Russia is developing an updated concept of foreign policy

67
On the instructions of Vladimir Putin, a new edition of the concept of Russian foreign policy is being developed, RIA News Post by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.



According to the minister, “the period of uncertainty in world affairs continues, it is impossible to answer all the questions at once in a single stroke and invent some kind of magic formula that will allow solving any problems is impossible, especially in the current mosaic, contradictory international situation.

“At the same time, of course, the general trend can be observed; we are trying to reflect all these trends in our fundamental doctrinal documents. This is both the strategy of Russia's national security and the concept of Russia's foreign policy, ”he said.

At present, “we are talking about a polycentric architecture of world politics,” which “should ideally rely on the interaction of the leading centers of power in the interests of jointly solving global problems,” Lavrov said.

“Such a vision is shared by many states, although, as in all previous stages stories, automatism in international affairs does not exist. And there are no guarantees that the positive vector will prevail, ”the minister said.

Prior to this, the concept of the Russian foreign policy was updated in 2013.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 10 2016 08: 13
    Is it interesting that they will reach the inside arm or a person whose name cannot be called will be the president of foreign affairs?
    1. +36
      April 10 2016 08: 16
      Quote: sa-ag
      a person whose name cannot be called so will be the president of foreign affairs?

      An interesting definition, but I’m more interested in the government, which should deal with internal affairs, here it will deal with or not.
      1. +13
        April 10 2016 08: 58
        Quote: vovanpain
        Quote: sa-ag
        a person whose name cannot be called so will be the president of foreign affairs?

        An interesting definition, but I’m more interested in the government, which should deal with internal affairs, here it will deal with or not.


        I agree, spring has come and the roads that we made in 2014 melted with snow, the city’s enterprises reduced over 10 thousand people in half a year. One plus of taxi drivers became many and the fare fell.
        1. +2
          April 10 2016 20: 10
          Quote: INVESTOR
          I agree, spring has come and the roads that we made in 2014 melted with snow, the city’s enterprises reduced over 10 thousand people in half a year. One plus of taxi drivers became many and the fare fell.

          I agree with you, colleague. But even such taxi rides will not change the general civic fate that has suddenly been "piled on" over the past two years. hi
    2. +14
      April 10 2016 08: 35
      Quote: sa-ag
      Is it interesting that they will reach the inside arm or a person whose name cannot be called will be the president of foreign affairs?

      Guys, in my opinion, "the president of foreign affairs" - this is already at the level of the people.
      1. PKK
        0
        April 10 2016 10: 02
        Even Stalin himself could not overcome the Trotskyists, moreover, they multiply like mushrooms after the rain.
      2. PKK
        0
        April 10 2016 10: 02
        Even Stalin himself could not overcome the Trotskyists, moreover, they multiply like mushrooms after the rain.
    3. +12
      April 10 2016 08: 41
      The main concept, Russia, first of all.
      1. +14
        April 10 2016 09: 05
        Here it is the main concept of Russia: DO NOT BELIEVE, DO NOT BE AFRAID, DO NOT ASK ..!
        If at least one of them is violated, serious problems begin .. Then, with blood and loss, I have to prove the opposite! I simply and briefly tried to express myself ... hi
        1. +8
          April 10 2016 10: 08
          Quote: MATTER
          Here it is the main concept of Russia: DO NOT BELIEVE, DO NOT BE AFRAID, DO NOT ASK ..!

          Stopped because I do not agree ... No. These are thieves '(prisoners') commandments, known from Shalamov's "Kolyma Tales" ...

          The concept of inhumanity is not inherent in Russia. We are endless BELIEVE into a "good gentleman", the wisdom of those in power, into the promises of villains sprinkled with tears ... what
          DO NOT BE AFRAID on different forums to throw mud at each other, smash each other's face for a glass, but immediately we stand in a pose and "rough" our tongue in front of those who openly spit in our face, possessing a public office or parliamentary immunity, we keep this tongue behind our teeth , when it is necessary to tell the villain that he is a NUDO, a thief, embezzler or a liar. what
          DO NOT ASK, even when it comes to the deprivation of a driver’s license for traffic regulations wink , do not ask (we hope that they will see and appreciate it) neither an increase in salary, nor promotion wink OR DO NOT ASK that the social policy in the country of this same state change in relation to its own citizens? winked
          Yes, this is our state (an independent organization with sovereignty, special management and enforcement mechanisms that establish the legal order in a certain territory)
          DOES NOT BELIEVEthat can change something without violating the "accepted commandments" and without infringing on their own interests.
          NOT AFRAID neither indignation, nor anger of its citizens, nor accusations of lies because it is reliably protected by security, law enforcement agencies, and more recently, the national guard, which can (???) use weapons without warning (against people who do not have them) belay
          DO NOT ASKforgiveness of his people (why is it interesting ???) ... Yes, for the fact that, at least, we still don’t know what bright future blind and half-blind (and maybe cunning) leaders are leading us, who cannot plan the development of their own country for a five-year period, but they know for sure that everyone will survive to retirement and be ready for work and defense, eating fast foods and foods with GMOs ... wassat

