way, however, the first thing that the Serbs did after the withdrawal of the Bulgarian army in 1918 and 1945 was massively destroyed military graves and monuments (most of them were erected on donations from local residents)
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Angor
            Angor 2 May 2016 04: 56
            +2
            Just the facts:
            "Macedonia - wrote in 1917 in" Pan-Slavism and French interests "the famous orientalist and historian D. Leger, professor of the College de France, whom scholars from all over the world recognized as their teacher of Slavic issues - Macedonia is almost exclusively inhabited by Bulgarians, although Serbs and Greeks insist on Their claims fall away after the opinions of ethnographers like Legeau, Kipert, Kitich, Grigorovich, Hilferding and Mackenzie. Only after Serbia saw that it had taken away Bosnia and Herzegovina in accordance with the Berlin Treaty, did some of its officials come in the head to demand compensation from Macedonia, and then they began to argue about the existence of Serbs in this country, inhabited exclusively by Bulgarians. "This accurately explains the expansionist aggressive policy of Belgrade towards Bulgaria.

            ... I left Macedonia reddened, ruined. Dissatisfied with what I saw, I heard, I understood, I checked personally - despite the efforts of Belgrade agents, to prevent finding the truth.
            I declare that I am a Frenchman who deeply loves Serbia and has proven his love for twenty years - the people who rule in Macedonia today, these "masters" of Yugoslavia, who are officials, judges, policemen or messengers, they petty their country. .. In Macedonia they confiscate, close, torture, execute, legally kill - systematically, calmly, cruelly.!
            He also has personal observation, methods of torture and murder, I advise you to read them on an empty stomach!
  14. timyr
    timyr April 30 2016 12: 26
    -1
    Alexander 3. Correctly spoke. -All the Balkans are not worth the life of a Russian soldier. Nafig they needed Nicholas 2, climbed into the war because of them, and destroyed the Empire. Or Russia needed a great Serbia. They all stand there for each other.
    1. AK64
      AK64 April 30 2016 12: 57
      +1
      Nafig they were needed by Nicholas 2, climbed into the war because of them, destroyed the Empire.


      (1) Once hit - endured, two hit - endured. Then they will drive them out of the house and leave their wife to themselves.
      (2) It was only pretext: Could not start because of this - we would start because of something else. A pretext would be found.
  15. pytar
    pytar April 30 2016 13: 42
    +9
    This staty, except a manifestation of devilry, cannot be called otherwise! The author elemental speculates with facts in order to turn the RUSSIANS against the Bulgarians! Through a week, a "statyka" will appear in the same spirit against another nation, and so on ... Kolleg, before me, spoke here about the fact that the author of the current article promotes the "Serbian line". I think that the author is simply practicing some kind of anti-Russian line, or he is simply illiterate, ignorant about the things he writes about. As for reality, a lot of blood was shed on the Bolkans. Many atrocities were perpetrated and then especially by the Serbs against their neighbors. Approximate million! Respectively received and in revenge. The local population in those "Serbian" regions where the Bulgarian troops entered, hated the Serbs and often cracked down on the representatives of the Serbian government even before the arrival of the Bulgarian army. I would like to note that Bulgarian and Serbian until 1885 did not fight among themselves for more than 500 years, because for all this time they had a common enemy - the Ottoman Empire! Bulgarian volunteers participated in all Serbian revolts against the Ottomans, and Bulgarian revolts used Serbian territory as a base for training and education. One can safely say that before 1885 the Bulgarian and the Serbs were perceived by each other as brothers! The relationship soured in 1885, when at the most difficult moment for the new history of Bulgaria - the Unification, Serbia treacherously attacked Bulgaria in the back! This was at the moment when the entire Bulgarian army was standing on the border with Turkey and was expecting a Turkish invasion! How wild and criminally this behavior of the Serbian authorities looked even in the eyes of their Serbian people, can be judged by the fact that the Serbian command, having ordered an offensive in Bulgaria, deceived the Serbian soldiers, telling them that they were going to help the Bulgarians against the Turks! Relations between Bulgaria and Serbia finally deteriorated during the Inter-Allied War / 1913 / when Serbia entered into a conspiracy with Greece and, in violation of the General Union Treaty, OUTPATED Macedonia! The outbreak of war led to many casualties and finished off with the South Slavic brotherhood. All that is later is the continuation of these conflicts. But for the difference from Serbia, Bulgaria has not been involved in any wars or conflicts with its neighbors for 70 years and prefers peace and cooperation. Here is the "apple of discord" long-suffering Macedonia has become an independent country! Let them live freely and let them determine their future! We were the first to recognize their independence! This is where our brothers live! And the pendulum, which Serbia once swung, returned to it. The Serbs reacted unjustly and criminally with many of their neighbors, and they themselves received the same thing on their backs. I want to clarify that in my comments I make a difference between the Serbian people, which in their mentality are very, very similar and close to the Bulgarian people and those Serbian rulers and the ruling class who committed these crimes! With static, as it is, only harm is caused to all southern Slavs. The author is a pest and, to his conscience, is a big sin! Our peoples will be friends and live together, since times are different and there is no room for enmity! I wish PEACE, EXPERIENCE AND SUCCESS, BROTHERS - SERBES, BULGARIANS AND RUSSIANS!
    1. AK64
      AK64 April 30 2016 13: 54
      +2
      This staty, except a manifestation of devilry, cannot be called otherwise!


      And by the way, I agree immediately: it is someone who kindles, and kindles intentionally.

      The fact is that from 1878 to the beginning of the WWII in the Balkans, THREE wars took place.
      Everything was wrong there --- just the borders were drawn about, there was no special will to agree, and, most importantly, the Germans incited. (Both Germany and Auto-Hungary, which in this way simply seized control of the region)

      So there are three wars - well, let's say, a lot. And it is not surprising that there was some bitterness of the parties.

      But the matter is the past, and already to WWII there were no such excesses.
      Moreover, in WWII inside Yugoslavia, Serbs and Croats slaughtered each other with much greater bitterness.

      So IMHO you should not inflate events that, thank God, have already been successfully resolved. Everything has already been given to all for this, and you should not foment
      1. SokolfromRussia
        April 30 2016 14: 02
        -1
        By the same logic, let's forget about the Nazi concentration camps ...
        "Whoever hides the past jealously, is out of tune with the future" (c) Tvardovsky.
        1. but still
          but still 1 May 2016 03: 10
          +3
          Quote: SokolfromRussia
          By the same logic, let's forget about the Nazi concentration camps ...
          "Whoever hides the past jealously, is out of tune with the future" (c) Tvardovsky.


          Well, let's talk about concentration camps. About concentration camps under the government of Milan Nedic. I read some articles - in Russian there are no such in the network, or I just could not find, there are such in English. It turns out that this is a relatively new topic - the historian already wrote a book on the topic of Serbian collaboration during WWII ... The topic is very delicate, there is little written about it, but he read on the net that the Belgrade Helsinki Human Rights Committee stated in a 2006 declaration that Jews and the gypsies in Serbia were not only destroyed by the German Nazis, but also the Serbian Nazi collaborators helped ... These things can be read ... You can, of course, say that this is not true, that this is propaganda, etc. etc., and that there were no Serbian SS,
          BUT
          somehow strange, the Serbian government recently (in March of this year) adopted just such a law, which is reported in the news of the Israeli Russian-language media:
          In Serbia, a law came into force according to which Jewish property expropriated by the Nazis and Belgrade authorities during World War II will be transferred to Jewish organizations, The Times of Israel reports.

          it also says:
          Until 1941, about 33 thousand Jews lived in Serbia, but by May 1942, 80% of the Jewish population had been destroyed or exiled to concentration camps by the Nazis and the collaborationist government.


