Military Review

"Admiral Essen" completed state tests

47
State tests of the second frigate of project 11356 Admiral Essen ended at the training grounds of the North fleet, Said MIC with reference to the press service of the Baltic plant "Yantar".




“The final stage of state tests in the landfills in the Northern Fleet under the combined program of factory running and state tests was the completion of tests of aircraft of the ship with the support of the Ka-31Р helicopter. This work was successfully completed on April 15 in the waters of the Barents Sea ",
the report said.

“Now the ship is preparing to return to the Baltic Sea,” the press service said.

Earlier, the deputy head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, which includes the Yantar, Igor Ponomarev said that the surrender of the ship of the Navy is scheduled for the end of April.

Help MIC: “Admiral Essen” was laid at the Baltic Yantar Shipbuilding Plant 8 July 2011 of the year, launched on November 7 2014 of the year. State tests of "Admiral Essen" began on January 30. Their first stage took place in the Baltic, after which the frigate went to the Northern Fleet. ”
Photos used:
http://sudostroenie.info
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr April 19 2016 19: 14
    +34
    The number of "Admirals" in the seas is increasing. Handsome! Happy service!
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 April 19 2016 19: 18
      +20
      7 feet and fair wind!
      And military fortune on all seas.
      1. Gerfalcon
        Gerfalcon April 19 2016 20: 45
        +14
        Oh, how is the Black Sea Fleet and the Mediterranean squadron waiting for him ...
  2. Alex777
    Alex777 April 19 2016 19: 15
    +11
    This can not but rejoice!
  3. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING April 19 2016 19: 17
    +9
    Good luck!
  4. UVB
    UVB April 19 2016 19: 19
    +22
    Admiral Essen "was laid down at the Baltic shipyard Yantar on July 8, 2011, launched on November 7, 2014.
    It is certainly wonderful that the fleet is replenished, but isn’t it too much for more than three years from laying to launching for a ship of such a displacement? Moreover, the series has been worked out for a long time!
    1. Revolver
      Revolver April 19 2016 20: 14
      +27
      Under Soviet rule, ships were built much more often, and much larger.
      My business, of course, is the side, but ... Here, like Kakland, the Russian Federation owes 3 lard greens, and does not give. And I assure you that I will not give it up, because it’s dumb pennies, from the word at all. So, it would be necessary to collect. There is no money, so take real estate, specifically the Nikolaev region, while the shipyards there did not fall apart at the end, and there were still those who worked there when they worked. Then, maybe, something larger than the frigate can be built. And more often than a thing in 3 years.
      1. Dym71
        Dym71 April 19 2016 20: 41
        +6
        Quote: Nagan
        My business, of course, is the side, but ...

        promising ellipsis winked
        Quote: Nagan
        Here, like Kakland, the Russian Federation owed 3 lard greens, and does not give. And I assure you that I will not give it up, because it’s dumb pennies, from the word at all.

        hotooo! fellow
        Quote: Nagan
        So, it would be necessary to collect. There is no money, so take real estate, specifically the Nikolaev region

        In gives a cowboy wild west! laughing He said how he had discharged both Colts from the belt - "to collect"! And if the inhabitants of the Nikolaev region do not want to be "collected", what shall we do? recourse
        In general, the comment does not look like yours. - Nagant, maybe you have "dry law"
        introduced a new one or what other trouble? laughing
        1. Revolver
          Revolver April 19 2016 21: 58
          +11
          Quote: Dym71
          And if the inhabitants of the Nikolaev region do not want to be "collected", what shall we do?

          So Nikolaev is closer to Crimea than to Galicia, and people are about the same as in Crimea, minus Tatars. Only collectors need to be sent not the same boorish that everyone has heard, but polite.lol
          1. Altona
            Altona April 19 2016 22: 39
            +2
            Quote: Nagan
            So Nikolaev is closer to Crimea than to Galicia, and people are about the same as in Crimea, minus Tatars. Only collectors need to be sent not the same boorish that everyone has heard, but polite.