          JUST! in which the share of truth ... Yes hi
      2. 0
        April 10 2016 23: 13
        it would also be good if, in the new concept of foreign policy, they still learn to write correctly:
        black * ёpy through "O", and not ** separately bully
    4. +5
      April 10 2016 10: 31
      Strange as that. There is no ideology, but then what is the concept growing on? request
    5. +4
      April 10 2016 11: 30
      Is it interesting that they will reach the inside arm or a person whose name cannot be called will be the president of foreign affairs?


      Well, God forbid, it’s Putin who will say it’s immediately raking in the cons. And a man whose name cannot be called normally.
      1. +2
        April 10 2016 12: 15
        Quote: aleks700
        Well, God forbid, it’s Putin who will say it’s immediately raking in the cons. And a man whose name cannot be called normally.

        The mind cannot understand Russia, the common arshin cannot be measured. So, everything is within normal limits.
      2. -1
        April 10 2016 18: 01
        Quote: aleks700
        who will say immediately rowed cons
        "Dictatorial regime" deprives freedom of speech? Minuses can be controlled only by those who have nothing to say, but you want pluses and virtual titles.
        1. +1
          April 10 2016 20: 31
          "Dictatorial regime" deprives freedom of speech? Minuses can be controlled only by those who have nothing to say, but you want pluses and virtual titles.

          Well, it's not a plus. But how can some and the same people respond positively to the surname Putin, but negatively to the unnamed?
  2. +9
    April 10 2016 08: 14
    everything is beautiful and dignified in our foreign policy, I would like to pay more attention to domestic policy, while a number of worthy politicians protect and promote the country in the international arena, within the country the economic bloc of liberal worms is pulling the rope in the wrong direction
    1. +12
      April 10 2016 08: 35
      "An updated foreign policy concept is being developed in Russia"
      darksoul - Totally agree with you.
      Foreign policy is on the top five! You know a lot of people unanimously say. That we absolutely agree with our president. Many even believe that Putin generally needs to deal only with the army and foreign policy and not get inside the state, because he does not have it at all . And that is to say the least. And the prime minister should be engaged in the country. The only question is what kind of prime minister. Now I will express an seditious thought.
      We need Putin and Lukashenko. Why is Lukashenko yes because he is a business executive! And in foreign policy he is not good. But there is order inside the country. It is not for nothing that our eagle has two heads on the coat of arms.
      Clearly separate their responsibilities. And what is happening now. Yes, you yourself saw at the last press conference in St. Petersburg.
      1. +7
        April 10 2016 09: 54
        Quote: Observer2014
        In general, Putin only needs to deal with the army and foreign policy and not get inside the state, because he does not have it at all.

        primitive.
        Maybe elect two presidents - external and internal? With equal but multi-vector powers?
        1. 0
          April 10 2016 10: 25
          By the way, a good idea, an absolute monarchy is not the best form of government.
      2. +2
        April 10 2016 19: 28
        Quote: Observer2014
        We need Putin and Lukashenko.

        The bear won’t tolerate an outsider (let’s put it mildly) in its den. Yes, it’s easier to farm in a small garden than on an immense plantation. And, of course, I would like to know the answer to the question: * Why is a bandelier inside the country with such a strong president *. Why do liberals rule ? hi
        1. 0
          April 10 2016 20: 34
          Why, with such a strong president, a bardelier in the country *. Why do liberals rule
          Because the unnamed guarantor of liberalism in Russia?
    2. -1
      April 10 2016 11: 48
      Try to work.
  3. +5
    April 10 2016 08: 14
    The army and navy are the best tool for foreign policy. Do not be shy about your complexes smile
    1. +6
      April 10 2016 09: 25
      Quote: vglazunov
      The army and navy are the best tool for foreign policy. Do not be shy about your complexes


