The Russian Foreign Ministry responded to the US State Department to declare readiness to veto a deal between Russia and Iran on arms supplies to Tehran

120
US Deputy Secretary General Tom Shannon said that the United States is "concerned about Russia's plans to cooperate with Iran on sales of Su-30 and S-300 SAM systems." According to Shannon, Russia has no right to supply Tehran with such weapons without the appropriate sanctions of the UN Security Council. RIA News quotes Mr. Shannon’s statement:
Obviously, we are not interested in Iran having advanced fighter jets or ground complexes. We will try to oppose any systems that can be used by Iran for offensive purposes, by any means available to us.


The Russian Foreign Ministry responded to the US State Department to declare readiness to veto a deal between Russia and Iran on arms supplies to Tehran


It seems that Washington is now preparing to present a diagram of how Iran intends to use C-300 "for offensive purposes", while American bombers will conduct purely defensive actions in the air ...

Recall that deliveries of C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran will begin this summer, and the contract for the supply of Su-30CM fighter jets to Tehran will be signed within a year.

The Foreign Ministry commented on the statement by the representative of the US State Department. According to the press service of the Russian diplomatic department, statements by the United States that they would veto the supply of Su-30CM and C-300 to Tehran are meaningless, since Moscow did not submit the relevant applications to the UN Security Council due to the fact that Iranian relations have already been dropped.
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +58
    April 6 2016 06: 26
    Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.
    1. +65
      April 6 2016 06: 32
      And who got infected from whom? Question?
      1. +66
        April 6 2016 06: 47
        the State Department imposed a veto out of fear, and the Russian Bear put it on him.
        1. +44
          April 6 2016 07: 39
          The State Department simply imposed from fear! They in Fashton will soon come up with such a law that only they, the exceptional ones, have the right to trade weapons in the world. To whom, to whom to nitsche, to whom ... over a shoulder. They would walk in the woods, smelly devils.
          1. +15
            April 6 2016 09: 18
            Cheerful guys in Washington cannot understand in any way that Russia is no longer responding to howls and will not.
          2. +3
            April 6 2016 19: 53
            Quote: gergi
            The State Department simply imposed from fear! They in Fashton will soon come up with such a law that only they, the exceptional ones, have the right to trade weapons in the world. To whom, to whom to nitsche, to whom ... over a shoulder. They would walk in the woods, smelly devils.

            Yeah. And according to their law, what they sold to someone should be immediately disposed of, because no one, except for "exceptional" penguins, will have the right to use weapons. angry
            1. +2
              April 8 2016 23: 13
              Of course, the United States did not abandon its plans for a "lightning strike" on Iran.

              Iran they have the target number 1 now, t to defeat Iran and go right into the heart of Eurasia in the Caspian Sea - under the belly of Russia by the way

              Therefore, as we all know, there is war in Syria (and not just because of Qatari gas pipes)

              Russia and China will support Iran in any way - by open export of arms and technology - if it doesn’t work out, they will probably just provide technology with smuggling - but they should not give Iran to the USA
        2. +14
          April 6 2016 08: 30
          Quote: sibi
          Ospep fear vetoed, and the Russian Bear put on him.


          The US is preparing to veto our deal with Iran.
          Maybe it's time to stop responding to the stink coming from the Anglo-Saxon side?
        3. 0
          April 7 2016 23: 54
          Not "put", but put a lot of what is needed.
        4. 0
          April 8 2016 09: 09
          Just "+" hi
        5. 0
          April 8 2016 11: 51
          ..but this veto is very big and very smelly ..
        6. 0
          April 8 2016 13: 29
          We must likewise create our own bloc in the likeness of NATO, and then freely deploy, in the sense of selling our arms as Americans throughout Europe. And they all went to the butterfly farm to catch.
          1. +1
            April 8 2016 23: 22
            Quote: Drozd-Den
            We must similarly create our own block in the likeness of NATO,


            Sorry, the idea is certainly good. but we must measure opportunities and desires

            So did the USSR - tk could resist the USA on equal terms
            And he called the allies allies and created blocs and half of Europe was then "for us" in the form of the Warsaw Treaty and Cuba and the DPRK and Vietnam etc.

