Military Review

CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

67
Modernization of the Russian underwater fleet the US military command is nervous because new technologies allow Russians to produce almost invulnerable submarines, reports RIA News CNN message.


CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet


“The Soviet submarines had many advantages - they were fast, they dive deeper - but they were also noisy, they were easy to track,” the authors of the article note.

"The new submarines of the" Ash "class will be quiet, what will complicate the situation" for the American fleet.

The article emphasizes that “the strengthening of the Russian Navy’s positions in the Black Sea, in the Eastern Mediterranean, and in the Pacific Ocean is alarming (in Washington) in light of the challenges the US has already faced - such as the growth of the Chinese Navy and the lack of anti-submarine warfare ".

According to the authors, “the number and power of the submarine fleet of Russia so far is inferior to that of the USSR, but the rates of its growth and modernization already create a threat. They are worried about the fact that "the US Navy has declined over the past decades," and their NATO allies "do not have the capacity to develop high-performance technologies for submarines."

"Therefore, military officials have the right to fear (modernization of the Russian fleet) in the context of the current confrontation with Russia," concludes CNN.
Photos used:
bastion-karpenko.ru
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Michael67
    Michael67 April 26 2016 08: 30
    +3
    Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
    I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.
    1. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 April 26 2016 08: 35
      +5
      Type of ship PLARK
      Designation of the project 885 "Ash"
      Developer of the project SPMBM "Malachite"
      Chief Designer V.N. Pyalov
      Codification of NATO "Graney", "Yasen"
      Speed ​​(surface) of 16 knots
      Speed ​​(underwater) 31 knots
      Working immersion depth 520 meters
      Ultimate immersion depth 600 meters [1] [2]
      Autonomy of swimming 100 days
      64 crew
      Cost of K-560 Severodvinsk: 47 billion rubles. [3]
      Kazan: 47 billion rubles. [4]
      Ash-M: ~ 30 billion rubles. [5]
      dimensions
      Surface displacement 8 t
      Underwater displacement 13 t
      The greatest length (on KVL) 139,2 m
      The width of the body naib. 13 m
      Average draft (on design waterline) 9,4 m
      Power point
      Water-water reactor OK-650V,
      One shaft
      One screw.
      weaponry
      Torpedo
      mine armament of 10 533 mm torpedo tubes in the middle of the boat, homing and remote-controlled torpedoes, it is possible to receive mines instead of torpedoes. Torpedoes USET-80, in the future - thermal homing torpedoes "Physicist". Ammunition 30 torpedoes.
      Missile weapons 8x4 PU Onyx, Caliber and planned X-101 (X-102), 3M24.

      I’ll add from myself, I love the designations of our projects Ash, Poplar, etc.
      1. tilovaykrisa
        tilovaykrisa April 26 2016 09: 37
        +2
        and how will a rocket (x101) be installed on a plark if it is aviation-based?
      2. obsudim7
        obsudim7 April 26 2016 11: 12
        -16%
        Where would you be if SMERSH worked well .... And so .. you and whoever is above you (Michael67) with your own (trembling) .. I think you only cause disgust. from normal people .. It is not clear why the FSB still hasn’t removed the assistants of Western intelligence services from this site .. UNCERTAIN .. And why such information bragging does not cause outrage among those who read this .. Probably it is supposed to be more interested in the characteristics of the enemy's products than to lay out the performance characteristics of our equipment .. This can be done either by provocateurs (who still write with mockery .. "correct me if I am wrong") or pure traitors who have gone mad from impunity .. Anyway, all this leads to heavy reflections about our reality ..
        1. Lukich
          Lukich April 26 2016 13: 03
          +5
          Quote: obsudim7
          Where would you be if SMERSH worked well .... And so .. you and who over you (Michael67) with yours (tremble) .. I think you only call omerZeni. in normal people .. It is not clear why the FSB has not yet removed Western intelligence assistants from this site .. UNEXPECTED ..

          and here the hunt for "witches" began laughing
          Quote: obsudim7
          And why such informational bragging does not cause outrage among those who read this .. Probably it is supposed to be more interested in the characteristics of the enemy's products than to lay out the performance characteristics of our technology .. This can be done either by provocateurs (who still write with a mockery .. "correct me if I am wrong") or clean traitors who have gone astray from impunity ..

