Is Putin guilty? .. The South Carolina state authorities filed a lawsuit against the US federal government for non-compliance with the agreement with the Russian Federation on the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium

59
In the edition Aiken Standard it is reported that the authorities of the US state of South Carolina have sued the US federal government. The lawsuit says that official Washington does not comply with agreements previously reached with Moscow on the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium.

Is Putin guilty? .. The South Carolina state authorities filed a lawsuit against the US federal government for non-compliance with the agreement with the Russian Federation on the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium


The South Carolina state attorney said that a lawsuit has already been filed with the court, the main requirement of which is to fulfill the obligations of the United States authorities to dispose of weapons-grade plutonium, the volumes of which (disposal) were discussed with Russia.

At the same time, bewilderment is expressed regarding the fact that Russia is in fact complying with such an agreement with the United States unilaterally.

Earlier, the US State Department stated that Washington "does not violate agreements with the Russian Federation." The translation of the statement of the official representative of the US foreign policy department is quoted by the newspaper Kommersant:

The agreement, which the US and Russia signed in 2000, gives the parties the opportunity to consult and agree on disposal methods and does not contain binding deadlines. The US has not violated this agreement, and assumptions to the contrary are not true. We are fully committed to fulfilling our obligations under the agreement.


Generally speaking, today it is extremely difficult to find an agreement that the United States has not yet violated. Considering the fact that any international agreement for the United States stands after national legislation, the practice of violating international obligations for Washington has long become the norm.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    April 8 2016 15: 02
    Oh, someone's eyes are already starting to open
    1. +35
      April 8 2016 15: 03
      Rather a sluggish attempt to play a democratic state (((
      1. +9
        April 8 2016 15: 52
        the practice of violating international obligations has long become the norm for Washington.


        This is the USA and they think that it is not necessary for them, but someone did a very good job with the state authorities.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        April 8 2016 22: 33
        Quote: Byshido_dis
        Rather a sluggish attempt to play a democratic state (((



        These are just grandmothers and nothing more.
    2. +34
      April 8 2016 15: 08
      That's all she laughing
    3. +9
      April 8 2016 15: 11
      Well, the country of mattress is an example of democracy, they have not written any laws. Well, Putin is always to blame for them, he was the one standing with a pistol at Obama's temple and sentenced: -Do not destroy plutonium.
      1. WKS
        +1
        April 8 2016 17: 09
        Quote: 79807420129
        Well the country is mattress ...
        There are also stars in the corner.
      2. 0
        April 11 2016 09: 44
        [quote = 79807420129] Well, the country of mattress is an example of democracy, they don't have any laws written. Well, Putin is always to blame for them, it's him who stood with a pistol at Obama's temple and said: -Do not destroy plutonium. [Quote = XNUMX]
        The Americans are great. Your laws, your interests are above all. Our utyrkas need to learn from them.
        1. 0
          April 11 2016 13: 03
          Quote: spiriolla-xnumx
          The Americans are great. Your laws, your interests are above all. Our utyrkas need to learn from them.


          And what does it have to do with it!
          It has a definite concept - KIDALS!
          Do you know what a contract, agreement or agreement is and have you ever heard of what it meant to Russian merchants to disrupt the terms of an agreement or agreement ???
          For them, it was a loss of image and it was possible to put an end to their activities. Nobody else worked with such grief as a huckster, all their gesheft needs to be thought out before they "shake hands".
          Yes, and I doubt that you will go to the store again or somewhere else, where you were thrown at the grannies.
    4. +1
      April 8 2016 15: 20
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Oh, someone's eyes are already starting to open

      Will never open up! Just be independent.
    5. +6
      April 8 2016 15: 34
      Yes, not eyes there, the plant is 68% ready, the money has been invested, and there is nothing to dispose of, just a business!
    6. +3
      April 8 2016 20: 47
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Oh, someone's eyes are already starting to open