          ... and a collaborative government

          http://newsru.co.il/world/30mar2016/serbia_502.html

          It is amazing how Belgrade in August 1942 became a judenfrey. Even before Berlin. Before the destruction of the Warsaw ghetto ...

          So ... Does the author recall the log in his eye, or about the thief screaming, keep the thief? ...

          We have good neighborly relations with the Serbs, but WHAT the author stirs up ...
      2. Pushkar
        Pushkar April 30 2016 14: 37
        -2
        Quote: AK64


        And by the way, I agree immediately: it is someone who kindles, and kindles intentionally.

        And there’s nothing to rekindle. During the war 08.08. as part of the NATO squadron, a Bulgarian warship also came to our shores. Thus, Bulgaria declared its readiness to fight with Russia.
        1. AK64
          AK64 April 30 2016 15: 24
          +2
          During the war 08.08. as part of the NATO squadron to our shores


          I don’t remember the Bulgarian boat there.
          I remember Polish.

          Well, that's not the point: this detachment even then amused everyone, like "came to fight" good fellows. There was no shock connection, in the event of a real war it would be meat.
          1. Pushkar
            Pushkar 2 May 2016 11: 54
            -1
            There was a Bulgarian "boat". In fact, they were provocateurs, clause 5 of the NATO charter was in effect here - an attack on one NATO member is regarded as an attack on the entire NATO bloc. But if someone wants to consider the Bulgarians as "brothers" and the Banderaites as "fraternal people" - it's your will, but I think differently.
            1. The stranger
              The stranger 3 May 2016 03: 50
              0
              And what, then, Georgia was part of NATO?
              Or did Bulgaria save Georgia from the US from something? So Dzhrdzhiya does not seem to have access to the Bulgarian Ocean ...

              Don’t you think at all, furs ... Geography is a history in the volume of at least the fifth grade to learn, to think of completing a doctor you think. But before the gunner - definitely not necessary.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. V.ic
      V.ic April 30 2016 14: 06
      +1
      Quote: pytar
      Our peoples will be friends and live together, since times are different and there is no room for enmity!

      That's nice, but how? Only for some reason, the "brothers" in the forefront, headlong rushed to NATO / Do the Bulgarians seriously believe that Russia will come to conquer them? /, Srbov is driven into NATO. So in "... twenty years" they will read the original documents and it will turn out that it was like in the Russian Federation, with the second elections in 1995. How can we be friends with you when we are on opposite sides of the no-man's land?
      1. SokolfromRussia
        April 30 2016 14: 08
        +2
        I am generally amazed at their hypocrisy. They fill in here about friendship, but in real life they can only shit. They are supplying weapons to dill, they entered NATO, and they thwarted South Stream. But listen to them, best friends.
    3. 97110
      97110 April 30 2016 16: 55
      +2
      Quote: pytar
      Our peoples will be friends and live together, since times are different and there is no room for enmity!

      Do you see the prospect of Russia's joining NATO? I see Serbia, Bulgaria is already in NATO. We are likely opponents! How should events develop so that the ruling of our countries find themselves in one ...? You are not at all embarrassed that your country is an ally of the United States, which have already used nuclear weapons. Or do you, for example, affected by the Japanese nuclear bombing, do not remember this? I really hope that our peoples will not be friends and live together under the rule of Uncle Sam.
    4. Warrior Hamilton
      Warrior Hamilton 17 October 2016 21: 28
      0
      Quote: pytar
      I want to note that the Bulgarian and the Serbs did not fight among themselves for more than 1885 years until 500, because for all this time they had a common enemy - the Ottoman Empire!
      ............
      It was not an enemy, but your master ... There was a stick over your head, so they mooed in the stall for 500 years ... The Russians turned their necks to the Turks once again, they thought they did a good deed, and you grappled like dogs in the throats friend - to a friend ...... Ay-ay-ay .... Alexander the Third ....... until 1885 it was good, then it was bad ..... Don't need your "Thank you", put on a thong and bring it down with God.....
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. pytar
    pytar April 30 2016 14: 45
    +5
    Quote: SokolfromRussia
    By the same logic, let's forget about the Nazi concentration camps ...
    "Whoever hides the past jealously, is out of tune with the future" (c) Tvardovsky.

    We must not forget about the fascist concentration camps about anything that happened! Not about Srebrenica, not about the Yugoslav death camp "Goli Otok" ... not about those 23 thousand Bulgarians / almost all the Bulgarian intelligentsia in Macedonia /, which in a few days was exterminated in 45 by the titular thugs ... The descendants of those destroyed will not forgive us people. But the shed blood cannot be used as a basis for protecting the future. Since a lot of blood has been shed for everyone. You can't build a new town on the corpses! In Bulgaria, there are entire regions inhabited by refugees from those areas where we fought with the Serbs. So what? Let's give them machine guns and send them revenge on the Serbs ??? Crazy! The solution to the problem is not in confrontation! And the eta state, just confrontational and one-of-a-kind! And how many people have the Serbian authorities killed ?! So ... who needs it? Who benefits from this? ALL comments and articles of the author are in the same vein. You will not envy him ... Sin is so terrible. request
    1. SokolfromRussia
      April 30 2016 14: 52
      0
      Sin is a betrayal by which Bulgaria has paid back for its release. And you fought with us, and joined NATO, and supply weapons to Ukraine. What for? You know, they will kill the civilian population of Donbass and still send to Ukraine.
      It's a sin to be American mongrels ...
      1. stoqn477
        stoqn477 April 30 2016 16: 07
        +2
        They fought with you in the PVM, but not in the WWII. On the contrary, you have declared war on us and have gone bad in Bulgaria.
        Yes, they have joined NATO. And so? We attacked you? I don’t think. But how exactly can we attack you, how do we have no weapons for that? We are not kamikazes.
        For South Stream, as a member of the EU, it has rules that we must follow.
        For deliveries of weapons, can I prove it? It’s true that weapons kill both soldiers and civilians. Can you guarantee that the weapons that Russia supplied did not kill civilians? Why can only the USA and Russia say which deliveries are good and which aren’t?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. nedgen
            nedgen 1 May 2016 02: 12
            +4
            Sorry but this is the facts. Up to 5 sept. 1944 Bulgaria and the USSR were not at war and 5 Sept. 1944, the USSR declared war on Bulgaria and not vice versa. So what? In fact, it was the strangest war. laughing In fact, if I’m not mistaken, not a single shot was fired between the Red Army and the Bulgarian Army. laughing in fact, the Red Army was more likely met as a liberator.
            1. Angor
              Angor 2 May 2016 05: 50
              0
              The liberation from fascism in 1944 on September 8, 1944, the Red Army entered Bulgaria, the anti-fascist pro-communist coalition "Fatherland Front" seized power and appointed its own government. The operation in Bulgaria was presented in Russia as a liberation from fascism, but, firstly, at that time there was no longer a fascist government there, and secondly, nobody prevented the Soviet troops from occupying the territory of the country, so this was the usual establishment of control. For three years, Bulgaria was turned into a state with a communist regime.
    2. 97110
      97110 April 30 2016 16: 59
      -1
      Quote: pytar
      Sin is so terrible

      Do not judge. This is also a sin.
  18. timyr
    timyr April 30 2016 14: 53
    +2
    Quote: AK64
    Nafig they were needed by Nicholas 2, climbed into the war because of them, destroyed the Empire.


