Military Review

The British Foreign Ministry received a response to statements about "concerns about the situation of human rights in Russia"

126
The British Foreign Office published a report stating that “it is concerned about the human rights situation in the Russian Federation.” According to the representative of the British Foreign Ministry, "there has been a deterioration with respect for human rights in Russia." Representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom quotes RIA News:
We are seriously concerned about the deterioration of the human rights situation in the Russian Federation. And as long as this concern persists, we will continue to call on Russia to fulfill its international obligations to develop and protect human rights.



The British Foreign Ministry received a response to statements about "concerns about the situation of human rights in Russia"


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the state, which still has overseas colonies in which militants of terrorist groups receive training, and which created the conditions for the actual imprisonment of Julian Assandzh, a journalist and founder of the WikiLeaks website, within the embassy of Ecuador, has stated its concern about human rights

The situation with the concerns of the British Foreign Ministry was commented on by the official representative of the main foreign affairs agency of Russia, Maria Zakharova:

It is said (in the report of the Foreign Ministry of Britain) about plans to strengthen stability in the North Caucasus region. And someone in the Russian Federation tried to challenge it? The question is different - where is London? It turns out that the Foreign Office (Foreign Office of Britain) openly declares nothing but interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. At the same time, we somehow forget a little that we solve our internal problems despite the enormous efforts of this particular state, which was largely aimed at destabilizing the situation in our country and specifically in this region. (...)
Who continues to harbor terrorists and those who funded their activities on their territory? The answer is obvious - this is London. Who supported criminal acts, such as Saakashvili, who massacred the civilian population of South Ossetia. The answer is obvious.


Maria Zakharova noted that the statement of the Foreign Ministry of Britain cannot be called an objective understanding of contemporary realities.
Photos used:
www.telegraph.co.uk
126 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ovod84
    ovod84 April 28 2016 06: 44
    +58
    Well done, beautifully shut up the British. Bravo.
    1. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog April 28 2016 06: 50
      +71
      Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!
      1. SuperFly
        SuperFly April 28 2016 07: 06
        -65%
        And he himself was certainly a friend ... just like that he loved everything Russian.
        1. Mahmut
          Mahmut April 28 2016 13: 52
          +8
          British scientists recently made a sensational discovery. It turns out that the concern is not treated with cannabis, but with motherwort.
          1. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 28 2016 19: 41
            -12%
            and most importantly - HOW RESPECT !!!

            then you have to them ... Khomeini would try to tear someone off his beard
          2. Werterex
            Werterex April 28 2016 20: 57
            +6
            It is treated in a cycle ... And bloodletting ... drinks
        2. magosvel
          magosvel April 28 2016 22: 53
          +2
          He loved and built Russia!
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 30 2016 19: 34
            -2
            a copy of Amsterdam is a gay man built on Russian bones
        3. djqnbdjqnb
          djqnbdjqnb April 30 2016 00: 52
          -1
          Quote: SuperFly
          And he himself was certainly a friend ... just like that he loved everything Russian.

          Peter was a patriot of Russia. Love everything Russian and be a patriot of Russia - is it the same thing?
          1. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 30 2016 19: 38
            -1
            Under him, Russia has become anything but Russian. Following Nikon in a Protestant manner, he even abolished the Patriarchate, which then only 250 years later restored only Stalin to the Second World War.
      2. SuperFly
        SuperFly April 28 2016 07: 06
        -42%
        And he himself was certainly a friend - he loved everything Russian right ...
        1. cniza
          cniza April 28 2016 08: 10
          +24
          "Englishwoman - crap" nothing changes, but only confirmed.
          1. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 28 2016 18: 37
            -18%
            There is nothing to translate from American Rockefellers and homegrown brackets to Christian England.
            1. djqnbdjqnb
              djqnbdjqnb April 30 2016 00: 54
              +3
              Quote: SuperFly
              There is nothing to translate from American Rockefellers and homegrown brackets to Christian England.

              Christian England ?! Fear you to God, say that.
            2. zritel
              zritel April 30 2016 14: 59
              0
              Said the Hindu Pakistani.
          2. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 28 2016 18: 37
            -9
            There is nothing to translate from American Rockefellers and homegrown brackets to Christian England.
            1. SMikhalych
              SMikhalych April 29 2016 11: 23
              +6
              Quote: SuperFly
              There is nothing to translate from American Rockefellers and homegrown brackets to Christian England.