      Everything is apparently simpler. Most likely, a disposal tender was won by a relevant American company in the United States under a plutonium disposal agreement. Capacities were built, workers were recruited ... And federal money did not reach the contractor, like plutonium lol
      Here are the guys and rebel - no work, no money! angry
    7. +2
      April 10 2016 09: 35
      Well, why so ... I have not read this agreement myself, but if the time frame for its implementation is really not spelled out there (a question for the developers from our side) - how can you demand its implementation at the moment. Then this is an agreement of intent, and nothing more. And it's ridiculous to put forward pritenzii. DO NOT confuse with the Agreement - which usually contains the terms.
      1. 0
        April 10 2016 20: 22
        The excuse in the form of "unspecified deadlines" only works if the recycling process is already underway.
    8. +6
      April 10 2016 11: 02
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Oh, someone's eyes are already starting to open

      I'm sitting, looking out the window
      mate rushing from the yard -
      the neighbor’s cat died ...
      Putin is to blame.
      I have a wife Khokhlushka,
      and the brother-in-law is not married ...
      “Let's drink with grief. Where is the mug? ”, -
      Putin is to blame.

      "A storm is covering the sky with darkness."
      I listened, froze.
      Chew! It looks like a "putinoid"
      sneaks to our rear
      what would catch up more horror,
      rake then, go.
      I'm not scared, hear Putin!
      Where are you?
      Where are you?
      Come out!

      Everything around is sheer bullshit
      everything is pro-Putin kneading.
      Not ISIS, but Putin in Raqqa,
      he is in Brussels, he is in the EU!
      He is on the road and at a crossroads
      in Washington and in the Crimea.
      This is him, Gerasim Putin
      drowned in the pond Mu-mu.
      And surrenders to me guys
      (throughout this situation),
      that Yeshua once
      Putin slammed, not Pilate.
      The chamber is already buzzing ...
      here there has been a split.
      Doctor, doctor, where is NATO ?!
      Let us get an injection!
  2. +20
    April 8 2016 15: 02
    Is Putin guilty? .. The South Carolina state authorities filed a lawsuit against the US federal government for non-compliance with the agreement with the Russian Federation on the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium


    Another look.
    1.Interplannaya struggle in the USA (military-industrial complex and all that)
    2. The game of democracy. For some Navalny to write a post: "And the authorities of Chelyabinsk are weak to file a lawsuit ... against Moscow."

    Sorry for the stupidity, but stopped wearing rose-colored glasses since 2011 ....
    1. +2
      April 8 2016 15: 09
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      Is Putin guilty? .. The South Carolina state authorities filed a lawsuit against the US federal government for non-compliance with the agreement with the Russian Federation on the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium


      Another look.
      1.Interplannaya struggle in the USA (military-industrial complex and all that)
      2. The game of democracy. For some Navalny to write a post: "And the authorities of Chelyabinsk are weak to file a claim ...."

      Sorry for the stupidity, but stopped wearing rose-colored glasses since 2011 ....

      Glasses? Yes, these unhealthy creatures are trying to destroy us with a smile of 32 teeth.
    2. +4
      April 8 2016 15: 59
      Do not confuse the statuses of states in the United States and regions in Russia. These are two big differences. They only shout in international relations: "We are the USA - the state." And inside, a rabble of regions with their own laws. Even the criminal law of each state is different. Those. there is a right, there is a national one. And the local somewhere allows you to ask the federal authorities - And how do you perform this and that.
    3. 0
      April 8 2016 16: 50
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      2. The game of democracy. For some Navalny to write a post: "And the authorities of Chelyabinsk are weak

      Easily.
      However, Lesha, no matter how he writes, turns out to be crap. The last time I wrote about the Icelandic prime minister was like a mess ..
  3. +4
    April 8 2016 15: 19
    Let them bury on the lawn near the White House))))))))) wassat
  4. +12
    April 8 2016 15: 20
    Iron excuse ...
  5. +4
    April 8 2016 15: 22
    The bloody FSB has recruited Putin's entire population of South Carolina! Human rights defenders of the entire planet Earth stand up to defend American values, heart is bent!
  6. +8
    April 8 2016 15: 22
    Long live the People's Republic of South Carolina! Hurray, comrades))
    1. +2
      April 8 2016 15: 27
      Alaska and California!
  7. +5
    April 8 2016 15: 27
    "Generally speaking, today it is extremely difficult to find an agreement that the United States has not yet managed to violate..
    Considering the fact that any international agreement for the United States stands after national legislation, the practice of violating international obligations for Washington has long become the norm. "...

    The first thing to say is that when you sit down at the table to play with a sharpie, you need to have a pair of aces up your sleeve and - at least - be able to use them ...