      Yeah ... For domestic politics, an instrument also appeared - the National Guard ...
  4. +3
    April 10 2016 08: 18
    Is everything right, all the way, in step with the times, after Syria, God himself ordered, after the failure of the United States below what is considered a city sewer, about Fedot and the goat heard? Where Fedot the goat (does some actions) are two deft turns and the goat (in short, vice versa.)
  5. +6
    April 10 2016 08: 22
    Honest rules exist for those who are satisfied with everything, including in politics. If in international politics we see only the illusion of some rules, this means that nothing suits anyone. So the main goal of such countries is to achieve their goals. And for their goals, they are ready for anything. It means that for Russia there should be no rules in relation to these countries. It's just like a clear day. And with our friends we will continue partnership honest relations.
  6. +11
    April 10 2016 08: 23
    we would have a prime minister, a guy like S. Lavrov ... powerful, brutal. That the ministers trembled, afraid to hear the famous: "de *** s b ****"!
    1. +1
      April 10 2016 11: 09
      A guy like S. Lavrov ... powerful, brutal



      Not worth it .... There are "execution" places (well, at least health care, or education). First, Shoigu and Lavrov went there in order to avoid illusions. Then, yes, you can be a chairman or a president. wink

      Do you know why the power engineer of the workshop is a bastard (although it is always needed, such an infection), and the head of the ACS department is a darling? laughing
  7. +3
    April 10 2016 08: 26
    Everything is fine with foreign policy, but full of rotten one! There is no concept of economic development, and only some miserable babble of liberal economists is heard about the rise from the bottom of the bottom!
    1. -5
      April 10 2016 11: 54
      Try to work, and the economy will begin to develop.
      1. 0
        April 10 2016 14: 37
        Exactly. Do not put the pros and cons on VO, but work. I managed.
        Stop whining already about the government, the central bank and so on. All solve their problems, it’s hard for everyone. Someone solves the problem of enrichment - they are bad people, but they always are and always will be. And someone - to feed the family, and now it is not impossible.
  8. +2
    April 10 2016 08: 26
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    we would have a prime minister, a guy like S. Lavrov ... powerful, brutal. That the ministers trembled, afraid to hear the famous: "de *** s b ****"!

    And I want a woman !!!
    1. +1
      April 10 2016 09: 22
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      we would have a prime minister, a guy like S. Lavrov ... powerful, brutal. That the ministers trembled, afraid to hear the famous: "de *** s b ****"!

      And I want a woman !!!

      I want it too, young ... Spring hell! wassat
  9. +3
    April 10 2016 08: 28
    And there is no guarantee that a positive vector will prevail

    No guarantees yet. States (and their closest assistants), of course, will be opposed and efforts to ensure that our concept prevails will require a lot of effort. But a lot has already been done, and the seemingly indestructible states are now in a very unstable position.
    1. 0
      April 12 2016 13: 37
      The SGA has been in an “unstable position for the entire XX century and the beginning of the current one, but they want anyone.
      And, in general, "The States Are to Blame" is a brand already.
      Watch TV and be touched. Where is Soviet propaganda ...
  10. +2
    April 10 2016 08: 30
    “Ideally, it should be based on the interaction of leading centers of power in the interests of jointly solving global problems”

    Ideally, of course, it looks good. But how can Russia solve global problems with such a "center" of power as the United States? When they don't just want to listen to you and hear you, and they do their best to impose their opinion.
  11. +4
    April 10 2016 08: 31
    According to the minister, “the period of uncertainty in world affairs continues, it is impossible to answer all the questions at once in a single stroke and invent some kind of magic formula that will allow solving any problems is impossible, especially in the current mosaic, contradictory international situation.

    With all due respect to you, dear Mr. Lavrov, you are wrong.
    There is one magical, universal, timeless formula that allows, based on it, to conduct the foreign policy of Russia.
    This formula is "Everything for the good of Russia."
    Nothing more is required.
    Every step, every action, every breath is only for the good of the country and its people.
    Try it.
    I hope it works out.

    And further.
    Defending our national interests, both small and large.
    So that all other countries of the "great democracy" understand what is in Russia, even after the change of the President, ministers, etc. nothing will change in the future.
    That is all.