              You don't know the story well. Since ancient times, the so-called triumvirate has developed: Great Britain-USA-Vatican. So, the initiator of all world intrigues has always been "Christian England" so adored by you, the performer of these intrigues is the USA, and the Vatican has always been responsible for the ideology. If in doubt, I advise you to pay attention to where three identical Egyptian obelisks are installed. And these are not just three stone steles, but structures with a sacral meaning. In addition, I advise you to pay attention to the entourage around the throne of the Queen of Great Britain and how they are worn around the world with interest in procreation in Great Britain ... But you are not so deeply used to engaging in historical searches, and so, he uttered it and walked away, and like, you don't stand in it all recourse
              1. Signore Tomato
                Signore Tomato April 30 2016 07: 48
                0
                Quote: SMikhalych
                ... and the Vatican was always responsible for ideology. ...


                The Vatican was mainly responsible for the JUSTIFICATION of the actions of the first two - the United States and Small Britain.
                To flock (grazing sheep) thought the way it should the owners of the United States and the United Kingdom.
            2. navigator
              navigator April 29 2016 14: 37
              +5
              Quote: SuperFly
              There is nothing to translate from American Rockefellers and homegrown brackets to Christian England.


              In "Christian" England, symbols of Christianity have long been banned, as they offend the feelings of Muslims who have come in large numbers.
          3. edge
            edge April 29 2016 10: 54
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            "Englishwoman - crap" nothing changes, but only confirmed.

            it is necessary to destroy this island nest of bastard-serpent .....
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Homo
          Homo April 28 2016 08: 21
          +11
          Quote: SuperFly
          And he himself was certainly a friend - he loved everything Russian right ...

          He loved Russia and that which was not in Russia.
          1. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 28 2016 18: 46
            -14%
            And what was not in Russia? Tobacco, tulips and marijuana? There were ships on the White Sea, on the Caspian, on the Amur and the Far East, and even on Svalbard and Alaska.

            Science has always been no worse than that of contemporaries, even better.

            On the White Sea, he ordered them to be burned, and trade began to go through counterparties in Denmark who were paid half the price for the rollback through the Sund.

            This pervert was engaged in ril all Russian and playing with the small Swedes in giveaway for more than 20 years fed them Russian soldiers. Then I bought what I already captured and rebuilt. Just like recently in Chechnya.
            1. Svidetel 45
              Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 37
              0
              Well, not true. there were no ships before Peter, if you do not count for the ships those fragile little ships that were fishing, and let alone the merchant or navy as an organization and system, there’s nothing to say. And what sciences were where these scientific organizations were located in monasteries? I have not heard about it.
              1. BarakHuseynovich
                BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 05: 01
                0
                We need to know more about the history of the White Sea Pomor. The cargo turnover of Arkhangelsk with Europe exceeded its turnover with America and Asia.
                Dezhnev did not go fishing. There was still such Miklouho-Maclay.
                Pomors discovered Svalbard before the Scandinavians.
                Pomors went on naves and kochs, including two-masted ones. They carried mainly grain.
                Instead of these ships burned by him in the White Sea, Peter began to build galleys in the Baltic Sea (just boats for fishing).

                In the monasteries they studied science, just as they did at court. Almost all universities in Europe were attached to monasteries, where Copernicus made his discoveries.
                Did they hear anything about the Ivan the Terrible library, or is there no written language from today until Peter the Great in Russia?
                Only British royal society became non-monastic because Cromwell destroyed all the monasteries in England, and Isaac Newton really spent 95% of his time on alchemy, as he combined the position of secretary there with the position of royal treasurer.

                The first academy of sciences arose under Mikhailo Lomonosov, much later than Peter, this is the Arkhangelsk peasant who came to the capital with his books written in his native Russian.
                Without knowledge of structural mechanics, the Ural factories in pre-Petrine times could not have been built. During the Polish intervention in Russia during the Time of Troubles, the "enlightened Poles" were shocked when they got away with them.
                Free people worked for them - enslaved them like peasants only ... Peter.
                1. BarakHuseynovich
                  BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 07: 04
                  0
                  On the way back, White Sea people usually brought Russian slaves from Europe bought by Italy by Istanbul percupiers from the Crimean Tatars from the Europe to the Russian Kingdom ...
          2. SuperFly
            SuperFly April 28 2016 18: 46
            -5
            And what was not in Russia? Tobacco, tulips and marijuana? There were ships on the White Sea, on the Caspian, on the Amur and the Far East, and even on Svalbard and Alaska.
            Science has always been no worse than that of contemporaries, even better (with the exception of alchemy, which most of his time was occupied by a certain Newton).

            On the White Sea, he ordered them to be burned, and trade began to go through counterparties in Denmark who were paid half the price for the rollback through the Sund.

            This pervert sadist was engaged in ruling everything Russian and playing with the small Swedes in giveaways for more than 20 years he fed them Russian soldiers. Then he bought from them what he had already captured and rebuilt it. Just like recently in Chechnya. Glde 2/3 of the land is not at all Chechen and where the Russians no longer live ...
            1. SuperFly
              SuperFly April 28 2016 19: 03
              -6
              With him, for a long time, Russians were NOT ALLOWED to settle in the Baltic, although the Russians before the occupation by the Crusaders and Swedes lived there before - all cities except Riga were founded by Russians ...
            2. SuperFly
              SuperFly April 28 2016 19: 03
              -5
              Russian with him, and for a long time then NOT ALLOWED to settle in the Baltic States liberated by them, although the Russians lived there before the Crusaders and Swedes — all cities except Riga were founded by Russians ...