    And as for the second ... THEY - for themselves - are doing the right thing ... WE should have done this a long time ago, but some "servants of the people" have green candy wrappers and lack of common sense in their eyes ...
    1. +1
      April 8 2016 16: 09
      Quote: weksha50
      The first thing to say is that when sitting at the table to play with a sharpie, you need to have a pair of aces up your sleeve and

      Revolver in hand! laughing
  8. +3
    April 8 2016 15: 27
    Is Putin to blame?


    No bl ... Santa Claus is to blame. Of course Putin, who else laughing
  9. +8
    April 8 2016 15: 39
    You better figure this out. The prosecutor of the not-so-great state of SC sued the federal government, i.e. almost personally to Obama. And the topic is quite serious, not like the content of the poster in elementary school classes. Moreover, it has every chance of winning the case.
    And can the prosecutor of some thread of the hypothetical Komi republic sue Putin?what
    1. +7
      April 8 2016 16: 23
      No, he can not. Because...
      "By virtue of Article 91 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation has immunity, which means that it is impossible to bring the President of Russia to any liability established by federal legislation, including criminal"
    2. 0
      April 8 2016 16: 56
      Quote: Nagan
      And can a prosecutor of a thread of a hypothetical Komi republic make a lawsuit against Putin?



      I don’t know about the prosecutor, but an ordinary citizen of Russia is quite.

      A resident of the city of Balakovo, Nikolai Suvorov, filed a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region with a request to remove Vladimir Putin from office. The court accepted the application for consideration.

      So the question is "past the cash register".

      PS))) If the prosecutor did not file a lawsuit against the president, then this does not mean that he does not have such a right hi
      1. 0
        April 9 2016 01: 02
        Quote: Galich Kos

        A resident of the city of Balakovo, Nikolai Suvorov, filed a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region with a request to remove Vladimir Putin from office. The court accepted the application for consideration.

        And he refused.
        The Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region terminated proceedings on the claim of Nikolai Suvorov, a resident of Balakovo, who asked to dismiss Vladimir Putin from the post of President of the Russian Federation "as an enemy of the people, a friend of oligarchs and officials, for the plundering of Russia and the impoverishment of the Russian people, for the enrichment of officials, bankers, billionaire robbers" ... As stated in the definition of arbitration, courts have no right to interfere with the activities of the Russian president.
        Interfax
        yesterday 15: 17
        1. 0
          April 10 2016 12: 32
          here a little distorted, incompletely placed:

          The Arbitration Court of the Saratov Region, composed of: ....
          Having considered the materials of case No. A57-5476 / 2016 upon application
          Suvorov Nikolai Fedorovich, Balakovo, Saratov region
          interested party:
          President of the Russian Federation, on the resignation from office
          INSTALLED:
          Suvorov Nikolai Fedorovich applied for the resignation of the President of the Russian Federation from his post.
          According to Chapter 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation is endowed with appropriate powers, the exercise of which is his prerogative, and the courts, including the Arbitration Court, have no right to interfere in its activities.
          By virtue of Article 91 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation has immunity, which means that it is impossible to bring the President of the Russian Federation to any liability established by federal legislation, including criminal liability.
          In accordance with Article 27 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the arbitration court is subordinate to cases on economic disputes and other cases related to the implementation of entrepreneurial and other economic activities.
          Arbitration courts resolve economic disputes and consider other cases with the participation of organizations that are legal entities, citizens carrying out entrepreneurial activities without forming a legal entity and having the status of an individual entrepreneur, acquired in accordance with the procedure established by law (hereinafter referred to as individual entrepreneurs), and in the cases provided for by this The Code and other federal laws, with the participation of the Russian Federation, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipalities, state bodies, local self-government bodies, other bodies, officials, entities that do not have the status of a legal entity, and citizens who do not have the status of an individual entrepreneur (hereinafter - organizations and citizens).
          Thus, this dispute is not subject to consideration in the arbitration court. In accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 150 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the arbitration court shall terminate the proceedings on the case if it finds that the case is not subject to consideration in the arbitration court. In view of the foregoing, guided by Articles 150, 184, 185 of the Arbitration
          of the procedural code of the Russian Federation, arbitration court
          DEFINED:
          Terminate the proceedings in case No. А57-5476 / 2016.
    3. 0
      April 8 2016 20: 05
      Quote: Nagan
      And can the prosecutor of some thread of the hypothetical Komi republic sue Putin?