            ----------------------
            Nagan, maybe it’s easier for us to squeeze California from the USA, it was also Russian. Immediately, Russia's GDP will rise and you kind of find yourself in your homeland. Didn't think about it? laughing
            1. Revolver
              Revolver April 19 2016 23: 44
              +1
              Quote: Altona
              To squeeze California from the USA ... and it’s like you’ll end up in your homeland
              Here you are not Kaklandia, the return tortures. And finally, I'm on the other coast, and I'm not going to move anywhere from here, especially to California - there are earthquakes and solid liberals around.lol
      2. sisa29
        sisa29 April 19 2016 23: 36
        0
        That seems to be your comment and cheerfully and they wrote nonsense.
      3. sisa29
        sisa29 April 19 2016 23: 44
        +2
        If Ukraine owes us, then do you think it is legal to take away the region from Ukraine? But the Strazburg court awarded Yukas shareholders as much as 50 lard. It turns out you can pick up from us say the Kaliningrad region? And here the Balts fussed over the occupation, counted several hundred and that the Pskov region will be taken away. Agree nonsense, to take away territories from states on account of debts. An account to arrest or property on its territory is understandable, but not as non-territory.
      4. Serg81
        Serg81 April 20 2016 10: 09
        +1
        Nikolaev region, while the shipyards there did not fall apart at the end, and still remained It’s easier and cheaper to build a new shipyard, somewhere near Novorossiysk than it is spent on resuscitation of Nikolaev, especially since there are a lot of maidans (((
      5. The comment was deleted.
    2. Victor_1
      Victor_1 April 19 2016 22: 03
      +3
      The third ship is not so long ago worked out. In terms of armament and capabilities, it differs significantly from the Indian ships of this series. And it will be further developed several years after the start of operation.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Igor V
      Igor V April 20 2016 11: 59
      -2
      Quote: UVB
      Admiral Essen "was laid down at the Baltic shipyard Yantar on July 8, 2011, launched on November 7, 2014.
      It is certainly wonderful that the fleet is replenished, but isn’t it too much for more than three years from laying to launching for a ship of such a displacement? Moreover, the series has been worked out for a long time!

      As soon as an article about new ships appears, comments about long-term construction go immediately. But excuse me, Russia turned its course only two years ago, before that it was scouring the will of the waves in an unknown direction. And government loans have appeared relatively recently, thanks to many unloved Rogozin. And in the conditions created by interest-bearing ships it is almost impossible to build ships. So it is necessary to rejoice every ship and the fact that the industry is preserved and working.
  5. Altona
    Altona April 19 2016 19: 20
    +1
    Destroyers and frigates are now the main force of the surface fleet. Such beauties are always needed.
  6. Demeter
    Demeter April 19 2016 19: 25
    +2
    A good, truly versatile ship, and most importantly, all of its systems are combat-ready, not like on the Admiral Gorshkov ... whose tests dragged on beyond measure ...
  7. mitrich
    mitrich April 19 2016 19: 47
    +3
    "Substantial" article, you will not say anything. And part of the comments, she matches: "This cannot but rejoice! Good luck! ..."
    Well, I will join, the worse I am: GIVE !!!
    1. Botanologist
      Botanologist April 19 2016 20: 04
      +2
      Of course, in a single rush fellow give more! drinks Uraaaaa !!!! three times hi
    2. Altona
      Altona April 19 2016 22: 41
      +1
      Quote: mitrich
      "Substantial" article, you will not say anything. And part of the comments, she matches: "This cannot but rejoice! Good luck! ..."
      Well, I will join, the worse I am: GIVE !!!

      -------------------
      Well, what to write? The destroyer and frigate are in any way better than the RTOs in range and seaworthiness. To hit the alphabet again? laughing
  8. Nubia2
    Nubia2 April 19 2016 19: 47
    +2
    A very interesting series of ships.
    More to build.
    Do not dwell on these? Do not lock in the shores.
    1. Marconi41
      Marconi41 April 20 2016 01: 08
      0
      Quote: Nubia2
      A very interesting series of ships.

      This series, unfortunately, rested in the Bose due to Ukrainian engines, which we no longer supply. With the replacement of tight, so that if they continue to build them, then only for India, perhaps.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 20 2016 08: 10
      +1
      A very interesting series of ships.
      More to build.

      God forbid fool
      Such ships needed to be built 20 years ago. Now it is necessary to rivet massively pr.22350 (M)
      1. benjerro
        benjerro April 20 2016 11: 11
        +1
        Or pr.22350 or other projects with a large number of tactical missile weapons.
        The Americans have hundreds of missiles on ships of the Arleigh Burke class, and ours has 16 ...
        Can anyone explain to me why so few?
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz April 20 2016 14: 10
          +1
          The Americans have hundreds of missiles on ships of the Arleigh Burke class, and ours has 16 ...
          Can anyone explain to me why so few?