              Before the liberation of the Baltic states, a gallows stood in every courtyard of an Ostseen German who was executed by hanging Estonians and Latvians if they could not pay taxes.
        4. nekot
          nekot April 28 2016 08: 47
          +7
          Well, I definitely didn’t like Swedish))))
          1. Lelek
            Lelek April 28 2016 09: 47
            +9
            Quote: nekot
            Well, I definitely didn’t like Swedish


            Well, why? He even loved them very much, and graciously gave the king a kick in the ass with a mocking return of the sword. bully
            1. SuperFly
              SuperFly April 28 2016 19: 50
              -6
              So that he could then come back again and begin to make problems Russian.

              Actually, it was the Turks who released parsley with its headquarters and prostitutes from captivity by tearing diamonds from their ears, and the whole million-strong army of Russian Moldavians went to the Prut campaign of Peter as slaves
              1. djqnbdjqnb
                djqnbdjqnb April 30 2016 01: 09
                +2
                Quote: SuperFly
                So that he could then come back again and begin to make problems Russian.

                Actually, it was the Turks who released parsley with its headquarters and prostitutes from captivity by tearing diamonds from their ears, and the whole million-strong army of Russian Moldavians went to the Prut campaign of Peter as slaves


                You write nonsense from the great hatred of Russia, but you don’t know its history. Not a single Russian soldier was captured as a result of the unsuccessful Prut campaign of Peter I. Moreover, they were released with all weapons and ammunition. Territorial and diplomatic losses - yes, there were, but subsequently all this returned. The peace concluded by Russia and Turkey on the basis of the Prut campaign is an example of how skillful diplomacy can offset military failures. There you go. But for you, everything I said is a revelation, simply put, the first time you hear about it, right?
                1. SuperFly
                  SuperFly April 30 2016 19: 42
                  0
                  Well, you don’t have to lie, especially about the Prut campaign laughing They released only him, his headquarters and their courtesans.

                  In Narva, he also abandoned five times more than the Swedish army, but they could at least partly scatter. Then he tore the bells from the churches to new guns (he did not like, as it should be, the bell ringing).
                  Do you read this about her for the first time?
                  1. Svidetel 45
                    Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 40
                    0
                    Do you work for your beloved Small Britain?
                    1. BarakHuseynovich
                      BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 05: 17
                      0
                      I think against the Westerner Peter
              2. Svidetel 45
                Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 39
                0
                Nya "e need to hang noodles," millionth army ", even Napoleon had only about 600 thousand.
                1. BarakHuseynovich
                  BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 05: 13
                  0
                  Do not hang noodles on your "even Napoleon" whose army, on its territory in Russia, with the participation of Kutuzov's army, the militia of Russian peasants and steppe dwellers poked around with anything almost without the use of firearms, and who also rallied from the Ottomans in Egypt.
                  From Peter's reforms the population has officially decreased by a third, so that "everything fits together."
        5. Rostov Papa
          Rostov Papa April 28 2016 08: 50
          +20
          The British Ministry of Foreign Affairs is surrendering in front of our eyes, we took out the old topic of human rights from the chest with the smell of naphthalene, apparently there is nothing more to say, no creativity.
          1. Armax
            Armax April 28 2016 09: 41
            +9
            Well, nothing has changed since the time of the first English merchants Chancellor and Willoughby who accidentally came to Russia.
            "In 1554, their ship entered the mouth of the Northern Dvina. Ivan the Terrible granted them a diploma, ...", received affectionately and gave the English merchants special, favorable conditions in Russia - duty-free import and trade, etc.
            "Grateful" Englishmen do not forget, they still shit wherever they reach.
          2. Orionvit
            Orionvit April 29 2016 07: 47
            +6
            When I hear the words: human rights, all progressive humanity, the entire world community, democratic values, freedom of speech and so on, I’m sorry to want to at least blame you. A sure sign, if you hear this, means truth in no one eye.
        6. vimati
          vimati April 28 2016 20: 39
          0
          They do not understand your subtle IRONY, but I put you + ...
        7. aleshka
          aleshka April 29 2016 17: 04
          0
          why do you moron flags change ??
      3. just exp
        just exp April 28 2016 07: 15
        +11
        and sending is useless. just beat and beat hard, and most importantly for sure.
        and the fact that someone on mother recalls them, so it’s not warm and sour for them.
        1. Bazilevs81
          Bazilevs81 April 28 2016 08: 14
          +5
          Zakharova answered ... but in the West this is not published ....
        2. DIMA45R
          DIMA45R April 28 2016 08: 19
          +14
          Stop defending yourself, making excuses and being silent! It is necessary to step on, prepare concrete legal evidence, punish the guilty, carry them on the same courts, etc. evidence a lot.
          And do not say: But we know ..... you are bad ... idle talk will not help.
          The best defense is an attack.
          They untwist every scanty thread, but our ropes are lying around and we pose as "not like that" and Dartanyans, shy and shy people. In the info field, go to Brussels, London, Washington and poison each other.
          1. Svidetel 45
            Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 45
            0
            Yes, people are not opposed to advancing, but unfortunately, there are enough in power who are worried about their children somewhere in Oxford or round bills in foreign banks, which is why they mumble, cannot send and answer brutally, but another Britons do not understand the language, they take another language for weakness.
        3. aleshka
          aleshka April 29 2016 17: 06
          0
          two poplars for the whole of Britain
          1. Svidetel 45
            Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 45
            0
            It will not be enough.
      4. Amurets
        Amurets April 28 2016 08: 50
        +7
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