            Now - as we all see. all are disguised - the time has not yet come to "take off the masks" and "drop the glove". That is, now it is still impossible to openly create blocs and alliances - you have to hide and disguise - although everyone already understands everything

            We have to wait another years 10-15 - until a new US adversary rises instead of the USSR

            so the joint exercises of the navies of China and Russia until recently were shamefacedly called "anti-terrorist" because the masters of the world gave the command - the main enemy is "terrorists"
            At the same time, the tasks of sinking nuclear submarines of "terrorists", AUG "terrorists" were worked out, satellites of "terrorists" were shot down and a massive landing of "terrorists" was reflected on the Chinese coast
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. PAM
        +1
        April 7 2016 17: 02
        sanctions it may be lifted but not all accounts are unlocked
    2. +23
      April 6 2016 06: 37
      The Russian Foreign Ministry commented on the statement by the representative of the US State Department. According to the press service of the Russian diplomatic department, the US claims that they will veto the supply of Su-30SM and S-300 to Tehran are meaningless, since Moscow did not submit relevant applications to the UN Security Council due to the fact that the sanctions against Iran already lifted
      The Russian Foreign Ministry was to make a three-word comment ... To whom, when and what to sell, Russia will decide for herself.
      1. +22
        April 6 2016 06: 42
        Quote: Black
        The Russian Foreign Ministry was to make a three-word comment ... To whom, when and what to sell, Russia will decide for herself.

        something like an inscription in a minibus, don’t tell me how to go and I won’t tell you where to go
      2. +82
        April 6 2016 06: 43
        In our memory, Yugoslavia — there sorely lacked a pair of S-300s — how it ended, we remember. Who passed Yugoslavia, we remember too. Strongly remember.
        1. +31
          April 6 2016 08: 46
          Quote: Voha_krim
          In our memory, Yugoslavia, there sorely lacked a pair of C-300-how it ended-remember.Who handed over Yugoslavia, remember too. Strongly remember.

          C-300 - offensive weapons !!!!! Bravo America! Since the days of "humanizer and" civilizer "Cortez America has not seen anything funnier !!!!!

          And all palm oil and glutamate are to blame! Shannon needs to give up McDonald's ... You look, fighters will cease to be attack, and C-300 - offensive.

          Although, if desired, both a stool and a sapper blade are offensive weapons ....
        2. +7
          April 6 2016 09: 08
          Yesterday they celebrated the bombing with songs and dances. Ur.od.y moral.
        3. +8
          April 7 2016 09: 57
          A wonderful phrase from Shannon "... syshya are worried about deliveries without appropriate UN Security Council sanctions ...". Remember the Yankees, the blood of the people of Yugoslavia, which you bombed without sanctions, remember Vietnam, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. Remember all the color revolutions in the former republics of the USSR - yes, your descendants will not forgive their sin until the end of the existence of your "democratic territory". Curse you from all the slain since the natives of America.
        4. 0
          April 7 2016 20: 56
          Hard !!! For a long time!!!
      3. +11
        April 6 2016 07: 33
        A familiar shout, but with France a ride - suddenly it will pass here.
        1. +3
          April 8 2016 11: 53
          .. late drink Borjomi if the kidneys flew off ..
      4. +5
        April 6 2016 11: 21
        Quote: Black
        The Russian Foreign Ministry commented on the statement by the representative of the US State Department. According to the press service of the Russian diplomatic department, the US claims that they will veto the supply of Su-30SM and S-300 to Tehran are meaningless, since Moscow did not submit relevant applications to the UN Security Council due to the fact that the sanctions against Iran already lifted
        The Russian Foreign Ministry was to make a three-word comment ... To whom, when and what to sell, Russia will decide for herself.
    3. +6
      April 6 2016 06: 40
      Quote: MainBeam
      Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.

      this is the case when the student surpassed the teacher
    4. +10
      April 6 2016 06: 45
      Quote: MainBeam
      Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.