          Firstly: the Americans, through the same launcher, launch cruise, anti-aircraft, and anti-submarine missiles. In our country, the UKSK 3s14 is not imprisoned for anti-aircraft missiles.
          Secondly: do not confuse ship classes. Arly Burke is, as it were, the 10th destroyer, while Gorshkov is the 4,5th destroyer. Different tasks
          bully
          1. Roman 11
            Roman 11 April 20 2016 20: 20
            0
            Quote: Wiruz
            Secondly: do not confuse ship classes. Arly Burke is, as it were, the 10th destroyer, while Gorshkov is the 4,5th destroyer. Different tasks

            It’s not clear somehow .... Tell me directly, if 1 on 1, then Arly surpasses all our frigates by 2 or more times?

            And if "Nakhimov"?
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 April 20 2016 21: 19
              0
              Quote: Novel 11
              Quote: Wiruz
              Secondly: do not confuse ship classes. Arly Burke is, as it were, the 10th destroyer, while Gorshkov is the 4,5th destroyer. Different tasks

              It’s not clear somehow .... Tell me directly, if 1 on 1, then Arly surpasses all our frigates by 2 or more times?

              And if "Nakhimov"?


              Well, why so thick? hi
  9. Nubia2
    Nubia2 April 19 2016 19: 48
    +5
    Very successful series.
    I would like more of them. And not only them.
    For the Pacific, more ships are needed. And the number is the same.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 20 2016 08: 11
      +1
      For the Pacific Fleet, I want to believe that frigates pr.22350 (M) will be built. This will be a smart replacement for BOD pr.1155 and EM pr.956
  10. yahont
    yahont April 19 2016 20: 06
    +4
    Good news. We are waiting with "Grigorovich" on the Black Sea.
  11. Sergey333
    Sergey333 April 19 2016 20: 50
    +1
    The miracle happened! And then Buyanov alone will not be enough.
  12. Verdun
    Verdun April 19 2016 20: 57
    +2
    Outwardly handsome. Let's hope that under the "make-up" and the filling is appropriate. Here's just the name ... I would at least call a missile cruiser "Essen".
    1. sisa29
      sisa29 April 19 2016 23: 55
      0
      After the death of Admiral Essen on May 7, 1915, the naval minister, Admiral Grigorovich, vowed to name his name the best of the new ships of the Russian fleet. In fact, the name Essen was assigned to the warship only after 96 years
  13. hartlend
    hartlend April 19 2016 21: 10
    +1
    Rather, they would have already taken part in the Navy.
  14. proud
    proud April 19 2016 21: 33
    +4
    Krasava ship! Good luck with your service!
  15. sargus
    sargus April 19 2016 22: 29
    +5
    Forgive the fool .. but the color of the SHIP !!! my beloved and merges with the SEA !!!
  16. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir April 19 2016 22: 36
    0
    "Now the ship is preparing to return to the Baltic Sea" Missed, "sick"! Do you need humanitarian aid? Have you tried to work, slave souls? Or are you all professional beggars?
    1. pellets
      pellets April 19 2016 23: 10
      +1
      Well, then it’s time for the commissioning team to build and check other ships. At this time, not one "Essen" from our plant is being tested fellow
  17. atamankko
    atamankko April 19 2016 23: 06
    0
    All for the benefit of Russia, good luck to you, handsome.
  18. tinibar
    tinibar April 19 2016 23: 58
    +1
    Quote: oleg-gr
    The number of "Admirals" in the seas is increasing. Handsome! Happy service!