        Even earlier! Since the time of Ivan the Terrible. By deciding to trade with Russia, Queen Elizabeth I and her cabinet planned to oust the Swedes and the Dutch from the Russian market. And also, not knowing that the Northeast Passage is solid ice, they planned their trade routes to India, Japan, and China. .That is, to capture Pomerania with its wealth.
        http://istoriya-ru.ucoz.ru/publ/istorija_rossii/torgovlja_s_angliej_vo_vremena_i
        vana_groznogo / 2-1-0-379
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit April 29 2016 07: 51
          0
          Why is the northeast passage solid ice? As far as I know, the White and Barents Seas do not freeze.
      5. Tatar 174
        Tatar 174 April 28 2016 09: 11
        +9
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

        And not only send but help in every possible way, for example to Argentina, with the return of the Falklands and the sanction to declare Britain for harboring those who committed crimes in Russia ... So what are we waiting for ?! Personally, I have long declared an embargo on them.
      6. WKS
        WKS April 28 2016 09: 38
        +1
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

        A little earlier, since the time of Ivan the Terrible.
      7. silver_roman
        silver_roman April 28 2016 10: 11
        +6
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        more damn since Peter!

        In fact, much earlier. In principle, we cannot be allies. This is our true enemy. Not some enemy there, but a geopolitical enemy. Destroying it from the inside would be an ideal means. Physically destroying it is too simple and too difficult at the same time!
        P.S. Mashenka is just a smart beauty and, in general, a great fellow. I like that she directly says, but does not hide the meaning behind the deep masks.
      8. spravochnik
        spravochnik April 28 2016 12: 02
        +1
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

        Yes, not Peter, but from the time of Ivan the Terrible.
      9. edge
        edge April 29 2016 10: 51
        0
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

        a mistake, from the time of Ivan the Terrible, they were crazy when Ermak brought Siberia to the canopy of the Russian flag
      10. Svidetel 45
        Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 30
        0
        Yes, not from the time of Peter, but from the time of Ivan the Terrible, even then they tried to spoil.
        1. BarakHuseynovich
          BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 05: 27
          0
          It was creeped by Freemasonry having its center for some time there and then having transferred its center to the USA.
          Both countries are conveniently protected because they are separated by water, there you can rebuild and from there spoil the life of other baiting peoples.
    2. Andrey K
      Andrey K April 28 2016 07: 35
      +14
      Technically brought to clean water, that's for sure ...
      With verbiage to cover your stigma, which you really don’t want in a cannon, it’s so aglitsky wassat
    3. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin April 28 2016 07: 48
      +5
      I don’t see any beauty - messy, slurred and extremely soft. A dozen actual examples of outright deceit and the vileness of small Britain could be cited to shut up such attempts, if not forever, then for a long time. And to poke their nose properly, so that in the future there would be no thoughts about their Anglo-Saxon stink in public.
      1. Svidetel 45
        Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 22: 47
        0
        That's right, they only understand. when rude with them.
    4. Imperialkolorad
      Imperialkolorad April 28 2016 07: 56
      +5
      Quote: ovod84
      Malts, beautifully shut up the British. Bravo.