    (1) Once hit - endured, two hit - endured. Then they will drive them out of the house and leave their wife to themselves.
    (2) It was only pretext: Could not start because of this - we would start because of something else. A pretext would be found.

    With that level of economy and military industry, and even the Russian army could not be drawn into the war. And on either side.
    1. AK64
      AK64 April 30 2016 15: 15
      +4
      With that level of economy and military industry, and even the Russian army could not be drawn into the war. And on either side.


      (1) You incorrectly assess the economy and industry of the Russian Empire - it was actually more powerful than in the USSR in 1941. This is so - you just need to consider it honestly.
      (2) For peace and friendship, as well as for tango, all sides are needed. And if one of the parties does not want, then there will be no peace ...
      (3) Nikolai Alexandrovich sent several personal telegrams to Willie's cousin. Very good telegrams. Wilhelm's mark on one of them has been preserved: "Do you see? He SHOOT!" That is, Nikolai tried with all his might to keep the peace - but Wilhelm needed a war.
      (4) Russia carried out a feverish modernization of its army. The modernization was to be completed in 1917. The Germans knew about this very well - and therefore they wrote in OWN documents (the documents were preserved): "It is necessary to start a war TODAY, because by the 17th we are with them can't handle."

      And finally
      (5) The Serbs, too, were not eager for war and tried with all their might to appease the Austrians. But the embassy in Belgrade received telegrams "do not make concessions - immediately tighten the requirements for concessions".

      These people needed a war - and they would start it in any situation.
      So do not be fooled.
      1. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 17: 05
        0
        Quote: AK64
        These people needed a war - and they would start it in any situation.

        I completely agree. But remember 2014. The pale woman with a scythe allegedly said that "we will not release Putin alive." And how many were here who wanted to ruin Russia again. Nicholas is accused of not being able to escape the war. Caught, lit ... And the empire was gone. And he could not resign of his own free will, and ruined his family. The burden of the sovereign turned out to be beyond his strength, but they answered with all the people.
        1. Aleksander
          Aleksander April 30 2016 20: 33
          0
          Quote: 97110
          Nikolai is blamed for the fact that he failed to get away from the war. Caught, lit ... And there was no empire.


          Tell me, what did the Emperor and his government do? WHAT they had selection (Schlieffen’s plan, I hope you are familiar)? AS the biggest country WORLD could dodge participating in WORLD war?
          And another question: when they tell you that they will beat and really beat according to their physiognomy, do you stand meekly and smile guilty, so that (God forbid!) Not infuriate the rapist even more?
          1. 97110
            97110 April 30 2016 21: 50
            0
            Quote: Aleksander
            Tell me what the Emperor and his

            And you can not see what has been done in the reporting 2 years? When didn’t Russia come to the war prepared for her? Chezh in 1914, the sovereign father hastened to declare war READY TO WAR Germany, not being ready himself? Chezh climbed into Prussia, outlining his head, without sensible intelligence, but at the head of the Army with his heroes of the Japanese war and specialists in restoring order among his unarmed subjects? I can’t explain anything to you, unfortunately. Because your eyes are blinded by a strange blindness, just created by the main culprits of Russia's troubles in the reporting five hundred years. In your opinion, the main culprits are the Bolsheviks, and the reliable sovereign fell victim to their betrayal? Here I am powerless.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  19. Kaiten
    Kaiten April 30 2016 17: 26
    +4
    Quote: stoqn477
    no WWII


    SS Panzer-Zerstörer Brigade (bulgarische Nr. 1)), known as the Anti-tank Legion - Bulgarian. Armored Legion.
    Fought with the Soviet army in 1945. In one of the battles captured about 30 owls. soldier - he shot some of them.

    P.S. I am very warm towards the Bulgarians, but I don’t like fascists.
    1. but still
      but still 1 May 2016 04: 16
      +1
      Quote: Kaiten
      Quote: stoqn477
      no WWII


      SS Panzer-Zerstörer Brigade (bulgarische Nr. 1)), known as the Anti-tank Legion - Bulgarian. Armored Legion.
      Fought with the Soviet army in 1945. In one of the battles captured about 30 owls. soldier - he shot some of them.

      P.S. I am very warm towards the Bulgarians, but I don’t like fascists.



      The start of hostilities - May 5, 1945 belay You write that they captured about 30 owls. a soldier and some of them were shot. The wikipedia article does not write about the execution of prisoners. Give a link to your source.

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D
      0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0
      %BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0
      %B9%D1%81%D0%BA_%D0%A1%D0%A1_%281-%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1
      %81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%29
    2. Angor
      Angor 2 May 2016 06: 31
      0
      I also treat you very warmly. Thank you for the information! To be honest, I think it was also necessary to mention that the very existence of this military unit is being questioned, people are much more erudite than we are.
  20. timyr
    timyr April 30 2016 17: 54
    +1
    Quote: AK64
    With that level of economy and military industry, and even the Russian army could not be drawn into the war. And on either side.


    (1) You incorrectly assess the economy and industry of the Russian Empire - it was actually more powerful than in the USSR in 1941. This is so - you just need to consider it honestly.
    (2) For peace and friendship, as well as for tango, all sides are needed. And if one of the parties does not want, then there will be no peace ...
    (3) Nikolai Alexandrovich sent several personal telegrams to Willie's cousin. Very good telegrams. Wilhelm's mark on one of them has been preserved: "Do you see? He SHOOT!" That is, Nikolai tried with all his might to keep the peace - but Wilhelm needed a war.
    (4) Russia carried out a feverish modernization of its army. The modernization was to be completed in 1917. The Germans knew about this very well - and therefore they wrote in OWN documents (the documents were preserved): "It is necessary to start a war TODAY, because by the 17th we are with them can't handle."

    And finally
    (5) The Serbs, too, were not eager for war and tried with all their might to appease the Austrians. But the embassy in Belgrade received telegrams "do not make concessions - immediately tighten the requirements for concessions".

    These people needed a war - and they would start it in any situation.
    So do not be fooled.

    As for the war, I agree, but there not only the Germans wanted, but also the French, the Angles. Everyone felt that the vryna would be short. And about VPK Tsarist Russia share. What did the atomic bomb under the tsar, which then Lenin planted a floor on Russia. And the level of the military-industrial complex of tsarist Russia is clear from the fact that rifles could not even provide all the soldiers.
    1. 97110
      97110 April 30 2016 21: 59
      +1
      Quote: timyr
      And the level of the military-industrial complex of tsarist Russia is clear from the fact that rifles could not even provide all the soldiers.