    When I read your comment, you had plus 20. I wish the Fatherland plus twenty admirals at sea (good we have enough glorious admiral names), well, plus 200 to you!
  19. Gippo
    Gippo April 20 2016 00: 08
    0
    "Glory, glory to the heroes, Glory!
    However, enough tribute was paid to them.
    Now let's talk about rubbish. "
    V. Mayakovsky.
    I don’t understand the enthusiasm for launching a coastal action ship.
    According to the classification of our sworn friends "Littoral Combat Ship (abbreviated - LCS)".
    A purely defensive vessel for the interception of smugglers and close protection of the naval base.
    In the USA, they are riveted like donuts, in dozens. We are units.
    Ocean surface the fleet is the backlog of the USSR, they still serve. Where are the modern designs?
    But they are not. There are such LCS. A small ship does not go far and does not live long.
    Fools choking with enthusiastic snots of something squealing about a revival .... Well, it’s just ridiculous to God.
  20. Yuri11076
    Yuri11076 April 20 2016 00: 22
    0
    Handsome !!! 7 feet under the keel !!!
  21. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 20 2016 03: 38
    +1
    Pancake. It seems to me that it would be worth writing
    whether this ship can carry "Caliber".
    And in general, if the first line is written "there is / no" Caliber (a) "on the ship",
    then half of the readers will not read further.))
    In general, you need to understand that this is not the growth of the fleet, but only "population support",
    replacement of leaving for scrapping.
    1. pellets
      pellets April 21 2016 11: 27
      0
      The lead ship of the Admiral Grigorovich series
      Project
      Country
      Naval Ensign of Russia.svg Russia
      Manufacturers
      Shipyard Yantar (Kaliningrad)
      Operators
      Navy of the Russian Federation
      Years in service since 2016 (plan)
      It is planned 6, with a possible increase to 9 or 12 units [1] (13 billion rubles. Pcs. [2])
      Built 3
      Under construction 3 [3] [4] [5]
      Main characteristics
      3620 ton displacement (standard)
      4035 tons (full)
      124,8 m length (longest)
      15,2 width m
      Draft 4,2 m (overall - 7,5)
      Engines two-shaft gas-gas turbine installation (GSTU) type COGAG
      Power 2х30450 HP, GTA M7Н1 (8450 HP Marching GTU, 22000 HP afterburning GTU), 4 DG WCM-800 by 800 kW (in Indian frigates)
      30 nodes travel speed
      Cruising range 4850 miles (at 14 knots) [6]
      Autonomy of swimming 30 days
      180 crew (18 officers) plus 20 marines [7]
      weaponry
      Radar armament BIUS "Requirement-M" radar for general detection "Frigate-M2M", radar for general detection "Positive-M1.2" (head No. 01354-01356), radar station MR-212 / 201-1 "Vaigach-U"
      Electronic weapons The electronic warfare complex PK-10 Smely (4 PU KT-216), SU 5P-10 Puma, SU MP-123-02 Vympel, PUTS Purga-11356
      Tactical strike weapons UKKS "Caliber-NK"
      Artillery 1x1-100 mm AU A-190
      Anti-aircraft artillery 2 × 6-30mm AU AK-630M [8]
      Missile armament of 8 anti-ship missiles ZM55 "Onyx" or 3M54 (family "Caliber-NK"),
      UVP ZS90E.1 SAM "Shtil-1" (36 SAM) [8], 8x1 launcher SAM "Igla-1"
      8 anti-submarine weapons of 91RE1 anti-submarine missiles (Caliber-NK family),
      1X12 PU RBU-6000 RPK-8 (48 PLUR 90Р or RSL-60)
      Mine-torpedo armament 2 × 2-533mm DTA-53-956 (torpedoes SET-65, 53-65K)
      1 aviation group helicopter Ka-27PL or Ka-31
  22. demiurg
    demiurg April 20 2016 05: 39
    +1
    Who knows, at 11356 GAS Titan-2, or something newer?
  23. NordUral
    NordUral April 20 2016 09: 51
    0
    Pobol such boats! Only universal launch cassettes would be better not for 8, but 24 or more.
  24. demiurg
    demiurg April 20 2016 12: 56
    +3
    Quote: Gippo
    "Glory, glory to the heroes, Glory!
    However, enough tribute was paid to them.
    Now let's talk about rubbish. "
    V. Mayakovsky.
    I don’t understand the enthusiasm for launching a coastal action ship.
    According to the classification of our sworn friends "Littoral Combat Ship (abbreviated - LCS)".
    A purely defensive vessel for the interception of smugglers and close protection of the naval base.
    In the USA, they are riveted like donuts, in dozens. We are units.
    Ocean surface the fleet is the backlog of the USSR, they still serve. Where are the modern designs?
    But they are not. There are such LCS. A small ship does not go far and does not live long.
    Fools choking with enthusiastic snots of something squealing about a revival .... Well, it’s just ridiculous to God.

    And why is it the OVR ship? The albatrosses are guarding the bases, under cover of 1241, and soon the Guardians will be. But this task is more serious. 1135 and visited the Strait of Aden, and in Vietnam. The fact that the displacement is modest when equipped with weapons comparable to frigates of 5000-6000 tons is our tradition. Worthy were created as simplified 1134, without a helicopter. It really just doesn’t always make sense to drive the destroyer to where Essen can do everything. The principle of reasonable sufficiency has not yet been canceled.