      I completely agree with Zakharova. On my own I’ll add in fact the British leadership does not care about the Russians from the high Tower Bridge completely. Just to condemn and make confusion.
    5. vodolaz
      vodolaz April 28 2016 08: 44
      +1
      I don’t know how to answer, here either I can send to the genitals, or beat in a tambourine)))
      1. ver_
        ver_ April 28 2016 09: 10
        +2
        ... you just don’t need to respond to their concerns at all - the only way you can react - as to an empty place ..
    6. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 April 28 2016 09: 01
      0
      Concerned .......... let them "worry"
    7. GSH-18
      GSH-18 April 28 2016 09: 17
      +2
      We are seriously concerned about the deteriorating human rights situation in the Russian Federation

      And we are worried that they are not worried.
    8. oblako
      oblako April 28 2016 10: 27
      +4
      Why the hell are worried in the West divorced, maybe it's time to concern them with something significant? "Human rights" is the same instrument as "democracy", as "freedom of speech". We know that person, and we also saw what word freedom. And from "democracy" with double, triple or more standards, it makes you feel sick ... As soon as the media, science and culture faithfully began to serve the mammon, democracy, freedom of speech and human rights ended. For example, I am very much concerned about the power of moneybags in the West, and not only in the West ... They have power, but it is not clear that they know what to do with it ...
    9. andrey777
      andrey777 April 28 2016 16: 43
      0
      Quote: ovod84
      Well done, beautifully shut up the British. Bravo.

      Burn Masha !!!
    10. Snow
      Snow April 29 2016 12: 54
      0
      The bad news is that no one is likely to hear us. The words of our spokesperson will be shown only in our own news. On RT, perhaps hope.
    11. Simeon gordyi
      Simeon gordyi April 29 2016 18: 29
      0
      she shut up the non-british, she looked at us in front of us. the British did not notice her statement.
  2. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 28 2016 06: 48
    +7
    Bravo, Masha, bravo !!!
    1. SuperFly
      SuperFly April 28 2016 07: 11
      -34%
      Behind her, Russian Foreign Minister S.V. Lavrov is heard less and less ...
      1. Homo
        Homo April 28 2016 08: 23
        +19
        Quote: SuperFly
        Behind her, Russian Foreign Minister S.V. Lavrov is heard less and less ...

        They have different tasks, Lavrov plans and signs, and Zakharova voices. And she also answers those with whom Lavrov by status is not worth talking! hi
      2. Pavel Tsybai
        Pavel Tsybai April 28 2016 11: 38
        0
        Here you seeer as a Sweater Peter 1 answered, look at the story, understand the kick do not pass.
        1. SuperFly
          SuperFly April 28 2016 18: 35
          -5
          Explain the freedom to a subtle thought ... the anonymizing program puts any flags it wants.
      3. SuperFly
        SuperFly April 30 2016 19: 47
        0
        Quote: SuperFly
        SuperFly SE April 28, 2016 07:11 ↑

        Behind her, Russian Foreign Minister S.V. Lavrov is heard less and less ...

        So many minuses (and not a single plus), and the next day on VO immediately a portrait of Lavrov and an article about him, and not about her.
  3. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod April 28 2016 06: 49
    +6
    The British Foreign Office stupidly fulfills its salary. No objectivity, no facts.
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris April 28 2016 06: 57
      +4
      With what fright they got this pro-naphthalen myth .. It's from the 70s of the last century .. Nothing new has been invented yet.
  4. Teberii
    Teberii April 28 2016 06: 51
    +3
    The British looked after the Caucasus a long time ago when Iran was divided into spheres of influence. And during the Civil War, British troops rushed there.
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 29 2016 08: 00
      0
      British intelligence should also be asked about the murder of Griboyedov. In general, the "big game" has dragged on for a long time, it's time to put an end.
  5. Nymp
    Nymp April 28 2016 06: 57
    +1
    They are looking for a reason for isolation and sanctions, as well as for financing the so-called "containment of Russian aggression."
  6. lotar
    lotar April 28 2016 06: 58
    +2
    England wants to regain its former leadership, but the train left and the next stop, the Multipolar World. Despite the undisguised interference in this process, both the current world leader and his vassals, who know how to yell at the command of the owner from the white house.
    1. Erg
      Erg April 28 2016 08: 12
      +1
      Host at Buckingham Palace. The White House is a "six".
  7. ARES623
    ARES623 April 28 2016 06: 59
    +4
    The British diplomatic office has never expressed its true intentions. It is their tradition to poke their noses everywhere, holding a "stone in their bosom." Moreover, the British have recently had nothing to boast about in productive international relations. But I want to claim power and influence, remembering my irrevocably gone imperial past. There are attempts, but less and less listen to them. And so after all, you can lose the last overseas territories. Today some have scored, tomorrow Argentina will successfully return the Falklands to itself, so soon the Queen of England will be greeted only by airport managers. So this loud bunch was not aimed at human rights, it was a claim to be a "pointing finger." It will soon be bent in the opposite direction .... Sometimes it is a pity that the Russian diplomatic school does not allow you to express yourself directly, without curtsey. Although they will perceive Zakharova's expressions as an insult. Let be.
  8. Saffron
    Saffron April 28 2016 06: 59
    +1
    And at home or in the USA, they can not conduct such studies? Or are the gray-haired researchers coming back?
  9. inkass_98
    inkass_98 April 28 2016 07: 01
    +9
    We are seriously concerned about the worsening human rights situation in the Russian Federation.