    Friends, partners, fellow travelers, they were and will be.
    But priority is the good of the motherland.
  12. +2
    April 10 2016 08: 31
    Protection of Russia's interests in foreign policy is necessary, you cannot follow the lead of the West, as in the times of "Mr. YES" Kozyrev A.V., otherwise they will be "eaten".
  13. +2
    April 10 2016 08: 37
    Russia was brought to its knees in Yeltsin’s times, now Russia is getting up and I hope it’s not in a good pose. Traitors and partners, unfortunately, remained, only the people paid for everything with blood, and politicians earn dividends and offshore.
    1. -2
      April 10 2016 13: 44
      Well, I just can't resist laughing

      Quote: vglazunov
      people pay with blood for everything, and politicians earn dividends and offshore

      - "the people pay for everything in blood" .. Vasily, where did you learn to troll so thickly?
      - politicians earn dividends and offshore - Vasily .. earn dividends - I understand that .. but how earn offshore??

      And anyway, are you aware - what is it - offshore? Where do they live? Why are you needed?

      Eh, Vasily .. they’ve taken the troll, so at least don’t mess like that request
      1. 0
        April 10 2016 19: 28
        And what is offshore, ay-yay-yay-yay! Who? And who did it?
        Roman, the trolls are the first to shout, hold the troll ... By the number of messages you are probably the God of trolls laughing
        1. +1
          April 10 2016 19: 32
          Quote: vglazunov
          By the number of messages, Roman is probably the God of trolls

          - but in quality? wink

          Speaking of birds:

          A direct analogy from ordinary life to the phenomenon trolling pick up is not easy. The closest concepts are andtemptation, provocation and incitement - that is, deliberate deception, slander, arousal of quarrels and discord, a call for unseemly actions

          - find in my comments at least something similar .. if not laziness. Fick find tongue

          Quote: vglazunov
          politicians earn dividends and offshore

          - explain all the same how "earn offshore".. otherwise my brain will break ..
          1. 0
            April 10 2016 19: 43
            Here is a book-eater, constantly taking out of context, either words or part sentences.
            Politicians earn political dividends and offshore (unfinished thought, in offshore hide their capital from the people. But Volodya well done all of them asked to return the capital to Russia, amnesty of capital).
            1. +2
              April 10 2016 19: 46
              Quote: vglazunov
              unfinished thought, in offshore hide their capital from the people

              - oh, glimpses ...

              Quote: vglazunov
              Volodya well done, he asked all of them to return capital to Russia, an amnesty of capital

              - And who is Volodya to you, I am embarrassed to ask?
              - this amnesty failed miserably .. although, in the light of recent events in Panama - maybe that will come out worthwhile ..
              1. 0
                April 10 2016 19: 50
                Volodya is a partner of Huseynovich, in general, a wonderful person for them, but I would like for us too smile
            2. +1
              April 10 2016 20: 06
              Quote: vglazunov
              Volodya well done he asked all of them to return the capital to Russia

              It was necessary not to ask, but to force the return of capital to Russia! And so to force that there were no twofold interpretations. And yet, to create conditions under which the withdrawal of capital abroad would have absolutely unacceptable provisions for the withdrawal.
              1. -1
                April 10 2016 20: 12
                Quote: Saratoga833
                It was necessary not to ask, but to force the return of capital to Russia!

                - as? Any thoughts? Share, feel free to ..

                Quote: Saratoga833
                And so make sure that there are no twofold interpretations

                - what are "doubles"?

                Quote: Saratoga833
                And yet, to create conditions under which the withdrawal of capital abroad would have absolutely unacceptable provisions for the withdrawal

                - in what language did you write it ... you are our tongue-tied one ... they don’t speak Russian like that, I suggest ..
                1. -2
                  April 10 2016 20: 17
                  Roman, is he Russian? Why do you have the flag of the USA or Iceland. Are you writing not from Russia or are you hiding your real IP?
                  1. 0
                    April 10 2016 20: 32
                    Quote: vglazunov
                    Why do you have

                    - you’ve been taken here .. okay?

                    Quote: vglazunov
                    Why the flag of the USA or Iceland

                    - I'm Batman laughing

                    - a year + on the site, but you don’t know such simple things .. for half a year, something was "improved" on the site, after that this whistle with flags started

                    - the site registers a certain IP in the user profile, based on this IP draws a flag

                    - where does he get these IPs from is a mystery to me .. but for a programmer I would tear off such hands ..