      Well, not only Russia miscalculated with rifles. Another thing is that in Russia there was the worst organization, permissiveness and connivance are amazing. This is with an absolute monarchy! Nicholas II had all the necessary powers, he did not need to conduct something through parliament. But, in addition to embezzlers and bribes, there was no one to manage not only the military-industrial complex, but also the country. In the country, the largest exporter of grain, to allow hunger in the capitals, to achieve hunger riots? Strikes at military factories, lockouts in 1916? It’s good that the Americans did, the Bolsheviks are to blame for everything! Immediately a stone fell from the soul - they found the guilty!
  21. Atigay
    Atigay April 30 2016 19: 50
    +2
    Here I am Kazakh. For me, the Serbs, who are enough in Almaty, that the Russians, the Ukrainians, are all the same. Mentally very close peoples. And Bulgarians, Poles - this is different. Although all, with a certain stretch, can be considered Slavic peoples. Just the manipulation of frank demons by the British, Germans and other Turks turned you into just neighbors. Well, at least learn how to live well next door.
    "Divide and conquer" was not only for you. In 1921, the Uzbeks and I were skillfully turned into different peoples, in general, they did not even understand each other. It always surprised me, until I found out that the state language of the Uzbeks was changed to the Andijan dialect, which is saturated with Tajik. Thanks to academician Barthold. So it was already in the USSR. It turns out so simple: start teaching children a different language, and the people become different. I hope someday the Uzbeks will return to their native language and we will speak, understanding each other.
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 April 30 2016 20: 18
      +1
      After the Mongol invasion of Central Asia in 1219, the ethnogenesis of the population of Central Asia underwent a change. According to the latest genetic genealogy testing from the University of Oxford, the study showed that the genetic impurity of the Uzbeks is intermediate between the Iranian and Turkic peoples with rare Mongoloid elements. According to E.K. Meyendorf in 1820 in the Bukhara emirate from 2,5 million people of the country 1,5 43 million were Uzbeks [1897]. According to the first general census of the population of the Russian Empire in 726, the number of speakers of the Uzbek dialect throughout the Empire (excluding the Bukhara emirate and the Khiva khanate, which were not part of the empire and in whose territory the census was not carried out) amounted to 534 people, in addition, 968 were recorded people as carriers of the Sart dialect [655].

      Back in the 1870s, it was noted that “Uzbeks, no matter what kind of life they lead, all consider themselves to be one people, but are divided into many genera” [45]. According to E.K. Meyendorf who visited Bukhara in 1820: "differing from each other in many ways, Tajiks and Uzbeks have much in common ..." [46]. The common culture of modern Uzbeks and Tajiks is explained by the history of the formation of these peoples. They are based on the same ancient culture of the population of agricultural oases. Those groups native Iranian languages ​​are the ancestors of the Tajiks, and those groups that are native speakers of the Turkic languages ​​- Türks became the ancestors of the Uzbeks

      From Wikipedia.
  22. pytar
    pytar April 30 2016 19: 58
    +5
    Quote: Kaiten
    Quote: stoqn477
    no WWII

    SS Panzer-Zerstörer Brigade (bulgarische Nr. 1)), known as the Anti-Tank Legion - the Bulgarian. Armored Legion. Fought with the Soviet army in the 1945 year. In one of the battles captured about 30 owls. soldier - he shot some of them.

    The name "unit" is threatening, but its make up "representative". After September 44, when Bulgaria declared war on Germany, Himmler, with a propagandistic goal, decided to form a unit of Bulgarians who had fled from Bulgaria and communists, as well as those who lived on the territory of Germany. Gathered a variegated composition of about 500 people in general / no exact data /. Deserted soldiers and a monarchist officer, + about 150 students who studied in Germany / of which 12 are girls from the Vienna Medical Faculty /. They were first collected in Dollersheim. While they were being prepared, half of them deserted. Those who remained staggered along the roads of Austria and Germany until the compound completely disintegrated. The detachment took part in several skirmishes from Soviet units on the territory of Austria. There were also clashes with the Germans because of the ambiguous attitude towards them. It is hardly worth considering how "the participation of the Bulgarians in the war against the USSR" of this confused, desperate group of incomprehensible people roaming the roads of Austria and Germany. Each of them had a personal decision. Moreover, there is almost no reliable information about this part. At the same time, 3 Bulgarian armies with a total strength of 450-500 thousand. soldiers participated on the side of the Soviet army and liberated Yugoslavia, Hungary and Austria. Dead and wounded 32 thousand. of them. Ksati the Germans had Indians, Negro, Arab and all sorts of things that you can think of! As far as I know, there were a lot of Jews in the German army and in the German allies. If we decide to apply the same principle, then it turns out that Russia fought against the USSR on the side of Germany, since Vlasov's army alone numbered several tens of thousands of soldiers. On the other side - and ethnic Germans participated in the Red Army, in the war against Germany! True, they were a little and not on the front line, all the same - they participated. In short, for some, the war was not ethnic, but ideological, for others it was both. So, the fact remains: Bulgaria did not send soldiers to the East and did not participate in the war against the USSR.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Kaiten
      Kaiten April 30 2016 22: 05
      0
      Quote: pytar
      As far as I know, Jews were many in the German army and in the German allies

      Do not confuse Jews and Germans who had Jewish ancestors and according to the Nuremberg laws recognized by the Aryans. Jews were deprived of German citizenship and, accordingly, could not be called to the Wehrmacht.



      Quote: pytar
      Bulgaria did not send soldiers to the East and did not participate in the war against the USSR.

      It's true.

      P.S. The Bulgarians did not send their Jews to German concentration camps, however, they did this with the Yugoslav Jews.
      1. but still
        but still 1 May 2016 05: 19
        +2
        Quote: Kaiten
        P.S. The Bulgarians did not send their Jews to German concentration camps, however, they did this with the Yugoslav Jews.


        Here explain to me, something I can’t understand - here are the Judenrats and Judenpolitsai - were the victims, or what? Were they forcibly forced to become such? Once I read about the Warsaw ghetto, so the German Nazis gave the order to collect a certain number of people at a certain time. Who compiled the lists and determined which of them all to collect? And by what principle? Who collected and escorted these people before the transfer to the Germans? Did the makers of the lists and the escorts know why they were gathering people and where? Explain, please!
        1. Kaiten
          Kaiten 1 May 2016 13: 16
          +2
          Quote: but still
          Here explain to me, something I can’t understand - here are the Judenrats and Judenpolitsai - were the victims, or what?

          They were collaborators, just like the Vlasovites. They tried to curry favor at the expense of their fellow tribesmen, using the camp principle: "today you die, and I will die tomorrow." In any case, in the end they faced the same fate as all Jews, just a little later.
          They also compiled lists for transferring from the ghetto to the camps. I am sure that most of them knew what would happen to those people in the camps. After the war in Israel, several trials took place on this topic, where the accused were Juden policemen, members of the Judenrat and capo from the camps.
          1. but still
            but still 2 May 2016 22: 46
            0
            A very complex and controversial topic.

            I am sure that most of them knew what would happen to those people in the camps.

            From what I read, I think that at the beginning no one knew (the so-called "resettlement" was carefully hidden to avoid riots and uprisings). There were even cases in Western European countries that people were even forced to buy railways for themselves. second class "relocation" ticket. The theater continued at the arrival station - the station is like a train station ... Further to the premises with "shower" signs on the doors. If someone began to suspect something before, and showed it, then he was discreetly taken away and eliminated without noise. So it was in the beginning. This does not apply to Jews from the USSR, who were shot on the spot in the fall of 1941 and did not arrange camouflage performances during transportation.

            As for the Judenrats. The tragedy of hopelessness and powerlessness. Win some time. For the organization of salvation. I’m not justifying anyone. And do not blame.
            It should be especially noted that the idea of ​​the Judenrats “work for life” was supported by the vast majority of the ghetto inhabitants almost unconditionally. Even the fighting underground of the ghetto, constantly in conflict with the Judenrats, in no way objected to their existence and in the vast majority of cases did not oppose them openly - as they well understood the need for their work and all the difficulties of their attempts to continuously save the ghetto [3]

            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82
      2. but still
        but still 2 May 2016 22: 02
        +1
        Quote: Kaiten
        Quote: pytar
        As far as I know, Jews were many in the German army and in the German allies

        Do not confuse Jews and Germans who had Jewish ancestors and according to the Nuremberg laws recognized by the Aryans. Jews were deprived of German citizenship and, accordingly, could not be called to the Wehrmacht.