    I forgot to name this person laughing
  10. demo
    demo April 28 2016 07: 03
    +3
    Maria Zakharova noted that the statement of the Foreign Ministry of Britain cannot be called an objective understanding of contemporary realities.

    In other words.
    Britain, represented by the Foreign Ministry, cannot really and objectively understand.
    Whatever it is.
    There is a word - incompetence. And there is nonsense.
    You can choose any.
  11. Holsten
    Holsten April 28 2016 07: 25
    +2
    I would like to express my admiration for Maria Zakharova with the words "you are our non-diplomatic". In relation to the Naglo-Saxons, this is the only possible way to communicate - to poke their nose into their own dirty socks.
  12. EvgNik
    EvgNik April 28 2016 07: 33
    +9
    Sorry for the woman’s colleagues for the not entirely correct test (if moderators miss):
  13. EvgNik
    EvgNik April 28 2016 07: 37
    +2
    If the test is not missed, then a memo to Lavrov (just in case, to remember how the "partners" worry about us:
  14. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 April 28 2016 07: 40
    +4
    what are these human rights? I freely read the newspaper from the neighbor’s box and return it back. Try to do it in London or in Washington, they’ll shoot for the newspaper
    1. Werterex
      Werterex April 28 2016 21: 01
      +1
      And if I am with her on a dalnyak? Where is their Tylerance ....))))))
  15. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ April 28 2016 07: 40
    +2
    Well, they poorly understand the features of the Russian language, so the middle finger up them. That’s the whole story.
  16. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 28 2016 07: 44
    +4
    “Concerned about the situation with respect for human rights in the Russian Federation”

    Concerned about? Take a sedative and begin to live humanly and not get into other people's affairs.
  17. krops777
    krops777 April 28 2016 07: 46
    +2
    The situation with the concerns of the British Foreign Ministry was commented by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova


    Masha don’t put a finger in his mouth, he will bite off his elbow.
    1. just exp
      just exp April 28 2016 11: 51
      0
      I wouldn’t put anything else into her mouth.
  18. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya April 28 2016 07: 47
    +2
    This is what the British (rather sexual) concern leads to, such nonsense is not casual, but from "deep" concern! According to the principle: "... they look for a speck in someone else's eye, but they do not notice a log in their own" or, even more accurately, is expressed by the saying: "... whoever hurts, he talks about that", and Maria Zakharova answered this nonsense clearly and clearly!
    1. ver_
      ver_ April 28 2016 09: 15
      0
      ... and what they ask is jumping up - they can’t put them up ..
  19. Thirteenth
    Thirteenth April 28 2016 07: 48
    +1
    There are women in Russian villages laughing
  20. Russia
    Russia April 28 2016 07: 52
    +11
    Dear British Foreign Ministry!
    If you have something constantly
    alarming
    - frustrating
    - sad
    depressing
    - disturbs
    -excites
    - worries
    -cares
    You are not in Russia, you are a psychiatrist! And, most importantly, avoid complications. Otherwise, it threatens with compulsory treatment.
  21. shcishcok
    shcishcok April 28 2016 07: 54
    +1
    well done, Maria! you must often poke their nose into their own flaws, not even more often, but constantly! but, you see, they saw such a mote with us, but they don’t see the logs at home!
  22. Baloo
    Baloo April 28 2016 07: 58
    0
    Please convey to the British Foreign Ministry my very very worried attempts by the British Foreign Ministry to intervene in our internal affairs. Do nothing?
    Soon there will be something, meet ISIS, which the FSA will send you.
  23. Erg
    Erg April 28 2016 08: 18
    0
    What a scumbag! When they impose sanctions, arrange wars near our borders, spoil us in many more ways ... I have a firm belief that the West has gone mad. am
    1. Amurets
      Amurets April 28 2016 09: 30
      +1
      Quote: Erg
      What a scumbag! When they impose sanctions, arrange wars near our borders, spoil us in many more ways ... I have a firm belief that the West has gone mad.

      Well, you don’t need such convictions. The West has gone crazy for a long time. Since the time of Tsar Ivan the Terrible. Since then they do not like Russia. So if Russia let the hordes of Genghis Khan into Europe, then Russia would be a very good state.
  24. solovey
    solovey April 28 2016 08: 25
    0
    How did these Robinsons get along with mattresses and gay Europe !!! Thousands of years have attacked us !!! am
  25. major124
    major124 April 28 2016 08: 27
    +2
    To put it mildly ..... I can’t understand why you can’t say: Dear British partners, our internal affairs are not your Dog business !!!!! Well, or something like that, so that they understand where and for how long they are sent, otherwise all the difficulties of translation and so on ...
  26. DIMA45R
    DIMA45R April 28 2016 08: 39
    0
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    Yes, they don’t need to be shut up! Arrogant Saxons are one of Russia's worst enemies since the time of Peter!