                    Voooooot ...
                    1. -2
                      April 10 2016 20: 50
                      Roman, you must be cosmopolitan. It’s good that we have an international. I had such a bug, I remained a patriot, took the oath to protect my homeland from adversaries laughing
  14. +4
    April 10 2016 09: 03
    The Lord is not much off topic, but you can lose Belarus.
    Read the forum on the topic: "An updated foreign policy concept is being developed in Russia." The generation of the 90s is growing.
    http://talks.by/showthread.php?t=14276826
    1. -5
      April 10 2016 09: 07
      Quote: james
      The Lord is not much off topic, but you can lose Belarus.

      Gentlemen may lose .... But not Russia!
      1. +2
        April 10 2016 09: 17
        How can you lose yourself? I don't know how anyone, but I personally listen to Pesnyarov every day, the best pieces of which were written by Mulyavin, who was born in Sverdlovsk.
      2. -4
        April 10 2016 10: 07
        Quote: james
        Lord is not much off topic

        Quote: MATTER
        Gentlemen may lose .... But not Russia!

        1. +4
          April 10 2016 11: 49
          Kick you to the Professor in "Heart of a Dog" Very far away .. You remind me of this Shvonder on the site ..!)))) No offense, the same snide and disgusting ... If you get to the authorities you will shoot right and left)) I know such "crap!" ...
          1. -2
            April 10 2016 12: 25
            Quote: MATTER
            You remind me of this Shvonder ... you’ll shoot right and left

            well, you're going to shoot, MIKHAN, when you get to Moscow. At least he promised to "tear his teeth". So, all this Shvonderism with its famous "You hater of the proletariat!" - it's yours, friend. And a passion for slogans and wacky metaphors ...
            "And we'll just call the girls -..."
            1. -3
              April 10 2016 13: 28
              Hold back the kicks ... (hello to nwal, kasyanov and sobchak ....))))
              1. -2
                April 10 2016 14: 09
                Quote: MATTER
                Hold back

                What, like the index finger of Ramzanchik?
                On, admire:
    2. +1
      April 10 2016 12: 00
      Your link proves that there are two or three (or provocateurs) in Belarus. Not everyone was caught by the "last dictator of Europe". Or because of the hillock (from khakhlostan?) Write?
  15. +3
    April 10 2016 09: 29
    "To this end, Russia will build up cooperation in such formats as the G2013, BRICS, GXNUMX, SCO ..., UN, RIC, CIS, CSTO, SCO ..." - from the XNUMX "concept" ...
    Does "interaction" with this "primer" give Russia anything at all? Or they just need our markets, resources, loans, membership fees, tough guys to solve problems, "EMERCOM cargo", sappers, etc. ...
    It is not noticeable that anyone really, except for words and smiles, helped Russia ........
    Translated into the moderator's language: "why do we need them"?
  16. +3
    April 10 2016 09: 45
    Foreign policy is a daughter
    inner - stepdaughter.
  17. +1
    April 10 2016 09: 52
    You can't teach an old dog new tricks. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been turned into a private business shop with hereditary "labor dynasties". Now they hope to make them work in the interests of the state, rather naively.
  18. -1
    April 10 2016 09: 53
    Everyone is shouting with one voice that everything is fine with foreign policy, but internal - no, or it is not like that, and does not suit. Some - because there is too much freedom, others - because there is too little. And 5 percent - are generally ready to go to the square and crush everything (there is such a percentage of marginal people in any society, like yeast, just give free rein)! And no one remembers that in the year XNUMX, NOT a DOLLAR from oil revenues went to the treasury? And in Chechnya they suddenly decided that Russia is so weak that you can go to set fire to Degestan? And in power and around there was a crowd of Chubais, Kasyanovs and Nemtsovs, who, in addition to filling their pockets, proclaimed as their goal "not a return to a planned economy"! And then there were no others. Kudrin quarreled with Medvedev - PERSONALLY, and the iPhone is so narrow-minded, even though he is a professor and a doctor of sciences ... And where are Berezovsky, Gusinsky and many others? And you say there is no domestic policy. It's just that such a crowd of people needs to be scattered - and they have their own connections, patrons, interests. Now the National Guard is being introduced. What for? And then, that this is a way to "shake up" the entire leadership of the Internal Troops and a number of services that are now part of the new structure, to destroy the corruption "chains" that cannot be broken in any other way (by changing the "top leaders").
    1. +2
      April 10 2016 18: 18
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Now the National Guard is being introduced. What for? And then, that this is a way to "shake up" the entire leadership of the BB and a number of services that are now part of the new structure, to destroy the corruption "chains" that cannot be broken in any other way (by changing the "top leaders").
      Hopefully. Earlier I wondered how it is possible to dismantle the system from above in modern conditions. It is good if this is the purpose of the new structure. But, there is one "but": until you see the elevator that carries up honest and professional.
  19. 0
    April 10 2016 09: 57
    Now “We are talking about polycentric architecture world politics ”, which“ ideally should be based on the interaction of leading centers of power for joint solutions to global problems»
    «This vision is shared by many states.although, as at all previous stages of history, automatism in international affairs does not exist. ”


    We can definitely say that this is ideally true. And where is the UN with its Charter, where about the same is stated?