        The network has a lot of materials on this topic. Especially for you, I picked up an article by an Israeli author on an Israeli site regarding a book published in 2002 by an American with Jewish roots.

        Shimon Briman
        Jewish Hitler Soldiers
        150 thousand soldiers and officers of the Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine could be repatriated to Israel under the Law on Return


        http://www.rjews.net/gazeta/briman1.shtml
      3. but still
        but still 3 May 2016 01: 49
        +3
        P.S. Bulgarians did not send their Jews to German concentration camps, but did so with Yugoslav Jews

        The Bulgarian people, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the Bulgarian government, Bulgarian Tsar Boris 3 managed to save their fellow citizens, Bulgarian Jews, but were powerless to save the Jews - citizens of Yugoslavia occupied by Nazi Germany from deportation. The territories under the administration of Bulgaria were not part of the Bulgarian kingdom, unlike South Dobrudja, reunited with an agreement with Romania in 1940. Tsar Boris 3 paid with his life for refusing to send the Bulgarian army to the eastern front and for refusing to deport his Jewish citizens.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. pytar
    pytar April 30 2016 20: 18
    +2
    _______________________________
    1. pytar
      pytar April 30 2016 20: 18
      +4
      Serbian Prince Pavel Karageorgievich and Hitler / 1940 g. /. At the 25 of March 1941, the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Dragisa Cvetkovich, signed with the sanction of Paul, the Vienna Protocol on the accession of Yugoslavia to the Tripartite Pact.
      1. SokolfromRussia
        April 30 2016 20: 30
        -2
        Yeah, that's just the March 27 coup took place in the country when a crowd of German flags burned on the streets of Belgrade. And a week later, Germany attacked Yugoslavia. Why did you forget to write about it? Oh, you are our friendly?

        But in Bulgaria, the people did not even blather when the country fit into the Reich in the war. Do not try, you will not get rid of the war for the Germans.
        1. pytar
          pytar April 30 2016 21: 15
          +5
          It's true. British intelligence worked very professionally in that case. And I am really friendly to the Serbs. Never - never allowed myself to offend the Serbian people. But personalities as I despise you. You and your libel are harmful to both the Serbs and the Bulgarians, and the Russians too. What else to say ... Whatever one may say, the Serbs are the people closest to the Bulgarians - ethnically and culturally. And here I show the photo as an example - the Yugoslav clique in power was one, but the people wanted something else. Same as in Bulgaria. Of course you’re in your Bulgarian-repertoire repertoire, you lied again. Ask about Sobolev action in 40 year. Under a subscription requiring the conclusion of a mutual assistance agreement / union / with the USSR, 1,5 millions of Bulgarians are signed in a very short time / with a population of less than 5 million / True, it would hardly be expected that the German Sax-Coburgot dynasty, then ruling Bulgaria, would enter would be in union with the Communist USSR. I can’t imagine that. The Yugoslav royal dynasties, too, did not consider how possible an alliance with the USSR. In Yugoslavia, a struggle was waged between two clans - the pro-British and the pro-German. The pro-British made a coup in Belgrade and Germany had to intervene directly.
          1. SokolfromRussia
            April 30 2016 21: 21
            +1
            Enough tales. Pro-British, pro-German. Bulgaria has just been conducting a policy hostile towards Russia, and that says it all.

            You can paint anything here, how you treat everyone well. But you forgive who? The president? Minister what? That's it and that is not. And you decide nothing in Bulgaria. You and you like here can tell a lot how they love Russia, but only Bulgaria as a country will continue to spoil us.

            Join the CSTO, recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia, withdraw recognition of Kosovo, then it will be possible to talk about something. In the meantime, your noodles have not a drop of faith.
            Apparently this! drinks
            1. pytar
              pytar April 30 2016 21: 30
              +7
              Tales UTB you write! Moreover, you have neither skill nor knowledge! And you know ... I still find this useful! Let people see for themselves how elementary people like you are trying to breed them! Russian, Serbian and Bulgarian people are smarter and wiser than you think! They understand and are not led to such an elementary approach! Keep writing nonsense. You already thoroughly discredited yourself.
              1. SokolfromRussia
                April 30 2016 21: 35
                -8
                On the person go? Well done keep it up. Articles about the Bulgarian occupation are written on the studies of authoritative historians, as well as on the original documents.

                Well, the comments here and the evaluation of the article (5 against, 31 for) show that readers consider it quite reliable. You can still spit from anger.
                All the best, my little Bulgarian friend.
                1. pytar
                  pytar April 30 2016 21: 38
                  +6
                  You won’t achieve anything. You are wasting your time. Keep up the good work. laughing
                2. Angor
                  Angor 2 May 2016 14: 28
                  +2
                  SokolfromRussia RU April 30, 2016 21:35 ↑
                  .... Articles about the Bulgarian occupation are written on the research of authoritative historians, as well as on the original documents ...

                  And the links are weak, name the names of these authoritative historians, or at least quotes from these "original" documents!
                  Your article fits the description of entertaining literature from the last page of the yellow press!
            2. 97110
              97110 April 30 2016 22: 11
              -3
              Quote: SokolfromRussia
              Join the CSTO, recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia, recall the recognition of Kosovo,

              To get started, at least hold an anti-government demonstration. Raise your voice for your Eurocent. Nah, this is vigilantly. You have Euro-solidarity.
              1. Angor
                Angor 2 May 2016 14: 31
                +2
                Read the news, boy!
            3. but still
              but still 1 May 2016 03: 40
              +3
              Quote: SokolfromRussia
              Join the CSTO, recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia, withdraw recognition of Kosovo, then it will be possible to talk about something. In the meantime, your noodles have not a drop of faith.


              Did Serbia recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia? Of course not.

              And why do not you require recognition of the Crimea, huh? bully

              I slept completely, a provocateur.
          2. 97110
            97110 April 30 2016 22: 08
            -1
            Quote: pytar
            but the people wanted something else.

            And he did. You do not match.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Waltzman
                Waltzman 3 May 2016 13: 01
                -1
                Tito settled Kosovo by Albanians and was as serboizirovanny hovat as Trotsky or Kaganovich Russian
                come on, sub-fence, retell CNN 1990s further ...
        2. but still
          but still 1 May 2016 03: 57
          +4
          Quote: SokolfromRussia
          Yeah, that's just the March 27 coup took place in the country when a crowd of German flags burned on the streets of Belgrade. And a week later, Germany attacked Yugoslavia. Why did you forget to write about it? Oh, you are our friendly?

          But in Bulgaria, the people did not even blather when the country fit into the Reich in the war. Do not try, you will not get rid of the war for the Germans.