      So the American State Department is generally a breeding ground for an infection causing acute dementia and aggravated by megalomania. In general, there is a feeling that they are hiring there after passing exams according to one well-known book - "How to rule the world without attracting the attention of orderlies." laughing
      If earlier their statements caused a smile, now it’s not funny anymore. The comrades live in a surreal world invented by them and are trying to redraw the whole world to this sick fantasy. wassat fool
      1. +14
        April 6 2016 11: 44
        And oh, what a big fantasy.
        1. +7
          April 6 2016 11: 46
          And stupidity is even greater.
        2. +2
          April 6 2016 22: 29
          about vandals - it's something soft ...

          Vandals, they are Wendels, Wends, Wends, Vantichs (Vyatichi) ... In short, they were Russian! laughing Estonians Witnesses: Estonian Russians - Venelased, Russia -Venemaa.
        3. 0
          April 7 2016 21: 20
          Yes, Zhenya Psaki is sorely lacking. Such sweet dumbness compared to current clinical idiots.
    5. +1
      April 6 2016 10: 29
      So what kind of teacher, and such a student))))
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +1
      April 6 2016 11: 14
      Quote: MainBeam
      Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.

      Stsuki, they wanted a "clear" sky. fool
    9. +1
      April 6 2016 18: 40
      Where are the psaki? Where are the psaki?
    10. +1
      April 7 2016 03: 49
      ... with whom you will lead, from that you will pick up ..
    11. +1
      April 7 2016 11: 57
      Why is the US afraid of it? In which case, they still sell the Iranian defense in quantity.
      They apparently generally want to do without a single loss in the event of a hypothetical conflict.
    12. +3
      April 7 2016 17: 46
      And here, my friend, you are not right !!! Fundamentally wrong! Don't be stupid !!! They know exactly what they are saying. Withdrawing from the ABM Treaty is "for defense and security ..."
      Placing a missile defense system in Eastern Europe is the same! But the strengthening of air defense in the Middle East is already "aggression" !!
      A classic example of 2 standards:
      "What is good for achieving world domination is good; What is against is" aggression. " The rest - the media and PR specialists will justify!
      I will not comment (the moderator will delete - he nevertheless undertook not to swear!)
      1. 0
        April 8 2016 12: 12
        I can’t remember - for what, in general, did they initially impose sanctions against Iran?
    13. 0
      April 8 2016 13: 33
      Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.
      In this respect, there is a wonderful Russian proverb: "With whom you will lead from that and you will gain!" Sei "garny lads" do not shine with intelligence!
  2. Dam
    +27
    April 6 2016 06: 29
    In each barrel a plug, our dear partners. And so a good slogan: s-300 is the best patented remedy for democracy.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +5
      April 6 2016 06: 35
      Quote: Damm
      remedy for democracy.

      from democratization ...
      1. +3
        April 6 2016 09: 21
        more precisely from demons!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      April 6 2016 06: 41
      Quote: Damm
      And so a good slogan: s-300 is the best patented remedy for democracy.

      From "American" democracy. Sanctions have been lifted from Iran, but these creatures can easily return them, having come up with another reason for fulfilling their Wishlist.
      1. +8
        April 6 2016 07: 14
        Quote: Tol100v
        Sanctions have been lifted from Iran, but these creatures can easily return them, having come up with another reason for fulfilling their wishlist.


        the problem is that this will require a new UN Security Council resolution, where Russia has the right to veto ...
        1. +1
          April 6 2016 11: 44
          Quote: kitamo
          where Russia has the right to veto, just there ...

          China is also not interested in new sanctions against Iran.
    4. +3
      April 6 2016 06: 51
      I would add .. "from crap" .. We guarantee you peace and development of the country ..
      Quote: Damm
      In each barrel a plug, our dear partners. And so a good slogan: s-300 is the best patented remedy for democracy.
      1. +1
        April 7 2016 04: 05
        ... well, so to speak, mabud, after the Arabs have S-300, the Semites will rush to us, this seed is still that seed .., and we need it? .. If we break into a penguin, then a different alignment ..
    5. +1
      April 7 2016 18: 48
      In each barrel a plug, our dear partners. And so a good slogan: s-300 is the best patented remedy for democracy.

      If "respected partners" is a plug, then the S-300 is rather a remedy for constipation for "respected partners". lol
  3. +9
    April 6 2016 06: 31
    are meaningless, since Moscow did not submit relevant applications to the UN Security Council due to the fact that sanctions against Iran have already been lifted.