      Um ... Well, some one could citizen (not the prosecutor) either Saratov, or Samara (I don't remember) to sue Putin just the other day? And the accusation there will be more abrupt - almost in the genocide of the Russian population ...

      So ... Let's see how the business develops further ...
    4. +3
      April 8 2016 20: 52
      Quote: Nagan
      And can a prosecutor of a thread of a hypothetical Komi republic make a lawsuit against Putin?

      Is there a reason?
      1. +1
        April 8 2016 21: 03
        Quote: GSH-18
        Is there a reason?

        Yes, the reason is not difficult to find. Well, at least the highest measure, which is in the Russian law, but for the sake of the heroes, it was pushed under a moratorium.
        Say hello to a modern pistol from an old revolver. For what demoted? Catch the marshal plus.
    5. +1
      April 9 2016 01: 17
      Quote: Nagan
      can the prosecutor of some thread of the hypothetical Komi republic sue Putin?

      No.

      In accordance with modern Russian legislation, the removal from office of the President is governed by Art. 93 of the Constitution. It provides State Duma charge in high treason or in the commission of another grave crime, must be accompanied by the opinion of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the presence of signs of a crime in the actions of the President and the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on compliance with the established procedure for bringing charges. Solution on the removal of the head of state from office adopted by the Federation Council
  10. +5
    April 8 2016 15: 48
    today it is extremely difficult to find an agreement that the United States has not yet managed to violate ... any international agreement for the United States ... for Washington has long become the norm.

    - Bravo! good
  11. +2
    April 8 2016 15: 52
    Quote: Galich Kos
    Is Putin to blame?


    No bl ... Santa Claus is to blame. Of course Putin, who else laughing

    Evidence AAAAAAAAAAAA!
  12. +3
    April 8 2016 15: 54
    Quote: Nagan
    And can the prosecutor of some thread of the hypothetical Komi republic sue Putin?

    You probably don't know all the news. hi Navalny has already filed a lawsuit against Putin, and recently a similar lawsuit was accepted in Saratov. But to be honest, this is such bullshit that you shouldn't pay attention. laughing
    1. +4
      April 8 2016 16: 26
      Quote: Andrew Peter
      Navalny has already filed a lawsuit against Putin

      Is Navalny the prosecutor of at least some thread of the administrative-territorial entity? Or finally, at least some thread by an official?
      That's the difference.
      1. 0
        April 10 2016 13: 24
        If my memory serves me, then this citizen is categorized as convicted, but why does not sit, then, yes, the question!
  13. +4
    April 8 2016 16: 00
    Under Yeltsin, the entire state stock of weapons-grade plutonium developed over the years, about 500 tons, was given for a song to America in exchange for support and loans from the IMF. This is Russian plutonium in the USA.
    1. 0
      April 8 2016 16: 06
      The entire state stock of weapons-grade plutonium is stored in Rosrezerv.
  14. +1
    April 8 2016 16: 07
    As I understood from the article, the United States should dispose of Russian weapons-grade plutonium, but did not do this, and now the state authorities are demanding the government to dispose of, and those excuses are molding. Well, let the state authorities decide to return the plutonium to the owner, i.e. the Russian Federation, and the question will be closed. lol
    1. +1
      April 9 2016 20: 21
      Quote: Captain45
      As I understood from the article, the United States should dispose of Russian weapons-grade plutonium, but did not do this, and now the state authorities are demanding the government to dispose of, and those excuses are molding. Well, let the state authorities decide to return the plutonium to the owner, i.e. the Russian Federation, and the question will be closed. lol