          I forgot to write about the government of Milan Achimovich and Milan Nedich. About the Serbian state guard, police, SS, Letica and Chetniks. About the conversations of Nedicz with Hitler that the Serbs are governing ... How many thousands of Serbs were included in these structures, can you tell?
      2. 97110
        97110 April 30 2016 22: 07
        -4
        Quote: pytar
        Serbian Prince Pavel Karageorgievich and Hitler

        Well done. Come on. Only we know how the Yugoslav people behaved in that war. And we know how you behave. Apparently one German bastard was enough for you to instill a selfless love for the authorities. An order has been given - and they are ready to lay down their heads for the glory of Great Germany. Now to the glory of United Europe. When she is gone - to the glory of Uncle Sam. XX !!!
        1. pytar
          pytar April 30 2016 23: 16
          +5
          Change the numbers, the numbers ... We already know that. laughing Also ... don’t tell us what they’re doing and we won’t tell you where to go ... lol It sounds very funny when people are taken very serially and give advice that no one has asked of them. laughing So ... everything will be fine! Shas, when Serbia calmed down and began to recover, many arsonists do not like this. Someone wants there to be a dream of war, bloodshed and misfortune between the Balkan peoples. For the same purpose, they are furiously trying to turn some against others. They write all sorts of nonsense, dig into history, even dig in toilets to find dirt for some kind of publication. There was so much contradiction between the Balkan peoples that there was always a topic that could oppose them! But nope ... Times have changed! Not the same already! I don’t know how many of those commenting here really have a real idea of ​​the mood and the situation in Bolkanov, but this can only be obtained by traveling and living for some time in these countries. I am fortunately able to do this and often visit almost all Bolcan countries for quite long periods. Recently I was in Kossovo, ksati. Sad naviznost, but Kossovo in the next 100 years is guaranteed not to be Serbia ... Continuing ... Narodny really, somehow grew wiser over the past 20 years and a lot of things have become a thing of the past. Readers no longer have tales about a story in which "everyone except the Serbs is bad". Even in Serbia. People, no matter what nationality and faith, want to live normally and do not want more wars. Few are interested in the opinion of "who is right and who is wrong." Everyday life and personal prosperity come out on top, and progress for the better is possible only with a lasting peace. People understand this very well! Moreover, with fewer restrictions on the borders, the Bolkanovs turn into one common house. Over the past 2-3 years, a huge number of cooperation programs have been carried out between our countries. Even between Serbia and Kossovo, there are such. In fact, all people who lived on Bolkanov, despite their nationality, are similar to one another in terms of mentality and perception. Kultura, obich and everything is overwhelmed here. I am not a seer, but I believe that progress on the difficult path to mutual reconciliation and forgiveness has begun. If external forces do not interfere, our people will heal quite so normally. Our enemies are essentially outside the Balkans. I can see how much the attitude towards the better has changed between Greeks, Bulgarians and Romanians after these countries joined the EU. There is no border and people can freely go Kuza want, Seeing that "there" people are the same as theirs and that people "there" are like them. I am not an adherent of the EU, but freedom of movement within the Union, I consider as a huge benefit for the world.
          1. raif
            raif 1 May 2016 02: 55
            -3
            something hurts smoothly, everything works out for you. "... how much the attitude towards the better has changed between the Greeks, Bulgarians and Romanians, after these countries entered the EU. There is no border and people can freely go Kuza, they will want, Seeing that" there "people are the same as theirs and that people are" there " such as them. I am not a supporter of the EU, but freedom of movement within the union, I consider as a huge contribution for the world. " - after these words, the majority of Russians will consider you not just an adherent, but downright a fan of the EU. and you shouldn't be there separating the people of Bulgaria from the government - that's what they call you "traitorous brothers". you boast that you live there and understand what is happening in the Balkans - well done, no one argues with you on this issue. only here in Russia you, "brothers" have a completely different attitude - I live in Russia, as well as most of your opponents with Russian flags. by the way, listing the happy EU, you forgot to mention the Macedonians. but for some reason they do not live very well with you and the Greeks, especially with the Kosovars (that is, the Albanians), and your Greek friends do not like them so much that the country is not allowed to be called normally. And you smoothly lowered the problem of migrants - feed these parasites, there was an article recently here - at least someone catches these "refugees" and drives them out of Bulgaria. and people like you - the majority, when you communicate here - then "brothers", when with gayropeans - then substitute for them. you are far from the Serbs - during the disintegration of the country they were against the whole of NATO and you, too, were holding out. here Yeltsin-drunk passed them - I admit it myself, without waiting for your "prompts". but our current President corrects the mistakes of the EBN, and you are still oppressed by NATO, the EU and the State Department. By the way, about the supply of weapons from you to Ukrainians and Georgians, you can find it yourself - type 5 words on the topic in your search, instead of writing "novels" about offended Bulgarians here. and I will return to your words about "... and" there "the people are the same as theirs and that the people" there "are like them" - so we, unlike Europe, do not hold pederast parades and are extremely intolerant of pederast priests , incest parents, etc. so you, please, equate only your people with the "enlightened Europeans".
            1. but still
              but still 1 May 2016 03: 20
              +3
              Write, write. BEFORE the Ukrainian events, WHO was talking about the free zone "from Lisbon to Vladivostok," ah? And did you go to rapprochement with the "gayropeans"? Has your memory gone? And until recently we had excellent relations with Turkey! And suddenly she was so bad in a moment ?!
            2. pytar
              pytar 1 May 2016 11: 24
              +6
              To raif - Reading your post, I understand that you have never been to Bulgaria and you have no idea about the real situation. I will give a few explanations going along the lines of your comment. 1.Nothing wrong with freedom of movement between neighboring countries. Everyone recognizes it and everyone likes it. I am really opposed to the EU, but for other reasons. Bulgaria is a country that gave the Eastern Slavs another unique civilizational choice and we have no place in the EU. 2. "Macedonians" are not mentioned, since there is no such people. An invented nation from the Comintern, as a "ukrakh" among other things. I myself am a descendant of the Macedonian Bulgarians and half of my relatives live in Macedonia. The titular clique has muddied a lot of things there, but everything will come to its place and everything will be restored. 3. You raif, as I understand it, you take information from the Internet, where there is all nonsense. I go to all these Balkan countries. Normally people relate to one another. And things get better with time. Nobody wants war and bloodshed. 4.Migrants ... There is no such problem for Bulgaria. The country is a transit country and they don't stay here. We have no more than 7-8 thousand. migrants temporarily residing under the statute. I read an article by Ivan Ivanov about "refugee hunters". 10-15 people "hunters" ?! Do not make me laugh. This is some kind of exotic, which few people in Bulgaria have heard of. 5.Bulgarian society is highly traditional and conservative. Bulgaria was the first of all Slavic countries to accept Orthodoxy. Our partyarchy is quite lively and acts. There is no soil for perverts like those in Western Europe. This will not work with us !!! 6."Arms supplies" and the like ... You know ... criminals !!! Moreover, the Bulgarian and Russian criminals are working together. It would be even more correct if we say that the Bulgarian criminals are under the tutelage of their "older brother" - the Russian criminals. 8.About equating the governors from the peoples. These are completely different things in most countries of the world. Asserting that "peoples and rulers are the same," you raif, disproved himself giving an example from Yeltsin. 9.One more question! You say that Russians treat Bulgarians badly! Not true! You're lying, brazenly! And you know that I live from time to time in Russia and I know perfectly well how Russians treat us! Only some "couch strategists and commentators" treat Bulgarians badly on the Internet. But this is a kind of disease, let psychologists deal with it. In life, Russians and Bulgarians treat each other very well! Fraternal people, definitely! More than half a million Russians live in Bulgaria! With the provision that the entire permanent population of the country is not more than 5 million people. 10.So raifBefore you write some nonsense, think carefully. Well, of course we accept jokes! bully
          2. 97110
            97110 2 May 2016 13: 45
            -3
            Quote: pytar
            our people will heal quite so normally.