    But the Americans once again reminded about their bump out of the blue ... The navel of the earth, his mother ...
    1. +4
      April 6 2016 06: 37
      Quote: ImPerts
      But the Americans once again reminded about their bump out of the blue ... The navel of the earth, his mother ...

      Now they will not be able to democratize Iran, and so howled from impotence.
  4. +4
    April 6 2016 06: 37
    Once we have already followed the lead of these sanctions from the "world democrats", so what? Now they themselves are under sanctions, and the fine was almost ripped off from us. No, go to ... a bathhouse with your sanctions.
  5. +10
    April 6 2016 06: 37
    sanctions against Iran have already been lifted ... And the men in America do not know about this!?!?!?
    1. +1
      April 7 2016 07: 44
      And the men in America do not know about this!?!?!?


      Yes, they generally know little, given their level of education in the country, you can hang any noodles on your ears.
    2. 0
      April 7 2016 11: 20
      ... anachraon to cowboys - that is to say, shepherds of cows still have high matters ..?
  6. +2
    April 6 2016 06: 37
    Well, if Iran would buy F16 from America then it is possible, but if F22 would be at all in the ceiling.
  7. +2
    April 6 2016 06: 38
    Obviously, we are not interested in Iran having advanced fighter jets or ground complexes. We will try to oppose any systems that can be used by Iran for offensive purposes, by any means available to us.


    The Americans once again puff out their cheeks, puffing, posing as the most important on the planet. Russia and Iran have their own interests.
  8. +1
    April 6 2016 06: 39
    They will try to put pressure on us in every way possible! An attempt is almost a diagnosis of impotence.
  9. +5
    April 6 2016 06: 39
    Iran has the right to defend itself. In its territory, by the way. Unlike the same states that protect themselves anywhere, but not at home.
  10. +2
    April 6 2016 06: 40
    ))) It can be easier .. to make an agreement under which Iran is part of Russia)) and will sell at least nuclear weapons!
    1. +3
      April 6 2016 06: 44
      Quote: Nitarius
      ))) It can be easier .. to make an agreement under which Iran is part of Russia)) and will sell at least nuclear weapons!

      why sell? place
  11. +7
    April 6 2016 06: 45
    this Zionist lobby throws a tantrum
  12. +2
    April 6 2016 06: 54
    As they are afraid of the niche, the downers (S-300), already identified it on the offensive, this is the case when they increase pride in their country
  13. +3
    April 6 2016 06: 55
    It is interesting to see how the Yankees will impede delivery? Will an aircraft carrier be driven into the Caspian Sea? Probably for this they Ukrainians will force the channel through Turkey to dig there laughing
    1. +1
      April 6 2016 11: 49
      Ukrainians have a lot of experience, where they want to go to a channel or a hobby.
    2. +1
      April 6 2016 16: 03
      Hi!! It is much more complicated here. Against Israel And the United States, as a guarantor, is trying to bury the entire Middle East in the 20th century. Look carefully at how they smashed the economy of Syria and before that Iraq. One of the skeletons of former greatness. There is only one corner where development continues. Saudi Arabia Emirates and Israel. They have close ties. They are silent about this, but the fact remains. Slowly, while everyone is looking at Syria and Turkey, a close alliance is formed there, including the military.
  14. +1
    April 6 2016 07: 00
    Blackmailers, however. Know what point to push.
  15. +7
    April 6 2016 07: 06
    So the Americans have plans to bring the same democracy to the people of Iran. And with the S-300, Iran may not agree to become an American democratic state.
  16. +1
    April 6 2016 07: 23
    by any means available to us.