          what betrayal ???? it's all taken from open sources, from the internet. Secret data in newspapers do not print and do not spread on the Internet. calm you our watchful, there are no spies here laughing
        2. Alex von Dorn
          Alex von Dorn April 26 2016 13: 24
          +2
          An American woman asked me about the Russian Dub missile system. I tell her, I don't know that. She says that she typed in a search engine, and he gave her the result. Well, let them get information about Russian weapons and their performance characteristics from the Internet, this is just for the "oaks".
        3. sgazeev
          sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 29
          0
          Read the Wikipedia, sexot. lol
      3. Kostyar
        Kostyar April 26 2016 11: 41
        +4
        God grant that everything grows together exactly as they fear !!!
      4. Kostyar
        Kostyar April 26 2016 11: 41
        0
        God grant that everything grows together exactly as they fear !!!
    2. Volzhanin2
      Volzhanin2 April 26 2016 08: 38
      +1
      Quote: Michael67
      Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
      I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

      And when did the periscope of the Russian submarine rise in Hudson? When was the last Admiral Starfall at the Pentagon?
      You can see right away that you are an informed person so tell the forum users about these significant events and do not forget about the degree of trembling.
      What the American high-ranking military men say is aimed solely at knocking money out of the budget, but the fact that the Russian submarine fleet is getting stronger and the campaigns and studies go on is only pleasing! It’s just that commentators don’t have to be like censors laughing
      1. WKS
        WKS April 26 2016 08: 56
        +2
        US military "have the right to fear" modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

        They also have the right and are very afraid, howling at the same time, and shake with fear. Nobody is able to take this right from them.
        1. tilovaykrisa
          tilovaykrisa April 26 2016 09: 38
          +5
          They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.
          1. DMB_95
            DMB_95 April 26 2016 10: 41
            +1
            Quote: tilovaykrisa
            They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.

            One does not contradict the other. It even helps.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa April 26 2016 23: 28
            +2
            Quote: tilovaykrisa
            They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.
            They were not afraid of our nuclear submarines, which rattled half the ocean. But, when for the first time death on soft silent paws knocked them in a sturdy case with a package of g / a packages, the PLA pr.971M, which came from nowhere, came from, then ... Then - yes! It became exasperating: the hunter turned into a game!
            Say graciously: well, who might like this?
            And then there was a new misfortune: pl. Pr 885. Which is not heard at 9,0 knots ... This is where it really became reference. And ahead of the 885M project.
            One thing is bad - there are few of them! A dozen of them would be at the Pacific Fleet and the CSF, and there would be no doubt that a powerful analgesic was included in the ration of the command of the US Navy!
            1. tilovaykrisa
              tilovaykrisa April 29 2016 11: 27
              0
              It’s not worth it to keep them (USA) as exiled, it’s a big mistake to underestimate opponents, because they were not afraid to drown our Kursk and we swallowed it, their navy is the first in the world in power and their submarines are formidable, and we regret to the level The USSR is not yet reach, you need to silently develop without noise and dust.
        2. Orionvit
          Orionvit April 26 2016 10: 16
          +1
          They have the right to fear anything, even their wife. Scary to them. A trifle but nice.
          1. Amurets
            Amurets April 26 2016 11: 01
            +1
            Quote: Orionvit
            They have the right to fear anything, even their wife. Scary to them. A trifle but nice.

            Kursk is still not avenged!
            https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=77&msid=22897.27274.1461657372.05499&text=курс
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 26 2016 08: 39
      +1
      According to the authors, “the number and power of the Russian submarine fleet is still inferior to that of the USSR,
      - to say the least! there’s nothing to even compare: data on the composition of the USSR Navy at the end of the 1980s: 64 nuclear and 15 diesel submarines with ballistic missiles, 79 submarines with cruise missiles (including 63 nuclear), 80 multipurpose torpedo nuclear submarines (all data by submarine as of January 1, 1989), four aircraft-carrying ships, 96 cruisers, destroyers and missile frigates, 174 patrol and small anti-submarine ships, 623 boats and minesweeper, 107 landing ships and boats. A total of 1380 warships (not counting auxiliary vessels), 1142 combat aircraft (all data on surface ships as of July 1, 1988).
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 33
        0
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        According to the authors, “the number and power of the Russian submarine fleet is still inferior to that of the USSR,
        - to say the least! there’s nothing to even compare: data on the composition of the USSR Navy at the end of the 1980s: 64 nuclear and 15 diesel submarines with ballistic missiles, 79 submarines with cruise missiles (including 63 nuclear), 80 multipurpose torpedo nuclear submarines (all data by submarine as of January 1, 1989), four aircraft-carrying ships, 96 cruisers, destroyers and missile frigates, 174 patrol and small anti-submarine ships, 623 boats and minesweeper, 107 landing ships and boats. A total of 1380 warships (not counting auxiliary vessels), 1142 combat aircraft (all data on surface ships as of July 1, 1988).