            Chained together (NATO),
            soldered by one goal (to plunder and divide Russia).
            Try it. Until Uncle Sam succeeds. He gathered a crowd of sixes, they asked in unison for protection from Russian aggression. You call it "the people will heal quite normally." And we feel the knife at the throat. And we will try to make sure that "the people do not live quite so normally" by robbing Russia for the benefit of the United States. Because the "people" somehow will not understand that the role of cannon fodder is prepared for them in Uncle Sam's script. Thank God, Russia has the right leader. And your people believe in such rhetoric as you are and are heading towards a certain national catastrophe.
            1. but still
              but still 2 May 2016 23: 11
              +3
              In my opinion, you've seen enough of a zombie creator. Would you be outdoors. In the open air.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. pytar
    pytar 1 May 2016 00: 22
    +8


    Megaloschemos (Bulgarian Orthodox chim) Congratulating, for all Orthodox brothers and sister!

    Stefan Mitrovic: Congratulating from Srbiјe, for my brother Bulgaria. Orthodox lived!

    Thanks to Stefan Mitrovic, our Serbian brother!

    Yes, living Orthodoxy, Stefan! Yes, livelier than Serbia! Yes live Bulgaria!
  27. but still
    but still 1 May 2016 02: 31
    +5
    The author of provocations kindles everything, plays with fire ...

    Browse his articles - all about Serbia:
    The first is about Serbian Krajina (!)
    The second is a comparison of events in the Donbass with Serbian events
    Next - again about Serbia (with a minimum number of comments)
    The eighth is about Bulgaria (comments 280 (!))
    The ninth is about Serbia (3 comments, 2 of which are from the author himself)
    Tenth - about Bulgaria (taking into account tomorrow about 100 comments)

    What is the author seeking? It is clear that he purposefully kindles. Considering the fact that last week the Serbs voted for a "pro-European government" in the elections, it turns out that the author's attacks on Bulgarians have nothing to do with the mood of the majority of Serbs or the orientation of the Serbian government.
    What does the author achieve and what kind of project is promoting? Clearly not Serbian. An article about Serbian Krajina, about Donbass ... Russia also does not stand behind it - they tried to drag it into both the Donbass and Karabakh ... The European Union also does not need this - Serbia is already oriented towards European integration. Question: who benefits from this ??? Who needs to shatter the Balkans? And try to drag Russia in?
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 1 May 2016 05: 36
      -3
      What are you going to loose? You are all bonded there, the Germans will tell you! and you’ll lick everything in their ass. As for you and the Serbs, in Russia the Serbs are loved and considered brothers, but they don’t think you are brothers, you can judge the attitude towards you by comments.
      1. but still
        but still 1 May 2016 11: 33
        +5
        Love Serbs, but don’t love us ... crying Right now with the Serbs of jealousy we get into a fight sad
  28. pytar
    pytar 1 May 2016 11: 25
    +5
    Quote: Alibekulu
    Quote: Igor39
    Here is your love and gratitude
    By the way, no one noticed that a rather large faction from Bulgaria was present at VO. Moreover, which is especially contrasting against the background of the complete absence of Serbs request.. Where are you "brothers" ?!
    At the same time, the Bulgarians present are very complimentary to Russia and Russians. And instead of using this foundation to strengthen truly fraternal ties (people's diplomacy), the Great Russians, as always, traditionally manage to, I apologize to "bash" opponents ..
    This is what cannot be taken away from the Great Russians, so this is the ability to mess with others .. Apparently, even the sad results of xoxlossracha do not go for the future. On topvar, as if in a circle, it gets to the clever Belarusians, "traitors" Bulgarians, unreasonable Kazakhs, "Syrian" Tajiks ..
    Although this is the quality that unites them with the Serb bratushki. Those, too, managed to spoil relations with everyone in the district ... wassat


    You are on 100% right! Respect! hi
  29. Cap.Petko
    Cap.Petko 3 May 2016 16: 02
    +1
    Alibekulu - accept my respect, your words are very accurate!

    And for a reason, this is not material, it's nonsense, the author does not know that probably 1/3 of what is now Serbia is the Bulgarian ethnic territory.
    In truth, they didn’t once occupy them, but they stole the land from us.
    Once look at the carte from the 17th, 18th, 19th century, it is clearly visible where the Bulgarian lands are.
    http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/booksBG/Karta_BG_Paisij_1797.GIF

    You can only look at one card, the card that the Russian Empire recognized is a card for the San Stefan Treaty of 1878. On this map you can see that very large cities are now in Serbia, Nis, Bosilegrad, and so on. This is the territory of the Bulgars.

    http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/booksBG/Koledarov_BN2.png

    "Author" if you want to argue with the Russian imperial geographers - then try it, I think that they indicated the Bulgarian lands for sure !!
    1. Alibekulu
      Alibekulu 3 May 2016 17: 32
      +3
      Cap.Petko, pytar, "but still", etc. not in the topic of the article, but about the Bulgarians
      The Bulgarians have left their mark on our football. For a long time, Stanimir Dimitrov played in the regional team for a long time. Until now, many fans are the best defender in the history of the club. I note that Bulgarian coaches have proven themselves super-successfully. Under the leadership of Stanimir Stoilov, for the first time in history, the Kazakhstan club played in the UEFA Champions League group.
      Dimitar Dimitrov, the head coach of Pavlodar “Irtysh” in the absence of adequate funding last year led among the leaders of the championship, although the budget had to stand on the flight.
      In the same year, their clubs took 1-2 places in the champ.
      The popularity of Bulgarian coaches has reached the point that now three Bulgarian specialists are considered as candidates for the Tobol mentor position:
      The greatest chance to lead Kostanay is now 52-year-old Petar Khubchev, who worked until recently with Beroe. Among the candidates for Tobol head coaches are also 51-year-old Alexander Stankov, whose last place of work was Chinese Hunan Billows (many in Bulgaria consider this coach to be the second Stanimir Stoilov) and 59-year-old Stoycho Mladenov, who coached in 2015 for the year Egyptian "El Ittihad" (Alexandria).
      By the way, Stoycho Mladenov called Stanimir Dimitrov saying that if there is an option in Kazakhstan, he will go there boldly.
      http://www.sports.kz/news/tri-bolgarina-pretenduyut-na-post-nastavnika-tobola

      PS. As a child I really liked the film "Khan Asparukh" drinks
      1. but still
        but still 4 May 2016 01: 24
        +2
        Alibekulu, your soul was filled with pride from your words about our coaches! fellow Thank! Goodwill is a typical trait of people in Kazakhstan (I happened to visit Alma-Ata) smile
        And about Asparuh drinks
      2. Cap.Petko
        Cap.Petko 4 May 2016 09: 08
        +2
        Good Den Alibekulu, I wish you a nice and successful den!
        I have one very good-natured friend from Alma Ata, I’m the second Kazakhstani with whom I chat, I’m very nice to talk about different things, and it’s clear that you have an exact opinion.
        I’m very pleased that you’re a fan, I too, and I can say that coach Stoicho Mladenov is very successful, he was great both as a football player in Bulgaria and Portugal, and then he made a very good career both in our country and in Egypt.
  30. Cap.Petko
    Cap.Petko 3 May 2016 16: 22
    +2
    A few more cards from the 19th century.
    Here is a map from the Tsarigrad Conference in 1876 when they decided where the Bulgarian state would be.
    http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/booksBG/Karta_BG_Carigradska_konf.png

    See where the city of Nis is !!