    After such statements (not the first and not the last) I am always interested in what methods you will use. The military is a little gutsy, because you know that you will get a response and a serious one. Another get on in the media - we saw it yesterday, it doesn't work. So what exactly, gentlemen, Anglo-Saxons? Trying to "tear to shreds" the Russian economy tears its part of the body, which is called the fifth point.
  17. +3
    April 6 2016 07: 25
    US lives in parallel reality lol
    1. 0
      April 7 2016 14: 02
      Everywhere you throw oceans in parallel, that's why they all dream lol
  18. +2
    April 6 2016 07: 32
    The insolence of the US State Department knows no limits, most likely they confused Russia with their favorite "horses"! No guys, it's not like that, and it is simply not possible and not even safe to press V.V. Putin! And we wanted to spit on your "veto" and your sanctions! We will live without you, but you are doubtful without us ...! Considering the next "itch" of the US politicians, it is necessary to immediately supply the S-300 and something else to "surprise" the international bandits and bloodsuckers in the person of the US and their lackeys! It will be especially pleasant for the "camel breeders", it's time for them to arrange "Alaverdy" for Chechnya!
  19. +3
    April 6 2016 07: 39
    The screams, habitual for the world Derzhimorda: "No orders to let go!"
  20. 0
    April 6 2016 07: 43
    Quote: kitamo
    the problem is that this will require a new UN Security Council resolution, where Russia has the right of veto, just there ..

    And whether Russia will use its veto right in this case, or, as in the case of Libya and the sanctions that have already been lifted, will promote its "dissenting opinion" is still a big question ..
    so I would not be so categorical.
  21. +1
    April 6 2016 07: 45
    Quote: veteran66
    Once we have already followed the lead of these sanctions from the "world democrats", so what?

    ONE TIME ..? if only once it would still go wherever ..
  22. +2
    April 6 2016 07: 56
    Well, how are they going to resist? They will not be in a military way, for this is a hello to the end of the planet. Diplomatic? So the sanctions of the Security Council were lifted, new ones introduced through the UN if Russia has a veto — our diplomats certainly do not reach the level of their Soviet colleagues, but they seem to have passed the era of trump cards. Maybe there are some other methods? Well, in principle, there is another method acceptable for us - to buy from us all the weapons intended for export;) Iran will not get anything then, and we will rise well ))
  23. +3
    April 6 2016 07: 58
    Russia has already "thrown" Iran with S-300 supplies once, and without any UN sanctions (President Mitya did not order), it is now slowly restoring supplies, but its reputation cannot be improved so quickly. Persians are very vindictive ...

    America scares about planes in advance. Typically, such transactions are prepared for several years, and so far not scary. But if only at the last moment the authorities are not afraid again. Let's hope...
    1. +1
      April 7 2016 04: 20
      ..Chi Iran, chi Turkey - one hell, current in his left hand - they sleep and see the Caliphate to the northern seas .., we don’t need such a "present" - let us play together - the fewer opportunities - the less ambitions .. -Let's get busy with a tolerant Europa "sex" - dill to help them ..
  24. +3
    April 6 2016 08: 00
    Cognitive dissonance is evident. Russia itself, being under sanctions, is not obliged to comply with sanctions against other countries. It’s so simple: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. But the State Department has such giants of thought that there is nowhere else.
  25. 0
    April 6 2016 08: 01
    Quote: rotmistr60
    by any means available to us.

    After such statements (not the first and not the last) I am always interested in what methods you will use. The military is a little gutsy, because you know that you will get a response and a serious one. Another get on in the media - we saw it yesterday, it doesn't work. So what exactly, gentlemen, Anglo-Saxons? Trying to "tear to shreds" the Russian economy tears its part of the body, which is called the fifth point.

    sanctions, Dear, the next "Chinese" sanctions, such as the Baltic states will again eat sprats itself, for the other they have little guts.
  26. 0
    April 6 2016 08: 14
    Unclear. In the morning they wrote that in the conditions of lifting the sanctions it is written that arms supplies are coordinated by the UN Security Council, where naturally Americans can block everything
  27. 0
    April 6 2016 08: 15
    By the way, I heard that, if necessary, c-300 can peel on the ground.
    1. +1
      April 7 2016 04: 26
      ... lupanut and horseradish possible, what current in this buzz? ..
  28. +1
    April 6 2016 08: 19
    Russia does not have the right to supply such weapons to Tehran without the relevant sanctions of the UN Security Council. RIA Novosti quoted Mr. Shannon as saying:


    It's time to rename this UN the so-called organization (most of it) has long been dancing under the striped master. So what the hell is she for?
  29. +8
    April 6 2016 08: 39
    Quote: Unique
    By the way, I heard that, if necessary, c-300 can peel on the ground.