    Clarification, much earlier (always) and the worst enemies (in a civilizational sense, are they all or controlled by them ...)
  27. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat April 28 2016 08: 41
    0
    We must not “make excuses” for the next “publications”, “reviews”, “reports”, “opinions”, but constantly prepare, publish and issue similar reports to the UN and other places in which we constantly remind about the shortcomings, violations, etc. in the EU and the USA.
  28. polite people
    polite people April 28 2016 08: 45
    0
    How softly she said.
  29. sub307
    sub307 April 28 2016 08: 47
    0
    Oh, those "anxious" Englishmen .... They are not tired of pulling this "bagpipe" yet.
  30. Senior manager
    Senior manager April 28 2016 08: 54
    +1
    To their concern, we must write an official note of protest about our concern about the intervention of small Britain in the internal affairs of Russia. At the level of the Security Council, raise the issue of interference, prepare a resolution on the imposition of sanctions (world-class) for states implementing such an intervention. Everything is strictly by the rules. Queen to express dissatisfaction, dismissed subordinates - climb where not getting, Fuckers some.
  31. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam April 28 2016 08: 55
    +1
    The answer seems to be weak. The correct position is probably: “The opinion, concern and the like of a state, in this case Great Britain, grossly violating international human rights treaties, in particular, denying the right to self-determination to the people of the Crimean peninsula, is negligible and cannot be considered. Learn to respect human rights. , contact, in an appropriate acceptable form, we will listen. "
  32. brasist
    brasist April 28 2016 08: 57
    +1
    We are seriously concerned about the deteriorating situation.

    What problems do you take and scratch, and best of all - wash yourself more often.
  33. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 28 2016 09: 02
    +2
    Quote: ovod84
    Well done, beautifully shut up the British. Bravo.

    If the saxophones themselves would not run into, then
    there was no need to shut them up. "Whose cow ...
  34. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 28 2016 09: 06
    0
    Quote: avg-mgn
    Quote: ovod84
    Well done, beautifully shut up the British. Bravo.

    If the saxophones themselves would not run into, then
    there was no need to plug them in. "Whose cow ..."
  35. nobody14
    nobody14 April 28 2016 09: 16
    +3
    If the shavers feel this way and talk about it, then it's time for them to prescribe Afobazol made in Russia.

    The drug has an anxiolytic effect with an activating component that is not accompanied by hypnotic effects (sedative effect is manifested in doses 40-50 times higher than the ED50 for anxiolytic effects). The drug does not have muscle relaxant properties, a negative effect on indicators of memory and attention. With its use, drug dependence is not formed and withdrawal syndrome does not develop.

    The action of the drug is implemented mainly in the form of a combination of anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) and stimulating (activating) effects. Reducing or eliminating feelings of anxiety (preoccupation, bad premonitions, fears, irritability), tension (timidity, tearfulness, anxiety, inability to relax, insomnia, fear), and therefore somatic (muscle, sensory, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal intestinal symptoms), autonomic (dry mouth, sweating, dizziness), cognitive (difficulty concentrating, poor memory) disorders are observed on the 5-7th day of treatment. The maximum effect is achieved by the end of 4 weeks of treatment and persists after drug withdrawal, on average 1-2 weeks. Especially shown is the use of the drug for asthenic individuals in the event of anxiety, insecurity, increased vulnerability and emotional lability, a tendency to emotional-stress reactions.
  36. Rom14
    Rom14 April 28 2016 09: 39
    +3
    Quote: ver_
    ... you just don’t need to respond to their concerns at all - the only way you can react - as to an empty place ..