    Here is a map made from Prince Cherskiy from 1877

    http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/booksBG/Karta_Bulg_Knjaz_Tscherkaskij.jpg


    And here the map is made from us, it’s a Bulgarian proposal until the Tsarigrad Conference in 1876, as you can see our offer is almost the same as the Russian imperial geographic friendship, or representatives of the Russian empire - such as Prince Cherkasy!

    http://www.bulgari-istoria-2010.com/booksBG/Karta_BG_BRTCK_1876.GIF
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. AID.S
    AID.S 3 May 2016 23: 56
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    A significant part of the Slavic peoples perfectly adapted to
    Europe. Czechs, Poles, Slovenes. Others in transition

    Sometimes it seems to me that the Russians are not Slavs, because they are not assimilating into Europe, quite simply they never give up and do not betray themselves and their own.
  33. Petrik66
    Petrik66 4 May 2016 11: 44
    0
    But what about the 1 Bulgarian SS anti-tank brigade?
    On May 5, 1945, the commander of the 2nd SS Panzer Corps ordered the brigade to advance from Dollersheim and take up defenses in the northeast of the city of Stockerau, where there was the most tank-dangerous line of defense. During the night of May 5-6, the brigade managed to arrive in the SS division orders

    On the morning of May 6, pilot Pyotr Bochev reported that Soviet troops had gathered at the approaches to the city — tanks with infantry on armor and numerous howitzers. A few hours later he flew out again and did not return - according to some people, he was shot down and died in battle. At 9 o’clock in the morning the first shots began - the Bulgarians collided with units of the very 46th army, which invaded Bulgaria first. It was against her that they began to conduct the most aggressive battles, and this tenacity (as well as the stamina of the German SS men) did not allow the Soviet units to advance to Stockerau. At 6 p.m. the shooting ceased: the Bulgarians destroyed 14 tanks and two self-propelled guns, and in total the 46th Army lost 29 units of armored vehicles. More than a hundred Soviet soldiers died at the hands of Bulgarian legionnaires, thirty were captured. Rogozarov placed the prisoners in the basement of the commercial warehouse, took their clothes and locked them there. Also, the Bulgarians managed to shoot down the Il-2 attack aircraft from the Ofenor anti-tank rifle, which, due to negligence, was down. The loss of the Bulgarians amounted to 98 people killed and 46 missing. The wounded were evacuated to German hospitals, but after they were captured by Russian units, seven people were executed on charges of high treason in Sofia on September 29, 1945 (among them was Georgi Malkov).

    At night, the Bulgarian brigade began to retreat west. Rogozarov ordered the execution of the prisoners, but Lieutenant Khadzhilalchev refused to do this, for which he was demoted to the rank and file, but was not removed from command of his company. The SS units remaining in Stockerau had to hold him for another day (which they did, holding out in the town until May 7), while the command of the 2nd SS Panzer Corps was assigned to the Bulgarian Brigade to occupy and prepare for defense the city of Horn, a key point of the next defensive line of the corps.

    In the last days of the war, the advanced mobile detachment of the 7th division of the Red Army (a division of self-propelled artillery guns, two companies of machine gunners and a sapper unit), commanded by Major I.A.Rapoport and Major M.K. Gordienko, who was ordered to enter the line of connection with the American troops, crossed the Ibbs River in the Kummelsbach region, where the detachment's servicemen captured three serviceable Tiger tanks abandoned by German crews. Putting the captured "tigers" in the vanguard of the column, the detachment continued to move towards the city of Amstetten, while, thanks to the presence of German tanks, the detachment managed for some time to walk alongside the retreating enemy units, catching up and overtaking them. Overtaking the units of the retreating Hungarian division, Rapoport's detachment overtook another group of enemy troops retreating along the road, which consisted of Romanians and Bulgarian SS men, who were trying to surrender to the American army. Seeing on the sides of the self-propelled guns a landing of Soviet submachine gunners, the Romanians and Bulgarians threw their weapons onto the road and fled to the sides
    1. but still
      but still 4 May 2016 14: 46
      +3
      There is a wikipedia article on the stories of surviving legionaries, but the DOCUMENTARY existence of this military unit is NOT CONFIRMED.
      Moreover neither the Bulgarian monarchist government nor the new communist government of Bulgaria formulated this brigadeif it really existed.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D

      0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0

      %BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0

      %B9%D1%81%D0%BA_%D0%A1%D0%A1_%281-%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1

      %81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%29

      With the same success, you can ask the question: "What about the formations of citizens of the USSR who fought against the USSR?"

      Oh, it turns out that Russians in Serbia fought against Titan partisans and Russians of the USSR, it turns out that on the side of Germany belay
      The Russian corps (Russian security corps, the Russian corps in Serbia (German: Russisches Schutzkorps Serbien)) was organized in 1941 after the Nazi occupation of Yugoslavia. At that time, many white officers lived in Yugoslavia. In the summer of 1941, a wave of murders swept through Yugoslavia by Russian Communist partisans emigrants and their families.24 Major General M. F. Skorodumov took the initiative to organize the Russian unit to protect the emigrant population, and on September 12, 1941, he ordered the formation of the Separate Russian Corps, with the consent of the German Colonel Kevish. autonomy of the corps from the German command, which caused a conflict and was soon arrested by the Germans by the Germans, but the formation of the corps, however, continued under the command of another Russian emigrant, Boris Shteifon.

      The corps was mainly used to protect the Yugoslav territory from the communist partisans of Tito. With the Chetniks of Dragolyub Mikhailovich, the corps mainly maintained neutral relations. In 1944, the Germans ordered the corps to cover their withdrawal from Greece. At this time, the corps participated in the battles not only with the Titan partisans, but also with the regular units of the Red Army and its new Romanian and Bulgarian allies. In the winter of 1944-1945, after the creation of the Russian Liberation Army, B. Shteifon met with Vlasov and they agreed to include the corps in the ROA. At this time, the corps retreated to Slovenia.


      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BA%
      D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0
      %B7%D0%BC_%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%92%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D
      0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B5
  34. Cap.Petko
    Cap.Petko 4 May 2016 16: 09
    +1
    Only one thing I want to say, only in Bulgaria, the ruler Tsar Boris III, received gratitude from the Jewish people.
    On 18 05 1994 he was awarded the "Moral Ruler" and "Menorah" awards from the Anti Defamation League, on 20 05 1994 he was awarded the "Flame of Life" and the "Righteous Man of the World and Rescuer of Bulgarian Jews" award. That same year he was awarded a place in the "garden of the righteous."
    Such were our rulers!
  35. Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 28 October 2016 00: 07
    0
    It is strange that the peoples who allegedly experienced genocide, massacre and persecution, languishing under the foreign-Basurman yoke, change so quickly from a peaceful victim, tortured by the yoke, into an invader who inflicts mass reprisals against the civilian population of the captured country and brutally suppresses the slightest protest. Most often, having achieved independence and supposedly freedom with the help of stronger states, these new states, at the slightest opportunity, willingly deal with neighboring, often even kindred peoples and co-religionists in a very similar way (even worse), the way they allegedly treated them by "alien "by faith and origin" invaders "(in their presentation). If you believe in their pitiful stories, which cost Russia several wars, the last, that is, the First World War, became the cause of a real catastrophe for Russia ..
  36. vasilev
    vasilev 6 January 2017 20: 38
    0
    What Serbia, what Bulgaria-Slavs. Normal people are everywhere, just shit always floats on the surface and is the first to catch your eye.
    1. Vladimir 5
      Vladimir 5 19 November 2018 22: 08
      0
      The article is clearly provocative for inciting internecine hostility between the Slavs. To whom such incitement of hostility is beneficial, to the German, Anglo-Saxon peoples, the eternal enemies of the Slavs. Today, Jews do not disdain for their goals in world financial dominance. It’s time to unite the Slavs, for too long we have been enslaved, divided by pitted enemies ...