CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

Modernization of the Russian underwater fleet the US military command is nervous because new technologies allow Russians to produce almost invulnerable submarines, reports RIA News CNN message.

“The Soviet submarines had many advantages - they were fast, they dive deeper - but they were also noisy, they were easy to track,” the authors of the article note.

"The new submarines of the" Ash "class will be quiet, what will complicate the situation" for the American fleet.

The article emphasizes that “the strengthening of the Russian Navy’s positions in the Black Sea, in the Eastern Mediterranean, and in the Pacific Ocean is alarming (in Washington) in light of the challenges the US has already faced - such as the growth of the Chinese Navy and the lack of anti-submarine warfare ".

According to the authors, “the number and power of the submarine fleet of Russia so far is inferior to that of the USSR, but the rates of its growth and modernization already create a threat. They are worried about the fact that "the US Navy has declined over the past decades," and their NATO allies "do not have the capacity to develop high-performance technologies for submarines."

"Therefore, military officials have the right to fear (modernization of the Russian fleet) in the context of the current confrontation with Russia," concludes CNN.

Comments

[Michael67]

Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

[Stalker.1977]

Type of ship PLARK
Designation of the project 885 "Ash"
Developer of the project SPMBM "Malachite"
Chief designer V.N. Pyalov
NATO codification "Graney", "Yasen"
Speed ​​(surface) of 16 knots
Speed ​​(underwater) 31 knots
Operating depth 520 meters
Maximum diving depth 600 meters[1][2]
The autonomy of swimming 100 day
Crew 64 rights
The cost of K-560 "Severodvinsk": 47 billion rubles.[3]
Kazan: 47 billion rubles. [4]
Ash-M: ~ 30 billion rubles. [5]
dimensions
Surface displacement 8 600 t
Underwater displacement 13 800 t
The greatest length (on KVL) 139,2 m
The width of the body naib. 13 m
Average draft (on design waterline) 9,4 m
Power point
Water-water reactor OK-650V,
One shaft
One screw.
weaponry
Torpedo
mine armament 10 533mm torpedo tubes in the middle of the boat, homing and remote-controlled torpedoes, it is possible to receive mines instead of torpedoes. Torpedoes USET-80, in the future - thermal homing torpedoes "Physicist". Ammunition 30 torpedoes.
Missile weapons 8x4 PU Oniks, Caliber and planned X-101 (X-102), 3M24.

I’ll add from myself, I love the designations of our projects Ash, Poplar, etc.

[tilovaykrisa]

and how will a rocket (x101) be installed on a plark if it is aviation-based?

[discussim7]

Where would you be if SMERSH worked well .... And so .. you and whoever is above you (Michael67) with your own (trembling) .. I think you only cause disgust. from normal people .. It is not clear why the FSB still hasn’t removed the assistants of Western intelligence services from this site .. UNCERTAIN .. And why such information bragging does not cause outrage among those who read this .. Probably it is supposed to be more interested in the characteristics of the enemy's products than to lay out the performance characteristics of our equipment .. This can be done either by provocateurs (who still write with mockery .. "correct me if I am wrong") or pure traitors who have gone mad from impunity .. Anyway, all this leads to heavy reflections about our reality ..

[Lukich]

Quote: obsudim7

Where would you be if SMERSH worked well .... And so .. you and who over you (Michael67) with yours (tremble) .. I think you only call omerZeni. in normal people .. It is not clear why the FSB has not yet removed Western intelligence assistants from this site .. UNEXPECTED ..

and here the hunt for "witches" began

Quote: obsudim7

And why such informational bragging does not cause outrage among those who read this .. Probably it is supposed to be more interested in the characteristics of the enemy's products than to lay out the performance characteristics of our technology .. This can be done either by provocateurs (who still write with a mockery .. "correct me if I am wrong") or clean traitors who have gone astray from impunity ..

what betrayal ???? it's all taken from open sources, from the internet. Secret data in newspapers do not print and do not spread on the Internet. calm you our watchful, there are no spies here

[Alex von Dorn]

An American woman asked me about the Russian Dub missile system. I tell her, I don't know that. She says that she typed in a search engine, and he gave her the result. Well, let them get information about Russian weapons and their performance characteristics from the Internet, this is just for the "oaks".

[sgazeev]

Read the Wikipedia, sexot.

[Kostyar]

God grant that everything grows together exactly as they fear !!!

[Kostyar]

God grant that everything grows together exactly as they fear !!!