    Why don't our politicians understand this ??? Why do the Russian media, like hungry chickens, rush at every excrement of the "West" and carry this stench across the world, to savor the population of Russia ?! And one gets the impression -Russia is not a Great country, but like the one from the movie - "I'm not guilty. !!!! ..." You are a huge plus.
  37. Pitot
    Pitot April 28 2016 09: 47
    0
    The centers of Anglo-American civilization generally beguiled the coast. They stick their long noses where they should not. It's time to somehow chop those noses .....
  38. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 28 2016 09: 53
    0
    Well, I’m not a diplomat, so I’ll say briefly - who would mumble ....
  39. Rostislav
    Rostislav April 28 2016 09: 56
    +3
    It’s difficult for a normal person to translate from diplomatic into Russian. Therefore, it often seems that Russia quietly mumbles in response to provocative and sometimes simply boorish statements from the West.
    I agree that Lavrov and Zakharova do not stoop to their manner of speaking and do not try to "cheat the boor", but sometimes I want to give a harsher answer.
    I make an offer to our Foreign Ministry:
    Next to the publication of the official response of Zakharova, place the text of the translation from diplomatic into Russian.
    Sometimes it will be possible to confuse which text to whom, so that the "exceptional" and their henchmen are not forgotten.
    1. Svidetel 45
      Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 23: 03
      0
      But the thing is that the boors understand only boorish language, and therefore we need to communicate with them even more boorishly, I am not a supporter of Khrushchev, but I must give him credit, despite all the weakness (relative) of the military USSR in that period regarding the West, its manner they accepted and spoke well, which made it possible to achieve success in diplomacy.
  40. Alexdragon
    Alexdragon April 28 2016 10: 08
    0
    well done, finally said what they should have heard for a long time)
  41. free
    free April 28 2016 10: 35
    0
    eh would stick in the beard of this English
  42. Taygerus
    Taygerus April 28 2016 11: 07
    +1
    they went with their rights, let them answer for the slave trade and India first, hands unhealthy in blood, well done Zakharova, she sent fine shaves
  43. ver_
    ver_ April 28 2016 12: 16
    +1
    Quote: SuperFly
    And he himself was certainly a friend - he loved everything Russian right ...


    ..the strange passage is a big bunch of minuses. Surely no one sees the caustic irony of the writer ..?
    1. SuperFly
      SuperFly April 28 2016 21: 39
      0
      and how RESPECT! ... and now I ask why do I need such a rear-wheel drive sadist-emperor, the son of a horse-drawn horse? and why and who is creating an advertisement for him that he did something good for Russia?

      not bdsm
      1. Svidetel 45
        Svidetel 45 April 30 2016 23: 05
        0
        Well, if you do not understand. that he did good, then you don’t need to understand, this is your problem, not matured to understand.
        1. SuperFly
          SuperFly 2 May 2016 07: 38
          0
          I’ll understand only when they accept me in the same? lol
          He did nothing good to Russia and Russians, like Yeltsin.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  44. Neobag
    Neobag April 28 2016 12: 27
    0
    Bravo! Finally they began to answer as they should.
  45. Obolensky
    Obolensky April 28 2016 12: 33
    +1
    The fact that our Foreign Ministry answered with a twinkle is good. In diplomatic language, you can dunk your opponent in such a cesspool that hell gets out.

    Correctly said in general. We don't meddle in the internal affairs of the United Kingdom, do we? Why are we not worried? Maybe it's time for us to start? Our people have already tried to "start" somehow, they were immediately told that they were interfering in the internal affairs of a foreign state. So we can't, but they can? Why is it suddenly? Maybe it's time for us to give a decent answer to London and other similar "barkers". And not only to beat the hands, which always stretch. And immediately in the head and in the balls, so that it was more painful and there was no more desire to blurt out something and interfere in the internal affairs of our state. Naturally, in diplomatic language. We are not obliged to give a report to anyone. Let them at least talk about human rights and other things that bother them so much. At home, let them first solve such problems.
    1. Valentina8
      Valentina8 April 29 2016 16: 01
      0
      Good is good, but what's the point? request All the same, they will climb.
  46. cedar
    cedar April 28 2016 14: 18
    +2
    The rationale behind the statement is that not all of humanity is considered a human being by the shaves, only their loved ones and their henchmen. Hence their concern when their sacred right to be gags in all the barrels of their global financial empire, that is, the Commonwealth of "independent" states, where they seem to have rushed to write, after the victory in the Cold War and us, is violated.
    See the root!
  47. Oleg Monarchist
    Oleg Monarchist April 28 2016 14: 48
    +2
    The country, in which there is no constitution, was preoccupied with the rights of humanoffs, and not at home, namely in Russia. I wonder how the situation is with the rights of, for example, Irish people in Soed. Kingdom, and then they are in the North. Ireland sings such songs:



    Which means "British soldiers, sand ... go home" laughing
  48. Aristide
    Aristide April 28 2016 16: 32
    +2
    London, to put it mildly, went nuts under the pressure of Western "values" and the American "human rights" initiative. What is called. you can't see the log in your own eye! For example, "protecting" rights in Northern Ireland (UK). And how these same rights are protected in Turkey, the best friend of the EU and NATO member. But what can we say, the British "human rights activists" believe that human rights are "observed" throughout the world, and only in Russia - no. Such, here, is the English reality.
  49. bear
    bear April 28 2016 17: 01
    +1
    Maria Zakharova is a beautiful, intelligent woman. I wiped my nose with Britons, WISDOM !!!!
  50. tolancop
    tolancop April 28 2016 19: 16
    +2
    Eh ... I had to answer in the style of "Worrying? Don't scratch !!! ...". Let's translate ...
    And if diplomatically, then something like "And Russia has long been worried about the mental abilities of the British foreign ministers, but we do not announce this to the whole world ...".