    Maybe only the target should move at 0,4 - Mach 0,5 speed. laughing
    Ps no offense, I also heard, but to shoot anti-aircraft missiles at ground targets .. Not for this they are purchased. And very expensive. You can also hammer nails with your Vertu phone. This is especially effective if the case is made of gold. But not accepted request
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 10: 27
      Quote: Unique
      By the way, I heard that, if necessary, c-300 can peel on the ground.


      Maybe only the target should move at a speed of 0,4 - 0,5 Mach. laughing
      Ps no offense, I also heard, but to shoot anti-aircraft missiles at ground targets .. Not for this they are purchased. And very expensive. You can also hammer nails with your Vertu phone. This is especially effective if the case is made of gold. But not accepted


      The CIA is preparing a report on the possibility of using the S-300 for offensive purposes wassat can help with ideas? You see, they will give the prize and invite it to their ONB (Department of Non-Fables)

      as an initiator, I propose the first option - with the help of the S-300 missile, roll out the defenders or slowly roll up to the tank and blow it up! belay There are still options, but I’ll only announce it after prepayment! and in general - I propose to work closely with the Americans in this field - if we pour 150 grams each, we will have a free tongue and we will finally create a bunch of military doctrines for them! if cheaper - why overpay for your writers and advisers? Yes, and with their imagination, the one ... where is our dubious psaki? (why are they sometimes accurate ... I can’t say the names - the names of the figures!)
  30. +2
    April 6 2016 09: 21
    To reciprocate, we too need to express "concern and concern" about America's actions, while instructing America what to do and where to go.
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 13: 35
      Quote: PValery53
      To reciprocate, we too need to express "concern and concern" about America's actions, while instructing America what to do and where to go.
      Straight to the bull's eye! Why are we silent? Lots of questions for mattress toppers! They want to increase the number of troops in Europe - immediately the Foreign Ministry's statement on the annexation of Ukraine! Put their weapons in Georgia - annexation of Georgia! NATO ships entered the Black Sea - retaliatory strike against Fashington! Humor, of course, but there is some truth. Silence is a sign of consent, you need to communicate with "partners" wassat
      1. 0
        April 7 2016 15: 49
        In some ways you are right, and in some ways you are not. You offer to communicate with our "partners" in their language, and this is wrong. You don't talk to a gopnik or a convict on the "hair dryer" =) So we are conducting a dialogue AS WE NEED it.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  31. 0
    April 6 2016 09: 43
    This is not surprising, in the case of the actual implementation of the concluded contracts between Iran and Russia on the specified arms deliveries, the air gates to the Middle East for the Yankees and NATO will be locked with a strong lock ...
  32. +3
    April 6 2016 10: 47
    "According to Shannon, Russia does not have the right to supply such weapons to Tehran without the relevant sanctions of the UN Security Council"...

    Um ... I’ll give you today's (next) news from Obama:

    "Obama declared the need for military investment to fight Russia
    Military investments include expanding US plans in Europe to support their NATO allies
    "In the light of Russia's aggressive actions," Obama said "...

    Source: http://www.forbes.ru/news/317283-obama-zayavil-o-neobkhodimosti-voennykh-investi
    tsii-dlya-borby-s-rossiei

    There he spoke out for the need to supply NATO with modern weapons and, attention, Ukraine !!!

    For some reason, such an idea appeared ... The Warsaw Pact collapsed ... Why not stir up a certain "bloc" in the Middle East ??? To ensure the security of both some Middle Eastern countries and the southern borders of Russia ??? With the participation of the same Iran and Russia? And supply him with weapons without asking anyone ???