[Volzhanin2]

Quote: Michael67

Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

And when did the periscope of the Russian submarine rise in Hudson? When was the last Admiral Starfall at the Pentagon?
You can see right away that you are an informed person so tell the forum users about these significant events and do not forget about the degree of trembling.
What the American high-ranking military men say is aimed solely at knocking money out of the budget, but the fact that the Russian submarine fleet is getting stronger and the campaigns and studies go on is only pleasing! It’s just that commentators don’t have to be like censors

[WKS]

US military "have the right to fear" modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

They also have the right and are very afraid, howling at the same time, and shake with fear. Nobody is able to take this right from them.

[tilovaykrisa]

They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.

[DMB_95]

Quote: tilovaykrisa

They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.

One does not contradict the other. It even helps.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: tilovaykrisa

They’re not afraid, they’re just knocking grandmothers under their navy from the congress.

They were not afraid of our nuclear submarines, which rattled half the ocean. But, when for the first time death on soft silent paws knocked them in a sturdy case with a package of g / a packages, the PLA pr.971M, which came from nowhere, came from, then ... Then - yes! It became exasperating: the hunter turned into a game!
Say graciously: well, who might like this?
And then there was a new misfortune: pl. Pr 885. Which is not heard at 9,0 knots ... This is where it really became reference. And ahead of the 885M project.
One thing is bad - there are few of them! A dozen of them would be at the Pacific Fleet and the CSF, and there would be no doubt that a powerful analgesic was included in the ration of the command of the US Navy!

[tilovaykrisa]

It’s not worth it to keep them (USA) as exiled, it’s a big mistake to underestimate opponents, because they were not afraid to drown our Kursk and we swallowed it, their navy is the first in the world in power and their submarines are formidable, and we regret to the level The USSR is not yet reach, you need to silently develop without noise and dust.

[Orionvit]

They have the right to fear anything, even their wife. Scary to them. A trifle but nice.

[Amurets]

Quote: Orionvit

They have the right to fear anything, even their wife. Scary to them. A trifle but nice.

Kursk is still not avenged!
https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=77&msid=22897.27274.1461657372.05499&text=курс

[Andrey Yuryevich]

According to the authors, “the number and power of the Russian submarine fleet is still inferior to that of the USSR,

- to say the least! there’s nothing to even compare: data on the composition of the USSR Navy at the end of the 1980s: 64 nuclear and 15 diesel submarines with ballistic missiles, 79 submarines with cruise missiles (including 63 nuclear), 80 multipurpose torpedo nuclear submarines (all data by submarine as of January 1, 1989), four aircraft-carrying ships, 96 cruisers, destroyers and missile frigates, 174 patrol and small anti-submarine ships, 623 boats and minesweeper, 107 landing ships and boats. A total of 1380 warships (not counting auxiliary vessels), 1142 combat aircraft (all data on surface ships as of July 1, 1988).

[sgazeev]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

According to the authors, “the number and power of the Russian submarine fleet is still inferior to that of the USSR,

- to say the least! there’s nothing to even compare: data on the composition of the USSR Navy at the end of the 1980s: 64 nuclear and 15 diesel submarines with ballistic missiles, 79 submarines with cruise missiles (including 63 nuclear), 80 multipurpose torpedo nuclear submarines (all data by submarine as of January 1, 1989), four aircraft-carrying ships, 96 cruisers, destroyers and missile frigates, 174 patrol and small anti-submarine ships, 623 boats and minesweeper, 107 landing ships and boats. A total of 1380 warships (not counting auxiliary vessels), 1142 combat aircraft (all data on surface ships as of July 1, 1988).

Seamlessly move from quantity to quality.

[Blondy]

CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

Yes, let them be afraid of "health" - who can forbid them? And there would be something to prohibit.

[Andrey K]

I think it is their legal right to fear

[sdc_alex]

The only people who are trying to threaten Russia are afraid of the LAW.

[tilovaykrisa]

the tale of the Hudson)) there is still a flag raised at the statue of liberty) do not smack nonsense.

[sgazeev]

Quote: tilovaykrisa

the tale of the Hudson)) there is still a flag raised at the statue of liberty) do not smack nonsense.

Today's appearance of a Russian nuclear submarine a kilometer from Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty caused not only panic in the Pentagon, but also breaking news news and deadly horror that shook all Americans without exception. Opinion polls an hour after the Boreya surfaced showed that the frightened Americans, feeling an unpleasant chill from someone else's military presence in their home and having time to examine the "Russian death machine" in full detail on their shores, require an immediate end to the campaign in Afghanistan, and also curtailing military preparations against Syria and Iran.