        Seamlessly move from quantity to quality. hi
    4. Blondy
      Blondy April 26 2016 08: 42
      +2
      CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

      Yes, let them be afraid of "health" - who can forbid them? And there would be something to prohibit.
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K April 26 2016 09: 16
        +6
        I think it is their legal right to fear wassat
    5. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex April 26 2016 08: 59
      +2
      The only people who are trying to threaten Russia are afraid of the LAW.
    6. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa April 26 2016 09: 35
      +2
      the tale of the Hudson)) there is still a flag raised at the statue of liberty) do not smack nonsense.
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 36
        -3
        Quote: tilovaykrisa
        the tale of the Hudson)) there is still a flag raised at the statue of liberty) do not smack nonsense.

        Today's appearance of a Russian nuclear submarine a kilometer from Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty caused not only panic in the Pentagon, but also breaking news news and deadly horror that shook all Americans without exception. Opinion polls an hour after the Boreya surfaced showed that the frightened Americans, feeling an unpleasant chill from someone else's military presence in their home and having time to examine the "Russian death machine" in full detail on their shores, require an immediate end to the campaign in Afghanistan, and also curtailing military preparations against Syria and Iran.

        As it turned out, the US Navy simply missed the moment when the Borey submarine, also known as the Project 955, surfaced within line of sight from the US coast. The vaunted US tracking systems did not record the movement of our submarine. According to the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the ascent of our submarine in the immediate vicinity of New York and its entry into the territorial waters of the United States was “Absolutely ridiculous accident. "The navigational instruments of the submarine were denied and, in order to orient, the commander of the submarine was forced to unmask himself and issue a command to ascend."

        Therefore, the General Staff was extremely surprised when the commander attached pictures of the Statue of Liberty and walking tourists on the island of Manhattan to a radiogram with a report on his whereabouts. Http://zema.su/blog/v-prolive-long-ailend-okolo-nyu- iorka-v-ssha-vsply
        la-russkaya-podvodnaya-lodka-proekta-955-bore lol
        1. mav1971
          mav1971 April 26 2016 17: 04
          +2
          Quote: sgazeev
          http://zema.su/blog/v-prolive-long-ailend-okolo-nyu-iorka-v-ssha-vsply
          la-russkaya-podvodnaya-lodka-proekta-955-bore lol


          It’s not funny to put such "spreading cranberries" here?
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa April 26 2016 23: 55
        +1
        Quote: tilovaykrisa
        the tale of the Hudson)

        The tale is a lie. Yes, there’s a hint in it, a lesson for good fellows! (with)
        However, the literary hyperbole about the Hudson's Bay has a very real foundation. At the next battle, (when Secretary General Yu.V. Andropov was in charge), our submarines rubbing along the Atlantic coast of the states were ordered to fly up and show the flag. Amy from helicopters poured some white, extremely persistent muck on the superstructure of boats, which was then difficult to paint over ... Then they dived, torn off from the PLC ...
        In short, such a stickiness had a great public resonance among the Yankees. It was then, reproaching the Pentagon, that the New York Times blurted out that if the Russians wanted, they would pop up near Manhattan.
        The command of the Navy of the Yankees was extremely sensitive to such a statement from such an authoritative publication.
    7. mav1971
      mav1971 April 26 2016 09: 38
      +2
      Quote: Michael67
      according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, it will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.


      When it was? can you at least one example of the "old tradition"?
      Or is it an empty chatter?