    "to live together, in peace with each other, as good neighbors, and to unite our forces to maintain international peace and security, and to ensure that principles and methods are adopted so that the armed forces are used only in the common interest, and use the international apparatus for promoting the economic and social progress of all peoples, decided to join our efforts to achieve these goals. "

    The UN exists at the expense of member states, but I don’t remember being rescued from it for not fulfilling the Charter. It doesn’t work - self-dissolve, or don’t powder your brains.
  20. +3
    April 10 2016 10: 20
    Interestingly, in this updated concept there will be something about the "Russian world"?
    Or has the topic already been hushed up?
  21. +5
    April 10 2016 10: 27
    And inside of the country we are doing well, do not need to change anything? Our rulers played too ...
    1. +1
      April 10 2016 13: 59
      They do what they do best. It `s naturally.
      I have long proposed to unite with Belarus and appoint Lukashenko as prime minister.
      But he replaces all our oligarchs !!!
      So, the idea is stillborn. ((
      1. 0
        April 10 2016 16: 18
        But he replaces all our oligarchs !!!


        It is naive. Has he already transplanted his own? In Belarus, socialism and there is no private property? smile
        It was the oligarchs of Belarus and nafig that the union did not surrender - to fall under the Moscow oligarchs and lose the market and power, the people would be “for.” (And the Moscow oligarchs would also be “for”)

        No, the specific princes flee easily, but they were always collected with a club and a gallows.
  22. +4
    April 10 2016 10: 37
    "Politics is an economy raised to the rank of interstate relations." No matter what they say, until serious economic changes take place, there is no reason to expect a political strengthening of Russia.
    1. 0
      April 10 2016 13: 57
      This is not an exact definition.
      We must add to the economy the military power and art of diplomats.
      You can buy everything, but it can be taken away from the weak and rich by the poor but strong. Well, Carleone said everything about the word and the gun.))
      In short, something like that.))
      1. -1
        April 10 2016 20: 46
        There is no military power without a strong economy. Incidentally, "Cosa Nostra" rose precisely at the expense of profits from the sale of alcohol during the Prohibition era. and it doesn't matter that the business was illegal. And diplomacy without gold in your pocket and bayonets behind your back is worthless. Weapons have to either be produced or bought.
  23. 0
    April 10 2016 13: 51
    Quote: INVESTOR
    Quote: vovanpain
    Quote: sa-ag
    a person whose name cannot be called so will be the president of foreign affairs?

    An interesting definition, but I’m more interested in the government, which should deal with internal affairs, here it will deal with or not.


    I agree, spring has come and the roads that we made in 2014 melted with snow, the city’s enterprises reduced over 10 thousand people in half a year. One plus of taxi drivers became many and the fare fell.

    As for the roads, finally, a positive shift has appeared: those who repair the roads will be responsible for their condition for 3 years. Ie repair at your own expense.
    I am glad to announce that he himself had a hand in this. And although I demanded to make the liability period of 7 years, but 3 years to start is not bad.)
    And factories are being built.
  24. 0
    April 10 2016 14: 17
    Quote: siberalt
    Strange as that. There is no ideology, but then what is the concept growing on? request

    At petrodollars and cutting social programs, cutting public sector salaries, etc.
  25. 0
    April 10 2016 14: 46
    Quote: Portolan
    The main concept, Russia, first of all.

    And, Russia, as a territory with resources to enrich the "family" or, Russia, as the people living in it, making it ??
  26. 0
    April 10 2016 19: 49
    it’s impossible to invent any magic formula that will solve any problems


    An excellent excuse justifying stupidity, toothlessness and outright laziness in the foreign policy of today's Russia. A lazy minister who considers himself irreplaceable, who has been sitting in his place for so long and still does not know how and what needs to be done, WILL COME INTO A NEW CONCEPT. It's just funny ... if it weren’t so sad.
  27. The comment was deleted.