As it turned out, the US Navy simply missed the moment when the Borey submarine, also known as the Project 955, surfaced within line of sight from the US coast. The vaunted US tracking systems did not record the movement of our submarine. According to the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the ascent of our submarine in the immediate vicinity of New York and its entry into the territorial waters of the United States was “Absolutely ridiculous accident. "The navigational instruments of the submarine were denied and, in order to orient, the commander of the submarine was forced to unmask himself and issue a command to ascend."

Therefore, the General Staff was extremely surprised when the commander attached pictures of the Statue of Liberty and walking tourists on the island of Manhattan to a radiogram with a report on his whereabouts. Http://zema.su/blog/v-prolive-long-ailend-okolo-nyu- iorka-v-ssha-vsply
la-russkaya-podvodnaya-lodka-proekta-955-bore

[mav1971]

Quote: sgazeev

http://zema.su/blog/v-prolive-long-ailend-okolo-nyu-iorka-v-ssha-vsply
la-russkaya-podvodnaya-lodka-proekta-955-bore

It’s not funny to put such "spreading cranberries" here?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: tilovaykrisa

the tale of the Hudson)

The tale is a lie. Yes, there’s a hint in it, a lesson for good fellows! (with)
However, the literary hyperbole about the Hudson's Bay has a very real foundation. At the next battle, (when Secretary General Yu.V. Andropov was in charge), our submarines rubbing along the Atlantic coast of the states were ordered to fly up and show the flag. Amy from helicopters poured some white, extremely persistent muck on the superstructure of boats, which was then difficult to paint over ... Then they dived, torn off from the PLC ...
In short, such a stickiness had a great public resonance among the Yankees. It was then, reproaching the Pentagon, that the New York Times blurted out that if the Russians wanted, they would pop up near Manhattan.
The command of the Navy of the Yankees was extremely sensitive to such a statement from such an authoritative publication.

[mav1971]

Quote: Michael67

according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, it will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

When it was? can you at least one example of the "old tradition"?
Or is it an empty chatter?

While I see the "old tradition" to lie godlessly about the "old traditions" ...

[The black]

CNN: US military "has the right to fear" the modernization of the Russian submarine fleet

Indeed they have. Who is arguing? Let even put in his pants The task of our state is not to monitor the state of the NATO combatants' trousers, but to strengthen Russia's defense capabilities.

[Lukich]

Quote: Michael67

according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, it will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

Well, something like this))

[sgazeev]

Quote: Michael67

Let them tremble that Russia can successfully and quietly protect its maritime borders.
I can imagine another admiral's starfall in Pindagon, when our "Ash", according to the old tradition of the Russian submarine forces, will once again raise the periscope in the Hudson.

Something recalled Ancient Greece, how Archimedes passed away, everything began to crumble, morality, common sense and science.

[Alexey-74]

And this is just the beginning .... let's see how you sing in 5-10 years when Russia will have a completely updated and modernized fleet in terms of quantity not inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...

[6opogamblu]

Do you seriously think that in 5 years the Russian fleet will approach the US Navy in quantity? Have you long compared the pace of construction with us and with them? Or did you mean the PLA Navy?

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Alexey-74

years through 5-10

You are an incorrigible optimist if you think that even after 10 years we will have

Quote: Alexey-74

a completely updated and modernized fleet in quantity is not much inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...

11 aircraft carriers, how many destroyers are there? ...

[sdc_alex]

No, of course, we are "unfortunate", how can we even try to approach the incredible scale of the incredibly powerful army of the one and only (and most importantly - invincible)) God's chosen people, whose mission on earth is universal single rule.
Do you really think so?????

Closer and not only closer, but also trample. I will not even say that 11 aircraft carriers, destroyers, etc. floating garbage, for this Russia is not necessary.
IMHO

[Vladimirets]

Quote: sdc_alex

Do you really think so?????

That in 10 years we will not have 11 aircraft carriers? Hm, yes.

[sgazeev]

11 aircraft carriers, how many destroyers are there? ...
If you count with those that are standing against the wall and are waiting for remelting.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Alexey-74

And this is just the beginning .... let's see how you sing years through 5-10 when Russia will have a completely updated and modernized fleet in terms of quantity that is not much inferior to the US Navy, but much better in quality ...

maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frankly stupid, and someone is adding to the joy of such a "forecast" ... in 5 years, at least one destroyer would be made ... you certainly don’t care that the USA has 76, still we are ahead !!!

[sdc_alex]

without the USSR, then, konesh ... well, it will not work.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frank stupidity, and someone adds to the joy of such a "forecast" ... in 5 years, at least one destroyer was made ... you of course do not care that the United States has 76 of them, that's all we are still ahead !!!