    And Iran to supply both the S-300 and the Su-30 - we just need to, even just to the peak of the United States and its hangers-on ...
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 13: 41
      Quote: weksha50
      "Obama pledges military investment to fight Russia Military investment includes expanding US plans in Europe to support its NATO allies" in light of Russian aggressive action, "Obama said" ...
      Meatballs to Siberia, a grandmother to give an African palm with a banana, and restore the Warsaw Pact, well, they want it, they really want it!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  33. +1
    April 6 2016 11: 27
    And if you don’t sell, but lease it out well or on lease, how will it go.
    1. +1
      April 6 2016 11: 48
      and together with the crews ...
      1. 0
        April 6 2016 13: 35
        With the crews will not work, not enough for ourselves. But to study, please. Only foreigners study, most of them are reluctant to wipe their pants.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  34. 0
    April 6 2016 13: 06
    Again, the Americans are mowing a fool ...
  35. 0
    April 6 2016 13: 43
    US Under Secretary General Tom Shannon
    fix on
    Under Secretary of State Tom Shannon
  36. +2
    April 6 2016 13: 57
    They are all ridiculous, these Exceptional ...
  37. 0
    April 6 2016 14: 24
    "... about the readiness to veto the deal between Russia and Iran ..."
    Quote: Dmitry Potapov
    They will try to put pressure on us in every way possible!

    So it’s not the last vote in the Security Council — we will also have to veto something.
  38. +1
    April 6 2016 14: 28
    Zadornov was right. Rather, he was not, and even now he is right with his catchphrase "Nuuu stupid !!!"
  39. +3
    April 6 2016 14: 32
    The United States is “concerned about Russia's plans to cooperate with Iran ...
    Worried that there wouldn’t be enough ropes ...
  40. 0
    April 6 2016 15: 38
    In general, after the sanctions against us, we should generally be purple, for someone there are "wishes" and concerns. Actually, Putin spoke a little about that in the UN (with a small letter), it is useless to convince this whole gang of watering cans of something, to shame and urge. It is necessary specifically, once to put the question "squarely": Either Russia together with the whole world or this world, called the planet Earth, will not be, from the word at all. Otherwise, all this shobla does not understand, in short, either with us or in any way !
  41. +1
    April 6 2016 16: 39
    The most worried about the supply of Iran to the S-300 and Su-30 is the Jewish lobby in the US Congress (therefore, such a noise was raised), because Israel (as it did in Iraq) will not be able to bomb Iran’s nuclear reactors with impunity. Operation Opera (also known as Operation Babylon) is a military operation carried out by the Israeli Air Force to destroy a French-made Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq in June 1981.
  42. +2
    April 6 2016 16: 49
    The more they try to ban us, and the more often we ignore these prohibitions, the smaller the image of the United States and the greater the Russian Federation in the international political arena. Naturally, everything is within reason.
  43. +1
    April 6 2016 17: 09
    Well, how can you not bomb the Middle East? After all, it turns out Syria, Iran, you look Egypt - everything is in the no-fly zone. How to get oil production? Oilfield is the same. What a wonderful plaintive grunts.
  44. +3
    April 6 2016 17: 12
    Eh, the State Department .... After all, it has already been said that "things will not be conducted as before!" And therefore - sha! It's too late to drink Borjomi!
    In general, if the "partners" are worried, then we are doing everything right!
  45. 0
    April 6 2016 18: 29
    Quote: Damm
    In each barrel a plug, our dear partners. And so a good slogan: s-300 is the best patented remedy for democracy.

    I fully agree!
  46. 0
    April 6 2016 19: 49
    When, finally, our Americans will answer as in a joke: "And we - the army!" ... on you and your sanctions
  47. 0
    April 6 2016 20: 11
    If in Iran, an Islamic fanatic comes to power and cracks a rocket over Israel, then Iran will be difficult to bomb and then, and we will remember this deal.
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 20: 52
      And if we start to remember everything?
    2. +1
      April 7 2016 04: 35
      ... our hut from the edge ...
  48. +1
    April 6 2016 20: 36
    the time has passed when they could put pressure on us, all the bastards are English-speaking. now you’re also pouring a bucket with a fart and we’ll generally put some kind of organ on you
  49. 0
    April 6 2016 20: 47
    Quote: wandlitz
    sanctions against Iran have already been lifted ... And the men in America do not know about this!?!?!?