      While I see the "old tradition" to lie godlessly about the "old traditions" ...
    8. The black
      The black April 26 2016 10: 05
      0
      CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet
      Indeed they have. Who is arguing? Let even put in his pants laughing The task of our state is not to monitor the state of the NATO combatants' trousers, but to strengthen Russia's defense capabilities.
    9. Lukich
      Lukich April 26 2016 11: 33
      +1
      Quote: Michael67
      according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, it will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

      Well, something like this))
    10. sgazeev
      sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 26
      0
      Quote: Michael67
      Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
      I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

      Something recalled Ancient Greece, how Archimedes passed away, everything began to crumble, morality, common sense and science.
  2. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 26 2016 08: 33
    -2
    And this is just the beginning .... let's see how you sing in 5-10 years when Russia will have a completely updated and modernized fleet in terms of quantity not inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...
    1. 6opogamblu
      6opogamblu April 26 2016 08: 48
      +5
      Do you seriously think that in 5 years the Russian fleet will approach the US Navy in quantity? Have you long compared the pace of construction with us and with them? Or did you mean the PLA Navy?
    2. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 26 2016 08: 51
      +2
      Quote: Alexey-74
      years through 5-10

      You are an incorrigible optimist if you think that even after 10 years we will have
      Quote: Alexey-74
      a completely updated and modernized fleet in quantity is not much inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...

      11 aircraft carriers, how many destroyers are there? ... what
      1. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex April 26 2016 09: 06
        -2
        No, of course, we are "unfortunate", how can we even try to approach the incredible scale of the incredibly powerful army of the one and only (and most importantly - invincible)) God's chosen people, whose mission on earth is universal single rule.
        Do you really think so?????

        Closer and not only closer, but also trample. I will not even say that 11 aircraft carriers, destroyers, etc. floating garbage, for this Russia is not necessary.
        IMHO
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets April 26 2016 09: 26
          +1
          Quote: sdc_alex
          Do you really think so?????

          That in 10 years we will not have 11 aircraft carriers? request Hm, yes. yes
      2. sgazeev
        sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 44
        -2
        11 aircraft carriers, how many destroyers are there? ...
        If you count with those that are standing against the wall and are waiting for remelting. drinks
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 26 2016 09: 02
      +6
      Quote: Alexey-74
      And this is just the beginning .... let's see how you sing years through 5-10 when Russia will have a completely updated and modernized fleet in terms of quantity that is not much inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...
      maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frankly stupid, and someone is adding to the joy of such a "forecast" ... fool in 5 years, at least one destroyer would be made ... you certainly don’t care that the USA has 76, still we are ahead !!!
      1. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex April 26 2016 09: 08
        0
        without the USSR, then, konesh ... well, it will not work.
      2. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn April 26 2016 09: 29
        +3
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frank stupidity, and someone adds to the joy of such a "forecast" ... in 5 years, at least one destroyer was made ... you of course do not care that the United States has 76 of them, that's all we are still ahead !!!

        Well, the other day, the Central Naval Portal analyzed
        According to the Central Naval Portal, the level of combat capabilities of the Russian Navy in 2015 amounted to 44% of the combat capabilities of the US Navy. A year earlier, this indicator was 51,73%, in 2013 - 45,48%, in 2012 - 42,7%.

        But the trouble is that in 2007 the level was 65%. Here we are "approaching". This is the official publication of our Navy, and not some left-wing analogy like Majuzhabar (or whatever it is) or our Feldengauer.
        So it remains to be comforted by all sorts of brave pictures-demotivators, or urapatrioticheskie clips in the style of Mikhan.

        http://flotprom.ru/2016/Рейтинг1/
        1. sgazeev
          sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 50
          0
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frank stupidity, and someone adds to the joy of such a "forecast" ... in 5 years, at least one destroyer was made ... you of course do not care that the United States has 76 of them, that's all we are still ahead !!!

          Well, the other day, the Central Naval Portal analyzed
          According to the Central Naval Portal, the level of combat capabilities of the Russian Navy in 2015 amounted to 44% of the combat capabilities of the US Navy. A year earlier, this indicator was 51,73%, in 2013 - 45,48%, in 2012 - 42,7%.

          But the trouble is that in 2007 the level was 65%. Here we are "approaching". This is the official publication of our Navy, and not some left-wing analogy like Majuzhabar (or whatever it is) or our Feldengauer.
          So it remains to be comforted by all sorts of brave pictures-demotivators, or urapatrioticheskie clips in the style of Mikhan.

          http://flotprom.ru/2016/Рейтинг1/

          Why do we need to tell them everything about the power of the fleets. This is a call to an arms race. Let the mattress mats "rest" on their laurels. We need time to catch up.
          1. Stirbjorn
            Stirbjorn April 26 2016 16: 19
            +1
            Quote: sgazeev
            GDP correctly said, they say, and without aircraft carriers we get it.

            when did GDP say that? wassat
  3. Monos
    Monos April 26 2016 08: 38
    +5
    military officials have the right to fear