Well, the other day, the Central Naval Portal analyzed

According to the Central Naval Portal, the level of combat capabilities of the Russian Navy in 2015 amounted to 44% of the combat capabilities of the US Navy. A year earlier, this indicator was 51,73%, in 2013 - 45,48%, in 2012 - 42,7%.

But the trouble is that in 2007 the level was 65%. Here we are "approaching". This is the official publication of our Navy, and not some left-wing analogy like Majuzhabar (or whatever it is) or our Feldengauer.
So it remains to be comforted by all sorts of brave pictures-demotivators, or urapatrioticheskie clips in the style of Mikhan.

http://flotprom.ru/2016/Рейтинг1/

[sgazeev]

Quote: Stirbjorn

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

maybe in "fifty?" if only to shout, shkolota ... after all, they are frank stupidity, and someone adds to the joy of such a "forecast" ... in 5 years, at least one destroyer was made ... you of course do not care that the United States has 76 of them, that's all we are still ahead !!!

Well, the other day, the Central Naval Portal analyzed

According to the Central Naval Portal, the level of combat capabilities of the Russian Navy in 2015 amounted to 44% of the combat capabilities of the US Navy. A year earlier, this indicator was 51,73%, in 2013 - 45,48%, in 2012 - 42,7%.

But the trouble is that in 2007 the level was 65%. Here we are "approaching". This is the official publication of our Navy, and not some left-wing analogy like Majuzhabar (or whatever it is) or our Feldengauer.
So it remains to be comforted by all sorts of brave pictures-demotivators, or urapatrioticheskie clips in the style of Mikhan.

http://flotprom.ru/2016/Рейтинг1/

Why do we need to tell them everything about the power of the fleets. This is a call to an arms race. Let the mattress mats "rest" on their laurels. We need time to catch up.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: sgazeev

GDP correctly said, they say, and without aircraft carriers we get it.

when did GDP say that?

[Monos]

military officials have the right to fear

And they actively use this right.

[SeregaBoss]

Even in Russia you can already hear how in unison 300 million exceptional sphincters are furiously shrinking!

[Berber]

That's right, but probably not 300, because most of the biomass.

[rotmistr60]

new technologies allow Russians to produce almost invulnerable submarines

It is difficult for Americans to break the habit of the 90s, when they considered themselves rulers of the World and arbiters of fate. Get used to the objective reality of the gentlemen of the bourgeois.

[Kudrevkn]

It would be better to improve hydroacoustics and energy, and the American roars - cows and beluga roar! U, sneakers - kalyabedy

[Holsten]

There is no way to please the American military: especially for them, the Russian submarines were made quietest, they almost did not rise to the surface — all so as not to bother once again — and they were again not happy.

[Berber]

Another reason to squeeze money for the US military-industrial complex. Money and corruption rule America. It is like a snake that will eat itself. Do they not see that the politics of recent years are destroying them. After all, there are not fools sitting (or sitting). God probably decided to punish and deprived the mind.

[CORNET]

Lately, very little information has been issued about the Russian submarine fleet ... And it's not for nothing that the Yankees are nervous. They are obviously preparing an unexpected surprise (like with "Calibers" on the Caspian Sea ...) And unlike the USSR, I think we will take not the quantity , but quality (I really hope so).

[Engineer]

not quantity, but quality ... nda ... Ash is still a Soviet development, if that, then Russia can now only take the number of Ash-trees, and not their quality?

[sgazeev]

Quote: CORNET

Lately, very little information has been issued about the Russian submarine fleet ... And it's not for nothing that the Yankees are nervous. They are obviously preparing an unexpected surprise (like with "Calibers" on the Caspian Sea ...) And unlike the USSR, I think we will take not the quantity , but quality (I really hope so).

For the Russian fleet!

[atamankko]

Or else there will be, wait ...

[artist-mamluk]

The existence of a degenerative, mentally ill government of the United States, skill is alarming. It is a fact. But NATO doesn’t even bother me, the club of frightened idiots.

[cap]

The fact that the fleet of mattresses is much larger and generally more powerful is beyond doubt.
I read and marvel at it. Is it really not clear that strength is not in quantity but in quality.
The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.
The morale and psychological state of the Russian army is more concerned with the leadership of the Pentagon today.
Let us recall the beginning of the Second World War, did the Germans have less advantages than NATO now has?
Hardly.
Any army is strong in its spirit and readiness for self-sacrifice.
All talk about the advantage in iron, from the evil one.
For example, the army of Bashar al-Assad, which opposed and opposes the Saudis.
Take little Vietnam.
What other examples? Read the story.
Respectfully for all opinions

[mav1971]

Quote: cap

The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.