      What for is he needed? He's kind of spoiled. If he is still normal, then it will not be long.
  15. +1
    April 8 2016 16: 38
    Mattress toppers must convert plutonium into fuel for nuclear power plants. Cutting warheads out of it will not learn. So they are not tinkering with fine-tuning to the condition of the B / Z, but it's a pity for fuel, because plutonium is free.
  16. 0
    April 8 2016 16: 47
    An ominous picture ... We need to change the sign ... Wow, now it's okay.
  17. Riv
    +6
    April 8 2016 17: 11
    Well, something like this... :)
    1. hartlend
      0
      April 8 2016 18: 23
      Good pictures, put a plus. The comment is somehow worthless. If translated from Russian into Russian, it means - I myself do not know how, but I say so.
  18. PKK
    0
    April 8 2016 17: 16
    Plutonium in the world is very tight. The entire fuel 235 is running out, so it is logical to restrain it not to spend anything at all. In addition, 235 is space fuel, and the United States does not exclude that it will have to fall from the ground, and therefore veins uranium.
    1. +4
      April 8 2016 17: 44
      Quote: PKK
      Plutonium in the world is very tight. The entire fuel 235 is running out, so it is logical to restrain it not to spend anything at all. In addition, 235 is space fuel, and the United States does not exclude that it will have to fall from the ground, and therefore veins uranium.


      Generally, non-weapon plutonium has an atomic mass of 238.
    2. 0
      April 10 2016 12: 24
      You are confusing it with uranium.
  19. +4
    April 8 2016 17: 42
    This is weapons-grade plutonium. And the technology of reprocessing into reactor fuel, like the reactors themselves for plutonium fuel, is only with us. Do you remember the story of the heat and energy source at Curiosity? There the trick was that the plutonium there at 90% enrichment and the chemistry is clean, with the size of the block in the normal state it should explode. closed fuel chains. And only we have such a reactor, in one copy. Construction of the second has just begun.
  20. 0
    April 8 2016 19: 04
    Somehow the South Carolinians got hot that they sued, otherwise the storage facilities are located on the territory of their state.
  21. +2
    April 8 2016 19: 33
    Quote: vglazunov
    Under Yeltsin, the entire state stock of weapons-grade plutonium developed over the years, about 500 tons, was given for a song to America in exchange for support and loans from the IMF. This is Russian plutonium in the USA.

    Everything is correct, except for the number.))
    By the way, Chernomyrdin sold ALL our plutonium for a million dollars with a real value of hundreds of billions. At that time we had 10 times more of it than in Omerig.
  22. 0
    April 10 2016 11: 45
    ... any international agreement for the United States comes after national law ...


    As you wish, but I am for the same principle for Russia!

  23. 0
    April 10 2016 12: 50
    Hmm ... I read the comments of people who are not even aware of the international program between the United States and Russia for the disposal of weapons-grade plutonium, the so-called "VOUNOU" agreement But in fact, everyone in Russia has simply created a technology to convert weapons-grade plutonium into low-enriched fuel for US nuclear power plants, according to calculations, every tenth light bulb there is lit by Russian plutonium. That's all the arithmetic.
  24. 0
    April 10 2016 14: 06
    It is high time to abandon all the MILITARY agreements with NATO and the United States! All the same, they find a bunch of excuses to carry them out only in a way that suits them! And we are like fools. we carry them out, even to our own detriment! This situation is very similar to the one that was before the war. The Wehrmacht had already crossed our border, and our echelons with coal and food continued to meet the Germans ... Although, there is another option: to start doing, like the Americans - to interpret all these agreements EXCLUSIVELY in our favor, and act accordingly! And to the indignant cries from overseas to give such cunning replies that they are now giving us, and at the same time refer to the fact that they are doing the same! It would be a complete finish for NATO! laughing
  25. 0
    April 10 2016 14: 08
    But when will RUSSIA zabet in the USA ??? and will also begin to think about their NATIONAL INTERESTS and act in this direction ???
  26. +1
    April 10 2016 17: 09
    Capitalism has no national interests. There is interest in making a profit, super-profits up to "selling my mother". Therefore, the Russian Federation will never put on the United States. Rotten capitalists have started up in our country for a long time. Can't you see? The gas price famously shows the fucking homebrew capital's appetites.
  27. +1
    April 10 2016 17: 19
    "It is extremely difficult to find an agreement that the US has not yet violated."
    And Putin is to blame for everything - iron logic, it is not possible to disagree. "Tin".
  28. 0
    April 11 2016 02: 12
    There is a difference between the priority of national legislation and compliance with international obligations. One does not exclude the other. The author confuses these concepts.
  29. 0
    April 11 2016 11: 04
    Considering the fact that any international agreement for the United States stands after national law

    This is fine. I’ll even say more: this should be so if the state does not want to be called a colony.
    Unfortunately, we have international affairs as a priority even when it is not consistent with domestic interests.