    And they actively use this right. wassat
  4. SeregaBoss
    SeregaBoss April 26 2016 08: 41
    0
    Even in Russia you can already hear how in unison 300 million exceptional sphincters are furiously shrinking!
    1. Berber
      Berber April 26 2016 08: 57
      -1
      That's right, but probably not 300, because most of the biomass.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 26 2016 08: 42
    +5
    new technologies allow Russians to produce almost invulnerable submarines

    It is difficult for Americans to break the habit of the 90s, when they considered themselves rulers of the World and arbiters of fate. Get used to the objective reality of the gentlemen of the bourgeois.
  6. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn April 26 2016 08: 42
    +1
    It would be better to improve hydroacoustics and energy, and the American roars - cows and beluga roar! U, sneakers - kalyabedy
  7. Holsten
    Holsten April 26 2016 08: 43
    +7
    There is no way to please the American military: especially for them, the Russian submarines were made quietest, they almost did not rise to the surface — all so as not to bother once again — and they were again not happy.
  8. Berber
    Berber April 26 2016 08: 48
    +2
    Another reason to squeeze money for the US military-industrial complex. Money and corruption rule America. It is like a snake that will eat itself. Do they not see that the politics of recent years are destroying them. After all, there are not fools sitting (or sitting). God probably decided to punish and deprived the mind.
  9. CORNET
    CORNET April 26 2016 08: 51
    +5
    Lately, very little information has been issued about the Russian submarine fleet ... And it's not for nothing that the Yankees are nervous. They are obviously preparing an unexpected surprise (like with "Calibers" on the Caspian Sea ...) And unlike the USSR, I think we will take not the quantity , but quality (I really hope so).
    1. Engineer
      Engineer April 26 2016 09: 27
      +2
      not quantity, but quality ... nda ... Ash is still a Soviet development, if that, then Russia can now only take the number of Ash-trees, and not their quality?
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 52
      0
      Quote: CORNET
      Lately, very little information has been issued about the Russian submarine fleet ... And it's not for nothing that the Yankees are nervous. They are obviously preparing an unexpected surprise (like with "Calibers" on the Caspian Sea ...) And unlike the USSR, I think we will take not the quantity , but quality (I really hope so).

      good drinks For the Russian fleet!
  10. atamankko
    atamankko April 26 2016 08: 55
    -1
    Or else there will be, wait ...
  11. artist-mamluk
    artist-mamluk April 26 2016 08: 57
    +2
    The existence of a degenerative, mentally ill government of the United States, skill is alarming. It is a fact. But NATO doesn’t even bother me, the club of frightened idiots.
  12. cap
    cap April 26 2016 09: 22
    +3
    The fact that the fleet of mattresses is much larger and generally more powerful is beyond doubt.
    I read and marvel at it. Is it really not clear that strength is not in quantity but in quality.
    The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.
    The morale and psychological state of the Russian army is more concerned with the leadership of the Pentagon today.
    Let us recall the beginning of the Second World War, did the Germans have less advantages than NATO now has?
    Hardly.
    Any army is strong in its spirit and readiness for self-sacrifice.
    All talk about the advantage in iron, from the evil one.
    For example, the army of Bashar al-Assad, which opposed and opposes the Saudis.
    Take little Vietnam.
    What other examples? Read the story.
    Respectfully for all opinions hi
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 April 26 2016 09: 43
      +4
      Quote: cap

      The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.



      Again.
      What happened to Cook?
      Just give the primary sources, take the trouble to find them, read it yourself ...
      Do not bring nonsense here from our sites, find the primary sources, pliz ...
      1. BarakHuseynovich
        BarakHuseynovich April 26 2016 14: 22
        0
        Do you like nonsense with American more?
      2. sgazeev
        sgazeev April 26 2016 14: 57
        -1
        Quote: mav1971
        Quote: cap

        The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.



        Again.
        What happened to Cook?
        Just give the primary sources, take the trouble to find them, read it yourself ...
        Do not bring nonsense here from our sites, find the primary sources, pliz ...

        Do not be lazy to type in Yandex, Cook, the Black Sea. Or else bulk in the Black Sea on an American ship under Gorbachev.
    2. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn April 26 2016 16: 22
      0
      Quote: cap
      For example, the army of Bashar al-Assad, which opposed and opposes the Saudis.