Again.
What happened to Cook?
Just give the primary sources, take the trouble to find them, read it yourself ...
Do not bring nonsense here from our sites, find the primary sources, pliz ...

[BarakHuseynovich]

Do you like nonsense with American more?

[sgazeev]

Quote: mav1971

Quote: cap

The story of Donald Cook is proof of this.

Again.
What happened to Cook?
Just give the primary sources, take the trouble to find them, read it yourself ...
Do not bring nonsense here from our sites, find the primary sources, pliz ...

Do not be lazy to type in Yandex, Cook, the Black Sea. Or else bulk in the Black Sea on an American ship under Gorbachev.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: cap

For example, the army of Bashar al-Assad, which opposed and opposes the Saudis.

This is the Hussites who oppose the Saudis, even the whole coalition - not a post, but a mess

[Uncle lee]

Are we going to attack the USA? NOT !
Why are they so afraid?

[Victor-M]

CNN: US military "have the right to fear"

Hollywood brought to life. They invent horror stories with their paranoid brains, and what is characteristic is that they themselves bring them to life with their own hands, and then they fight in hysteria. It’s wretched for them not to understand that Russia lives in reality, and not in Hollywood tales about galactic superheroes, who just have to nod their heads and the enemy is defeated.

[kirieeleyson]

Of course, they have the right to fear, have the right not to answer questions, and also have the right to a lawyer and each of their words can be used against them. One of five Ohio-type boats can go into the open sea, the rest have been moored for 12 years. Scandals among crews and the mass transfer of a submarine to other vessels to get practical knowledge is a common thing, at least they used to go with a buoy and rescuers along the coast, but now that's it. But there are as many as 75 of them (or how many are in the ranks there). Tridents recently pulled out with one, cordoned off 25 miles around so that no one could see this formidable weapon.

[Ros 56]

Of course they have both right and left, to whom it is more convenient with which hand.

[pavelty]

They have the right to fear that they will be taken ...

[bvi1965]

Quote: Stalker.1977

Type of ship PLARK
Designation of the project 885 "Ash"
Developer of the project SPMBM "Malachite"
Chief designer V.N. Pyalov
NATO codification "Graney", "Yasen"
Speed ​​(surface) of 16 knots
Speed ​​(underwater) 31 knots
Operating depth 520 meters
Maximum diving depth 600 meters[1][2]
The autonomy of swimming 100 day
Crew 64 rights
The cost of K-560 "Severodvinsk": 47 billion rubles.[3]
Kazan: 47 billion rubles. [4]
Ash-M: ~ 30 billion rubles. [5]
dimensions
Surface displacement 8 600 t
Underwater displacement 13 800 t
The greatest length (on KVL) 139,2 m
The width of the body naib. 13 m
Average draft (on design waterline) 9,4 m
Power point
Water-water reactor OK-650V,
One shaft
One screw.
weaponry
Torpedo
mine armament 10 533mm torpedo tubes in the middle of the boat, homing and remote-controlled torpedoes, it is possible to receive mines instead of torpedoes. Torpedoes USET-80, in the future - thermal homing torpedoes "Physicist". Ammunition 30 torpedoes.
Missile weapons 8x4 PU Oniks, Caliber and planned X-101 (X-102), 3M24.

I’ll add from myself, I love the designations of our projects Ash, Poplar, etc.

Yes Acacia. hyacinth ... romantic.

[Mercenary]

Submarines are understandable, but that mattress covers are not puzzled by "Status-6"? And he will be abruptly and the whole coast kirdyk!

[mav1971]

Quote: Mercenary

Submarines are understandable, but that mattress covers are not puzzled by "Status-6"? And he will be abruptly and the whole coast kirdyk!

Is it possible?
Think by yourself...

[Vasili09]

the articles themselves, as always, are nothing, but the comments are unrealistic, clowns, you’re performing in a circus, one is threatened to come up in Obama’s toilet (well, where else can you go with the broken equipment, that’s the reason the swim, everything broke, floated and got shot by yourself, although maybe this is a duck), the second recalls the advantage of the Nazi troops at the beginning of the war (only interesting in what, well, only in the number of cyclists, the Germans obviously had more)

[Alex von Dorn]

Let the States shake with fear and invest, invest money ... Someday there will not be enough money. More likely ....

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Alex von Dorn

There will never be enough money someday. More likely ....

their damned printing press broke!
So what?

[am808s]

(military officials have the right to fear (modernization of the Russian fleet) in the context of the current confrontation with Russia)
Who is pushing them into this confrontation? Live peacefully for yourself, trade and do not shake your nerves yourself and all your neighbors.