    And where are the "men". On the other hand, there is a lot of monsters ... who would shoot down a civilian Iranian plane like two fingers "obosfalt".
  50. +1
    April 6 2016 20: 53
    Damn, I'm extremely worried, extremely ...
    and I express my concern to everyone ...
    creepy, supersonic missiles from the S-300 complex, (uh ... and suddenly, the S-400 accidentally gets there, it's the same Russian) .. attack on defenseless, innocent strategic B2 bombers ... that will carry out exclusively peacekeeping operations - A bunch of anger, there, Flame of Fury ... or, say, Indestructible freedom. Our pilots, you know, are carrying diapers-sneakers ... uh, well, there’s something else ...
    And missiles - attack, oppress, do not give free breathing.
    ...
    And you guys say, defensive weapons ....
    Offensive weapons, purely offensive.
    Depressing.
    Sophisticated spreading ... captains of America with all kinds of Batmans and the rest of the sticky husk ... oh, Super-mans.
    ...
    We must finish, in short, read the press. And watch the box.
    Choi me to jerk every time after this pulls.
    Not good. Oh, not good.
  51. 0
    April 6 2016 20: 59
    Quote: MainBeam
    Dumb as ukra-maydauny. Contagious, however.

    Ukrainian maydauns and Americans are considered the same thing))
    1. 0
      April 7 2016 23: 11
      Washington is now preparing to present a diagram of how Iran plans to use the S-300 “for offensive purposes,” while American bombers will conduct purely defensive operations in the air...
      According to the press service of the Russian diplomatic department, US statements that they will veto the supply of Su-30SM and S-300 to Tehran are meaningless, since Moscow did not submit relevant applications to the UN Security Council due to the fact that the sanctions regarding Iran have already been lifted.

      They're also jumping around in Washington, it's just like an epidemic belay request what fool laughing
  52. 0
    April 6 2016 21: 23
    It’s in vain that everyone, in a patriotic frenzy, splashes something without hitting the exceptional ones. Because their statement makes sense. Regarding the S-300, they clearly “got overboard”; the weapon is clearly defensive, which cannot be fully said about the Su-30. And this, I don’t remember exactly until what year, it seems until 2018, only with the approval of the UN Security Council. And there, there’s no way without amers.
    So, not everything is as easy and dashing as they post here....
  53. 0
    April 6 2016 23: 11
    It seems like a world power, but behaves worse than a kindergartener. No logic, no sense.
  54. 0
    April 7 2016 07: 20
    Quote: igorek4515
    And whether Russia will use its veto right in this case, or, as in the case of Libya and the sanctions that have already been lifted, will promote its "dissenting opinion" is still a big question ..
    so I would not be so categorical.

    Now he will take advantage, there is no longer any point in sitting quietly and below the grass, since there is an open escalation of tension between countries.
  55. 0
    April 7 2016 09: 08
    taken down, Karl!! removed!! They took it off themselves))) what is the Security Council like now??
  56. 0
    April 7 2016 09: 40
    Dog barks the wind wears
  57. +1
    April 7 2016 11: 07
    Recall that deliveries of C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran will begin this summer, and the contract for the supply of Su-30CM fighter jets to Tehran will be signed within a year.
    This summer!!?? Perhaps it will be too late.
  58. 0
    April 7 2016 16: 06
    Sometimes it seems to me that only backward people live in Sharia, how they even became so rich is not clear
  59. The comment was deleted.
  60. 0
    April 7 2016 21: 50
    or maybe as usual, in our opinion!!!
  61. 0
    April 7 2016 22: 07
    how unusual and uncomfortable it is to feel like an unnecessary and powerless ruler of the world - one by one his subjects have already fled
  62. 0
    April 7 2016 23: 12
    Ban Iran, ban Russia, the UN will speak when asked... and what will they say... Who is not with us is the Russian). We sanction with sanctions. We democratize with bombs. (the dream of an American democrat)
  63. 0
    April 8 2016 07: 01
    Russia does not have the right to supply such weapons to Tehran without the relevant sanctions of the UN Security Council


    Funny ... lol
  64. 0
    April 8 2016 16: 08
    Quote: sibi
    The State Department vetoed out of fear
    More likely: “The State Department imposed it out of fear”...
  65. 0
    April 8 2016 18: 52
    But we don’t care who, how and what to sell?
  66. 0
    April 8 2016 22: 45
    Untalented and illiterate American politicians. The last chance to find a place in life for those who could not “find themselves” in business.