      This is the Hussites who oppose the Saudis, even the whole coalition - not a post, but a mess
  13. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee April 26 2016 09: 29
    +4
    Are we going to attack the USA? NOT !
    Why are they so afraid?
    request
  14. Victor-M
    Victor-M April 26 2016 09: 43
    +1
    CNN: US military "have the right to fear"

    Hollywood brought to life. They invent horror stories with their paranoid brains, and what is characteristic is that they themselves bring them to life with their own hands, and then they fight in hysteria. It’s wretched for them not to understand that Russia lives in reality, and not in Hollywood tales about galactic superheroes, who just have to nod their heads and the enemy is defeated. laughing
  15. kirieeleyson
    kirieeleyson April 26 2016 09: 54
    0
    Of course, they have the right to fear, have the right not to answer questions, and also have the right to a lawyer and each of their words can be used against them. One of five Ohio-type boats can go into the open sea, the rest have been moored for 12 years. Scandals among crews and the mass transfer of a submarine to other vessels to get practical knowledge is a common thing, at least they used to go with a buoy and rescuers along the coast, but now that's it. But there are as many as 75 of them (or how many are in the ranks there). Tridents recently pulled out with one, cordoned off 25 miles around so that no one could see this formidable weapon.
  16. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 26 2016 09: 57
    0
    Of course they have both right and left, to whom it is more convenient with which hand. laughing
  17. pavelty
    pavelty April 26 2016 10: 07
    0
    They have the right to fear that they will be taken ...
  18. bvi1965
    bvi1965 April 26 2016 10: 30
    -1
    Quote: Stalker.1977
    Type of ship PLARK
    Designation of the project 885 "Ash"
    Developer of the project SPMBM "Malachite"
    Chief Designer V.N. Pyalov
    Codification of NATO "Graney", "Yasen"
    Speed ​​(surface) of 16 knots
    Speed ​​(underwater) 31 knots
    Working immersion depth 520 meters
    Ultimate immersion depth 600 meters [1] [2]
    Autonomy of swimming 100 days
    64 crew
    Cost of K-560 Severodvinsk: 47 billion rubles. [3]
    Kazan: 47 billion rubles. [4]
    Ash-M: ~ 30 billion rubles. [5]
    dimensions
    Surface displacement 8 t
    Underwater displacement 13 t
    The greatest length (on KVL) 139,2 m
    The width of the body naib. 13 m
    Average draft (on design waterline) 9,4 m
    Power point
    Water-water reactor OK-650V,
    One shaft
    One screw.
    weaponry
    Torpedo
    mine armament of 10 533 mm torpedo tubes in the middle of the boat, homing and remote-controlled torpedoes, it is possible to receive mines instead of torpedoes. Torpedoes USET-80, in the future - thermal homing torpedoes "Physicist". Ammunition 30 torpedoes.
    Missile weapons 8x4 PU Onyx, Caliber and planned X-101 (X-102), 3M24.

    I’ll add from myself, I love the designations of our projects Ash, Poplar, etc.


    Yes Acacia. hyacinth ... romantic. good
  19. Mercenary
    Mercenary April 26 2016 10: 33
    0
    Submarines are understandable, but that mattress covers are not puzzled by "Status-6"? And he will be abruptly and the whole coast kirdyk!
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 April 26 2016 12: 18
      0
      Quote: Mercenary
      Submarines are understandable, but that mattress covers are not puzzled by "Status-6"? And he will be abruptly and the whole coast kirdyk!


      Is it possible?
      Think by yourself...
  20. Vasili09
    Vasili09 April 26 2016 13: 20
    +2
    the articles themselves, as always, are nothing, but the comments are unrealistic, clowns, you’re performing in a circus, one is threatened to come up in Obama’s toilet (well, where else can you go with the broken equipment, that’s the reason the swim, everything broke, floated and got shot by yourself, although maybe this is a duck), the second recalls the advantage of the Nazi troops at the beginning of the war (only interesting in what, well, only in the number of cyclists, the Germans obviously had more)
  21. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 26 2016 13: 27
    0
    Let the States shake with fear and invest, invest money ... Someday there will not be enough money. More likely ....
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 27 2016 00: 15
      +1
      Quote: Alex von Dorn
      There will never be enough money someday. More likely ....

      their damned printing press broke!
      So what? bully
  22. am808s
    am808s April 26 2016 13: 56
    +1
    (military officials have the right to fear (modernization of the Russian fleet) in the context of the current confrontation with Russia)
    Who is pushing them into this confrontation? Live peacefully for yourself, trade and do not shake your nerves yourself and all your neighbors.